The present disclosure generally relates to an interbody spacer for spinal fusion.
Spinal fusion is a surgical procedure used to correct problems with vertebrae of the spine. Spinal fusion fuses together the painful vertebrae so that they heal into a single, solid bone. In one method, the intervertebral disc between two vertebrae is removed and a small interbody spacer, also known as a cage, is inserted between the vertebrae. These interbody spacers usually contain bone graft material to promote bone healing and facilitate the fusion. After the interbody spacer is inserted, surgeons often use metal screws, plates, and rods to further stabilize the spine. Two common spinal fusion procedures are posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) and transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF). The type of interbody spacer is dependent on the type of fusion procedure being performed.
In one aspect, an interbody spacer for spinal fusion surgery generally comprises first and second opposite longitudinal end portions. A longitudinal axis of the interbody spacer extends through the first and second opposite end portions. First and second opposite side walls extend longitudinally between and interconnect the first and second longitudinal end portions. The first and second opposite side walls define a width of the interbody spacer therebetween. Upper and lower faces are at respective upper and lower portions of the corresponding first and second opposite longitudinal end portions and first and second opposite side walls. The upper and lower faces define a height of the interbody spacer therebetween. An interior cavity is defined by the first and second opposite longitudinal end portions and the first and second opposite side walls. The interior cavity extends through the upper and lower faces. Each of the first and second opposite side walls includes open-cell metal foam at the upper and lower faces, and a three-dimensional lattice disposed between the open-cell metal foam at the upper and lower faces. The open-cell metal foam is in communication with the three-dimensional lattice so that bone growth can enter the three-dimensional lattice from the open-cell metal foam.
In another aspect, a method of forming the interbody spacer set forth above generally comprises forming the interbody spacer as a monolithic, one-piece component by additive manufacturing process.
Corresponding reference characters indicate corresponding parts throughout the drawings.
As used herein, “open-cell metal foam” is a porous structural component having a relatively roughened surface, an apparent randomized filament arrangement, and cell sizes and shapes forming an interconnected network or labyrinth to facilitate bone in-growth.
As used herein, a “three-dimensional lattice” is a porous structural component including non-randomized, intersecting struts forming patterns of interconnected passages to facilitate bone growth.
Referring to
The first and second longitudinal end portions 12, 14 comprise generally solid bodies (e.g., titanium or other metal or other material) to enhance the structurally integrity (e.g., compressive strength) of the spacer at the longitudinal end portions. The illustrated first and second longitudinal end portions 12, 14 also comprise open-cell metal foam 26 (e.g., titanium or other metal) on the interior surface of the solid bodies and partially defining the interior cavity 24 to enhance bone growth. The open-cell metal foam 26 extends along the entire heights and widths of the interior surfaces of the longitudinal end portions 12, 14 (i.e., the open-cell metal foam covers entireties of the interior surfaces of the longitudinal end portions). It is understood that the longitudinal end portions 12, 14 may not include the open-cell metal foam 26 and may be of other constructions. The first longitudinal end portion 12 defines a tool-receiving opening 28 extending longitudinally from an exterior of the interbody spacer 10. The tool-receiving opening 28, which may be threaded as illustrated, is configured to receive a suitable insertion tool for use in inserting the interbody spacer 10 in the patient. Tool-receiving grooves 30 are formed in the first longitudinal end portion 12 on opposite sides of the tool-receiving opening 28 for receiving jaws of a suitable insertion tool. The interbody spacer 10 may include other features for use with a suitable insertion tool. The second longitudinal end 14 portion has a bullet-nose shape to facilitate insertion of the interbody spacer 10 in the patient. The second longitudinal end portion 14 may be of other configurations.
The first and second side walls 16, 18 include rows of teeth 34 at the upper and lower faces 20, 22. The rows of teeth 34 extend longitudinally adjacent the outer margins (i.e., outer perimeter) of the upper and lower faces 22, 24 relative to the central axis of the interior cavity 24. That is, the first and second side walls 16, 18 are serrated at the upper and lower faces 22, 24 adjacent the outer margins of the upper and lower faces. Each tooth 34 extends in a direction generally toward the first longitudinal end 12. The rows of teeth 34 facilitate anchoring of the interbody spacer 10 to the adjacent vertebrae within the interbody space to inhibit movement of the interbody spacer within the space. In other embodiments, the interbody spacer 10 may include other features to facilitate anchoring and inhibit movement of the interbody spacer within interbody space.
As shown in
As shown in
In general, the open area or porosity of each 3D lattice 40 (and thus each side wall 16, 18) increases from adjacent the exterior surface of the corresponding side wall toward its interior surface of the corresponding side wall. Relatedly, the structural integrity (i.e., the compressive strength) of each 3D lattice 40 (and thus each side wall 16, 18) increases from adjacent the interior surface of the corresponding side wall toward the exterior surface of the corresponding side wall because there is less open area and more structure adjacent the exterior surface compared to the interior surface. In this way, there is more open area within each side wall 16, 18 for bone growth at a location adjacent the interior cavity 24 and there is more compressive strength to absorb compressive force adjacent the exterior surface of the interbody spacer 10.
In the illustrated embodiment, the transverse passages 52 are arranged in longitudinal and heightwise rows extending longitudinally and heightwise of the corresponding side wall 16, 18, respectively. A single transverse passage 52 is shaded in
In the illustrated embodiment, the heightwise passages 54 are arranged in rows extending longitudinally and transversely along the corresponding side wall 16, 18. A single heightwise passage 54 is shaded in
In the illustrated embodiment, the longitudinal passages 56 are arranged in rows extending heightwise and transversely along the corresponding side wall 12, 14. A single longitudinal passage 56 is shaded in
In the illustrated embodiment, the 3D lattices 40 comprise interconnected structural strut members 62. The strut members 62 are connected to one another at nodes 68. In the illustrated embodiment, eight strut members 62 are connected at one node 68 (i.e., eight strut members connect to a single node). The non-randomized arrangement and configurations of the strut members 62 define the pattern of intersecting passages extending through the side walls 16, 18. In the illustrated embodiment, the strut members 62 adjacent the exterior of each side wall 16, 18 have cross-sectional dimensions (e.g., cross-sectional areas) greater than the cross-sectional dimensions (e.g., cross-sectional areas) of the strut members adjacent the interior of the corresponding side wall. As shown in
The interbody spacer 10 may be integrally formed as a one-piece monolithic component. For example, the entirety of the interbody spacer 10 may be formed by additive manufacturing, such as by direct metal laser sintering or by electron beam melting processes, as is generally known. The interbody spacer 10 may be formed entirely from a single type of metal, such as titanium, or the interbody spacer may comprise more than one type of metal. The interbody spacer 10 may be formed in other ways.
In use, the interior cavity 24 may be packed with bone graft material and then inserted within an interbody space between two adjacent vertebrae in a suitable surgical procedure such that the upper face 20 of the spacer 10 contacts the upper or superior vertebra and the lower face of the spacer contacts the lower or inferior vertebra. In this position, the upper and lower teeth 34 anchor into the respective superior and inferior vertebrae, and the open-cell metal foam 26 at the upper and lower faces 20, 22 are in close proximity and/or are contacting the respective superior and inferior vertebrae. After insertion of the spacer 10 and completion of the surgery, it is envisioned that bone from the adjacent vertebrae will grow into the porous open-cell metal foam 26 of the first and second walls 16, 18 at the upper and lower faces 20, 22. Further in-growth into the open-cell metal foam 26 will lead the bone growth into the 3D lattices 40 of the first and second side walls 18, 20 because the open-cell metal foam is in communication with the transverse, heightwise, and longitudinal passages 52, 54, 56 of the 3D lattice 40. Further bone growth into the 3D lattice 40 will occur, particularly (it is believed) into the more open porous interior spaces of the first and second side walls 16, 18 where the 3D lattice is more porous. It is believed such enhanced bone growth into the interbody spacer 10 by way of the open-cell metal foam 26 and the porous 3D lattice 40 promotes bone growth of the vertebrae and enhances fusion of the patient's spine, as is desired in such fusion surgery.
Referring to
One difference between this TLIF interbody spacer 110 and the PLIF interbody spacer 10 is that the TLIF interbody spacer is curved along its length, such that the first and second side walls 116, 118 have arcuate shapes along their respective lengths. The first side wall 116 has a longitudinal axis that is an inner arc compared to the longitudinal axis of the second side wall 118 such that the longitudinal axis of the first side wall has a larger radius of curvature compared to the longitudinal axis of the second side wall. As shown in
Another difference between this TLIF interbody spacer 110 and the PLIF interbody spacer 10 is that one or more of the transverse, longitudinal, and heightwise passages 152, 154, 156 of the first side wall 116 have different cross-sectional shapes and/or cross-sectional sizes (e.g., cross-sectional areas) than the corresponding passages 152, 154, 156 of the second side wall 118. In particular, the cross-sectional shapes of the transverse (or radial) passages 152 of the first side wall 116 is generally diamond-shaped and have larger cross-sectional areas, while the cross-sectional shapes of the transverse (or radial) passages of the second side wall 118 is generally oval or oblong-shaped and have smaller cross-sectional areas. The differences in the transverse passages 152 and/or the other passages of the first and second walls 116, 118 is due to the fact that it is believed that the first side wall, being the radially outer side wall, will take on more of a compressive load when properly positioned in the interbody space 110. Thus, the first side wall 116 is designed to provide more structural support (e.g., have more compressive strength) than the second side wall 118. Relatedly, the second side wall 118 will be more porous and have more percentage of open area than the first side wall 116.
Yet another difference between this TLIF interbody spacer 110 and the PLIF interbody spacer 10 is that the row of teeth 134 on the first side wall 116 (the radially outer side wall) are smoother or more blunt (i.e., the edges of the teeth are less sharp or pointed) than the row of teeth on the second side wall 118. The outer radius of the teeth 134 on the first side wall 116 is also more rounded and less sharp than the outer radius of the teeth on the second side wall 118. These features facilitate insertion of the TLIF interbody spacer 110 during the TLIF procedure. The teeth 134 on the first side wall 116 is more likely to come into contact with tissue (e.g., a nerve) during insertion, and therefore, by smoothing the teeth it is less likely that the teeth with puncture, cut and/or tear tissue during insertion.
The TLIF interbody spacer 110 may be integrally formed as a one-piece monolithic component. For example, the entirety of the interbody spacer 110 may be formed by additive manufacturing, such as by direct metal laser sintering or by electron beam melting processes, as is generally known. The interbody spacer 110 may be formed entirely from a single type of metal, such as titanium, or the interbody spacer may comprise more than one type of metal. The interbody spacer 110 may be formed in other ways.
In use, the TLIF interbody spacer 110 may be implanted in the patient in a suitable manner. It is believed the TLIF interbody spacer 110 promotes bone ingrowth in the same manner as described above with respect to the PLIF interbody spacer 10.
Modifications and variations of the disclosed embodiments are possible without departing from the scope of the invention defined in the appended claims.
When introducing elements of the present invention or the embodiment(s) thereof, the articles “a”, “an”, “the” and “said” are intended to mean that there are one or more of the elements. The terms “comprising”, “including” and “having” are intended to be inclusive and mean that there may be additional elements other than the listed elements.
As various changes could be made in the above constructions, products, and methods without departing from the scope of the invention, it is intended that all matter contained in the above description and shown in the accompanying drawings shall be interpreted as illustrative and not in a limiting sense.
This application is a continuation of U.S. Non-Provisional application Ser. No. 16/722,090, filed Dec. 20, 2019, which claim is a continuation of U.S. Non-Provisional application Ser. No. 15/792,140, filed Oct. 24, 2017, Issued as U.S. Ser. No. 10/512,545 on Dec. 24, 2019, which claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application No. 62/412,091, filed Oct. 24, 2016, the entire contents of each of which are incorporated herein by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4834757 | Brantigan | May 1989 | A |
4863476 | Shepperd | Sep 1989 | A |
5171278 | Pisharodi | Dec 1992 | A |
5282861 | Kaplan | Feb 1994 | A |
5702449 | McKay | Dec 1997 | A |
20030009227 | Lambrecht | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030040802 | Errico | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030065396 | Michelson | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030105527 | Bresina | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030109933 | Weissman | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030135276 | Eckman | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030153985 | Lee | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030158553 | Michelson | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20040019386 | Ferree | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040034351 | Sherman | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040059418 | McKay | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20050112397 | Rolfe | May 2005 | A1 |
20060241765 | Burn | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060241776 | Brown | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20070118229 | Bergin | May 2007 | A1 |
20070198021 | Wales | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070219634 | Greenhalgh | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20080077247 | Murillo | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080124766 | Kuboki | May 2008 | A1 |
20090048675 | Bhatnagar et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20100198353 | Pope | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20110125284 | Gabbrielli et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
20120316650 | Ullrich, Jr. et al. | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20130030529 | Hunt | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20140107786 | Geisler et al. | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20150018956 | Steinmann et al. | Jan 2015 | A1 |
20160158023 | Klimek | Jun 2016 | A1 |
20170173225 | Troxel | Jun 2017 | A1 |
20170266007 | Gelaude et al. | Sep 2017 | A1 |
20180110624 | Arnone | Apr 2018 | A1 |
20180289496 | Zappacosta et al. | Oct 2018 | A1 |
20180338838 | Cryder et al. | Nov 2018 | A1 |
20190038428 | Stauffer | Feb 2019 | A1 |
20190053907 | Gregersen et al. | Feb 2019 | A1 |
20190083270 | Milz et al. | Mar 2019 | A1 |
20190142601 | Ashleigh | May 2019 | A1 |
20190175354 | Knox et al. | Jun 2019 | A1 |
20190224023 | Howard et al. | Jul 2019 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
105559950 | May 2016 | CN |
2017191223 | Nov 2017 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20220346958 A1 | Nov 2022 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
62412091 | Oct 2016 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 16722090 | Dec 2019 | US |
Child | 17664150 | US | |
Parent | 15792140 | Oct 2017 | US |
Child | 16722090 | US |