Patent Grant
9854331
The subject matter of this patent document relates to management of multimedia content and more specifically using watermarks to facilitate recognition and utilization of multimedia content.
The use and presentation of multimedia content on a variety of mobile and fixed platforms have rapidly proliferated. By taking advantage of storage paradigms, such as cloud-based storage infrastructures, reduced form factor of media players, and high-speed wireless network capabilities, users can readily access and consume multimedia content regardless of the physical location of the users or the multimedia content. A multimedia content, such as an audiovisual content, often consists of a series of related images, which, when shown in succession, can impart an impression of motion, together with accompanying sounds, if any. Such a content can be accessed from various sources including local storage such as hard drives or optical disks, remote storage such as Internet sites or cable/satellite distribution servers, over-the-air broadcast channels, etc.
In some scenarios, such a multimedia content, or portions thereof, may contain only one type of content, including, but not limited to, a still image, a video sequence and an audio clip, while in other scenarios, the multimedia content, or portions thereof, may contain two or more types of content such as audiovisual content and a wide range of metadata. The metadata can, for example include one or more of the following: channel identification, program identification, content and content segment identification, content size, the date at which the content was produced or edited, the owner and producer identification of the content, timecode identification, copyright information, closed captions, and locations such as URLs where advertising content, software applications, interactive services content, and signaling that enables various services, and other relevant data that can be accessed. In general, metadata is the information about the content essence (e.g., audio and/or video content) and associated services (e.g., interactive services, targeted advertising insertion).
The metadata can enable content management, annotation, packaging, and search throughout content production and distribution value chain. Since the introduction of digital TVs, metadata has been introduced to enable digital interactive features and services. Various standardization efforts (such as MPEG-7, MPEG-21, TV-Anytime, DVB-SI, ATSC) strive to produce metadata standards with predefined data structures and transport methods for describing essence to support interoperability and unified services.
While such metadata may be useful in some applications, especially for enabling broadcast interactive services, they must be interleaved, prepended or appended to a multimedia content, which occupies additional bandwidth and, more importantly, can be lost when content is transformed into a different format (such as digital to analog conversion, transcoded into a different file format, etc.), processed (such as transcoding), and/or transmitted through a communication protocol/interface (such as HDMI, adaptive streaming).
The disclosed technology facilitates automatic recognition of a content, and enable acquisition of metadata associated with the content.
One aspect of the disclosed technology relates to a method for obtaining associated information for a multimedia content. The method includes receiving a content at a receiver device equipped with a watermark detector and performing watermark detection on the received content to extract a payload of one or more embedded watermarks. The payload includes a first field that includes a server identifier and a second field that includes an interval identifier associated with the server identifier. The first field provides a mapping to an Internet address accessible to retrieve metadata associated with content segments identified by the watermark payload. The method further includes, based on the detected watermark payload, forming a query and transmitting the query to a server identified by the Internet address, and receiving a response to the query from the server, the response including metadata associated with the content.
In one exemplary embodiment, the value of the first field is assigned by a central authority to domain registrants, and each domain registrant controls an assignment and usage of the second field. In another exemplary embodiment, a correspondence between the first field and the Internet addresses is pre-established at least in-part by a registrar server. In yet another exemplary embodiment, the mapping is stored in the receiver device in a memory. In another exemplary embodiment, the receiver device receives the mapping or the Internet address in response to a lookup request including the first field to a lookup server. In one exemplary embodiment, the query is a standardized query that is used to obtain the metadata corresponding to a particular value of the interval identifier. In still another exemplary embodiment, the payload includes a third field that is indicative of availability of the metadata associated with a content interval that is identified by the interval identifier. In yet another exemplary embodiment, the query is formed and transmitted to the server upon detection of a change in a value of the third field.
According to one exemplary embodiment, the payload is further structured to include a payload type field that identifies the payload as corresponding to one of a small domain, a medium domain or a large domain. In one particular embodiment, the payload is 50 bits long and the payload type field is a 2-bit field. In another particular embodiment, the payload that corresponds to a small domain includes a 30-bit first field, a 17-bit second, and a 1-bit interactive bit, the payload that corresponds to the medium domain includes a 22-bit first field, a 25-bit second field, and a 1-bit interactive bit, and the payload that corresponds to the large domain includes an 18-bit first field, a 29-bit second field, and a 1-bit interactive bit. In one exemplary embodiment, the interactive bit provides an indication as to whether or not an interactive content is available.
According to another embodiment, the first field specifies a server code, the second field specifies an interval code that is associated with a specific interval of the content, and each server code is assigned by a central authority to one of a content producer, a content distributor, or a service provider. In yet another embodiment, the metadata includes instructions that allows the receiver device to execute particular interactive services associated with a content interval that is identified by the interval identifier. In one particular embodiment, the metadata identifies one or more of the following: an Internet address of an interactive services server, or one or more parameters that indicate when and how an interactive service can be configured.
Another aspect of the disclosed embodiments relates to a device capable of receiving a multimedia content. The device includes a watermark detector implemented at least in-part using electronic circuitry to detect one of more watermarks from the received multimedia content. The detected watermarks include a payload that comprises a first field that includes a server identifier and a second field that includes an interval identifier associated with the server identifier. The first field provides a mapping to an Internet address accessible to retrieve metadata associated with content segments identified by the watermark payload. The device further includes a processor and a memory including processor executable instructions embodied thereupon. The instructions, upon execution, cause the processor to form a query. The device also includes a communication component implemented at least in-part using electronic circuity to transmit the query to a server identified by the Internet address, and to receive a response to the query from the server. The response includes metadata associated with the content.
In one exemplary embodiment, value of the first field is assigned by a central authority to domain registrants, and each domain registrant controls an assignment and usage of the second field. In another exemplary embodiment, a correspondence between the first field and the Internet addresses is pre-established at least in-part by a registrar server. In still another embodiment, the mapping is stored in the receiver device and is accessible for use by the receiver device for retrieving the Internet address based on the first field. In yet another embodiment, the communication component is configured to transmit a lookup request including the first field to a lookup server and to receive the mapping or the Internet address in response to the lookup request.
According to another exemplary embodiment, the instructions executed by the processor form a lookup query based on a value of the first field, and the communication component is configured to transmit the lookup request to a lookup server and to receive the Internet address. In this particular embodiment, the instructions executed by the processor further form the query as a standardized query based on the Internet address and a particular value of the interval identifier, and the communication component further is configured to transmit the standardized query to a server and to receive the metadata corresponding to the particular value of the interval identifier. In one exemplary embodiment, the instructions executed by the processor form the query upon detection of a change in a value of the third field.
In another exemplary embodiment associated with the above device, the payload includes a third field that is indicative of availability of the metadata associated with a content interval that is identified by the interval identifier. In still another embodiment, the payload is further structured to include a payload type field that identifies the payload as corresponding to one of a small domain, a medium domain or a large domain. In one specific implementation, the payload is 50 bits long and the payload type field is a 2-bit field. In another specific implementation, the payload corresponding to a small domain includes a 30-bit first field, a 17-bit second, and a 1-bit interactive bit, the payload corresponding to the medium domain includes a 22-bit first field, a 25-bit second field, and a 1-bit interactive bit, and the payload corresponding to the large domain includes an 18-bit first field, a 29-bit second field, and a 1-bit interactive bit. In still another embodiment, the interactive bit provides an indication as to whether or not an interactive content is available.
According to one exemplary embodiment associated with the above device, the first field specifies a server code, the second field specifies an interval code that is associated with a specific interval of the content, and each server code is assigned by a central authority to one of a content producer, a content distributor, or a service provider. In yet another embodiment, the instructions executed by the processor causes the processor to use the metadata to execute particular interactive services associated with a content interval that is identified by the interval identifier. In another exemplary embodiment, the metadata identifies one or more of the following: an Internet address of an interactive services server, or one or more parameters that indicate when and how an interactive service can be configured.
Another aspect of the disclosed technology relates to a computer program product embodied on one or more non-transitory computer readable media. The computer program product includes program code for receiving a content at a receiver device equipped with a watermark detector, and program code for performing watermark detection on the received content to extract a payload of one or more embedded watermarks. The payload includes a first field that includes a server identifier and a second field that includes an interval identifier associated with the server identifier. The first field provides a mapping to an Internet address accessible to retrieve metadata associated with content segments identified by the watermark payload. The computer program product further includes program code for, based on the detected watermark payload, forming a query and transmitting the query to a server identified by the Internet address, and program code for, receiving a response to the query from the server, the response including metadata associated with the content.
Another aspect of the disclosed technology relates to a device that includes a processor, and a memory including processer executable code. The processor executable code when executed by the processor configures the device to extract one or more watermarks that are embedded in a multimedia content, where the extracted watermarks include a payload that comprises a first field that includes a server identifier and a second field that includes an interval identifier associated with the server identifier. The first field provides a mapping to an Internet address accessible to retrieve metadata associated with content segments identified by the watermark payload. The processor executable code when executed by the processor further configures the device to form a query, transmit the query to a server identified by the Internet address, and receive a response to the query from the server, the response including metadata associated with the content.
In the following description, for purposes of explanation and not limitation, details and descriptions are set forth in order to provide a thorough understanding of the disclosed embodiments. However, it will be apparent to those skilled in the art that the present invention may be practiced in other embodiments that depart from these details and descriptions.
Additionally, in the subject description, the word “exemplary” is used to mean serving as an example, instance, or illustration. Any embodiment or design described herein as “exemplary” is not necessarily to be construed as preferred or advantageous over other embodiments or designs. Rather, use of the word exemplary is intended to present concepts in a concrete manner.
As noted earlier, typical techniques for incorporating metadata into multimedia content often rely on interleaving, prepending or appending the metadata fields or packets with the associated multimedia content. These techniques have proven to be unreliable under certain circumstances, such as when the multimedia content is transformed into a different format, which can cause the metadata to be lost. Notably, in some scenarios, an intervening device such as a set-top box issued by a multichannel video program distributor (MVPD) receives a multimedia content from a content source and provides the uncompressed multimedia content to a television set or another presentation device, which can result in the loss of various metadata and functionalities such as interactive applications that would otherwise accompany the multimedia content. Therefore alternative techniques for content identification can complement or replace metadata multiplexing techniques.
The disclosed embodiments enable automatic content recognition (ACR) using embedded watermarks. The watermarks can be embedded in the audio and/or video portions of a content and are substantially imperceptible to a viewer (or listener) of the content. The watermarks are also immune to various content processing operations and channel impairments, such as compression and decompression, cropping, scaling, transcoding, format conversion, noise addition, acoustic propagation, optical (e.g., free space) transmission, digital-to-analog (D/A) and analog-to-digital (A/D) conversions and the like. Once detected by a watermark detector (also sometimes referred to as a watermark extractor), the payload of the watermark can be used to identify the content, as well as the current temporal position (timing information) of the content being viewed, and recover the metadata associated with the identified content and temporal position to enable various operations, such as receiving an additional content, performing dynamic advertising insertion, or participating in an interactive opportunity. The viewing device (or an associated device) is connected to the Internet (or more generally, to a remote database) for the retrieval of the additional content, for participating in the interactive opportunities or other services.
The disclosed embodiments further comply with the requirements of the Advanced Television Systems Committee (ATSC), Inc., Call for Proposals For ATSC-3.0 AUTOMATIC CONTENT RECOGNITION WATERMARKING SOLUTIONS—ATSC Technology Group 3 (ATSC 3.0) (S33 Doc. 067r3). In particular, some embodiments provide for the embedding of watermarks using a watermark inserter into a content at a content source, that is subsequently transmitted to a MVPD, which provides the content to a set-top box (or similar device) at consumers' homes. The content that comes from the set-top box (typically via a HDMI interface) is presented on a viewing device (“Receiver”) that is compliant with ATSC 3.0 standard. The uncompressed audio/video at the viewing device includes embedded watermarks that enables the identification of the content and the current position of the content being viewed. The identified content and the current temporal position of the content are used to recover the metadata that enables the viewing device to receive additional contents, services or features associated with the presented content. It should be noted that while in some embodiments, a receiver (sometime also referred to as a receiver device) is a separate component than the set-top box, in other variations a receiver device may include, or be part of a larger device that includes, any one or combinations of additional components such as a set-top box a display, keyboard or other user interface devices, or a watermark detector, as well as processors (e.g., microprocessors, digital signal processors (DSPs), etc.) and other circuitry that may be needed for implementation of such device, or devices.
In some embodiments of the present application, the information conveyed by the embedded watermarks allows a viewing device to identify the channel currently being watched and recognize a channel change within a short period of time (e.g., 2 seconds). Further, the information conveyed by the embedded watermarks allows a viewing device to identify the content and the current position of the content being viewed, including short content such as interstitials. Information conveyed by the embedded watermarks also allows a viewing device to discover a remote location (for example a URL of a remote server) for accessing metadata information about the content and associated services. It allows a viewing device to identify the temporal position within the content being rendered, to a level of per sample or access unit accuracy. Additionally, the information conveyed by the embedded watermarks allows a viewing device to receive a time-sensitive event trigger in real time which may activate the viewing device to perform various operations such as requesting for the metadata from the remote location.
The methods, systems, devices and computer program products that are described in this document further enable centralized management of the high-level namespace associated with the watermarks and, at the same time, enable decentralized namespace lookup. The disclosed embodiments further allow key points of interoperability to be standardized to achieve independent management of watermarks within a namespace, as well as distributed and independent operation and management of related data services associated with individual broadcast content.
The watermark structure in some exemplary embodiments includes the following fields: a Domain ID and a Sequence ID. Each Domain ID is assigned by a central authority to a Domain Registrant who controls assignment and use of the Sequence ID codes under that domain. Each Domain ID maps one-to-one to an Internet domain name which is used to retrieve metadata associated with Sequence IDs in that domain. Clients use a lookup service to find the domain name associations. A standardized query is used to obtain metadata matching a Sequence ID from servers in the domain. Note that the domain name associated with a Domain ID that is registered with the Domain Registrar for use in the Domain Lookup Service may be the same domain name that is used to serve interactive services for broadcast content that has the associated Domain ID embedded in a watermark within it or it may be a different domain name from which is used to serve the associated interactive services. A Sequence ID can be used to identify a content and the current temporal position of the content being viewed within the domain specified by the Domain ID.
Example Watermark Payload:
According to an exemplary embodiment, a 50-bit payload is embedded in every 1.5 seconds of the content. In this exemplary embodiment, the watermark payload can be standardized with the following structure: [Payload Type:2] [Payload:48]. That is, the right-most 48 bits are designated to carry the payload and the 2 left-most bits are designated to carry the Payload Type. For example, the Payload Type values can be in the range 0 to 3, where a “0” designates a Reserved payload type, a “1” designate a Large Domain payload type, a “2” designates a Medium Domain payload type, and a “3” designates a Small Domain payload type. The payload type values can thus each describe the structure of the payload.
In some exemplary embodiments, the payload structure for each payload type is defined as follows:
The Domain field from any structure can be mapped into a unique Domain ID by prepending the Payload Type value to the Domain field and zero-padding (on the right) to 32 bits. For ASCII encoding, the Domain ID can be represented as an 8-character hexadecimal value. Domain field value of 0 can be reserved in all domains. The Sequence field from any structure can be mapped directly into a Sequence ID. For ASCII encoding, hexadecimal representation of the Sequence field (leading zeroes optional) can be utilized. Sequence IDs with decimal value of 1024 or less can be reserved for use as Control Codes. Control Codes are currently reserved.
The trigger bit, when set (e.g. to a value of “1”), informs the Receiver of an event that may activate the Receiver to perform various operations such as requesting metadata from the domain server. It indicates that further services or features, such as interactive content or advertising insertion associated with the Sequence ID should be available to the Receiver from the domain server associated with the payload's Domain ID. In some implementations the trigger field can include multiple bits. In some implementations, the trigger field may be used for other purposes. For example, a field can be defined as an “overwriteable” bit which indicates whether or not a preexisting watermark previously embedded by a content distributor or content producer can be replaced by another distributor (this is sometimes referred to as watermark “replacing”). In this case, a watermark embedder first checks for the presence of a watermark payload, and verifies the value of such ‘overwriteable’ bit if a payload is preset, and decides if a new watermark payload can be embedded to replace the pre-existing one according to the value of the bit. In another example, another field can be defined as an “over-watermarkable” bit which indicates whether or not a new watermark payload can be embedded in the content to co-exists with a pre-existing one so that both can be extracted (this is sometimes referred to as watermark “layering”). In some implementations, additional fields may be added into the watermark payload structure to support these two exemplary use cases. Because the “overwritable’ bit and/or “over-watermarkable” bit is associated with a content segment identified by a Sequence ID, each segment of a content may set these bits differently; thus, allowing some segments to be overwritable and/or over-watermarkable.
In another embodiment, authorization of overwriting watermarks or over-watermarking can be performed via a domain server. Such authorization may be associated with one or more Domain IDs and/or Sequence IDs. When a watermark embedder detects a pre-existing watermark payload, it sends the payload to a domain server according to the Domain ID of the payload, and receives a response indicating whether such payload can be replaced by a new payload or a new payload can be layered on top of the pre-existing one.
In some cases, a content distributor may want to check the services enabled by the pre-existing watermark payload before making a decision to replace the pre-existing payloads or layer new payloads in some or all content segments. The distributor can query the domain servers identified by the pre-existing payload for all relevant metadata identifying the services, inspect it, select metadata associated with some content segments, and post the selected metadata to the domain servers preferred by such distributor. The distributor can introduce new services associated with the pre-existing payloads. Alternatively, the distributor can also embed new payloads into some segments and associate new services with these segments enabled by the new payloads on the domain server. Furthermore, it is also possible for the distributor to embed new payloads in some segments on top of pre-existing payloads. Thus, both new payloads and pre-existing payloads can be detected and provided to a domain server, a receiver may receive multiple triggers identified by the new payload or the pre-existing payload associated with a segment. The receiver may choose the services caused by one of the triggers according to user preference or pre-configuration, or bring all services caused by multiple triggers to the user.
One of the services caused by triggers may be presentation of a secondary audiovisual content, typically delivered via Internet, such as pre-fetched advertisements. Such audiovisual content is treated as regular audiovisual content, i.e., it can also be watermarked and watermark-based triggers can be registered with a domain server. Thus, the watermark payloads in the secondary content can also trigger interactive services. This is sometimes called “nested triggers”.
In an alternative embodiment, the watermark embedder always overwrites existing watermarks, but keeps track of preexisting watermarks, and their relationship to newly embedded watermarks, and informs the domain server about it. This is particularly useful for live broadcasts, where examining the content for preexisting watermarks can go in parallel with watermark embedding/overwriting without causing any latency in the overwriting process. For example, the domain server can be informed that at the moment when the embedding of watermark with payload X has begun, the preexisting watermark with payload Y has been found, where the preexisting watermark begins T milliseconds before the newly embedded watermark. With this information, the domain server can later, when queried with payload X, calculate the timeline of preexisting watermarks, and provide the metadata about services in synchronization with timeline of the payload Y.
In yet another embodiment, multiple watermarks can be embedded into the same content using distinct watermark embedding parameters. For example, content producer may use one set of parameters for its watermark, but content distributor may have a distinct parameter set that produces watermarks that substantially do not interfere with detection of content producer watermarks. Alternatively, embedding of watermarks with distinct parameters may be used to increase watermark code space, or overall watermark data throughput. This way, sometimes referred to as watermark layering, multiple watermarks may be detected by a receiver, and the receiver may access domain servers associated with each of them and obtain multiple services.
Using the above watermark payload structures, if we assume that a watermark payload has temporal duration of 1.5 seconds, over 250,000 Large Domains can be identified (e.g. for long-term continuous embedding) that would allow 25.5 years of uniquely marked content per domain. This structure further allows over 4 Million Medium domains to be uniquely identified (e.g. for continuous marking of Olympics-scale events, annual channel assignments, or long-term selective embedding) that would allow 1.5 years of uniquely marked content per domain. The structure for Small Domains allows unique identification of over 1 Billion Small Domains (e.g. shows) with 54 hours of uniquely marked content per domain. Depending on the payload type, a domain may be assigned to one or more 1) broadcasters or content producers; 2) MVPDs; 3) channels; 4) sport events; 5) shows; 6) movies; or 7) episodes.
The watermark payload can undergo various coding, modulation and formatting operations before being embedded into a content. For example, the payload may be error correction code (ECC) encoded, scrambled, interleaved with other packets, appended with a synchronization or registration header, encrypted or channel coded to form a sequence of bits with particular characteristics. Often, a watermark payload is repeatedly embedded in multiple portions of the host content to improve the detection reliability of the embedded watermarks. Once embedded, the embedded content can be processed by a watermark extractor to recover the embedded watermark bits (or, more generally, symbols), and perform the reverse of the above coding, modulation or formatting schemes to recover the payload. In some instances, statistical techniques are used to recover the embedded symbols from the content using multiple instances of embedded watermarks.
The Domain Registrar in
Referring again to
Domain Lookup Server(s) maintain a copy of the Domain Registration database which maps each registered Domain ID to a domain name and keeps it current using the PUBLISH protocol with the Domain Registrar. Domain Lookup Server(s) also employ a standardized protocol (e.g., designated as LOOKUP in
Domain Servers are Internet servers that are accessible at the domain name associated with a registered Domain ID and can provide metadata to Receivers in response to queries triggered by watermark detections. In some implementations, queries employ a standardized message protocol (e.g., designated as QUERY in
Domain Management:
Domains are managed via coordinated interaction between a Domain Registrant and Domain Members (entities within a domain). Domain Management includes allocation of Sequence IDs within the domain to Domain Members, assignment of Sequence IDs to content segments, management of Sequence ID usage by watermark embedders, and/or distribution of metadata associated with Sequence IDs to Domain Servers. Standardization of protocols or processes for these functions may be valuable to obtain interoperability of professional systems, but is not essential for interoperability of devices. Domain Management may include analysis of the digital broadcast stream which contains both audiovisual broadcast content and multiplexed digital metadata to decode both watermarks and embedded digital metadata and automatically establish the association between watermark payloads present in the audio and video essence of the broadcast content and digital metadata present and associated with the same essence in the broadcast stream for population of the Domain Servers. Domain Management may also include functions and interfaces that allow broadcasters or content producers to edit the metadata extracted from the broadcast content or add new metadata for population of the Domain Servers.
The previously described watermark structure that comprises a domain identifier (Domain ID), a sequence identifier (Sequence ID) and a trigger field, can be used as an alternative method to deliver metadata (signaling) to receivers, and is of particular utility in scenarios where the receiver has access to the essence of the broadcast content (i.e. its audio and video) but not the complete digital broadcast stream which contains the metadata (signaling) in a multiplexed digital data stream. This may happen if the receiver obtains the broadcast content from an interface that does not include the portion of the multiplexed broadcast stream which includes the triggers, such as over an analog or HDMI interface. In such a scenario, the following exemplary sequence of operations can be implemented to allow a user to obtain the full set of features associated with the full broadcast content, as well as additional features that are enabled through the use of the disclosed technology. The exemplary sequence of operations is as follows. First, the name of a network server from which the metadata can be accessed (“domain name”) is identified. Next, the identified server is queried to obtain the associated metadata. In one exemplary embodiment, the process of retrieving a metadata can be accomplished by placing a set trigger bit in a particular watermark payload to cause receivers to imitate the trigger retrieval process.
According to one exemplary embodiment, the Sequence IDs in a Domain are dynamically allocated to Domain Members by a Domain Manager (which performs Domain Management functions). Moreover, the Embedders of a Domain Member may be deployed in multiple facilities in various locations. They are managed by and connected with a Domain Member Embedder Manager via Internet, an enterprise network, or another appropriate communication link. A block of Sequence IDs (which can include one or more continuous Sequence IDs) may initially be allocated for each Embedder. When an Embedder needs more Sequence IDs, it sends a request to its Domain Member Embedder Manager for a new block of Sequence IDs. Such a request may be sent prior to performing watermark embedding or when the number of remaining Sequence IDs reaches a predefined number. Similarly, a Domain Manager initially allocates one or more blocks of Sequence IDs to a Member Embedder Manager. When a Member Embedder Manager needs more Sequence IDs, it sends a request to its Domain Manager for a new Sequence IDs. Both the Domain Manager and Domain Member Embedder Manager ensure that each Embedder has adequate Sequence IDs. In addition to Sequence ID allocation, a Domain Member Embedder Manager can also configure each Embedder it manages, including the Domain ID of the watermark payload to be embedded by such Embedder and other embedding parameters. It also collects the embedding logs and metadata of watermarked content from the Embedders and reports them to a Domain Manager. A Domain Manager may use this data for registering the allocated Sequence IDs and associating Sequence IDs with content segments and associated metadata in the Domain Server as described earlier.
In one exemplary embodiment, a Domain can have more than one Domain Servers, each of which may serve a specific region and/or a Domain Member. In this case, the lookup services can be provided by a cluster of lookup servers in a hierarchical structure. For example, a Registrar level server first maps a Domain ID provided by a Receiver to a domain-level lookup server; and then such domain-level lookup server resolves the Domain ID to a specific Domain server.
Referring again to
Referring again to
In implementations that use the trigger bit, such a bit can support the use case where a broadcaster chooses to embed the watermark throughout its content (maybe for other applications; e.g. audience measurement, advertisement tracking, etc.) but only signals the availability of special content (e.g., ATSC-compatible interactive content) for certain portions of the content. In the absence of such trigger bit, millions of TV sets may attempt to query their server when there is no interactive content available. It should be noted that in some implementations the trigger bit is not needed. For example, when a receiver queries triggers from a domain server, it may request for a set of triggers for a particular duration of the content to reduce the query traffic.
The queried domain server responds to the Receiver's query by providing the stored metadata associated with the provided watermark payload information. The Receivers may then use the metadata received from the domain server to access, configure, and execute interactive services. Such metadata may include, but is not limited to, a broadcast channel identifier, an identifier that uniquely identifies the broadcast content and broadcast segment, a timecode, a trigger, an event or an action, supplement content, advertising content, or a server location (e.g., URL) where the above can be obtained. The Receivers should be resilient to an absent, delayed, or malformed response from a domain server.
The following provides an exemplary scenario in which the trigger field may be used to obtain metadata that enables additional features related to the content. In some implementations, where the timeline of a broadcast is broken into contiguous “segments” of content (e.g., show, ad, ad, promo, ad, show), for individual segments, metadata may be associated with particular moments on the segment timeline. The trigger field indicates whether or not such metadata is available. The metadata may contain instructions for how, when, or under what conditions a receiver should load and execute particular content or service, such as an interactive service associated for the segment. The metadata may identify an Internet server from which the interactive services can be loaded. The metadata may additionally identify a segment which is being displayed with which, e.g., the interactive services are associated. The metadata may additionally identify one or more parameters for when and how, e.g., the interactive service should be configured.
VP1 Watermark:
One specific example implementation of the disclosed technology is fully compatible with requirements set forth in the call for proposals (“CfP”) for ATSC-3.0 Automatic Content Recognition Watermarking Solutions. Such an implementation provides a flexible, decentralized and scalable Internet-based system architecture that employs a particular watermark, called VP1, in conjunction with a collection of standardized communication protocols and a lightweight administrative process that enable any connected ATSC Receiver to fully recover ATSC-3.0 broadcast stream metadata which has been lost over interfaces which do not carry the full broadcast stream. Such an architecture supports the server-based usage model outlined in the CfP, but also enables a more open, decentralized, and efficient architecture that obviates receiver manufacturers of the requirement to provide ACR services or contract metadata services, and enables this function to be provided by the same Content and Signaling Servers that support interactive services enabled in ATSC Receivers via direct access to the full ATSC broadcast stream. One function which must be centralized in this architecture, however, is a domain registrar (e.g., a Server Registrar), which runs a lightweight administrative process for assigning blocks of watermark codes to registrants and publishes a database of the registrations to service providers. (This function may be operated by ATSC or an administrative entity designated by it.) All other functions are open and decentralized and can be operated by broadcasters, receiver manufacturers, or third-party service providers. Such an architecture offers significant market and operational benefits by avoiding the need for any service provider to aggregate and publish metadata associated with multiple broadcast streams. Similarly, ATCS receiver manufacturers are not required to engage with a commercial service provider to aggregate and publish metadata associated with all broadcast streams.
The VP1 watermark and the associated system architecture are based upon the use of a 50-bit watermark data payload which has a 1.5 second duration in the marked content. A single detected watermark is sufficient to synchronize the receiver with the timecode of the embedded content with frame (e.g., millisecond) accuracy and recover any lost metadata and interactive services associated with the original broadcast stream. The VP1 watermark may be embedded continuously in content for subsequent detection such that:
(a) The audio quality is “near transparent” (i.e. a difference grade with a 95% confidence lower bound greater than −0.5) under the test conditions of ITU BS-1116-1 “Subjective Assessment of Small Audio Impairments;”
(b) The mean-time-to-first-detection of the payload is less than 3 seconds for broadcast content subjected to HE AAC v2 at 48 kbps;
(c) False detections (i.e., detected reported from unembedded content) and erroneous detections (i.e., detection of data payload different from what is embedded in the content) are reported by the detector with frequency not greater than once per 5 years of continuous detection; note that the data payload obtained in the case of a false or erroneous detection is considered to have a random value uniformly distributed across the range of defined codes. Since many possible code values will not be associated with broadcast content, the frequency of user-facing errors resulting from false or erroneous detections will be substantially less than the above (i.e., will be even further apart than 5 years).
(d) Embedding of the VP1 watermark requires not more than 20 mega instructions per second (MIPS) of processing per 48 kHz audio channel;
(e) Detection of the VP1 watermark requires not more than 10 MIPS of processing per multichannel audio program.
Additionally, VP1 watermark supports overwriting of watermarks and erasure of watermarks to enable any party in the content production or distribution chain to control all downstream watermark functionality. VP1 further supports the carriage of additional orthogonal watermark data channels (often referred to as “layers”) containing other data payloads for other applications.
The distributed system architecture associated with the VP1 watermark enables not only standardization of the watermark technology, but also includes a standardized code management scheme and three network protocols. An illustration of the architecture, which is compatible with the approach set forth in
Similar to the previously describes watermark payload structure, the VP1 watermark includes a watermark payload with three fields. These fields carry a Server Code, an Interval Code, and a Trigger. It should be noted that the fields of VP1 watermark payload structure conform to the previously described watermark structure, with Sever Code and Interval Code being analogous to the Domain ID and a Sequence ID. An exemplary VP1 watermark structure is shown in
The Server Registrant is responsible for coordinating the management of all Interval Codes associated with their assigned Server Code. Each Interval Code value can be associated uniquely with a specific interval of an instance of broadcast content. In some implementations, the interval is equal to the watermark duration (e.g., 1.5 seconds) but can be longer in circumstances where there is no need to enable a receiver to identify timing within the interval. We refer to the range of codes defined by an assigned Server Code and all associated Interval Codes as a Code Domain. The Trigger field of the VP1 watermark is a Boolean signal from the Content Source to the ATSC Receiver indicating that the ATSC Receiver should query for new interactive service content.
It should be noted that several components that are shown in
One or more Server Lookup Services are established. These services may be operated by ATSC, the Server Registrar, Content Owners, ATSC Receiver manufacturers, or a third party. Each Server Lookup Service maintains a database of all Server Code/Server Name associations published by the Server Registrar and responds to lookup requests from ATSC Receivers. The Server Lookup Services do not need to access or store any broadcast metadata; they simply provide ATSC Receivers with access to Server Names associated with Server Codes detected from broadcast watermarks.
A Content Source, acting either as a Server Registrant or in concert with a Server Registrant, associates a valid registered Server Code and one or more unique Interval Codes and maps them to intervals of broadcast content essence. The Content Source embeds those codes in the broadcast content using a Watermark Inserter prior to delivery of the broadcast content to an MVPD. The Interval Codes and the metadata for those same intervals of broadcast essence (e.g. any interactive content, signaling, metadata, triggers, channel identifier, media timeline timecode, etc.) are associated together in a database which is provided to a Content, Signaling, and Metadata Server (“CSM Server”). Content Sources may associate and embed watermarks continuously throughout their program material using sequentially increasing Interval Codes, may embed watermarks only in those intervals of content where interactive services are enabled, or may embed an Interval Code repeatedly through a program segment where an interactive service is available but does not require timing precision. Content Sources may register additional Code Domains in advance of depleting the Interval Code space associated with a given Server Code and may associate newly assigned Server Codes with the same Internet domain name to maintain infrastructure continuity.
The CSM Server responds to various requests from ATSC Receivers, including delivery of signaling and interactive content based on interactive service data received from a complete broadcast stream. The CSM Server also responds to code metadata queries, in which a query containing the watermark payload (e.g. in the ASCII representational format) is submitted by the WM Client in an ATSC Receiver, with a request for metadata associated with the interval of broadcast content. The metadata included in the CSM Server response may include channel identifiers, timecodes, content or segment identifiers, triggers, etc.; these are referred to as the “information to convey” in the CfP. It should be noted that while metadata services can be hosted in the same servers as the content and signaling services, they may alternatively be hosted on different servers from those used for content and signaling services.
ATSC Receivers may obtain broadcast content essence absent the full ATSC broadcast stream from an MVPD via a STB. The ATSC receiver may provide the content essence to the watermark client for detection of any embedded codes. As part of watermark client implementation in a given product, associations between Server Codes and Server Names can be stored in a cache (e.g., memory device), but it can also include the Internet address of a Server Lookup Service so that it may lookup newly registered or modified Server Names. The cache may be pre-populated at the time at ATSC Receiver manufacture to reduce traffic to Server Lookup Services.
When the watermark client detects a watermark payload embedded in the content it is playing, it checks to see whether or not the detected Server Code is present in its cache. If it is, the watermark client queries the CSM Server whose Server Name is associated with the Server Code to obtain the metadata associated with the detected watermark payload. If the Server Code from the detected watermark is not present in its cache, or if the contacted server fails to respond as expected, the watermark client may look up the current Server Name associated with the Server Code from the Server Lookup Service, cache the result, and then initiate a query directed at the newly identified Server Name.
Watermark clients may be configured to initiate a query only for certain watermark detections; e.g. the first one after playback begins, the first one after a channel change, only those with the Trigger field set if a query has not been performed within the past, e.g., 30 seconds, etc. Timecode metadata provided to watermark clients by the CSM Server can be used in conjunction with data recovered from the watermark detection process to determine the original media timecode of the broadcast content with frame or millisecond accuracy.
To enable the architecture that is depicted in
PUBLISH is a protocol whereby the Server Registrar notifies interested ecosystem participants of a newly established or updated mapping between a Server Code and an Internet domain name and publishes the association to Server Lookup Services.
LOOKUP is a protocol whereby an ATSC Receiver can submit a Server Code to a Server Lookup Service and receive a response containing the associated Server Name which has been most recently published by the Server Registrar.
QUERY is a protocol whereby an ATSC Receiver can submit a Server Code and Interval Code to a CSM Server and receive ATSC metadata (e.g. channel, timecode, interactive services triggers, etc.) associated with the specified interval of broadcast content.
The CfP further describes a scenario in its
As a very specific example, the code DB and the Content and Signaling Server can be populated by any automatic content recognition (ACR) service provider with access to the full broadcast stream for all broadcasters in a region. The ACR service provider can perform watermark detection and metadata recovery from the broadcast stream to populate their Code DB for use by the Content and Signaling Server. Since the watermark specification is open, the Content Source need not use a Watermark Inserter affiliated with any particular ACR service provider and any ACR service provider can recover the watermarks embedded by any broadcaster.
ATSC receivers within such a closed ecosystem need not employ the LOOKUP or QUERY protocols and can instead rely on the private protocols for accessing services within this private ecosystem created by the metadata server operator (e.g., by the ACR service provider). Such receivers can seamlessly coexist alongside other ATSC receivers that employ the standardized protocols and infrastructure that is described in the present application.
The following provides a detailed example of a code structure and payload encoding in accordance with certain embodiments of the present application. The representational structure that previously described in connection with
The Server Code is related to the Server Field for any of the three domain types by ((PT<<30)+SF), where <<30 is bit-wise left shift by 30 bits, PT is the Payload Type value and SF is the Server Field value.
Certain aspects of the disclosed embodiments can be implemented as a device that includes a processor, and a memory comprising processor executable code. The processor executable code, when executed by the processor, configures the device to perform any one of and/or all operations that are described in the present application.
One aspect of the disclosed embodiments relates to a system that includes a domain lookup server and a registrant server. The domain lookup server is configured to receive a lookup request from a receiver, where the request comprises a server code obtained from watermarks extracted from a multimedia content. The domain lookup server can receive a server name associated with the server code from a registrar server, and to further provide a response for transmission to the receiver. The domain lookup server's response includes the server name. The system's registrant server includes or is in communication with a metadata server that is populated with at least metadata associated with the multimedia content, and a processor implemented using electronic circuitry to receive, from the registrar server, the server code assigned to the registrant server, to assign one or more interval codes corresponding to one or more segments of the multimedia content, and to communicate information comprising each assigned interval code and associated metadata to the metadata server.
In one exemplary embodiment, the above system further includes a watermark inserter coupled to the registrant server. The watermark inserter is configured to receive the sever code, and the one or more interval codes the multimedia content, and to embed the server code and the one or more interval codes as watermarks into the multimedia content. In another exemplary embodiment, the system also is in communication with a content broadcaster that is coupled to the watermark inserter. The content broadcaster can receive the embedded multimedia content and can transmit the embedded multimedia content to the receiver. In some implementations, the system also includes the receiver, and a set-top-box (STB) coupled to the receiver. The STB is configured to receive the embedded multimedia content from the content broadcaster and to provide at least one component of the received embedded multimedia content to the receiver. In some exemplary implementations, the at least one component is an audio component of the multimedia content.
According to one exemplary embodiment, the above system further includes one or more additional content registrant servers, where each of the one or more additional registrant servers is coupled to the registrar server and to the metadata server. Each registrant server includes a corresponding processor implemented using electronic circuitry to receive, from the registrar server, a unique server code assigned to the corresponding registrant server. Further, each registrant server can assign one or more interval codes associated with the registrant server's unique server code and corresponding to one or more segments of the multimedia content. Each registrant server can further communicate information comprising the registrant server's assigned interval code(s) and associated metadata to the metadata server. In one exemplary implementation, the watermark inserter is coupled to at least one of the additional registrant servers to receive the server code and interval codes corresponding to the at least one of the additional registrant servers, and to embed the server code and interval codes corresponding to the at least one of the additional registrant servers as watermarks into the multimedia content.
In another exemplary embodiment, the watermark inserter is configured to insert the server code and interval codes corresponding to the at least one of the additional registrant servers as a different watermark layers into the multimedia content than the server code and interval codes of another registrant server. In yet another exemplary embodiment, the receiver is configured to detect the embedded watermarks from at least two watermarking layers to obtain at least two unique server codes, and to further transmit one or both of the unique server codes to the lookup server, and, in response, to receive, from the domain lookup server, server names associated with one or both of the unique server codes.
The components or modules that are described in connection with the disclosed embodiments can be implemented as hardware, software, or combinations thereof. For example, a hardware implementation can include discrete analog and/or digital components that are, for example, integrated as part of a printed circuit board. Alternatively, or additionally, the disclosed components or modules can be implemented as an Application Specific Integrated Circuit (ASIC) and/or as a Field Programmable Gate Array (FPGA) device. Some implementations may additionally or alternatively include a digital signal processor (DSP) that is a specialized microprocessor with an architecture optimized for the operational needs of digital signal processing associated with the disclosed functionalities of this application.
Various embodiments described herein are described in the general context of methods or processes, which may be implemented in one embodiment by a computer program product, embodied in a computer-readable medium, including computer-executable instructions, such as program code, executed by computers in networked environments. A computer-readable medium may include removable and non-removable storage devices including, but not limited to, Read Only Memory (ROM), Random Access Memory (RAM), compact discs (CDs), digital versatile discs (DVD), Blu-ray Discs, etc. Therefore, the computer-readable media described in the present application include non-transitory storage media. Generally, program modules may include routines, programs, objects, components, data structures, etc. that perform particular tasks or implement particular abstract data types. Computer-executable instructions, associated data structures, and program modules represent examples of program code for executing steps of the methods disclosed herein. The particular sequence of such executable instructions or associated data structures represents examples of corresponding acts for implementing the functions described in such steps or processes.
For example, one aspect of the disclosed embodiments relates to a computer program product that is embodied on a non-transitory computer readable medium. The computer program product includes program code for carrying out any one or and/or all of the operations of the disclosed embodiments.
The foregoing description of embodiments has been presented for purposes of illustration and description. The foregoing description is not intended to be exhaustive or to limit embodiments of the present invention to the precise form disclosed, and modifications and variations are possible in light of the above teachings or may be acquired from practice of various embodiments. The embodiments discussed herein were chosen and described in order to explain the principles and the nature of various embodiments and its practical application to enable one skilled in the art to utilize the present invention in various embodiments and with various modifications as are suited to the particular use contemplated. The features of the embodiments described herein may be combined in all possible combinations of methods, apparatus, modules, systems, and computer program products, as well as in different sequential orders. Any embodiment may further be combined with any other embodiment.
This application is a continuation of and claims priority to U.S. patent application Ser. No. 15/139,063, filed Apr. 26, 2016, which claims priority to U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/656,578, filed on Mar. 12, 2015, now U.S. Pat. No. 9,596,521, which claims priority to U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 61/952,840, filed on Mar. 13, 2014, and U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 61/953,668, filed on Mar. 14, 2014. The entire contents of the above noted applications are incorporated by reference as part of the disclosure of this document.
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 6122610 | Isabelle | Sep 2000 | A |
| 6145081 | Winograd et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
| 6175627 | Petrovic et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
| 6411725 | Rhoads et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
| 6427012 | Petrovic | Jul 2002 | B1 |
| 6430301 | Petrovic | Aug 2002 | B1 |
| 6490579 | Gao et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
| 6577747 | Kalker et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
| 6683958 | Petrovic | Jan 2004 | B2 |
| 6721439 | Levy et al. | Apr 2004 | B1 |
| 6792542 | Lee et al. | Sep 2004 | B1 |
| 6839673 | Choi et al. | Jan 2005 | B1 |
| 6888943 | Lam et al. | May 2005 | B1 |
| 6931536 | Hollar | Aug 2005 | B2 |
| 7024018 | Petrovic | Apr 2006 | B2 |
| 7140043 | Choi et al. | Nov 2006 | B2 |
| 7159118 | Petrovic | Jan 2007 | B2 |
| 7224819 | Levy et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
| 7343397 | Kochanski | Mar 2008 | B2 |
| 7460667 | Lee et al. | Dec 2008 | B2 |
| 7533266 | Bruekers et al. | May 2009 | B2 |
| 7548565 | Sull et al. | Jun 2009 | B2 |
| 7689532 | Levy | Mar 2010 | B1 |
| 7707422 | Shin et al. | Apr 2010 | B2 |
| 7774834 | Chauhan et al. | Aug 2010 | B1 |
| 7779271 | Langelaar | Aug 2010 | B2 |
| 7983922 | Neusinger et al. | Jul 2011 | B2 |
| 7986806 | Rhoads | Jul 2011 | B2 |
| 7991995 | Rabin et al. | Aug 2011 | B2 |
| 8005258 | Petrovic et al. | Aug 2011 | B2 |
| 8015410 | Pelly et al. | Sep 2011 | B2 |
| 8055013 | Levy et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
| 8059815 | Lofgren et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
| 8059858 | Brundage et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
| 8081757 | Voessing et al. | Dec 2011 | B2 |
| 8085935 | Petrovic | Dec 2011 | B2 |
| 8103049 | Petrovic et al. | Jan 2012 | B2 |
| 8138930 | Heath | Mar 2012 | B1 |
| 8151113 | Rhoads | Apr 2012 | B2 |
| 8181262 | Cooper et al. | May 2012 | B2 |
| 8189861 | Rucklidge | May 2012 | B1 |
| 8194803 | Baum et al. | Jun 2012 | B2 |
| 8249992 | Harkness et al. | Aug 2012 | B2 |
| 8259873 | Baum et al. | Sep 2012 | B2 |
| 8280103 | Petrovic et al. | Oct 2012 | B2 |
| 8301893 | Brundage | Oct 2012 | B2 |
| 8315835 | Tian et al. | Nov 2012 | B2 |
| 8321679 | Petrovic et al. | Nov 2012 | B2 |
| 8340348 | Petrovic et al. | Dec 2012 | B2 |
| 8346532 | Chakra et al. | Jan 2013 | B2 |
| 8346567 | Petrovic et al. | Jan 2013 | B2 |
| 8467717 | Croy et al. | Jun 2013 | B2 |
| 8479225 | Covell et al. | Jul 2013 | B2 |
| 8483136 | Yuk | Jul 2013 | B2 |
| 8533481 | Petrovic et al. | Sep 2013 | B2 |
| 8538066 | Petrovic et al. | Sep 2013 | B2 |
| 8560604 | Shribman et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
| 8588459 | Bloom et al. | Nov 2013 | B2 |
| 8589969 | Falcon | Nov 2013 | B2 |
| 8601504 | Stone et al. | Dec 2013 | B2 |
| 8615104 | Petrovic et al. | Dec 2013 | B2 |
| 8666528 | Harkness et al. | Mar 2014 | B2 |
| 8682026 | Petrovic et al. | Mar 2014 | B2 |
| 8726304 | Petrovic et al. | May 2014 | B2 |
| 8745403 | Petrovic | Jun 2014 | B2 |
| 8768714 | Blesser | Jul 2014 | B1 |
| 8781967 | Tehranchi et al. | Jul 2014 | B2 |
| 8791789 | Petrovic et al. | Jul 2014 | B2 |
| 8806517 | Petrovic et al. | Aug 2014 | B2 |
| 8811655 | Petrovic et al. | Aug 2014 | B2 |
| 8825518 | Levy | Sep 2014 | B2 |
| 8838977 | Winograd et al. | Sep 2014 | B2 |
| 8838978 | Winograd et al. | Sep 2014 | B2 |
| 8869222 | Winograd et al. | Oct 2014 | B2 |
| 8898720 | Eyer | Nov 2014 | B2 |
| 8923548 | Petrovic et al. | Dec 2014 | B2 |
| 8959202 | Haitsma et al. | Feb 2015 | B2 |
| 8990663 | Liu | Mar 2015 | B2 |
| 9009482 | Winograd | Apr 2015 | B2 |
| 9042598 | Ramaswamy et al. | May 2015 | B2 |
| 9055239 | Tehranchi et al. | Jun 2015 | B2 |
| 9106964 | Zhao | Aug 2015 | B2 |
| 9117270 | Wong et al. | Aug 2015 | B2 |
| 9147402 | Chen et al. | Sep 2015 | B2 |
| 9277183 | Eyer | Mar 2016 | B2 |
| 9596521 | Winograd et al. | Mar 2017 | B2 |
| 9602891 | Winograd et al. | Mar 2017 | B2 |
| 9607131 | Winograd et al. | Mar 2017 | B2 |
| 20020032864 | Rhoads et al. | Mar 2002 | A1 |
| 20020059622 | Grove et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
| 20020078233 | Biliris et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
| 20020138695 | Beardsley et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
| 20030012403 | Rhoads et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
| 20030084294 | Aoshima et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
| 20030193616 | Baker et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
| 20030228030 | Wendt | Dec 2003 | A1 |
| 20040039914 | Barr et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
| 20040098370 | Garland et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
| 20040101160 | Kunisa | May 2004 | A1 |
| 20040250080 | Levy et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
| 20050182792 | Israel et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
| 20060047704 | Gopalakrishnan | Mar 2006 | A1 |
| 20060053292 | Langelaar | Mar 2006 | A1 |
| 20060062426 | Levy et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
| 20060083242 | Pulkkinen | Apr 2006 | A1 |
| 20060115108 | Rodriguez et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
| 20060239501 | Petrovic et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
| 20070003103 | Lemma et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
| 20070039018 | Saslow et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
| 20070071037 | Abraham et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
| 20070135084 | Ido et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
| 20070250560 | Wein et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
| 20080037825 | Lofgren et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
| 20080263612 | Cooper | Oct 2008 | A1 |
| 20080297654 | Verberkt et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
| 20080301304 | Chitsaz | Dec 2008 | A1 |
| 20090060055 | Blanchard et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
| 20090089078 | Bursey | Apr 2009 | A1 |
| 20090158318 | Levy | Jun 2009 | A1 |
| 20090319639 | Gao et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
| 20100023489 | Miyata et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
| 20100054531 | Kogure et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
| 20100063978 | Lee et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
| 20100097494 | Gum et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
| 20100111355 | Petrovic et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
| 20100131461 | Prahlad et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
| 20100172540 | Davis et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
| 20100174608 | Harkness et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
| 20100281142 | Stoyanov | Nov 2010 | A1 |
| 20100325646 | Alhadeff et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
| 20110058188 | Guo et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
| 20110088075 | Eyer | Apr 2011 | A1 |
| 20110103444 | Baum et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
| 20110161086 | Rodriguez | Jun 2011 | A1 |
| 20110164784 | Grill et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
| 20110188700 | Kim et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
| 20110261667 | Ren et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
| 20110281574 | Patel et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
| 20110286625 | Petrovic et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
| 20110293090 | Ayaki et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
| 20110307545 | Bouazizi | Dec 2011 | A1 |
| 20110320627 | Landow et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
| 20120023595 | Speare et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
| 20120063635 | Matsushita et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
| 20120072731 | Winograd et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
| 20120102304 | Brave | Apr 2012 | A1 |
| 20120113230 | Jin | May 2012 | A1 |
| 20120117031 | Cha et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
| 20120122429 | Wood et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
| 20120129547 | Andrews, III et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
| 20120203556 | Villette et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
| 20120203734 | Spivack et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
| 20120216236 | Robinson et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
| 20120265735 | McMillan et al. | Oct 2012 | A1 |
| 20120272012 | Aronovich et al. | Oct 2012 | A1 |
| 20120272327 | Shin et al. | Oct 2012 | A1 |
| 20120300975 | Chalamala et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
| 20120304206 | Roberts et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
| 20120308071 | Ramsdell et al. | Dec 2012 | A1 |
| 20130007462 | Petrovic et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
| 20130024894 | Eyer | Jan 2013 | A1 |
| 20130031579 | Klappert | Jan 2013 | A1 |
| 20130060837 | Chakraborty et al. | Mar 2013 | A1 |
| 20130073065 | Chen et al. | Mar 2013 | A1 |
| 20130114848 | Petrovic et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
| 20130117571 | Petrovic et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
| 20130129303 | Lee et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
| 20130151855 | Petrovic et al. | Jun 2013 | A1 |
| 20130151856 | Petrovic et al. | Jun 2013 | A1 |
| 20130152210 | Petrovic et al. | Jun 2013 | A1 |
| 20130171926 | Distribeo | Jul 2013 | A1 |
| 20130188923 | Hartley et al. | Jul 2013 | A1 |
| 20130227293 | Leddy et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
| 20130271657 | Park et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
| 20140047475 | Oh et al. | Feb 2014 | A1 |
| 20140059116 | Oh et al. | Feb 2014 | A1 |
| 20140059591 | Terpstra et al. | Feb 2014 | A1 |
| 20140067950 | Winograd | Mar 2014 | A1 |
| 20140068686 | Oh et al. | Mar 2014 | A1 |
| 20140074855 | Zhao et al. | Mar 2014 | A1 |
| 20140075465 | Petrovic et al. | Mar 2014 | A1 |
| 20140075469 | Zhao | Mar 2014 | A1 |
| 20140114456 | Stavropoulos et al. | Apr 2014 | A1 |
| 20140115644 | Kim | Apr 2014 | A1 |
| 20140130087 | Cho et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
| 20140142958 | Sharma et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
| 20140149395 | Nakamura et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
| 20140196071 | Terpstra et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
| 20140219495 | Hua | Aug 2014 | A1 |
| 20140267907 | Downes et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
| 20140270337 | Zhao et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
| 20140279549 | Petrovic et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
| 20140325550 | Winograd et al. | Oct 2014 | A1 |
| 20140325673 | Petrovic | Oct 2014 | A1 |
| 20150030200 | Petrovic et al. | Jan 2015 | A1 |
| 20150043728 | Kim et al. | Feb 2015 | A1 |
| 20150043768 | Breebaart | Feb 2015 | A1 |
| 20150063659 | Poder et al. | Mar 2015 | A1 |
| 20150093016 | Jiang et al. | Apr 2015 | A1 |
| 20150121534 | Zhao et al. | Apr 2015 | A1 |
| 20150170661 | Srinivasan | Jun 2015 | A1 |
| 20150229979 | Wood et al. | Aug 2015 | A1 |
| 20150261753 | Winograd et al. | Sep 2015 | A1 |
| 20150264429 | Winograd et al. | Sep 2015 | A1 |
| 20150324947 | Winograd et al. | Nov 2015 | A1 |
| 20150340045 | Hardwick et al. | Nov 2015 | A1 |
| 20160037189 | Holden et al. | Feb 2016 | A1 |
| 20160055606 | Petrovic et al. | Feb 2016 | A1 |
| 20160055607 | Petrovic et al. | Feb 2016 | A1 |
| 20160057317 | Zhao | Feb 2016 | A1 |
| 20160148334 | Petrovic et al. | May 2016 | A1 |
| 20160150297 | Petrovic et al. | May 2016 | A1 |
| 20160182973 | Winograd | Jun 2016 | A1 |
| 20160241932 | Winograd et al. | Aug 2016 | A1 |
| Number | Date | Country |
|---|---|---|
| 1474924 | Nov 2004 | EP |
| 2439735 | Apr 2012 | EP |
| 2489181 | Aug 2012 | EP |
| 2899720 | Jul 2015 | EP |
| 2004163855 | Jun 2004 | JP |
| 2004173237 | Jun 2004 | JP |
| 2004193843 | Jul 2004 | JP |
| 2004194233 | Jul 2004 | JP |
| 2004328747 | Nov 2004 | JP |
| 2005051733 | Feb 2005 | JP |
| 2005094107 | Apr 2005 | JP |
| 2005525600 | Aug 2005 | JP |
| 20100272920 | Dec 2010 | JP |
| 1020080087047 | Sep 2008 | KR |
| 20100009384 | Jan 2010 | KR |
| 10201016712 | Feb 2011 | KR |
| 1020120083903 | Jul 2012 | KR |
| 1020120128149 | Nov 2012 | KR |
| 20130078663 | Jul 2013 | KR |
| 1020130074922 | Jul 2013 | KR |
| 101352917 | Jan 2014 | KR |
| 10201424049 | Jul 2014 | KR |
| WO 2000059148 | Oct 2000 | WO |
| WO 2005017827 | Feb 2005 | WO |
| WO 2005038778 | Apr 2005 | WO |
| WO 2006051043 | May 2006 | WO |
| WO 2008045880 | Apr 2008 | WO |
| WO 2009031082 | Mar 2009 | WO |
| WO 2010073236 | Jul 2010 | WO |
| WO 2010135687 | Nov 2010 | WO |
| WO 2011046590 | Apr 2011 | WO |
| WO 2011116309 | Sep 2011 | WO |
| WO 2012177126 | Dec 2012 | WO |
| WO 2012177874 | Dec 2012 | WO |
| WO 2013025035 | Feb 2013 | WO |
| WO 2013163921 | Nov 2013 | WO |
| WO 2014014252 | Jan 2014 | WO |
| WO 2015138798 | Sep 2015 | WO |
| WO 2015168697 | Nov 2015 | WO |
| WO 2015174086 | Nov 2015 | WO |
| WO 2016028934 | Feb 2016 | WO |
| WO 2016028936 | Feb 2016 | WO |
| WO 2016029055 | Feb 2016 | WO |
| WO 2016086047 | Jun 2016 | WO |
| Entry |
|---|
| “ATSC-3.0 Automatic Content Recognition Watermarking Solutions,” ATSC Technology Group, Advanced Television Systems Committee, Inc., Jan. 2014 (6 pages). |
| Aris Technologies, Inc. “Audio Watermarking System to Screen Digital Audio Content for LCM Acceptance,” May 1999 (17 pages). |
| Bangaleea, R., et al., “Performance improvement of spread spectrum spatial-domain watermarking scheme through diversity and attack characterisation,” IEEE Africon, pp. 293-298, 2002. |
| Extended European Search Report dated Sep. 21, 2017 for European Application No. 15762332.3 (9 pages). |
| Furon, T., “A constructive and unifying framework for zero-bit watermarking,” CS.MM, Jan. 12, 2007. |
| Hartung, F., et al., “Watermarking of MPEG-2 encoded video without decoding and re-coding,” Proc. SPIE Multimedia Computing and Networking 97, 3020:264-274, Feb. 1997. |
| Hartung, F., et al., “Watermarking of uncompressed and compressed video,” Signal Processing, 3(66):283-301, May 1998. |
| International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Apr. 12, 2016 for International Application No. PCT/US2015/066872, filed Dec. 18, 2015 (7 pages). |
| International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Aug. 13, 2015 for International Application No. PCT/US2015/029097, filed May 4, 2015 (14 pages). |
| International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Dec. 7, 2015 for International Application No. PCT/US2015/045960, filed Aug. 19, 2015 (14 pages). |
| International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Jan. 21, 2016 for International Application No. PCT/U52015/046166, filed Aug. 20, 2015 (8 pages). |
| International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Jan. 28, 2016 for International Application No. PCT/US2015/045964, filed Aug. 19, 2015 (8 pages). |
| International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Mar. 15, 2016 for International Application No. PCT/US2015/062514, filed Nov. 24, 2015 (10 pages). |
| International Search Report and Written Opinion dated May 28, 2015 for International Application No. PCT/US2015/020282, filed Mar. 12, 2015 (7 pages). |
| Kalker, T., et al., “System issues in digital image and video watermarking for copy protection,” Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. on Multimedia Computing and Systems, pp. 562-567, Jun. 1999. |
| Kirovski, D., et al., “Multimedia content screening using a dual watermarking and fingerprinting system,” Proceedings of the tenth ACM international conference, pp. 372-381, 2002. |
| Kirovski, D., et al., “Multimedia content screening using a dual watermarking and fingerprinting system,” Multimedia '02 Proceedings of the tenth ACM international conference on Multimedia, 2002 (11 pages). |
| Office Action dated Jul. 28, 2016 for Korean Patent Application No. 10-2016-7002289 (11 pages). |
| Office Action dated Jun. 10, 2016 for Korean Patent Application No. 10-2016-7002291 (19 pages). |
| Office action dated Nov. 30, 2016 for Korean Patent Application No. 10-2016-7002289 (4 pages). |
| Verance Corporation, “Confirmedia,” PowerPoint presentation made to National Association of Broadcasters, Apr. 24, 2001 (40 pages). |
| Zhao, J., “A WWW service to embed and prove digital copyright watermarks,” Proc. European Conf. on Multimedia Applications, Services and Techniques (ECMAST'96), May 1996 (15 pages). |
| Zhao, J., “Applying digital watermarking techniques to online multimedia commerce,” Proc. Int. Conf. on Imaging Science, Systems and Applications (CISSA'97), Jun./Jul. 1997 (7 pages). |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20170272839 A1 | Sep 2017 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 61952840 | Mar 2014 | US | |
| 61953668 | Mar 2014 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Parent | 15139063 | Apr 2016 | US |
| Child | 15615682 | US | |
| Parent | 14656578 | Mar 2015 | US |
| Child | 15139063 | US |
