This disclosure relates to batteries, more particularly to batteries formed by deposition of materials of interdigitated stripes.
Numerous devices such as batteries, fuel cells, electrical interconnects and others can benefit from tightly spaced interdigitated stripes of dissimilar materials. The term ‘stripe’ as used here means a line or other shape of material that contains only that material. It does not mix with adjacent stripes of other materials.
Issues arise when trying to produce tightly spaced interdigitated stripes. In one approach, flow focusing using compression produces fine features of functional material in paste form. Examples of this approach can be found in U.S. Pat. No. 7,765,949, issued Aug. 3, 2010; and U.S. Pat. No. 7,799,371, issued Sep. 21, 2010. The approach taken in these patents relates to combining materials into ‘co-laminar’ flows, where three laminar flows of two different materials are brought together to form one flow, but where the two materials do not mix together. This approach suffices in application where the features are on the order of tens of microns arrayed on a millimeter scale pitch. For example, a solar cell may have a width of 156 mm and about 80 gridlines, each about 50 microns wide separated by almost 2 mm from a neighboring gridline.
In contrast, the interdigitated structures called for in the design of electrodes for energy storage devices may require micron scale features interleaved on the micron scale. For example, a typical cathode structure may involve interleaved structures that are 5 microns wide and 100 microns tall. An electrode structure may be 300 mm wide and 60,000 interleaved fingers of dissimilar materials. To dispense these materials from separate nozzles or in from multi-material slot containers would be impractical.
A co-extrusion device includes at least one first inlet port to receive a first material, at least one second inlet port to receive a second material, a first combining channel arranged to receive the first material and the second material and combine the first and second materials into a first combined flow flowing in a first direction, a splitter channel arranged to receive the first combined flow and to split the first combined flow into at least two split flows in a second direction at least partially orthogonal to the first direction, wherein each split flow consists of the first and second materials, a second combining channel arranged to receive the split flows and combine the split flows into a second combined flow in the first direction, and at least one exit orifice arranged to allow the materials to exit the device as a single flow.
In order to attain an interdigitated structure having micron features on a micron scale, it is possible to combine and focus two or more flows, split the combined flow into separate combined flows and then recombine and further focus the flows in repeated stages. This discussion will refer to the fluidic process that produces interdigitated flows of dissimilar fluids as ‘fluid folding.’ This discussion may also refer to the fluidic structure that performs the operations of combining, focusing, splitting, and recombining, etc., as a ‘folding cascade.’
The term ‘focusing’ as used here means the combining of two or more flows of dissimilar fluids into a combined flow that has a lateral extent across the width of the combined flow at least less than the combined lateral extent of the flows prior to combination. Typically the width of the combined flow after focusing has a lateral extent that approximately equals the lateral extent across one of the flows prior to combination. For example, if a combined flow consists of one ‘stripe’ or finger each of material A and material B, the combined flow will have a lateral extent of measure X. When the flow is split and then recombined, now having two stripes each of materials A and B interleaved, the lateral extent of this flow will have the same lateral extent X of the previous flow.
At stage 20, the combined flow splits into two separate combined flows. Note that the cascade is three dimensional, so the splitting occurs in a direction orthogonal to both the flow direction and the initial combining and focusing, that is, up and down in the figure.
The two combined flows move separately from each other and are directed to be in lateral proximity at stage 22. At stage 24, the two separate combined flows are combined into a second combined flow, which is then focused at stage 26. This combined flow is then split again at stage 28 in a similar or identical fashion as at stage 20, separated at stage 30 and then recombined at stage 32. At 34, the combined flow is then focused. While this process may repeat as many times as desired, only limited by the ability of the materials to remain separated from each other with no complete mixing when combined, at some point the combined flow will exit the cascade as a single flow through an exit orifice or nozzle. An advantage of this technique lies in its ability to produce material features much smaller and more numerous than the fluidic channels that convey them.
The combined flow is then split into two separate combined flows at the junction of the combining channel 46 and the splitter channels 50 and 48. As shown in
The two separated combined flows are recombined into a second combined flow by combining channel 52, which also focuses the second combined flow. The second combined flow in this example consists of four interleaved fingers, two each of the first and second materials. A second set of splitter channels, 56 and 54 then split the second combined flow into two separate combined flows. The structure 58 includes another combining channel, forming a third combined flow of 8 interleaved fingers, 4 each of the first and second materials. Optionally the structure 58 may also include an exit orifice with chamfered walls to allow the combined flow to exit the cascade as a single flow.
In operation, looking at
One should note that the structure of
The splitting and combining processes may continue as long as desired within the constraints of the fluids, which may be pastes, to maintain their individual compositions without complete mixing. At each stage of combining and focusing, the line count doubles and the width is decreased for each line by a factor of 2. The cumulative line width reduction is 2n, which is the same for the number of lines. From a manufacturing standpoint, it is useful for the device to be assembled from layers fabricated separately and then stacked with an alignment tolerance. The layers are then clamped or bonded together.
In this embodiment, the device consists of 9 layers. In this particular example, bolts, such as that would use bolt hole 63, clamp the device together through corresponding holes on all of the layers. The two materials enter from opposite sides of the device. However, this is just an example and no limitation to any particular configuration is intended, nor should any be implied. Further, this particular example uses two materials and has 3 cascades repeated 25 times. These all consist of examples to aid in the understanding of the invention and no limitation to any particular configuration is intended nor should it be implied.
A first material enters the device through the sealing plate 63 and enters distribution manifold 61 and the second material enters through the opposite facing sealing plate 59 and enters distribution manifold 65. Each manifold produces a substantially equalized source of fluid pressure to an array of cascades that will perform the fluid folding.
Optional layers 71 and 75 contain series of ports 60 and 70, respectively. These layers provide one entry point for each of the cascades in the device, and may contribute to the equalization of the pressures of the materials entering the cascades. These layers may also be referred to as layers −2 and +2, in order to correspond to the layer reference used above.
On a first fluid folding layer 71, the array of ports 70 conveys a first fluid from its distribution manifold to an array of separation channels 62 on a second fluid folding layer 81. The first fluid is diverted laterally in a first direction on the second fluid folding layer. On a third fluid folding layer 75, an array of ports 70 conveys a second fluid from its distribution manifold to an array of separation channels 72 on a fourth fluid folding layer 85. On the fourth fluid folding layer 85, the second fluid is diverted laterally in a second direction opposite the first direction.
The directions of the separation channels may be flexible. For convenience, in this embodiment all of the separation channels on a given layer all curve in the same direction. Looking at layer 81, for example, the separation channels in arrays 62, 64 and 66 all divert the flows laterally towards the right side of the drawing. These channels could go in different directions, or could all go to the left as well. The same holds true for the separating channels on layer 85 in arrays 72, 74 and 76.
On a fifth fluid folding layer 95, flows from the second and fourth layers are combined and focused into a co-laminar flow by the combining channels in array 80. The flows then split ‘vertically’ into two flows on the second and fourth folding layers through arrays 64 and 74, respectively. A first combined flow is diverted laterally in the first direction on the second fluid folding layer using array 64. The second combined flow is diverted laterally into an array of separation channels on the fourth fluid folding layer using array 74.
The flows then return to the fifth fluid folding layer 95, where they combine and focus into a second combined, co-laminar flow using array 82. This process repeats n times, each time doubling the number of interdigitated stripes of materials. Downstream of the final stage of the splitting and separating, the flows from all of the cascades are optionally combined together to a common extrusion slot orifice. In the example provided, there are 3 repetitions of the process resulting in 8 interdigitated stripes from each cascade. There are 25 cascades, so the resulting flow will have 200 interdigitated stripes, 100 of each material.
One should note that while the device shown here has the materials arranged on opposite sides of the extruding orifice, the materials could be introduced on the same side of the orifice
This co-extrusion device of
In one embodiment, the printhead assembly is configured with components that are chamfered or cut away in such a manner, typically at 45 degrees, that the layered assembly may be held a close proximity to the substrate at a tilted angle. The tilt of the printhead assembly enables a feature that the paste exiting the fluid exit orifice forms an obtuse angle (between 90 and 180 degrees) with the deposited paste on the substrate. This reduces the bending strain on the extruded paste which can aid in the preservation of interdigitated feature fidelity, reduce mixing, and increase print speed.
A co-extrusion device such as that shown in
In one embodiment of the formation process for such a feature, the initial flows prior to folding may consist of two flows of material, one of 134 and one of 132. Alternatively, there could be three flows prior to folding, one of material 134 surrounded by flows of 132. This can be important if the two materials interact differently with the walls of the fluidic channels which otherwise could cause lack of symmetry in the combining, mixing and separation of the flows.
One should note that the deposition of the electrically conductive cathode or anode material and the second material onto the membrane result in a structure having interdigitated features of different materials in fluid form. Fluid, as that term is used here, means a gel, a paste, a slurry or a suspension. While these structures may progress through drying or firing stages, they will initially exist in a fluid form.
Further, at least one of these structures will generally have a high aspect ratio. As used here, the aspect ratio means the ratio of the maximum height to the maximum width of a structure or feature. Looking at
In an alternative embodiment, shown in
One must note that the proportions of the materials differ greatly, with the cathode or anode material 132 having a much greater width than the ionically conductive material 134. This may occur in many different ways. For example, the input channels, such as 42 and 40 from
In
These gaps could also subsequently be filled with the opposite of the cathode or anode material and a spacer material which prevents electrical contact of the anode and cathode materials but allows ionic transport between the electrodes, forming the opposing electrodes of an electrochemical cell such as a battery with alternating cathode and anode regions. Alternatively these gaps could be filled with a second electrode material and spacer material forming the opposing electrodes of an electrolytic capacitor or supercapacitor.
One alternative mentioned previously in the discussion involved flowing three materials. Referring back to
In this manner, interdigitated structures having micron features on a micron scale can be formed using a co-extrusion device. The co-extrusion device may take the form of a printhead, allowing faster formation of the structures using printing techniques.
It will be appreciated that several of the above-disclosed and other features and functions, or alternatives thereof, may be desirably combined into many other different systems or applications. Also that various presently unforeseen or unanticipated alternatives, modifications, variations, or improvements therein may be subsequently made by those skilled in the art which are also intended to be encompassed by the following claims.
This application claims priority to and is a divisional of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/972,370, filed Dec. 17, 2010, that issued on Apr. 14, 2015, as U.S. Pat. No. 9,004,001, which is incorporated herein in its entirety. This application is also related to U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/640,949, filed on Mar. 6, 2015.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3195865 | Harder | Jul 1965 | A |
3239197 | Tollar | Mar 1966 | A |
3382534 | Veazey | May 1968 | A |
3561053 | Pearson | Feb 1971 | A |
3583678 | Harder | Jun 1971 | A |
3752616 | Matsui et al. | Aug 1973 | A |
3860036 | Newman, Jr. | Jan 1975 | A |
3949970 | ter Braak | Apr 1976 | A |
3963221 | Yi | Jun 1976 | A |
4112520 | Gilmore | Sep 1978 | A |
4222671 | Gilmore | Sep 1980 | A |
4511528 | Kudert et al. | Apr 1985 | A |
5094793 | Schrenk et al. | Mar 1992 | A |
5143681 | Daubenbuchel et al. | Sep 1992 | A |
5154934 | Okamoto | Oct 1992 | A |
5269995 | Ramanathan | Dec 1993 | A |
5628950 | Schrenk et al. | May 1997 | A |
5843385 | Dugan | Dec 1998 | A |
5851562 | Haggard et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5866265 | Reilly | Feb 1999 | A |
5882694 | Guillemette | Mar 1999 | A |
6109006 | Hutchinson | Aug 2000 | A |
6190034 | Nielsen | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6676835 | O'Connor et al. | Jan 2004 | B2 |
6981552 | Reddy et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
7090479 | Kegasawa et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7690908 | Guillemette et al. | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7700019 | Lavoie et al. | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7765949 | Fork et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7780812 | Fork et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7799371 | Fork et al. | Sep 2010 | B2 |
7883670 | Tonkovich et al. | Feb 2011 | B2 |
7922471 | Fork et al. | Apr 2011 | B2 |
8206025 | Nataraian | Jun 2012 | B2 |
20010043398 | Baer | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20020074972 | Narang et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020176538 | Wimberger-Friedl et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20030111762 | Floyd et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030189758 | Baer et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20070110836 | Fork | May 2007 | A1 |
20090146339 | Malone | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20100239700 | Winroth | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20120153211 | Fork et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
0802034 | Oct 1997 | EP |
1757429 | Feb 2007 | EP |
1308573 | Nov 1962 | FR |
9183147 | Jul 1997 | JP |
2006326891 | Dec 2006 | JP |
0121688 | Mar 2001 | WO |
WO 2009095231 | Aug 2009 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20150174810 A1 | Jun 2015 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 12972370 | Dec 2010 | US |
Child | 14640925 | US |