Interactive 3D cursor

Abstract
An interactive 3D cursor facilitates selection and manipulation of a three-dimensional volume from any three-dimensional image. The selected volume image may be transparency-adjusted and filtered to remove selected items from view. Qualitative and quantitative analysis within a selected volume may be performed. Location indicators, annotations, and registration markers may be overlaid on selected volume images.
Description
TECHNICAL FIELD

Aspects of this disclosure are generally related to human-machine interfaces, and more particularly to cursors.


BACKGROUND

The typical arrow-shaped cursor presented by a computer operating system is zero-dimensional. A zero-dimensional cursor designates the location of a single point in a space such as a two-dimensional window presented on a monitor. Mouse buttons can be used in combination with movement of the cursor to select objects in the two-dimensional space, but at any given instant of time a zero-dimensional cursor position designates only a single point in space.


The current standard for diagnostic radiologists reviewing computed tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) studies is a slice-by-slice method. A conventional keyboard, monitor, and mouse with a zero-dimensional cursor are used for manipulating the images. The use of mouse buttons and cursor movement for manipulating the images can become burdensome. For example, many images are included in radiology studies that are performed for the follow up of cancer to determine the response to treatment. The ability to recognize and analyze differences between images can be important. As an example, the recent Investigation of Serial Studies to Predict Your Therapeutic Response with Imaging and Molecular Analysis (I-SPY) trial tracked the changes in the tumor over multiple magnetic resonance imaging (MM) scans during the administration of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT). It has been noted that the phenotypic appearance (e.g., shape, margins) of a tumor correlated with the pathologic response to NACT. A more efficient and accurate interface for manipulating and presenting medical images would therefore have utility.


Known techniques for 3D viewing of medical images are described in U.S. Pat. No. 9,349,183, Method and Apparatus for Three Dimensional Viewing of Images, issued to Douglas, U.S. Pat. No. 8,384,771, Method and Apparatus for Three Dimensional Viewing of Images, issued to Douglas, Douglas, D. B., Petricoin, E. F., Liotta L., Wilson, E. D3D augmented reality imaging system: proof of concept in mammography. Med Devices (Auckl), 2016; 9:277-83, Douglas, D. B., Boone, J. M., Petricoin, E., Liotta, L., Wilson, E. Augmented Reality Imaging System: 3D Viewing of a Breast Cancer. J Nat Sci. 2016; 2(9), and Douglas, D. B., Wilke, C. A., Gibson, J. D., Boone, J. M., Wintermark, M. Augmented Reality: Advances in Diagnostic Imaging. Multimodal Technologies and Interaction, 2017; 1(4):29. In D3D imaging, the radiologist wears an augmented reality (AR), mixed reality (MR) or virtual reality (VR) headset and uses a joystick or gaming controller. Advantages include improved depth perception and human machine interface. Still, there are several challenges faced with this approach. First, an area of interest (e.g. tumor) may be in close proximity to structures that are similar in composition/density. Isolating the area of interest for better examination may be difficult. Second, many soft tissues in the body are mobile and deformable, so it can be difficult to achieve the best orientation to properly compare the tumor at multiple time points. Efficiently aligning the orientation to do so may be difficult. Third, certain portions of a tumor can respond to treatment and decrease in size while other portions of a tumor demonstrate increases in size. The pattern of tumor shrinkage has important prognostic implications. Furthermore, composition and complex morphologic features including spiculations (spikes extending from the surface), irregular margins and enhancement also have important implications. Consequently, there is a need for a system that facilitates recognition of the subtle, yet important changes in size, shape and margins. Fourth, a patient with metastatic cancer has several areas of interest in different areas of the body. It is difficult and time consuming to find each of the areas of interest at every time point to determine interval change. Consequently, there is a need for a system that enables the observer to do this efficiently.


SUMMARY

All examples, aspects and features mentioned in this document can be combined in any technically possible way.


In accordance with an aspect of the invention a method comprises: generating a three-dimensional cursor that has a non-zero volume; responsive to a first input, moving the three-dimensional cursor within a three-dimensional image; responsive to a second input, selecting a volume of the three-dimensional image designated by the three-dimensional cursor; and responsive to a third input, presenting a modified version of the selected volume of the three-dimensional image. In some implementations presenting the modified version of the selected volume of the three-dimensional image comprises removing an un-selected volume of the three-dimensional image from view. In some implementations presenting the modified version of the selected volume of the three-dimensional image comprises changing transparency of presented tissues within the selected volume. In some implementations presenting the modified version of the selected volume of the three-dimensional image comprises filtering a selected tissue to remove the selected tissue from view. In some implementations presenting the three-dimensional cursor with measurement markings on at least one edge, surface or side. In some implementations presenting the modified version of the selected volume of the three-dimensional image comprises presenting inputted location indicators. In some implementations presenting the modified version of the selected volume of the three-dimensional image comprises presenting inputted annotations. Some implementations comprise changing a size dimension of the three-dimensional cursor responsive to a fourth input. Some implementations comprise changing a geometric shape of the three-dimensional cursor responsive to a fifth input. Some implementations comprise automatically generating a statistical representation of the selected volume of the three-dimensional image. In some implementations presenting the modified version of the selected volume of the three-dimensional image comprises presenting at least one tissue type with false color. In some implementations presenting the modified version of the selected volume of the three-dimensional image comprises presenting volumetric changes over time with false color. Some implementations comprise presenting multiple computed tomography images associated with the selected volume using reference lines. Some implementations comprise presenting multiple axial computed tomography images associated with the selected volume using reference lines. Some implementations comprise presenting a maximum intensity projection (MIP) image of a positron emission tomography (PET) scan with the three-dimensional cursor overlaid thereon to indicate orientation and location of the selected volume. Some implementations comprise presenting a radiology report enhanced with information obtained using the three-dimensional cursor. Some implementations comprise automatically calculating and presenting a quantitative analysis and a qualitative analysis associated with multiple time points. Some implementations comprise presenting the modified version of the selected volume of the three-dimensional image comprises presenting inputted registration markers. Some implementations comprise automatically calculating volumetric change based on the registration markers. Some implementations comprise automatically re-orienting the selected volume of the three-dimensional image based on the registration markers. Some implementations comprise using multiple volumes selected with the three-dimensional cursor to designate a pre-operative planning pathway for guiding surgical intervention. Some implementations comprise presenting the selected volume with an augmented reality, virtual reality or mixed reality headset.


In accordance with an aspect of the invention an apparatus comprises: a computing device; and a human-machine interface comprising a three-dimensional cursor that has a non-zero volume; the human-machine interface moving the three-dimensional cursor within a three-dimensional image responsive to a first input; the human-machine interface selecting a volume of the three-dimensional image designated by the three-dimensional cursor responsive to a second input; and the human-machine interface presenting a modified version of the selected volume of the three-dimensional image responsive to a third input. In some implementations, the human-machine interface removes an un-selected volume of the three-dimensional image from view. In some implementations, the human-machine interface changes transparency of presented tissues within the selected volume. In some implementations, the human-machine interface filters a selected tissue to remove the selected tissue from view. In some implementations, the human-machine interface presents the three-dimensional cursor with measurement markings on at least one edge, surface or side. In some implementations, the human-machine interface receives and implements inputted location indicators. In some implementations, the human-machine interface receives and implements inputted annotations. In some implementations, the human-machine interface changes a size dimension of the three-dimensional cursor responsive to a fourth input. In some implementations, the human-machine interface changes a geometric shape of the three-dimensional cursor responsive to a fifth input. In some implementations, the human-machine interface automatically generates and presents a statistical representation of the selected volume of the three-dimensional image. In some implementations, the human-machine interface presents at least one tissue type with false color. In some implementations, the human-machine interface presents volumetric changes over time with false color. In some implementations, the human-machine interface presents multiple computed tomography images associated with the selected volume using reference lines. In some implementations, the human-machine interface presents multiple axial computed tomography images associated with the selected volume using reference lines. In some implementations, the human-machine interface presents a maximum intensity projection (MIP) image of a positron emission tomography (PET) scan with the three-dimensional cursor overlaid thereon to indicate orientation and location of the selected volume. In some implementations, the human-machine interface presents a radiology report enhanced with information obtained using the three-dimensional cursor. In some implementations, the human-machine interface automatically calculates and presents a quantitative analysis and a qualitative analysis associated with multiple time points. In some implementations, the human-machine interface presents inputted registration markers. In some implementations, the human-machine interface automatically calculates volumetric change after appropriate registration using the registration markers. In some implementations, the human-machine interface automatically re-orients the selected volume of the three-dimensional image based on the registration markers. In some implementations, the human-machine interface presents multiple volumes selected with the three-dimensional cursor to designate a pre-operative planning pathway for guiding surgical intervention. In some implementations, the human-machine interface presents the selected volume with an augmented reality, virtual reality or mixed reality headset.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE FIGURES


FIG. 1A illustrates a 3D cursor selecting a volume of interest from a three-dimensional medical image.



FIG. 1B illustrates the volume of interest selected with the 3D cursor;


unselected portions have been removed from view.



FIG. 1C illustrates modification of the transparency of the selected volume of interest.



FIG. 1D illustrates filtering of selected areas of the selected volume of interest.



FIG. 2 illustrates a variant of the 3D cursor of FIG. 1A with measurement markings on edges and sides.



FIG. 3 illustrates location indicators and annotations positioned relative to the portion of the image within the selected volume of interest.



FIGS. 4A, 4B, and 4C illustrate three different examples of geometric shapes of the 3D cursor of FIG. 1A.



FIG. 5 illustrates presentation of a quantitative analysis of tissues inside of the volume of interest selected with the 3D cursor of FIG. 1A.



FIG. 6 illustrates use of false color and transparency changes to enhance viewing of the selected volume of interest.



FIG. 7 illustrates association of multiple computed tomography (CT) images of the chest in lung windows with the interactive 3D cursor using reference lines.



FIG. 8 illustrates association of multiple axial computed tomography (CT) slices of the chest in lung windows with the interactive 3D cursor using reference lines.



FIG. 9 illustrates a maximum intensity projection (MIP) image of a fludeoxyglucose (18F) positron emission tomography (PET) scan in which two varying sized interactive 3D cursors are overlaid to indicate 3D cursor shape, size, orientation, and location when respective volumes of interest were selected.



FIG. 10 illustrates a radiology report enhanced with information obtained using the interactive 3D cursor and including quantitative and qualitative analysis.



FIG. 11 illustrates a radiology report enhanced with information obtained using the interactive 3D cursor, and including added quantitative and qualitative analysis at multiple time points.



FIGS. 12A, 12B and 12C illustrate a technique for correction for mis-registration at multiple time points using three or more markers.



FIG. 13 illustrates use of multiple interactive 3D cursors to select volumes of interest to designate a safe pre-operative planning pathway for guiding surgical intervention.



FIG. 14 illustrates use of the interactive 3D cursor in an educational setting.



FIG. 15 illustrates process steps on a radiologist's review of a patient's image with integration of the interactive 3D cursor.



FIG. 16 illustrates a system for use of the interactive 3D cursor.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION

Some aspects, features and implementations described herein may include machines such as computers, electronic components, radiological components, optical components, and processes such as computer-implemented steps. It will be apparent to those of ordinary skill in the art that the computer-implemented steps may be stored as computer-executable instructions on a non-transitory computer-readable medium. Furthermore, it will be understood by those of ordinary skill in the art that the computer-executable instructions may be executed on a variety of tangible processor devices. For ease of exposition, not every step, device or component that may be part of a computer or data storage system is described herein. Those of ordinary skill in the art will recognize such steps, devices and components in view of the teachings of the present disclosure and the knowledge generally available to those of ordinary skill in the art. The corresponding machines and processes are therefore enabled and within the scope of the disclosure.



FIG. 1A illustrates a 3D (three-dimensional) cursor 100 overlaid on a three-dimensional medical image 102. In the illustrated example, the 3D cursor 100 defines a cubic volume of interest. The medical image 102 could include any portion of a body, or an entire body, for example and without limitation. For purposes of explanation the medical image 102 includes different types of tissue. More specifically, the image includes a background material 104, such as fat, a lobulated mass 106, a tubular-shaped vein 108, and an artery 110. The 3D cursor 100 can be moved relative to the image, e.g. in three dimensions, such as by manipulating an IO device such as a 3D mouse, for example and without limitation. A button click or other input designates (selects) the portion of the image that is located inside the three-dimensional volume of the 3D cursor 100. Distinguishing between a 3D image portion selected by a 3D cursor and other unselected image portions is described in US 2016/0026266 and U.S. Pat. No. 8,384,771, both of which are incorporated by reference.



FIG. 1B illustrates the selected image portion of FIG. 1A. More particularly, unselected portions of the image located outside of an image portion 112 selected with the 3D cursor 100 have been filtered-out or otherwise completely removed from view. Consequently, the removed portions of the image do not obstruct or hinder the view of the selected image portion. Moreover, the selected image portion 112 can be manipulated and viewed as a separate and distinct image from the larger medical image 102 from which it was selected.



FIG. 1C illustrates modification of the transparency of the selected image portion 112. More specifically, transparency may be decreased and/or increased such that tissues and other features can be better observed, e.g. such that overlapping tissues and features are visible. For example, tissues and features located proximate to the back of the selected image portion such as lobulated mass 106 can be seen through overlapping tissues and features located proximate to the front of the selected image portion such as vein 108, when transparency is sufficiently increased. The transparency may be manipulated with the IO device to achieve various levels of transparency. Further, different levels of transparency may be applied to different portions of the selected image portion.



FIG. 1D illustrates filtering of selected areas or tissues of the selected image portion 112 to remove those areas or tissues from view. In the illustrated example the background material 104, vein 108, and an artery 110 have been removed from view, leaving only the lobulated mass 106. The tissues to be filtered (removed from view) may be selected based on geometric shape, color, brightness, density, and any other of a variety of available image data, either alone or in combination. Moreover, a designated volume defined by a geometric shape may be removed, e.g. a geometric shape that traverses tissue boundaries.


Transparency modification and tissue filtering facilitate presentation of certain tissue types of concern, both within the cursor and outside of the cursor. Currently, the medical professional must see through any tissue within the cursor but external to the tissue type of concern from the viewing point of the medical professional, thus degrading the visibility of the tissue of concern. The illustrated improvements enable the medical professional to change the transparency of any tissue within the cursor-defined volume but external to the tissue type of concern. Alternatively, tissue types not of concern are subtracted from the volume contained within the interactive 3D cursor, leaving only the tissue of concern in the presented image. Multiple interactive 3D cursors in combination can be used to obtain varying patterns of tissue subtraction. This helps to overcome the limitations of degraded visibility due to tissue within the cursor but external to the tissue type of concern from the viewing point of the medical professional.



FIG. 2 illustrates an implementation of the 3D cursor 100 with dimensional measurement markings. Dimensional measurement markings may be available as a feature that can be turned ON and OFF. In the illustrated example, the 3D cursor is a 2 cm by 2 cm by 2 cm cube. The dimensional measurement markings include tick marks 200, 202, and 204 that respectively designate 1 mm, 5 mm, and 1 cm increments along the edges of the cube (and thus representing three dimensions). Tick marks that represent different magnitudes may be uniquely represented to facilitate visual size determination of the lobulated mass 106 that represents the lesion of interest. 1 cm markings 206 are presented in each of two dimensions on each side of the cube.


The dimensional measurement markings can help serve as a reference for radiologist's activities to include visual assessment, orientation, comparisons with prior scans or measurements. Advantages may include mitigating the current lack of metrics are available to the medical professional to understand the size of the cursor and/or of the tissue elements contained within the cursor. This implementation places measurement metrics on each edge and side of the cursor to help enable the medical professional to rapidly understand the size of the subtended volume within the cursor. In the case where the cursor encapsulates a volume of concern such as a tumor, the three-dimensional size could be recorded in the medical professional report. This can help the visual assessment of each portion of the tumor to aid in the assessment of small changes in size of findings including lobulations of a mass's margin and spiculations.


Referring to FIG. 3, location indicators 300 and annotations 302 may be placed by the radiologist or by automated techniques to highlight locations or regions of concern within the interactive 3D cursor. The location indicators may specify a point or region within the volume of the 3D cursor. Annotations can be added manually by the radiologist or by automated techniques to describe areas that are of concern, e.g., growing, spiculation, irregular margin, indistinct margin, etc. If spiculations are on the surface of a tumor, this could be an indicator of potential malignancy. The location indicators, such as, but not limited to, arrow(s) pointing to key regions of interest within/outside the 3D cursor helps to overcome the limitation of the inability to mark key points within the cursor. This feature will be useful in discussions between medical professions regarding a patient's condition. It will also be useful in communicating imaging findings between a medical professional and a patient.


Referring to FIGS. 4A, 4B, and 4C, the 3D cursor may be may be implemented in a wide variety of different shapes. Examples include but are not limited to cube, cuboid, cylinder, sphere, ellipsoid, cone and tetrahedron. The shapes are not necessarily regular, and the lengths of edges may be resized, e.g. overall geometric shape scaling or changing individual edges, sides, or surfaces. For example, FIGS. 4A and 4B illustrate cuboid 3D cursors 400, 402 for which edge length has been set or selected based on the dimensions and orientation of the respective feature of interest 404, 406. FIG. 4C illustrates a spherical 3D cursor 408 for which the diameter may be set or selected based on the dimensions of the feature of interest 410. In addition to dimensional changes, cursor geometric shape may be changed.


The ability to change the size, shape, and individual dimensions of the 3D cursor enables the cursor to be customized based on the particular volume of interest to the medical professional. A fixed-shape, fixed-size cursor might be too large or too small, e.g. so as to include a significant amount of tissue not of interest. For example, in examining the lungs, placement of a cube-shaped cursor could cause ribs to be included in the image. Changing the shape of the 3D cursor would help to overcome this limitation. Customization could be accomplished by wide variety of techniques, possibly including but not limited to selecting an edge, side or vertex of the original 3D cursor with a second type of cursor 412, and then “clicking and dragging” the selected edge, side, or vertex in the desired direction to expand or reduce the volume of the original 3D cursor. The interface may also enable selection and change between multiple 3D geometric shapes, e.g. changing from cuboid to spherical. Scrolling on the conventional slices while simultaneously drawing shapes can also be performed to generate the prescribed 3D cursor volume. The interactive 3D cursor thus provides an efficient interface for tissue subtraction to provide enhanced visualization of the tumor.



FIG. 5 illustrates presentation of a quantitative analysis 500 of all tissues inside a volume selected with the 3D cursor. The illustrated example includes a bar graph but it is to be understood that any of a wide variety of charts, graphs, and other techniques for presentation of data might be implemented. Quantitative analysis can help the radiologist understand how a feature of interest such as tumor 502 (e.g., the lobulated mass 106, FIG. 1B) is changing in volume 504 over multiple time points. The interface may include a statistical representation of the tissue types, possibly including but not limited to a histogram bar chart to depict the volume (e.g., number of voxels per unit volume) of the different types of tissue within the cursor, distinct markings for different types of tissue such as, but not limited to, color coding the bars of the histogram bar chart.



FIG. 6 illustrates an implementation of the interactive 3D cursor 100 with false color and transparency to enhance viewing. False color and transparency may be dynamically adjusted and turned ON and OFF. Different false colors may be applied to different tissue types within the volume of the 3D cursor. The colors could be selected to correspond to the colors used in the statistical representation (FIG. 5). Alternatively, a respective unique false color could be selected for each different tissue type, or tissue types of particular interest or concern, and/or additional features of concern, e.g., irregular margin, indistinct margin, spiculation, etc. In the illustrated example, the background material 104 (fat) is depicted in light gray, the artery 110 is depicted in red, the vein 108 is depicted in blue, and the lobulated mass 106 is multicolored. Different colors may be selected or used to indicate stability of the lobulated mass 106 over time. For example, green may be used to indicate a stable volume 112 while orange is used to denote a slow growth volume 114, thereby providing a visual warning indicator. Red may be used to indicate high rate of growth or concerning margin volume 116. The extent of the volume of the lobulated mass can be determined automatically, e.g. based on density. Moreover, changes in volume of sub-regions of the lobulated mass may also be automatically determined, and color coding may be automatically implemented. This can help the radiologist understand how the mass is changing in volume over multiple time points.



FIG. 7 illustrates association of multiple computed tomography (CT) images of the chest in lung windows with the interactive 3D cursor 100 using reference lines 700. The illustrated example includes an axial image 702, a sagittal image 704, and a coronal image 706 of the chest in lung windows. An advantage is enhanced ability to cross reference the 3D cursor to the original 2D slices 702, 704, 706 from which total 3D volume was obtained. Medical professionals have experience and familiarity with 2D slices and may feel more confident in their findings given the capability to switch back and forth between the 2D and 3D volumetric approaches. A small display adjacent to the interactive 3D cursor could indicate which 2D slices contain tissue within in the interactive 3D cursor. Then the medical professional could direct the system to automatically select those slices which have tissue within the cursor and display them on a nearby 2D display unit. A corresponding visible boundary of the 3D cursor (e.g., red) projected on each of the slices may be presented.



FIG. 8 illustrates association of multiple axial computed tomography (CT) slices 800, 802, 804, 806 of the chest in lung windows with the interactive 3D cursor 100 using reference lines 808. The multiple axial computed tomography (CT) slices of the chest in lung windows show the location of the 3D cursor, i.e. the slice area that includes a cross-section of the 3D cursor, which in the illustrated example has selected a left upper lobe mass. Boundaries 810 of the 3D cursor in the slices are depicted in a color, e.g. red. Within the 3D cursor the lung cancer mass 106 is depicted in gray, surrounded by black that indicates non-cancerous lung tissue. This implementation helps the medical professional to rapidly visualize where the interactive 3D cursor is located relative to the slice images and the body. It also enables the medical professional to visualize the entire volumetric data with the interactive 3D cursor accurately positioned within the volume. Transparency of tissue within the 3D volume could be changed so that the interactive 3D cursor would stand out. This would help avoid left—right orientation mistakes that might occur during treatment. Multiple interactive 3D cursors which could be of differing sizes and/or shapes could be created and displayed.



FIG. 9 illustrates overlay of 3D cursors 100a, 100b on a maximum intensity projection (MIP) image 900 of a fludeoxyglucose (18F) positron emission tomography (PET) scan. Two different-sized interactive 3D cursors are used to highlight two separate areas of concern, including 3D cursor 100a for a right lung mass and cursor 100b for a vertebral body metastasis. This helps to automatically transfer data (e.g., picture of tissue within the cursor and statistical representations) from the viewing modality to the report of findings. Selection of key data through human machine interface such as, but limited to, a screen capture can be automatically transferred to the report of findings. This would provide quantitative results within the report together with qualitative impressions of the medical professional.



FIG. 10 illustrates a radiology report 1000 enhanced with information obtained from the interactive 3D cursor. Qualitative findings 1002 and quantitative findings 1004 may be included along with patient identifying information 1006, clinical history 1008, comparisons 1010, conclusions 1012, and recommendations 1014. Also included are a selected volume image 1016 and statistical graphic 1018. This helps to quantitatively track changes in volumes of concern (e.g., tumors) over time.



FIG. 11 illustrates a radiology report 1100 enhanced with information obtained from the interactive 3D cursor at multiple time points. Qualitative findings 1002 and quantitative findings 1004 may be included along with patient identifying information 1006, clinical history 1008, comparisons 1010, conclusions 1012, and recommendations 1014. Also included are selected volume images 1102, 1104 from different time points and respective statistical graphics 1106, 1108 from those time points. Follow up reports can include current and prior exams 1110, 1112 with quantitative analysis and qualitative analysis on how the lesion has changed over time. This may facilitate selection of a lesion (e.g., tumor) at multiple time points using an interactive 3D cursor; qualitative assessment of the lesion at multiple time points; and, quantitative assessment of the lesion at multiple time points. This would enable the medical professional to better assess how a particular lesion is changing over time. A report of current findings as outlined in the previous implementation could be placed in a report together with the data obtained from an earlier examination. This would enable tracking over time the progress of treatment or that of changes in tissues of interest/concern.



FIGS. 12A, 12B, and 12C illustrate a registration technique by which mis-registration can be corrected at multiple time points through the use of three or more markers 12, 14, 16. Initially, the mass 106 within each 3D cursor 100 image is noted using different locations within the interactive 3D cursor and different orientations. Next, the user marks similar locations on each image of the mass with registration markers. In the illustrated example, a yellow marker 12, a red marker 14, and a blue marker 16 correspond to the same respective parts of the mass on each scan. Finally, tissues within the interactive 3D cursor are aligned in accordance with markers. Many soft tissues within the body can change in orientation from one scan to the next due to patient movement. Corresponding mis-registration can limit the ability to properly track how a lesion changes over time. This technique provides a method to correct for such mis-registration. Three or more recognizable spots of the lesion (e.g., tumor) can be marked with a false color, arrow, or other registration mark. Then, these locations can be automatically aligned with one another. Shadows can be added to help bring out depth perception. Proper alignment will accurately align the shadows. This enhances visual assessment for how a lesion is changing over time to include changes in tumor composition, size and morphology.



FIG. 13 illustrates use of multiple image volumes selected with the 3D cursor to designate a safe pre-operative planning pathway to guide surgical intervention. In the illustrated example, multiple green interactive 3D cursors 1300 mark a surgeon-selected dissection pathway that is deemed safe in the pre-operative setting. The interactive 3D cursor 100 containing the cancerous lesion 106 is shown at a distal end of the planned surgical path represented by abutting or overlapping volumes selected with the 3D cursors 1300. The selected path that the surgeon will excise avoids the artery 110 with a minimum clearance of 10 mm. This provides the advantage of 3D depiction of possible surgical cuts. The path could include, but is not limited to, one or more of the following properties: a serpentine shape; measurements could subsequently be made to measure absolute distance between a point on the planned path to some region of concern (e.g., artery); the path could also be projected on a head mounted display at different intervals during the course of the operation. This feature would facilitate surgical planning as well as a potential to improve accuracy of the surgery.



FIG. 14 illustrates use of the interactive 3D cursor in an educational setting. Students 1400 are depicted wearing AR (augmented reality) headsets 1402 and an instructor 1404 is pointing to an abnormality on the board 1406. This facilitates presentation of medical information (e.g., anatomy) in a classroom environment. The interactive 3D cursor could be placed around the organ of interest and other parts of the body could be eliminated. Items from implementations discussed above such as metrics and arrows could be used. The students would be provided 3D head displays and joined into a display system so that they could see the tissue within the interactive 3D cursor. This would eliminate any confusion on the part of the students as to what specific detail in the imagery was being discussed.



FIG. 15 illustrates process steps on a radiologist's review of a patient's image with integration of the interactive 3D cursor into his/her practice. Step 1 is to create an interactive 3D cursor volume and shape that approximates the size and shape of patient organ/tissue corresponding to the item currently being inspected on the checklist. Step 2 is to position the interactive 3D cursor over the organ/tissue to be inspected. The interactive 3D cursor as it is located within the total 3D image volume may be presented on a display. Step 3 is to subtract from view all tissue external to the interactive 3D cursor. The interactive 3D cursor may be rotated to permit viewing from multiple angles. If interactive cursors are used at multiple time points to track how a particular lesion (e.g., tumor) changes over time, the 3D cursors can be rotated in synchrony with on another. Step 4 is to generate a statistical representation e.g., a histogram of tissue densities—color coded with the types of tissue that are suspicious. Step 5 is to subtract from view additional tissue within the interactive 3D cursor as deemed appropriate by the medical professional. Step 6 is to inspect the volume within the cursor and identify region(s) of interest and place indicators, annotations, and registration markers relative to region(s) of interest. Step 7 is to extract a statistical representation and capture imagery showing indicators, annotations, and registration markers and residual tissue within the interactive 3D cursor to be inserted into the medical professional's report. Step 8 is to use cross-referencing as described the above to confirm findings. Step 9 is to iterate on the other items on the checklist until finished. Step 10 is to prepare the report of the medical professional's findings. This procedure provides an opportunity to enhance medical image review process by medical professionals.



FIG. 16 illustrates a system for use of the interactive 3D cursor. A medical imaging device 1600 is connected to a computer workstation 1602. A wide variety of medical imaging devices and computer workstations could be used. Images are captured by the medical imaging device and sent to the computer workstation. The computer workstation includes non-volatile storage, computer-readable memory, processors, and a variety of other resources including but not limited to IO devices that provide a human-machine interface. In the illustrated example, the IO devices include a monitor 1604, keyboard 1606, 3D mouse 1608, and VR headset 1610. The IO devices are used to prompt a software program that runs on the computer workstation to perform the various process steps and implement the various features that have already been described above.


There are multiple potential advantages of the interactive 3D cursor. For example, there is reduction in time spent for classification of multiple lesions. The radiologist doesn't have to sort through many prior imaging studies to find the lesion and the interactive 3D cursor will save time. There is reduction in error when tracking multiple lesions, i.e. reducing the likelihood of mistakes when identifying different specific lesions that are nearby one another when comparing multiple scans. One possibility is to analyze the images obtained using the 3D cursor and using multiple uniquely tagged (e.g. numbered) cursors for any suspicious regions. The medical profession could then switch to slices for confirmation.


Several features, aspects, embodiments and implementations have been described. Nevertheless, it will be understood that a wide variety of modifications and combinations may be made without departing from the scope of the inventive concepts described herein. Accordingly, those modifications and combinations are within the scope of the following claims.

Claims
  • 1. A method comprising: providing a three-dimensional cursor that has a non-zero volume;selecting a volume of a three-dimensional image designated by the three-dimensional cursor, wherein the three-dimensional cursor encloses the volume of the three-dimensional image;presenting a modified version of the selected volume of the three-dimensional image; anddisplaying: orthogonal cross-sectional imaging slices, wherein the slices are marked with a corresponding visible boundary of the three-dimensional cursor, reference lines from the three-dimensional cursor to the orthogonal cross-sectional imaging slices, the three-dimensional cursor and results from a statistical analysis performed on the contents of the three-dimensional cursor.
  • 2. The method of claim 1, wherein presenting the modified version of the selected volume of the three-dimensional image comprises removing an un-selected volume of the three-dimensional image from view.
  • 3. The method of claim 1, wherein presenting the modified version of the selected volume of the three-dimensional image comprises changing transparency of presented tissues within or external to the selected volume.
  • 4. The method of claim 1, wherein presenting the modified version of the selected volume of the three-dimensional image comprises filtering a selected tissue to remove the selected tissue from view.
  • 5. The method of claim 1, further comprising presenting the three-dimensional cursor with measurement markings on at least one edge, surface or side.
  • 6. The method of claim 1, wherein presenting the modified version of the selected volume of the three-dimensional image comprises presenting inputted location indicators within the three-dimensional cursor.
  • 7. The method of claim 1, wherein presenting the modified version of the selected volume of the three-dimensional image comprises presenting inputted annotations.
  • 8. The method of claim 1, further comprising changing the volume inside of the three-dimensional cursor responsive to an additional input.
  • 9. The method of claim 8, further comprising changing a volumetric shape of the three-dimensional cursor responsive to a further input.
  • 10. The method of claim 1, further comprising automatically generating a statistical representation of the selected volume of the three-dimensional image.
  • 11. The method of claim 1, wherein presenting the modified version of the selected volume of the three-dimensional image comprises presenting at least one tissue type with false color based on a composition of a structure within the three-dimensional cursor.
  • 12. The method of claim 1, wherein presenting the modified version of the selected volume of the three-dimensional image comprises presenting volumetric changes over time in between at least two different radiological imaging examinations with false color.
  • 13. The method of claim 1, further comprising presenting a radiology report enhanced with statistical information obtained using the three-dimensional cursor.
  • 14. The method of claim 13, further comprising automatically calculating and presenting a quantitative analysis and a qualitative analysis associated with multiple time points in between at least two different radiological imaging examinations.
  • 15. The method of claim 1, further comprising presenting inputted registration markers on regions of interest within the volume contained within the three-dimensional cursor.
  • 16. The method of claim 15, further comprising automatically calculating volumetric change based on the registration markers.
  • 17. The method of claim 15, further comprising automatically re-orienting the selected volume of the three-dimensional image based on the registration markers.
  • 18. The method of claim 1, further comprising using multiple overlapping volumes selected with at least two three-dimensional cursors to designate a pre-operative planning pathway for guiding surgical intervention.
  • 19. The method of claim 1, further comprising presenting the modified version of the selected volume inside the three-dimensional cursor with an extended reality headset.
  • 20. The method of claim 1, wherein the selecting is responsive to a user input.
  • 21. The method of claim 1, wherein the presenting is responsive to a user input.
  • 22. The method of claim 1, wherein the selecting is automatic.
  • 23. The method of claim 1, wherein the presenting is automatic.
  • 24. A method comprising: providing a three-dimensional cursor that has a non-zero volume:selecting a volume of a three-dimensional image designated by the three-dimensional cursor, wherein the three-dimensional cursor encloses the volume of the three-dimensional image;presenting a modified version of the selected volume of the three-dimensional image; anddisplaying: a stack of contiguous cross-sectional imaging slices, wherein the slices are marked with a corresponding visible boundary of the three-dimensional cursor, reference lines from the three-dimensional cursor to the stack of contiguous cross-sectional imaging slices, the three-dimensional cursor and results from a statistical analysis performed on the contents of the three-dimensional cursor.
  • 25. The method of claim 24, wherein presenting the modified version of the selected volume of the three-dimensional image comprises removing an un-selected volume of the three-dimensional image from view.
  • 26. The method of claim 24, wherein presenting the modified version of the selected volume of the three-dimensional image comprises changing transparency of presented tissues within or external to the selected volume.
  • 27. The method of claim 24, wherein presenting the modified version of the selected volume of the three-dimensional image comprises filtering a selected tissue to remove the selected tissue from view.
  • 28. The method of claim 24, further comprising presenting the three-dimensional cursor with measurement markings on at least one edge, surface or side.
  • 29. The method of claim 24, wherein presenting the modified version of the selected volume of the three-dimensional image comprises presenting inputted location indicators within the three-dimensional cursor.
  • 30. The method of claim 24, wherein presenting the modified version of the selected volume of the three-dimensional image comprises presenting inputted annotations.
  • 31. The method of claim 24, further comprising changing the volume inside of the three-dimensional cursor responsive to an additional input.
  • 32. The method of claim 31, further comprising changing a volumetric shape of the three-dimensional cursor responsive to a further input.
  • 33. The method of claim 24, further comprising automatically generating a statistical representation of the selected volume of the three-dimensional image.
  • 34. The method of claim 24, wherein presenting the modified version of the selected volume of the three-dimensional image comprises presenting at least one tissue type with false color based on a composition of a structure within the three-dimensional cursor.
  • 35. The method of claim 24, wherein presenting the modified version of the selected volume of the three-dimensional image comprises presenting volumetric changes over time in between at least two different radiological imaging examinations with false color.
  • 36. The method of claim 24, further comprising presenting a radiology report enhanced with statistical information obtained using the three-dimensional cursor.
  • 37. The method of claim 36, further comprising automatically calculating and presenting a quantitative analysis and a qualitative analysis associated with multiple time points in between at least two different radiological imaging examinations.
  • 38. The method of claim 24, further comprising presenting inputted registration markers on regions of interest within the volume contained within the three-dimensional cursor.
  • 39. The method of claim 38, further comprising automatically calculating volumetric change based on the registration markers.
  • 40. The method of claim 38, further comprising automatically re-orienting the selected volume of the three-dimensional image based on the registration markers.
  • 41. The method of claim 24, further comprising using multiple overlapping volumes selected with at least two three-dimensional cursors to designate a pre-operative planning pathway for guiding surgical intervention.
  • 42. The method of claim 24, further comprising presenting the modified version of the selected volume inside the three-dimensional cursor with an extended reality headset.
  • 43. The method of claim 24, wherein the selecting is responsive to a user input.
  • 44. The method of claim 24, wherein the presenting is responsive to a user input.
  • 45. The method of claim 24, wherein the selecting is automatic.
  • 46. The method of claim 24, wherein the presenting is automatic.
  • 47. A method comprising: providing a three-dimensional cursor that has a non-zero volume;selecting a volume of a three-dimensional image designated by the three-dimensional cursor, wherein the three-dimensional cursor encloses the volume of the three-dimensional image;presenting a modified version of the selected volume of the three-dimensional image, anddisplaying: a maximum intensity projection (MIP) image with the three-dimensional cursor, reference lines from the three-dimensional cursor to the MIP image, the three-dimensional cursor and results from a statistical analysis performed on the contents of at least one three-dimensional cursor.
  • 48. The method of claim 47, wherein presenting the modified version of the selected volume of the three-dimensional image comprises removing an un-selected volume of the three-dimensional image from view.
  • 49. The method of claim 47, wherein presenting the modified version of the selected volume of the three-dimensional image comprises changing transparency of presented tissues within or external to the selected volume.
  • 50. The method of claim 47, wherein presenting the modified version of the selected volume of the three-dimensional image comprises filtering a selected tissue to remove the selected tissue from view.
  • 51. The method of claim 47, further comprising presenting the three-dimensional cursor with measurement markings on at least one edge, surface or side.
  • 52. The method of claim 47, wherein presenting the modified version of the selected volume of the three-dimensional image comprises presenting inputted location indicators within the three-dimensional cursor.
  • 53. The method of claim 47, wherein presenting the modified version of the selected volume of the three-dimensional image comprises presenting inputted annotations.
  • 54. The method of claim 47, further comprising changing the volume inside of the three-dimensional cursor responsive to an additional input.
  • 55. The method of claim 54, further comprising changing a volumetric shape of the three-dimensional cursor responsive to a further input.
  • 56. The method of claim 47, further comprising automatically generating a statistical representation of the selected volume of the three-dimensional image.
  • 57. The method of claim 47, wherein presenting the modified version of the selected volume of the three-dimensional image comprises presenting at least one tissue type with false color based on a composition of a structure within the three-dimensional cursor.
  • 58. The method of claim 47, wherein presenting the modified version of the selected volume of the three-dimensional image comprises presenting volumetric changes over time in between at least two different radiological imaging examinations with false color.
  • 59. The method of claim 47, further comprising presenting a radiology report enhanced with statistical information obtained using the three-dimensional cursor.
  • 60. The method of claim 59, further comprising automatically calculating and presenting a quantitative analysis and a qualitative analysis associated with multiple time points in between at least two different radiological imaging examinations.
  • 61. The method of claim 47, further comprising presenting inputted registration markers on regions of interest within the volume contained within the three-dimensional cursor.
  • 62. The method of claim 61, further comprising automatically calculating volumetric change based on the registration markers.
  • 63. The method of claim 61, further comprising automatically re-orienting the selected volume of the three-dimensional image based on the registration markers.
  • 64. The method of claim 47, further comprising using multiple overlapping volumes selected with at least two three-dimensional cursors to designate a pre-operative planning pathway for guiding surgical intervention.
  • 65. The method of claim 47, further comprising presenting the modified version of the selected volume inside the three-dimensional cursor with an extended reality headset.
  • 66. The method of claim 47, wherein the selecting is responsive to a user input.
  • 67. The method of claim 47, wherein the presenting is responsive to a user input.
  • 68. The method of claim 47, wherein the selecting is automatic.
  • 69. The method of claim 47, wherein the presenting is automatic.
  • 70. An apparatus comprising: a computing device; anda human-machine interface comprising a three-dimensional cursor that has a non-zero volume;the human-machine interface configured to select a volume of the three-dimensional image designated by the three-dimensional cursor, wherein the three-dimensional cursor encloses the volume of the three-dimensional image responsive to an input; andthe human-machine interface configured to present a modified version of the selected volume of the three-dimensional image responsive to another input,wherein the human-machine interface is further configured to display: orthogonal cross-sectional imaging slices, wherein the slices are marked with a corresponding visible boundary of the three-dimensional cursor, reference lines from the three-dimensional cursor to the orthogonal cross-sectional imaging slices, the three-dimensional cursor and results from a statistical analysis performed on contents of the three-dimensional cursor.
  • 71. The apparatus of claim 70, wherein the human-machine interface is configured to remove an un-selected volume of the three-dimensional image from view.
  • 72. The apparatus of claim 70, wherein the human-machine interface is configured to change transparency of presented tissues within the selected volume.
  • 73. The apparatus of claim 70, wherein the human-machine interface is configured to filter a selected tissue to remove the selected tissue from view.
  • 74. The apparatus of claim 70, wherein the human-machine interface is configured to present the three-dimensional cursor with measurement markings on at least one edge, surface or side.
  • 75. The apparatus of claim 70, wherein the human-machine interface is configured to receive and implement inputted location indicators within the three-dimensional cursor.
  • 76. The apparatus of claim 70, wherein the human-machine interface is configured to receive and implement inputted annotations.
  • 77. The apparatus of claim 70, wherein the human-machine interface is configured to change the volume inside of the three-dimensional cursor responsive to an additional input.
  • 78. The apparatus of claim 77, wherein the human-machine interface is configured to change a volumetric shape of the three-dimensional cursor responsive to a further input.
  • 79. The apparatus of claim 70, wherein the human-machine interface is configured to automatically generate and present a statistical representation of the selected volume of the three-dimensional image.
  • 80. The apparatus of claim 70, wherein the human-machine interface is configured to present at least one tissue type with false color based on then composition of a structure within the three-dimensional cursor.
  • 81. The apparatus of claim 70, wherein the human-machine interface is configured to present volumetric changes over time in between at least two different radiological imaging examinations with false color.
  • 82. The apparatus of claim 70, wherein the human-machine interface is configured to present a radiology report enhanced with statistical information obtained using the three-dimensional cursor.
  • 83. The apparatus of claim 70, wherein the human-machine interface is configured to automatically determine and present a quantitative analysis and a qualitative analysis associated with multiple time points in between at least two different radiological imaging examinations.
  • 84. The apparatus of claim 70, wherein the human-machine interface is configured to present inputted registration markers on regions of interest within the volume contained within the three-dimensional cursor.
  • 85. The apparatus of claim 84, wherein the human-machine interface is configured to automatically calculate volumetric change based on the registration markers.
  • 86. The apparatus of claim 84, wherein the human-machine interface is configured to automatically re-orient the selected volume of the three-dimensional image based on the registration markers.
  • 87. The apparatus of claim 70, wherein the human-machine interface is configured to present multiple overlapping volumes selected with at least two three-dimensional cursors to designate a pre-operative planning pathway for guiding surgical intervention.
  • 88. The apparatus of claim 70, wherein the human-machine interface is configured to present the modified version of the selected volume inside the three-dimensional cursor with an extended reality headset.
  • 89. An apparatus comprising: a computing device; anda human-machine interface comprising a three-dimensional cursor that has a non-zero volume;the human-machine interface configured to select a volume of the three-dimensional image designated by the three-dimensional cursor, wherein the three-dimensional cursor encloses the volume of the three-dimensional image responsive to an input; andthe human-machine interface configured to present a modified version of the selected volume of the three-dimensional image responsive to another input,wherein the human-machine interface is further configured to display; a stack of contiguous cross-sectional imaging slices, wherein the slices are marked with a corresponding visible boundary of the three-dimensional cursor, reference lines from the three-dimensional cursor to the stack of contiguous cross-sectional imaging slices, the three-dimensional cursor and results from a statistical analysis performed on contents of the three-dimensional cursor.
  • 90. The apparatus of claim 89, wherein the human-machine interface is configured to remove an un-selected volume of the three-dimensional image from view.
  • 91. The apparatus of claim 89, wherein the human-machine interface is configured to change transparency of presented tissues within the selected volume.
  • 92. The apparatus of claim 89, wherein the human-machine interface is configured to filter a selected tissue to remove the selected tissue from view.
  • 93. The apparatus of claim 89, wherein the human-machine interface is configured to present the three-dimensional cursor with measurement markings on at least one edge, surface or side.
  • 94. The apparatus of claim 89, wherein the human-machine interface is configured to receive and implement inputted location indicators within the three-dimensional cursor.
  • 95. The apparatus of claim 89, wherein the human-machine interface is configured to receive and implement inputted annotations.
  • 96. The apparatus of claim 89, wherein the human-machine interface is configured to change the volume inside of the three-dimensional cursor responsive to an additional input.
  • 97. The apparatus of claim 96, wherein the human-machine interface is configured to change a volumetric shape of the three-dimensional cursor responsive to a further input.
  • 98. The apparatus of claim 89, wherein the human-machine interface is configured to automatically generate and present a statistical representation of the selected volume of the three-dimensional image.
  • 99. The apparatus of claim 89, wherein the human-machine interface is configured to present at least one tissue type with false color based on a composition of a structure within the three-dimensional cursor.
  • 100. The apparatus of claim 89, wherein the human-machine interface is configured to present volumetric changes over time in between at least two different radiological imaging examinations with false color.
  • 101. The apparatus of claim 89, wherein the human-machine interface is configured to present a radiology report enhanced with statistical information obtained using the three-dimensional cursor.
  • 102. The apparatus of claim 89, wherein the human-machine interface is configured to automatically determine and present a quantitative analysis and a qualitative analysis associated with multiple time points in between at least two different radiological imaging examinations.
  • 103. The apparatus of claim 89, wherein the human-machine interface is configured to present inputted registration markers on regions of interest within the volume contained within the three-dimensional cursor.
  • 104. The apparatus of claim 103, wherein the human-machine interface is configured to automatically calculate volumetric change based on the registration markers.
  • 105. The apparatus of claim 103, wherein the human-machine interface is configured to automatically re-orient the selected volume of the three-dimensional image based on the registration markers.
  • 106. The apparatus of claim 89, wherein the human-machine interface is configured to present multiple overlapping volumes selected with at least two three-dimensional cursors to designate a pre-operative planning pathway for guiding surgical intervention.
  • 107. The apparatus of claim 89, wherein the human-machine interface is configured to present the modified version of the selected volume inside the three-dimensional cursor with an extended reality headset.
  • 108. An apparatus comprising: a computing device; anda human-machine interface comprising a three-dimensional cursor that has a non-zero volume;the human-machine interface configured to select a volume of the three-dimensional image designated by the three-dimensional cursor, wherein the three-dimensional cursor encloses the volume of the three-dimensional image responsive to an input; andthe human-machine interface configured to present a modified version of the selected volume of the three-dimensional image responsive to another input,wherein the human-machine interface is further configured to display: a maximum intensity projection (MIP) image with the three-dimensional cursor, reference lines from the three-dimensional cursor to the MIP image, the three-dimensional cursor and results from a statistical analysis performed on the contents of the three-dimensional cursor.
  • 109. The apparatus of claim 108, wherein the human-machine interface is configured to remove an un-selected volume of the three-dimensional image from view.
  • 110. The apparatus of claim 108, wherein the human-machine interface is configured to change transparency of presented tissues within the selected volume.
  • 111. The apparatus of claim 108, wherein the human-machine interface is configured to filter a selected tissue to remove the selected tissue from view.
  • 112. The apparatus of claim 108, wherein the human-machine interface is configured to present the three-dimensional cursor with measurement markings on at least one edge, surface or side.
  • 113. The apparatus of claim 108, wherein the human-machine interface is configured to receive and implement inputted location indicators within the three-dimensional cursor.
  • 114. The apparatus of claim 108, wherein the human-machine interface is configured to receive and implement inputted annotations.
  • 115. The apparatus of claim 108, wherein the human-machine interface is configured to change the volume inside of the three-dimensional cursor responsive to an additional input.
  • 116. The apparatus of claim 115, wherein the human-machine interface is configured to change a volumetric shape of the three-dimensional cursor responsive to a further input.
  • 117. The apparatus of claim 108, wherein the human-machine interface is configured to automatically generate and present a statistical representation of the selected volume of the three-dimensional image.
  • 118. The apparatus of claim 108, wherein the human-machine interface is configured to present at least one tissue type with false color based on a composition of a structure within the three-dimensional cursor.
  • 119. The apparatus of claim 108, wherein the human-machine interface is configured to present volumetric changes over time in between at least two different radiological imaging examinations with false color.
  • 120. The apparatus of claim 70, wherein the human-machine interface is configured to present a radiology report enhanced with statistical information obtained using the three-dimensional cursor.
  • 121. The apparatus of claim 108, wherein the human-machine interface is configured to automatically determine and present a quantitative analysis and a qualitative analysis associated with multiple time points in between at least two different radiological imaging examinations.
  • 122. The apparatus of claim 108, wherein the human-machine interface is configured to present inputted registration markers on regions of interest within the volume contained within the three-dimensional cursor.
  • 123. The apparatus of claim 122, wherein the human-machine interface is configured to automatically calculate volumetric change based on the registration markers.
  • 124. The apparatus of claim 122, wherein the human-machine interface is configured to automatically re-orient the selected volume of the three-dimensional image based on the registration markers.
  • 125. The apparatus of claim 108, wherein the human-machine interface is configured to present multiple overlapping volumes selected with at least two three-dimensional cursors to designate a pre-operative planning pathway for guiding surgical intervention.
  • 126. The apparatus of claim 108, wherein the human-machine interface is configured to present the modified version of the selected volume inside the three-dimensional cursor with an extended reality headset.
CROSS REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application is a Continuation-in-Part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/877,442, filed Oct. 7, 2015, now U.S. Pat. No. 9,980,691, which is a Continuation-in-Part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/176,569, filed Jul. 21, 2008, now U.S. Pat. No. 9,349,183, which is a Continuation-in-Part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/941,578, filed Nov. 16, 2007, now U.S. Pat. No. 8,384,771, which claims the benefit of and priority under 35 U.S.C. § 119(e) to U.S. Patent Application No. 60/877,931, filed Dec. 28, 2006, each of which are incorporated herein by reference in their entirety.

US Referenced Citations (202)
Number Name Date Kind
4472737 Iwasaki Sep 1984 A
4808979 DeHoff et al. Feb 1989 A
4952024 Gale Apr 1990 A
4987527 Hamada et al. Jan 1991 A
5049987 Hoppenstein Sep 1991 A
5200819 Nudelman et al. Apr 1993 A
5233458 Moffitt et al. Aug 1993 A
5278884 Eberhard et al. Jan 1994 A
5293529 Yoshimura et al. Mar 1994 A
5371778 Yanof Dec 1994 A
5402191 Dean et al. May 1995 A
5510832 Garcia Apr 1996 A
5621867 Murata et al. Apr 1997 A
5627582 Muramoto et al. May 1997 A
5659625 Marquardt Aug 1997 A
5682172 Travers et al. Oct 1997 A
5682437 Okino et al. Oct 1997 A
5696521 Robinson et al. Dec 1997 A
5708359 Gregory et al. Jan 1998 A
5841830 Barni et al. Nov 1998 A
5850352 Moezzi et al. Dec 1998 A
5867588 Marquardt Feb 1999 A
6002518 Faris Dec 1999 A
6034716 Whiting et al. Mar 2000 A
6052100 Soltan et al. Apr 2000 A
6057827 Matthews May 2000 A
6066095 Morsy et al. May 2000 A
6084937 Tam et al. Jul 2000 A
6100862 Sullivan Aug 2000 A
6108005 Starks et al. Aug 2000 A
6115449 Jang et al. Sep 2000 A
6124977 Takahashi Sep 2000 A
6130930 Tam Oct 2000 A
6225979 Taima et al. May 2001 B1
6272366 Vining Aug 2001 B1
6275561 Danielsson Aug 2001 B1
6276799 Van Saarloos et al. Aug 2001 B1
6342378 Zhang et al. Jan 2002 B1
6342878 Chevassus et al. Jan 2002 B1
6442417 Shahidi et al. Aug 2002 B1
6449309 Tabata Sep 2002 B1
6466185 Sullivan et al. Oct 2002 B2
6476607 Dannels et al. Nov 2002 B1
6487432 Slack Nov 2002 B2
6490335 Wang et al. Dec 2002 B1
6532008 Guralnick Mar 2003 B1
6545650 Yamada et al. Apr 2003 B1
6549803 Raghavan et al. Apr 2003 B1
6580448 Stuffier Jun 2003 B1
6676259 Trilllo Jan 2004 B1
6692441 Poland et al. Feb 2004 B1
6711231 Knoplioch et al. Mar 2004 B2
6734847 Baldeweg et al. May 2004 B1
6792071 Dewaele Sep 2004 B2
6862364 Berestov Mar 2005 B1
7020236 Shechter Mar 2006 B2
7058156 Bruder et al. Jun 2006 B2
RE39342 Starks et al. Oct 2006 E
7193626 Otani et al. Mar 2007 B2
7298372 Pfister et al. Nov 2007 B2
7324085 Balakrishnan et al. Jan 2008 B2
7524053 Lipton Apr 2009 B2
7604597 Murashita et al. Oct 2009 B2
7643025 Lange Jan 2010 B2
7647593 Matsumoto Jan 2010 B2
7654826 Faulkner et al. Feb 2010 B2
7773074 Arenson et al. Aug 2010 B2
7786990 Wegenkittl et al. Aug 2010 B2
7796790 McNutt et al. Sep 2010 B2
7808449 Neidrich et al. Oct 2010 B2
7822265 Berretty Oct 2010 B2
7840047 Böing et al. Nov 2010 B2
8078000 Böhm et al. Dec 2011 B2
8175683 Roose May 2012 B2
8228327 Hendrickson et al. Jul 2012 B2
8233103 MacNaughton et al. Jul 2012 B2
8363096 Aguirre Jan 2013 B1
8384771 Douglas Feb 2013 B1
8398541 DiMaio et al. Mar 2013 B2
8542326 MacNaughton et al. Sep 2013 B2
8567954 Koehler et al. Oct 2013 B2
D692941 Klinar et al. Nov 2013 S
8866883 Rohaly et al. Oct 2014 B2
9077982 Rha et al. Jul 2015 B2
9094676 Schutten et al. Jul 2015 B1
9338445 Atkins et al. May 2016 B2
9349183 Douglas et al. May 2016 B1
9473766 Douglas et al. Oct 2016 B2
9980691 Douglas et al. May 2018 B2
20020068863 Slack Jun 2002 A1
20020101658 Hoppenstein Aug 2002 A1
20020112237 Kelts Aug 2002 A1
20030026474 Yano Feb 2003 A1
20030107644 Choi Jun 2003 A1
20030194119 Manjeshwar et al. Oct 2003 A1
20030204364 Goodwin et al. Oct 2003 A1
20030218720 Morita et al. Nov 2003 A1
20040054248 Kimchy et al. Mar 2004 A1
20040070584 Pyo et al. Apr 2004 A1
20040204644 Tsougarakis et al. Oct 2004 A1
20040223636 Edic et al. Nov 2004 A1
20040246269 Serra et al. Dec 2004 A1
20040254454 Kockro Dec 2004 A1
20050017938 O'Donnell et al. Jan 2005 A1
20050030621 Takahashi et al. Feb 2005 A1
20050062684 Geng Mar 2005 A1
20050065423 Owen Mar 2005 A1
20050065424 Shah et al. Mar 2005 A1
20050096530 Daw et al. May 2005 A1
20050110791 Krishnamoorthy et al. May 2005 A1
20050148848 Guang et al. Jul 2005 A1
20050151152 Miller et al. Jul 2005 A1
20050152591 Kiraly et al. Jul 2005 A1
20050244050 Nomura et al. Nov 2005 A1
20050278408 Matsumoto Dec 2005 A1
20060013472 Kagitani Jan 2006 A1
20060026533 Napoli et al. Feb 2006 A1
20060033992 Solomon Feb 2006 A1
20060056680 Stutsman et al. Mar 2006 A1
20060058605 Deischinger et al. Mar 2006 A1
20060077204 Pfister et al. Apr 2006 A1
20060079755 Stazzone et al. Apr 2006 A1
20060120583 Dewaele Jun 2006 A1
20060171028 Oikawa et al. Aug 2006 A1
20060177133 Kee Aug 2006 A1
20060210111 Cleveland et al. Sep 2006 A1
20060210147 Sakaguchi Sep 2006 A1
20060227103 Koo et al. Oct 2006 A1
20060238441 Benjamin et al. Oct 2006 A1
20060239523 Stewart et al. Oct 2006 A1
20060268104 Cowan et al. Nov 2006 A1
20070035830 Matveev et al. Feb 2007 A1
20070058249 Hirose et al. Mar 2007 A1
20070085902 Walker et al. Apr 2007 A1
20070103459 Stoval, III et al. May 2007 A1
20070115204 Budz et al. May 2007 A1
20070116357 Dewaele May 2007 A1
20070118408 Mahesh et al. May 2007 A1
20070146325 Poston et al. Jun 2007 A1
20070147671 Di Vincenzo et al. Jun 2007 A1
20070165927 Muradyan et al. Jul 2007 A1
20070167801 Webler et al. Jul 2007 A1
20070188520 Finley et al. Aug 2007 A1
20070279435 Ng et al. Dec 2007 A1
20080025584 Kunz Jan 2008 A1
20080033240 Hoffman et al. Feb 2008 A1
20080037843 Fu et al. Feb 2008 A1
20080055305 Blank et al. Mar 2008 A1
20080062173 Tashiro Mar 2008 A1
20080100612 Dastmalchi et al. May 2008 A1
20080117233 Mather et al. May 2008 A1
20080267527 Berretty Oct 2008 A1
20080281182 Rabben et al. Nov 2008 A1
20090016491 Li Jan 2009 A1
20090034684 Bernard et al. Feb 2009 A1
20090051685 Takagi et al. Feb 2009 A1
20090080765 Bernard et al. Mar 2009 A1
20090219283 Hendrickson et al. Sep 2009 A1
20090231697 Marcus et al. Sep 2009 A1
20090232275 Spartiotis et al. Sep 2009 A1
20090304232 Tsukizawa Dec 2009 A1
20090324052 Nowinski Dec 2009 A1
20100194861 Hoppenstein Aug 2010 A1
20100201785 Lantin Aug 2010 A1
20100246911 Rabben et al. Sep 2010 A1
20110026808 Kim et al. Feb 2011 A1
20110107270 Wang et al. May 2011 A1
20110109620 Hong et al. May 2011 A1
20110194728 Kutcka et al. Aug 2011 A1
20110273543 Ushio et al. Nov 2011 A1
20120008734 Thomson et al. Jan 2012 A1
20120008735 Maurer et al. Jan 2012 A1
20120013711 Tamir et al. Jan 2012 A1
20120019636 Gefen et al. Jan 2012 A1
20120038631 Mayhew et al. Feb 2012 A1
20120056998 Kang et al. Mar 2012 A1
20120113235 Shintani May 2012 A1
20120120207 Shimazaki et al. May 2012 A1
20120127284 Bar-Zeev et al. May 2012 A1
20120162219 Kobayashi et al. Jun 2012 A1
20120190439 Nourbakhsh Jul 2012 A1
20120190967 Nahm Jul 2012 A1
20120206665 Sakai et al. Aug 2012 A1
20120215218 Lipani Aug 2012 A1
20120224755 Wu Sep 2012 A1
20120229595 Miller Sep 2012 A1
20120242569 Hamagishi Sep 2012 A1
20120269424 Ebata et al. Oct 2012 A1
20120287361 Sugihara Nov 2012 A1
20130003020 Koehler et al. Jan 2013 A1
20130057830 Tsai et al. Mar 2013 A1
20130141552 Kwon Jun 2013 A1
20130182085 Ziarati Jul 2013 A1
20130242063 Matsumoto Sep 2013 A1
20130245375 DiMaio Sep 2013 A1
20130278727 Tamir et al. Oct 2013 A1
20140065663 Vasquez et al. Mar 2014 A1
20140176685 Oikawa et al. Jun 2014 A1
20140253698 Evans et al. Sep 2014 A1
20140347726 Yang et al. Nov 2014 A1
20160026266 Douglas Jan 2016 A1
20160302895 Rohaly et al. Oct 2016 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (12)
Number Date Country
1885233 Dec 2006 CN
0571827 Dec 1993 EP
1791087 May 2007 EP
1843296 Oct 2007 EP
H11-232010 Aug 1999 JP
2002-330958 Nov 2002 JP
2008-220406 Sep 2008 JP
2009-000167 Jan 2009 JP
2009-018048 Jan 2009 JP
WO 9923586 May 1999 WO
WO 03100542 Dec 2003 WO
WO 2007063442 Jun 2007 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (52)
Entry
U.S. Appl. No 60/842,377, filed Sep. 6, 2006, Nowinski.
U.S. Appl. No. 60/854,872, filed Oct. 27, 2006, Dastmalchi et al.
Bakalash, Reuven et al. “Medicube: A 3D Medical Imaging Architecture” Computer &Graphics vol. 13, No. 2, pp. 151-157; 1989.
Douglas, David B. et al. “Augmented Reality Imaging System: 3D Viewing of a Breast Cancer” J Nat Sci, 2016;2(9).
Douglas, David B, et al. “Augmented Reality: Advances in Diagnostic Imaging: Multimodal Technologies and Interaction” 2017;1(4):29.
Douglas, David B. et al. “D3D Augmented Reality Imaging System: Proof of Concept in Mammography” Med Devices (Auckl), 2016; 9:277-83.
Engel, K., et al. “Combining Local and Remote Visualization Techniques for Interactive Volume Rendering in Medical Applications” Proceedings Visualization 2000. VIS 2000 (Cat. No. 00CH37145), Salt Lake City, UT, USA, 2000, pp. 449-452.
Erickson, Bradley J. “A Desktop Computer-Based Workstation for Display and Analysis of 3-and 4-Dimensional Biomedical Images” Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine, 30; pp. 97-110; 1989.
Goodsitt, Mitchel M. et al “Stereomammography: Evaluation of Depth Perception using a Virtual 3D Cursor” Med. Phys. 27 (6), Jun. 2000.
Haker, Steven et al. “Nondistorting Flattening Maps and the 3-D Visualization of Colon CT Images” IEEE Transactions of Medical Imaging; vol. 19, No. 7; Jul. 2000; 665-670.
Hinckley, Ken “Haptic Issues for Virtual Manipulation” A Dissertation Presented to the Faculty of the School of Engineering and Applied Science at the University of Virginia; Dec. 1996.
Hinckley, Ken, et al. “New Applications for the Touchscreen in 2D and 3D Medical Imaging Workstations” Proc. SPIE Medical Imaging '95; Image Display, SPIE vol. 2431, pp. 110-118.
Hui, Y.W. et al “3D Cursors for vol. Rendering Applications” EEE Conference on Nuclear Science Symposium and Medical Imaging, Orlando, FL, USA, 1992, pp. 1243-1245 vol. 2.
Hong, Lichan et al. “Reconstruction and Visualization of 3D Models of Colonic Surface” IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science, vol. 44, No. 3, Jun. 1997.
IBM “Fast Inspection of Contents of a Volume of 3D Data” IBM Technical Disclosure Bulletin; Feb. 1, 1994; vol. 37, Issue 2A.
Interrante, Victoria et al. “Strategies for Effectively Visualizing 3D Flow with Volume LIC” IEEE Visualization Conference; 1997; pp. 1-4.
Kapur, Ajay et al. “Combination of Digital Mammography with Semi-Automated 3D Breast Ultrasound” NIH Public Access; Author Manuscript; Technol Cancer Res Treat, 3(4); 325-334; Aug. 2004.
Kaufman, A., et a. “Real-Time Volume Rendering” International Journal of Imaging Systems and Technology, special issue on 3D Imaging; 2000.
Klein, GJ et al, “A 3D Navigational Environment for Specifying Positron Emission Tomography Volumes-of-Interest” 1995 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium and Medical Imaging Conference Record, San Francisco, CA, USA, 1995, pp. 1452-1455 vol. 3.
Kok, Arlan J.F. et al. “A Multimodal Virtual Reality Interface for 3D Interaction with VTK” Knowledge and Information Systems; 2007.
Kreeger, Kevin et al. “Interactive Volume Segmentation with the PAVLOV Architecture” Proceedings 1999 IEEE Parallel Visualization and Graphics Symposium (Cat. No. 99EX381), San Francisco, CA, USA, 1999, pp. 61-119.
Li, Yanhong et al. “Tinkerbell—A Tool for Interactive Segmentation of 3D Data” Journal of Structural Biology 120, 266-275; 1997.
Löbbert, Sebastian et al. “Visualisation of Two-Dimensional Volumes” 2004.
Loh, Yong Chong et al. “Surgical Planning System with Real-Time Volume Rendering” Proceedings International Workshop on Medical Imaging and Augmented Reality, Shatin, Hong Kong, China, 2001, pp. 259-261.
Martin, RW et al. “Stereographic Viewing of 3D Ultrasound Images: A Novelty or a Tool?” 1995 IEEE Ultrasonics Symposium; IEEE Press 1431-1434.
Peterson, Christine M. et al. “Volvulus of the Gastrointestinal Tract: Appearances at Multi-Modality Imaging” Radiographics; vol. 29, No. 5; Sep.-Oct. 2009; pp. 1281-1293.
Piekarski, Wayne “Interactive 3D Modelling in Outdoor Augmented Reality Worlds” Wearable Computer Lab, School of Computer and Information Science; The University of South Australia; Feb. 2004.
Robb, R.A., et al. “A Workstation for Interactive Display and Quantitative Analysis of 3-D and 4-D Biomedical Images” Biodynamics Research Unit, IEEE, 1986.
Robb, R.A. et al. “Interactive Display and Analysis of 3-D Medical Images” IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, vol. 8, No. 3, Sep. 1989.
Skoglund, T. et al. “3D Reconstruction of Biological Objects from Sequential Image Planes—Applied on Cerebral Cortex from CAT” Computerized Medical Imaging and Graphics; vol. 17, No. 3, pp. 165-174; 1993.
Steinicke, Frank et al. “Towards Applicable 3D User Interfaces for Everyday Working Environments” Conference Paper; Sep. 2007.
Subramanian, Sriram “Tangible Interfaces for Volume Navigation” CIP-Data Library Technische University Eindhoven; 2004.
Vanacken, Lode et al. “Exploring the Effects of Environment Density and Target Visibility on Object Selection in 3D Virtual Environments” IEEE Symposium on 3D User Interfaces 2007, Mar. 10-11.
Ware, Colin et al. “Selection Using a One-Eyed Cursor in a Fish Tank VR Environment” Faculty of Computer Science, University of New Brunswick; Apr. 20, 2000.
Wither, Jason et al. “Pictorial Depth Cues for Outdoor Augmented Reality” Ninth IEEE International Symposium on Wearable Computers (ISWC'05), Osaka, 2005, pp. 92-99.
Wong, Terence Z. et al. “Stereoscopically Guided Characterization of Three-Dimensional Dynamic MR Images of the Breast” Radiology, 1996; 198:288-291.
Yushkevich, Paul a et al. “User-Guided 3D Active Contour Segmentation of Anatomical Structures: Significantly Improved Efficiency and Reliability” Neurolmage 31; 1116-1128; 2006.
Zhai, Shumin et al. “The Partial Occlusion Effect: Utilizing Semi-Transparency in 3D Human Computer Interaction” ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, 3(3), 254-284; 1996.
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/941,578, dated Sep. 29, 2011.
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/941,578, dated Feb. 22, 2012.
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 11/941,578, dated Dec. 21, 2012.
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/176,569, dated Apr. 4, 2012.
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/176,569, dated Oct. 26, 2012.
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/176,569, dated Jul. 15, 2014.
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/176,569, dated Feb. 5, 2015.
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 12/176,569, dated May 29, 2015.
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 14/313,398 dated Sep. 25, 2015.
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 14/313,398 dated May 12, 2016.
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 14/313,398 dated Jul. 15, 2016.
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 14/877,442 dated Jul. 14, 2017.
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 14/877,442 dated Dec. 5, 2017.
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 14/877,442 dated Apr. 5. 2018.
Related Publications (2)
Number Date Country
20190227641 A1 Jul 2019 US
20200264709 A9 Aug 2020 US
Provisional Applications (1)
Number Date Country
60877931 Dec 2006 US
Continuation in Parts (3)
Number Date Country
Parent 14877442 Oct 2015 US
Child 15878463 US
Parent 12176569 Jul 2008 US
Child 14877442 US
Parent 11941578 Nov 2007 US
Child 12176569 US