1. Field of the Invention
The present invention is related to node status monitoring in distributed computing systems, and more specifically to a scheme of node status sharing by gossiping among the nodes.
2. Description of Related Art
In large-scale distributed computer systems, such as those using distributed software models to perform tasks, multiple nodes provide independent execution of sub-tasks. In order to keep such a system operational, and further, to provide for proper operation of distributed applications that use the multiple nodes to perform various tasks, the status of nodes is tracked. In particular, in order to assign tasks to nodes, and in order to ensure that a node is available to communicate with to perform a task, the operational status of the nodes and their ability to communicate with the other nodes must be monitored.
Communications and status monitoring is typically centralized, with a monitoring application providing information about node and interface status. The monitoring application may use distributed agents to perform the monitoring on each node. Heartbeat messages are typically sent from the nodes to a centralized manager that maintains a record of the status of each node.
The invention provides a node status monitoring system and method that is embodied in a computer-performed method. The method communicates node status information among the nodes by gossiping, eliminating the need for a central clearinghouse or monitoring facility.
The method determines node operating status among a cluster of nodes of a computer system by transmitting gossip messages directly between node pairs in the cluster. The gossip messages include an indication of other nodes in the cluster of nodes that are operational. When a node has not received a gossip message from another node for a predetermined period of time, the, the local status for the other node is set to non-operational, and a message indicating that the other node is down is sent to each of the other nodes in the cluster. If another node has received a status message within the predetermined period of time and receives the node down message, then the other node sends a node alive message to the other nodes.
The foregoing and other objectives, features, and advantages of the invention will be apparent from the following, more particular, description of the preferred embodiments of the invention, as illustrated in the accompanying drawings.
The novel features believed characteristic of the invention are set forth in the appended claims. The invention itself, however, as well as a preferred mode of use, further objectives, and advantages thereof, will best be understood by reference to the following detailed description of the invention when read in conjunction with the accompanying Figures, wherein like reference numerals indicate like components, and:
The present invention encompasses techniques for monitoring communication status in clusters of nodes within distributed computing systems. In particular, embodiments of the invention provide determining the operational status of the nodes in the cluster by sending gossiping messages between the nodes, containing indications of the status of other nodes. When a node has not received a gossip message from a particular node for a predetermined time period, the node sends a message that the particular node is down. If another node has received a gossip message from the particular node in the predetermined time period, that other node sends a message to the other nodes indicating that the particular node is alive. Thus, the present invention provides a self-correcting and robust node status information sharing system. Other features that may be incorporated in the gossiping methodology will be described in further detail below.
Referring now to
Referring now to
Referring now to
Gossip message CMD_GOSSIP is transmitted between all of the node pairs on a regular basis within the cluster of nodes. For each node that has an operational status at the transmitting node, the node number and the sequence number of the most recently received reliable, i.e., operational, transmission are inserted in the message data. The gossip message itself is not considered a reliable transmission, as the gossip messages form part of the status monitoring, so the sequence number represents the last actual operational transmission from the specified node. When a node receives a gossip message from another node, the node numbers and sequence numbers provided from the other node are used to update a local database, which may be a table, that contains the status and message sequence number information for the other nodes, as well as an indication of the time elapsed since the node has received a gossip message from each other node. There are essentially two checks in this scheme: first, the nodes expect to receive, and time the reception of, gossip messages from each other node in the cluster; and second, the nodes receive information about all nodes in the cluster and their most recently received operational messages from each other node in the cluster, providing a very robust status sharing methodology.
Node status message CMD_NODE_DOWN is transmitted from a node to all other nodes in the cluster when a node determines that a gossip message has not been received from a particular node for a predetermined time period. The time period may be determined from a timer, a comparison of a time count to a stored timestamp corresponding to the particular node, a count of gossip message intervals determined from gossip messages received from other nodes (other than the particular node), or other suitable technique for determining that too much time has passed since the last gossip message from the particular node in question. In
Message CMD_RXT is used to obtain operational messages from another node that were somehow missed. Each node retains operational messages in retransmit queues, one for each other node in the cluster. The entries in the retransmit queues are only removed when their sequence numbers have been indicated in gossip messages as having been received by each node in the cluster. Since each gossip message contains sequence numbers for each node, each gossip message causes the latest sequence number for each node to be updated. If the sequence number changes for a node, the corresponding retransmit queue is inspected and entries are removed up to and including the message indicated by the newly entered sequence number. Thus, message CMD_RXT and the data retention in queues at each node provide an acknowledgement system that ensures that at least temporary communications errors are recoverable.
Referring now to
As noted above, the present invention may be embodied as a system, method, and/or a computer program product. A computer program product may be embodied in firmware, an image in system memory or another memory/cache, stored on a fixed or re-writable media such as an optical disc having computer-readable code stored thereon. Any combination of one or more computer readable medium(s) may be used to store the program instructions in accordance with an embodiment of the invention. The computer readable medium may be a computer readable signal medium or a computer readable storage medium. A computer readable storage medium may be, for example, but not limited to, an electronic, magnetic, optical, electromagnetic, infrared, or semiconductor system, apparatus, or device, or any suitable combination of the foregoing. More specific examples (a non-exhaustive list) of the computer readable storage medium would include the following: an electrical connection having one or more wires, a portable computer diskette, a hard disk, a random access memory (RAM), a read-only memory (ROM), an erasable programmable read-only memory (EPROM or Flash memory), an optical fiber, a portable compact disc read-only memory (CD-ROM), an optical storage device, a magnetic storage device, or any suitable combination of the foregoing.
In the context of the present application, a computer readable storage medium may be any tangible medium that can contain, or store a program for use by or in connection with an instruction execution system, apparatus, or device. A computer readable signal medium may include a propagated data signal with computer readable program code embodied therein, for example, in baseband or as part of a carrier wave. Such a propagated signal may take any of a variety of forms, including, but not limited to, electro-magnetic, optical, or any suitable combination thereof. A computer readable signal medium may be any computer readable medium that is not a computer readable storage medium and that can communicate, propagate, or transport a program for use by or in connection with an instruction execution system, apparatus, or device. Program code embodied on a computer readable medium may be transmitted using any appropriate medium, including but not limited to wireless, wireline, optical fiber cable, RF, or any suitable combination of the foregoing.
Computer program code for carrying out operations for aspects of the present invention may be written in any combination of one or more programming languages, including an object oriented programming language such as Java, Smalltalk, C++ or the like and conventional procedural programming languages, such as the “C” programming language or similar programming languages.
While the invention has been particularly shown and described with reference to the preferred embodiments thereof, it will be understood by those skilled in the art that the foregoing and other changes in form and details may be made therein without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention.
The present Application is a Continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/425,764, filed on Mar. 21, 2012, and issued as U.S. Pat. No. 8,806,007 on Aug. 12, 2014 which is a Continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/959,581, filed on Dec. 3, 2010, and issued as U.S. Pat. No. 8,433,760 on Apr. 30, 2013, and claims priority thereto under 35 U.S.C. §120. The disclosure of the above-referenced parent U.S. Patent Application is incorporated herein by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
6031817 | Moy | Feb 2000 | A |
6185613 | Lawson et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6411967 | Van Renesse | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6591317 | Schzukin et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6778504 | Santry et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6862619 | Sugauchi et al. | Mar 2005 | B1 |
6983324 | Block et al. | Jan 2006 | B1 |
7058957 | Nguyen | Jun 2006 | B1 |
7451359 | Coekaerts | Nov 2008 | B1 |
7539755 | Li et al. | May 2009 | B2 |
7542437 | Redi et al. | Jun 2009 | B1 |
7571230 | Gissel et al. | Aug 2009 | B2 |
7590898 | Coekaerts | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7624194 | Kakivaya et al. | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7664125 | Bauer et al. | Feb 2010 | B1 |
7738364 | Bain | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7856480 | Muchow | Dec 2010 | B2 |
8108715 | Agarwal | Jan 2012 | B1 |
8161053 | Khan et al. | Apr 2012 | B1 |
8384549 | Lemmon | Feb 2013 | B2 |
8433760 | Ganapathy et al. | Apr 2013 | B2 |
8806007 | Ganapathy et al. | Aug 2014 | B2 |
20020156882 | Natarajan et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020178275 | Hein et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20030061340 | Sun et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030088831 | Bauer et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030093516 | Parsons et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030105801 | Tse et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030105850 | Lean et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030158921 | Hare et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030225840 | Glassco et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20030233594 | Earl | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040008727 | See et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040030775 | Lauzon et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040064835 | Bellwood et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040172467 | Wechter et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20050050098 | Barnett | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050065953 | Bower et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050076145 | Ben-Zvi et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050152396 | Pichna et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050234929 | Ionescu et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20060031282 | Tuttle et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060050629 | Saika | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20070041328 | Bell, IV | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070140243 | Eastham | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070226182 | Sobotka et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20080077635 | Sporny et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080183857 | Barfield et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080317050 | Xiong et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090043887 | Coekaerts | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090070617 | Arimilli | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090138808 | Moromisato et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090199051 | Jann et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20100115338 | Rao et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100223492 | Farrugia et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100281304 | Moyer et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100290469 | Assarpour | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100332277 | Dentzer et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110093743 | Arcese et al. | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110202500 | Warn et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110274053 | Baik et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20120047257 | Hauser | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120144018 | Fried et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120203897 | Mishra et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120203899 | Ganapathy et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
WO2004031979 | Apr 2004 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Van Renesse, et al., “A gossip-style failure detection service”, Proceedings of the IFIP International Conference on Distributed Systems Platforms and Open Distributed Processing, 2009, pp. 1-16, Springer Verlag, Illinois. |
Office Action in U.S. Appl. No. 12/959,581 mailed on Aug. 10, 2010, 23 pages (pp. 1-23 in pdf). |
Notice of Allowance in U.S. Appl. No. 12/959,581 mailed on Dec. 28, 2012, 9 pages (pp. 1-9 in pdf). |
Office Action in U.S. Appl. No. 13/425,764 mailed on Jul. 8, 2013, 16 pages (pp. 1-16 in pdf). |
Notice of Allowance in U.S. Appl. No. 13/425,764 mailed on Apr. 1, 2014, 6 pages (pp. 1-6 in pdf). |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20140310410 A1 | Oct 2014 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 13425764 | Mar 2012 | US |
Child | 14314146 | US | |
Parent | 12959581 | Dec 2010 | US |
Child | 13425764 | US |