The present invention relates to a multi-section utility pole and more particularly to a hollow, centrifugally cast, iron utility pole member having a tapered exterior and variable wall thickness for providing a shortened press-fit, slip joint between interconnected pole members.
The oldest known method in the art of utility pole construction is the use of wooden poles, such as those commonly used for telephone lines. However, many modern utility pole uses require longer lengths than are practical, or even possible, with wood, and wood poles are highly susceptible to rot, insect infestation, bird attack and high winds. Additionally, construction of wooden poles requires that the pole be of one piece of uncut wood which creates difficulties in transporting and erecting long poles. To overcome the shortcomings of wood utility poles, solid concrete poles are often used. Concrete utility poles, however, are expensive to produce, heavy and require special heavy duty equipment to load, transport, unload and install. Further, the greater weight of concrete poles precludes the use of very long poles. Metal poles have long served as an alternative to wood and concrete utility poles. Metal poles are relatively strong and capable of being constructed in sections for ease of transportation and erection. The widespread use of metal poles however has been limited since steel poles are expensive to produce and aluminum alloy utility poles do not have sufficient strength to be used in high lateral force environments.
More recently, the concept of using ductile iron for utility pole construction has been suggested. It is believed that ductile iron utility poles will provide a virtually maintenance free, extremely long life, low cost utility pole. An exemplary ductile iron utility pole is disclosed in U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2008/0023172 A2 to Waugh. The pole is a centrifugally cast utility pole having a tapered exterior and a substantially uniform wall thickness along the long axis of the pole. Additionally, U.S. Pat. No. 5,784,851 to Waugh discloses a hollow, centrifugally cast, utility pole having tapered external linear dimensions. The pole is formed utilizing conventional centrifugal casting methods wherein a tapered mold is used to impart a tapered shape to the pole. The use of the tapered mold during the casting operation also provides for a gradually increasing pole wall thickness along the entire length of the pole from the top of the pole to its butt.
Metal utility poles such as the centrifugally cast poles described above are fabricated to provide for a press-fit, slip joint at the butt of the poles which allows the poles to be interconnected with other similarly cast poles for extended height. Such joints however possess several shortcomings. For a conventional press-fit, slip joint between hollow metal pole members, the standard joint length L is about 1.5 times as large as the inner diameter D of the butt of the pole (L/D=1.5). At this joint length, the strength of the joint between pole members is lower than the strength of the remainder of the poles. Further, in order to make the strength of the joint equal to that of the main body of the poles, the joint length must be increased to about twice as large as the inner diameter of the pole (L/D=2.0). However, if the joint length is made about twice as large, the weight of the metal at the joint increases by about 25 percent. Consequently, the cost of manufacturing the pole increases. Lastly, a joint length where L/D=1.5 equates to a large overlap between interconnected pole members, and thus a large amount of wasted utility pole length.
The present invention is directed to a metal utility pole and in particular to a hollow, centrifugally cast, ductile iron utility pole member having a tapered exterior and variable wall thickness for providing a shortened press-fit, slip joint between interconnected pole members. The shortened joint length requires less metal than conventional press-fit, slip joints while maintaining or improving the overall strength of the joint. This is accomplished by increasing the wall thickness of one or both interconnected pole members along the joint relative to the wall thickness of the body or mid-section of the pole members. This occurs by increasing the pole member wall thickness along the bottom end or butt of a pole member, the top end of the member or both.
a is a sectional view of a slip joint formed between two of the utility pole members of
a is a sectional view of a slip joint formed between two of the utility pole members of
b is a sectional view of the utility pole of
a is a sectional view of a slip joint formed between two of the utility pole member of
b is a sectional view of the utility pole of
It has been found that by providing pole members 12 with a variable wall thickness, as specifically described herein, the joint length L between interconnected pole members 12 can be shortened while decreasing the amount of metal at the joint. It has also been found that the slip joints of the present invention, having a shortened joint length L, exhibit a joint strength that is substantially equal to or greater than conventional slip joint strengths between similarly designed metal pole members. In particular, according to the present invention, the strength along a slip joint can be maintained, i.e., be substantially equal to that of a similar joint having where joint length L is 1.5 times the inner diameter of the bottom end section, when the joint length L between interconnected pole members 12 is less than 1.2 times an inner diameter of the bottom end section 14 forming the joint. A preferred joint length, according to the present invention, is between 1.1 to 0.6 times the inner diameter of bottom end section 14, and a more preferred joint length L is between 1.0 and 0.8 times the inner diameter of bottom end section 14.
The decreased joint length L of the present invention is accomplished by increasing the wall thickness of one or both interconnected pole members 12 along the joint relative to the wall thickness of a midsection 20 of pole members 12. As depicted in
More particularly,
In certain instances, it may be preferred that press fit, slip joint 24 formed between bottom end section 14 and top end section 16 exhibits a precise or friction fit between sections 14 and 16. This requires that the inner surface of bottom end section 14 has a shape and diameter along the length thereof that are complimentary and nearly identical to the shape and diameter of the outer surface of top end section 16 along its length. To accomplish this arrangement, bottom end section 24 is initially cast to have an inner diameter along its length that it somewhat smaller than the outer diameter of top end section 16. In this configuration, top end section 16 would not fit into bottom end section 14 in manner to provide an operational joint. In order to configure bottom end section 14 in a manner to precisely receive top end section 16, bottom end section 14 is stretched so that its inner and outer diameters are increased proportionately. This is done by pressing a preformed member having a portion that includes sidewalls that are identical in shape, length and diameter to the shape, length and diameter of the outer surface of top end section 16 into bottom end section 14 thereby imparting the exterior shape and diameter of the member to the inner surface of bottom end section 14. In particular, the preformed member is inserted into bottom end section 14 immediately following the heating step of the annealing process during the manufacture of utility pole member 12. This is done using a hydraulic actuated rod that forces the member into bottom end section 14. As the member rides along the inner surface of bottom end section 14 and presses there against, bottom end section 14 is expanded or pushed outward such that the outer and inner diameters of bottom end section 14 are increased. This can cause a flaring of bottom end section 14. Once the preformed member is pressed into bottom end section 14 the appropriate distance for imparting to the inner surface of bottom end section 14 the desired shape and diameter, the member is retracted, and utility pole member 12 is cooled.
As will be apparent to one skilled in the art, various modifications can be made within the scope of the aforesaid description. Such modifications being within the ability of one skilled in the art form a part of the present invention and are embraced by the claims below. For example, in the event it is desired to provide a slip joint having a strength greater than found in conventional slip joints, joint length L can be increased to greater than 1.5 times the inner diameter of bottom end section 14. Additionally, when both top end section 16 and bottom end section 14 have a wall thickness that is greater than the wall thickness of midsection 20, they can have the same of different wall thicknesses. Also, for certain applications, it may be necessary for either top end section 16 or bottom end section 14 to have a wall thickness that is less than the midsection 20 wall thickness.
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 232360 | Milliken | Sep 1880 | A |
| 1344779 | Trammell | Jun 1920 | A |
| 1475090 | Taylor | Nov 1923 | A |
| 1567369 | Holst | Dec 1925 | A |
| 1781682 | Crotty | Nov 1930 | A |
| 1810091 | Siegle | Jun 1931 | A |
| 1870770 | De Witt | Aug 1932 | A |
| 2457908 | Meyerhoefer | Jan 1949 | A |
| 2679911 | Bhend | Jun 1954 | A |
| 3034209 | Bianca et al. | May 1962 | A |
| 3606403 | Medney | Sep 1971 | A |
| 3865498 | Okuto et al. | Feb 1975 | A |
| 3936206 | Meisberger | Feb 1976 | A |
| 4405398 | Rother et al. | Sep 1983 | A |
| 4436781 | Rother et al. | Mar 1984 | A |
| 4482173 | Rassieur | Nov 1984 | A |
| 4569617 | Schmidt et al. | Feb 1986 | A |
| 4769897 | Moseman | Sep 1988 | A |
| 5090837 | Mower | Feb 1992 | A |
| 5180195 | Petroff et al. | Jan 1993 | A |
| 5285614 | Fouad | Feb 1994 | A |
| 5704187 | Hosford et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
| 5784851 | Waugh | Jul 1998 | A |
| 6468003 | Merjan et al. | Oct 2002 | B2 |
| 7343718 | Foust et al. | Mar 2008 | B2 |
| 8245734 | Jahani et al. | Aug 2012 | B2 |
| 20030033281 | Ritz | Feb 2003 | A1 |
| 20040074199 | Gordin et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
| 20040211148 | Foust et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
| 20050017226 | Brittain et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
| 20080023172 | Waugh | Jan 2008 | A1 |
| 20080202622 | Cho et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |