This disclosure relates generally to integrated circuits and relates more particularly to interdigitated capacitors for use in integrated circuit technology.
Passive electronic components such as capacitors are often used in integrated circuit (IC) applications. One particular type of capacitor is an interdigitated capacitor. A conventional interdigitated capacitor comprises a plurality of interdigitated layers, where each pair of interdigitated layers is separated by an oxide layer (or oxide region). Each interdigitated layer comprises two bars (or interconnects) which are positioned substantially parallel to each other. Extending from each of the bars is a plurality of “digits” (i.e., long conductors). The digits are spaced along the bars such that the digits collectively form an interlocked or interdigitated structure.
Conventional interdigitated capacitors suffer from some drawbacks. For instance, the longer the length of the digits, the more current loss the digits tend to incur. As such, the length of the digits is typically selected to minimize such losses. For instance, multiple interdigitated layers having digits of shorter length typically span the area of the capacitor. Although this effectively minimizes losses, the capacitance density of the capacitor is lowered as a result. In turn, each of the interdigitated layers will require two electrodes in order to provide the necessary capacitance density. These electrodes are located outside of the interdigitated structure and consume space in the areas of the bars and oxide layer. Thus, capacitor area is not utilized in a manner that maximizes performance.
An interdigitated capacitor having digits of varying width is disclosed. One embodiment of a capacitor includes a first plurality of conductive digits and a second plurality of conductive digits positioned in an interlocking manner with the first plurality of conductive digits, such that an interdigitated structure is formed. The first plurality of conductive digits and the second plurality of conductive digits collectively form a set of digits, where the width of a first digit in the set of digits is non-uniform with respect to a second digit in the set of digits.
In various embodiments of the capacitor, a first subset of the set of digits that is positioned closest to the ends of the interdigitated structure has widths that are wider than a second subset of the set of digits that is positioned closest to the center of the interdigitated structure. A first subset of the set of digits that is positioned closest to the ends of the interdigitated structure has widths that are three to five times wider than a second subset of the set of digits that is positioned closest to the center of the interdigitated structure. A first defined number of a subset of the set of digits that is positioned closest to the ends of the interdigitated structure has a first width, and a remainder of the digits in the set of digits has a second width that is narrower than the first width.
The width of each digit in the set of digits gradually tapers from a widest width at digits positioned at ends of the interdigitated structure to a narrowest width at a digit positioned at a center of the interdigitated structure. The relative widths of the digits in the set of digits are determined in accordance with a magnetic H field distribution of the interdigitated structure. The width of a particular one of the set of digits is proportional to the amount of current carried by the particular one of the set of digits. The gaps between the digits in the set of digits are substantially uniform in size. The first plurality of conductive digits and the second plurality of conductive digits are formed from at least one of: copper, doped polysilicon, aluminum, or titanium nitride. The first plurality of conductive digits is formed from a first material, and the second plurality of conductive digits is formed from a second material that is different from the first material. The capacitor further includes at least one bar having a feeding point that is coupled to the interdigitated structure; and a first subset of the set of digits that is positioned closest to the feeding point has widths that are wider than a remainder of the set of digits.
According to another embodiment, a method for forming a capacitor is provided. The method includes: forming a first plurality of conductive digits and forming a second plurality of conductive digits positioned in an interlocking manner with the first plurality of conductive digits, such that an interdigitated structure is formed. The first plurality of conductive digits and the second plurality of conductive digits collectively form a set of digits, where the width of a first digit in the set of digits is non-uniform with respect to a second digit in the set of digits.
In various embodiments of the method, a first subset of the set of digits that is positioned closest to the ends of the interdigitated structure has widths that are wider than a second subset of the set of digits that is positioned closest to the center of the interdigitated structure. A first subset of the set of digits that is positioned closest to the ends of the interdigitated structure has widths that are three to five times wider than a second subset of the set of digits that is positioned closest to the center of the interdigitated structure. A first defined number of a subset of the set of digits that is positioned closest to the ends of the interdigitated structure has a first width, and a remainder of the digits in the set of digits has a second width that is narrower than the first width.
The width of the digits in the set of digits gradually tapers from a widest width at the ends of the interdigitated structure to a narrowest width at the center of the interdigitated structure. The relative widths of the digits in the set of digits are determined in accordance with a magnetic H field distribution of the interdigitated structure, and the width of a particular one of the set of digits is proportional to the amount of current carried by the particular one of the set of digits. At least one bar having a feeding point is coupled to the interdigitated structure, and a first subset of the set of digits that is positioned closest to the feeding point has widths that are wider than a remainder of the set of digits.
According to another embodiment, a capacitor includes a single interdigitated layer, wherein the single interdigitated layer comprises a first plurality of conductive digits and a second plurality of conductive digits positioned in an interlocking manner. The first plurality of conductive digits and the second plurality of conductive digits are positioned such that an interdigitated structure is formed.
Accompanying drawings show exemplary embodiments in accordance with one or more aspects of the disclosure; however, the accompanying drawings should not be taken to limit the disclosure to the embodiments shown, but are for explanation and understanding only.
An interdigitated capacitor having digits of varying width is disclosed. As discussed above, an interdigitated capacitor is a particular type of capacitor that produces capacitor-like, high-pass characteristics using long conductors or “digits.” One embodiment of an interdigitated capacitor includes a plurality of digits, where those digits located closer to the ends of the interdigitated structure are wider than those digits located closer to the center of the interdigitated structure. In a further embodiment, the width of the digits gradually tapers from a widest point at the ends of the interdigitated structure to a narrowest point at the center of the interdigitated structure. As discussed in greater detail below, this arrangement allows the digits to be lengthened so that the interdigitated capacitor structure can be applied to the bar and oxide layers, while increasing the capacitance density of the interdigitated capacitor.
As illustrated, the capacitor 100 comprises a first bar 106 and a second bar 108, which are positioned substantially parallel to each other. Extending from each of the first bar 106 and the second bar 108 are a plurality of digits 1101-110n (hereinafter collectively referred to as “digits 110”). Collectively, the digits 110 form an interlocked or interdigitated structure 104. Current is provided to the interdigitated structure via at least one “feeding point” or electrode 1121-1122 (hereinafter collectively referred to as “electrodes 112”) located on the first bar 106 and the second bar 108. In one embodiment, each of the first bar 106 and the second bar 108 includes an electrode (broadly a feeding point) 112 for providing current. It should be noted that the feeding point located on the bars 106 and 108 can be deployed at any positions on the bars, e.g., at the extreme ends of the bars, at the center of the bars, and any other locations between the extreme ends and the center of the bars.
In one embodiment, the digits 110 are formed of a conductive material such as copper, doped polysilicon, aluminum, or titanium nitride, among other potential materials. The composition of the digits 110 extending from the first bar 106 may differ from the composition of the digits extending from the second bar 108. The gaps between the digits 110 and the bars 106, 108 generally comprise a dielectric material such as silicon dioxide.
As illustrated, the width of the digits 110 is non-uniform from digit to digit (e.g., at least two or more digits have different widths). For example, in one embodiment, the digits 110 that are located closer to the ends of the interdigitated structure 104 (e.g., digits 1101, 1102, 110n-1, and 110n) are wider than the digits that are located closer to the center of the interdigitated structure 104 (e.g., digits 110n-m-1 and 110n-m). In one embodiment in particular, the digits 110 that are located closer to the ends of the interdigitated structure 104 are three to five times wider than the digits that are located closer to the center of the interdigitated structure 104.
In another embodiment, a specified number of digits 110 located closer to the ends of the interdigitated structure 104 are wider than a remainder of the digits 110 in the interdigitated structure. For example, moving from the ends of the interdigitated structure 104 to the center of the interdigitated structure 104, the first x digits 110 have a first width, while the remaining digits 110 have a second width that is narrower than the first width.
In yet another embodiment, the widths of the digits 110 gradually taper from a widest width W1 at the ends of the interdigitated structure 104 to a narrowest width W2 at the center of the interdigitated structure 104, such that the widths of the digits 110 residing at the intermediate points of the interdigitated structure 104 (i.e., between the ends and the center) have widths somewhere between W1 and W2.
In another embodiment still, the relative widths of the digits 110 are determined in accordance with the magnetic H field distribution of the interdigitated structure 104.
Thus, in one embodiment, the digits 110 closer to the center of the interdigitated structure 104 (i.e., the digits 110 that carry the least current) are made the narrowest (e.g., as narrow as the mechanical tolerances of the interdigitated capacitor 100 will allow). As one moves outward from the center of the interdigitated structure 104, the digits 110 are made proportionally wider as they carry more current, with the widest digits 110 being the digits 110 located closest to the ends of the interdigitated structure 104. This arrangement will increase the capacitance density of the interdigitated capacitor 100.
In another embodiment, the widest digits 110 are located closest to the electrodes 112. For example, in the exemplary embodiment illustrated in
By way of further example,
In
In any of the above cases, the gaps G between the digits 110 remain substantially uniform. That is, although the widths of the digits 110 will vary, the size of the gaps G between the digits will not vary substantially.
As illustrated in
As illustrated, the capacitor 300 comprises a first bar 306 and a second bar 308, which are positioned substantially parallel to each other. Extending from each of the first bar 306 and the second bar 308 are a plurality of digits 3101-310n (hereinafter collectively referred to as “digits 310”). Collectively, the digits 310 form an interlocked or interdigitated structure 304.
In one embodiment, the digits 310 are formed of a conductive material such as copper, doped polysilicon, aluminum, or titanium nitride, among other potential materials. The composition of the digits 310 extending from the first bar 306 may differ from the composition of the digits extending from the second bar 308. The gaps between the digits 310 and the bars 306, 308 generally comprise a dielectric material such as silicon dioxide.
As illustrated, the width of the digits 310 is non-uniform from digit to digit (e.g., at least two or more digits have different widths). In one embodiment, the widths of the digits 310 may be varied in any of the manners discussed above. Additionally, the length of the digits 310 is also non-uniform from digit to digit (e.g., at least two or more digits have different lengths). For instance, the lengths of the digits 310 may vary from a longest length of L1 to a shortest length of L2. In one embodiment, the lengths of the digits 310 are varied based on any of the criteria discussed above for varying the widths of the digits 310.
The method 400 is started in step 402. In step 404, a first plurality of conductive digits is formed, in which the widths of the digits vary from digit to digit. Optionally, the lengths of the digits may also vary from digit to digit. In one embodiment, the widths (and optionally lengths) of the digits are varied according to any of the criteria discussed above. The first plurality of conductive digits is connected by a first bar from which the digits extend in a spaced-apart manner. In one embodiment, the first plurality of conductive digits is formed of a conductive material such as copper, doped polysilicon, aluminum, or titanium nitride, among other potential materials. Gaps between the digits in the first plurality of conductive digits generally comprise a dielectric material such as silicon dioxide.
In step 406, a second plurality of conductive digits is formed, in which the widths of the digits vary from digit to digit. Optionally, the lengths of the digits may also vary from digit to digit. In one embodiment, the widths (and optionally lengths) of the digits are varied according to any of the criteria discussed above. The second plurality of conductive digits is connected by a second bar from which the digits extend in a spaced-apart manner. In one embodiment, the second plurality of conductive digits is formed of a conductive material such as copper, doped polysilicon, aluminum, or titanium nitride, among other potential materials. The second plurality of conductive digits need not necessarily be formed from the same conductive material as the first plurality of conductive digits. Gaps between the digits in the second plurality of conductive digits generally comprise a dielectric material such as silicon dioxide.
In step 408, the first plurality of conductive digits and the second plurality of conductive digits are positioned to form an interdigitated structure. This interdigitated structure forms the main structure of an interdigitated capacitor, as discussed above. Those skilled in the art will appreciate that the final interdigitated capacitor may comprise additional components such as electrodes.
The method 400 then ends in step 410.
While the foregoing describes exemplary embodiments in accordance with one or more aspects of the present disclosure, other and further embodiments in accordance with the one or more aspects of the present disclosure may be devised without departing from the scope thereof, which is determined by the claims that follow and equivalents thereof. Claims listing steps do not imply any order of the steps. Trademarks are the property of their respective owners.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1899176 | Bailey | Feb 1933 | A |
3593319 | Barber | Jul 1971 | A |
4156249 | Koo | May 1979 | A |
4249196 | Durney et al. | Feb 1981 | A |
4409608 | Yoder | Oct 1983 | A |
4427457 | Carlson et al. | Jan 1984 | A |
4470096 | Guertin | Sep 1984 | A |
4470099 | Sawairi | Sep 1984 | A |
4571543 | Raymond et al. | Feb 1986 | A |
4639686 | Beckenbach et al. | Jan 1987 | A |
4700457 | Matsukawa | Oct 1987 | A |
4731696 | Himes et al. | Mar 1988 | A |
4827323 | Tigelaar et al. | May 1989 | A |
4831431 | Hanlon | May 1989 | A |
4878151 | Gallichio | Oct 1989 | A |
4914546 | Alter | Apr 1990 | A |
4937649 | Shiba et al. | Jun 1990 | A |
4994688 | Horiguchi et al. | Feb 1991 | A |
5005103 | Kwon et al. | Apr 1991 | A |
5021920 | Smith | Jun 1991 | A |
5077225 | Lee | Dec 1991 | A |
5083184 | Eguchi | Jan 1992 | A |
5089878 | Lee | Feb 1992 | A |
5117114 | Street et al. | May 1992 | A |
5119169 | Kozono et al. | Jun 1992 | A |
5142639 | Kohyama et al. | Aug 1992 | A |
5155658 | Inam et al. | Oct 1992 | A |
5166858 | Frake et al. | Nov 1992 | A |
5172299 | Yamada et al. | Dec 1992 | A |
5177410 | Hashiguchi et al. | Jan 1993 | A |
5189594 | Hoshiba | Feb 1993 | A |
5208725 | Akcasu | May 1993 | A |
5275974 | Ellul et al. | Jan 1994 | A |
5583359 | Ng et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5712813 | Zhang | Jan 1998 | A |
5868388 | Wood et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5939766 | Stolmeijer et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
6037621 | Wilson | Mar 2000 | A |
6064108 | Martinez | May 2000 | A |
6066537 | Poh | May 2000 | A |
6297524 | Vathulya et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6303456 | Pricer et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6303457 | Christensen et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6383858 | Gupta et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6385033 | Javanifard et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6410954 | Sowlati et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6417556 | Long et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6542351 | Kwang | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6570210 | Sowlati et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6597562 | Hu et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6625006 | Aram et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6653681 | Appel | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6661079 | Bikulcius | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6690570 | Hajimiri et al. | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6737698 | Paul et al. | May 2004 | B1 |
6747307 | Vathulya et al. | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6765778 | Du et al. | Jul 2004 | B1 |
6819542 | Tsai et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6822312 | Sowlati et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6880134 | Drennan | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6882015 | Bernstein et al. | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6897505 | Aton | May 2005 | B2 |
6903918 | Brennan | Jun 2005 | B1 |
6927125 | Jones et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6933551 | Stribley et al. | Aug 2005 | B1 |
6933869 | Starr et al. | Aug 2005 | B1 |
6949781 | Chang et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6963122 | Soenen et al. | Nov 2005 | B1 |
6972463 | Cheng | Dec 2005 | B2 |
6974744 | Aram et al. | Dec 2005 | B1 |
7009832 | Chen et al. | Mar 2006 | B1 |
7013436 | Morton et al. | Mar 2006 | B1 |
7027287 | Georgakos | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7038296 | Laws | May 2006 | B2 |
7050290 | Tang et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7116544 | Sutardja | Oct 2006 | B1 |
7154734 | Schultz et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7161228 | Pettit | Jan 2007 | B1 |
7170178 | Bely et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7193263 | Barth | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7195971 | Bernstein et al. | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7202548 | Lee | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7205854 | Liu | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7259945 | Cleveland | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7259956 | Fong et al. | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7271465 | Jessie et al. | Sep 2007 | B2 |
7274085 | Hsu et al. | Sep 2007 | B1 |
7298001 | Liu | Nov 2007 | B1 |
7348624 | Sakaguchi et al. | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7394274 | Muniandy et al. | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7485914 | Huang et al. | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7564264 | Morrison et al. | Jul 2009 | B1 |
7663233 | Lim | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7768054 | Benetik | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7944732 | de Jong et al. | May 2011 | B2 |
7956438 | Quinn | Jun 2011 | B2 |
7994609 | Quinn | Aug 2011 | B2 |
7994610 | Quinn | Aug 2011 | B1 |
8207592 | Quinn | Jun 2012 | B2 |
8362589 | Quinn | Jan 2013 | B2 |
20030132475 | Kanamori | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030183884 | Miyazawa | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20050077581 | Chang et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050135042 | Chiu-Kit Fong et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050161725 | Da Dalt | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20060203424 | Chen et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20070096720 | Clements et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070181973 | Hung et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070190760 | Coolbaugh et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070278551 | Anthony | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20070296013 | Chang et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080239619 | Okamoto et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20090057826 | Kim et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20100125989 | Huang et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100127348 | Quinn | May 2010 | A1 |
20100127349 | Quinn | May 2010 | A1 |
20120229203 | Sadoughi et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
25 48 563 | May 1977 | DE |
100 46 910 | Oct 2001 | DE |
10145 462 | Apr 2003 | DE |
1 149 569 | Apr 1969 | GB |
1 469 944 | Apr 1977 | GB |
57-106804 | Jul 1982 | JP |
58-051552 | Mar 1983 | JP |
59-91718 | Jun 1984 | JP |
61-259560 | Nov 1986 | JP |
61-263251 | Nov 1986 | JP |
63-070550 | Mar 1988 | JP |
01084616 | Mar 1989 | JP |
01096943 | Apr 1989 | JP |
01-313917 | Dec 1989 | JP |
01298322 | Dec 1989 | JP |
02231755 | Sep 1990 | JP |
02-268439 | Nov 1990 | JP |
02-307275 | Dec 1990 | JP |
03-008360 | Jan 1991 | JP |
03-071612 | Mar 1991 | JP |
04-268756 | Sep 1992 | JP |
07-283076 | Oct 1995 | JP |
09199973 | Jul 1997 | JP |
11274887 | Oct 1999 | JP |
2001267503 | Sep 2001 | JP |
WO 03090280 | Oct 2003 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Aparicio, R., et al., Capacity Limits and Matching Properties of Integrated Capacitors, IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits, vol. 37, No. 3, Mar. 2002, pp. 384-393. |
Amintoosi et al., “Using pattern matching for tiling and packing problems” European Journal of Operational Research, Amsterdam, NL, vol. 83, No. 3, Jul. 10, 2007, pp. 950-960. |
Aparicio and Hajimiri, “Capacity Limits and Matching Properties of Integrated Capacitors”, IEEE J. Solid-State circuits, vol. 37, No. 3, pp. 384-93, Mar. 2002. |
Chan et al., “Analysis of MMIC Structures Using an Efficient Iterative Approach”, IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques, vol. 36, No. 1, Jan. 1988, pp. 96-105. |
Fukuda, H. et al., “Enumeration of Polyominoes, Polyiamonds and Polyhexes for Isohedral Tilings with Rotational Symmetry”, Jun. 11, 2007, Computational Geometry and Graph Theory, Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin Heidelberg, pp. 68-78. |
Imamura et al., “Bending-Comb capacitor with a Small Parasitic Inductance”, 2002 Symposium on VLSI Circuits Digest of Technical Papers, IEEE 2002, Jun. 13-15, 2002, pp. 22-25. |
Jacobsen, Jesper, Lykke “Tetromino tilings and the Tutte polynomial”, Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical, vol. 40, No. 7, Feb. 16, 2007. pp. 1439-1446. |
Rajagopalan et al., “Optimization of Metal-Metal Comb-Capacitors for RF Applications”, Wireless Design & Development, Mar. 4, 2001, pp. 1-4. |
Rhoads et al., “Planar tilings by polyominoes, polyhexes and polyiamonds”, Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics, Amsterdam, NL, vol. 174, No. 2, Feb. 15, 2005, pp. 329-353. |
Samavati, H. et al., “Fractal Capacitor”, IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuit, vol. 33, No. 12 pp., 2035-2041, Dec. 1998. |
Sowlati et al., “High Density Capacitance Structures in Submicron CMOS for Low Power RF Applications”, International Symposium on Low Power Electronics and Design, 2001, Aug. 6-7, 2001, pp. 243-246. |
Wakayama et al., “A 30-MHz Low-Jitter High-Linearity CMOS Voltage-Controlled Oscillator”, IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits, vol. sc-22, No. 6, Dec. 1987, pp. 1074-1081. |
Bersuker, G. et al., Mechanism of Electron Trapping and Characteristics of Traps in HfO2 Gate Stacks, IEEE Transactions on Device and Materials Reliability, vol. 7, No. 1, Mar. 2007, pp. 138-145. |
Keane, J. et al., “An On-Chip NBTI Sensor for Measuring pMOS Threshold Voltage Degradation”, IEEE Transactions on Very Large Scale Integration (VLSI) Systems, 1-10. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20130063861 A1 | Mar 2013 | US |