Interactive input system and bezel therefor

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 8902193
  • Patent Number
    8,902,193
  • Date Filed
    Friday, May 9, 2008
    16 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, December 2, 2014
    9 years ago
Abstract
An interactive input system comprises a bezel at least partially surrounding a region of interest. The bezel has a plurality of bands thereon with at least some adjacent bands having different optical properties. At least one imaging device looks into the region of interest and sees the at least one bezel so that acquired images comprise regions corresponding to the bands. Processing structure processes pixels of a plurality of the regions to detect the existence of a pointer in the region of interest.
Description
FIELD OF THE INVENTION

The present invention relates to an interactive input system and to a bezel therefor.


BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

Interactive input systems that allow users to input ink into an application program using an active pointer (eg. a pointer that emits light, sound or other signal), a passive pointer (eg. a finger, cylinder or other object) or other suitable input device such as for example, a mouse or trackball, are well known. These interactive input systems include but are not limited to: touch systems comprising touch panels employing analog resistive or machine vision technology to register pointer input such as those disclosed in U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,448,263; 6,141,000; 6,337,681; 6,747,636; 6,803,906; 7,232,986; 7,236,162; and 7,274,356 and in U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2004/0179001 assigned to SMART Technologies ULC of Calgary, Alberta, Canada, assignee of the subject application, the contents of which are incorporated by reference; touch systems comprising touch panels employing electromagnetic, capacitive, acoustic or other technologies to register pointer input; tablet personal computers (PCs); laptop PCs; personal digital assistants (PDAs); and other similar devices.


Above-incorporated U.S. Pat. No. 6,803,906 to Morrison et al. discloses a touch system that employs machine vision to detect pointer interaction with a touch surface on which a computer-generated image is presented. A rectangular bezel or frame surrounds the touch surface and supports digital cameras at its corners. The digital cameras have overlapping fields of view that encompass and look generally across the touch surface. The digital cameras acquire images looking across the touch surface from different vantages and generate image data. Image data acquired by the digital cameras is processed by on-board digital signal processors to determine if a pointer exists in the captured image data. When it is determined that a pointer exists in the captured image data, the digital signal processors convey pointer characteristic data to a master controller, which in turn processes the pointer characteristic data to determine the location of the pointer in (x,y) coordinates relative to the touch surface using triangulation. The pointer coordinates are conveyed to a computer executing one or more application programs. The computer uses the pointer coordinates to update the computer-generated image that is presented on the touch surface. Pointer contacts on the touch surface can therefore be recorded as writing or drawing or used to control execution of application programs executed by the computer.


U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2004/0179001 to Morrison et al. discloses a touch system and method that differentiates between passive pointers used to contact a touch surface so that pointer position data generated in response to a pointer contact with the touch surface can be processed in accordance with the type of pointer used to contact the touch surface. The touch system comprises a touch surface to be contacted by a passive pointer and at least one imaging device having a field of view looking generally along the touch surface. At least one processor communicates with the at least one imaging device and analyzes images acquired by the at least one imaging device to determine the type of pointer used to contact the touch surface and the location on the touch surface where pointer contact is made. The determined type of pointer and the location on the touch surface where the pointer contact is made are used by a computer to control execution of an application program executed by the computer.


In order to determine the type of pointer used to contact the touch surface, in one embodiment a curve of growth method is employed to differentiate between different pointers. During this method, a horizontal intensity profile (HIP) is formed by calculating a sum along each row of pixels in each acquired image thereby to produce a one-dimensional profile having a number of points equal to the row dimension of the acquired image. A curve of growth is then generated from the HIP by forming the cumulative sum from the HIP.


Although passive touch systems provide some advantages over active touch systems and work extremely well, using both active and passive pointers in conjunction with a touch system provides more intuitive input modalities with a reduced number of processors and/or processor load.


Camera-based touch systems having multiple input modalities have been considered. For example, U.S. Pat. No. 7,202,860 to Ogawa discloses a camera-based coordinate input device allowing coordinate input using a pointer or finger. The coordinate input device comprises a pair of cameras positioned in the upper left and upper right corners of a display screen. The field of view of each camera extends to a diagonally opposite corner of the display screen in parallel with the display screen. Infrared emitting diodes are arranged close to the imaging lens of each camera and illuminate the surrounding area of the display screen. An outline frame is provided on three sides of the display screen. A narrow-width retro-reflection tape is arranged near the display screen on the outline frame. A non-reflective reflective black tape is attached to the outline frame along and in contact with the retro-reflection tape. The retro-reflection tape reflects the light from the infrared emitting diodes allowing the reflected light to be picked up as a strong white signal. When a user's finger is placed proximate to the display screen, the finger appears as a shadow over the image of the retro-reflection tape.


The video signals from the two cameras are fed to a control circuit, which detects the border between the white image of the retro-reflection tape and the outline frame. A horizontal line of pixels from the white image close to the border is selected. The horizontal line of pixels contains information related to a location where the user's finger is in contact with the display screen. The control circuit determines the coordinates of the touch position, and the coordinate value is then sent to a computer.


When a pen having a retro-reflective tip touches the display screen, the light reflected therefrom is strong enough to be registered as a white signal. The resulting image is not discriminated from the image of the retro-reflection tape. However, the resulting image is easily discriminated from the image of the black tape. In this case, a line of pixels from the black image close to the border of the outline frame is selected. Since the signal of the line of pixels contains information relating to the location where the pen is in contact with the display screen. The control circuit determines the coordinate value of the touch position of the pen and the coordinate value is then sent to the computer.


Although Ogawa is able to determine the difference between two passive pointers, the number of input modalities is limited to relatively few types of pointers such as pen and finger inputs. More pointers are capable using polarization techniques; however, these techniques require proper orientation when the pointer contacts the display screen in order to avoid confusion with other pointer modalities.


It is therefore an object of the present invention at least to provide a novel interactive input system and a novel bezel therefor.


SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

Accordingly, in one aspect there is provided an interactive input system comprising a bezel at least partially surrounding a region of interest, the bezel having a plurality of bands thereon with at least some adjacent bands having different optical properties, at least one imaging device looking into the region of interest and seeing the at least one bezel so that acquired images comprise regions corresponding to the bands, and processing structure processing pixels of a plurality of the regions to detect the existence of a pointer in the region of interest.


In one embodiment, the processing structure processes the pixels to detect discontinuities in the regions caused by the existence of the pointer. In one embodiment, the bands are generally horizontal and comprise at least one band that reflects illumination and at least one band that absorbs illumination. The band that reflects illumination may be a band of retro-reflective material.


In one embodiment, the bezel at least partially surrounds a generally planar surface. The generally planar surface may be a display surface.


According to another aspect there is provided an interactive input system comprising a bezel at least partially surrounding a region of interest, the bezel having a plurality of bands thereon with at least some adjacent bands having different optical properties, at least one imaging device looking into the region of interest and seeing the bezel, and processing structure communicating with the at least one imaging device and processing image data corresponding to a plurality of the bands to detect the existence of a pointer in the region of interest irrespective of pointer type.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

Embodiments will now be described more fully with reference to the accompanying drawings in which:



FIG. 1 is a perspective view of an interactive input system;



FIG. 2 is a block diagram view of the interactive input system of FIG. 1;



FIG. 3 is a block diagram of an imaging assembly forming part of the interactive input system of FIG. 1;



FIG. 4 is a front elevational view of a portion of a bezel segment forming part of the interactive input system of FIG. 1;



FIG. 5 is a block diagram of a digital signal processor forming part of the interactive input system of FIG. 1;



FIGS. 6
a to 6c are image frames captured by the imaging assembly of FIG. 3;



FIGS. 7
a to 7c show plots of normalized VIPdark, VIPretro and D(x) values calculated for the pixel columns of the image frames of FIGS. 6a to 6c;



FIG. 8 is a side elevational view of a pen tool used in conjunction with the interactive input system of FIG. 1;



FIG. 9 is partially exploded, side elevational view of the pen tool of FIG. 8;



FIG. 10 is a block diagram of the pen tool of FIG. 8;



FIG. 11 is an exploded perspective view of a tip assembly forming part of the pen tool of FIG. 8;



FIG. 12 is a cross-sectional view of the tip assembly of FIG. 11;



FIG. 13 is an exploded perspective view of a tip switch assembly forming part of the tip assembly of FIG. 12;



FIG. 14 is an exploded perspective view of an eraser assembly forming part of the pen tool of FIG. 8;



FIG. 15 is a side elevational view of an alternative pen tool for use in conjunction with the interactive input system of FIG. 1;



FIGS. 16
a and 16b are side elevational views of yet another pen tool for use in conjunction with the interactive input system of FIG. 1;



FIGS. 17
a and 17b are side elevational views of yet another pen tool for use in conjunction with the interactive input system of FIG. 1;



FIG. 18 is a side elevational view of still yet another pen tool for use in conjunction with the interactive input system of FIG. 1;



FIG. 19 shows a pop-up menu presented on a display surface of the interactive input system in response to interaction between a pen tool and the display surface; and



FIG. 20 shows a front elevational view of a portion of an alternative bezel segment.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE EMBODIMENTS

Turning now to FIGS. 1 and 2, an interactive input system that allows a user to input ink into an application program is shown and is generally identified by reference numeral 20. In this embodiment, interactive input system 20 comprises an assembly 22 that engages a display unit (not shown) such as for example, a plasma television, a liquid crystal display (LCD) device, a flat panel display device, a cathode ray tube etc. and surrounds the display surface 24 of the display unit. The assembly 22 employs machine vision to detect pointers brought into a region of interest in proximity with the display surface 24 and communicates with a digital signal processor (DSP) unit 26 via communication lines 28. The communication lines 28 may be embodied in a serial bus, a parallel bus, a universal serial bus (USB), an Ethernet connection or other suitable wired connection. The DSP unit 26 in turn communicates with a computer 30 executing one or more application programs via a USB cable 32. Alternatively, the DSP unit 26 may communicate with the computer 30 over another wired connection such as for example, a parallel bus, an RS-232 connection, an Ethernet connection etc. or may communicate with the computer 30 over a wireless connection using a suitable wireless protocol such as for example Bluetooth, WiFi, ZigBee, ANT, IEEE 802.15.4, Z-Wave etc. Computer 30 processes the output of the assembly 22 received via the DSP unit 26 and adjusts image data that is output to the display unit so that the image presented on the display surface 24 reflects pointer activity. In this manner, the assembly 22, DSP unit 26 and computer 30 form a closed loop allowing pointer activity proximate to the display surface 24 to be recorded as writing or drawing or used to control execution of one or more application programs executed by the computer 30.


Assembly 22 comprises a frame assembly that is mechanically attached to the display unit and surrounds the display surface 24. Frame assembly comprises a bezel having three bezel segments 40 to 44, four corner pieces 46 and a tool tray segment 48. Bezel segments 40 and 42 extend along opposite side edges of the display surface 24 while bezel segment 44 extends along the top edge of the display surface 24. The tool tray segment 48 extends along the bottom edge of the display surface 24 and supports one or more active pen tools P. The corner pieces 46 adjacent the top left and top right corners of the display surface 24 couple the bezel segments 40 and 42 to the bezel segment 44. The corner pieces 46 adjacent the bottom left and bottom right corners of the display surface 24 couple the bezel segments 40 and 42 to the tool tray segment 48. In this embodiment, the corner pieces 46 adjacent the bottom left and bottom right corners of the display surface 24 accommodate imaging assemblies 60 that look generally across the entire display surface 24 from different vantages. The bezel segments 40 to 44 are oriented so that their inwardly facing surfaces are seen by the imaging assemblies 60.


Turning now to FIG. 3, one of the imaging assemblies 60 is better illustrated. As can be seen, the imaging assembly 60 comprises an image sensor 70 such as that manufactured by Micron under model No. MT9V022 fitted with an 880 nm lens of the type manufactured by Boowon under model No. BW25B. The lens has an IR-pass/visible light blocking filter thereon (not shown) and provides the image sensor 70 with a 98 degree field of view so that the entire display surface 24 is seen by the image sensor 70. The image sensor 70 is connected to a connector 72 that receives one of the communication lines 28 via an I2C serial bus. The image sensor 70 is also connected to an electrically erasable programmable read only memory (EEPROM) 74 that stores image sensor calibration parameters as well as to a clock (CLK) receiver 76, a serializer 78 and a current control module 80. The clock receiver 76 and the serializer 78 are also connected to the connector 72. Current control module 80 is also connected to an infrared (IR) light source 82 comprising a plurality of IR light emitting diodes (LEDs) and associated lens assemblies as well as to a power supply 84 and the connector 72. Of course, those of skill in the art will appreciate that other types of suitable radiation sources to provide illumination to the region of interest may be used.


The clock receiver 76 and serializer 78 employ low voltage, differential signaling (LVDS) to enable high speed communications with the DSP unit 26 over inexpensive cabling. The clock receiver 76 receives timing information from the DSP unit 26 and provides clock signals to the image sensor 70 that determines the rate at which the image sensor 70 captures and outputs image frames. Each image frame output by the image sensor 70 is serialized by the serializer 78 and output to the DSP unit 26 via the connector 72 and communication lines 28.



FIG. 4 shows a portion of the inwardly facing surface 100 of one of the bezel segments 40 to 44. As can be seen, the inwardly facing surface 100 is divided into a plurality of generally horizontal strips or bands, each band of which has a different optical property. In this embodiment, the inwardly facing surface 100 of the bezel segment is divided into two (2) bands 102 and 104. The band 102 nearest the display surface 24 is formed of a retro-reflective material and the band 104 furthest from the display surface 24 is formed of an infrared (IR) radiation absorbing material. To take best advantage of the properties of the retro-reflective material, the bezel segments 40 to 44 are oriented so that their inwardly facing surfaces extend in a plane generally normal to that of the display surface 24.


Turning now to FIG. 5, the DSP unit 26 is better illustrated. As can be seen, DSP unit 26 comprises a controller 120 such as for example, a microprocessor, microcontroller, DSP etc. having a video port VP connected to connectors 122 and 124 via deserializers 126. The controller 120 is also connected to each connector 122, 124 via an I2C serial bus switch 128. I2C serial bus switch 128 is connected to clocks 130 and 132, each clock of which is connected to a respective one of the connectors 122, 124. The controller 120 communicates with an external antenna 136 via a wireless receiver 138, a USB connector 140 that receives USB cable 32 and memory 142 including volatile and non-volatile memory. The clocks 130 and 132 and deserializers 126 similarly employ low voltage, differential signaling (LVDS).


The interactive input system 20 is able to detect passive pointers such as for example, a user's finger, a cylinder or other suitable object as well as active pen tools P that are brought into proximity with the display surface 24 and within the fields of view of the imaging assemblies 60. For ease of discussion, the operation of the interactive input system 20, when a passive pointer is brought into proximity with the display surface 24, will firstly be described.


During operation, the controller 120 conditions the clocks 130 and 132 to output clock signals that are conveyed to the imaging assemblies 60 via the communication lines 28. The clock receiver 76 of each imaging assembly 60 uses the clock signals to set the frame rate of the associated image sensor 70. In this embodiment, the controller 120 generates clock signals so that the frame rate of each image sensor 70 is twice the desired image frame output rate. The controller 120 also signals the current control module 80 of each imaging assembly 60 over the I2C serial bus. In response, each current control module 80 connects the IR light source 82 to the power supply 84 and then disconnects the IR light source 82 from the power supply 84 so that each IR light source 82 turns on and off. The timing of the on/off IR light source switching is controlled so that for each pair of subsequent image frames captured by each image sensor 70, one image frame is captured when the IR light source 82 is on and one image frame is captured when the IR light source 82 is off.


When the IR light sources 82 are on, the LEDs of the IR light sources flood the region of interest over the display surface 24 with infrared illumination. Infrared illumination that impinges on the IR radiation absorbing bands 104 of the bezel segments 40 to 44 is not returned to the imaging assemblies 60. Infrared illumination that impinges on the retro-reflective bands 102 of the bezel segments 40 to 44 is returned to the imaging assemblies 60. The configuration of the LEDs of each IR light source 82 is selected so that the retro-reflective bands 102 are generally evenly illuminated over their entire lengths. Further specifics concerning the IR light sources 82 are described in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/118,552 to Hansen et al. entitled “Interactive Input System And Illumination Assembly Therefor” filed concurrently herewith and assigned to SMART Technologies ULC of Calgary, Alberta, the content of which is incorporated herein by reference. As a result, in the absence of a pointer, the image sensor 70 of each imaging assembly 60 sees a bright band 160 having a substantially even intensity over its length disposed between an upper dark band 162 corresponding to the IR radiation absorbing bands 104 and a lower dark band 164 corresponding to the display surface 24 as shown in FIG. 6a. When a pointer is brought into proximity with the display surface 24 and is sufficiently distant from the IR light sources 82, the pointer occludes infrared illumination reflected by the retro-reflective bands 102. As a result, the pointer appears as a dark region 166 that interrupts the bright band 160 in captured image frames as shown in FIG. 6b.


As mentioned above, each image frame output by the image sensor 70 of each imaging assembly 60 is conveyed to the DSP unit 26. When the DSP unit 26 receives image frames from the imaging assemblies 60, the controller 120 processes the image frames to detect the existence of a pointer therein and if a pointer exists, to determine the position of the pointer relative to the display surface 24 using triangulation. To reduce the effects unwanted light may have on pointer discrimination, the controller 120 measures the discontinuity of light within the image frames rather than the intensity of light within the image frames to detect the existence of a pointer. There are generally three sources of unwanted light, namely ambient light, light from the display unit and infrared illumination that is emitted by the IR light sources 82 and scattered off of objects proximate to the imaging assemblies 60. As will be appreciated, if a pointer is close to an imaging assembly 60, infrared illumination emitted by the associated IR light source 82 may illuminate the pointer directly resulting in the pointer being as bright as or brighter than the retro-reflective bands 102 in captured image frames. As a result, the pointer will not appear in the image frames as a dark region interrupting the bright band 160 but rather will appear as a bright region 168 that extends across the bright band 160 and the upper and lower dark bands 162 and 164 as shown in FIG. 6c.


The controller 120 processes successive image frames output by the image sensor 70 of each imaging assembly 60 in pairs. In particular, when one image frame is received, the controller 120 stores the image frame in a buffer. When the successive image frame is received, the controller 120 similarly stores the image frame in a buffer. With the successive image frames available, the controller 120 subtracts the two image frames to form a difference image frame. Provided the frame rates of the image sensors 70 are high enough, ambient light levels in successive image frames will typically not change significantly and as a result, ambient light is substantially cancelled out and does not appear in the difference image frame.


Once the difference image frame has been generated, the controller 120 processes the difference image frame and generates discontinuity values that represent the likelihood that a pointer exists in the difference image frame. When no pointer is in proximity with the display surface 24, the discontinuity values are high. When a pointer is in proximity with the display surface 24, some of the discontinuity values fall below a threshold value allowing the existence of the pointer in the difference image frame to be readily determined.


In order to generate the discontinuity values for each difference image frame, the controller 120 calculates a vertical intensity profile (VIPretro) for each pixel column of the difference image frame between bezel lines BretroT(x) and BretroB(x) that generally represent the top and bottom edges of the bright band 160 in the difference image and calculates a VIPdark for each pixel column of the difference image frame between bezel lines BdarkT(x) and BdarkB(x) that generally represent the top and bottom edges of the upper dark band 162 in the difference image. The bezel lines are determined via a bezel finding procedure performed during calibration at interactive input system start up, as will be described.


The VIPretro for each pixel column is calculated by summing the intensity values I of N pixels in that pixel column between the bezel lines BretroT(x) and BretroB(x). The value of N is determined to be the number of pixel rows between the bezel lines BretroT(x) and BretroB(x), which is equal to the width of the retro-reflective bands 102. If any of the bezel lines falls partway across a pixel of the difference image frame, then the intensity level contribution from that pixel is weighted proportionally to the amount of the pixel that falls inside the bezel lines BretroT(x) and BretroB(x). During VIPretro calculation for each pixel column, the location of the bezel lines BretroT(x) and BretroB(x) within that pixel column are broken down into integer components BiretroT(x), BiretroB(x), and fractional components BfretroT(x) and BiretroB(x) represented by:

BiretroT(x)=ceil[BretroT(x)]
BiretroB(x)=floor[BretroB(x)]
BfretroT(x)=BiretroT(x)—BretroT(x)
BfretroB(x)=BretroB(x,y)−BiretroB(x)


The VIPretro for the pixel column is then calculated by summing the intensity values I of the N pixels along the pixel column that are between the bezel lines BretroT(x) and BretroB(x) with the appropriate weighting at the edges according to: VIPretro(x)=(BfretroT(x)I(x, BiretroT(x)−1)+(BfretroB(x)I(x, BiretroB(x))+sum(I(x, BiretroT+j) where N=(BiretroB(x)−BiretroT(x)), j is in the range of 0 to N and I is the intensity at location x between the bezel lines.


The VIPdark for each pixel column is calculated by summing the intensity values I of K pixels in that pixel column between the bezel lines BdarkT(x) and BdarkB(x). The value of K is determined to be the number of pixel rows between the bezel lines BdarkT(x) and BdarkB(x), which is equal to the width of the IR radiation absorbing bands 104. If any of the bezel lines falls partway across a pixel of the difference image frame, then the intensity level contribution from that pixel is weighted proportionally to the amount of the pixel that falls inside the bezel lines BdarkT(x) and BdarkB(x). During VIPdark calculation for each pixel column, the location of the bezel lines BdarkT(x) and BdarkB(x) within that pixel column are broken down into integer components BidarkT(x), BidarkB(x), and fractional components BfdarkT(x) and BidarkB(x) represented by:

BidarkT(x)=ceil[BdarkT(x)]
BidarkB(x)=floor[BdarkB(x)]
BfdarkT(x)=BidarkT(x)−BdarkT(x)
BfdarkB(x)=BdarkB(x,y)−BidarkB(x)


The VIPdark for each pixel column is calculated in a similar manner by summing the intensity values I of the K pixels along the pixel column that are between the bezel lines BdarkT(x) and BdarkB(x) with the appropriate weighting at the edges according to:

VIPdark(x)=(BfdarkT(x)I(x, BidarkT(x)−1)+(BfdarkB(x)I(x, BidarkB(x))+sum(I(x, BidarkT+j)

where K=(BidarkB(x)−BidarkT(x)) and j is in the range of 0 to N.


The VIPs are subsequently normalized by dividing them by the corresponding number of pixel rows (N for the retro-reflective regions, and K for the dark regions). The discontinuity value D(x) for each pixel column is then calculated by determining the difference between VIPretro and VIPdark according to:

D(x)=VIPretro(x)−VIPdark(x)



FIG. 7
a shows plots of the normalized VIPdark, VIPretro and D(x) values calculated for the pixel columns of the image frame of FIG. 6a. As will be appreciated, in this image frame no pointer exists and thus, the discontinuity values D(x) remain high for all of the pixel columns of the image frame. FIG. 7b shows plots of the normalized VIPdark, VIPretro and D(x) values calculated for the pixel columns of the image frame of FIG. 6b. As can be seen, the D(x) curve drops to low values at a region corresponding to the location of the pointer in the image frame. FIG. 7c shows plots of the normalized VIPdark, VIPretro and D(x) values calculated for the pixel columns of the image frame of FIG. 6c. As can be seen, the D(x) curve also drops to low values at a region corresponding to the location of the pointer in the image frame.


Once the discontinuity values D(x) for the pixel columns of each difference image frame have been determined, the resultant D(x) curve for each difference image frame is examined to determine if the D(x) curve falls below a threshold value signifying the existence of a pointer and if so, to detect left and right edges in the D(x) curve that represent opposite sides of a pointer. In particular, in order to locate left and right edges in each difference image frame, the first derivative of the D(x) curve is computed to form a gradient curve ∇D(x). If the D(x) curve drops below the threshold value signifying the existence of a pointer, the resultant gradient curve ∇D(x) will include a region bounded by a negative peak and a positive peak representing the edges formed by the dip in the D(x) curve. In order to detect the peaks and hence the boundaries of the region, the gradient curve ∇D(x) is subjected to an edge detector.


In particular, a threshold T is first applied to the gradient curve ∇D(x) so that, for each position x, if the absolute value of the gradient curve ∇D(x) is less than the threshold, that value of the gradient curve ∇D(x) is set to zero as expressed by:

D(x)=0, if |∇D(x)|<T


Following the thresholding procedure, the thresholded gradient curve ∇D(x) contains a negative spike and a positive spike corresponding to the left edge and the right edge representing the opposite sides of the pointer, and is zero elsewhere. The left and right edges, respectively, are then detected from the two non-zero spikes of the thresholded gradient curve ∇D(x). To calculate the left edge, the centroid distance CDleft is calculated from the left spike of the thresholded gradient curve ∇D(x) starting from the pixel column Xleft according to:







CD
left

=




i




(


x
i

-

X
left


)





D


(

x
i

)








i





D


(

x
i

)










where xi is the pixel column number of the i-th pixel column in the left spike of the gradient curve ∇D(x), i is iterated from 1 to the width of the left spike of the thresholded gradient curve ∇D(x) and Xleft is the pixel column associated with a value along the gradient curve ∇D(x) whose value differs from zero (0) by a threshold value determined empirically based on system noise. The left edge in the thresholded gradient curve ∇D(x) is then determined to be equal to Xleft+CDleft.


To calculate the right edge, the centroid distance CDright is calculated from the right spike of the thresholded gradient curve ∇D(x) starting from the pixel column Xright according to:







CD
right

=




j




(


x
i

-

X
right


)





D


(

x
j

)








j





D


(

x
j

)










where xj is the pixel column number of the j-th pixel column in the right spike of the thresholded gradient curve ∇D(x), j is iterated from 1 to the width of the right spike of the thresholded gradient curve ∇V D(x) and Xright is the pixel column associated with a value along the gradient curve ∇D(x) whose value differs from zero (0) by a threshold value determined empirically based on system noise. The right edge in the thresholded gradient curve is then determined to be equal to Xright+CDright.


Once the left and right edges of the thresholded gradient curve ∇D(x) are calculated, the midpoint between the identified left and right edges is then calculated thereby to determine the location of the pointer in the difference image frame.


After the location of the pointer in each difference frame has been determined, the controller 120 uses the pointer positions in the difference image frames to calculate the position of the pointer in (x,y) coordinates relative to the display surface 24 using triangulation in a manner similar to that described in above incorporated U.S. Pat. No. 6,803,906 to Morrison et al. The calculated pointer coordinate is then conveyed by the controller 120 to the computer 30 via the USB cable 32. The computer 30 in turn processes the received pointer coordinate and updates the image output provided to the display unit, if required, so that the image presented on the display surface 24 reflects the pointer activity. In this manner, pointer interaction with the display surface 24 can be recorded as writing or drawing or used to control execution of one or more application programs running on the computer 30.


During the bezel finding procedure performed at interactive input system start up, a calibration procedure is performed for each image sensor to determine the bezel lines BretroT(x), BretroB(x), BdarkT(x) and BdarkB(x). During each calibration procedure, a calibration image pair is captured by the associated image sensor 70. One calibration image of the pair is captured while the IR light source 82 associated with the image sensor is on and the other calibration image of the pair is captured while the IR light source 82 associated with the image sensor is off. The two calibration images are then subtracted to form a calibration difference image thereby to remove ambient lighting artifacts. The pixel rows of interest of the calibration difference image (i.e. the pixel rows forming the bright band 160 representing the retro-reflective bands 102) are then determined.


During this process, the sum of pixel values for each pixel row of the calibration difference image is calculated to generate a horizontal intensity profile for the calibration difference image. A gradient filter is then applied to the horizontal intensity profile. The gradient filter takes the absolute value of the second derivative of the horizontal intensity profile and applies a sixteen (16) point Gaussian filter to smooth the result. Each region of data having values greater than fifty percent (50%) of the peak value is then examined to detect the region having the largest area. The midpoint of that region is then designated as the center pixel row. The first and last eighty (80) pixel rows of the horizontal intensity profile are not used during this process to reduce the impact of lighting artifacts and external infrared light sources.


Each pixel column of the calibration difference image is then processed to determine the pixels therein corresponding to the bright band 160. Initially, the locations of the image sensors 70 are not known and so an arbitrary processing direction is selected. In this embodiment, the pixel columns of the calibration difference image are processed from left to right. During processing of each pixel column, a small slice of the pixel data for the pixel column is taken based on the location of the center pixel row. In this embodiment, the slice comprises one hundred pixel rows centered on the center pixel row. Each image slice is cross-correlated with a Gaussian model used to approximate the retro-reflective bands 102 in intensity and width. The results of the cross-correlation identify the bright band 160 of the calibration difference image that represents the retro-reflective bands 102 of the bezel. This correlation is multiplied with the calibration image that was captured with the IR light source 82 on to highlight further the bright band 160 and reduce noise.


Afterwards, for each pixel column, a peak-search algorithm is then applied to the resulting pixel column data to locate peaks. If one peak is found, it is assumed that no differentiation between the retro-reflective bands 102 of the bezel and its reflection in the display surface 24 is possible in the pixel column. If two peaks are found, it is assumed that the retro-reflective bands of the bezel and their reflections in the display surface 24 are visible in the pixel column and can be differentiated. For each pixel column where two peaks are found, the width of the bright band 160 representing the retro-reflection bands and the band representing the reflection of the retro-reflective bands 102 in the display surface 24 are determined by finding the rising and falling edges surrounding the detected peaks. With the width of the bright band 160 in the pixel columns known, the bezel lines BretroT(x) and BretroB(x) can be estimated. From the width of the bright band 160, the upper dark band 162 is determined to be directly above the bright band 160 and to have a width general equal to that of the bright band. As bezel line BdarkB(x) is coincident with bezel line BretroT(x), the bezel line BdarkT(x) can also be estimated.


The start and end pixel columns of the bezel are then determined by looking at the intensity of the pixel column data for the first one hundred and fifty (150) and last first one hundred and fifty (150) pixel columns. The inner-most pixel column in the first one-hundred and fifty pixel columns that has a value lower than a threshold value is determined to be the start of the bezel and the inner-most pixel column in the last one-hundred and fifty pixel columns that has a value lower than the threshold value is determined to be the end of the bezel.


After the start and end points of the bezel have been found, a continuity check is performed to confirm that the pixels of the bright band 160 are close to each other from pixel column to pixel column. During this check, the pixels of the bright band 160 in adjacent pixel columns are compared to determine if the distance therebetween is beyond a threshold distance signifying a spike. For each detected spike, pixels of the bright band 160 on opposite sides of the spike region are interpolated and the interpolated values are used to replace the pixels of the spike. This process patches gaps in the bright band 160 caused by image sensor overexposure or bezel occlusion as well as to smooth out any misidentified bezel points.


The width of the bright band 160 at the left side and the right side of the resulting image is then examined. The side of the resulting image associated with the smallest bright band width is deemed to represent the portion of the bezel that is furthest from the image sensor 70. The procedure to determine the pixels of the bright band in each pixel column and continuity check discussed above are then re-performed. During this second pass, the direction the image data is processed is based on the location of the image sensor 70 relative to the bezel. The image data representing the portion of the bezel that is closest to the image sensor 70 is processed first. As a result, during the second pass, the pixel columns of the resulting image are processed from left to right for the image sensor 70 at the bottom left corner of the display surface 24 and from right to left for the image sensor 70 at the bottom right corner of the display surface 24 in the manner described above. During this second pass, the peak-search algorithm focuses around the pixel column data corresponding to the estimated bezel lines BretroT(x) and BretroB(x).


Turning now to FIGS. 8 to 14, one of the pen tools P for use in conjunction with the interactive input system 20 is shown and is generally identified by reference numeral 200. As can be seen, the pen tool P comprises a hollow body 200 formed by interconnected half shells that accommodates a tip assembly 202 at one end and an eraser assembly 204 at its other end. The tip assembly 202 comprises a printed circuit board 210 on which a controller 212 is mounted. The controller 212 communicates with a wireless unit 214 that broadcasts signals via wireless transmitters 216a and 216b such as for example, radio frequency (RF) antennae or IR LEDs. Tip switch contacts 218 are also mounted on the printed circuit board 210. A tip switch assembly 220 is mounted on the printed circuit board 210.


The tip switch assembly 220 comprises a polyester flex circuit 222 having a circular portion 223 that accommodates a contact circuit area 224. A contact lead 226 extends from the contact circuit area 224 and undergoes a ninety-degree turn relative to the plane of the circular portion 223. Leads 228 are attached to the contact lead 226 and terminate at crimp connectors 229. The crimp connectors 229 receive the tip switch contacts 218 thereby to connect electrically the tip switch assembly 220 to the controller 212. A plunger assembly 230 is aligned with the flex circuit 222. The plunger assembly 230 passes through a cap 232 that fits over the end of the body 200. The cap 232 has an externally threaded nose 234 that receives an internally threaded cone 236. The plunger assembly 230 extends through a hole in the cone 236 to define a writing tip for the pen tool P.


The plunger assembly 230 comprises a flexible cup 240 formed of silicone. The surface of the cup 240 that faces the flex circuit 222 has a conductive pad thereon 242. The conductive pad 242 is aligned with the contact circuit area 224. A generally cylindrical shaft 244 is received by a cylindrical tube 246 extending from the cup 240. The distal end of the shaft 244 has a nib 248 formed thereon.


The eraser assembly 204 comprises a battery carrier 250 having positive and negative leads. A printed circuit board 252 carrying a switch 254 that is electrically connected to the controller 212 is secured to one end of the battery carrier 250. A plunger 256 is aligned with the switch 254 and passes through a holder 260 that surrounds the printed circuit board 252 and one end of the battery carrier 250 and that fits over the end of the body 200. A cap 262 having a felt-like pad 264 thereon is received by the holder 260. A commercially available electrical subassembly 266 extends from the other end of the battery carrier 250 to the printed circuit board 210 and is retained by a half shell 268 that engages the end of the battery carrier 250. A spring 270 is accommodated by the battery carrier 250 to retain a battery 272 placed therein. The electrical subassembly 266 connects the battery 272 to the printed circuit boards 252 and 210 and provides a communication channel between the printed circuit boards.


When the pen tool P is brought into proximity with the display surface 24, its location relative to the display surface in (x,y) coordinates is calculated in the same manner as described above with reference to the passive pointer. However, depending on the manner in which the pen tool P is brought into contact with the display surface 24, the pen tool P may provide mode information that is used to interpret pen tool activity relative to the display surface 24. In particular, when the nib 248 of the pen tool P is brought into contact with the display surface 24 with sufficient force, the shaft 244 of the plunger assembly 230 moves inwardly into the body 200. This inward movement of the shaft 244 causes the cup 240 to flex thereby bringing the conductive pad 242 on the cup into contact the contact circuit area 224 of the flex circuit 222 resulting in closing of the tip switch assembly 220. Closing of the tip switch assembly 220 is sensed by the controller 212 and causes the controller 212 to condition the wireless unit 214 to output a modulated signal that is broadcast via the wireless transmitter 216a. The wireless transmitter 216a is positioned so that the modulated signal is emitter from the pen tool P slight aft of its tip.


The design of the plunger assembly 230 provides advantages in that a low activation force is required to move the shaft 244 of the plunger assembly 230 to close the tip switch assembly 220. Also, the shaft 244 of the plunger assembly 230 is not required to travel significantly into the body 200 to close the tip switch assembly 220. In particular, only about a 30 g activation force and a shaft travel equal to approximately 0.1 mm is required in order for the tip switch assembly 220 to close. The factors give the pen tool P a much more compliant writing feel with significantly less noise as compared to prior art pen tools. Also, the configuration of the flex circuit 222 gives the tip switch assembly 220 a slim profile so that the tip switch assembly has no appreciable impact on the diameter of the pen tool P.


When the cap 262 of the pen tool P is brought into contact with the display surface 24 with sufficient force, the cap 262 moves into the holder 260 thereby causing the plunger 256 to close the switch 254. Closing of the switch 254 is sensed by the controller 212 resulting in the controller 212 conditioning the wireless unit 214 to output a differently modulated signal that is broadcast via the wireless transmitter 216b. Similarly, the wireless transmitter 216b is positioned so that the modulated signal is emitter from the pen tool P slight aft of its eraser end.


The DSP unit 26 stores a modulated signal-to-pen tool mode mapping table in the memory 142. As a result, when a broadcast modulated signal is received by the controller 120 of the DSP unit 26 via the antenna 136, the controller 120 compares the received modulated signal to the mapping table to determine the pen tool mode. The controller 120 in turn uses this information to assign mode information to the generated pointer coordinates and conveys the mode information along with the pointer coordinates to the computer 30 so that the pointer coordinates are processed by the computer 30 in the desired manner. In this embodiment, when the nib 248 is in contact with the display surface 24 and the tip switch assembly 220 is closed, the pen tool P is deemed to be operating in an ink mode. Ink mode information is assigned to pointer coordinates generated by the controller 120 while the pen tool P is in this mode so that the computer 30 treats the pointer coordinates as writing or drawing (i.e. ink) on the display surface 24. When the cap 262 is in contact with the display surface 24 and the switch 254 is closed, the pen tool P is deemed to be operating in an eraser mode. Eraser mode information is assigned to pointer coordinates generated by the controller 120 while the pen tool is in this mode so that the computer 30 erases displayed ink at locations corresponding to the pointer coordinates. When no modulated signal is output by the pen tool P, the pen tool is deemed to be operating in a pointer mode and is treated in the same manner as a passive pointer. Pointer mode information is assigned to pointer coordinates generated by the controller 120 while the pen tool is in this mode so that the computer 30 treats the pointer coordinates as mouse events.


If desired, the IR light sources 82 can be modulated as described in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/118,521 to McReynolds et al. entitled “Interactive Input System with Controlled Lighting” filed concurrently herewith and assigned to SMART Technologies ULC of Calgary, Alberta, the content of which is incorporated by reference. In this manner, image frames for each imaging assembly based only on the contribution of illumination from its associated IR light source can be generated. The modulated signals output by the pen tool P can also be modulated.


While FIGS. 8 to 14 show an exemplary pen tool, those of skill in the art will appreciate that pen tools P of different configurations can be used in conjunction with the interactive input system 20. For example, FIG. 15 shows an alternative pen tool P wherein tip assemblies 302 and 304 having similar physical geometries are provided at opposite ends of the pen tool body 306. In this case, the modulated signal output by the pen tool P differs depending on the tip assembly that is brought into contact with the display surface 24.



FIGS. 16
a and 16b show yet another pen tool P for use in conjunction with the interactive input system 20. In this embodiment, the tip assembly 402 is similar to that in the previous embodiments. The eraser assembly 404 has a more rounded physical configuration. Unlike the previous embodiments, a slider switch 410 that is moveable between mouse and eraser positions is provided on the body 412 of the pen tool P. The position of the slider switch 410 is sensed by the controller 212 and is used to determine the form of the modulated signal that is output by the pen tool P when the eraser assembly 404 is brought into contact with the display surface 24. When the slider switch 410 is positioned in the mouse position as shown in FIG. 16a and the eraser assembly 404 is brought into contact with the display surface 24 with sufficient force to close the switch 254, the pen tool P outputs a modulated signal that is compared to the mapping table by the controller 120 to determine that the pen tool is operating in a pointer mode. The controller 120 in turn assigns pointer mode information to the generated pointer coordinates. Similarly, when the slider switch 410 is positioned in the eraser position as shown in FIG. 14b and the eraser assembly 404 is brought into contact with the display surface with sufficient force to close the switch 254, the pen tool P outputs a differently modulated signal that is compared to the mapping table by the controller 120 to determine that the pen tool is operating in an eraser mode. The controller 120 in turn assigns eraser mode information to the generated pointer coordinates.



FIGS. 17
a and 17b show yet another pen tool P for use in conjunction with the interactive input system 20. In this embodiment, tip assemblies 502 and 504 having generally the same physical configuration are provided at opposite ends of the body 506. A slider switch 510 is provided on the body 506 of the pen tool P and is moveable towards the tip assembly 502 between two positions as well as moveable towards the tip assembly 504 between two positions. In particular, the slider switch 510 is moveable towards the tip assembly 502 between ink and eraser positions and towards the tip assembly 504 between select and right click positions. The position of the slider switch 510 is sensed by the controller 212 and used to determine the form of the modulated signal that is output by the pen tool P when a tip assembly is brought into contact with the display surface 24 with sufficient force to close the tip switch assembly 220.


When the slider switch 510 is positioned in the ink position as shown in FIG. 17a and the plunger of the tip assembly 502 is brought into contact with the display surface 24 with sufficient force to close the tip switch assembly 220, the pen tool outputs a modulated signal that is compared to the mapping table by the controller 120 to determine that the pen tool P is operating in an ink mode. The controller 120 in turn assigns ink mode information to the generated pointer coordinates. Similarly, when the slider switch 510 is positioned in the eraser position as shown in FIG. 17b and the plunger of the tip assembly 502 is brought into contact with the display surface 24 with sufficient force to close the tip switch assembly 220, the pen tool outputs a differently modulated signal that is compared to the mapping table by the controller 120 to determine that the pen tool P is operating in an eraser mode. The controller 120 in turn assigns eraser mode information to the generated pointer coordinates. When the slider switch 510 is positioned in the select position as shown in FIG. 17a and the plunger of the tip assembly 504 is brought into contact with the display surface 24 with sufficient force to close the tip switch assembly 220, the pen tool P outputs yet another differently modulated signal that is compared to the mapping table by the controller 120 to determine that the pen tool P is operating in a select mode. The controller 120 in turn assigns select mode information to the generated pointer coordinates. Similarly, when the slider switch 510 is positioned in the right click position as shown in FIG. 17b and the plunger of the tip assembly 504 is brought into contact with the display surface 24 with sufficient force to close this tip switch assembly 220, the pen tool P outputs still yet another differently modulated signal that is compared to the mapping table by the controller 120 to determine that the pen tool is operating in a right click mode. The controller 120 in turn assigns right click mode information to the generated pointer coordinates.



FIG. 18 shows still yet another pen tool P for use in conjunction with the interactive input system 20. In this embodiment, the pen tool P has three tip assemblies 602 and 606, each of which is associated with a different pen tool mode. In particular, in this embodiment, tip assembly 602 is associated with the ink mode, tip assembly 604 is associated with the eraser mode and tip assembly 606 is associated with the select mode. The modulated signal that is output by the pen tool P differs depending on the tip assembly that is brought into contact with the display surface 24.


If desired, rather than having the modulated signal-to-pen tool mode mappings in the mapping table statically assigned, the computer 30 can be responsive to user input to present a graphical user interface 700 that presents the mappings visually and allows the user to change the pen tool mode that is associated with each modulated signal output by the pen tools P as shown in FIG. 19.


In addition to using the modulated signal output by the pen tool P to determine the pen tool type (i.e. its mode of operation), an attribute may be assigned to the modulated signal to control further the manner by which the computer 30 processes pointer coordinates. For example, if the user is contacting the display surface 24 with an eraser assembly (or a tip assembly representing an eraser mode) of a pen tool P, an attribute may be assigned to the modulated signal in the mapping table so that only ink that has been input using that specific pen tool P or only ink of a certain color or only ink bounded by a selected geometric shape (e.g. rectangles, circles, squares, etc.) is erased when the pointer coordinates are processed by the computer 30.


As will be appreciated, although specific pen tool modes are described, those of skill in the art will appreciate that alternative pen tool modes or different combinations of pen tools modes can be assigned to the modulated signals output by the pen tools. Although pen tools P with slider switches are illustrated, pen tools with alternative input interfaces can of course be used to allow the user to select the pen tool mode(s). For example, the pen tool P may comprise multiple button switches, a single button switch that toggles through multiple positions, rotating switches, one or more scroll wheels, pressure or orientation sensitive switches etc. with each switch or switch position being associated with a pen tool operation mode. Alternatively, the pen tool P may include a microphone and the controller 212 may execute voice recognition software to enable the pen tool mode to be selected by the user through input voice commands. Haptic commands such as tapping the edge of the display screen 24 may also be used to enable the pen tool mode to be selected.


Although specific embodiments have been described above with reference to the figures, those of skill in the art will appreciate that other alternatives are available. For example, in the above embodiment, the DSP unit 26 is shown as comprising an antenna 136 and a wireless receiver 138 to receive the modulated signals output by the pen tool P. Alternatively, each imaging assembly 60 can be provided with an antenna and a wireless receiver to receive the modulated signals output by the pen tool P. In this case, modulated signals received by the imaging assemblies are sent to the DSP unit 26 together with the image frames. The pen tool P may also be tethered to the assembly 22 or DSP unit 26 allowing the signals output by the pen tool P to be conveyed to one or more of the imaging assemblies 60 or the DSP unit 26 or imaging assembly(s) over a wired connection.


In the above embodiment, discontinuity values D(x) are examined and processed to determine the existence and location of a pointer. Those of skill in the art will appreciate that the VIPretro and VIPdark values may be processed directly to determine the existence and location of a pointer.


In an alternative embodiment, the imaging assemblies 60 may look across the display surface 24 such that the reflection of the retro-reflective band 102 appearing on the display surface 24 is captured in image frames and appears in the image frames as a light band spaced from and below the bright band 160. During processing of these image frames, each image frame is separated into three regions, namely a dark region corresponding to the contribution from the IR radiation absorbing bands 104 of the bezel segments, a very bright (retro-reflective) region corresponding to the contribution from the retro-reflective bands 102 of the bezel segments and a bright (reflective) region corresponding to the contribution from the reflection of the retro-reflective bands 102 appearing on the display surface 24.


Once separated, the controller 120 generates VIPs for the individual regions and processes the VIPs to determine if a pointer in proximity with the display surface 24 exists and if so, its position in (x,y) coordinates relative to the display surface 24.


In order to detect a pointer in proximity with the display surface 24, after the VIPs for the dark, retro-reflective and reflective regions have been generated, each VIP value of the dark region VIP is subtracted from its corresponding VIP value of the retro-reflective VIP. Each difference is examined to determine if it is less than a threshold level. If so, the pixel column of the retro-reflective VIP is flagged. Afterwards, a dilation procedure is performed to detect spurious flags. In particular, for each flagged pixel column of the retro-reflective VIP, a check is made to determine whether the pixel columns to its left and right are also flagged. If so, the pixel column is flagged as representing a pointer.


A continuity check is then performed. During the continuity check, each VIP value of the dark region VIP is subtracted from its corresponding VIP value of the reflective VIP. Again each difference is examined to determine if it is less than a threshold level. If so, the pixel column of the reflective VIP is flagged. A dilation similar to that described above is performed with respect to the flagged pixel columns of the reflective VIP. Following this, in order to locate the pointer, the flagged pixel columns of the retro-reflective VIP and the reflective VIP are compared to detect overlapping flagged pixel columns. If overlapping pixel columns are detected, the pixel columns at the boundaries of the overlap in the reflective VIP are deemed to represent the edges of the pointer. The pixel column at the midpoint between the boundary pixel columns is then deemed to represent the location of the pointer in the image frame.


In the above embodiments, each bezel segment 40 to 44 is shown as comprising a pair of bands having different reflective properties, namely retro-reflective and IR radiation absorbing. Those of skill in the art will appreciate that the order of the bands may be reversed. Also, bands having different reflective properties may be employed. For example, rather than using a retro-reflective band, a band formed of highly reflective material may be used. Alternatively, bezel segments comprising more than two bands with the bands having differing or alternating reflective properties may be used. For example, each bezel segment may comprise two or more retro-reflective bands and two or more radiation absorbing bands in an alternating arrangement. Alternatively, one or more of the retro-reflective bands may be replaced with a highly reflective band. When the image frames are separated into different regions and processed, upper regions are particularly useful during processing to detect pointer existence but not necessarily pointer location. As will be appreciated, if the pointer is brought towards the display surface 24 at a sharp angle, its position in an upper band relative to the display surface 24 may differ significantly from the position of the pointer tip in the band proximate to the display surface 24 as shown in FIG. 20.


If desired the tilt of each bezel segment can be adjusted to control the amount of light reflected by the display surface itself and subsequently toward the image sensors 70 of the imaging assemblies 60.


Although the frame assembly is described as being attached to the display unit, those of skill in the art will appreciate that the frame assembly may take other configurations. For example, the frame assembly may be integral with the bezel 38. If desired, the assembly 22 may comprise its own panel to overlie the display surface 24. In this case it is preferred that the panel be formed of substantially transparent material so that the image presented on the display surface 24 is clearly visible through the panel. The assembly can of course be used with a front or rear projection device and surround a substrate on which the computer-generated image is projected.


Although the imaging assemblies are described as being accommodated by the corner pieces adjacent the bottom corners of the display surface, those of skill in the art will appreciate that the imaging assemblies may be placed at different locations relative to the display surface. Also, the tool tray segment is not required and may be replaced with a bezel segment.


Those of skill in the art will appreciate that although the operation of the interactive input system 20 has been described with reference to a single pointer or pen tool P being positioned in proximity with the display surface 24, the interactive input system 20 is capable of detecting the existence of multiple pointers/pen tools that are proximate to the touch surface as each pointer appears in the image frames captured by the image sensors.


Although preferred embodiments have been described, those of skill in the art will appreciate that variations and modifications may be made with departing from the spirit and scope thereof as defined by the appended claims.

Claims
  • 1. An interactive input system comprising: a bezel at least partially surrounding a region of interest, a surface of said bezel facing said region of interest having a plurality of generally parallel, longitudinally extending bands thereon with all adjacent bands having different optical properties and wherein said bands comprise at least one band that reflects illumination and at least one band that absorbs illumination, all of said longitudinally extending bands being adapted to be disposed above a display surface within the region of interest;at least one imaging device looking into said region of interest in a direction substantially orthogonal to the plane of the surface of said longitudinally extending bands and seeing the surface of said at least one bezel so that images acquired by said at least one imaging device comprise regions corresponding to said bands; andprocessing structure processing pixels corresponding to the adjacent bands having different optical properties to detect the existence of a pointer in said region of interest, wherein during said processing, said processing structure determines differences between pixel intensity profiles calculated for each of said adjacent bands and compares the pixel intensity profile of each of said adjacent bands to detect at least one discontinuity between adjacent bands.
  • 2. An interactive input system according to claim 1 wherein said at least one band that reflects illumination comprises a band of retro-reflective material.
  • 3. An interactive input system according to claim 2 wherein said at least one band that absorbs illumination comprises a band of infrared light absorbing material.
  • 4. An interactive input system according to claim 1 wherein said at least one band that absorbs illumination comprises a band of infrared light absorbing material.
  • 5. An interactive input system according to claim 3 wherein said bezel comprises at least one generally planar surface on which said bands are provided, the plane of said at least one bezel surface being generally normal to the plane of said display surface.
  • 6. An interactive input system according to claim 5 wherein said bands comprise at least one band that reflects illumination and at least one band that absorbs illumination.
  • 7. An interactive input system according to claim 6 wherein said at least one band that reflects illumination comprises a band of retro-reflective material.
  • 8. An interactive input system according to claim 6 wherein said at least one band that absorbs illumination comprises a band of infrared light absorbing material.
  • 9. An interactive input system according to claim 1 wherein said bezel comprises at least one generally planar surface on which said bands are provided, the plane of said at least one bezel surface of said bezel being generally normal to the plane of said generally planar surface.
  • 10. An interactive input system comprising: a bezel at least partially surrounding a region of interest, a surface of said bezel facing said region of interest having a plurality of longitudinally extending bands thereon with all adjacent bands having different optical properties and wherein said bands comprise at least one band that reflects illumination and at least one band that absorbs illumination, all of said longitudinally extending bands being adapted to be disposed above a display surface within the region of interest;at least one imaging device looking into said region of interest in a direction substantially orthogonal to the plane of the surface of said longitudinally extending bands and seeing the surface of said bezel; andprocessing structure communicating with said at least one imaging device and processing image data generated by said at least one imaging device corresponding the adjacent bands having different optical properties to detect the existence of a pointer in said region of interest irrespective of pointer type, wherein during said processing, said processing structure processes said image data to determine differences between pixel intensity profiles calculated for each of said adjacent bands and compares the pixel intensity profile of each of said adjacent bands to detect at least one discontinuity between adjacent bands caused by the existence of said pointer.
  • 11. An interactive input system according to claim 10, wherein the optical properties of said bands are selected from (i) reflective, (ii) retro-reflective, and (iii) radiation absorbing.
  • 12. An interactive input system according to claim 11 wherein said bands are generally horizontal.
  • 13. An interactive input system according to claim 11 wherein said bezel comprises at least one generally planar surface on which said bands are provided, the plane of said at least one bezel surface being generally normal to the plane of said display surface.
  • 14. An interactive input system according to claim 11 wherein said bezel comprises two bands.
  • 15. An interactive input system according to claim 14 wherein said bezel comprises a retro-reflective band and a radiation absorbing band.
  • 16. An interactive input system according to claim 14 wherein said bezel comprises at least three bands.
US Referenced Citations (414)
Number Name Date Kind
2769374 Sick Nov 1956 A
3025406 Stewart et al. Mar 1962 A
3128340 Harmon Apr 1964 A
3187185 Milnes Jun 1965 A
3360654 Muller Dec 1967 A
3478220 Milroy Nov 1969 A
3613066 Cooreman Oct 1971 A
3764813 Clement et al. Oct 1973 A
3775560 Ebeling et al. Nov 1973 A
3857022 Rebane et al. Dec 1974 A
3860754 Johnson et al. Jan 1975 A
4107522 Walter Aug 1978 A
4144449 Funk et al. Mar 1979 A
4243879 Carroll et al. Jan 1981 A
4247767 O'Brien et al. Jan 1981 A
4420261 Barlow et al. Dec 1983 A
4459476 Weissmueller et al. Jul 1984 A
4468694 Edgar Aug 1984 A
4507557 Tsikos Mar 1985 A
4550250 Mueller et al. Oct 1985 A
4553842 Griffin Nov 1985 A
4558313 Garwin et al. Dec 1985 A
4639720 Rympalski et al. Jan 1987 A
4672364 Lucas Jun 1987 A
4673918 Adler et al. Jun 1987 A
4703316 Sherbeck Oct 1987 A
4710760 Kasday Dec 1987 A
4737631 Sasaki et al. Apr 1988 A
4742221 Sasaki et al. May 1988 A
4746770 McAvinney May 1988 A
4762990 Caswell et al. Aug 1988 A
4766424 Adler et al. Aug 1988 A
4782328 Denlinger Nov 1988 A
4811004 Person et al. Mar 1989 A
4818826 Kimura Apr 1989 A
4820050 Griffin Apr 1989 A
4822145 Staelin Apr 1989 A
4831455 Ishikawa May 1989 A
4851664 Rieger Jul 1989 A
4868551 Arditty et al. Sep 1989 A
4868912 Doering Sep 1989 A
4888479 Tamaru Dec 1989 A
4893120 Doering et al. Jan 1990 A
4916308 Meadows Apr 1990 A
4928094 Smith May 1990 A
4943806 Masters et al. Jul 1990 A
4980547 Griffin Dec 1990 A
4990901 Beiswenger Feb 1991 A
5025314 Tang et al. Jun 1991 A
5025411 Tallman et al. Jun 1991 A
5097516 Amir Mar 1992 A
5103085 Zimmerman Apr 1992 A
5105186 May Apr 1992 A
5109435 Lo et al. Apr 1992 A
5130794 Ritchey Jul 1992 A
5140647 Ise et al. Aug 1992 A
5148015 Dolan Sep 1992 A
5162618 Knowles Nov 1992 A
5162783 Moreno Nov 1992 A
5164714 Wehrer Nov 1992 A
5168531 Sigel Dec 1992 A
5179369 Person et al. Jan 1993 A
5196835 Blue et al. Mar 1993 A
5196836 Williams Mar 1993 A
5239152 Caldwell et al. Aug 1993 A
5239373 Tang et al. Aug 1993 A
5272470 Zetts Dec 1993 A
5317140 Dunthorn May 1994 A
5359155 Helser Oct 1994 A
5374971 Clapp et al. Dec 1994 A
5414413 Tamaru et al. May 1995 A
5422494 West et al. Jun 1995 A
5448263 Martin Sep 1995 A
5457289 Huang et al. Oct 1995 A
5483261 Yasutake Jan 1996 A
5483603 Luke et al. Jan 1996 A
5484966 Segen Jan 1996 A
5490655 Bates Feb 1996 A
5502568 Ogawa et al. Mar 1996 A
5525764 Junkins et al. Jun 1996 A
5528263 Platzker et al. Jun 1996 A
5528290 Saund Jun 1996 A
5537107 Funado Jul 1996 A
5554828 Primm Sep 1996 A
5581276 Cipolla et al. Dec 1996 A
5581637 Cass et al. Dec 1996 A
5591945 Kent Jan 1997 A
5594469 Freeman et al. Jan 1997 A
5594502 Bito et al. Jan 1997 A
5617312 Iura et al. Apr 1997 A
5638092 Eng et al. Jun 1997 A
5670755 Kwon Sep 1997 A
5686942 Ball Nov 1997 A
5698845 Kodama et al. Dec 1997 A
5729704 Stone et al. Mar 1998 A
5734375 Knox et al. Mar 1998 A
5736686 Perret, Jr. et al. Apr 1998 A
5737740 Henderson et al. Apr 1998 A
5739479 Davis-Cannon Apr 1998 A
5745116 Pisutha-Arnond Apr 1998 A
5764223 Chang et al. Jun 1998 A
5771039 Ditzik Jun 1998 A
5784054 Armstrong et al. Jul 1998 A
5785439 Bowen Jul 1998 A
5786810 Knox et al. Jul 1998 A
5790910 Haskin Aug 1998 A
5801704 Oohara et al. Sep 1998 A
5804773 Wilson et al. Sep 1998 A
5818421 Ogino et al. Oct 1998 A
5818424 Korth Oct 1998 A
5819201 DeGraaf Oct 1998 A
5825352 Bisset et al. Oct 1998 A
5831602 Sato et al. Nov 1998 A
5854491 Pryor et al. Dec 1998 A
5909210 Knox et al. Jun 1999 A
5911004 Ohuchi et al. Jun 1999 A
5914709 Graham et al. Jun 1999 A
5920342 Umeda et al. Jul 1999 A
5936615 Waters Aug 1999 A
5940065 Babb et al. Aug 1999 A
5943783 Jackson Aug 1999 A
5963199 Kato et al. Oct 1999 A
5982352 Pryor Nov 1999 A
5988645 Downing Nov 1999 A
5990874 Tsumura Nov 1999 A
6002808 Freeman Dec 1999 A
6008798 Mato, Jr. et al. Dec 1999 A
6031531 Kimble Feb 2000 A
6061177 Fujimoto May 2000 A
6075905 Herman et al. Jun 2000 A
6076041 Watanabe Jun 2000 A
6091406 Kambara et al. Jul 2000 A
6100538 Ogawa Aug 2000 A
6104387 Chery et al. Aug 2000 A
6118433 Jenkin et al. Sep 2000 A
6122865 Branc et al. Sep 2000 A
6128003 Smith et al. Oct 2000 A
6141000 Martin Oct 2000 A
6144366 Numazaki et al. Nov 2000 A
6147678 Kumar et al. Nov 2000 A
6153836 Goszyk Nov 2000 A
6161066 Wright et al. Dec 2000 A
6179426 Rodriguez, Jr. et al. Jan 2001 B1
6188388 Arita et al. Feb 2001 B1
6191773 Maruno et al. Feb 2001 B1
6208329 Ballare Mar 2001 B1
6208330 Hasegawa et al. Mar 2001 B1
6209266 Branc et al. Apr 2001 B1
6215477 Morrison et al. Apr 2001 B1
6222175 Krymski Apr 2001 B1
6226035 Korein et al. May 2001 B1
6229529 Yano et al. May 2001 B1
6232962 Davis et al. May 2001 B1
6252989 Geisler et al. Jun 2001 B1
6256033 Nguyen Jul 2001 B1
6262718 Findlay et al. Jul 2001 B1
6310610 Beaton et al. Oct 2001 B1
6320597 Ieperen Nov 2001 B1
6323846 Westerman et al. Nov 2001 B1
6326954 Van Ieperen Dec 2001 B1
6328270 Elberbaum Dec 2001 B1
6335724 Takekawa et al. Jan 2002 B1
6337681 Martin Jan 2002 B1
6339748 Hiramatsu Jan 2002 B1
6346966 Toh Feb 2002 B1
6352351 Ogasahara et al. Mar 2002 B1
6353434 Akebi et al. Mar 2002 B1
6359612 Peter et al. Mar 2002 B1
6362468 Murakami et al. Mar 2002 B1
6377228 Jenkin et al. Apr 2002 B1
6384743 Vanderheiden May 2002 B1
6414671 Gillespie et al. Jul 2002 B1
6414673 Wood et al. Jul 2002 B1
6421042 Omura et al. Jul 2002 B1
6427389 Branc et al. Aug 2002 B1
6429856 Omura et al. Aug 2002 B1
6429857 Masters et al. Aug 2002 B1
6480187 Sano et al. Nov 2002 B1
6496122 Sampsell Dec 2002 B2
6497608 Ho et al. Dec 2002 B2
6498602 Ogawa Dec 2002 B1
6504532 Ogasahara et al. Jan 2003 B1
6507339 Tanaka Jan 2003 B1
6512513 Fleck et al. Jan 2003 B2
6512838 Rafii et al. Jan 2003 B1
6517266 Saund Feb 2003 B2
6518600 Shaddock Feb 2003 B1
6522830 Yamagami Feb 2003 B2
6529189 Colgan et al. Mar 2003 B1
6530664 Vanderwerf et al. Mar 2003 B2
6531999 Trajkovic Mar 2003 B1
6532006 Takekawa et al. Mar 2003 B1
6540366 Keenan et al. Apr 2003 B2
6540679 Slayton et al. Apr 2003 B2
6545669 Kinawi et al. Apr 2003 B1
6559813 DeLuca et al. May 2003 B1
6563491 Omura May 2003 B1
6567078 Ogawa May 2003 B2
6567121 Kuno May 2003 B1
6570103 Saka et al. May 2003 B1
6570612 Saund et al. May 2003 B1
6577299 Schiller et al. Jun 2003 B1
6587099 Takekawa Jul 2003 B2
6590568 Astala et al. Jul 2003 B1
6594023 Omura et al. Jul 2003 B1
6597348 Yamazaki et al. Jul 2003 B1
6597508 Seino et al. Jul 2003 B2
6603867 Sugino et al. Aug 2003 B1
6608619 Omura et al. Aug 2003 B2
6614422 Rafii et al. Sep 2003 B1
6624833 Kumar et al. Sep 2003 B1
6626718 Hiroki Sep 2003 B2
6630922 Fishkin et al. Oct 2003 B2
6633328 Byrd et al. Oct 2003 B1
6650318 Arnon Nov 2003 B1
6650822 Zhou Nov 2003 B1
6674424 Fujioka Jan 2004 B1
6683584 Ronzani et al. Jan 2004 B2
6690357 Dunton et al. Feb 2004 B1
6690363 Newton Feb 2004 B2
6690397 Daignault, Jr. Feb 2004 B1
6710770 Tomasi et al. Mar 2004 B2
6714311 Hashimoto Mar 2004 B2
6720949 Pryor et al. Apr 2004 B1
6736321 Tsikos et al. May 2004 B2
6738051 Boyd et al. May 2004 B2
6741250 Furlan et al. May 2004 B1
6747636 Martin Jun 2004 B2
6756910 Ohba et al. Jun 2004 B2
6760009 Omura et al. Jul 2004 B2
6760999 Branc et al. Jul 2004 B2
6774889 Zhang et al. Aug 2004 B1
6778207 Lee et al. Aug 2004 B1
6803906 Morrison et al. Oct 2004 B1
6828959 Takekawa et al. Dec 2004 B2
6829372 Fujioka Dec 2004 B2
6864882 Newton Mar 2005 B2
6911972 Brinjes Jun 2005 B2
6919880 Morrison et al. Jul 2005 B2
6927384 Reime et al. Aug 2005 B2
6933981 Kishida et al. Aug 2005 B1
6947032 Morrison et al. Sep 2005 B2
6954197 Morrison et al. Oct 2005 B2
6972401 Akitt et al. Dec 2005 B2
6972753 Kimura et al. Dec 2005 B1
7002555 Jacobsen et al. Feb 2006 B1
7007236 Dempski et al. Feb 2006 B2
7015418 Cahill et al. Mar 2006 B2
7030861 Westerman et al. Apr 2006 B1
7057647 Monroe Jun 2006 B1
7058204 Hildreth et al. Jun 2006 B2
7075054 Iwamoto et al. Jul 2006 B2
7084857 Lieberman et al. Aug 2006 B2
7084859 Pryor Aug 2006 B1
7084868 Farag et al. Aug 2006 B2
7098392 Sitrick et al. Aug 2006 B2
7121470 McCall et al. Oct 2006 B2
7151533 Van Iperen Dec 2006 B2
7176904 Satoh Feb 2007 B2
7184030 McCharles et al. Feb 2007 B2
7187489 Miles Mar 2007 B2
7190348 Kennedy et al. Mar 2007 B2
7190496 Klug et al. Mar 2007 B2
7202860 Ogawa Apr 2007 B2
7227526 Hildreth et al. Jun 2007 B2
7232986 Worthington et al. Jun 2007 B2
7236162 Morrison et al. Jun 2007 B2
7237937 Kawashima et al. Jul 2007 B2
7242388 Lieberman et al. Jul 2007 B2
7265748 Ryynanen Sep 2007 B2
7268692 Lieberman et al. Sep 2007 B1
7274356 Ung et al. Sep 2007 B2
7283126 Leung Oct 2007 B2
7283128 Sato Oct 2007 B2
7289113 Martin Oct 2007 B2
7302156 Lieberman et al. Nov 2007 B1
7305368 Lieberman et al. Dec 2007 B2
7330184 Leung Feb 2008 B2
7333094 Lieberman et al. Feb 2008 B2
7333095 Lieberman et al. Feb 2008 B1
7355593 Hill et al. Apr 2008 B2
7372456 McLintock May 2008 B2
7375720 Tanaka May 2008 B2
RE40368 Arnon Jun 2008 E
7411575 Hill et al. Aug 2008 B2
7414617 Ogawa Aug 2008 B2
7479949 Jobs et al. Jan 2009 B2
7492357 Morrison et al. Feb 2009 B2
7499037 Lube Mar 2009 B2
7538759 Newton May 2009 B2
7559664 Walleman et al. Jul 2009 B1
7619617 Morrison et al. Nov 2009 B2
7692625 Morrison et al. Apr 2010 B2
20010019325 Takekawa Sep 2001 A1
20010022579 Hirabayashi Sep 2001 A1
20010026268 Ito Oct 2001 A1
20010033274 Ong Oct 2001 A1
20010050677 Tosaya Dec 2001 A1
20010055006 Sano et al. Dec 2001 A1
20020008692 Omura et al. Jan 2002 A1
20020015159 Hashimoto Feb 2002 A1
20020036617 Pryor Mar 2002 A1
20020041327 Hildreth et al. Apr 2002 A1
20020050979 Oberoi et al. May 2002 A1
20020064382 Hildreth et al. May 2002 A1
20020067922 Harris Jun 2002 A1
20020075243 Newton Jun 2002 A1
20020080123 Kennedy et al. Jun 2002 A1
20020118177 Newton Aug 2002 A1
20020145595 Satoh Oct 2002 A1
20020163530 Takakura et al. Nov 2002 A1
20030001825 Omura et al. Jan 2003 A1
20030025951 Pollard et al. Feb 2003 A1
20030043116 Morrison et al. Mar 2003 A1
20030046401 Abbott et al. Mar 2003 A1
20030063073 Geaghan et al. Apr 2003 A1
20030071858 Morohoshi Apr 2003 A1
20030085871 Ogawa May 2003 A1
20030095112 Kawano et al. May 2003 A1
20030137494 Tulbert Jul 2003 A1
20030142880 Hyodo Jul 2003 A1
20030151532 Chen et al. Aug 2003 A1
20030151562 Kulas Aug 2003 A1
20030156118 Ayinde Aug 2003 A1
20030161524 King Aug 2003 A1
20030210803 Kaneda et al. Nov 2003 A1
20030227492 Wilde et al. Dec 2003 A1
20030234346 Kao Dec 2003 A1
20040001144 McCharles et al. Jan 2004 A1
20040012573 Morrison et al. Jan 2004 A1
20040021633 Rajkowski Feb 2004 A1
20040031779 Cahill et al. Feb 2004 A1
20040032401 Nakazawa et al. Feb 2004 A1
20040046749 Ikeda Mar 2004 A1
20040051709 Ogawa et al. Mar 2004 A1
20040071363 Kouri et al. Apr 2004 A1
20040108990 Lieberman Jun 2004 A1
20040125086 Hagermoser et al. Jul 2004 A1
20040149892 Akitt et al. Aug 2004 A1
20040150630 Hinckley et al. Aug 2004 A1
20040169639 Pate et al. Sep 2004 A1
20040178993 Morrison et al. Sep 2004 A1
20040178997 Gillespie et al. Sep 2004 A1
20040179001 Morrison et al. Sep 2004 A1
20040189720 Wilson et al. Sep 2004 A1
20040201575 Morrison Oct 2004 A1
20040204129 Payne et al. Oct 2004 A1
20040218479 Iwamoto et al. Nov 2004 A1
20040221265 Leung et al. Nov 2004 A1
20040252091 Ma et al. Dec 2004 A1
20050052427 Wu et al. Mar 2005 A1
20050057524 Hill et al. Mar 2005 A1
20050077452 Morrison et al. Apr 2005 A1
20050083308 Homer et al. Apr 2005 A1
20050104860 McCreary et al. May 2005 A1
20050128190 Ryynanen Jun 2005 A1
20050151733 Sander et al. Jul 2005 A1
20050156900 Hill et al. Jul 2005 A1
20050190162 Newton Sep 2005 A1
20050241929 Auger et al. Nov 2005 A1
20050243070 Ung et al. Nov 2005 A1
20050248539 Morrison et al. Nov 2005 A1
20050248540 Newton Nov 2005 A1
20050270781 Marks Dec 2005 A1
20050276448 Pryor Dec 2005 A1
20060012579 Sato Jan 2006 A1
20060022962 Morrison et al. Feb 2006 A1
20060028456 Kang Feb 2006 A1
20060034486 Morrison et al. Feb 2006 A1
20060152500 Weng Jul 2006 A1
20060158437 Blythe et al. Jul 2006 A1
20060170658 Nakamura et al. Aug 2006 A1
20060192799 Vega et al. Aug 2006 A1
20060197749 Popovich Sep 2006 A1
20060202953 Pryor et al. Sep 2006 A1
20060227120 Eikman Oct 2006 A1
20060244734 Hill et al. Nov 2006 A1
20060274067 Hikai Dec 2006 A1
20060279558 Van Delden et al. Dec 2006 A1
20070002028 Morrison et al. Jan 2007 A1
20070019103 Lieberman et al. Jan 2007 A1
20070075648 Blythe et al. Apr 2007 A1
20070075982 Morrison et al. Apr 2007 A1
20070089915 Ogawa et al. Apr 2007 A1
20070116333 Dempski et al. May 2007 A1
20070126755 Zhang et al. Jun 2007 A1
20070139932 Sun et al. Jun 2007 A1
20070152984 Ording et al. Jul 2007 A1
20070152986 Ogawa et al. Jul 2007 A1
20070165007 Morrison et al. Jul 2007 A1
20070167709 Slayton et al. Jul 2007 A1
20070205994 van Ieperen Sep 2007 A1
20070236454 Ung et al. Oct 2007 A1
20070269107 Iwai et al. Nov 2007 A1
20070273842 Morrison Nov 2007 A1
20070290996 Ting Dec 2007 A1
20070291125 Marquet Dec 2007 A1
20080029691 Han Feb 2008 A1
20080042999 Martin Feb 2008 A1
20080055262 Wu et al. Mar 2008 A1
20080055267 Wu et al. Mar 2008 A1
20080062140 Hotelling et al. Mar 2008 A1
20080062149 Baruk Mar 2008 A1
20080068352 Worthington et al. Mar 2008 A1
20080083602 Auger et al. Apr 2008 A1
20080106706 Holmgren et al. May 2008 A1
20080122803 Izadi et al. May 2008 A1
20080129707 Pryor Jun 2008 A1
20080259050 Lin et al. Oct 2008 A1
20080259052 Lin et al. Oct 2008 A1
20090058832 Newton Mar 2009 A1
20090058833 Newton Mar 2009 A1
20090146972 Morrison et al. Jun 2009 A1
20090200384 Masalkar Aug 2009 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (152)
Number Date Country
2003233728 Dec 2003 AU
2006243730 Nov 2006 AU
2058219 Apr 1993 CA
2367864 Apr 1993 CA
2219886 Apr 1999 CA
2251221 Apr 1999 CA
2267733 Oct 1999 CA
2268208 Oct 1999 CA
2252302 Apr 2000 CA
2350152 Jun 2001 CA
2412878 Jan 2002 CA
2341918 Sep 2002 CA
2386094 Dec 2002 CA
2372868 Aug 2003 CA
2390503 Dec 2003 CA
2390506 Dec 2003 CA
2432770 Dec 2003 CA
2493236 Dec 2003 CA
2448603 May 2004 CA
2453873 Jul 2004 CA
2460449 Sep 2004 CA
2521418 Oct 2004 CA
2481396 Mar 2005 CA
2491582 Jul 2005 CA
2563566 Nov 2005 CA
2564262 Nov 2005 CA
2501214 Sep 2006 CA
2606863 Nov 2006 CA
2580046 Sep 2007 CA
1310126 Aug 2001 CN
1784649 Jun 2006 CN
101019096 Aug 2007 CN
101023582 Aug 2007 CN
1440539 Sep 2009 CN
3836429 May 1990 DE
198 10 452 Dec 1998 DE
60124549 Sep 2007 DE
0125068 Nov 1984 EP
0 279 652 Aug 1988 EP
0 347 725 Dec 1989 EP
0420335 Apr 1991 EP
0 657 841 Jun 1995 EP
0 762 319 Mar 1997 EP
0 829 798 Mar 1998 EP
0897161 Feb 1999 EP
0911721 Apr 1999 EP
1059605 Dec 2000 EP
1262909 Dec 2002 EP
1739528 Jan 2003 EP
1739529 Jan 2003 EP
1420335 May 2004 EP
1 450 243 Aug 2004 EP
1457870 Sep 2004 EP
1471459 Oct 2004 EP
1517228 Mar 2005 EP
1550940 Jun 2005 EP
1611503 Jan 2006 EP
1674977 Jun 2006 EP
1 297 488 Nov 2006 EP
1741186 Jan 2007 EP
1766501 Mar 2007 EP
1830248 Sep 2007 EP
1877893 Jan 2008 EP
2279823 Sep 2007 ES
1575420 Sep 1980 GB
2176282 May 1986 GB
2204126 Nov 1988 GB
2263765 Aug 1993 GB
57-211637 Dec 1982 JP
61-196317 Aug 1986 JP
61-260322 Nov 1986 JP
62-005428 Jan 1987 JP
63-223819 Sep 1988 JP
3-054618 Mar 1991 JP
03-244017 Oct 1991 JP
4-350715 Dec 1992 JP
4-355815 Dec 1992 JP
5-181605 Jul 1993 JP
5-189137 Jul 1993 JP
5-197810 Aug 1993 JP
06-110608 Apr 1994 JP
7-110733 Apr 1995 JP
7-230352 Aug 1995 JP
8-016931 Feb 1996 JP
8-108689 Apr 1996 JP
8-240407 Sep 1996 JP
8-315152 Nov 1996 JP
9-091094 Apr 1997 JP
9-224111 Aug 1997 JP
9-319501 Dec 1997 JP
10-105324 Apr 1998 JP
10-222646 Aug 1998 JP
11-051644 Feb 1999 JP
11-064026 Mar 1999 JP
11-085376 Mar 1999 JP
11-110116 Apr 1999 JP
11-203042 Jul 1999 JP
11-212692 Aug 1999 JP
2000-105671 Apr 2000 JP
2000-132340 May 2000 JP
2001-075735 Mar 2001 JP
2001-142642 May 2001 JP
2001-282456 Oct 2001 JP
2001-282457 Oct 2001 JP
2002-055770 Feb 2002 JP
2002-236547 Aug 2002 JP
2003-65716 Mar 2003 JP
2003-158597 May 2003 JP
2003-167669 Jun 2003 JP
2003-173237 Jun 2003 JP
2005-108211 Apr 2005 JP
2005-182423 Jul 2005 JP
2005-202950 Jul 2005 JP
9807112 Feb 1998 WO
9908897 Feb 1999 WO
9921122 Apr 1999 WO
9928812 Jun 1999 WO
9940562 Aug 1999 WO
0124157 Apr 2001 WO
0131570 May 2001 WO
0163550 Aug 2001 WO
0191043 Nov 2001 WO
0203316 Jan 2002 WO
0207073 Jan 2002 WO
0227461 Apr 2002 WO
03104887 Dec 2003 WO
03105074 Dec 2003 WO
2004072843 Aug 2004 WO
2004090706 Oct 2004 WO
2004102523 Nov 2004 WO
2004104810 Dec 2004 WO
2005031554 Apr 2005 WO
2005034027 Apr 2005 WO
2005106775 Nov 2005 WO
2005107072 Nov 2005 WO
2006002544 Jan 2006 WO
2006092058 Sep 2006 WO
2006095320 Sep 2006 WO
2006096962 Sep 2006 WO
2006116869 Nov 2006 WO
2007003196 Jan 2007 WO
2007019600 Feb 2007 WO
2007037809 Apr 2007 WO
2007064804 Jun 2007 WO
2007079590 Jul 2007 WO
2007132033 Nov 2007 WO
2007134456 Nov 2007 WO
2008128096 Oct 2008 WO
2009029764 Mar 2009 WO
2009029767 Mar 2009 WO
2009146544 Dec 2009 WO
2010051633 May 2010 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (71)
Entry
English Translation of Decision of Rejection for Japanese Patent Application No. 2002-507309, date of Decision: Aug. 18, 2011, 9 pages.
International Preliminary Report on Patentability, PCT/NZ2004/000029, May 20, 2005 (21 pages).
International Preliminary Report on Patentability, PCT/US2008/060102, Oct. 22, 2009 (9 pages).
International Search Report for PCT/CA2010/001085 mailed Oct. 12, 2010 (5 pages).
International Application U.S. Appl. No. PCT/US2008/060102, Search Report & Written opinion mailed Feb. 12, 2009 (14 pages).
International Application Serial No. PCT/US2008/074749, Search Report & Written Opinion mailed Feb. 11, 2009 (10 pages).
International Application Serial No. PCT/US2008/074755, International Search Report and Written Opinion mailed Jan. 29, 2009 (14 pages).
International Search Report for PCT/NZ05/00092 Sep. 27, 2006 (4 pages).
Loinaz et al., “A 200-mW, 3.3-V, CMOS Color Camera IC Producing 352×288 24-B Video at 30 Frames/s,” IEEE Journal of Solid-StateCircuits,vol. 31,No. 12,Dec. 1998, pp. 2092-2103.
Yawcheng Lo, “Solid-state image sensor: technologies and applications,” Input/Output and Imaging Technologies, Y.T. Tsai, T-M. Kung, and J. Larsen, eds. SPIE Proceedings vol. 3422, pp. 70-80 (1998).
Touch Panel, vol. 5 No. 2-3 (Sep. 2010).
Touch Panel, vol. 5 No. 4 (Nov. 2010).
“Store Window Presentations”, Heddier Electronic.
“ThruGlass”, Projected Capacitive Touchscreencs Specifications, Micro Touch.
Benko, et al., “Precise Selection Techniques for Multi-Touch Screens”, Proc. ACM CHI 2006: Human Factors in Computer Systems, pp. 1263-1272.
Buxton, W., “Issues and Techniques in Touch-Sensitive Tablet Input,” Computer Graphics, 19(3), Proceedings of SIGGRAPH '85, 1985, pp. 215-223.
VGA-format CMOS Camera-on-a-Chip for Multimedia Applications, Photobit Corporation, 1999 (2 pages).
“White Paper”, Digital Vision Touch Technology, Feb. 2003.
International Search Report for PCT/CA2008/001350 mailed Oct. 17, 2008 (5 Pages).
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/CA2007/002184 mailed Mar. 13, 2008 (13 Pages).
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/CA2004/001759 mailed Feb. 21, 2005 (7 Pages).
International Search Report for PCT/CA01/00980 mailed Oct. 22, 2001 (3 Pages).
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/CA2009/000773 mailed Aug. 12, 2009 (11 Pages).
European Search Opinion for EP 07 25 0888 dated Jun. 22, 2007 (2 pages).
European Search Report for EP 07 25 0888 dated Jun. 22, 20067 (2 pages).
European Search Report for EP 06 01 9269 dated Nov. 9, 2006 (4 pages).
European Search Report for EP 06 01 9268 dated Nov. 9, 2006 (4 pages).
European Search Report for EP 04 25 1392 dated Jan. 11, 2007 (2 pages).
European Search Report for EP 02 25 3594 dated Dec. 14, 2005 (3 pages).
Partial European Search Report for EP 03 25 7166 dated May 19, 2006 (4 pages).
May 12, 2009 Office Action for Canadian Patent Application No. 2,412,878 (4 pages).
Förstner, Wolfgang, “On Estimating Rotations”, Festschrift für Prof. Dr. -Ing. Heinrich Ebner Zum 60. Geburtstag, Herausg.: C. Heipke und H. Mayer, Lehrstuhl für Photogrammetrie und Fernerkundung, TU München, 1999, 12 pages. (http://www.ipb.uni-bonn.de/papers/#1999).
Funk, Bud K., CCD's in optical panels deliver high resolution, Electronic Design, Sep. 27, 1980, pp. 139-143.
Hartley, R. and Zisserman, A., “Multiple View Geometry in Computer Vision”, Cambridge University Press, First published 2000, Reprinted (with corrections) 2001, pp. 70-73, 92-93, and 98-99.
Kanatani, K., “Camera Calibration”, Geometric Computation for Machine Vision, Oxford Engineering Science Series, vol. 37, 1993, pp. 56-63.
Tapper, C.C., et al., “On-Line Handwriting Recognition—A Survey”, Proceedings of the International Conference on Pattern Recognition (ICPR), Rome, Nov. 14-17, 1988, Washington, IEEE Comp. Soc. Press. US, vol. 2 Conf. 9, Nov. 14, 1988, pp. 1123-1132.
Wang, F., et al., “Stereo camera calibration without absolute world coordinate information”, SPIE, vol. 2620, pp. 655-662, Jun. 14, 1995.
Wrobel, B., “minimum Solutions for Orientation”, Calibration and Orientation of Cameras in Computer Vision, Springer Series in Information Sciences, vol. 34, 2001, pp. 28-33.
Press Release, “IntuiLab introduces IntuiFace, An interactive table and its application platform” Nov. 30, 2007.
Overview page for IntuiFace by IntuiLab, Copyright 2008.
NASA Small Business Innovation Research Program: Composite List of Projects 1983-1989, Aug. 1990.
Touch Panel, vol. 1 No. 1 (2005).
Touch Panel, vol. 1 No. 2 (2005).
Touch Panel, vol. 1 No. 3 (2006).
Touch Panel, vol. 1 No. 4 (2006).
Touch Panel, vol. 1 No. 5 (2006).
Touch Panel, vol. 1 No. 6 (2006).
Touch Panel, vol. 1 No. 7 (2006).
Touch Panel, vol. 1 No. 8 (2006).
Touch Panel, vol. 1 No. 9 (2006).
Touch Panel, vol. 1 No. 10 (2006).
Touch Panel, vol. 2 No. 1 (2006).
Touch Panel, vol. 2 No. 2 (2007).
Touch Panel, vol. 2 No. 3 (2007).
Touch Panel, vol. 2 No. 4 (2007).
Touch Panel, vol. 2 No. 5 (2007).
Touch Panel, vol. 2 No. 6 (2007).
Touch Panel, vol. 2 No. 7-8 (2008).
Touch Panel, vol. 2 No. 9-10 (2008).
Touch Panel, vol. 3 No. 1-2 (2008).
Touch Panel, vol. 3 No. 3-4 (2008).
Touch Panel, vol. 3 No. 5-6 (2009).
Touch Panel, vol. 3 No. 7-8 (2009).
Touch Panel, vol. 3 No. 9 (2009).
Touch Panel, vol. 4 No. 2-3 (2009).
Transmittal; International Search Report; and Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority for International Application No. PCT/CA2009/000643.
Jul. 5, 2010 Office Action, with English translation, for Japanese Patent Application No. 2005-000268 (6 pages).
Villamor et al. “Touch Gesture Reference Guide”, Apr. 15, 2010.
Office Action for Mexican Patent Application No. MX/a/20120/012263 with a Feb. 20, 2012 cover letter summarizing the office action in English.
Chinese Office Action dated Sep. 3, 2012.
Supplementary European Search Report for European Patent Application No. 09 74 1639 with a completion date of Oct. 22, 2012.
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20090277694 A1 Nov 2009 US