This invention relates generally to optical gratings embedded within the core of an fiber and, more particularly, to apparatus and methods for ensure that interfering beams of light used to form the gratings are precisely aligned at the core region.
Various gratings and interferometers have been used to extract the power spectrum of light carried by an optical fiber, including gratings embedded within the core of the fiber itself. As one example, U.S. Pat. No. 5,850,302 discloses an optical waveguide communication system including an optical fiber having a refractive index grating and coupling means selected such that at least a portion of the light is transferred from a guided mode into a radiation mode and is available for utilization by utilization means (e.g., a detector) outside of the waveguide and the coupling means. The optical fiber comprises a chirped and blazed refractive index Bragg grating selected such that at least a portion of the light in the guided mode is transferred into a non-guided mode.
As fiber optic technology continues to grow, the creation of various diffraction gratings within the fibers will become increasingly common. Our co-pending U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/765,215, incorporated herein by reference, describes a two-dimensional, fiber-delay radiator (FDR). The device is made with optical-fiber taps forming Bragg gratings orientated at 45 degrees to the fiber core, permitting light to emerge directly out of the side of the fiber, linearly polarized. The optical fiber is wound on a cylindrical-like form such that a number of loops of the fiber are available for making a number of taps on each loop. Taps are preferably generated along each loop of the fiber so that a small portion of the light propagating in the fiber will exit sideways from fiber at the taps. A lens system is then used to capture the light from the taps and produce a Fourier Transform of the total distribution of light from all the taps. A video camera then captures this Fourier Transform light and the power spectrum of the light signal is displayed on a monitor.
The preferred construction of the FDR would include taps with “ideal” phase characteristics. To achieve this goal, a phase spatial light modulator may be used to correct and modify the tap phases. Another embodiment uses a coherent reference wave to generate a holographic optical element (or complex spatial light modulator) to correct the tap phases and amplitudes. According to this technique, a coherent reference source and a detector array are used to capture the radiation amplitude pattern of the FDR. Then, with digital processing of the captured pattern, the desired spectral signal properties are obtained.
While it is known to use an ultraviolet (UV) laser interferometer to burn diffraction gratings into optical fibers, it is critically important that the two UV beams of light are caused to converge at precisely the core of the fiber. Accordingly, there is an outstanding need to develop techniques to determine when the two (invisible) UV beams are precisely aligned at the core of the fiber.
Broadly, the invention uses an ultraviolet (UV) laser interferometer to burn diffraction gratings into optical fibers and more importantly, involves techniques to determine when the two (invisible) UV beams are precisely aligned at the core of the fiber. Two alternative methods are disclosed for performing this function, namely, refraction of the UV fluorescence through the fiber onto a paper or screen, and alternately interrupting the left and right UV beams, then directly observing the fluorescence pattern of the UV beam on the fiber core to determine alignment.
This invention resides in apparatus and methods to “burn” diffraction gratings into optical fibers. Although the technique is certainly applicable to the FDR system described in the co-pending application referenced above, this invention is not limited in this regard, and may be extended to any other application that would utilize or benefit from such tap formation. In addition, although methods are described for focusing UV interferometer beams, same techniques may also be used at other wavelengths, but is particularly useful for non-visible wavelengths such as UV light.
Broadly, the invention uses an ultraviolet (UV) laser interferometer to burn diffraction gratings into the optical fibers. Referring to
It was important, however, to develop techniques to determine when the two (invisible) UV beams are precisely aligned at the core of the fiber. Two alternative methods are disclosed herein for performing this function, as follows. Both techniques will then be described in detail.
This method uses refraction of the UV fluorescence through the fiber onto a screen. According to this approach, a characteristic pattern of refraction through the fiber is examined to determine when the proper alignment was achieved in all three spatial dimensions.
It was discovered that when the UV beam paths overlapped at the core, the “C” shapes on the fluorescing paper were nearly equal in shape, as shown in FIG. 3A. If there was any misalignment, the shapes became very different in appearance, and sometimes one of them would even disappear. In
Method 2
This method uses a chopper to alternately interrupt the left and right UV beams, then directly observing the fluorescence pattern of the UV beam on the fiber core to determine alignment. This method evolved from working with multiple fibers in a plane. Because the fibers were now stacked with respect to the interferometer, they blocked a user from seeing the UV patterns on the fluorescing paper. Therefore, it became necessary to develop a technique to determine the location of the invisible UV beams by directly observing them as they impinged on the fibers.
The set-up for this method is shown in
A mock sequence 1), 2), 3), 4) of what the CCD camera displays on the monitor is shown in FIG. 5. As the chopper rotates, the right beam is allowed through, then blocked, then the left beam is allowed through, then both are blocked, and so on. This causes a “blinking” of the fluorescence emanating from the core of the fiber. When the beams are blocked, the blinking pattern seems paused due to the chopper having only one open area. Thus, as the chopper rotates at a constant rate, the beams are blocked for a longer period of time than the beams are allowed through. In the sequence shown in
It was found that the appearance of a right or left “turn signal” pattern indicated that we were not in focus in the z direction. When the two “blinks” overlapped one another (i.e. no pointing direction could be determined), then the UV beams were properly focused along the Z-axis. To assist in determining when the “blinks” overlapped, an oscilloscope was used to display a Gaussian shape at the location of the left or right UV fluorescence. The peak of the Gaussian could be adjusted to line up with the oscilloscope display grid, making it easier to determine when both peaks overlapped spatially. This method allowed z-axis focusing accuracies of one micron or less.
Because the coating of the fiber as well as the core fluoresced when impinged upon by UV light, we used apparent fluorescent strength to determine proper y-axis alignment. We noticed that when the UV beam illuminated mostly the core, the apparent brightness of the “blinks” was stronger. Thus, to locate the correct y-alignment, we moved the fiber in small increments up and down using a translation stage until we located the brightest spot. Additionally, by using a lamp directed at the prism from the side, we could illuminate the fibers and could judge when the UV spots appeared to be centered on the fiber. This was not as accurate as the relative fluorescence strength because it was highly dependent on the lamp's illumination angle of a given fiber. Typical accuracies using the fluorescence strength method were within 10 microns in the y-direction, but the lamp illumination method yielded y-axis focusing errors as great as 50-75 microns.
This application is a continuation-in-part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/765,215, filed Jan. 18, 2001 now U.S. Pat. No. 6,611,645, the entire content of which is incorporated herein by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5061032 | Meltz et al. | Oct 1991 | A |
5351321 | Snitzer et al. | Sep 1994 | A |
5400422 | Askins et al. | Mar 1995 | A |
5619603 | Epworth et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5655040 | Chesnoy et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
5675691 | Edlinger et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
5694248 | Erdogan et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5830622 | Canning et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5832156 | Strasser et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5850302 | Strasser et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5912999 | Brennan, III et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5914207 | Nishiki et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5945261 | Rourke | Aug 1999 | A |
6072926 | Cole et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6084998 | Straayer | Jul 2000 | A |
6137612 | Startup | Oct 2000 | A |
6178045 | Cook et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6201911 | Jang | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6269208 | Bhatia et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6310996 | Byron | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6334018 | Fokine | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6347171 | Tatah et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6384977 | Laming et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6404956 | Brennan, III et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6414764 | Ouellette | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6434300 | Hammon et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6549705 | Laming et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6555163 | Hirayama | Apr 2003 | B2 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20040081400 A1 | Apr 2004 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 09765215 | Jan 2001 | US |
Child | 10643437 | US |