The present invention relates to pressure relief devices, and particularly to a device capable of providing upstream self-relieving of body cavity overpressure for double isolation valves.
Isolation valves are designed to provide a double isolation barrier; typically, this is achieved either with double piston effect seats (ball or slab gate) valves or with double expanding gate valves. Both of these valve types are non-self-relieving. In fact, each seat is designed to provide a tight seal regardless of whether the pressure is acting from line-to-body or from body-to-line. This means that an eventual overpressure is retained in the body cavity by the specific seat design.
When double barrier isolation valves are exposed to thermal sources (such as, for example, radiation, proximity to hot equipment, and the like), the rise of valve body temperature can lead to an unacceptable increase in pressure.
The present pressure relief device maintains the valve body cavity pressure within acceptable limits.
An important issue in pressure relief device design is where the excess of pressure should be directed. Assuming that release to the atmosphere is not practicable, the aim is to convey the excess fluid from the cavity to the high pressure (HP) side of the valve. In fact, the low pressure side should be isolated by the shut-off valve, which when closed has the function of preventing fluid from entering the low pressure conduit.
In general, however, such isolation valves are bi-directional. In other words, either valve end can be the HP side when the valve is closed. What is needed, is a pressure relief device that can discern or “understand” which is the actual high pressure side and convey the body overpressure toward the HP side.
A pressure relief device comprises a body having a pocket formed therein, with a first, second, and third fluid communication formed therein. In some embodiments, the first and second fluid communication are connected to the pocket at opposite ends thereof and the third fluid communication is connected to the pocket at a central portion thereof In other or the same embodiments, the first fluid communication is between the pocket and a first valve end, the second fluid communication is between the pocket and a second valve end, and the third fluid communication is between the pocket and a body cavity within the valve.
In at least some embodiments, there is a spring mechanism within the pocket, allowing for fluid exchange between the first and third fluid communication when said spring mechanism is in a first set of positions.
In at least some embodiments, there is a spring mechanism within the pocket, allowing for fluid exchange between the second and third fluid communication when said spring mechanism is in a second set of positions.
In at least some embodiments, there is a spring mechanism within the pocket, allowing for no fluid exchange between any of the first, second, or third fluid communications when said spring mechanism is in a third set of positions.
In some embodiments, a pressure relief device for a double isolation valve comprises a body with a valve cavity. The device has a pocket formed therein. A disc is disposed in the central section of the pocket. In some embodiments, the disc is interposed between two spring-actuated seats. Each of the seats is in fluid communication with opposing valve sides of the valve body. The pocket central section is in fluid communication with the valve body cavity. Each of the seats is provided with two different types of gaskets in series.
In operation, reverse pressure causes retraction of the seats, thereby relieving valve body cavity overpressure. Reverse pressure is the pressure that exists where the valve body cavity connects to the pressure relief device. Reverse pressure occurs as a result of built-up overpressure in the valve body cavity. Built-up overpressure is generated when the pressure increases over the design value (for example due to temperature effects).
In a preferred pressure relief device, each of the seats is shouldered into the body. More preferably, the seats are shouldered into the body by metal-to-metal contact. The seats are preferably piston-effect type and positively energized by pressure directed toward the disc.
Turning first to
In
The spring mechanism within pocket 120 also allows for fluid exchange between the second and third fluid communication when said spring mechanism in a second set of positions. This occurs when the pressure in the second fluid communication is greater than the pressure in the first fluid communication.
The spring mechanism within pocket 120 also allows for no fluid exchange between any of the first, second, or third fluid communications when said spring mechanism is in a third set of positions. This occurs when the first and second fluid communications have pressures within a specified tolerance of equilibrium. Minor deviations from equilibrium pressure beneath this tolerance will result in only partial actuation of the spring biasing mechanism, and the fluid exchange between the valve body cavity and the high-pressure side of the valve is disabled under these circumstances. In some embodiments, this tolerance is set by the mechanical properties of the spring(s) contained within the spring biasing mechanism
In some embodiments when an isolation valve is closed, fluid can become trapped within valve body cavity 130. Reverse pressure occurs as a result of built-up overpressure in valve body cavity 130. Built-up overpressure is generated when the pressure increases over the design value (for example due to temperature effects). Intelligent pressure relief device 100 vents this overpressure in valve body cavity 130 to the higher-pressure end of the valve. As shown in
Each of seats 108a, 108b is in direct connection with the respective valve end, as shown by the arrows depicting the flow of fluid to valve end 125a and valve end 125b of valve body 102 shown and described previously with respect to
As further shown in
Seats 108a, 108b can be piston-effect type components that are positively energized by pressure exerted toward disc 104. Reverse pressure causes retraction of seats 108a, 108b, thereby allowing relief of overpressure developed in the main cavity of valve body 102. (See
In some embodiments, pressure relief device 100 works when pressure in first transverse duct 112a and/or second transverse duct 112b causes disc 104 and seats 108a-b to be biased against the valve side with lower pressure. In these situations, pressure in valve body cavity 130 can enter pocket 120. If the pressure in valve body cavity 120 is higher than the pressure on the higher pressure side of valve, then the seat 108a-b associated with the higher pressure side of the valve is pushed back, establishing fluid communication directly between valve body cavity 130 and the higher pressure side of the valve, through pocket 120, and relevant selection of transverse ducts, until a state of pressure equilibrium has been achieved within a pre-specified tolerance. In some embodiments, this tolerance is set by the mechanical properties of the spring(s) contained within the spring biasing mechanism. Then, the biasing mechanism such as spring 110a-b closes the gap between disc 104 and seat 108a-b.
The present intelligent pressure relief device has the following distinguishing features and benefits:
While particular elements, embodiments and applications of the present invention have been shown and described, it will be understood, of course, that the invention is not limited thereto since modifications can be made by those skilled in the art without departing from the scope of the present disclosure, particularly in light of the foregoing teachings.
This application is a continuation in part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/731,404 filed on Jun. 4, 2015, entitled “Intelligent Pressure Relief Device For A Double Isolation Valve”. The '404 application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/117,004 filed on May 26, 2011, also entitled “Intelligent Pressure Relief Device For A Double Isolation Valve”. The '004 application claimed priority benefits, in turn, from U.S. provisional patent application Ser. No. 61/348,692 filed on May 26, 2010, entitled “Intelligent Pressure Relief Valve”. Each of the '004, '404 and '692 applications is hereby incorporated by reference herein in its entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2071969 | Diescher | Feb 1937 | A |
2351140 | McCloy | Jun 1944 | A |
2489799 | Minshall | Nov 1949 | A |
2539913 | Koepcke | Jan 1951 | A |
2634743 | Audemar | Apr 1953 | A |
2765181 | Butterfield | Oct 1956 | A |
2774369 | Di Tirro | Dec 1956 | A |
2955613 | Block | Oct 1960 | A |
2983278 | Heintz | May 1961 | A |
3009477 | Bentley | Nov 1961 | A |
3023782 | Chaves, Jr. | Mar 1962 | A |
3044480 | Lee | Jul 1962 | A |
3145723 | Chorkey | Aug 1964 | A |
3203447 | Bremner | Aug 1965 | A |
3339579 | Lewis | Sep 1967 | A |
3348563 | Sidles, Jr. | Oct 1967 | A |
3437065 | Robbins, Jr. | Apr 1969 | A |
3454028 | Baatrup | Jul 1969 | A |
3454029 | Fredd | Jul 1969 | A |
3586030 | Nordin | Jun 1971 | A |
3633606 | Hay | Jan 1972 | A |
3734132 | Kuhnelt | May 1973 | A |
3880185 | Harrison | Apr 1975 | A |
4003397 | Cooper | Jan 1977 | A |
4033375 | Hirsch | Jul 1977 | A |
4128113 | Hart | Dec 1978 | A |
4191215 | Gonner | Mar 1980 | A |
4193418 | Meyer | Mar 1980 | A |
4352367 | Pollman | Oct 1982 | A |
4439984 | Martin | Apr 1984 | A |
4463775 | Wittren | Aug 1984 | A |
4562861 | Payton | Jan 1986 | A |
4739790 | Clarke | Apr 1988 | A |
4759261 | Flieter | Jul 1988 | A |
4830331 | Vindum | May 1989 | A |
4967794 | Tsutsui | Nov 1990 | A |
5144982 | Willbanks | Sep 1992 | A |
5152312 | Kogel | Oct 1992 | A |
5454698 | Yokoi | Oct 1995 | A |
7159605 | Thrash, Jr. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7318448 | Fleischer et al. | Jan 2008 | B2 |
20050028869 | Roth et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20100032036 | Quendt et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1106880 | Jun 2001 | EP |
1998055784 | Dec 1998 | WO |
2009150495 | Dec 2009 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Intemational Search Report and Written Opinion dated Oct. 18, 2011 in connection with International Application No. PCT/EP2011/058637. |
European Office Action dated Jan. 18, 2013 in connection with European Patent Application No. 11721539.2. |
First Office Action dated Dec. 23, 2013 in connection with Chinese Patent Application No. 201180025893.X. |
Canadian Office Action dated Apr. 30, 2014 in connection with Canadian Patent Application No. 2,800,110. |
Patent Examination Report No. 1 dated Jul. 22, 2104 in connection with Australian Patent Application No. 2011257209. |
Patent Examination Report No. 2 dated Oct. 9, 2014 in connection with Australian Patent Application No. 2011257209. |
Patent Examination Report No. 3 dated Nov. 5, 2014 in connection with Australian Patent Application No. 2011257209. |
Norwegian Office Action and Search Report dated Apr. 16, 2016 in connection with Norwegian Patent Application No. 20121393. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20170234442 A1 | Aug 2017 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61348692 | May 2010 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 13117004 | May 2011 | US |
Child | 14731404 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 14731404 | Jun 2015 | US |
Child | 15365939 | US |