This patent document is directed generally to video coding technologies.
Motion compensation is a technique in video processing to predict a frame in a video, given the previous and/or future frames by accounting for motion of the camera and/or objects in the video. Motion compensation can be used in the encoding and decoding of video data for video compression.
Devices, systems and methods related to intra-block copy for motion compensation are described.
In one representative aspect, the disclosed technology may be used to provide a method for video encoding using intra-block copy. This method includes determining whether a current block of the current picture is to be encoded using a motion compensation algorithm, and encoding, based on the determining, the current block by selectively applying an intra-block copy to the current block.
In another representative aspect, the disclosed technology may be used to provide another method for video encoding using intra-block copy. This method includes determining whether a current block of the current picture is to be encoded using an intra-block copy, and encoding, based on the determining, the current block by selectively applying a motion compensation algorithm to the current block.
In yet another representative aspect, the disclosed technology may be used to provide a method for video decoding using intra-block copy. This method includes determining whether a current block of the current picture is to be decoded using a motion compensation algorithm, and decoding, based on the determining, the current block by selectively applying an intra-block copy to the current block.
In yet another representative aspect, the disclosed technology may be used to provide another method for video decoding using intra-block copy. This method includes determining whether a current block of the current picture is to be decoded using an intra-block copy, and decoding, based on the determining, the current block by selectively applying a motion compensation algorithm to the current block.
In yet another representative aspect, a method of decoding visual information is disclosed. The method includes determining, from a coded representation, that a block being decoded representing a portion of the visual information is coded using an alternative temporal motion vector prediction (ATMVP) coding technique; determining that a spatially neighboring block of the block being decoded is coded using an intra-block copy (IBC) coding technique; deciding that the spatially neighboring block cannot provide a motion vector to derive a temporal vector for the block being decoded; and decoding the coded representation by using an ATMVP decoding technique corresponding to the ATMVP coding technique and by excluding use of the spatially neighboring block to provide the motion vector to derive the temporal vector for the block being decoded.
In yet another representative aspect, another method of decoding visual information is disclosed. The method includes determining, from a coded representation, that a block being decoded representing a portion of the visual information is coded using an alternative temporal motion vector prediction (ATMVP) coding technique; determining that a collocated block in a reference picture is coded using an intra-block copy (IBC) coding technique; deciding that the collocated block in the reference picture cannot be used to derive a motion vector for a sub-block of the block being decoded; and decoding the coded representation by using an ATMVP decoding technique corresponding to the ATMVP coding technique and by excluding use of the collocated block in the reference picture to provide a temporal motion vector candidate for the sub-block of the block being decoded.
In yet another representative aspect, another method of visual information processing is disclosed. The method includes encoding the visual information into a plurality of encoded pictures and a plurality of indicators signaling one or more encoding techniques applied, the plurality of indicators comprising an intra-block copy (IBC) technique indicator and an ATMVP technique indicator, wherein a first block of a first picture associated with the visual information is encoded using the IBC technique and a second block of a second picture associated with the visual information is encoded using the ATMVP technique, wherein the IBC technique uses a different block of the first picture to encode the first block of the first picture and the ATMVP technique uses a third picture associated with the visual information to encode the second picture.
In yet another representative aspect, the above-described method is embodied in the form of processor-executable code and stored in a computer-readable program medium.
In yet another representative aspect, a device that is configured or operable to perform the above-described method is disclosed. The device may include a processor that is programmed to implement this method.
In yet another representative aspect, a video decoder apparatus may implement a method as described herein.
The above and other aspects and features of the disclosed technology are described in greater detail in the drawings, the description and the claims.
Section headings are used in the present document for the ease of understanding and do not limit scope of the technologies and embodiments discussed in each section to just that section.
Due to the increasing demand of higher resolution visual information, such as video, images, three-dimensional scenes, etc., video coding methods and techniques are ubiquitous in modern technology. The techniques described in this application can apply to various visual information including video, images, three-dimensional scenes, etc. A picture of the visual information can be a frame in a video, a portion of an image, an object in a three-dimensional scene, a portion of the three-dimensional scene, etc. A block can be portion of the picture of the visual information such as a coding unit (CU), a largest coding unit (LCU), a sample, a prediction unit (PU) etc. as described in this application. A sub-block of the visual information can be a PU such as a sub-CU, a sample, etc. The PU can be a pixel, a voxel, or a smallest quantum of resolution of the visual information. Video codecs typically include an electronic circuit or software that compresses or decompresses digital video, and are continually being improved to provide higher coding efficiency. A video codec converts uncompressed video to a compressed format or vice versa. There are complex relationships between the video quality, the amount of data used to represent the video (determined by the bit rate), the complexity of the encoding and decoding algorithms, sensitivity to data losses and errors, ease of editing, random access, and end-to-end delay (latency). The compressed format usually conforms to a standard video compression specification, e.g., the High Efficiency Video Coding (HEVC) standard (also known as H.265 or MPEG-H Part 2), the Versatile Video Coding standard to be finalized, or other current and/or future video coding standards.
Embodiments of the disclosed technology may be applied to existing video coding standards (e.g., HEVC, H.265) and future standards to improve runtime performance. Section headings are used in the present document to improve readability of the description and do not in any way limit the discussion or the embodiments (and/or implementations) to the respective sections only.
1. Examples of Reference Pictures and Reference Picture Lists
In HEVC, there are two types of reference pictures, short-term and long-term. A reference picture may be marked as “unused for reference” when it becomes no longer needed for prediction reference. A completely new approach for reference picture management, referred to as reference picture set (RPS) or buffer description has been introduced by HEVC.
The process of marking pictures as “used for short-term reference”, “used for long-term reference”, or “unused for reference” is done using the RPS concept. An RPS is a set of picture indicators that is signaled in each slice header and consists of one set of short-term pictures and one set of long-term pictures. After the first slice header of a picture has been decoded, the pictures in the DPB are marked as specified by the RPS. The pictures in the DPB that are indicated in the short-term picture part of the RPS are kept as short-term pictures. The short-term or long-term pictures in the DPB that are indicated in the long-term picture part in the RPS are converted to or kept as long-term pictures. And finally, pictures in the DPB for which there is no indicator in the RPS are marked as unused for reference. Thus, all pictures that have been decoded that may be used as references for prediction of any subsequent pictures in decoding order must be included in the RPS.
An RPS consists of a set of picture order count (POC) values that are used for identifying the pictures in the DPB. Besides signaling POC information, the RPS also signals one flag for each picture. Each flag indicates whether the corresponding picture is available or unavailable for reference for the current picture. Note that even though a reference picture is signaled as unavailable for the current picture, it is still kept in the DPB and may be made available for reference later on and used for decoding future pictures.
From the POC information and the availability flag, five lists of reference pictures as shown in Table 1 can be created. The list RefPicSetStCurrBefore consists of short-term pictures that are available for reference for the current picture and have POC values that are lower than the POC value of the current picture. RefPicSetStCurrAfter consist of available short-term pictures with a POC value that is higher than the POC value of the current picture. RefPicSetStFoll is a list that contains all short-term pictures that are made unavailable for the current picture but may be used as reference pictures for decoding subsequent pictures in decoding order. Finally, the lists RefPicSetLtCurr and RefPicSetLtFoll contain long-term pictures that are available and unavailable for reference for the current picture, respectively.
1.1 Examples of Short-Term and Long-Term Reference Pictures
The syntax for the general sequence parameter set is shown below:
The syntax for the general slice segment header is shown below:
The semantics used in the syntax tables above are defined as:
num_short_term_ref_pic_sets specifies the number of st_ref_pic_set( ) syntax structures included in the SPS. The value of num_short_term_ref_pic_sets shall be in the range of 0 to 64, inclusive.
In some embodiments, a decoder may allocate memory for a total number of num_short_term_ref_pic_sets+1 st_ref_pic_set( ) syntax structures since there may be a st_ref_pic_set( ) syntax structure directly signaled in the slice headers of a current picture. A st_ref_pic_set( ) syntax structure directly signaled in the slice headers of a current picture has an index equal to num_short_term_ref_pic_sets.
long_term_ref_pics_present_flag equal to 0 specifies that no long-term reference picture is used for inter prediction of any coded picture in the CVS. long_term_ref_pics_present_flag equal to 1 specifies that long-term reference pictures may be used for inter prediction of one or more coded pictures in the CVS.
num_long_term_ref_pics_sps specifies the number of candidate long-term reference pictures that are specified in the SPS. The value of num_long_term_ref_pics_sps shall be in the range of 0 to 32, inclusive.
lt_ref_pic_poc_lsb_sps[i] specifies the picture order count modulo MaxPicOrderCntLsb of the i-th candidate long-term reference picture specified in the SPS. The number of bits used to represent lt_ref_pic_poc_lsb_sps[i] is equal to log 2_max_pic_order_cnt_lsb_minus4+4.
used_by_curr_pic_lt_sps_flag[i] equal to 0 specifies that the i-th candidate long-term reference picture specified in the SPS is not used for reference by a picture that includes in its long-term reference picture set (RPS) the i-th candidate long-term reference picture specified in the SPS.
short_term_ref_pic_set_sps_flag equal to 1 specifies that the short-term RPS of the current picture is derived based on one of the st_ref_pic_set( ) syntax structures in the active SPS that is identified by the syntax element short_term_ref_pic_set_idx in the slice header. short_term_ref_pic_set_sps_flag equal to 0 specifies that the short-term RPS of the current picture is derived based on the st_ref_pic_set( ) syntax structure that is directly included in the slice headers of the current picture. When num_short_term_ref_pic_sets is equal to 0, the value of short_term_ref_pic_set_sps_flag shall be equal to 0.
short_term_ref_pic_set_idx specifies the index, into the list of the st_ref_pic_set( ) syntax structures included in the active SPS, of the st_ref_pic_set( ) syntax structure that is used for derivation of the short-term RPS of the current picture. The syntax element short_term_ref_pic_set_idx is represented by Ceil(Log 2(num_short_term_ref_pic_sets)) bits. When not present, the value of short_term_ref_pic_set_idx is inferred to be equal to 0. The value of short_term_ref_pic_set_idx shall be in the range of 0 to num_short_term_ref_pic_sets−1, inclusive.
In some embodiments, the variable CurrRpsIdx is derived as follows:
num_long_term_sps specifies the number of entries in the long-term RPS of the current picture that are derived based on the candidate long-term reference pictures specified in the active SPS. The value of num_long_term_sps shall be in the range of 0 to num_long_term_ref_pics_sps, inclusive. When not present, the value of num_long_term_sps is inferred to be equal to 0.
num_long_term_pics specifies the number of entries in the long-term RPS of the current picture that are directly signaled in the slice header. When not present, the value of num_long_term_pics is inferred to be equal to 0.
In some embodiments, when nuh_layer_id is equal to 0, the value of num_long_term_pics shall be less than or equal to sps_max_dec_pic_buffering_minus1[TemporalId]−NumNegativePics[CurrRpsIdx]−NumPositivePics[CurrRpsIdx]−num_long_term_sps−TwoVersionsOfCurrDecPicFlag.
lt_idx_sps[i] specifies an index, into the list of candidate long-term reference pictures specified in the active SPS, of the i-th entry in the long-term RPS of the current picture. The number of bits used to represent lt_idx_sps[i] is equal to Ceil(Log 2(num_long_term_ref_pics_sps)). When not present, the value of lt_idx_sps[i] is inferred to be equal to 0. The value of lt_idx_sps[i] shall be in the range of 0 to num_long_term_ref_pics_sps−1, inclusive.
poc_lsb_lt[i] specifies the value of the picture order count modulo MaxPicOrderCntLsb of the i-th entry in the long-term RPS of the current picture. The length of the poc_lsb_lt[i] syntax element is log 2_max_pic_order_cnt_lsb_minus4+4 bits.
used_by_curr_pic_lt_flag[i] equal to 0 specifies that the i-th entry in the long-term RPS of the current picture is not used for reference by the current picture.
In some embodiments, the variables PocLsbLt[i] and UsedByCurrPicLt[i] are derived as follows:
delta_poc_msb_present_flag[i] equal to 1 specifies that delta_poc_msb_cycle_lt[i] is present. delta_poc_msb_present_flag[i] equal to 0 specifies that delta_poc_msb_cycle_lt[i] is not present.
In some embodiments, let prevTid0Pic be the previous picture in decoding order that has TemporalId equal to 0 and is not a RASL, RADL or SLNR picture. Let setOfPrevPocVals be a set consisting of the following:
In some embodiments, when there is more than one value in setOfPrevPocVals for which the value modulo MaxPicOrderCntLsb is equal to PocLsbLt[i], delta_poc_msb_present_flag[i] shall be equal to 1.
delta_poc_msb_cycle_lt[i] is used to determine the value of the most significant bits of the picture order count value of the i-th entry in the long-term RPS of the current picture. When delta_poc_msb_cycle_lt[i] is not present, it is inferred to be equal to 0.
In some embodiments, the variable DeltaPocMsbCycleLt[i] is derived as follows:
In some embodiments, the motion vector prediction is only allowed if the target reference picture type and the predicted reference picture type is the same. In other words, when the types are different, motion vector prediction is disallowed.
Advanced Motion Vector Prediction (AMVP) is an example of motion vector prediction that includes an existing implementation. The relevant portion of the existing AMVP implementation is detailed below.
The motion vector mvLXA and the availability flag availableFlagLXA are derived in the following ordered steps:
The motion vector mvLXB and the availability flag availableFlagLXB are derived in the following ordered steps:
Temporal Motion Vector Prediction (TMVP) is another example of motion vector prediction that includes an existing implementation. The relevant portion of the existing TMVP implementation is detailed below.
The variables mvLXCol and availableFlagLXCol are derived as follows:
Intra-block copy (IBC) has been extends the concept of motion compensation from inter-frame coding to intra-frame coding. As shown in
In HEVC-SCC, an inter-coded coding unit (CU) can apply IBC if it chooses the current picture as its reference picture. The MV is renamed as block vector (BV) in this case, and a BV always has an integer-pixel precision. To be compatible with main profile HEVC, the current picture is marked as a “long-term” reference picture in the Decoded Picture Buffer (DPB). It should be noted that similarly, in multiple view/3D video coding standards, the interview reference picture is also marked as a “long-term” reference picture.
2.1 Embodiments of Picture Marking when IBC is Enabled
Semantics related to IBC in PPS. pps_curr_pic_ref_enabled_flag equal to 1 specifies that a picture referring to the PPS may be included in a reference picture list of a slice of the picture itself. pps_curr_pic_ref_enabled_flag equal to 0 specifies that a picture referring to the PPS is never included in a reference picture list of a slice of the picture itself. When not present, the value of pps_curr_pic_ref_enabled_flag is inferred to be equal to 0.
It is a requirement of bitstream conformance that when sps_curr_pic_ref_enabled_flag is equal to 0, the value of pps_curr_pic_ref_enabled_flag shall be equal to 0.
The variable TwoVersionsOfCurrDecPicFlag is derived as follows:
TwoVersionsOfCurrDecPicFlag=pps_curr_pic_ref_enabled_flag && ( sample_adaptive_offset enabled_flag∥!pps_deblocking_filter_disabled_flag∥deblocking_filter_override_enabled_flag)
When sps_max_dec_pic_buffering_minus1[TemporalId] is equal to 0, the value of TwoVersionsOfCurrDecPicFlag shall be equal to 0.
Decoding process. The current decoded picture after the invocation of the in-loop filter process is stored in the DPB in an empty picture storage buffer, the DPB fullness is incremented by one and this picture is marked as “used for short-term reference”.
When TwoVersionsOfCurrDecPicFlag is equal to 1, the current decoded picture before the invocation of the in-loop filter process as specified in clause F.8.7 [1] is stored in the DPB in an empty picture storage buffer, the DPB fullness is incremented by one, and this picture is marked as “used for long-term reference”.
3. Examples of the Joint Exploration Model (JEM)
In some embodiments, future video coding technologies are explored using a reference software known as the Joint Exploration Model (JEM). In JEM, sub-block based prediction is adopted in several coding tools, such as affine prediction, alternative temporal motion vector prediction (ATMVP), spatial-temporal motion vector prediction (STMVP), bi-directional optical flow (BIO), Frame-Rate Up Conversion (FRUC), Locally Adaptive Motion Vector Resolution (LAMVR), Overlapped Block Motion Compensation (OBMC), Local Illumination Compensation (LIC), and Decoder-side Motion Vector Refinement (DMVR).
3.1 Examples of Alternative Temporal Motion Vector Prediction (ATMVP)
In the ATMVP method, the temporal motion vector prediction (TMVP) method is modified by fetching multiple sets of motion information (including motion vectors and reference indices) from blocks smaller than the current CU.
In the first step, a reference picture 650 and the corresponding block is determined by the motion information of the spatial neighboring blocks of the current CU 600. To avoid the repetitive scanning process of neighboring blocks, the first merge candidate in the merge candidate list of the current CU 600 is used. The first available motion vector as well as its associated reference index are set to be the temporal vector and the index to the motion source picture. This way, the corresponding block may be more accurately identified, compared with TMVP, wherein the corresponding block (sometimes called collocated block) is always in a bottom-right or center position relative to the current CU.
In the second step, a corresponding block of the sub-CU 651 is identified by the temporal vector in the motion source picture 650, by adding to the coordinate of the current CU the temporal vector. For each sub-CU, the motion information of its corresponding block (e.g., the smallest motion grid that covers the center sample) is used to derive the motion information for the sub-CU. After the motion information of a corresponding N×N block is identified, it is converted to the motion vectors and reference indices of the current sub-CU, in the same way as TMVP of HEVC, wherein motion scaling and other procedures apply. For example, the decoder checks whether the low-delay condition (e.g. the POCs of all reference pictures of the current picture are smaller than the POC of the current picture) is fulfilled and possibly uses motion vector MVx (e.g., the motion vector corresponding to reference picture list X) to predict motion vector MVy (e.g., with X being equal to 0 or 1 and Y being equal to 1−X) for each sub-CU.
4. Exemplary Methods for IBC in Video Coding
The methods 300, 400, 500, 605, 900 and 1000, described in the context of
Example 1. It is proposed that the temporal vector used in the first step of ATMVP cannot be derived from a neighboring block coded with IBC. In one example, a neighboring block with the current picture as its reference picture is marked as “unavailable” or intra-coded in the first step of ATMVP.
Example 2. It is proposed that a sub-CU's corresponding block is marked as “unavailable” or “intra-coded” if the corresponding block is coded with IBC in the second step of ATMVP.
Example 3. Alternatively, it is proposed that the motion information of a sub-CU's corresponding block is copied to the Sub-CU without any scaling if corresponding block is coded with IBC in the second step of ATMVP. The Sub-CU applies IBC with the same MV as the corresponding block but the reference picture is changed to the current picture.
Example 4. More than one ATMVP candidates may be added wherein one may be derived from temporal neighboring blocks using above methods and the other one is derived from temporal neighboring blocks with at least one sub-CU with different way of deriving sub-CU motion information if the co-located sub-CU is coded with IBC.
Listed below are some examples of the technology described in this application, listed in clause format. A block, as used in this application, can be a contiguous or a noncontiguous collection of pixels, voxels, sub-pixels, and/or sub-voxels. For example, a block can be rectilinear, such as a 4×4 square, 6×4 rectangle, or curvilinear, such as an ellipse.
A portion of the visual information, as used in this application, can be a subset of visual information. A coded representation, as used in this application, can be a bitstream representing the visual information that has been encoded using one of the techniques described in this application. An indicator, as used in this application, can be a flag or a field in the coded representation or can be multiple separate flags or fields.
A decoding technique, as used in this application can be applied by a decoder and can be implemented in hardware or software. The decoding technique can undo in reverse sequence everything a coder does. When an appropriate decoding technique is applied to an encoded representation, a visual information can be obtained as a result. An initial block in the plurality of blocks, as used in this application, is a block occurring before the first block in the coded representation. A collocated reference picture can be a reference picture used in encoding/decoding a block being encoded/decoded.
1. A method of decoding visual information (e.g., method 900 depicted in
2. A method of decoding visual information (e.g., method 1000 depicted in
3. The method of clauses 1-2, comprising: obtaining from the encoded visual information a plurality of blocks representing an encoding of a first picture; decoding an initial block in the plurality of blocks; and upon decoding the initial block, decoding a first block in remaining of the plurality of blocks based on a result of the decoding.
4. The method of clauses 1 to 3, comprising: obtaining from the encoded visual information a plurality of blocks representing an encoding of a second picture; decoding an encoding of the second picture associated with the visual information using the ATMVP decoding technique by performing a two-step process for a block being decoded in the plurality of blocks representing the encoding of the second picture, the two-step process comprising: in a first step of the two-step process obtaining a decoded reference picture of the encoded visual information, a decoded corresponding block in the reference picture corresponding to the block being decoded, and a temporal vector comprising a motion vector of the spatially neighboring block, wherein the spatially neighboring block is a spatial neighbor of the block being decoded; in a second step of the two-step process obtaining a plurality of sub-blocks representing the block being decoded, for each sub-block in the plurality of sub-blocks identifying a corresponding sub-block in the reference picture of the visual information, obtaining a motion vector of the corresponding sub-block, and based on the motion vector the corresponding sub-block deriving the motion of vector for each sub-block in the plurality of sub-blocks; and decoding the plurality of sub-blocks based on the motion vector of the sub-block and a corresponding sub-block in the reference picture of the visual information.
5. The method of clause 4, comprising: assuming that the spatially neighboring block is not encoded using the IBC coding technique.
6. The method of clauses 4-5, comprising: decoding an indicator designating the spatially neighboring block as unavailable or intra-coded for use in the first step of ATMVP decoding technique.
7. The method of clauses 4-6, comprising: decoding an indicator designating the corresponding sub-block as unavailable or intra-coded for use in the second step of ATMVP decoding technique.
8. The method of clauses 4-5, comprising: decoding an indicator designating the spatially neighboring block as using intra coding technique in the first step of ATMVP decoding technique.
9. The method of clauses 4-5, comprising: decoding an indicator designating the corresponding sub-block as using intra coding technique in the second step of ATMVP decoding technique.
10. The method of clauses 1-9, comprising: in a case that the corresponding block of the block being encoded is encoded using the IBC coding technique, copying a motion vector of the corresponding sub-block to a sub-block of the block being encoded without scaling the motion vector of the corresponding sub-block.
11. The method of clause 4, comprising: decoding an indicator associated with the corresponding block indicating that the corresponding block is encoded using the IBC coding technique; and decoding the block being decoded using the second picture as the reference picture.
12. The method of clauses 4-11, comprising: decoding an indicator associated with the corresponding sub-block indicating that the corresponding sub-block is encoded using the IBC coding technique; and decoding the sub-block using the corresponding sub-block encoded using the IBC decoding technique.
13. The method of clause 4, comprising: in a case that the corresponding block of the block being decoded is encoded using the IBC decoding technique, copying a motion vector of the corresponding sub-block to a sub-block of the block being decoded without scaling the motion vector of the corresponding sub-block.
14. The method of clause 13, comprising: changing the reference picture to the second picture including the block being encoded.
15. The method of clause 4, comprising: deriving the motion vector of the sub-block of the block being decoded based on the motion vector of at least one corresponding sub-block encoded using the IBC encoding technique.
Further aspects and variations of the methods described in clauses 1 to 15 are described in the previous section. The decoding methods may be implemented by a video decoder that may include a hardware platform such as described with respect to
16. A method for encoding a visual information, comprising:
encoding the visual information into a plurality of encoded pictures and a plurality of indicators signaling one or more encoding techniques applied, the plurality of indicators comprising an intra-block copy (IBC) technique indicator and an ATMVP technique indicator, wherein a first block of a first picture associated with the visual information is encoded using the IBC technique and a second block of a second picture associated with the visual information is encoded using the ATMVP technique, wherein the IBC technique uses a different block of the first picture to encode the first block of the first picture and the ATMVP technique uses a third picture associated with the visual information to encode the second picture.
17. The method of clause 16, comprising: dividing the first picture into a plurality of blocks; encoding an initial block in the plurality of blocks; and upon encoding the initial block, encoding a first block in the plurality of blocks based on the initial block.
18. The method of clauses 16-17, comprising: encoding the second picture associated with the visual information using the ATMVP technique by dividing the second picture into a plurality of blocks including a block being encoded and performing a two-step process comprising: in a first step of the two-step process identifying a reference picture of the visual information, a corresponding block in the reference picture corresponding to the block being encoded, and a temporal vector comprising a motion vector of a spatially neighboring block, wherein the spatially neighboring block is a spatial neighbor of the block being encoded; in a second step of the two-step process splitting the block being encoded into a plurality of sub-blocks, for each sub-block in the plurality of sub-blocks identifying a corresponding sub-block in the reference picture of the visual information, obtaining a motion vector of the corresponding sub-block, and based on the motion vector the corresponding sub-block deriving a motion of vector for each sub-block in the plurality of sub-blocks; and encoding the sub-block in the plurality of sub-blocks based on the motion vector of the sub-block and the corresponding sub-block in the reference picture of the visual information.
19. The method of clauses 18, comprising: requiring that the spatially neighboring block is not encoded using the IBC technique.
20. The method of clauses 18-19, comprising: in a case that the spatially neighboring block of the block being encoded is encoded using the IBC technique, encoding an indicator designating the spatially neighboring block as unavailable or intra-coded for use in the first step of ATMVP technique.
21. The method of clauses 18-20, comprising: in a case that the reference picture of the visual information is encoded using the IBC technique, encoding an indicator designating the corresponding sub-block as unavailable or intra-coded for use in the second step of ATMVP technique.
22. The method of clauses 18-19, comprising: in a case that the spatially neighboring block of the block being encoded is encoded using the IBC technique, encoding an indicator designating the spatially neighboring block as intra-coded for use in the first step of ATMVP technique.
23. The method of clauses 18-22, comprising: in a case that the reference picture of the visual information is encoded using the IBC technique, encoding an indicator designating the corresponding sub-block as intra-coded for use in the second step of ATMVP technique.
24. The method of clause 18, comprising: in a case that the corresponding block of the block being encoded is encoded using the IBC technique, copying a motion vector of the corresponding sub-block to a sub-block of the block being encoded without scaling the motion vector of the corresponding sub-block.
25. The method of clause 24, comprising: changing the reference picture to the second picture including the block being encoded.
26. The method of clauses 18-25, comprising: deriving the motion vector of the sub-block of the block being encoded based on the motion vector of at least one corresponding sub-block encoded using the IBC technique.
Further aspects and variations of the methods described in clauses 16-26 are described in the previous section. The decoding methods may be implemented by a video decoder that may include a hardware platform such as described with respect to
27. A video processing apparatus comprising a processor configured to implement a method recited in any one or more of clauses 1 to 26.
28. A computer readable medium having processor-executable code stored thereon, the code, upon execution, causing a processor to implement a method recited in any one or more of clauses 1 to 26.
5. Example Implementations of the Disclosed Technology
The processor(s) 705 may include central processing units (CPUs) to control the overall operation of, for example, the host computer. In certain embodiments, the processor(s) 705 accomplish this by executing software or firmware stored in memory 710. The processor(s) 705 may be, or may include, one or more programmable general-purpose or special-purpose microprocessors, digital signal processors (DSPs), programmable controllers, application specific integrated circuits (ASICs), programmable logic devices (PLDs), or the like, or a combination of such devices.
The memory 710 can be or include the main memory of the computer system. The memory 710 represents any suitable form of random access memory (RAM), read-only memory (ROM), flash memory, or the like, or a combination of such devices. In use, the memory 710 may contain, among other things, a set of machine instructions which, when executed by processor 705, causes the processor 705 to perform operations to implement embodiments of the presently disclosed technology.
Also connected to the processor(s) 705 through the interconnect 725 is a (optional) network adapter 715. The network adapter 715 provides the computer system 700 with the ability to communicate with remote devices, such as the storage clients, and/or other storage servers, and may be, for example, an Ethernet adapter or Fiber Channel adapter.
To support various functions of the mobile device 800, the memory 802 can store information and data, such as instructions, software, values, images, and other data processed or referenced by the processor 801. For example, various types of Random Access Memory (RAM) devices, Read Only Memory (ROM) devices, Flash Memory devices, and other suitable storage media can be used to implement storage functions of the memory 802. In some implementations, the mobile device 800 includes an input/output (I/O) unit 803 to interface the processor 801 and/or memory 802 to other modules, units or devices. For example, the I/O unit 803 can interface the processor 801 and memory 802 with to utilize various types of wireless interfaces compatible with typical data communication standards, e.g., such as between the one or more computers in the cloud and the user device. In some implementations, the mobile device 800 can interface with other devices using a wired connection via the I/O unit 803. The mobile device 800 can also interface with other external interfaces, such as data storage, and/or visual or audio display devices 804, to retrieve and transfer data and information that can be processed by the processor, stored in the memory, or exhibited on an output unit of a display device 804 or an external device. For example, the display device 804 can display a video frame that includes a block (a CU, PU or TU) that applies the intra-block copy based on whether the block is encoded using a motion compensation algorithm, and in accordance with the disclosed technology.
In some embodiments, a video decoder apparatus may implement a method of video decoding in which the intra-block copy as described herein is used for video decoding. The method may be similar to the above-described methods 300, 400, 500 and 605.
In some embodiments, a decoder-side method of video decoding may use the intra-block copy for improving video quality by determining whether a current block of the current picture is to be decoded using a motion compensation algorithm, and decoding, based on the determining, the current block by selectively applying an intra-block copy to the current block.
In other embodiments, a decoder-side method of video decoding may use the intra-block copy for improving video quality by determining whether a current block of the current picture is to be decoded using an intra-block copy, and decoding, based on the determining, the current block by selectively applying a motion compensation algorithm to the current block.
In some embodiments, the video decoding methods may be implemented using a decoding apparatus that is implemented on a hardware platform as described with respect to
Below are improvements measured by incorporating IBC into VTM-1.0, which is a reference software for the video coding standard named Versatile Video Coding (VVC). VTM stands for VVC Test Model.
In the above table, “Y”, “U”, “V” represent colors in the YUV color encoding system which encodes a color image or video taking human perception into account. The EncT and DecT represent a ratio of the encoding and decoding time using the IBC compared to the encoding and decoding time without the IBC, respectively. Specifically,
The various classes, such as Class A1, Class A2, etc., represent a grouping of standard video sequences used in testing performance of various video coding techniques. The negative percentages under the “Y”, “U”, “V” columns represent bit-rate savings when IBC is added to VTM-1.0. The percentages under the EncT and DecT columns that are over 100% show how much the encoding/decoding with IBC is slower than encoding/decoding without IBC. For example, a percentage of 150% means that the encoding/decoding with IBC is 50% slower than the encoding/decoding without the IBC. The percentage below 100% shows how much the encoding/decoding with IBC is faster than encoding/decoding without the IBC. Two classes, class F and class SCC, highlighted in green him and in the table above, show that bit-rate savings exceed 3%.
From the foregoing, it will be appreciated that specific embodiments of the presently disclosed technology have been described herein for purposes of illustration, but that various modifications may be made without deviating from the scope of the invention. Accordingly, the presently disclosed technology is not limited except as by the appended claims.
Implementations of the subject matter and the functional operations described in this patent document can be implemented in various systems, digital electronic circuitry, or in computer software, firmware, or hardware, including the structures disclosed in this specification and their structural equivalents, or in combinations of one or more of them. Implementations of the subject matter described in this specification can be implemented as one or more computer program products, i.e., one or more modules of computer program instructions encoded on a tangible and non-transitory computer readable medium for execution by, or to control the operation of, data processing apparatus. The computer readable medium can be a machine-readable storage device, a machine-readable storage substrate, a memory device, a composition of matter effecting a machine-readable propagated signal, or a combination of one or more of them. The term “data processing unit” or “data processing apparatus” encompasses all apparatus, devices, and machines for processing data, including by way of example a programmable processor, a computer, or multiple processors or computers. The apparatus can include, in addition to hardware, code that creates an execution environment for the computer program in question, e.g., code that constitutes processor firmware, a protocol stack, a database management system, an operating system, or a combination of one or more of them.
A computer program (also known as a program, software, software application, script, or code) can be written in any form of programming language, including compiled or interpreted languages, and it can be deployed in any form, including as a stand-alone program or as a module, component, subroutine, or other unit suitable for use in a computing environment. A computer program does not necessarily correspond to a file in a file system. A program can be stored in a portion of a file that holds other programs or data (e.g., one or more scripts stored in a markup language document), in a single file dedicated to the program in question, or in multiple coordinated files (e.g., files that store one or more modules, sub programs, or portions of code). A computer program can be deployed to be executed on one computer or on multiple computers that are located at one site or distributed across multiple sites and interconnected by a communication network.
The processes and logic flows described in this specification can be performed by one or more programmable processors executing one or more computer programs to perform functions by operating on input data and generating output. The processes and logic flows can also be performed by, and apparatus can also be implemented as, special purpose logic circuitry, e.g., an FPGA (field programmable gate array) or an ASIC (application specific integrated circuit).
Processors suitable for the execution of a computer program include, by way of example, both general and special purpose microprocessors, and any one or more processors of any kind of digital computer. Generally, a processor will receive instructions and data from a read only memory or a random access memory or both. The essential elements of a computer are a processor for performing instructions and one or more memory devices for storing instructions and data. Generally, a computer will also include, or be operatively coupled to receive data from or transfer data to, or both, one or more mass storage devices for storing data, e.g., magnetic, magneto optical disks, or optical disks. However, a computer need not have such devices. Computer readable media suitable for storing computer program instructions and data include all forms of nonvolatile memory, media and memory devices, including by way of example semiconductor memory devices, e.g., EPROM, EEPROM, and flash memory devices. The processor and the memory can be supplemented by, or incorporated in, special purpose logic circuitry.
It is intended that the specification, together with the drawings, be considered exemplary only, where exemplary means an example. As used herein, the singular forms “a”, “an” and “the” are intended to include the plural forms as well, unless the context clearly indicates otherwise. Additionally, the use of “or” is intended to include “and/or”, unless the context clearly indicates otherwise.
While this patent document contains many specifics, these should not be construed as limitations on the scope of any invention or of what may be claimed, but rather as descriptions of features that may be specific to particular embodiments of particular inventions. Certain features that are described in this patent document in the context of separate embodiments can also be implemented in combination in a single embodiment. Conversely, various features that are described in the context of a single embodiment can also be implemented in multiple embodiments separately or in any suitable subcombination. Moreover, although features may be described above as acting in certain combinations and even initially claimed as such, one or more features from a claimed combination can in some cases be excised from the combination, and the claimed combination may be directed to a subcombination or variation of a subcombination.
Similarly, while operations are depicted in the drawings in a particular order, this should not be understood as requiring that such operations be performed in the particular order shown or in sequential order, or that all illustrated operations be performed, to achieve desirable results. Moreover, the separation of various system components in the embodiments described in this patent document should not be understood as requiring such separation in all embodiments.
Only a few implementations and examples are described and other implementations, enhancements and variations can be made based on what is described and illustrated in this patent document.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/CN2018/089920 | Jun 2018 | WO | international |
This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 17/011,131, filed on Sep. 3, 2020, which is a continuation of International Application No. PCT/IB2019/054611, filed on Jun. 4, 2019, which claims the priority to and benefits of International Patent Application No. PCT/CN2018/089920, filed on Jun. 5, 2018. All the patent applications are hereby incorporated by reference in their entireties.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
7529302 | Mukerjee et al. | May 2009 | B2 |
8184715 | Rosenzweig et al. | May 2012 | B1 |
8462846 | Zhang | Jun 2013 | B2 |
9294777 | Wang | Mar 2016 | B2 |
9374595 | Kim et al. | Jun 2016 | B2 |
9521425 | Chen et al. | Dec 2016 | B2 |
9615089 | Fartukov et al. | Apr 2017 | B2 |
9667996 | Chen et al. | May 2017 | B2 |
9674542 | Chen et al. | Jun 2017 | B2 |
9762927 | Chen et al. | Sep 2017 | B2 |
9900593 | Xiu et al. | Feb 2018 | B2 |
9948930 | Panusopone et al. | Apr 2018 | B2 |
9955186 | Chon et al. | Apr 2018 | B2 |
10045014 | Zhang et al. | Aug 2018 | B2 |
10142655 | Lin et al. | Nov 2018 | B2 |
10298950 | Wang et al. | May 2019 | B2 |
10362330 | Li et al. | Jul 2019 | B1 |
10404990 | Hendry et al. | Sep 2019 | B2 |
10419763 | Huang et al. | Sep 2019 | B2 |
10448010 | Chen et al. | Oct 2019 | B2 |
10484686 | Xiu et al. | Nov 2019 | B2 |
10523964 | Chuang et al. | Dec 2019 | B2 |
10560712 | Zou et al. | Feb 2020 | B2 |
10701366 | Chen et al. | Jun 2020 | B2 |
10708592 | Dong et al. | Jul 2020 | B2 |
10757417 | Zhang et al. | Aug 2020 | B2 |
10778999 | Li et al. | Sep 2020 | B2 |
10779002 | Chen et al. | Sep 2020 | B2 |
10785494 | Chien et al. | Sep 2020 | B2 |
10805630 | Li et al. | Oct 2020 | B2 |
10841609 | Liu et al. | Nov 2020 | B1 |
10904565 | Chuang et al. | Jan 2021 | B2 |
11066131 | Zhang et al. | May 2021 | B2 |
11172196 | Zhang et al. | Nov 2021 | B2 |
11197003 | Zhang et al. | Dec 2021 | B2 |
11197007 | Zhang et al. | Dec 2021 | B2 |
11202065 | Zhang et al. | Dec 2021 | B2 |
11202081 | Zhang et al. | Dec 2021 | B2 |
20070192762 | Eichenberger et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20110002386 | Zhang | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110194609 | Rusert et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110200107 | Ryu | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20120219216 | Sato | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120287999 | Li et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120320984 | Zhou et al. | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20130101041 | Fishwick et al. | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20130107958 | Shimada et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20130128976 | Koyama et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20130182755 | Chen et al. | Jul 2013 | A1 |
20130229485 | Rusanovskyy et al. | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20130329007 | Zhang et al. | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20140086325 | Chen et al. | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140286408 | Zhang et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140286416 | Jeon et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140294066 | Kondo | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20140334551 | Kim et al. | Nov 2014 | A1 |
20150023423 | Zhang et al. | Jan 2015 | A1 |
20150181216 | Zhang et al. | Jun 2015 | A1 |
20150249828 | Rosewarne et al. | Sep 2015 | A1 |
20150312588 | Yamamoto et al. | Oct 2015 | A1 |
20150373350 | Hendry et al. | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20150373357 | Pang et al. | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20150373362 | Pang et al. | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20160057420 | Pang et al. | Feb 2016 | A1 |
20160073132 | Zhang et al. | Mar 2016 | A1 |
20160100189 | Pang et al. | Apr 2016 | A1 |
20160142729 | Wang et al. | May 2016 | A1 |
20160366441 | An et al. | Dec 2016 | A1 |
20160373756 | Yu | Dec 2016 | A1 |
20170054996 | Xu et al. | Feb 2017 | A1 |
20170142418 | Li et al. | May 2017 | A1 |
20170223378 | Tao et al. | Aug 2017 | A1 |
20170238005 | Chien et al. | Aug 2017 | A1 |
20170238011 | Pettersson et al. | Aug 2017 | A1 |
20170272748 | Seregin et al. | Sep 2017 | A1 |
20170272782 | Li et al. | Sep 2017 | A1 |
20170289566 | He et al. | Oct 2017 | A1 |
20170310990 | Hsu | Oct 2017 | A1 |
20170332095 | Zou et al. | Nov 2017 | A1 |
20170332099 | Lee et al. | Nov 2017 | A1 |
20170339404 | Panusopone et al. | Nov 2017 | A1 |
20170339405 | Wang et al. | Nov 2017 | A1 |
20180041762 | Ikai et al. | Feb 2018 | A1 |
20180048889 | Zhang et al. | Feb 2018 | A1 |
20180054628 | Pettersson et al. | Feb 2018 | A1 |
20180063553 | Zhang et al. | Mar 2018 | A1 |
20180098062 | Li et al. | Apr 2018 | A1 |
20180098087 | Li et al. | Apr 2018 | A1 |
20180124394 | Xu et al. | May 2018 | A1 |
20180131952 | Xiu et al. | May 2018 | A1 |
20180184117 | Chen et al. | Jun 2018 | A1 |
20180192069 | Chen et al. | Jul 2018 | A1 |
20180192072 | Chen et al. | Jul 2018 | A1 |
20180199056 | Sato | Jul 2018 | A1 |
20180247396 | Pouli et al. | Aug 2018 | A1 |
20180270500 | Li et al. | Sep 2018 | A1 |
20180278951 | Seregin et al. | Sep 2018 | A1 |
20180288425 | Panusopone et al. | Oct 2018 | A1 |
20180288441 | Zhang et al. | Oct 2018 | A1 |
20180324454 | Lin et al. | Nov 2018 | A1 |
20180332298 | Liu et al. | Nov 2018 | A1 |
20180376166 | Chuang et al. | Dec 2018 | A1 |
20190020895 | Liu et al. | Jan 2019 | A1 |
20190037231 | Ikai et al. | Jan 2019 | A1 |
20190052886 | Chiang et al. | Feb 2019 | A1 |
20190058897 | Han et al. | Feb 2019 | A1 |
20190068977 | Zhang et al. | Feb 2019 | A1 |
20190075293 | Lim et al. | Mar 2019 | A1 |
20190104303 | Xiu et al. | Apr 2019 | A1 |
20190124332 | Lim et al. | Apr 2019 | A1 |
20190158866 | Kim | May 2019 | A1 |
20190182504 | Lainema | Jun 2019 | A1 |
20190191171 | Ikai | Jun 2019 | A1 |
20190222859 | Chuang et al. | Jul 2019 | A1 |
20190246128 | Xu | Aug 2019 | A1 |
20190246143 | Zhang | Aug 2019 | A1 |
20190273943 | Zhao et al. | Sep 2019 | A1 |
20190306502 | Gadde et al. | Oct 2019 | A1 |
20190320181 | Chen et al. | Oct 2019 | A1 |
20190335170 | Lee et al. | Oct 2019 | A1 |
20190342547 | Lee et al. | Nov 2019 | A1 |
20190364295 | Li et al. | Nov 2019 | A1 |
20190373261 | Eglimez et al. | Dec 2019 | A1 |
20190387250 | Boyce et al. | Dec 2019 | A1 |
20200021837 | Ikai et al. | Jan 2020 | A1 |
20200045310 | Chen et al. | Feb 2020 | A1 |
20200045311 | Yoo | Feb 2020 | A1 |
20200053364 | Seo | Feb 2020 | A1 |
20200084441 | Lee et al. | Mar 2020 | A1 |
20200084454 | Liu et al. | Mar 2020 | A1 |
20200099951 | Hung et al. | Mar 2020 | A1 |
20200112741 | Han et al. | Apr 2020 | A1 |
20200120334 | Xu et al. | Apr 2020 | A1 |
20200128237 | Xu et al. | Apr 2020 | A1 |
20200128258 | Chen et al. | Apr 2020 | A1 |
20200137398 | Zhao et al. | Apr 2020 | A1 |
20200145688 | Zou et al. | May 2020 | A1 |
20200154127 | Lee | May 2020 | A1 |
20200169726 | Kim et al. | May 2020 | A1 |
20200213594 | Liu et al. | Jul 2020 | A1 |
20200213612 | Liu et al. | Jul 2020 | A1 |
20200213622 | Xu et al. | Jul 2020 | A1 |
20200221077 | Park et al. | Jul 2020 | A1 |
20200221110 | Chien et al. | Jul 2020 | A1 |
20200221120 | Robert et al. | Jul 2020 | A1 |
20200267408 | Lee et al. | Aug 2020 | A1 |
20200275120 | Lin et al. | Aug 2020 | A1 |
20200296380 | Aono et al. | Sep 2020 | A1 |
20200296382 | Zhao et al. | Sep 2020 | A1 |
20200296415 | Chen et al. | Sep 2020 | A1 |
20200336738 | Xiu et al. | Oct 2020 | A1 |
20200351505 | Seo | Nov 2020 | A1 |
20200359029 | Liu et al. | Nov 2020 | A1 |
20200374543 | Liu et al. | Nov 2020 | A1 |
20200374544 | Liu et al. | Nov 2020 | A1 |
20200382771 | Liu et al. | Dec 2020 | A1 |
20200382795 | Zhang et al. | Dec 2020 | A1 |
20200382807 | Liu et al. | Dec 2020 | A1 |
20200396453 | Zhang et al. | Dec 2020 | A1 |
20200396462 | Zhang et al. | Dec 2020 | A1 |
20200396465 | Zhang et al. | Dec 2020 | A1 |
20200404255 | Zhang et al. | Dec 2020 | A1 |
20200404260 | Zhang et al. | Dec 2020 | A1 |
20200413048 | Zhang et al. | Dec 2020 | A1 |
20210006780 | Zhang et al. | Jan 2021 | A1 |
20210006787 | Zhang et al. | Jan 2021 | A1 |
20210029356 | Zhang et al. | Jan 2021 | A1 |
20210029362 | Liu et al. | Jan 2021 | A1 |
20210029368 | Zhang et al. | Jan 2021 | A1 |
20210037240 | Zhang et al. | Feb 2021 | A1 |
20210037256 | Zhang et al. | Feb 2021 | A1 |
20210051339 | Liu et al. | Feb 2021 | A1 |
20210067783 | Liu et al. | Mar 2021 | A1 |
20210076050 | Zhang et al. | Mar 2021 | A1 |
20210076063 | Liu et al. | Mar 2021 | A1 |
20210092379 | Zhang et al. | Mar 2021 | A1 |
20210092435 | Liu et al. | Mar 2021 | A1 |
20210105482 | Zhang et al. | Apr 2021 | A1 |
20210152846 | Zhang et al. | May 2021 | A1 |
20210218980 | Zhang et al. | Jul 2021 | A1 |
20210227234 | Zhang et al. | Jul 2021 | A1 |
20210352302 | Zhang et al. | Nov 2021 | A1 |
20210392341 | Zhang et al. | Dec 2021 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
3025490 | Dec 2017 | CA |
3037685 | Mar 2018 | CA |
1672174 | Sep 2005 | CN |
1710959 | Dec 2005 | CN |
1777283 | May 2006 | CN |
101605255 | Dec 2009 | CN |
101895751 | Nov 2010 | CN |
102577388 | Jul 2012 | CN |
103561263 | Feb 2014 | CN |
104053005 | Sep 2014 | CN |
104170381 | Nov 2014 | CN |
104221376 | Dec 2014 | CN |
104904207 | Sep 2015 | CN |
105306944 | Feb 2016 | CN |
105532000 | Apr 2016 | CN |
105678808 | Jun 2016 | CN |
105723713 | Jun 2016 | CN |
105917650 | Aug 2016 | CN |
106303543 | Jan 2017 | CN |
106416245 | Feb 2017 | CN |
106537915 | Mar 2017 | CN |
106559669 | Apr 2017 | CN |
106688232 | May 2017 | CN |
107079161 | Aug 2017 | CN |
107113424 | Aug 2017 | CN |
107113442 | Aug 2017 | CN |
107211156 | Sep 2017 | CN |
107409225 | Nov 2017 | CN |
107426568 | Dec 2017 | CN |
107615765 | Jan 2018 | CN |
107852490 | Mar 2018 | CN |
107534778 | Apr 2018 | CN |
107925775 | Apr 2018 | CN |
107979756 | May 2018 | CN |
108012153 | May 2018 | CN |
108028929 | May 2018 | CN |
108432250 | Aug 2018 | CN |
108632629 | Oct 2018 | CN |
112020829 | Dec 2020 | CN |
2539213 | Dec 2016 | GB |
H08186825 | Jul 1996 | JP |
2007272733 | Oct 2007 | JP |
2011077761 | Apr 2011 | JP |
2013098745 | May 2013 | JP |
2021513818 | May 2021 | JP |
20200128154 | Nov 2020 | KR |
201540047 | Oct 2015 | TW |
201709738 | Mar 2017 | TW |
201832557 | Sep 2018 | TW |
2000065829 | Nov 2000 | WO |
2009080133 | Jul 2009 | WO |
2013168407 | Nov 2013 | WO |
2016048834 | Mar 2016 | WO |
2016057701 | Apr 2016 | WO |
2016091161 | Jun 2016 | WO |
2016138513 | Sep 2016 | WO |
2016183224 | Nov 2016 | WO |
2017130696 | Mar 2017 | WO |
2017118411 | Jul 2017 | WO |
2017133661 | Aug 2017 | WO |
2017157264 | Sep 2017 | WO |
2017157281 | Sep 2017 | WO |
2017165391 | Sep 2017 | WO |
2017188509 | Nov 2017 | WO |
2017195554 | Nov 2017 | WO |
2017197126 | Nov 2017 | WO |
2017197146 | Nov 2017 | WO |
2018067823 | Nov 2017 | WO |
2017206803 | Dec 2017 | WO |
2018047668 | Mar 2018 | WO |
2018066241 | Apr 2018 | WO |
2018097692 | May 2018 | WO |
2018097693 | Jul 2018 | WO |
2018184589 | Oct 2018 | WO |
2020086331 | Apr 2020 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Bross et al. “Versatile Video Coding (Draft 2),” Joint Video Experts Team (JVET) of ITU-T SG 16 WP 3 and ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 29/WG 11, 11th Meeting, Ljubljana, SI, Jul. 10-18, 2018, document JVET-K1001, 2018. |
Bross et al. “Versatile Video Coding (Draft 4),” Joint Video Experts Team (JVET) of ITU-T SG 16 WP 3 and ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 29/WG 11, 13th Meeting, Marrakech, MA, Jan. 9-18, 2019, document JVET-M1001, 2019. |
Bross et al. “Versatile Video Coding (Draft 5),” Joint Video Experts Team (JVET) of ITU-T SG 16 WP 3 and ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 29/WG 11, 14th Meeting, Geneva, CH, Mar. 19-27, 2019, document JVET-N1001, 2019. |
Xu et al. “CE8-Related Combination Test of JVET-N0176/JVET-N0317/JVET-N0382 on Simplification of IBC Vector Prediction,” Joint Video Experts Team (JVET) of ITU-T SG 16 WP 3 and ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 29/WG 11, 14th Meeting, Geneva, CH, Mar. 19-27, 2019, document JVET-N0843, 2019. |
Chen et al. “EE3: Generalized Bi-Prediction,” Joint Video Exploration Team (JVET) of ITU-T SG 16 WP 3 and ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 29/WG 11, 4th Meeting, Chengdu, CN, Oct. 15-21, 2016, document JVET-D0102, 2016. |
JEM-7.0: https://jvet.hhi.fraunhofer.de/svn/svn_HMJEMSoftware/tags/ HM-16.6-JEM-7.0. (only website). |
Han et al. “CE4-Related: Modification on Merge List,” Joint Video Exploration Team (JVET) of ITU-T SG 16 WP 3 and ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 29/WG 11, 13th Meeting, Marrakech, MA, Jan. 9-18, 2019, document JVET-M0127, 2019. |
“High Efficiency Video Coding” Series H: Audiovisual and Multimedia Systems: Infrastructure of Audiovisual Services—Coding of Moving Video, ITU-T, H.265, 2018. |
Hsiao et al. “CE4.2.8: Merge Mode Enhancement,” Joint Video Experts Team (JVET of ITU-T SG 16 WP 3 and ISO/EC JTC 1/SC 29/WG 11, 11th Meeting: Ljubljana, SI, Jul. 10-18, 2018, document JVET-K0245, 2018. |
Hsiao et al. “CE4.4.12: Pairwise Average Candidates,” Joint Video Experts Team (JVET) of ITU-T SG 16 WP 3 and ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 29/WG 11, 12th Meeting, Macao, CN, Oct. 3-12, 2018, document JVET-L0090, 2019. |
H.265/HEVC, https://www.itu.int/rec/T-REC-H.265. |
Lee et al. “Unified Condition for Affine Merge and Affine Inter Mode,” Joint Video Exploration Team (JVET) of ITU-T SG 16 WP 3 and ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 29/WG 11, 5th Meeting, Geneva, CH, Jan. 12-20, 2017, JVET-E0039, 2017. |
Liao et al. “CE10.1.b: Triangular Prediction Unit Mode,” Joint Video Exploration Team (JVET) of ITU-T SG 16 WP 3 and ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 29/WG 11, 12th Meeting, Macao, CN, Oct. 3-12, 2018, document JVET-L0124. 2018. |
Li et al. “Multi-Type-Tree.” Joint Video Exploration Team (JVET), of ITU-T SG 16 WP 3 and ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 29/WG 11, 4th Meeting: Chengdu, CN, Oct. 15-21, 2016, document JVET-D0117rl, 2016. |
Li et al. “Non-CE4: Harmonization between HMVP and Gbi,” Joint Video Experts Team (JVET) of ITU-T SG 16 WP 3 and ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 29/WG 11, 13th Meeting: Marrakech, MA, Jan. 9-18, 2019, document JVET-M0264, 2019. |
Luthra et al. Overview of the H.264/AVC Video Coding Standard, Proc. SPIE, 5203, Applications of Digital Image Processing, Nov. 19, 2003, Optical Science and Technology, SPIE 48th annutal Meeting, San Diego, CA, US, 2003. |
Su et al. “CE4.4.1: Generalized Bi-Prediction for Intercoding,” Joint Video Exploration Team of ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 29/WG 11 and ITU-T SG 16, Ljubljana, Jul. 11-18, 2018, document No. JVET-K0248, 2018. |
Sullivan et al. “Overview of the High Efficiency Video Coding (HEVC) Standard,” IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology, Dec. 2012, 22(12):1649-1668. |
Yang et al. “Description of Core Experiment 4 (CE4): Inter Prediction and Motion Vector Coding,” Joint Video Experts Team (JVET) of ITU-T SG 16 WP 3 and ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 29/WG 11, 11th Meeting, Ljubljana, SI, Jul. 10-18, 2018, document JVET-K1024, 2018. |
Zhang et al. “CE4-Related: Simplified Affine Prediction,” Joint Video Experts Team (JVET) of ITU-T SG 16 WP 3 and ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 29/WG 11, 11th Meeting, Ljubljana, SI, Jul. 10-18, 2018, document JVET-K0103. 2018. |
Zhang et al. “CE4-related: History-based Motion Vector Prediction”, Joint Video Experts Team (JVET) of ITU-T SG 16 WP 3 and ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 29/WG 11, 11th Meeting, Ljubljana, SI, 10-18 (Jul. 2018), Document JVET-K0104, 2018. |
Zhang et al. “CE4.2.14: Planar Motion Vector Prediction,” Joint Video Experts Team (JVET) of ITU-T SG 16 and WP 3 and ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 29/WG 11, 11th Meeting: Ljubljaba, SI, Jul. 10-18, 2018, document JVET-K0135, 2018. |
Zhang et al. “CE4: Affine Prediction with 4×4 Sub-blocks for Chroma Components (Test 4.1.16),” Joint Video Experts Team (JVET) of ITU-T SG 16 WP 3 and ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 29/WG 11, 12th Meeting, Macao, CN, Oct. 3-12, 2018, document JVET-L0265, 2018. |
Zhang et al. “CE3-Related: Modified Chroma Derived Mode,” Joint Video Experts Team (JVET) of ITU-T SG 16 WP 3 and ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 29/WG 11, 12th Meeting, Macao, CN, Oct. 3-12, 2018, document JVET-L0272, 2018. |
Zhang et al. “Adaptive Motion Vector Resolution Rounding Align,” Joint Video Experts Team (JVET) of ITU-T SG 16 WP 3 and ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 2/WG 11, 12th Meeting, Macao, CN, Oct. 3-12, 2018, document JVET-L0377, 2018. |
Zhang et al. “BoG Report on CE4 Related Contributions,” Joint Video Experts Team (JVET) of ITU-T SG 16 WP 3 and ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 29/WG 11, 13th Meeting: Marrakech, MA, Jan. 9-18, 2019, document JVET-M0843, 2019. |
Zhou et al. “Spatial-Temporal Merge Mode (Non Subblock STMVP),” Joint Video Exploration Team (JVET) of ITU-T SG 16 WP 3 and ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 29/WG 11, 11th Meeting: Ljubljana, SI, Jul. 10-18, 2018, document JVET-K0532, and JVET-K0161, 2018. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion from PCT/CN2019/117116 dated Jan. 2, 2020 (9 pages). |
International Search Report and Written Opinion from PCT/CN2019/117118 dated Feb. 5, 2020 (9 pages). |
International Search Report and Written Opinion from PCT/CN2019/117119 dated Jan. 23, 2020 (9 pages). |
International Search Report and Written Opinion from PCT/IB2019/055244 dated Nov. 18, 2019 (18 pages). |
International Search Report and Written Opinion from PCT/IB2019/055246 dated Nov. 7, 2019 (18 pages). |
International Search Report and Written Opinion from PCT/IB2019/055247 dated Nov. 7, 2019 (21 pages). |
International Search Report and Written Opinion from PCT/IB2019/058078 dated Mar. 3, 2020(20 pages). |
International Search Report and Written Opinion from PCT/IB2019/058079 dated Mar. 3, 2020(26 pages). |
International Search Report and Written Opinion from No. PCT/IB2019/058081 dated Mar. 25, 2020(21 pages). |
Non-Final Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 17/071,357 dated Dec. 8, 2020. |
Non-Final Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 17/074,842 dated Dec. 23, 2020. |
Non-Final Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 17/074,892 dated Dec. 24, 2020. |
Non-Final Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 17/099,042 dated Dec. 31, 2020. |
Notice of Allowance from U.S. Appl. No. 17/071,412 dated Jan. 7, 2021. |
Non-Final Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 17/161,391 dated Mar. 25, 2021. |
Li et al. “Affine Deformation Model Based Intra Block Copy for Intra Frame Coding,” 2020, Institute of Information and Communication Engineering, Zhejiang University. |
Van Der Auwera et al. “Description of Core Experiment 3: Intra Prediction and Mode Coding,” Joint Video Experts Team (JVET) of ITU-T SG 16 WP 3 and ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 29/WG 11, 10th Meeting, San Diego, USA, Apr. 10-20, 2018. document JVET-J1023, 2018. |
Advisory Action from U.S. Appl. No. 17/074,892 dated Aug. 4, 2021. |
Non-Final Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 17/071,357 dated Sep. 21, 2021. |
Chen et al. “Algorithm Description of Joint Exploration Test Model 7 (JEM 7),” Joint Video Exploration Team (JVET) of ITU-T SG 16 WP 3 and ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 29/WG 11, 7th Meeting, Torino, IT, Jul. 13-21, 2017, document JVET-G1001, 2017. |
Chen et al. “Description of SDR, HDR and 360 degree Video Coding Technology Proposal by Qualcomm and Technicolor—low and high complexity versions,” Joint Video Exploration Team (JVET) of ITU-T SG 16 WP 3 and ISO/EC JTC 1/SC 29/WG 11, 10th Meeting, San Diego, US, Apr. 10-20, 2018, document JVET-J0021, 2018. |
Chen et al. “DMVR Extension baed on Template Matching,” Joint Video Exploration Team (JVET) of ITU-T SG 16 WP 3 and ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 29/WG 11, 10th Meeting, San Diego, US, Apr. 10-20, 2018, document JVET-J0057, 2018. |
Chien et al. “Modification of Merge Candidate Derivation,” Joint Video Exploration Team (JVET) of ITU-T SG 16 WP 3 and ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 29/WG 11, 2nd Meeting, San Diego, USA, Feb. 20-26, 2016, document JVET-B0058, 2016. |
He et al. “Non-SCCE1: Improved Intra Block Copy Coding with Block Vector Derivation,” Joint Collaborative Team on Video Coding (JCT-VC) of ITU-T SG 16 WP 3 and ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 29/WG 11, 18th Meeting, Sapporo, JP, Jun. 30-Jul. 9, 2017, document JCTVC-R0165, 2014. |
Hsu et al. “Description of SDR Video Coding Technology Proposal by Mediatek,” Joint Video Experts Team (JVET) of ITU-T SG 16 WP 3 and ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 29/WG 11, 10th Meeting, San Diego, US, Apr. 10-20, 2018, document JVET-J0018, 2018. |
Li et al. “Adaptive Motion Vector Resolution for Screen Content,” Joint Collaborative Team on Video Coding (JCT-VC) of ITU-T SG 16 WP 3 and ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 29/WG 11, 19th Meeting, Strasbourg, FR, Oct. 17-24, 2014, document JCTVC-S0085, 2014. |
Toma et al. “Description of SDR Video Coding Technology Proposal by Panasonic,” Joint Video Experts Team (JVET) of ITU-T SG 16 WP 3 and ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 29/WG 11, 10th Meetingmm San Diego, US, Apr. 10-20, 2018, document JVET-J0020, 2018. |
Xu et al. “Intra Block Copy in HEVC Screen Content Coding Extensions,” IEEE Journal on Emerging and Selected Topics in Circuits and Systems, Dec. 2016, 6(4):409-419. |
Zhang et al. “Rotate Intra Block Copy for Still Image Coding,” 2015 IEEE International Conference on Image Processing (ICIP), IEEE, Sep. 27, 2015, pp. 4102-4106. |
Zhang et al. “On Adaptive Motion Vector Resolution,” Joint Collaborative Team on Video Coding (JCT-VC) of ITU-T SG 16 WP 3 and ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 29/WG 11, 20th Meeting, Geneva, CH, Feb. 10-18, 2015, document JCTVC-T0059, 2015. |
Zou et al. “Improved Affine Motion Prediction,” Joint Video Exploration Team (JVET) of ITU-T SG 16 WP3 and ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 29/WG 11, 3rd Meeting, Geneva, CH, May 26-Jun. 1, 2016, document JVET-C0062, 2016. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion from PCT/IB2019/054602 dated Aug. 21, 2019 (17 pages). |
International Search Report and Written Opinion from PCT/IB2019/054604 dated Sep. 26, 2019 (17 pages). |
International Search Report and Written Opinion from PCT/IB2019/054611 dated Aug. 29, 2019 (88 pages). |
International Search Report and Written Opinion from PCT/IB2019/054612 dated Sep. 26, 2019 (17 pages). |
International Search Report and Written Opinion from PCT/IB2019/054614 dated Aug. 27, 2019 (14 pages). |
International Search Report and Written Opinion from PCT/IB2019/054650 dated Oct. 28, 2019 (20 pages). |
International Search Report and Written Opinion from PCT/IB2019/054652 dated Sep. 27, 2019 (18 pages). |
International Search Report and Written Opinion from PCT/IB2019/054654 dated Aug. 27, 2019 (85 pages). |
Sullivan et al. “Meeting Report of the 18th Meeting of the Joint Collaborative Team on Video Coding (JCT-VC), Sapporo, JP, Jun. 30-Jul. 9, 2014”, Joint Collaborative Team on Video Coding (JCT-VC) of ITU-T SG16 WP3 and ISO/IEC JTC1/SC29/WG11, 18th Meeting: Sapporo, JP, Jun. 30-Jul. 9, 2014, JCTVC-R_Notes_d, 2014. |
Non-Final Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 17/019,629 dated Nov. 13, 2020. |
Non-Final Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 17/011,157 dated Nov. 17, 2020. |
Non-Final Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 17/031,451 dated Dec. 4, 2020. |
Non-Final Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 17/005,521 dated Jan. 7, 2021. |
Li et al. “Combining Directional Intra Prediction and Intra Block Copy with Block Partitioning for HEVC,” 2016 IEEE International Conference on Image Processing (ICIP), Phoenix, AZ, USA, 2016, pp. 524-528. |
Final Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 17/019,629 dated Feb. 26, 2021. |
Final Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 17/031,451 dated Dec. 21, 2021. |
Notice of Allowance n from U.S. Appl. No. 17/071,357 dated Feb. 2, 2022. |
Office Action from Indian Patent Application No. 202127002718 dated Jan. 6, 2022. |
Final Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 17/161,391 dated Jul. 14, 2021. |
Alshin et al. “Bi-Directional Optical Flow for Improving Motion Compensation,” 28th Picture Coding Symposium, PCS2010, Dec. 8, 2010, Nagoya, Japan, pp. 422-425. |
Chen et al. “Description of SDR, HDR and 360 degree Video Coding Technology Proposal by Huawei, GoPro, HiSilicon, and Samsung,” Joint Video Exploration Team (JVET) of ITU-T SG 16 WP 3 and ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 29/WG 11, 10th Meeting, San Diego, US, 10-20, Apr. 2018, document JVET-J0025, 2018. |
Notice of Allowance from U.S. Appl. No. 17/011,131 dated Dec. 10, 2020. |
Final Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 17/005,521 dated Apr. 26, 2021. |
Huang, Wanzhang, “Research on Side Information Generation of Distributed Video Coding,” South China University of Technology, Guangzhou, China, 2012. |
Jang et al. “Non-CE8: Modification on SbTMVP Process Regarding with CPR,” Joint Video Experts Team (JVET) of ITU-T SG 16 WP3 and ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 29/WG 11, 13th Meeting, Marrakech, MA, Jan. 9-18, 2019, document JVET-M0335, 2019. |
Lai et al. “CE8-Related: Clarification on Interaction Between CPR and other Inter Coding Tools,” Joint Video Experts feram (JVET) of ITU-T SG 16 WP 3 and ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 29/WG 11, 13th Meeting, Marrakech, MA, Jan. 9-18, 2019, document JVET-M0175, 2019. |
Xu et al. “Non-CE8: Mismatch Between Text Specification and Reference Software on ATMVP Candidate Derivation When CPR is Enabled,” Joint Video Experts Team (JVET) of ITU-T SG 16 WP 3 and ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 29/WG 11, 13th Meeting, Marrakech, MA, Jan. 9-18, 2019, document JVET-M0409, 2019. |
Zhao et al. “Intra Mini-Block Copy Algorithm for Screen Content Coding,” Journal of Computer Applications, 2016, 36(7): 1938-1943. |
Zuo et al. “Intra Block Copy for Intra-Frame Coding,” Joint Video Experts Team (JVET) of ITU-T SG 16 WP 3 and ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 29/WG 11 10th Meeting: San Diego, US, Apr. 10-20, 2018, document JVET-J0042, 2018. |
Non Final Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 17/019,629 dated Jun. 8, 2022. |
Bross et al. “Versatile Video Coding (Draft 3),” Joint Video Experts Team (JVET) of ITU-T SG 16 WP 3 and ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 29/WG 11 12th Meeting, Macao, CN, Oct. 3-12, 2018. document JVET-L1001, 2018. |
Solovyev et al. “Non-CE4: Merge Mode Modification,” Joint Video Experts Team (JVET) of ITU-T SG 16 WP 3 and ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 29/WG 11 11th Meeting: Ljubljana, SI, Jul. 10-18, 2018, document JVET-K0056, 2018. |
Yang et al. “BoG Report on CE4 Related Contributions,” Joint Video Experts Team (JVET) of ITU-T SG 16 WP 3 and ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 29/WG 11 11th Meeting: Ljubljana, SI, Jul. 10-18, 2018, document JVET-K0546, 2018. |
Zhang et al. “AHG16: Clean-up on MV Rounding,” Joint Video Experts Team (JVET) of ITU-T SG 16 WP 3 and ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 29/WG 11, 13th Meeting, Marrakech, MA Jan. 9-18, 2019, document JVET-M0265, 2019. |
Extended European Search Report from European Patent Application No. 19882864.2 dated Mar. 21, 2022 (9 pages). |
Koyama et al. “Modification of Derivation Process of Motion Vector Information for Interface Format,” Joint Collaborative Team on Video Coding (JCT-VC) of ITU-T SG16 WP3 and ISO/IEC JTC1/SC29/WG11 7th Meeting: Geneva, CH, Nov. 21-30, 2011, document JCTVC-G196, 2011. (cited in JP2021-524354 OA dated Aug. 2, 2022). |
Shimada et al. “Non-CE9/Non-CE13: Averaged Merge Candidate,” Joint Collaborative Team on Video Coding (JCT-VC) of ITU-T SG16 WP3 and ISO/IEC JTC1/SC29/WG11 7th Meeting: Geneva, CH, Nov. 21-30, 2011, document JCTVC-G195, 2011. (cited in JP2021-524354 OA dated Aug. 2, 2022). |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20210203958 A1 | Jul 2021 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 17011131 | Sep 2020 | US |
Child | 17201896 | US | |
Parent | PCT/IB2019/054611 | Jun 2019 | US |
Child | 17011131 | US |