Computer systems are increasingly being configured to accept inputs from natural user interfaces (NUIs) that allow users to interact with a computer system via natural, intuitive motions. For example, a computing system may be configured to accept user inputs in the form of user motions detected by a camera, such as a depth-sensing camera. Images from the camera are analyzed to locate people in the images, and to track motions of those people over time. Filters may then be used to determine whether a detected motion is a recognized user input.
Various embodiments are disclosed herein that relate to interacting with a natural user interface via feedback provided by an avatar presented on a display. For example, one disclosed embodiment provides a method of presenting a user interface, wherein the method comprises receiving depth data from a depth-sensing camera, locating a person in the depth data, and mapping a physical space in front of the person to a screen space of a display device. The method further comprises forming an image of an avatar representing the person, outputting to the display device an image of a user interface comprising an interactive user interface control, and outputting to the display device the image of the avatar such that the avatar appears to face the user interface control. The method further comprises detecting a motion of the person via the depth data, forming an animated representation of the avatar interacting with the user interface control based upon the motion of the person, and outputting to the display the animated representation of the avatar interacting with the user interface control.
This Summary is provided to introduce a selection of concepts in a simplified form that are further described below in the Detailed Description. This Summary is not intended to identify key features or essential features of the claimed subject matter, nor is it intended to be used to limit the scope of the claimed subject matter. Furthermore, the claimed subject matter is not limited to implementations that solve any or all disadvantages noted in any part of this disclosure.
One difficulty that may be encountered when using a depth-sensing camera to detect gesture-based inputs for a computing system may involve interactions with a user interface presented on a display. A user interface may comprise various controls selectable by a user to cause the execution of actions by the computing system. In the case of a traditional graphical user interface, a person may select a user interface control by moving a cursor over the control via a mouse or other cursor control device, by using a touch-screen input, or in other such manners that involve no spatial ambiguity between the user interface control and the user input mechanism (cursor, finger, etc.).
However, when using a depth-sensing camera to detect gesture-based inputs, some spatial ambiguity may exist when mapping a motion made by a person to a movement of a cursor on a user interface. For example, a length of a person's arms, a person's height, a person's orientation, a distance of the person from the camera, etc. all may affect the perception of a person's motion as viewed by the camera. Therefore, it may be difficult to map the motion of the person's limb to a movement of the cursor relative to the user interface control in a manner corresponding to the intent of the person.
One potential solution to overcoming such difficulties in mapping player motion to cursor motion may be to calibrate user motion to cursor motion. For example, a computing device may ask a user to make a specified motion (e.g. move your arm from a bottom left of the screen to a top right of the screen), and then calibrate the detected range of motion of the person's arm to the screen of the display device. As a person changes location and/or orientation to the screen, the person's motion may be tracked to update the mapping of the motion perceived by the camera to the screen space.
However, such calibration steps may be time-consuming, and also may be disruptive in a dynamic environment where users may be entering and leaving a computing device during a use session (e.g. a video game or other interactive entertainment experience) over time. Therefore, embodiments are disclosed herein that relate to the presentation of a user interface wherein an avatar representing a person currently using the computing system is displayed along with a user interface. Motions of the person are represented by motions of the avatar, such that the motions of the avatar illustrate how the motions of the user are perceived by the computing system. The person may observe how the avatar moves in response to user motions, and therefore may adjust his or her motions to accomplish desired interactions with the user interface. In this manner, calibration may be avoided, as a person may be trained to adjust for any differences between an intended user interface interaction and an actual user interface interaction by observing the motion of the avatar. This may help to reinforce effective user interface interaction methods. Additionally, in some embodiments configured for use by multiple persons at one time, an avatar for each user may be presented, wherein the avatar for the person or persons currently in control of the user interface may be visually distinguished from the avatars for persons not in control of the user interface. Each of these features are described in more detail below.
As described in more detail below, the input device 108 may comprise various sensors configured to provide input data to the computing device 104. Examples of sensors that may be included in the input device 106 include, but are not limited to, a depth-sensing camera, a video camera, and/or a directional audio input device such as a directional microphone array. In embodiments that comprise a depth-sensing camera, the computing device 102 may be configured to locate persons in image data acquired from a depth-sensing camera tracking, and to track motions of identified persons to identify recognized gestures. Gesture inputs, speech inputs, and/or combinations thereof may be used to interact with applications running on the computing device 102. For example, where computing device 102 is a video game console executing an interactive entertainment application, users may control motions of characters displayed on the display 106 via gestures detected by a depth sensor on input device 106.
Further, users also may interact with interactive controls on a user interface displayed on the display 106 via gestures.
Therefore, to assist users in interacting with user interface elements, and also to help users learn how user interface interaction gestures are interpreted by the computing device 104, user interface comprises an avatar 120 displayed as facing the user interface controls. Motion of the avatar 120 tracks motion of a person currently using the system (“user”) 122, such that the user may move a limb to cause motion of a limb of the avatar relative to the user interface controls. This provides feedback to the user 122 regarding how the avatar's limb motions respond to the user's limb motions, and therefore may help the user to interact with the user interface, as the user can adjust movements to achieve a desired avatar movement, as described in more detail below. In the depicted embodiment, the avatar is displayed as facing the person whom the avatar represents. However, in other embodiments, the avatar may face in any other suitable direction.
The limb of the avatar 122 further may be configured to change configuration when brought into proximity with a user interface element, such as user interface element 110, to indicate to the user 120 that interaction with the user interface element may be performed. For example, a hand of the avatar 120 may change color, position, etc. when close enough to a user interface element to interact with the user interface element. In one more specific embodiment, a hand of the avatar 120 may close over a user interface element to indicate that interaction with the user interface element is enabled.
The avatar 122 may have any suitable appearance. For example, in some embodiments, the avatar 122 may be a literal image of the user as detected via the input device 108, while in other embodiments, the avatar 122 may have an artistic, non-literal appearance. Where the avatar 122 has an artistic, non-literal appearance, the avatar's appearance may be derived from the image of the user as detected via the input device 108, may be based upon an avatar stored in a profile associated with the user, or may be determined in any other manner.
Prior to discussing the presentation of such user interfaces in more detail, an example embodiment of a computing system environment 200 is described with reference to
Computing device 104 is illustrated as comprising a logic subsystem 210 and a data-holding subsystem 212. Logic subsystem 210 may include one or more physical devices configured to execute one or more instructions. For example, the logic subsystem may be configured to execute one or more instructions that are part of one or more programs, routines, objects, components, data structures, or other logical constructs. Such instructions may be implemented to perform a task, implement a data type, transform the state of one or more devices, or otherwise arrive at a desired result. The logic subsystem may include one or more processors that are configured to execute software instructions. Additionally or alternatively, the logic subsystem may include one or more hardware or firmware logic machines configured to execute hardware or firmware instructions. The logic subsystem may optionally include individual components that are distributed throughout two or more devices, which may be remotely located in some embodiments.
Data-holding subsystem 212 may include one or more physical devices, which may be non-transitory, and which are configured to hold data and/or instructions executable by the logic subsystem to implement the herein described methods and processes. When such methods and processes are implemented, the state of data-holding subsystem 212 may be transformed (e.g., to hold different data). Data-holding subsystem 212 may include removable media and/or built-in devices. Data-holding subsystem 212 may include optical memory devices, semiconductor memory devices, and/or magnetic memory devices, among others. Data-holding subsystem 212 may include devices with one or more of the following characteristics: volatile, nonvolatile, dynamic, static, read/write, read-only, random access, sequential access, location addressable, file addressable, and content addressable. In some embodiments, logic subsystem 210 and data-holding subsystem 212 may be integrated into one or more common devices, such as an application specific integrated circuit or a system on a chip.
Display 106 may be used to present a visual representation of data held by data-holding subsystem 212. As the herein described methods and processes change the data held by the data-holding subsystem 212, and thus transform the state of the data-holding subsystem 212, the state of the display 204 may likewise be transformed to visually represent changes in the underlying data. The display 204 may include one or more display devices utilizing virtually any type of technology. Such display devices may be combined with logic subsystem 210 and/or data-holding subsystem 212 in a shared enclosure, or, as depicted in
The depicted input device 108 comprises a depth sensor 220, such as a depth-sensing camera, an image sensor 222, such as a video camera, and a directional microphone array 224. Inputs received from the depth sensor 220 allow the computing device 104 to locate any persons in the field of view of the depth sensor 220, and also to track the motions of any such persons over time. The image sensor 222 is configured to capture visible images within a same field of view, or an overlapping field of view, as the depth sensor 220, and the directional microphone array 224 allows a direction from which a speech input is received to be determined, and therefore may be used in combination with depth data and/or video data to determine a user from which a speech input is received.
It will be appreciated that the particular sensors shown in
Referring briefly back to
The computing system 102 may determine which user is in control of user interface 300 in any suitable manner. For example, the computing system 102 apply various heuristics to the depth data, image data, speech data and/or other input data received from an input device or devices to determine an intent of a user to assume control of the user interface 300. As one more specific example, the computing system 102 may interpret the gesture of a user extending a limb toward the input device 108 as manifesting an intent to control the user interface 300. This is depicted is
The mapping of the physical space of the person to the display screen space allows movements of a person's limb or limbs to be translated into movements of corresponding limbs of an avatar on the user interface. The physical space of the person may be mapped in any suitable manner. For example, a length of the person's limb may first be estimated from the depth data via skeletal tracking, as indicted at 510. This may involve the determination of the height, orientation, position, distance from the depth-sensing camera, angle of person relative to depth-sensing camera, location of head and shoulders, and other such quantities regarding the person. Then, at 512, an extent of a potential range of motion of the person's limb from the perspective of the depth-sensing camera may be estimated based upon the estimated length of the person's limb. Then the potential range of motion of the person's limb may be mapped to the display screen. It will be understood that the above-described method for mapping a person's physical space to a display space is presented for the purpose of example, and is not intended to be limiting in any manner. It will further be understood that the term “mapping to a display screen” and the like refer to mapping the physical space in front of the user's body to an array of pixels of the resolution of the display device.
Continuing with
Where a plurality of persons are detected in the depth data, method 500 may comprise, at 516, determining which person is manifesting an intent to control the user interface. Such an intent may be determined in any suitable manner, including but not limited to via analysis of a user's limb gestures (e.g. extending a limb toward the screen), a user's distance from the screen (e.g. which person is closest to the screen), analysis of voice commands (e.g. detecting a speech command requesting control of the user interface, using directional audio information to determine the person from which the command was received), and/or using any other suitable information. Then, at 518, method 500 may comprise forming an image comprising a plurality of avatars, wherein the avatar that represents the person in control of the user interface is visually distinguished from avatars representing persons not in control of the user interface. The avatar representing the person in control of the user interface may be visually distinguished from the other avatars in any suitable manner, including but not limited to size, posture, color, transparency, blur, location on display screen relative to user interface and other avatars, etc.
Continuing with
Next, method 500 comprises, at 526, detecting a motion of the person in control of the user interface. The motion may be a motion of the limb of the person, as indicated at 528, or any other suitable motion. The motion may be determined by skeletal tracking techniques based upon the depth data received from the depth-sensing camera, or in any other suitable manner. Then, at 530, method 500 comprises forming an animated representation of the avatar interacting with the user interface control based upon the motion of the person, and, at 532, outputting an animated representation of the avatar interacting with the user interface control. The term “interacting with” may signify that the avatar moves relative to the user interface control (e.g. either closer to or farther from the user interface control), that the avatar enters into or exits from an interaction-enabled state wherein the avatar can manipulate the user interface control, or any other suitable motion or action on the user interface. As a more specific example, when a hand of the avatar touches a user interface control, the hand may change in configuration (e.g. grip the user interface control, or extend one or more fingers to press a user interface control configured as a button), in color, brightness, size, or in any other suitable manner.
Likewise, the animated representation of the avatar may be produced in any suitable manner. For example, inverse kinematics may be utilized to determine the configuration of the avatar's limb based upon a mapping of a location of the avatar's hand based upon the location of the user's hand as determined from skeletal tracking.
In some embodiments, as indicated at 534, a motion of the avatar's limb may be biased toward a user interface element as it approaches the user interface element. This may facilitate use of the user interface by guiding the motion of the avatar toward interactive elements. An example of this is illustrated schematically in
Returning to
The above-described embodiments may help to facilitate the use of a user interface controlled via gestures detected by a depth-sensing camera, and also may help to reinforce user gesture behaviors that result in successful user interface navigation. It is to be understood that the configurations and/or approaches described herein are presented for the purpose of example, and that these specific embodiments are not to be considered in a limiting sense, because numerous variations are possible. The specific routines or methods described herein may represent one or more of any number of processing strategies. As such, various acts illustrated may be performed in the sequence illustrated, in other sequences, in parallel, or in some cases omitted. Likewise, the order of the above-described processes may be changed.
The subject matter of the present disclosure includes all novel and nonobvious combinations and subcombinations of the various processes, systems and configurations, and other features, functions, acts, and/or properties disclosed herein, as well as any and all equivalents thereof.
This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/814,237, filed on Jun. 11, 2010, and titled “INTERACTING WITH USER INTERFACE VIA AVATAR,” the entire disclosure of which is incorporated by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4627620 | Yang | Dec 1986 | A |
4630910 | Ross et al. | Dec 1986 | A |
4645458 | Williams | Feb 1987 | A |
4695953 | Blair et al. | Sep 1987 | A |
4702475 | Elstein et al. | Oct 1987 | A |
4711543 | Blair et al. | Dec 1987 | A |
4751642 | Silva et al. | Jun 1988 | A |
4796997 | Svetkoff et al. | Jan 1989 | A |
4809065 | Harris et al. | Feb 1989 | A |
4817950 | Goo | Apr 1989 | A |
4843568 | Krueger et al. | Jun 1989 | A |
4893183 | Nayar | Jan 1990 | A |
4901362 | Terzian | Feb 1990 | A |
4925189 | Braeunig | May 1990 | A |
5101444 | Wilson et al. | Mar 1992 | A |
5148154 | MacKay et al. | Sep 1992 | A |
5184295 | Mann | Feb 1993 | A |
5229754 | Aoki et al. | Jul 1993 | A |
5229756 | Kosugi et al. | Jul 1993 | A |
5239463 | Blair et al. | Aug 1993 | A |
5239464 | Blair et al. | Aug 1993 | A |
5288078 | Capper et al. | Feb 1994 | A |
5295491 | Gevins | Mar 1994 | A |
5320538 | Baum | Jun 1994 | A |
5347306 | Nitta | Sep 1994 | A |
5385519 | Hsu et al. | Jan 1995 | A |
5405152 | Katanics et al. | Apr 1995 | A |
5417210 | Funda et al. | May 1995 | A |
5423554 | Davis | Jun 1995 | A |
5454043 | Freeman | Sep 1995 | A |
5469740 | French et al. | Nov 1995 | A |
5491743 | Shiio et al. | Feb 1996 | A |
5495576 | Ritchey | Feb 1996 | A |
5516105 | Eisenbrey et al. | May 1996 | A |
5524637 | Erickson | Jun 1996 | A |
5534917 | MacDougall | Jul 1996 | A |
5563988 | Maes et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5577981 | Jarvik | Nov 1996 | A |
5580249 | Jacobsen et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5594469 | Freeman et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
5597309 | Riess | Jan 1997 | A |
5616078 | Oh | Apr 1997 | A |
5617312 | Iura et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5638300 | Johnson | Jun 1997 | A |
5641288 | Zaenglein | Jun 1997 | A |
5682196 | Freeman | Oct 1997 | A |
5682229 | Wangler | Oct 1997 | A |
5690582 | Ulrich et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
5703367 | Hashimoto et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5704837 | Iwasaki et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
5715834 | Bergamasco et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
5875108 | Hoffberg et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5877803 | Wee et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5913727 | Ahdoot | Jun 1999 | A |
5933125 | Fernie | Aug 1999 | A |
5980256 | Carmein | Nov 1999 | A |
5989157 | Walton | Nov 1999 | A |
5995649 | Marugame | Nov 1999 | A |
6005548 | Latypov et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6009210 | Kang | Dec 1999 | A |
6054991 | Crane et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6066075 | Poulton | May 2000 | A |
6072494 | Nguyen | Jun 2000 | A |
6073489 | French et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6077201 | Cheng et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6098458 | French et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6100896 | Strohecker et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6101289 | Kellner | Aug 2000 | A |
6128003 | Smith et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6130677 | Kunz | Oct 2000 | A |
6141463 | Covell et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6147678 | Kumar et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6152856 | Studor et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6159100 | Smith | Dec 2000 | A |
6173066 | Peurach et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6181343 | Lyons | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6188777 | Darrell et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6215890 | Matsuo et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6215898 | Woodfill et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6226396 | Marugame | May 2001 | B1 |
6229913 | Nayar et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6256033 | Nguyen | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6256400 | Takata et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6283860 | Lyons et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6289112 | Jain et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6299308 | Voronka et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6308565 | French et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6316934 | Amorai-Moriya et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6363160 | Bradski et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6384819 | Hunter | May 2002 | B1 |
6411744 | Edwards | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6430997 | French et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6476834 | Doval et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6496598 | Harman | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6503195 | Keller et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6539931 | Trajkovic et al. | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6570555 | Prevost et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6633294 | Rosenthal et al. | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6640202 | Dietz et al. | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6661918 | Gordon et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6681031 | Cohen et al. | Jan 2004 | B2 |
6697072 | Russell et al. | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6714665 | Hanna et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6731799 | Sun et al. | May 2004 | B1 |
6738066 | Nguyen | May 2004 | B1 |
6765726 | French et al. | Jul 2004 | B2 |
6788809 | Grzeszczuk et al. | Sep 2004 | B1 |
6801637 | Voronka et al. | Oct 2004 | B2 |
6873723 | Aucsmith et al. | Mar 2005 | B1 |
6876496 | French et al. | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6894678 | Rosenberg et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
6937742 | Roberts et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6950534 | Cohen et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
7003134 | Covell et al. | Feb 2006 | B1 |
7036094 | Cohen et al. | Apr 2006 | B1 |
7038855 | French et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7039676 | Day et al. | May 2006 | B1 |
7042440 | Pryor et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7050606 | Paul et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7058204 | Hildreth et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7060957 | Lange et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7113918 | Ahmad et al. | Sep 2006 | B1 |
7121946 | Paul et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7170492 | Bell | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7184048 | Hunter | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7202898 | Braun et al. | Apr 2007 | B1 |
7222078 | Abelow | May 2007 | B2 |
7227526 | Hildreth et al. | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7259747 | Bell | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7308112 | Fujimura et al. | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7317836 | Fujimura et al. | Jan 2008 | B2 |
7348963 | Bell | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7359121 | French et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7367887 | Watabe et al. | May 2008 | B2 |
7379563 | Shamaie | May 2008 | B2 |
7379566 | Hildreth | May 2008 | B2 |
7389591 | Jaiswal et al. | Jun 2008 | B2 |
7412077 | Li et al. | Aug 2008 | B2 |
7421093 | Hildreth et al. | Sep 2008 | B2 |
7430312 | Gu | Sep 2008 | B2 |
7436496 | Kawahito | Oct 2008 | B2 |
7450736 | Yang et al. | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7452275 | Kuraishi | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7460690 | Cohen et al. | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7489812 | Fox et al. | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7536032 | Bell | May 2009 | B2 |
7555142 | Hildreth et al. | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7560701 | Oggier et al. | Jul 2009 | B2 |
7570805 | Gu | Aug 2009 | B2 |
7574020 | Shamaie | Aug 2009 | B2 |
7576727 | Bell | Aug 2009 | B2 |
7590262 | Fujimura et al. | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7593552 | Higaki et al. | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7598942 | Underkoffler et al. | Oct 2009 | B2 |
7607509 | Schmiz et al. | Oct 2009 | B2 |
7620202 | Fujimura et al. | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7668340 | Cohen et al. | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7680298 | Roberts et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7683954 | Ichikawa et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7684592 | Paul et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7701439 | Hillis et al. | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7702130 | Im et al. | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7704135 | Harrison, Jr. | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7710391 | Bell et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
7729530 | Antonov et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7746345 | Hunter | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7760182 | Ahmad et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7809167 | Bell | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7834846 | Bell | Nov 2010 | B1 |
7852262 | Namineni et al. | Dec 2010 | B2 |
RE42256 | Edwards | Mar 2011 | E |
7898522 | Hildreth et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
8035612 | Bell et al. | Oct 2011 | B2 |
8035614 | Bell et al. | Oct 2011 | B2 |
8035624 | Bell et al. | Oct 2011 | B2 |
8072470 | Marks | Dec 2011 | B2 |
8253746 | Geisner et al. | Aug 2012 | B2 |
20040193413 | Wilson et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20080026838 | Dunstan et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20090027337 | Hildreth | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090077504 | Bell et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090251460 | Dunnigan | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20100306685 | Giaimo, III et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
201254344 | Jun 2010 | CN |
0583061 | Feb 1994 | EP |
08044490 | Feb 1996 | JP |
9310708 | Jun 1993 | WO |
9717598 | May 1997 | WO |
9944698 | Sep 1999 | WO |
Entry |
---|
State Intellectual Property Office of the People's Republic of China, Second Office Action Issued in Chinese Patent Application No. 201110168325.7, Mar. 13, 2014, 9 Pages. |
State Intellectual Property Office of the People's Republic of China, Third Office Action Issued in Chinese Patent Application No. 201110168325.7, Sep. 22, 2014, 11 Pages. |
Kanade et al., “A Stereo Machine for Video-rate Dense Depth Mapping and Its New Applications”, IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 1996, pp. 196-202. |
Miyagawa et al., “CCD-Based Range Finding Sensor”, IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices, vol. 44 No. 10, Oct. 1997, pp. 1648-1652. |
Rosenhahn et al., “Automatic Human Model Generation”, 2005, pp. 41-48, University of Auckland (CITR), New Zealand. |
Aggarwal et al., “Human Motion Analysis: A Review”, IEEE Nonrigid and Articulated Motion Workshop, 1997, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX. |
Shao et al., “An Open System Architecture for a Multimedia and Multimodal User Interface”, Aug. 24, 1998, Japanese Society for Rehabilitation of Persons with Disabilities (JSRPD), Japan. |
Kohler, “Special Topics of Gesture Recognition Applied in Intelligent Home Environments”, In Proceedings of the Gesture Workshop, 1998, pp. 285-296, Germany. |
Kohler, “Vision Based Remote Control in Intelligent Home Environments”, University of Erlangen-Nuremberg/Germany, 1996, pp. 147-154, Germany. |
Kohler, “Technical Details and Ergonomical Aspects of Gesture Recognition applied in Intelligent Home Environments”, 1997, Germany. |
Hasegawa et al., “Human-Scale Haptic Interaction with a Reactive Virtual Human in a Real-Time Physics Simulator”, Jul. 2006, vol. 4, No. 3, Article 6C, ACM Computers in Entertainment, New York, NY. |
Qian et al., “A Gesture-Driven Multimodal Interactive Dance System”, Jun. 2004, pp. 1579-1582, IEEE International Conference on Multimedia and Expo (ICME), Taipei, Taiwan. |
Zhao, “Dressed Human Modeling, Detection, and Parts Localization”, 2001, The Robotics Institute, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA. |
He, “Generation of Human Body Models”, Apr. 2005, University of Auckland, New Zealand. |
Isard et al., “Condensation—Conditional Density Propagation for Visual Tracking”, 1998, pp. 5-28, International Journal of Computer Vision 29(1), Netherlands. |
Livingston, “Vision-based Tracking with Dynamic Structured Light for Video See-through Augmented Reality”, 1998, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA. |
Wren et al., “Pfinder: Real-Time Tracking of the Human Body”, MIT Media Laboratory Perceptual Computing Section Technical Report No. 353, Jul. 1997, vol. 19, No. 7, pp. 780-785, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, Caimbridge, MA. |
Breen et al., “Interactive Occlusion and Collusion of Real and Virtual Objects in Augmented Reality”, Technical Report ECRC-95-02, 1995, European Computer-Industry Research Center GmbH, Munich, Germany. |
Freeman et al., “Television Control by Hand Gestures”, Dec. 1994, Mitsubishi Electric Research Laboratories, TR94-24, Caimbridge, MA. |
Hongo et al., “Focus of Attention for Face and Hand Gesture Recognition Using Multiple Cameras”, Mar. 2000, pp. 156-161, 4th IEEE International Conference on Automatic Face and Gesture Recognition, Grenoble, France. |
Pavlovic et al., “Visual Interpretation of Hand Gestures for Human-Computer Interaction: a Review”, Jul. 1997, pp. 677-695, vol. 19, No. 7, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence. |
Azarbayejani et al., “Visually Controlled Graphics”, Jun. 1993, vol. 15, No. 6, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence. |
Granieri et al., “Simulating Humans in VR”, The British Computer Society, Oct. 1994, Academic Press. |
Brogan et al., “Dynamically Simulated Characters in Virtual Environments”, Sep./Oct. 1998, pp. 2-13, vol. 18, Issue 5, IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications. |
Fisher et al., “Virtual Environment Display System”, ACM Workshop on Interactive 3D Graphics, Oct. 1986, Chapel Hill, NC. |
“Virtual High Anxiety”, Tech Update, Aug. 1995, pp. 22. |
Sheridan et al., “Virtual Reality Check”, Technology Review, Oct. 1993, pp. 22-28, vol. 96, No. 7. |
Stevens, “Flights into Virtual Reality Treating Real World Disorders”, The Washington Post, Mar. 27, 1995, Science Psychology, 2 pages. |
“Simulation and Training”, 1994, Division Incorporated. |
State Intellectual Property Office of China, Office Action of Chinese Patent Application No. 201110168325.7, Jul. 1, 2013, 11 pages. |
Yonemoto, et al., “Avatar Motion Control by user Body Postures”, Retrieved at << http://delivery.acm.org/10.1145/960000/957088/p347-yonemoto.pdf?key1=957088&key2=9632941721&coll=GUIDe&dl=GUIDE&CFID=84635405&CFTOKEN=83791617 >>, Proceedings of the 11th Annual ACM International Conference on Multimedia, Nov. 2-8, 2003, pp. 347-350. |
Li, et al., “Improving the Experience of Controlling Avatars in Camera-based Games Using Physical Input”, Retrieved at << http://moraveji.org/images/projects/avatar—disconnection.pdf >>, Proceedings of the 14th Annual ACM International Conference on Multimedia, Oct. 23-27, 2006, 4 pages. |
Boulic, et al., “Integration of Motion Control Techniques for Virtual Human and Avatar Real-time Animation”, Retrieved at << http://vrlab.epfl.ch/˜thalmann/papers.dir/agentlib.pdf >>, Proceedings of the ACM International Symposium on Virtual Reality Software and Technology, Sep. 1997, 12 pages. |
Lee, et al., “The Control of Avatar Motion Using Hand Gesture”, Retrieved at << http://yu.ac.kr/˜cvpr/paper/1998/VRST98—CS.pdf >>, Virtual Reality Software and Technology, Proceedings of the ACM symposium on Virtual reality software and technology, Nov. 2-5, 1998, pp. 7. |
Ogi, et al., “High Presence Collaboration Using Plug-in Video Avatar”, Retrieved at <<http://lab.sdm.keio.ac.jp/ogi/papers/IDETC2009paper.pdf>> , Proceedings of the ASME 2009 International Design Engineering Technical Conferences & Computers and Information in Engineering Conference, Aug. 30-Sep. 2, 2009, 6 pages. |
Oshita, Masaki, “Motion-Capture-Based Avatar Control Framework in Third-person View Virtual Environments”, Retrieved at << http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.95.3986&rep=rep1&type=pdf >>, Proceedings of the 2006 ACM SIGCHI International Conference on Advances in Computer Entertainment Technology, Jun. 14-16, 2006, 9 pages. |
The Patent Office of the State Intellectual Property Office of China, Final Office Action issued in China Patent Application No. 201110168325.7, Apr. 3, 2015, China, 8 pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20140267311 A1 | Sep 2014 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 12814237 | Jun 2010 | US |
Child | 14290749 | US |