The technical field is wireless communications.
A key performance indicator of any wireless network is coverage. In addition to providing an evolving set of features to customers, the most successful wireless networks are those that provide ubiquitous coverage and service to as broad a base of subscribers as possible. Because of the emphasis on coverage, these same networks seldom, if ever, provide methods of restricted or controlled access for targeted areas in the network. However, with heightened security concerns, and for other reasons, targeted wireless access restriction may be an important consideration, especially in a localized area, and/or for specific time periods.
An intelligent network access controller for use within a targeted area or areas provides communications services across some or all relevant wireless technologies and spectrums to subscribers having wireless communications devices. The controller produces the targeted coverage area, wherein wireless access limitations may be enabled by using interfaces for receiving and sending digital messaging by the wireless communications devices; an identification module that determines an identity of a wireless communications device; an access module that receives the identity and determines an access level for the wireless communications device; and a locking module that implements logic that accepts, releases, or allows service to selected wireless communications devices to the controller based on the determined access level.
A method for restricting access to wireless communications to and from a wireless network comprises the steps of provoking access to the intelligent network access controller through a registration request or call/text message/or data session initiation from a wireless communications device; determining a category of the wireless communications device; if the determined category is a first category, accepting the access of the device to the intelligent network access controller and thus locking the wireless communications device to the broadcast signal transmitted by the intelligent network access controller so that access to the wireless network is prevented; and if the determined category is a second category, redirecting the wireless communications device to re-attempt access with the wireless network.
The detailed description will refer to the following figures in which like numerals refer to like items, and in which:
A key performance indicator of any wireless network is coverage. The most successful wireless networks are those that have ever-expanding coverage, independent of time, to provide ubiquitous service to any and all subscribers and roaming users. Because of the emphasis on coverage, these same networks seldom, if ever, operate so as to restrict access. However, with heightened security concerns, and for other reasons, wireless access restriction may be an important consideration, especially in a localized area, and/or for specific time periods.
Current systems that impose some type of wireless access restriction function may employ jamming equipment to block wireless signals in a particular area. Other systems rely on shutdown of a cell or sector. These current wireless access restriction solutions do not discriminate among users. Instead, these solutions impose a total prohibition on wireless communications. Furthermore, these current solutions are complicated and expensive to invoke. Finally, with these current solutions, if a situation requires that certain personnel (e.g., emergency response personnel) be able to communicate using wireless communications, a secondary communications network must be established since jamming or cell shutdown prohibits all wireless communications for a given wireless technology.
In most cases jamming works across a spectrum of radio frequencies and jams the use of the entire spectrum regardless of the wireless technology or technologies deployed in the spectrum. So in the case of jamming, a localized communications network must be established on its own technology, unique devices, and spectrum further complicating the setup and operations.
Another challenge is that in most areas covered by wireless communications there are typically multiple technologies operating in a variety of spectrum ranges. Jamming solutions and cell turn down are absolute solutions that do not provide the ability to select on a device by device basis the ability to use the wireless communication within the target area.
To overcome these limitations with current art wireless communication access restriction solutions, disclosed herein is an intelligent network access controller, and accompanying method, which is shown in
The intelligent network access controller provides, on a single platform, the necessary components for an end-to-end solution for selective communications restriction across the spectrum of wireless technology, frequency, and access methodology. In an embodiment, wireless users are classified into categories and either allowed to access the wireless networks or are prohibited access, on a subscriber-by-subscriber basis. The intelligent network access controller meets the criteria of service restriction that may be required in specific areas, while allowing selected individuals wireless communications access to wireless networks in those same areas. Thus, the intelligent network access controller eliminates the need to overlay additional communications systems to provide targeted localized wireless communications. The intelligent network access controller implements its service across both commercial as well as private wireless networks.
The intelligent network access controller is particularly useful in certain permanent facilities such as embassies, government facilities, prisons, military installations, stadiums and arenas, hospitals, public transportation facilities, landmarks, and in temporary applications including disaster recovery operations and homeland security operations. In short, the intelligent network access controller can be used in any situation or at any facility or locale to establish a controlled wireless communications environment whereby only selected individuals can access a wireless communications network.
“Locking” the wireless devices to the INAC 100 indicates that the wireless device 20 is tuned to and has been accepted by the local signal broadcast of the INAC 100. The INAC 100 implements a mimicked signal that may follow the signal patterns, parameters, and characteristics of the underlying wireless network; however the localized signal is only connected to the INAC 100 and not the wireless network as a whole. The end result is a wireless device that has the appearance of operating on the wireless network; however by virtue of the wireless device 20 being tuned to the local INAC 100 signal, the wireless device 20 is by default “locked” from access to the wireless network outside the coverage area of the INAC 100.
A “device” or “wireless device” includes any wireless access mechanism including wireless handheld devices used for communications and laptop computers, personal digital assistants, or other computing device that includes wireless access technology.
A “wireless network” includes networks that provide commercial or private wireless access for voice, text, and or data access.
The INAC 100 may be implemented as an adjunct to the wireless network 10, as an integrated feature within the wireless network, or may be implemented as a standalone device that is independent of any specific wireless network.
The INAC 100 may be implemented as software, hardware, or a combination of hardware and software. The INAC 100 may be implemented on a suitably programmable processor.
The INAC 100 includes equipment identity module 110 that receives and stores identifying information associated with devices 20, the method of which is shown in
The INAC 100 provides, as shown in
Allowed devices are those configured in the NAG 100 as to be allowed wireless service. After determining the identity of the device 20, and determining that the device 20 is an “allowed” device, the INAC 100 redirects the device 20 from the INAC 100 to the appropriate wireless network 10, as shown in
Unknown devices 20 are those not specifically configured by the INAC 100 as allowed or restricted. Unknown devices 20 may be configured to allow normal wireless network access depending, for example, on a security level requirement at a given location (e.g., for homeland security threat conditions of orange and lower, unknown devices are allowed access to the wireless network 10), as shown in
The INAC 100 operates as a local overlay or underlay of the same frequency spectrum and configuration as the wireless network 10. The area of restricted access can extend to any part of the coverage area of the wireless network 10, and such restricted area may be enforced by the use of the power control module 130, directional antennae 30, and repeaters 40. Thus, the restricted area under control of the INAC 100 may be limited to a building, a sports stadium, or a geographical area, for example. The area of restricted wireless access is not necessarily static, and can be changed based on set criteria or at the discretion of a network operator. The end result is a targeted coverage area that can provide controlled and deterministic wireless communications access by subscribers. Once a restricted, or an unknown, subscriber's device 20 leaves the restricted access area, the subscriber's device 20 re-registers with the wireless network 10 and is no longer controlled (locked) by the INAC 100.
When the subscriber's device 20 is locked to the INAC 100, the locking module 125 operates to ensure that the device's display and apparent operation are the same as if the device 20 were registered with the wireless network 10. A subscriber who attempts to use a device 20 locked to the INAC 100 will see a failed access attempt, or similar warning. The subscriber's perception would likely then be that the device 20 was not receiving sufficient signal strength to enable wireless communications or the serving wireless network did not have the requisite capacity to service the access request. This further masks the purpose and operation of the INAC 100. Only after a repeated pattern of access denial is established would the typical subscriber discern the restricted access.
The INAC 100 can be configured to provide various levels of access depending on the configuration of the subscriber devices 20 and the level of security required for the access. The INAC's operational mode may be changed dynamically, either automatically, or manually. Automatic changes may be programmed using the interface 200. Examples of automatic changes are changes programmed into the INAC 100 based on time of day, day of week, or some other calendar-based criteria; the occurrence of a specific event (e.g., a concert); changes in threat levels (e.g., homeland security threat conditions—yellow, orange, etc.); and changes in an operational profile or physical location (of the INAC 100 or of the wireless device 20) (e.g., an aircraft descending below 10,000 feet, a ship entering port, a train arriving at a station). Manual changes may be implemented directly by a system operator by using the interface 200. For any of the modes of operation, the INAC 100 provides a logging mechanism to track all system access attempts and the resulting status. Additionally the INAC 100 provides capability to view the existing database information including the allowed and restricted lists, system configuration, system statistics, and log of system activity.
The INAC's operational modes include disabled, wherein the access restrictions imposable by the INAC 100 are suspended; hold all, or virtual jam, wherein all wireless communications are processed as locked to the INAC 100; unknown allowed, wherein only known “restricted” devices are locked to the INAC 100; and unknown blocked, in which both restricted and unknown devices are locked to the INAC 100.
As subscribers access the INAC 100, and either are locked to the INAC 100 or redirected to the wireless network 10, the INAC 100 captures access information that can be used to generate access reports for each type of device 20 (i.e., unknown, bad, or good). The reports provide an organized analysis as to which users are accessing the system, including time period, call duration, and frequency of use. The reports also provide useful information for establishing system databases and use of the INAC 100.
An optional feature of the INAC 100 is emergency access override to allow processing of emergency access, the method of which is shown in
The INAC 100 provides for location sensitive operations, an example of which, as noted above, involves an aircraft. The INAC 100 may be installed on an aircraft so that certain devices (e.g., those of crew members) may be used for wireless communications at any time. Alternatively, the INAC 100 may be used to control access to wireless communications based on the aircraft's location (latitude, longitude, and altitude) or any aspect or aircraft operation.
The INAC 100 may include an optional security and intercept module 160 that is used for lawful intercept of wireless communications using a direct Internet connection (or other available connection type) to a monitoring station. When enabled at the INAC 100, the security and intercept module 160 allows law enforcement personnel to monitor and record conversations and data transfers (packet and circuit), call signaling messages, accessed features, and SMS originated or terminated messages for targeted wireless devices that are currently locked to the INAC 100 and allowed localized services on the INAC 100 system.
There are many possible deployment options for the INAC 100. For example, the INAC 100 may be implemented as a permanent part of the wireless communications network 10. The INAC 100 also may be implemented as a standalone device that overlays one or more wireless communications networks so that all wireless communications in a specific location are capable of some form of access restriction. One example of this wireless feature is to establish an INAC 100 at a building, a facility, or a campus.
Installation of the INAC 100 as part of a network, or as a standalone device can be permanent or temporary. For example, the INAC 100 may be available as a mobile device, along with the necessary amplifiers, RF distribution, antennae and repeaters, so that a disaster recovery operation may invoke wireless access restrictions in the area where the disaster recovery is taking place. Upon completion of the disaster recovery operations, the access limitation area is disestablished.
When the INAC 100 operates to restrict wireless communications by way of a wireless network, there may still be a need to provide some form of private network communications in the wireless access limited area, the method of which is shown in
The INAC 100 may also provide the capability to individually access the locked wireless devices overtly or covertly thus allowing the exchange of information or enabling the ability to provoke action from the wireless device.
As noted above, the INAC 100 may be used to control wireless access for one wireless technology, and/or for one frequency range, or for multiple technologies and frequency ranges.
This application is a continuation of, and claims priority to: U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/507,675, entitled “Intelligent Network Access Controller and Method,” filed Jul. 19, 2012, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/318,020, now U.S. Pat. No. 8,437,741, entitled “Intelligent Network Access Controller and Method,” filed Dec. 19, 2008; the disclosures of these two applications are hereby incorporated by reference in their entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4790000 | Kinoshita | Dec 1988 | A |
5278890 | Beeson, Jr. et al. | Jan 1994 | A |
5285494 | Sprecher et al. | Feb 1994 | A |
5289179 | Beeson, Jr. et al. | Feb 1994 | A |
5345498 | Mauger et al. | Sep 1994 | A |
5414750 | Bhagat et al. | May 1995 | A |
5420863 | Taketsugu et al. | May 1995 | A |
5440613 | Fuentes | Aug 1995 | A |
5440758 | Grube et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
5440759 | Barnes et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
5465386 | Barnes et al. | Nov 1995 | A |
5490285 | Ahlenius et al. | Feb 1996 | A |
5497411 | Pellerin | Mar 1996 | A |
5519760 | Borkowski et al. | May 1996 | A |
5521962 | Chavez, Jr. | May 1996 | A |
5539730 | Dent | Jul 1996 | A |
5548802 | Barnes et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5550896 | Chavez, Jr. | Aug 1996 | A |
5561841 | Markus | Oct 1996 | A |
5572579 | Orriss et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
5574788 | Childress et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
5577198 | Willrett et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
5590398 | Matthews | Dec 1996 | A |
5592480 | Carney et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
5608854 | Labedz et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
5610969 | McHenry et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
5613196 | Barnes et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
5629978 | Blumhardt et al. | May 1997 | A |
5655001 | Cline et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
5666356 | Fleming et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5711006 | Brochu et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
5729536 | Doshi et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5812955 | Dent et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5845211 | Roach, Jr. | Dec 1998 | A |
5878036 | Spartz et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5920822 | Houde et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5946634 | Korpela | Aug 1999 | A |
5953331 | Duncan et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
6081731 | Boltz et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6188898 | Phillips | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6216014 | Proust et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6272562 | Scott et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6285869 | Shannon et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6343212 | Weber et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6591095 | Palaniswamy et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6603397 | Bronson | Aug 2003 | B2 |
6625455 | Ariga | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6643504 | Chow et al. | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6678516 | Nordman et al. | Jan 2004 | B2 |
6775536 | Geiger et al. | Aug 2004 | B1 |
7006816 | Remy | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7046990 | Grego et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7693536 | Kogure | Apr 2010 | B2 |
8078190 | Noonan et al. | Dec 2011 | B2 |
8254886 | Salkini et al. | Aug 2012 | B2 |
20020098850 | Akhteruzzaman et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20040198310 | Aerrabotu et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040213172 | Myers et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20050190733 | Ishidoshiro | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050272406 | Mizikovsky et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060105758 | Maislos | May 2006 | A1 |
20080008159 | Bourlas et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080057976 | Rae et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080146158 | Pan et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20090069033 | Karstens et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090217047 | Akashika et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20100159877 | Salkini et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100159879 | Salkini et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100228859 | Backstrom et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20130303125 | Salkini et al. | Nov 2013 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1155515 | Jul 2006 | EP |
9742783 | Nov 1997 | WO |
9816054 | Apr 1998 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Fletcher, Anthony G et al., United States Statutory Invention Registration H1,921, “Generic Wireless Telcommunications System,” published Nov. 7, 2000. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20130301574 A1 | Nov 2013 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 13507675 | Jul 2012 | US |
Child | 13939403 | US | |
Parent | 12318020 | Dec 2008 | US |
Child | 13507675 | US |