The application relates generally to gas turbine engines and, more particularly, to a frequency mistuned integrally bladed rotor (IBR).
Integrally bladed rotors (IBR), also known as blisks, comprises a circumferential row of blades integrally formed in the periphery of a hub. The blades in the row are typically machined such as to have the same airfoil shape. However, it has been found that the uniformity between the blades increases flutter susceptibility. Flutter may occur when two or more adjacent blades in a blade row vibrate at a frequency close to their natural vibration frequency and the vibration motion between the adjacent blades is substantially in phase.
One solution proposed in the past to avoid flutter instability is to mistune the IBR by cropping the leading edge tip of some of the blades around the hub. However, this solution is not fully satisfactory from an aerodynamic and a manufacturing point of view.
Accordingly, there is a need to provide a new frequency mistuning method suited for integrally bladed rotors.
It is therefore an object to provide an integrally bladed rotor (IBR) for a gas turbine engine, comprises a hub and a circumferential row of blades projecting integrally from said hub, the row including an even number of blades alternating between blades having first and second airfoil definitions around the hub, each blade having a pressure side and a suction side disposed on opposed sides of a median axis and extending between a trailing edge and a leading edge, the first and second airfoil definitions being different and having respective pressure side thicknesses T1 and T2 defined between respective median axes and respective pressure sides of the blades, the pressure side thickness T1 of the first airfoil definition being greater than the pressure side thickness T2 of the second airfoil definition.
In another aspect, there is provided a frequency mistuned integrally bladed rotor (IBR) for a gas turbine engine, comprising a hub and a circumferential row of blades of varying frequency projecting integrally from the hub, the row including an even number of blades, each blade in the row alternate with another blade having a different pressure surface definition but substantially identical suction surface, leading edge and trailing edge definitions.
In a third aspect, there is provided a method of reducing vibration in an gas turbine engine integrally bladed rotor (IBR) having a circumferential row of blades extending integrally from a hub, the circumferential row of blades comprising an even number of blades; the method comprising varying the natural frequency of the blades around the hub in an alternate pattern by providing first and second distinct airfoil profiles around the hub, the first and second profiles having similar suction side, leading edge and trailing edge profiles but a different pressure side profile.
Reference is now made to the accompanying figures, in which:
The blade row 24 has an even number of blades and is composed of two groups of blades 28 and 30 which are designed to have different natural vibration frequencies in order to avoid flutter instability. The blades 28 and 30 are disposed in an alternate fashion around the hub 22. The difference in frequency between blades 28 and 30 results from the blades 28 and 30 having different airfoil geometries. More particularly, the blades 28 and 30 can be mistuned relative to one another by milling a different surface geometry in the pressure side 32 of blades 30. The differences between the airfoil geometries of blades 28 and 30 can be better illustrated by superposing an airfoil section of one of the first group of blades 28 over a corresponding airfoil section of one of the blades of the second group of blades 30, as for instance shown in
Referring to
The thickness of the pressure surface 32 of the blades 28 and 30 can be defined by the distance of the pressure surface from a chord-wise median axis A of the blades. As can be appreciated from
The thickening of the pressure side 32a of the blades 30 reduces the cross- section area of every other interblade passage 26 around the hub 22 of the IBR 20. Indeed, the flow passage area between the pressure surface 32b of a first one of the blades 28 and the suction surface 34 of the adjacent blade 30 is greater than the flow passage area of the pressure surface 32a of this adjacent blade 30 and the suction surface 34 of the next blade 28.
The intentional mistuning of the blades 28 and 30 provides passive flutter control by changing both mechanical and aerodynamic blade-to-blade energy transfer of the IBR during the full range of the gas turbine engine operation. The mistuning of blades 28 and 30 makes it more difficult for the blades to vibrate at the same frequency, thereby reducing flutter susceptibility. This provides for two different airfoil definitions incorporated into one component.
Thickening the pressure surface of the blades allows to effectively mistuning the blades of the IBR in order to avoid flutter instability and that without negatively affecting the aerodynamic efficiency of the IBR and still providing for easy manufacturing of the IBRs. This approach has also been found been found satisfactory from a structural point of view.
The above description is meant to be exemplary only, and one skilled in the art will recognize that changes may be made to the embodiments described without departing from the scope of the invention disclosed. Other modifications which fall within the scope of the present invention will be apparent to those skilled in the art, in light of a review of this disclosure, and such modifications are intended to fall within the appended claims.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2870958 | Pinsley | Jan 1959 | A |
3536417 | Stiefel et al. | Oct 1970 | A |
4097192 | Kulina | Jun 1978 | A |
4732532 | Schwaller et al. | Mar 1988 | A |
4878810 | Evans | Nov 1989 | A |
5286168 | Smith | Feb 1994 | A |
5478205 | Chou et al. | Dec 1995 | A |
5524341 | Ferleger et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
5667361 | Yaeger et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
6042338 | Brafford et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6379112 | Montgomery | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6428278 | Montgomery et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6471482 | Montgomery et al. | Oct 2002 | B2 |
6719530 | Chow | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6854959 | Barb | Feb 2005 | B2 |
7147437 | Burdgick et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7500299 | Dupeux et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20100247310 A1 | Sep 2010 | US |