Interface module with power over Ethernet function

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 7835295
  • Patent Number
    7,835,295
  • Date Filed
    Tuesday, July 19, 2005
    18 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, November 16, 2010
    13 years ago
Abstract
An interface module for use in a process monitoring and control system has an Ethernet port, a controller, and at least one segment I/O module. The Ethernet port is adapted to send and receive signals in an Ethernet protocol over a cable comprising a plurality of wires and to receive a voltage potential from at least one pair of the plurality of wires. The controller is coupled to the Ethernet port and powered from the received voltage potential. The at least one segment I/O module is coupled to the controller and is adapted to couple to an associated field device segment with at least one attached field device. The at least one segment I/O module is adapted to interact with the at least one attached field device on the associated field device segment.
Description
FIELD OF INVENTION

The present disclosure relates generally to process monitoring and/or control systems, and more particularly, to process control systems and process monitoring systems adapted for Ethernet-based power distribution.


BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

Process monitoring and control systems, such as those used in chemical processes, petroleum, or other types of industrial processes, typically include a centralized monitoring and control system communicatively coupled to a workstation of an operator or user and to one or more field devices via analog or digital communication paths. Field devices can be sensors adapted to monitor process parameters (such as temperature, pressure, flow rate, and the like) and/or transducers adapted to perform operations on the industrial process (such as opening and closing valves, and so on).


Generally, the centralized monitoring and control system receives signals indicative of process measurements made by the field devices and/or other information pertaining to the field devices via an input/output (I/O) device or module, which may be analog or digital. Monitoring systems receive signals indicative of process measurements and monitor various aspects of a process based on the received signals. Monitoring systems can be adapted to compare measured process data against pre-determined limits and to initiate an action (such as generating an alarm signal) if the limit is exceeded.


A process controller of a monitoring and control system can use the measurements and other information to monitor a process and to implement a control routine. The process controller can generate control signals, which can be sent over buses or other communication paths or channels via an analog or digital I/O device to the field devices to control the operation of a particular process.


Conventionally, various communication protocols were developed to enable controllers and field devices from different manufacturers to exchange data. One such communication protocol is a MODBUS protocol, for example. The MODBUS protocol defines a message structure that controllers can recognize and use regardless of the types of networks over which they communicate. The MODBUS protocol is well known in the art and is described in detail in numerous articles, brochures, and specifications that are readily available from various sources including manufacturers of devices that utilize the MODBUS protocol. Other communication protocols include, for example, HART®, PROFIBUS®, actuator sensor interface (“AS-Interface”), WORLDFIP®, Device-Net®, CAN, and FOUNDATIONTM FIELDBUS™ (hereinafter “fieldbus”) protocols.


Regardless of the communications protocol used, power delivery to individual field devices and to interface modules and junctions within process monitoring and control networks impose costs. In particular, cabling itself and the cost of cable installation increase the overall costs of such systems. Moreover, when adding new devices to network, stringing additional cables to deliver power and signals to the new devices adds to the costs, complexity, and installation time.


Recently, a new standard has emerged (IEEE 802.3af) relating to power delivery to distributed systems. Specifically, the standard involves delivering power over existing Ethernet cabling utilizing unused pairs (or signaling pairs) of wires within the cabling. This delivery of electrical power over Ethernet cables is referred to as “Power over Ethernet” (PoE). The IEEE standard allows for 48-volts and 350 mA to be delivered over the same Ethernet cabling (typically CAT5E cabling) as the Ethernet communications.


Therefore, there is ongoing need for industrial process devices that can take advantage of emerging power delivery techniques and existing cabling for coupling new field devices to process monitoring and control systems.


SUMMARY

An interface module for use in a process control or monitoring system has an Ethernet port, a controller, and at least one segment I/O module. The Ethernet port is adapted to send and receive signals in an Ethernet protocol over a cable comprising a plurality of wires and to receive a voltage potential from at least one pair of the plurality of wires. The controller is coupled to the Ethernet port and powered from the received voltage potential. The at least one segment I/O module is coupled to the controller and is adapted to couple to an associated field device segment with at least one attached field device. The at least one segment I/O module is adapted to interact with the at least one attached field device on the associated field device segment.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS


FIG. 1 is a simplified block diagram of a Power over Ethernet enabled interface module according to an embodiment of the present invention.



FIG. 2 is an expanded block diagram of an interface module adapted for Power over Ethernet and for communication between various network protocols according to an embodiment of the present invention.



FIG. 3 is an expanded block diagram of an industrial process control and monitoring system adapted for Power over Ethernet according to an embodiment of the present invention.



FIG. 4 is a simplified block diagram of an interface module adapted for power delivery to a HART network via Ethernet cabling according to an embodiment of the present invention.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION


FIG. 1 illustrates a simplified block diagram of a process control or monitoring system 100 having an interface module 102A adapted to couple one or more networks 104 and 106 to a plurality of field devices 108A-110N, where any number of field devices can be used.


Network 104 is comprised of a system 112 with an operator interface 114 (such as a workstation or computer), which can be coupled to the one or more interface modules 102A-102N via cabling 116. Communications between the system 112 and the interface modules 102A-102N can be in any communication protocol, including, for example, MODBUS, PROFIBUS®, AS-Interface, WORLDFIP®, Device-Net®, CAN, and FIELDBUS protocols.


Process network 106 is comprised of a control or monitoring system 118 with an operator interface 120 (such as a user workstation or computer), which can be coupled through a Power over Ethernet injector (POE injector) 122 via Ethernet cabling 124 to one or more of the interface modules 102A-102N. The POE injector 122 receives power from power supply 123 and places a voltage potential on at least one unused pair of wires within the Ethernet cabling 124. Alternatively, the POE injector 122 can place a voltage potential on the same pairs of wires that carry the Ethernet signal.


The interface modules 102A-102N can be adapted to communicate with one or more networks, such as networks 104 and 106. Additionally, each interface module 102A-102N is preferably adapted to derive operating power from the voltage potential on the Ethernet cabling 124. Power can be delivered on the same cable 124 as Ethernet communications. The Ethernet cabling 124 can be, for example, a CAT5E cable. Additionally, each interface module is preferably adapted to deliver power to one or more field device segments 126A-126D to power each of the field devices, such as field devices (FD) 108A-108N and 110A-110N.


In one embodiment, a 24-volt power supply can be used to power the interface module 102A and up to four Fieldbus segments 126A-126D, for example. The interface module 102A, in this embodiment, is adapted to communicate with control or monitoring center 118 via Ethernet cabling 124, to derive power from voltage potential on the Ethernet cabling 124, and to provide Fieldbus power conditioning to each of the Fieldbus segments 126A-126D. The interface module 102A allows for each installation and connection to field devices.


The Power over Ethernet standard (IEEE 802.3af) allows up to 48-volts and up to 350 mA to be carried by the Ethernet cabling 124. Depending on the power architecture, cable lengths, field device power requirements, intrinsic safety requirements, and the like, the POE standard makes it possible to operate the interface module 102A, a power conditioner, and some field devices or field device segments. For example, the model 848 Temperature module (848T) (produced by Rosemount Inc. of Eden Prairie, Minnesota) can be used as field devices 108A-108N on the field device segment 126A. Four 848T temperature modules require about 100 mA of current (combined), but together provide 32 temperature monitoring points. Assuming the Ethernet cabling 124 carries 48-volts and 350 mA of current, this leaves 250 mA for the interface module. With lower power field devices, the number of field devices can be increased while still leaving sufficient power for the interface module. Thus, a large number of process variables can be delivered down the same cable assembly as the power supply.


By delivering power through the Ethernet cable 124, one cable pair (e.g. power cabling) can be eliminated, and installation can be made simpler. In many installations, Ethernet ports and cabling may already be in place, allowing for easy installation. With lower powered field devices, the capabilities of the interface module are even greater, allowing for power delivery to more field devices and longer segments. Additionally, newer PoE standards, in the near future, may allow for higher voltage and/or higher current delivery, thereby allowing for power delivery to more segments or networks and more field devices.


In general, by utilizing Ethernet-type communications protocols, control and/or monitoring functions can be accessed, for example, via a hypertext markup language (web-page) interface, using a standard Internet browser. In this instance, the interface modules 102 are accessible by any addressing means, including Transmission Control Protocol/Internet Protocol (TCP/IP) addressing, Medium Access Control (MAC) addressing, Network Layer addressing, or any other electronic addressing means supported by an Internet browser, for example. The interface module 102A, for example, can be programmed with web server software, and can be provided with unique network address. Configuration of the interface module 102A can be achieved over the Ethernet cabling 124 using, for example, web browser software available in any personal computer, such as operator interface 120.


A MAC address, for example, traditionally is in the form of a 48-bit number (or 64-bit number), which is unique to each Local Area Network (LAN) Network Interface Card (NIC). The MAC address comprises two distinct identifiers (IDs). The first identifier is a unique 24-bit manufacturer ID, and the second identifier is a 24-bit (or 40-bit) extension ID (or Board ID), which is assigned by the manufacturer. The Board ID identifies the specific NIC, which is specific to the device. In a LAN packet transmitted over the network, the destination and source MAC names are contained in the header and are used by network devices to filter and forward packets.


Ethernet packets are variable length units in which information can be transmitted over an Ethernet network. Each Ethernet packet includes a synchronization preamble, a destination address (TCP/IP, MAC, Network Layer and so on), a source address, a field containing a type-code indicator, a data field that varies from 46 to 1500 bytes, and a cyclical redundancy check that provides a statistically derived value for confirming data accuracy. In one embodiment, the destination address is a device specific address corresponding to a particular interface module 102. In an alternative embodiment, the data field contains an address specific to the particular interface module 102.


Regardless of the addressing protocol used, the interface modules 102 are adapted to transmit and receive information in packets over the same Ethernet cabling 124 from which they derive power. The control signals, measurement signals, and so on, can be packetized into the data field of an Ethernet frame, for example, for transmission over the network.



FIG. 2 illustrates an expanded block diagram of an interface module within a process monitoring and control system 200 according to an embodiment of the present invention. The monitoring and control system 200 includes an interface module 202 coupled between monitoring and control networks 204 and 206 and a plurality of process monitoring and control devices coupled via networks, buses or segments, such as a FOUNDATION FieldBus segment 207A, a field device bus or network 207B, a wireless network 207C (with field devices adapted to communicate wirelessly), and a HART® device network 207D. Monitoring and control network 204 is comprised of a monitoring and control system 208 coupled to the interface module 202 via an Ethernet connection 210. The monitoring and control system 208 can be implemented as a server running data acquisition software, which can be accessed by process monitoring and control systems.


A POE injector 212 coupled to a power supply 214 is positioned between the interface module 202 and the monitoring and control system 208 to drive a voltage potential onto wires in the Ethernet cabling 210. Since the power requirements of the interface module 202 and of the downstream field devices are known, the POE injector 212 can drive an appropriate voltage potential onto the cabling 210, for example, up to the parameters defined by the IEEE 802.3af PoE standard.


Generally, the interface module 202 is adapted to provide bi-directional data transmissions between the plurality of field device buses 207A-207D and the one or more control networks 204 and 206. The interface module 202 generally includes an Ethernet Input/output (I/O) module (or Ethernet interface) 220 and optionally one or more network I/O modules (or other network interfaces) 222 adapted to communicate with the control networks 204 and 206. Controller 224 can include a processor 226, a memory 228 and one or more power regulators 230. The controller 224 is coupled to a plurality of I/O modules 232A-232D for delivering power to and communicating with a plurality of field devices. For example, I/O module 232A can be a segment I/O module adapted to communicate with a field device segments 207A. Module 232B can be a bus or network I/O module for communicating with a field device bus or network 207B. Module 232C can be a wireless transceiver adapted to communicate via a wireless network 207C with one or more field devices adapted to communicate wirelessly. Module 232D can be a 4-20 mA HART® I/O module coupled to a HART® network 207D to which field devices are coupled.


Generally, the controller 224 is adapted to perform primary functions on the industrial process through various field devices. The controller 224 via processor 226 can process stored data pertaining to one or more of the field devices (to condition the information for use by the control system 208) and/or to compare measurements against stored reference data from memory 228. The controller 224 can communicate with the control system 208 via the Ethernet cable 210 and/or with other interface modules (such as elements 102A-102N in FIG. 1) in a digital or combined digital-analog format. Additionally, each field device and/or the interface module 202 can be adapted to perform secondary functions, such as calibration, identification, diagnostics and the like.


The controller 224 is adapted to process information and control signals received from I/O modules 220 and 222, to direct a signal and conditioned power to the appropriate field device(s) via one or more of the field device segments 207A-207D through selected segment I/O module(s) 232.


The controller 224 may include one or more power regulators 230, which condition power for the field device segments 207A-207D. In one embodiment, a separate power regulator 230 is provided for each field device segment. In an alternative embodiment, a single power regulator 230 is adapted to deliver power to all of the associated field device segments 207A-207D. Each of the one or more power regulators 230 can be adapted to clamp or limit voltage and current levels to the field device segments 207A-207D to prevent sparking or capacitive-type discharge of voltage potential, particularly for intrinsic safety reasons.



FIG. 3 illustrates an alternative embodiment of a process control system 300 including an interface module 302 coupled between control networks 304 and 306 and a plurality of field device segments 308. Control network 304 includes a control system 310 with an operator interface (shown in FIG. 1 as element 120). The control system 310 includes a POE injector 312, which is integrated into the control system 310. The control system 310 is coupled to the interface module 302 through the POE injector 312 via Ethernet cabling 314. The POE injector 312 places a voltage potential on wires within the Ethernet cable 314. Control network(s) 306 can include MODBUS or any other control network. The Ethernet control network 304 is coupled to the interface module 302 via an Ethernet I/O module with POE function 316, and the other networks 306 are coupled to the interface module 302 via I/O module(s) for other network(s) 318.


The interface module 302 includes the Ethernet I/O module with POE function 316 and the I/O module(s) for other network(s) 318, which are coupled to controller 320. The controller 320 includes a processor 322, a memory 324, and power regulator(s) 326. The controller 320 is coupled to segment I/O module 328 for sending and receiving information to and from field devices on the field device segments 308.



FIG. 4 illustrates a simplified block diagram of a monitoring and control system 400 according to an embodiment of the present invention. The monitoring and control system 400 includes an HART® Interface Module (402) adapted to couple a monitoring and control network 404 to a HART® device network 406. The monitoring and control network 404 has a server 408 running data acquisition software, a process monitoring and control system 410 coupled to the server 408, and optionally a POE injector 412 with a power supply 414 for driving a voltage potential onto an Ethernet cable 416.


The HART® Interface Module 402 is coupled to the Ethernet cable 416 by an Ethernet I/O module with PoE function 418. The Ethernet I/O module with PoE function 418 is coupled to controller 420 within the HART® Interface Module 402. The controller 420 can be comprised of a processor 422 and a memory 424 within which functional instructions for the controller 420 can be stored. One or more power regulators 426 are adapted to drive an appropriate voltage through a 4-20 mA HART® Network I/O module 428 onto one or more HART® device networks 406. The 4-20 mA HART® Network I/O module 428 is adapted to transmit both power and signals to the HART® device network(s) 406 and to receive signals from HART® devices attached to the HART® device network 406. In general, the HART® Interface Module 402 is adapted to relay signals in both directions between the Ethernet monitoring and control network 404 and the Hart device network(s) 406.


The 350 mA and 48V power values of the IEEE 802.3af POE standard can readily support a HART® multiplex application (with 4-20 mA devices) with Ethernet communication output. HART® is typically present in 4-20 mA loops or multi-drop segments, allowing for the POE to power not only the loops or segments, but the Ethernet interface as well. In a HART® embodiment, 4-20 mA /HART® device networks 406 can be multi-drop HART® protocol segments, and the interface module 402 can be adapted to derive power from the Ethernet cabling 416 and to deliver power to multiple 4-20 mA HART® devices, for example. With lower power devices or higher voltage and/or current PoE capacities, the interface module 402 can provide power to more and more 4-20 mA HART® devices and/or HART® device networks.


It should be understood by workers skilled in the art that the POE function described above can be implemented without incorporating I/O modules for other types of network connections, such as where the entire process control system is implemented on an Ethernet network. Additionally, it should be understood that the field device segment can utilize any data communication format adapted for use with the industrial process. In one embodiment, the field device segment utilizes a communication protocol such as HART®, Fieldbus, and the like. In another embodiment, the field device segment utilizes an Ethernet communications protocol with specialized couplings to adapt the Ethernet cabling for harsh conditions of the industrial process environment. Such couplings and Ethernet cable shielding can also be adapted to prevent sparking for intrinsic safety reasons.


Although the present invention has been described with reference to preferred embodiments, workers skilled in the art will recognize that changes may be made in form and detail without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention.

Claims
  • 1. An interface module for use in a process monitoring or control system comprising: an Ethernet port adapted to send and receive signals in an Ethernet protocol over a cable comprising a plurality of wires, the Ethernet port adapted to receive a voltage potential from at least one pair of the plurality of wires;a controller coupled to the Ethernet port and powered from the received voltage potential; andat least one wireless segment I/O module coupled to the controller and adapted to wirelessly couple to at least one wireless field device, the at least one wireless segment I/O module being adapted to interact with the at least one wireless field device.
  • 2. The interface module of claim 1 wherein the interface module sends and receives information to and from a monitoring or control center via the Ethernet port.
  • 3. The interface module of claim 1 further comprising: one or more network I/O ports adapted to send and to receive data from one or more networks having different communications protocols.
  • 4. The interface module of claim 3 wherein the controller is adapted to send information from one or more wireless field devices to a control center over the one or more networks according to a signal protocol appropriate for each of the one or more networks.
US Referenced Citations (102)
Number Name Date Kind
4122719 Carlson et al. Oct 1978 A
4243931 dela Cruz Jan 1981 A
4399824 Davidson Aug 1983 A
4413314 Slater et al. Nov 1983 A
4571689 Hildebrand et al. Feb 1986 A
4665393 Wilder et al. May 1987 A
4678937 Price Jul 1987 A
4736367 Wroblewski et al. Apr 1988 A
4910658 Dudash et al. Mar 1990 A
4936690 Goetzinger Jun 1990 A
4939753 Olson Jul 1990 A
4988990 Warrior Jan 1991 A
5051867 Burgher et al. Sep 1991 A
5122794 Warrior Jun 1992 A
5269311 Kirchner et al. Dec 1993 A
5307346 Fieldhouse Apr 1994 A
5333114 Warrior et al. Jul 1994 A
5347843 Orr et al. Sep 1994 A
5426697 McGrane Jun 1995 A
5442639 Crowder et al. Aug 1995 A
5495769 Broden et al. Mar 1996 A
5551053 Nadolski et al. Aug 1996 A
5573032 Lenz et al. Nov 1996 A
5623605 Keshav et al. Apr 1997 A
5637802 Frick et al. Jun 1997 A
5669713 Schwartz et al. Sep 1997 A
5672975 Kielb et al. Sep 1997 A
5680109 Lowe et al. Oct 1997 A
5691896 Zou Nov 1997 A
5700090 Eryurek Dec 1997 A
5703575 Kirkpatrick Dec 1997 A
5706007 Fragnito et al. Jan 1998 A
5708585 Kushion Jan 1998 A
5710708 Wiegand Jan 1998 A
5713668 Lunghofer et al. Feb 1998 A
5719378 Jackson, Jr. et al. Feb 1998 A
5737543 Gavin et al. Apr 1998 A
5741074 Wang et al. Apr 1998 A
5742845 Wagner Apr 1998 A
5752008 Bowling May 1998 A
5761208 Maramatsu Jun 1998 A
5764891 Warrior Jun 1998 A
5801689 Huntsman Sep 1998 A
5805442 Crater et al. Sep 1998 A
5825664 Warrior et al. Oct 1998 A
5829876 Schwartz et al. Nov 1998 A
5848383 Yuuns Dec 1998 A
5876122 Eryurek Mar 1999 A
5923557 Eidson Jul 1999 A
5926778 Pöppel Jul 1999 A
5936514 Anderson Aug 1999 A
5960214 Sharpe et al. Sep 1999 A
5970430 Burns et al. Oct 1999 A
5980078 Krivoshein et al. Nov 1999 A
5994998 Fisher et al. Nov 1999 A
6014612 Larson et al. Jan 2000 A
6016523 Zimmerman et al. Jan 2000 A
6026352 Burns et al. Feb 2000 A
6035240 Moorehead et al. Mar 2000 A
6045260 Schwartz et al. Apr 2000 A
6047220 Eryurek Apr 2000 A
6047222 Burns et al. Apr 2000 A
6052655 Kobayashi et al. Apr 2000 A
6076171 Kawata Jun 2000 A
6088665 Burns et al. Jul 2000 A
6094600 Sharpe et al. Jul 2000 A
6104875 Gallagher et al. Aug 2000 A
6140911 Fisher et al. Oct 2000 A
6192281 Brown et al. Feb 2001 B1
6195591 Nixon et al. Feb 2001 B1
6233626 Swales et al. May 2001 B1
6260004 Hays et al. Jul 2001 B1
6263487 Stripf et al. Jul 2001 B1
6298377 Hartikainen et al. Oct 2001 B1
6337856 Schanhals et al. Jan 2002 B1
6360277 Ruckley et al. Mar 2002 B1
6370448 Eryurek Apr 2002 B1
6377859 Brown et al. Apr 2002 B1
6535983 McCormack et al. Mar 2003 B1
6574515 Kirkpatrick et al. Jun 2003 B1
6611775 Coursolle et al. Aug 2003 B1
6640308 Keyghobad et al. Oct 2003 B1
6711446 Kirkpatrick et al. Mar 2004 B2
6757725 Frantz et al. Jun 2004 B1
6780047 Laity et al. Aug 2004 B1
6788980 Johnson Sep 2004 B1
6813525 Reid et al. Nov 2004 B2
6859755 Eryurek et al. Feb 2005 B2
6907383 Eryurek et al. Jun 2005 B2
6961624 Kirkpatrick et al. Nov 2005 B2
6970003 Rome et al. Nov 2005 B2
7016741 Arntson Mar 2006 B2
7020532 Johnson et al. Mar 2006 B2
7046983 Elkayam et al. May 2006 B2
20020195308 Eryurek et al. Dec 2002 A1
20040158334 Kirkpatrick et al. Aug 2004 A1
20050130605 Karschnia et al. Jun 2005 A1
20050288799 Brewer et al. Dec 2005 A1
20060069455 Longsdorf et al. Mar 2006 A1
20060122739 Fandrey et al. Jun 2006 A1
20070019560 Brewer et al. Jan 2007 A1
20070057783 Reller Mar 2007 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (37)
Number Date Country
1578455 Feb 2005 CN
32 13 866 Apr 1982 DE
40 08 560 Mar 1990 DE
43 43 747 Jun 1994 DE
296 00 609 Mar 1997 DE
197 04 694 Aug 1997 DE
297 20 492 Feb 1998 DE
19930660 Jul 1999 DE
299 17 651 Dec 2000 DE
0 601 344 Jun 1994 EP
0 666 631 Jan 1995 EP
0 782 297 Feb 1997 EP
0 825 506 Jul 1997 EP
0 838 768 Sep 1997 EP
0 807 804 Nov 1997 EP
0 710 904 Oct 1998 EP
1058093 May 1999 EP
0 964 325 Dec 1999 EP
2 302 514 Sep 1976 FR
2 310 346 Aug 1997 GB
2 329 039 Mar 1999 GB
52-108194 Sep 1977 JP
3-212799 Sep 1991 JP
07162345 Jun 1995 JP
07225530 Aug 1995 JP
08247076 Sep 1996 JP
2712625 Oct 1997 JP
2712701 Oct 1997 JP
WO 9602106 Jan 1996 WO
WO 9612993 May 1996 WO
WO 9806024 Feb 1998 WO
WO 9813677 Apr 1998 WO
WO 9814848 Apr 1998 WO
WO 9814852 Apr 1998 WO
WO 9829785 Jul 1998 WO
WO 0064099 Oct 2000 WO
WO 0070531 Nov 2000 WO
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20070019560 A1 Jan 2007 US