Technical Field
The present disclosure relates to an interface for expanding the dynamic interval of an input signal, in particular of an audio signal of an acoustic transducer having two detection structures, and to the related method.
Description of the Related Art
Acoustic transducers are known, for example MEMS (MicroElectroMechanical System) microphones, comprising a micromechanical sensitive structure, configured to transduce acoustic pressure waves into an electrical quantity (for example, a capacitive variation), and a reading electronics, configured to execute appropriate processing operations (including amplification and filtering) of the electrical quantity for supplying an electrical output signal, whether analog (for example, a voltage) or digital (for example, a PDM—Pulse Density Modulation—signal).
The electrical signal, possibly processed further by an electronic interface, is then made available for an external electronic system, for example a controller of an electronic apparatus incorporating the acoustic transducer.
The micromechanical sensitive structure in general comprises a mobile electrode, implemented as a diaphragm or membrane, facing a fixed electrode to form the plates of a variable capacitance sensing capacitor. The mobile electrode is generally anchored, through a perimetral portion, to a substrate, while a central portion thereof is free to move or bend in response to the pressure exerted by incident acoustic pressure waves and thus to modify the capacitance of the sensing capacitor. This capacitance variation affects the electrical signal generated by the sensitive structure (typically the voltage across the capacitor).
In general, the electrical performance of the acoustic transducer, and in particular its sensitivity, depends upon the mechanical characteristics of the sensitive detection structure, and moreover upon the configuration of the associated, front and rear, acoustic chambers, i.e., the chambers facing a respective, front or rear, face of the diaphragm and traversed in use by the pressure waves incident on the diaphragm and departing therefrom. These different characteristics are thus exploited in order to obtain a wide dynamic interval.
In fact, in numerous applications it is important to detect acoustic pressure waves with a wide dynamic interval, i.e., signals having a low SPL (Sound Pressure Level), a high sensitivity, and a high SNR (Signal-to-Noise Ratio) and signals having a high SPL, a lower sensitivity, and a reduced SNR.
Consequently, in the detection of acoustic pressure waves, it is important to reach an optimal compromise between wide dynamic interval, high sensitivity, and high signal-to-noise ratio.
U.S. Pat. No. 6,271,780 describes a solution for increasing the dynamic interval in an acoustic system, comprising an ADC (analog-to-digital converter), configured to receive an analog sensing signal from an acoustic transducer. This solution envisages subjecting the analog input signal, in parallel, to two signal processing paths, having a first, analog, portion and a second, digital, portion, and each having a respective amplification and gain factor for adapting to signals with low and high sound pressure level, respectively. The two digital signals at the output of the two processing paths are combined for supplying a resulting output signal. Prior to combination, the two signals have be subjected to an equalization, to take into account differences of gain, offset, and phase generated by the previous operations of processing of the signal, in part of an analog type, and thus prevent any distortion of the resulting output signal.
The above solution is not free from problems, linked principally to the complexity of the processing chain, to a non-negligible sensitivity to noise and oscillations of the input signal, to a low configurability, and to a non-optimal signal-to-noise ratio.
Another solution is described in US Patent Publication Number 2014/0133677 in the name of the present applicant.
In general, the present disclosure is directed to an improvement over the known solutions in order to extend the dynamic interval in the detection of signals, such as acoustic pressure waves, at the same time reducing the onset of artefacts during switching between channels.
Embodiments of the present disclosure are directed to a device that includes an electronic interface configured to expand a signal from a first sensing and a second sensing signal to detect a physical quantity, the signal having a first and a second dynamic interval. The electronic interface includes a first input configured to receive the first sensing signal, a second input configured to receive the second sensing signal, an output configured to supply an expanded dynamic output signal, an intensity measuring element coupled to an input between the first and second inputs and configured to generate an intensity signal, and a recombining engine that includes a reconstructed signal generator configured to receive a first level adapted signal and a second level adapted signal, correlated to the first sensing signal and to the second sensing signal, respectively, and to supply a reconstructed signal selectively correlated to the first level adapted signal, the second level adapted signal, or a combined signal derived from a weighted combination of the first and second level adapted signals, the reconstructed signal generator being configured so that the reconstructed signal switches between the first level adapted signal, the second level adapted signal, and the combined signal using a plurality of thresholds variable as a function of the intensity signal.
For a better understanding of the present disclosure, preferred embodiments thereof are now described, purely by way of non-limiting example and with reference to the attached drawings, wherein:
The interface 1 may be obtained via a hardware circuit of an analog and/or digital type or be implemented by a computer programmed with software or firmware; in the example described hereinafter, it is provided by a software-programmed computer, without, however, the following description implying any loss of generality.
Consequently, even though the following description uses the term “signal”, this term also covers the digital implementation and in particular refers each time to the processed digital sample or to the sequence of processed digital samples.
The acoustic transducer 2, for example a MEMS microphone, illustrated schematically herein, comprises two distinct sensitive structures 2a and 2b. For instance, the sensitive structures 2a and 2b are micromechanical structures provided in distinct dice of semiconductor material or in distinct portions of a same die of semiconductor material, as distinct membranes or diaphragms. Alternatively, the two sensitive structures 2a and 2b may be formed by a same diaphragm having distinct areas of sensitivity, as described, for example, in WO2012093598.
The sensitive structures 2a, 2b are represented schematically in
The acoustic transducer 2 further comprises an ASIC 3, having a first processing element 3a, coupled to the first sensitive structure 2a, and supplying at a first output a first sensing signal S_in1 as a function of the electrical signals transduced by the first sensitive structure 2a; and a second processing element 3b, coupled to the second sensitive structure 2b, and supplying on a second output a second sensing signal S_in2, as a function of the electrical signals transduced by the second sensitive structure 2b. The sensing signals S_in1 and S_in2 are typically digital signals, but may also be analog signals. Thus, according to the type of sensing signal S_in1, S_in2, the processing elements 3a, 3b execute sampling, preamplification and/or filtering operations, in a per se known manner.
In particular, the first sensitive structure 2a may be more flexible and thus able to detect lower acoustic signals, having a first maximum sound pressure level, for example an AOP (Acoustic Overload Point) equal to 120 dBSPL, whereas the second sensitive structure 2b may be more rigid, and thus able to detect higher acoustic signals, having a second maximum sound pressure level, higher than the first maximum level, for example an AOP equal to 140 dBSPL.
Furthermore, the two sensitive structures 2a, 2b may have a same dynamic noise range DNR.
For a same signal (i.e., in the presence of a same SPL value) the first channel 3a thus generates an electrical signal having a higher value than the second channel 3b, as may be noted immediately in the case of a sound pressure level of 94 dBSPL (S_in1=−26 dBFs and S_in2=−46 dBFs).
Consequently, as explained hereinafter, the interface carries out a level adaptation. For instance, in the embodiment represented in
As described in detail hereinafter, the electronic interface 1 carries out a combination of the first and second sensing signals S_in1, S_in2, for generating a combined signal, in order to widen the dynamic interval and obtain an optimized compromise with the signal-to-noise ratio, preventing undesirable clicks, pops, and fading.
In detail, the combination here uses the value of an intensity (loudness) signal L that is correlated to a sensing signal, preferably to the first sensing signal S_in1, and is compared with a plurality of thresholds, variable as a function of the intensity signal L. In
when, starting from an intermediate value comprised between TH_1L and TH_2L, the intensity signal L increases until it exceeds the second upper threshold TH_2H, the second sensing signal S_in2 is selected (stretch A of the curve of
when, starting from an intermediate value comprised between TH_2H and TH_1H, the intensity signal L decreases until it drops below the first lower threshold TH_1L, the first sensing signal S_in1 is selected (but for an attenuation or reduction of gain, as explained in detail hereinafter), (stretch B of the curve of
In practice, the system works on the basis of a hysteresis that tends to reduce the number of switchings, maintaining the sensing signal or the combination that had been selected previously even beyond the value of the (lower or upper) threshold that determines switching in the opposite direction. In this way, but for a final level adaptation, as explained hereinafter, the interface 1 generates a reconstructed signal S_R as illustrated in
Furthermore, in the present interface, the combination of the first and second sensing signals S_in1, S_in2 is made using a non-linear factor or weight of a self-adaptive type that enables slow and smooth switching between the first and second sensing signals S_in1, S_in2 and the combined signal.
Then, in the present interface, the combined signal S_C thus obtained is amplified or attenuated using a variable gain for recovering the original amplitude of the low/high signal, thus preventing saturation. To this end, in the implementation represented in
With reference once again to
The electronic interface 1 comprises a first filtering element 5 connected to the first input 1a; a first intensity detector 6, connected to the output of the first filtering element 5; a first level adapter 7, connected to the first input 1a; a signal reconstructor 8, connected to the outputs of the first intensity detector 6 and of the first level adapter 7 and to the second input 1b of the interface; a second filtering element 10 connected to the second input 1b of the interface; a second intensity detector 11, connected to the output of the second filtering element 10; and a second level adapter 15, connected to the output of the signal reconstructor 8 and to the output of the second peak detector 11. The signal reconstructor 8 and the second level adapter 15 form together a recombining engine 16.
The first level adapter 7 has the function of reducing the level of the first sensing signal S_in1 by a reduction or attenuation value ΔS for generating a first adapted sensing signal S_in1d having, for a sound signal picked up with a sound pressure level of 94 dBSPL, an amplitude equal to that of the second sensing signal S_in2 (in the example represented in
The first filtering element 5 has the purpose of reducing the variation rate of the first sensing signal S_in1 and thus simplifying processing; it may be formed by any element suited for this purpose. For instance, in a software implementation of the electronic interface 1, the first filtering element 5 may be formed by an element computing the RMS (Root Mean Square) value. A first filtered signal S_f1 is thus present at output of the first filtering element 5 and supplied to the first intensity detector 6. The first intensity detector 6 is substantially a peak detector, which thus outputs a first peak signal P1, used by the signal reconstructor 8 as described hereinafter.
In the embodiment of
In the embodiment of
S_C=S_in1d·(1−β)+S_in2*β
The control portion 22 comprises an equalizer 25, a threshold computing unit 28 (see
In detail, the equalizer 25 is formed by a filter having the task of further reducing the variation rate of the signal to be compared with the switching thresholds (intensity signal L). In particular, the equalizer 25 reacts rapidly while the sound signal increases, but more slowly when the picked up sound signal drops, and thus introduces a delay in this phase. For instance, the equalizer 25 may execute the operations illustrated in
In detail, for calculating the lower dynamic threshold TH1 (
initially sets the lower dynamic threshold TH1 to the first upper threshold TH_1H (step 60);
if the current combination factor β is equal to 0 (output YES from verification step 61 of the value of β, which means that now the reconstructed signal S_R is in stretch B of the curve of
if the combination factor β is other than 0 (output NO from step 61; i.e., now the reconstructed signal S_R is in stretch C of the curve of
For calculation of the upper dynamic threshold TH2 (
initially sets the upper dynamic threshold TH2 to the second upper threshold TH_2H (step 70);
if the combination factor β is equal to 1 (output YES from the verification step 71; i.e., the reconstructed signal S_R is in stretch A of the curve of
if the combination factor β is other than 1 (output NO from step 71; i.e., the reconstructed signal S_R is in stretch C of the curve of
According to an embodiment of the present device, the combination factor β generated by the weight generator 27 is not fixed, but is a variable self-adaptive value so that the combined signal S_C follows the dynamic of the input signal without discontinuity and has a value close to that of the adapted sensing signal S_in1d when the intensity signal L has exceeded the first upper threshold TH_1L and a value close to that of the second sensing signal S_in2, when the intensity signal L has dropped below the second lower threshold TH_2L.
For instance, the combination factor β is recalculated for each sample as follows (see
The comparator 26 receives the upper dynamic threshold TH2, the lower dynamic threshold TH1 and the value of the intensity signal L and generates a digital switching signal S1 supplied to a control input of the selector 21, which thus outputs the reconstructed signal S_R. The reconstructed signal S_R thus generated is supplied to the second level adapter 15, which amplifies it for recovering the original intensity, reduced on account of the first level adapter 7, but only for the portion due to the first sensing signal S_in1.
To this end, the intensity of the input signal is measured using the second sensing signal S_in2, since the latter contains the information regarding the high part of the sound signal picked up by the transducer 2, which is not to be amplified.
In detail, the second input 1b of the electronic interface 1 is connected to the second filtering element 10, which may be made substantially in the same way as the first filtering element 5 and may be formed by an RMS calculation element. The second filtering element 10 thus outputs a second filtered signal S_f2, supplied to the second intensity detector 11. The second intensity detector 11, forming substantially a peak detector, outputs a second peak signal P2, supplied to the second level adapter 15 to determine the level of gain intended for the reconstructed signal S_R.
The second level adapter 15 operates substantially as an amplifier of the reconstructed signal S_R, which has a constant gain ΔS (thus equal to the reduction of the first level adapter 7, in the example equal to 20 dB) up to a certain level of the input signal (here up to 120 dBSPL, maximum level of the first sensing signal S_in1) and then decreases.
In an embodiment of the present device, in the above second interval, the amplitude of the reconstructed signal S_R is reduced linearly down to zero at the maximum detectable level (in the example considered 140 dBSPL).
According to a different embodiment, in this second interval, a maximum gain of the reconstructed signal S_R is reduced linearly to zero at the maximum detectable level (in the example considered, 140 dBSPL). In practice, in this case, when the second sensing signal S_in2 exceeds 120 dBSPL, the second level adapter 15 calculates the maximum gain on the basis of the following law:
Gmax=min(ΔS, 140 dBSPL−P2)
Gmax represents the maximum gain that may be applied to the output signal without the latter undergoing any saturation or—in other words—without the latter being amplified beyond what is allowed by the residual dynamic of the system (headroom).
According to an embodiment of the present device, in order not to introduce sharp alterations in the dynamic of the output signal S_O, the gain G actually applied to the reconstructed signal S_R is calculated in an adaptive way that depends upon the maximum gain Gmax. In particular, the gain G follows two different dynamics according to whether it is increasing or decreasing (and thus the second sensing signal S_in2 and the reconstructed signal S_R are decreasing or increasing).
Specifically, here, the gain is increased slowly according to a preset constant, and is decreased in a faster way according to a value linked to the amount of reduction of the maximum gain, implementing a sort of exponential decay. For instance, in the second range of values, the gain G is calculated as illustrated in
In the example of
it initializes a delay counter D to zero (step 90);
it verifies whether the value of the gain G is lower than the maximum gain GMAX corresponding to the current value of the second sensing signal S_in2 (or of an average of a certain number of samples) (step 92);
if G<GMAX, it increments the delay counter D (step 94);
it verifies whether the delay counter D has already reached the intended maximum value (step 96);
if it has not, it returns to step 92;
if it has, it resets the delay counter D (step 98), and increments the gain G by a step-up value SU (step 100), and returns to step 92;
if G is at least equal to GMAX (calculated at the current value or at a value that is an average of a certain number of samples of the second sensing signal S_in2), output NO from step 92, it verifies whether G>GMAX (step 102);
if it is not (i.e., G=GMAX), it returns to step 92, without modifying the value of the gain;
if it is (i.e., the second sensing signal S_in2 is decreasing), it calculates a step-down value SD linked to the increase rate of the second sensing signal S_in2 (and thus the decrease rate of the maximum gain GMAX) according to the equation SG=K3+(G−GMAX)/K4, where K3 and K4 are constant (step 104);
it increments the gain G by the step-down value SD (step 106), and returns to step 92.
The interface described herein has numerous advantages.
The use, during reconstruction of the signal, of a number of thresholds that take into account the dynamic of the picked up sound signal, with a hysteresis behavior, reduces the number of switchings between the used signals and thus the onset of artefacts and disturbance, such as, in the acoustic field, clicks, pops, or fading.
The reduction of artefacts and disturbance, for an increase of the dynamic interval of reproduction of the picked up signal, is enhanced by the other measures implemented by the present interface. In particular, the process of repeated filtering of the low signal (first sensing signal S_in1) to obtain the intensity signal L that is used for comparison with the reconstruction thresholds of the signal is advantageous since also this solution contributes to reducing repeated switchings at a short distance, as likewise the non-linear dependence of the gain G effectively applied to the reconstructed signal S_R in the high value area.
The above improved behavior is also due to the use of self-adaptive weights in the generation of the combined signal S_C, which cause the reconstructed signal S_R to move without discontinuity and smoothly from the previous values to the subsequent ones in all operating conditions. In this way, thanks to the ensemble of solutions described above, even when the picked up signal has sudden level variations, difficult to predict, it is possible to completely eliminate the artefacts, at the same time guaranteeing a wide dynamic interval and high definition.
The final level adapter or expander 15 moreover ensures complete recovery of the amplitude of the picked up signal, at the same time preventing saturation of the output. The output signal thus obtained, where just the lower values are amplified and amplification of the higher values is gradually reduced, limits the presence of noise in the output signal in so far as this is not amplified in a troublesome way for the samples having a higher level.
Finally, it is clear that modifications and variations may be made to the interface and to the reconstruction method described and illustrated herein, without thereby departing from the scope of the present disclosure, as defined in the attached claims.
For instance, the interface may work in a dual way for alignment of the signals at the input of the signal reconstructor 8. A solution of this type is illustrated by way of example in
The measurement branch of the intensity signal L may be coupled to the second input 1b and the measurement branch of the control signal of the second adapter element 15, 15′ may be coupled to the first input 1a, even though the embodiments described above have the advantage of optimally exploiting the information associated to the first and second sensing signals S_in1, S_in2.
In the examples described above, the control portion 22 works on two dynamic thresholds, the value whereof is automatically calculated for each signal sample or every n signal samples for having in practice four thresholds. According to yet another embodiment, illustrated in
Furthermore, even though the threshold computing unit 28 and the weight generators 27 have been described as different entities, they may be implemented by a same logic unit, possibly as separate routines. Likewise, the adder 20 and the selector 21 may be implemented by a single reconstructed signal generator S_R.
The present interface may be used for processing audio signals both of a digital type and of an analog type.
Furthermore, as has been mentioned, the described solution may be usefully applied to signals detected by dual sensors, including non-acoustic ones. The method proposed for managing two signals with different sensitivity in order to create one with greater dynamic interval may in fact be used for different applications, such as for example MEMS inertial sensors, thermal sensors, or pressure sensors, environmental sensors, chemical sensors, etc. In these cases, the availability of elements with different sensitivity may exploit the advantage of the described interface and method, for supplying more precise information and over a more extensive range of values, without introducing artefacts or alterations in the treated signal.
The various embodiments described above can be combined to provide further embodiments. Aspects of the embodiments can be modified, if necessary to employ concepts of the various patents, applications and publications to provide yet further embodiments. These and other changes can be made to the embodiments in light of the above-detailed description. In general, in the following claims, the terms used should not be construed to limit the claims to the specific embodiments disclosed in the specification and the claims, but should be construed to include all possible embodiments along with the full scope of equivalents to which such claims are entitled. Accordingly, the claims are not limited by the disclosure.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
TO2013A0901 | Nov 2013 | IT | national |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
6271780 | Gong et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
8223981 | Haila | Jul 2012 | B2 |
20070160240 | Ito et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20090164212 | Chan et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20130294622 | Kasai et al. | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20140010374 | Kasai et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140133677 | Zerbini et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
20140191343 | Kasai et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2009143434 | Nov 2009 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20150124981 A1 | May 2015 | US |