Patent Grant
7429987
The present invention relates generally to displaying data on a display device. More particularly, the present invention relates to controlling the display of data that is displayed on “tree map” visualizations.
As computer technology advances, computing systems have undertaken the management and processing of larger data systems. With data systems ranging from massive standalone databases to vast distributed networks, oftentimes the limiting factor in analyzing the state of a given system rests not with computing resources, but with the human operator. Specifically, though the computing system may aggregate vast quantities of data in near real-time, in many cases, a human being must visualize the compilation of data to draw effective conclusions from the visualization. Yet, the ability of the end user to digest compiled information varies inversely with the amount of data presented to the end user. Where the amount of compiled data becomes excessive, it can be nearly impossible for a human being to adequately analyze the data.
In an effort to address the foregoing difficulties, tree-map visualization methods have been developed. Initially proposed by Brian Johnson and Ben Shneiderman in the paper, Johnson et al., Tree-Maps: A Space-Filling Approach to the Visualization of Hierarchical Information Structures, Dept. of Computer Science & Human-Interaction Laboratory (University of Maryland June 1991), tree-map visualization techniques map “hierarchical information to a rectangular 2-D display in a space-filling manner” in which the entirety of a designated display space is utilized. Additionally, “[i]nteractive control allows users to specify the presentation of both structural (depth bounds, etc.) and content (display properties such as color mappings) information.” Tree-map visualization techniques can be compared in a contrasting manner to traditional static methods of displaying hierarchically structured information.
According to conventional static methods, a substantial portion of hierarchical information can be hidden from user view to accommodate the view of the hierarchy itself. Alternatively, the entire hierarchy can be visually represented, albeit vast amounts of display space can be obscured, hence wasted, simply to accommodate the structure without regard to the hierarchical data in the hierarchy itself. In the tree-map visualization technique, however, sections of the hierarchy containing more important information can be allocated more display space while portions of the hierarchy which are deemed less important to the specific task at hand can be allocated less space. More particularly, in operation, tree-maps partition the display space into a collection of rectangular bounding boxes representing the tree structure. The drawing of nodes within the bounding boxes can be entirely dependent on the content of the nodes, and can be interactively controlled. Since the display space size is user controlled, the drawing size of each node varies inversely with the size of the tree, for instance the number of nodes. Thus, trees having many nodes can be displayed and manipulated in a fixed display space, yet still be visible even when dealing with 1 million objects.
A further example of the use of a tree map visualization is provided by Fidelity Investments' map of the stock market (which may be found at activequote.fidelity.com/rtrnews/market_map.phtml). In the Fidelity market map, the market is divided into sectors and the sectors are populated with bounding boxes for individual stocks. The size of the bounding boxes is based on the market capitalization of the stock and the color of the boxes are based on the price activity of the stock.
Embodiments of the present invention provide for displaying data from a data set as a tree map visualization. The data in the data set is prioritized so as to associate a priority with respective elements of the data in the data set. A tree map visualization is generated based on the data set where a location of bounding boxes in the tree map is based on the priority associated with the corresponding element.
In further embodiments of the present invention, the tree map visualization is generated so as to display the bounding boxes in a priority based pattern in the tree map. Furthermore, the priority based pattern may be a pattern with either ascending or descending priority diagonally from top to bottom of the tree map visualization.
In still further embodiments of the present invention, the priority associated with a respective element is based on a data value of the data element utilized in generating the tree map. The priority associated with a respective element could also be based on a data value of the data element that is not utilized in generating the tree map. The priority associated with a respective element could be based on metadata associated with the data element.
In particular embodiments of the present invention, prioritizing the data in the data set includes assigning a unique priority value to each element in the data set. The priority associated with a respective element may be dynamically determined. The priority associated with a respective element could also be statically defined.
In additional embodiments of the present invention, the tree map visualization is generated so as to display the bounding boxes based on priority irrespective of whether the locations of the bounding boxes result in complete utilization of available display area for the tree map visualization.
In other embodiments of the present invention, a tree map visualization displayed on a display device is provided that includes a plurality of bounding boxes, wherein a location of respective ones of the bounding boxes in the tree map visualization is based on corresponding priorities associated with the respective ones of the bounding boxes. A size of a bounding box in the plurality of bounding boxes may be based on a first data value associated with the bounding box. A color and/or shade of the bounding box may be based on a second data value associated with the bounding box. The priority corresponding to the bounding box may be a third data value associated with the bounding box. Additionally, the plurality of bounding boxes may be arranged in either ascending or descending priority from top to bottom of the tree map visualization.
In further embodiments of the present invention, the tree map visualization includes at least one void region that does not contain a bounding box.
As will further be appreciated by those of skill in the art, while described above primarily with reference to method aspects, the present invention may be embodied as methods, apparatus/systems and/or computer program products.
The present invention now will be described more fully hereinafter with reference to the accompanying drawings, in which illustrative embodiments of the invention are shown. This invention may, however, be embodied in many different forms and should not be construed as limited to the embodiments set forth herein; rather, these embodiments are provided so that this disclosure will be thorough and complete, and will fully convey the scope of the invention to those skilled in the art. Like numbers refer to like elements throughout.
As will be appreciated by one of skill in the art, the present invention may be embodied as a method, data processing system, or computer program product. Accordingly, the present invention may take the form of an entirely hardware embodiment, an entirely software embodiment or an embodiment combining software and hardware aspects all generally referred to herein as a “circuit” or “module.” Furthermore, the present invention may take the form of a computer program product on a computer-usable storage medium having computer-usable program code embodied in the medium. Any suitable computer readable medium may be utilized including hard disks, CD-ROMs, optical storage devices, a magnetic storage devices.
Computer program code for carrying out operations of the present invention may be written in an object oriented programming language such as Java®, Smalltalk or C++. However, the computer program code for carrying out operations of the present invention may also be written in conventional procedural programming languages, such as the “C” programming language. The program code may execute entirely on the user's computer, partly on the user's computer, as a stand-alone software package, partly on the user's computer and partly on a remote computer or entirely on the remote computer. In the latter scenario, the remote computer may be connected to the user's computer through a local area network (LAN) or a wide area network (WAN), or the connection may be made to an external computer (for example, through the Internet using an Internet Service Provider).
The present invention is described in part below with reference to flowchart illustrations and/or block diagrams of methods, apparatus (systems) and computer program products according to embodiments of the invention. It will be understood that each block of the flowchart illustrations and/or block diagrams, and combinations of blocks in the flowchart illustrations and/or block diagrams, can be implemented by computer program instructions. These computer program instructions may be provided to a processor of a general purpose computer, special purpose computer, or other programmable data processing apparatus to produce a machine, such that the instructions, which execute via the processor of the computer or other programmable data processing apparatus, create means for implementing the functions/acts specified in the flowchart and/or block diagram block or blocks.
These computer program instructions may also be stored in a computer-readable memory that can direct a computer or other programmable data processing apparatus to function in a particular manner, such that the instructions stored in the computer-readable memory produce an article of manufacture including instruction means which implement the function/act specified in the flowchart and/or block diagram block or blocks.
The computer program instructions may also be loaded onto a computer or other programmable data processing apparatus to cause a series of operational steps to be performed on the computer or other programmable apparatus to produce a computer implemented process such that the instructions which execute on the computer or other programmable apparatus provide steps for implementing the functions/acts specified in the flowchart and/or block diagram block or blocks.
Embodiments of the present invention provide for displaying data in tree map format on an electronic display by prioritizing the data to be displayed and displaying the bounding boxes associated with the data in an order reflecting the prioritization. Such prioritized display of bounding boxes may provide a mechanism so as to add additional information to the display of the data so as to allow a user to more readily assess the information displayed. The priority criteria may be based on the data itself, associated data, a characteristic of the data itself and/or may be provided as metadata.
Various embodiments of the present invention will now be described with reference to the figures.
As shown in
As is further seen in
One difficulty with tree map visualizations is that the tree map is created so as to utilize all of the available display area. As such, the location of bounding boxes in the tree map is typically established without reference to the nature of the underlying data. The bounding boxes are typically arranged to utilize all of the available display area. Accordingly, the location of items of interest to a user may change from map to map and related and/or important items may be spread out in the map depending on the distribution of bounding boxes that utilizes all of the available display area.
Embodiments of the present invention provide prioritized display of the data for a tree map visualization so as to display data in the tree map in a predefined pattern that reflects the priority of the item displayed. For example, the data set of Table 1 may be prioritized for display. The determination of priority may be based on the data itself, for example, increasing or decreasing data value, may be determined based on data associated with the data for display, may be based on a characterization and/or classification of the nature of the data being displayed and/or may be specified as a separate priority value. As used herein, the term priority refers to a sequence for display of data and does not necessarily refer to a judgment as to the importance of the data.
The predefined pattern for display based on priority may be any suitable pattern of display. For example, higher priority data may be displayed in an upper left hand corner of the tree map and lower priority data may be displayed in a lower right hand corner of the tree map. Thus, priority may decrease diagonally across the map from left to right and top to bottom. Alternatively, priority could increase or decrease diagonally and from top to bottom. Priority could also increase or decrease on a line by line basis with boxes closer to the left or right sides of a line having a higher priority. Furthermore, the particular pattern may take into account the way in which the data is prioritized so as to provide for a high utilization of the display area. These patterns of display based on a priority are provided as examples. Embodiments of the present invention should not be construed as limited to a particular pattern but is intended to encompass any pattern of display based on priority.
Returning to the example of Table 1, Table 2 below reflects a prioritization of the data from Table 1. The prioritization illustrated in Table 2 is arbitrary, however, as discussed herein, prioritization may be analytically determined and/or user defined. The display of the prioritized tree map data according to certain embodiments of the present invention results in the tree map of
As seen in
As seen in
Utilizing the tree map 400 of
Because the bounding boxes 412 to 468 are arranged in priority order, it may not be possible to completely utilize the display area of the tree map 400. Thus, the tree map 400 has void regions 480, 482 and 484 where no information is displayed. Accordingly, embodiments of the present invention provide a modified tree map where bounding boxes of data elements are arranged in a predefined priority pattern and where all of the available display area is not necessarily utilized to display a bounding box.
The criteria for prioritizing the data from the tree map data set may be a statically defined criteria or may be a dynamically generated criteria. The data may be prioritized based on any suitable analysis of the data, for example, the data may be prioritized based on a series of threshold values. The priority criteria or priority values may be statically set, user specified and/or dynamically determined. The dynamic determination of priority may be provided based on an evaluation of the data values and/or a desired tree map characteristic. For example, the priority may be dynamically set based on an evaluation of the data set.
As mentioned above, the priority of an element of the data set may be based on the values of data that is displayed in the tree map, data associated with the data that is displayed in the tree map and/or metadata associated with the tree map data set. In the first instance, the data may be prioritized based on one or more of the data values that are used in generating the tree map. For instance, in the stock market example, the data may be prioritized based on market capitalization and/or a minimum change in stock price.
The data set could also be prioritized based on additional data associated with the data that generates the tree map. For instance, in the stock market example, the data may be prioritized based on stock market activity where the priority is based on trading activity of a stock.
The data set could also be prioritized based on metadata (i.e. data about the data) associated with the data set that generates the tree map. For example, the data set could be prioritized based on deviation from a standard or average of values of the data in the data set. Similarly, the metadata may directly indicate a priority associated with elements of the data set. For instance, in the stock market example, stocks owned by a user and/or tracked by the user could be identified and prioritized based on whether a stock was owned, tracked and/or not prioritized.
In further embodiments of the present invention, multiple priorities may be used to arrange the bounding boxes in the tree map. For example, right to left could indicate increasing value of a first priority category while bottom to top would indicate increasing priority in a second priority category. In such a case, the upper left corner would contain the bounding box with the highest priority in both categories. In such a case, a hierarchy of the priority categories may need to be defined so as to determine a location between to equally situated bounding boxes.
Embodiments of the present invention have been illustrated with reference to a unique priority being assigned to each data element of the tree map data set. However, in further embodiments of the present invention, different data elements in the tree map data set may have the same priority. In such a case, the location of display within the priority pattern of bounding boxes having the same priority may be established arbitrarily or based on another criteria, such as to maximize display utilization or a second priority criteria. However, such bounding boxes will still be displayed in priority order with respect to bounding boxes having a higher or lower priority. Accordingly, the present invention should not be construed as limited to the assignment of unique priorities.
The flowcharts and block diagrams of
In the drawings and specification, there have been disclosed typical illustrative embodiments of the invention and, although specific terms are employed, they are used in a generic and descriptive sense only and not for purposes of limitation, the scope of the invention being set forth in the following claims.
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 5515487 | Beaudet et al. | May 1996 | A |
| 5570460 | Ramanujam | Oct 1996 | A |
| 5577188 | Zhu | Nov 1996 | A |
| 5581797 | Baker et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
| 5786820 | Robertson | Jul 1998 | A |
| 5917492 | Bereiter et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
| 5950168 | Simborg et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
| 6055515 | Consentino et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
| 6101279 | Nguyen et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
| 6104400 | Halachmi et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
| 6151024 | Alimpich et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
| 6151595 | Pirolli et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
| 6211880 | Impink, Jr. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
| 6216134 | Heckerman et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
| 6278464 | Kohavi et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
| 6281896 | Alimpich et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
| 6297824 | Hearst et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
| 6301579 | Becker | Oct 2001 | B1 |
| 6307573 | Barros | Oct 2001 | B1 |
| 6314424 | Kaczmarski et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
| 6341280 | Glass et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
| 6348935 | Malacinski et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
| 6373484 | Orell et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
| 6380937 | Dong et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
| 6380957 | Banning | Apr 2002 | B1 |
| 6448985 | McNally | Sep 2002 | B1 |
| 6466918 | Spiegel et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
| 6470383 | Leshem et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
| 6489968 | Ortega et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
| 6583794 | Wattenberg | Jun 2003 | B1 |
| 20020091684 | Nomiyama et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
| 20030085931 | Card et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
| 20030158846 | Ikehata et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
| 20030200347 | Weitzman | Oct 2003 | A1 |
| 20040070627 | Shahine et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
| 20040088678 | Litoiu et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
| 20040168115 | Bauernschmidt et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
| 20040212615 | Uthe | Oct 2004 | A1 |
| 20040212616 | Uthe | Oct 2004 | A1 |
| 20040263513 | Smith et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
| Number | Date | Country |
|---|---|---|
| WO 0108053 | Feb 2001 | WO |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20050066289 A1 | Mar 2005 | US |
