Head mounted displays (HMDs) for virtual reality, and more recently augmented reality, were first developed as early as the 1660's and have been improved upon in waves of technological development. The basic purpose of a HMD is to exploit the stereo nature of human visual perception to create a virtual 3D environment. The general approach employed by many current HMDs consists of a stereo pair of displays (LCD, LED, OLED, etc.) with an eyepiece lens disposed in front of each display, proximal to the eye of the user. The purpose of the eyepiece lenses is to create a virtual stereo 3D image from the displays, which appears to be located at a comfortable distance in front of the user's eyes so as to reduce eye strain. The effect of seeing a stereo 3D image is predominantly based on two physiological cues, stereopsis and vergence. Stereopsis is the difference between the scenes viewed by each eye, and vergence is the pointing of the eyes so that both are looking at the same point in space, or fixation point. The primary limitation to this type of display system is its failure to provide a third important physiological depth cue, accommodation. Accommodation is associated with the change in optical power of the human eye. As a person looks at objects which are different distances away, their eyes “accommodate” so that the objects they are looking at are in focus. In current typical HMDs, the user's eyes aren't provided cues to change accommodation and therefore are statically focused on the virtual image plane of the display, located at a fixed distance from the user as viewed through the eyepiece lenses. Virtual images which provide stereopsis and vergence, but not accommodation, may present a mismatch or ambiguity of visual depth cues to the user. This mismatch may cause a reduction in realism of the displayed image (in large part because all objects being displayed appear to be “in focus” regardless of distance from the user). Additionally, the user may suffer eye strain as the eyes are being forced to respond to the displayed imagery in an unnatural way, without the physiological function of accommodation.
Aspects of the present disclosure overcome the limitations of existing technology by enabling HMDs with accurate accommodation depth cues, providing more realistic imagery and more comfortable use. According to an aspect of the present disclosure, an HMD for virtual reality or augmented reality applications uses variable focus lenses to provide accurate accommodation cues. In some embodiments the system may also include eye tracking capability to determine the proper focal power of the variable focus lenses.
Objects and advantages of aspects of the present disclosure will become apparent upon reading the following detailed description and upon reference to the accompanying drawings in which:
Although the following detailed description contains many specific details for the purposes of illustration, anyone of ordinary skill in the art will appreciate that many variations and alterations to the following details are within the scope of the invention. Accordingly, the aspects of the disclosure described below are set forth without any loss of generality to, and without imposing limitations upon, the claimed invention.
In the following detailed description, reference is made to the accompanying drawings, which form a part hereof, and in which is shown by way of illustration specific embodiments in which the invention may be practiced. In this regard, directional terminology, such as “top,” “bottom,” “front,” “back,” “first,” “second,” etc., is used with reference to the orientation of the figure(s) being described. Because components of embodiments of the present invention can be positioned in a number of different orientations, the directional terminology is used for purposes of illustration and is in no way limiting. It is to be understood that other embodiments may be utilized and structural or logical changes may be made without departing from the scope of the present invention. The following detailed description, therefore, is not to be taken in a limiting sense, and the scope of the present invention is defined by the appended claims.
By way of example, and not by way of limitation, the clear aperture of a lens in most lens drawings refers to the full diameter of the lens through which light can pass.
While the above is a complete description of the preferred embodiment of the present invention, it is possible to use various alternatives, modifications and equivalents. Therefore, the scope of the present invention should be determined not with reference to the above description but should, instead, be determined with reference to the appended claims, along with their full scope of equivalents. In the claims that follow, the indefinite article “A”, or “An” refers to a quantity of one or more of the item following the article, except where expressly stated otherwise. The appended claims are not to be interpreted as including means-plus-function limitations, unless such a limitation is explicitly recited in a given claim using the phrase “means for.” Any feature described herein, whether preferred or not, may be combined with any other feature, whether preferred or not.
This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 15/495,463 filed Apr. 24, 2017, the entire contents of which are incorporated herein by reference for all purposes. U.S. patent application Ser. No. 15/495,463 claims the priority benefit of U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 62/326,677 filed Apr. 22, 2016, the entire contents of which are incorporated herein by reference for all purposes.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
7672059 | Batchko et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
8064142 | Batchko et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8503875 | Szilagyi et al. | Aug 2013 | B2 |
8559115 | Szilagyi et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8605361 | Batchko et al. | Dec 2013 | B2 |
9164202 | Batchko et al. | Oct 2015 | B2 |
9341843 | Border | May 2016 | B2 |
9500782 | Batchko et al. | Nov 2016 | B2 |
9846306 | Schowengerdt | Dec 2017 | B2 |
20080259471 | Chen et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20100128358 | Szilagyi | May 2010 | A1 |
20120235886 | Border et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20160109705 | Schowengerdt | Apr 2016 | A1 |
20170336637 | Van Heugten | Nov 2017 | A1 |
20190011612 | Mastrangelo et al. | Jan 2019 | A1 |
Entry |
---|
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 15/495,463, dated Apr. 22, 2020. |
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 15/495,463, dated Jun. 14, 2019. |
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 15/495,463, dated Oct. 1, 2019. |
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 15/495,463, dated Oct. 16, 2018. |
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 15/495,463, dated Sep. 17, 2020. |
Notice of Allowance dated Jan. 21, 2021 for U.S. Appl. No. 15/495,463. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
62326677 | Apr 2016 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 15495463 | Apr 2017 | US |
Child | 17323738 | US |