Inter-object messaging

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 6651109
  • Patent Number
    6,651,109
  • Date Filed
    Wednesday, October 11, 2000
    24 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, November 18, 2003
    21 years ago
Abstract
A method of communication between a first object and a second object is disclosed. A first direct method call is made on an intermediary object from the first object. The first direct method call contains information regarding a location in memory of the intermediary object instead of a location in memory of the second object and a name of the method to be called on the second object. The name of the method to be called on the second object is delivered from the intermediary object to a message queue object. The name of the method to be called on the second object is accessed from the message queue object by the second object.
Description




FIELD OF THE INVENTION




The present invention relates to object oriented programming. More specifically, the present invention relates to a secure method of communication between untrusted JAVA™ objects.




BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION




JAVA™ is a portable language that generates intermediate code that can be downloaded and run on a machine with a JAVA™ interpreter. The portability of JAVA™ applets allows processing to be off-loaded to a local system that has the potential capability of performing the processing at a faster rate than the source of the applet.




Because applets are designed to be loaded from a remote site and then executed locally, security is an important issue. In order to prevent untrusted code from damaging the local system, web browsers with JAVA™ interpreters often implement safeguards that restrict what applets can do. Some safeguards include, preventing applets from running any local executable program and preventing applets from communicating with any host other than their originating host. Other safeguards include preventing applets from reading or writing the local computer's file system and preventing applets from finding information about the local client system other than the JAVA™ version used, the name and version of the operating system, the characters used to separate files, paths, and lines.




The safeguards implemented by web browsers, however, are ineffective in providing a secure method of communication between untrusted objects from the untrusted code and objects in the local system. The safeguards implemented by current web browsers allow trusted objects to communicate with other trusted objects in the local system by making direct method calls directly on the objects in the local system. Direct method calls are messages from one object to another that request the receiving object to carry out one of its methods. A direct method call typically consists of three parts: a reference to the receiver object, the name of the method in the receiver object to be executed, and any parameters that the method may require to fulfill its charge. If untrusted objects were allowed to make direct method calls to other objects in the local system, untrusted objects could potentially do damage to a file system, a network, invoke methods in an inappropriate manner, or negatively affect other parts of the local system.




Thus, a method for inter-object communication among objects that minimizes the dangers associated with allowing untrusted objects to make direct method calls is desired.




SUMMARY




A method of communication between a first object and a second object is disclosed. A first direct method call is made on an intermediary object from the first object. The first direct method call contains information regarding a location in memory of the intermediary object instead of a location in memory of the second object and a name of the method to be called on the second object. The name of the method to be called on the second object is delivered from the intermediary object to a message queue object. The name of the method to be called on the second object is accessed from the message queue object by the second object.




A method for requesting a channel of communication with a receiver object via a trusted intermediary is disclosed. A first direct method call is made to a session object to request a channel with the receiver object. A location in memory of a channel object is received from the session object on behalf of the receiver object.




A method of allocating a channel of communication is disclosed. A direct method call is received from a session object on behalf of a sender object requesting a channel of communication. The direct method call contains an object identifier (ID) of the sender object. A degree of access to grant the sender object is determined. A channel object with the degree of access appropriate for the sender object is created. A location in memory of the channel object is returned to the session object.




A method for arbitrating a channel of communication between a first object and a second object is disclosed. A first direct method call is received from the first object requesting a channel of communication with the second object. The first direct method call contains an object identifier (ID) of the first object and the second object. A second direct method call is made to the second object requesting the channel of communication on behalf of the first object. A location in memory of a channel object is received from the second object. The location in memory of the channel object is sent to the first object.











DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS




The present invention is illustrated by way of example and not by way of illustration in the figures of the accompanying drawings, in which like references indicate similar elements and in which:





FIG. 1

illustrates a network in which the present invention is implemented;





FIG. 2

illustrates a block diagram of a computer system implementing an embodiment of the present invention;





FIG. 3

illustrates how a channel of communication is negotiated according to an embodiment of the present invention;





FIG. 4

illustrates how inter-object messaging is performed according to an embodiment of the present invention;





FIG. 5

is a flow chart illustrating a method for establishing a channel of communication between a first object and a second object; and





FIG. 6

is a flow chart illustrating a method for inter-object communication.











DETAILED DESCRIPTION




A method and apparatus for providing secure communication between untrusted objects is described. In the following descriptions, for the purposes of explanation, numerous specific details are set forth in order to provide a thorough understanding of the present invention. It will be apparent, however, to one skilled in the art that the present invention may be practiced without these specific details. In other instances, well-known structures and devices are shown in block diagram form in order to avoid unnecessarily obscuring the present invention.




NETWORK OVERVIEW





FIG. 1

illustrates an exemplary network upon which an embodiment of the present invention is implemented. The network


100


includes a server


110


and a plurality of clients


130


-


133


. The server


110


and the clients


130


-


133


interface with one another via transmission medium


120


. In one embodiment of the present invention, transmission medium


120


provides an Internet connection. In an alternate embodiment of the present invention, transmission medium


120


provides other network connections.




The network


100


supports a multi-user communication infrastructure wherein objects in each of the clients


130


-


133


are downloaded and replicated onto the other clients


130


-


133


via the transmission medium


120


and the server


110


. This provides a basic symmetry between the clients


130


-


133


and the server


110


and allows the processing of events to be done on each of the clients


130


-


133


instead of on the server


110


. Objects that are replicated from other clients are considered untrusted objects. For example, objects originating from clients


131


-


133


that are replicated onto client


130


are considered by the client


130


to be untrusted objects. Likewise, objects originating from client


130


that are replicated onto clients


131


-


133


are considered by the clients


131


-


133


to be untrusted objects. According to an embodiment of the present invention, a method of communication is provided to allow a first object originating from a first client


130


to communicate with a second object originating from a second client


131


without giving the first object a location in memory of the second object. The methods that are requested by the first object on the second are routed to a trusted object created by the second object. Further, the first object cannot create or otherwise obtain a reference to the second object.




HARDWARE OVERVIEW




Referring to

FIG. 2

, an exemplary computer system upon which an embodiment of the present invention can be implemented is shown. The computer system


200


may be configured to be the server


110


or one of the clients


130


-


133


illustrated in FIG.


1


. The computer system


200


comprises a processor


201


that processes digital data The processor


201


can be a complex instruction set computing (CISC) microprocessor, a reduced instruction set computing (RISC) microprocessor, a very long instruction word (VLIW) microprocessor, a processor implementing a combination of instruction sets, or other processor device. The processor


201


is coupled to a CPU bus


210


which transmits signals between the processor


201


and other components in the computer system


200


. In an alternate embodiment of the present invention, the computer system


200


includes a plurality of processors.




For the illustrated embodiment, a memory


213


comprises a dynamic random access memory (DRAM) device, a static random access memory (SRAM) device, or other memory devices. The memory


213


stores information or other intermediate data during execution by the processor


201


. A bridge memory controller


211


is coupled to the CPU bus


210


and the memory


213


. The bridge memory controller


111


directs data traffic between the processor


201


, the memory


213


, and other components in the client computer system


110


and bridges signals from these components to a high speed I/O bus


220


.




For the illustrated embodiment, the high speed I/O bus


220


supports peripherals operating at high data throughput rates. The bus


220


can be a single bus or a combination of multiple buses. As an example, the bus


220


can comprise a Peripheral Components Interconnect (PCI) bus, a Personal Computer Memory Card International Association (PCMCIA) bus, or other buses. The bus


220


provides communication links between components in the computer system


200


. A network controller


221


links a network of computers together and provides communication among the machines. A display device controller


222


is coupled to the high speed I/O bus


220


. The display device controller


222


allows coupling of a display device to the computer system


200


and acts as an interface between the display device and the computer system


200


. The display device receives information and data from the processor


201


through the display device controller


222


and displays the information and data to the user of the computer system


200


.




For the illustrated embodiment, a bus bridge


223


couples the high speed I/O bus


220


to I/O bus


230


. The bus bridge


223


comprises a translator to bridge signals between the high speed I/O bus


220


and the I/O bus


230


.




The I/O bus


230


is used for communicating information between peripheral devices which operate at lower throughput rates. The I/O bus


230


can be a single bus or a combination of multiple buses. As an example, the bus


230


can comprise an Industry Standard Architecture (ISA) bus, an Extended Industry Standard Architecture (EISA) bus or a Micro Channel Architecture (MCA) bus. The bus


230


provides communication links between components in the computer system


200


. A keyboard interface


232


can be a keyboard controller or other keyboard interface. The keyboard interface


232


can be a dedicated device or can reside in another device such as a bus controller or other controller. The keyboard interface


232


allows coupling of a keyboard to the computer system and transmits signals from a keyboard to the computer system


200


. A data storage device


231


can be a hard disk drive, a floppy disk drive, a CD-ROM device, a flash memory device or other mass storage device. An audio controller


233


operates to coordinating the recording and playing of sounds is also coupled to I/O bus


230


.




The present invention is related to the use of the computer system


200


to facilitate communication between a first object and a second object. According to one embodiment, facilitating communication between the first object and the second object is performed by computer system


200


in response to the processor


201


executing sequences of instructions contained in the memory


213


. Such instructions may be read into the memory


213


from other computer-readable mediums such as data storage device


231


. Execution of the sequences of instructions contained in the memory


213


causes the processor to facilitate communication between the first object and the second object, as will be described hereafter. In alternative embodiments, hard-wired circuitry may be used in place of or in combination with software instructions to implement the present invention. Thus, the present invention is not limited to any specific combination of hardware circuitry and software.




CHANNEL NEGOTIATION





FIG. 3

illustrates how a channel of communication is negotiated according to an embodiment of the present invention. A session object


310


is an object originating from a client


130


-


133


. The session object


310


keeps track of the identity and the location in memory of the objects operating in its same run-time. The session object


310


operates as a mediator between a first object that wishes to communicate with a second object, but does not know the location in memory of the second object. The session object


310


includes a plurality of methods


311


-


314


that access a plurality of variables


320


. The variables


320


in the session object


310


represent object identifiers (IDs) of the objects operating the same run-time as the session object


310


. Each of the object IDs has a corresponding “handle” or a reference of the object. Information regarding the references and object IDs of the objects are stored on a table in the session object


310


. According to an embodiment of the present invention, the session object


310


also has an associated object ID that is stored in the table. Since the session object


310


knows a reference of the different objects operating in its same run-time, the session object


310


can make a direct method call on any of the objects. According to an embodiment of the present invention, the reference is a location in memory.




A first object wishing to communicate with a second object is represented as a sender object


330


. The sender object


330


originates from a client such as one of the clients


130


-


133


illustrated in FIG.


1


. The sender object


330


includes a plurality of methods


331


-


334


that access a plurality of variables


340


. The second object is represented as a receiver object


350


. The receiver object


350


originates from a client such as one of the clients


130


-


133


illustrated in FIG.


1


. The receiver object


350


includes a plurality of methods


351


-


353


that access a plurality of variables


360


. The sender object


330


is considered an untrusted object by the computer system where the receiver object


350


originated. Likewise, the receiver object


350


is considered an untrusted object by the computer system where the sender object


330


originated.




The sender object


330


is made aware of the existence of the receiver object


350


and given an object identifier (ID) of the receiver object


350


by the session object


310


, the receiver object


350


, or other source, but is not given the location in memory of the receiver object


350


. Without the exact location in memory of the receiver object


350


, the sender object


330


may not make a direct method call on the receiver object


350


.




In order to communicate with the receiver object


350


, the sender object


330


negotiates a channel of communication with the receiver object via the session object


310


. Both the sender object


330


and the receiver object


350


know the location in memory of the session object


310


and are able to make direct method calls on the session object


310


. The session object


310


includes a method, represented as “Get Channel”


311


, that communicates with the receiver object


350


on behalf of the sender object


330


and asks for a channel of communication. When called, the “Get Channel”


311


method is given the parameters that correspond to object ID of the sender object


330


requesting a channel of communication and the object ID of the receiver object


350


. The session object


310


retrieves the location in memory corresponding to the receiver object


350


and makes a direct method call to the receiver object


350


calling a method in the receiver object


350


that evaluates requests for channel represented as “Channel Request”


353


.




When called, the “Channel Request”


353


method is given the parameters that correspond to the object ID of the sender object


330


requesting the channel of communication. The receiver object


350


may reference information relating to the object ID of the sender object


330


. The information relating to the object ID is used to determine whether to give a channel of communication to the sender object


330


and if a channel is to be given what type of channel of communication to give the sender object


330


. If the information relating to the object ID of the sender object


330


indicates that the sender object


330


is a trustable object, the channel of communication may be an open channel that passes all requests from the sender object


330


to the receiver object


350


. If however, the information relating to the object ID of the sender object


330


indicates that the sender object


330


is not a trustable object, no channel of communication may be given or a channel which allows only a predefined set of requests and parameters to be passed to the receiver object


350


may be given. The receiver object


350


returns either a reference of a channel object granted to the sender object


330


or a response that no channel is granted to the session object. The session object


330


conveys this information to the sender object


330


on behalf of the receiver object


350


.




It should be appreciated that the session object


310


itself can be a sender object


330


wishing to negotiate a channel of communication with a receiver object


350


. When the session object


310


wishes to negotiate a channel of communication with the receiver object


350


, it makes a direct method call on the “Channel Request”


353


method on the receiver object


350


on its own behalf.




INTER-OBJECT MESSAGING





FIG. 4

illustrates how inter-object messaging is performed according to an embodiment of the present invention. When the sender object


330


receives the location in memory of a channel object


430


granted for communication with the receiver object


350


, the sender object


330


creates an intermediary object


410


. The intermediary object


410


includes a plurality of methods


421


-


423


that correspond to methods on the receiver object


350


that may be requested to be executed. According to one embodiment of the present invention, each of the methods on the intermediary object


410


has a name identical to a name of a method on the receiver object and the same parameters as the receiver objects. The methods on the intermediary object


410


, however, perform different functions than those of their corresponding methods on the receiver object


350


.




When the sender object


330


wishes to call a method in the receiver object


350


, the sender object


330


calls the name of that method on the intermediary object


410


. For example, the sender object


330


wishing to call a “Method 1”


352


on the receiver object


350


would instead call a “Method 1”


411


on the intermediary object


410


. When called, a “Method 1”


411


on the intermediary object


410


is given the parameters necessary for executing the corresponding “Method 1”


352


on the receiver object


350


, if necessary. The “Method 1”


411


on the intermediary object


410


makes a direct method call to the channel object


430


to direct the name of the method that was called and the parameters necessary for executing the method, if necessary, to the receiver object


350


. The location in memory of the channel object


430


is given to the intermediary object


410


by the sender object


330


. The method in the channel object


430


that is called by the intermediary object


410


is referenced as “Send”


431


.




The channel object


430


is created by the receiver object


350


to serve as a communication channel between the sender object


330


and the receiver object


350


. The channel object


430


includes a method, referenced as “Send”


431


, that sends the name of a method and related parameters to an message queue object


440


. According to one embodiment of the channel object


430


, the “Send” method


431


forwards every method name and parameters received from the intermediary object


410


to the message queue object


440


. According to an alternate embodiment of the channel object


430


, the “Send” method


431


filters the method names and parameters received from the intermediary object


410


and only forwards the names and parameters that correspond to a predefined set of method names and parameters to the message queue object


440


. It should be appreciated that the method names and parameters forwarded from the intermediary object


410


may also be formatted in an object form. The channel object


430


forwards the method names and parameters to the message queue object


440


by making a direct method call on the message queue object


440


and calling a method that stores the method names and parameters in a message queue. The location in memory of the message queue object


440


is given to the channel object


430


by the receiver object


350


. The method called is referenced as “Add”


441


.




The message queue object


440


is created by the receiver object


350


. The message queue object


440


operates to store a plurality of method names and parameters. The receiver object


350


includes a separate thread of execution that reads the method names and parameters stored in the message queue object


440


and executes the methods on the receiver object


350


. The receiver object


350


accesses the method names and parameters on the message queue object


440


by making a direct method call on the message queue object


440


. The receiver object


350


calls a method on the message queue object


440


, referenced as “Get”


442


. The “Get” method


442


sends the method names stored in the message queue object


440


to the receiver object


350


. The message queue object


440


allows the name of the methods stored to be executed by the receiver object


350


asynchronously.




According to an alternate embodiment of the present invention, a message queue method resides in the receiver object


350


. Instead of forwarding the method names and parameters to the message queue object


440


, the channel object


430


forwards the method names and parameters to the message queue method on the receiver object


350


by calling the message queue method. The name of the methods stored on the queue method are executed synchronously.





FIG. 5

is a flow chart illustrating a method for negotiating a channel of communication according to an embodiment of the present invention as illustrated in FIG.


3


. At step


501


, the session object is asked to retrieve a channel of communication. According to an embodiment of the present invention, a first object wishing to communicate with a second object asks the session object by making a direct method call on the session object. The direct method call contains a location in memory of the session object, the name of the method in the session object for getting the channel of communication, and object identifiers (IDs) of the first object requesting the channel of communication and of the second object.




At step


502


, a request is made to the second object for a channel of communication. According to an embodiment of the present invention, the session object makes the request by making a direct method call on the second object. The session object has a list of object identifiers of the objects operating in the run-time of the session and their corresponding locations in memory. With this information, the session object references the location in memory corresponding to the object ID of the second object. The direct method call made by the session object contains the location in memory of the second object, the name of the method in the second object for requesting a channel, and the object ID of the first object requesting the channel of communication.




At step


503


, a determination is made to the type of access to give the first object. According to an embodiment of the present invention, the second object references information relating to the object ID of the first object to determine whether the first object is a trustable object. Depending on how trustable the first object is, the second object may decide to grant an open channel of communication to the first object, a restricted channel of communication where the methods and parameters sent by the first object are filtered, or not grant a channel of communication.




At step


504


, a location in memory of the channel object or a response that no channel is to be granted is returned. According to an embodiment of the present invention, this information is returned to the session object. The session object proceeds to forward the information to the first object.





FIG. 6

is a flow chart illustrating a method for inter-object messaging a second object by a first object according to an embodiment of the present invention as illustrated in FIG.


4


. At step


601


, an intermediary object is called. According to an embodiment of the present invention, a direct method call is made by the first object on the intermediary object. The direct method call contains information regarding a location in memory of the intermediary object instead of a location in memory of the second object and a name of the method to be called on the second object.




At step


602


, the name of the method is delivered to a message queue object. According to an embodiment of the present invention, the name of the method is delivered from the intermediary object to the message queue object by first creating a message object that contains the name of the method to be called on the second object and then making a direct method call from the intermediary object to a channel object. Calling the method on the channel object sends the message object to the message queue object which causes the name of the method to be delivered on the message queue object.




At step


603


, the name of the method in the message queue is accessed by the second object. According to an embodiment of the present invention, the second object calls a method on the message queue object that causes the message object to be given to the second object. The second object then calls a method on the message object which causes the name of the method in the message object to be executed by the second object.




In the foregoing specification, the invention has been described with reference to specific embodiments thereof. It will, however, be evident that various modifications and changes may be made thereto without departing from the broader spirit and scope of the invention. The specification and drawings are, accordingly, to be regarded in an illustrative rather than a restrictive sense.



Claims
  • 1. A method for inter-object messaging comprising:creating an intermediary object by a first object subsequent to the first object receiving a location of a channel object, wherein the channel object is created by making a first direct method call from the first object to a session object to request a channel of communication with a second object; and making a second direct method call from the session object to the second object to request the channel of communication on behalf of the first object, wherein the second object grants a channel object to the first object, based on an object identifier (ID) of the first object, by returning the location in memory of the channel object to the first object; making a third direct method call on the intermediary object from the first object, the third direct method call including information regarding a location in memory of the intermediary object and a name of a method to be called on the second object; delivering the name of the method to be called on the second object from the intermediary object to a message queue object; accessing the name of the method to be called on the second object in the message queue object from the second object.
  • 2. The method of claim 1, wherein making the first direct method call comprises:identifying a location in memory of the session object; identifying a method in the session object; and identifying an object identifier (ID) corresponding to the second object.
  • 3. The method of claim 2, wherein making the second direct method call comprises:translating the object ID of the second object into a corresponding location in memory of the second object; and referencing the first object with the object ID of the first object.
  • 4. The method of claim 1, further comprising determining a type of channel to grant the first object prior to granting the channel object, wherein determining the type of channel to grant the first object comprises referencing information relating to the object ID of the first object.
  • 5. The method of claim 1, wherein delivering a name of the method to be called on the second object from the intermediary object to a message queue object comprises:creating a message object containing the name of the method to be called on the second object; and making a fourth direct method call from the intermediary object to the channel object that knows a location in memory of the message queue object to request the message object to be sent to the message queue object.
  • 6. The method of claim 1, wherein accessing the name of the method to be called on the second object in the message queue object from the second object comprises making a fifth direct method call from the second object to the message queue object to retrieve the name of the method on the message queue object.
  • 7. The method of claim 1, further comprising executing the name of the method in the message queue object.
  • 8. An article comprising: a storage medium having a plurality of machine accessible instructions, wherein when the instructions are executed by a processor, the instructions provide for creating an intermediary object by a first object subsequent to the first object receiving a location of a channel object, wherein instructions for creating the channel object includemaking a first direct method call from the first object to a session object to request a channel of communication with a second object; and making a second direct method call from the session object to the second object to request the channel of communication on behalf of the first object, wherein the second object grants a channel object to the first object, based on an object identifier (ID) of the first object, by returning the location in memory of the channel object to the first object; making a third direct method call on the intermediary object from the first object the third direct method call including information regarding a location in memory of the intermediary object and a name of a method to be called on the second object; delivering the name of the method to be called on the second object from the intermediary object to a message queue object; and accessing the name of the method to be called on the second object in the message queue object from the second object.
  • 9. The article of claim 8, wherein instructions for delivering a name of the method to be called on the second object from the intermediary object to a message queue object comprises instructions for:creating a message object containing the name of the method to be called on the second object; and making a fourth direct method call from the intermediary object to the channel object that knows a location in memory of the message queue object to request the message object to be sent to the message queue object.
  • 10. The article of claim 8, wherein instructions for accessing the name of the method to be called on the second object in the message queue object from the second object comprises instructions for making a fifth direct method call from the second object to the message queue object to retrieve the name of the method on the message queue object.
  • 11. The article of claim 8, further comprising instructions for executing the name of the method in the message queue object.
  • 12. The article of claim 8, wherein instructions for making the first direct method call comprises instructions for:identifying a location in memory of the session object; identifying a method in the session object; and identifying an object identifier (ID) corresponding to the second object.
  • 13. The article of claim 12, wherein instructions for making the second direct method call comprises instructions for:translating the object ID of the second object into a corresponding location in memory of the second object; and referencing the first object with the object ID of the first object.
  • 14. The article of claim 8, further comprising instructions for determining a type of channel to grant the first object prior to granting the channel object, wherein determining the type of channel to grant the first object comprises instructions for referencing information relating to the object ID of the first object.
Parent Case Info

The present application is a divisional application of application Ser. No. 08/828,885, filed Mar. 31, 1997, entitled Inter-Object Messaging, which is assigned to the same assignee of the present application.

US Referenced Citations (32)
Number Name Date Kind
4325120 Colley et al. Apr 1982 A
5136716 Harvey et al. Aug 1992 A
5173939 Abadi et al. Dec 1992 A
5235642 Wobber et al. Aug 1993 A
5315657 Abadi et al. May 1994 A
5329619 Page et al. Jul 1994 A
5379426 Foss et al. Jan 1995 A
5396630 Banda et al. Mar 1995 A
5414852 Kramer et al. May 1995 A
5450593 Howell et al. Sep 1995 A
5485617 Stutz et al. Jan 1996 A
5539909 Tanaka et al. Jul 1996 A
5551035 Arnold et al. Aug 1996 A
5619710 Travis et al. Apr 1997 A
5742848 Burgess Apr 1998 A
5751962 Fanshier et al. May 1998 A
5758159 Collet May 1998 A
5758186 Hamilton et al. May 1998 A
5761421 van Hoff et al. Jun 1998 A
5778222 Herrick et al. Jul 1998 A
5784560 Kingdon et al. Jul 1998 A
5822585 Noble et al. Oct 1998 A
5848234 Chernick et al. Dec 1998 A
5892946 Woster et al. Apr 1999 A
5941945 Aditham et al. Aug 1999 A
5999986 McCauley, III et al. Dec 1999 A
6049838 Miller et al. Apr 2000 A
6192405 Bunnell Feb 2001 B1
6192419 Aditham et al. Feb 2001 B1
6278532 Heimendinger et al. Aug 2001 B1
6282652 Scheifler Aug 2001 B1
6425017 Dievendorff et al. Jul 2002 B1
Non-Patent Literature Citations (19)
Entry
Bela Ban Dept. of Computer Science. “JavaGroups—Group Communication Patterns in Java”. Jul. 31, 1998, p. 1-16.*
Buschmann et al. “Pattern-Oriented Software Architecture, A System of Patterns”. Aug. 1996, p. 323-337.*
Chung, Goopeel, et al.; Generic and Composable Latecomer Accommodation Service for Centralized Shared Systems; Seventh International Conference on Engineering for Human-Computer Interaction, EHCI '98; http://www.zmms.tuberlin.de/˜sandro/conferences/embed.en.phtml/ehci98; 16 pgs, 3 pgs introduction.
Edwards, W. Keith; Session Management for Collaborative Applications; the Association of Computing Machinery; CSCW 94-10/94; Chapel Hill, NC, USA; © 1994 ACM 0-89791-689—1/94/0010; pp. 323-330.
Girdley, Michael, et al.; Web Programming with JAVA™; Part 1, Chapter 1 An Overview Of Java; Jun. 01, 2001; cover page, 2 pages about Security Manager.
Mates, Nathan, et al.; The Web meets MOOs, IRC and the MBone; Project Y Overview; California Institute of Technology; http://www.cs.caltech.edu/˜schooler/overview; 13 pgs.
Schuckmann, Christian, et al.; Designing object-oriented synchronous groupware with COAST; http://citeseer.nj.nec.com/schuckmann96designing; pp. 1-10.
CORBA Security Draft 0.2 of merged submission; Sep. 1995; OMG Document No. 95-9-1; cover page, pp. 2-120.
JAVA Security; Chapter 4: The Security Manager Class; Using the Security Manager (Java Security) http://www.google.com/search?q=cac...2+and+%22socket+factories%22&hl=en; Aug. 27, 2001; pp. 1-19.
Yialelis, Nicholas, et al., “A Security Framework Supporting Domain Based Access Control in Distributed Systems,” Imperial College Research Report No. DoC 95/14, Sep. 15, 1995, 18 pages, Department of Computing, Imperial College, London, UK.
Yialelis, Nicholas, et al., “An Authentication Service Supporting Domain Based Access Control Policies,” Imperial College Research Report No. DoC 95/13, Sep. 15, 1995, 12 pages, Department of Computing, Imperial College, London, UK.
Lupu, Emil C., et al., “A Policy Based Role Framework For Access Control,” First ACM/NIST Role Based Access Control Workshop, Gaithersburg, USA, Dec. 1995, 9 pages, Department of Computing, Imperial College, London, UK.
Introduction to KeySAFE—Trusted Computer Base Components, Agorics, Inc., Los Altos, CA;7 pages; http://www.cis.upenn.edu/˜KeyKOS/agorics/KeyKos/keysafe/Keysafe.html and http://www.cis.upenn.edu/˜KeyKOS/agorics/KeyKos/keysafe/Trusted.html.
Van Doorn, Leendert, et al., “Secure Network Objects,” Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, and Digital Systems Research Center, Palo Alto, California USA; 11 pages.
Dean, Drew, et al., “Java Security: From HotJava to Netscape and Beyond,” Department of Computer Science, Princeton University, Princeton, New Jersey; 11 pages.
Lampson, Butler W., “Protection” Xerox Corporation, Palo Alto, California; 10 pages.
Shoffner, Michael, et al., “Java and Web-Executable Object Security—How safe is safe?” Nov. 1996; Java and Web Security, Dr. Dobb's Software Tools for the Professional Programmer; 8 pages; http://www.ddj.com/print/documentID=13332.
IBM Corp. 1994, “MQSeries Distributed Queue Management Guide.”
IBM Corp. 1993 “MQSeries Application Programming Guide.”