Patent Grant
9004874
This invention relates generally to composite components and more particularly to the configuration of mounting features of composite components such as turbomachinery airfoils.
It is desirable to manufacture gas turbine components such as turbomachinery blades from composite materials that provide favorable strength-to-weight ratios. Known types of composite materials include polymer matrix composites (“PMC”), typically suitable for fan blades, and ceramic matrix composites (“CMC”), typically suitable for turbine blades.
All of these composite materials are comprised of a laminate of a matrix material and reinforcing fibers and are orthotropic to at least some degree, i.e. the material's tensile strength in the direction parallel to the length of the fibers (the “fiber direction”) is stronger than the tensile strength in the perpendicular direction (the “matrix” or “interlaminar” direction). The physical properties such as modulus and Poisson's ratio also differ between the fiber and matrix. The primary fiber direction in turbomachinery blades is typically aligned with the radial or spanwise direction in order to provide the greatest strength capability to carry the centripetal load imparted by the spinning rotor. As such, the weaker matrix, secondary or tertiary (i.e. non-primary) fiber direction is then orthogonal to the radial direction.
As composites have different coefficients of thermal expansion (“CTE”) than metal alloys use for the rotor disk, all of the blade dovetails use a configuration that allows for free thermal expansion between the two parts. However, this type of dovetail configuration leads to a peak interlaminar tensile stress imparted in the shank of the composite blade, which must be carried in the weaker matrix material, just above the pressure faces of the dovetail, commonly referred to as the “minimum neck”, which can be the limiting stress location in the blade design.
The matrix, or non-primary fiber direction strength, herein referred to as interlaminar strength, is typically weaker (i.e. 1/10 or less) than the fiber direction strength of a composite material system and can be the limiting design feature on composite blades, in particular, CMC turbine blades.
Accordingly, there is a need for a blade mounting structure which reduces interlaminar stresses in the mounting attachment region for a composite blade.
This need is addressed by the present invention, which provides a turbomachinery blade structure that includes first and second minimum necks configured to produce reduced interlaminar tensile stresses during operation.
According to an aspect of the invention a turbomachinery blade includes: an airfoil; and a shank extending from a root of the airfoil, the shank being constructed from a composite material including reinforcing fibers embedded in a matrix, wherein the shank includes a pair of spaced-apart side faces. The side faces cooperatively define: a dovetail disposed at a radially inboard end of the shank, comprising spaced-apart, diverging faces; a first neck portion having a concave curvature disposed radially outboard of the dovetail, and defining a primary minimum neck at which a thickness of the shank is at a local minimum; and a second neck portion disposed radially outboard of the first minimum neck, the second neck portion having a concave curvature and defining a secondary minimum neck at which the thickness of the shank is at a local minimum.
The invention may be best understood by reference to the following description taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawing figures in which:
Referring to the drawings wherein identical reference numerals denote the same elements throughout the various views,
The turbine blade 22 is constructed from a composite material such as a CMC or PMC material, described in more detail below. The turbine blade 22 includes a dovetail 36 configured to engage a dovetail slot 38 (see
For comparison purposes,
However, as noted above, composite materials are typically orthotropic to at least some degree. For example, the yield strength or the ultimate tensile strength of a composite material could exhibit a 10:1 or 15:1 ratio between the radial (fiber) and tangential (matrix or interlaminar) directions.
Accordingly, the shank 40 of the turbine blade 22 seen in
The shank 40 includes spaced-apart left and right side faces 58 which are contoured in a specific manner, and may be described as having several distinct “portions”. At the radially inner end (or inboard end), The side faces 58 define the dovetail 36 that includes a pair of spaced-apart, divergent pressure faces 60.
Just outboard of the dovetail 36, there is a first neck portion 62. In the first neck portion 62, each side face 58 defines a concave curve. At the radially outer end of the first neck portion 62, it defines a first (or primary) minimum neck 64, where the thickness of the shank 40 in the tangential direction T is at a local minimum relative to the immediately surrounding structure. As used herein the term “minimum neck” does not necessarily imply any specific dimensions. The portions of the side faces 58 defining the first or primary minimum neck 64 have a first radius “R1”.
Just outboard (or radially outward) of the primary minimum neck 64, there is a first transition portion 66. In the first transition portion 66, each side face 58 defines a smooth convex curve. Other configurations of the side faces 58 which could produce similar results include straight lines or spline shapes.
Outboard of first transition portion 66, there is a second or secondary neck portion 68. In the secondary neck portion 68, each side face 58 defines a smooth concave curve having a second radius “R2”. The radius R2 is larger than the radius R1. The secondary neck portion 68 defines a second (or secondary) minimum neck 70, where the thickness of the shank 40 in the tangential direction T is at a local minimum relative to the immediately surrounding structure.
A second transition portion 72 is disposed outboard of the secondary neck portion 68. In the second transition portion 72, each side face 58 defines a smooth convex curve. Other configurations of the side faces 58 which could produce similar results include straight lines or spline shapes.
An outboard portion 74 is disposed outboard of the second transition portion. In the outboard portion 74, the side faces 58 are generally parallel to each other as they transition to the airfoil geometry.
The profile of the side faces 58 is shaped so as to be compatible with composite materials. The reinforcing fibers generally follow the contours of (i.e. are parallel to) the side faces 58. The side faces 58 are contoured such that the fibers will not buckle or wrinkle where outward cusps are located. While the profile of the side faces 58 has been illustrated as exemplary two-dimensional sectional views, it is noted that the actual shape may be different at each axial section. In other words, applicability to actual 3D blade shanks will follow this configuration described above, but adds another dimension to tailor the geometry.
In the illustrated example, the thickness of the shank 40 in the tangential direction “T” is significantly less (from a functional standpoint) at the location of the secondary minimum neck 70 than at the primary minimum neck 64. The exact shapes and dimensions of the side faces 58 may be altered to suit a particular application and the specific composite material used.
Generally, PMC materials are highly orthotropic. One example of a known PMC is a carbon fiber reinforced epoxy, which would typically be used in a fan blade. Other fiber materials such as boron or silicon carbide are also known. Other matrix materials such as phenolic, polyester, and polyurethane for example, are known as well.
Generally, CMC materials are less orthotropic than PMC materials, and may be have properties which are close to isotropic. Examples of known CMC materials include a ceramic type fiber for example SiC, forms of which are coated with a compliant material such as Boron Nitride (BN). The fibers are carried in a ceramic type matrix, one form of which is Silicon Carbide (SiC). CMC materials would typically be suitable for a turbine blade.
By addition of a secondary minimum neck 70 above the primary minimum neck 64 the shank interlaminar stiffness is softened to allow the resultant interlaminar stress to be distributed over a larger area, thus reducing the peak interlaminar tensile stress value. Analysis has shown that the shank configuration described above can lower the peak interlaminar tensile stress by a significant amount, for example about 20% to 30%, as compared to the prior art configuration. This configuration can be used to add design margin at the minimum neck of the blade in order to enable designs to be able carry more radial loads, via larger engine radius or higher speed applications, or to add interlaminar stress margin to existing blade designs.
This configuration also enables additional high cycle fatigue (“HCF”) capability for blades by allowing the vibratory modes of the blade which have inflection at or near the primary minimum neck per the prior art sketch (i.e. 1st flex or 1F), to then inflect about the thinner net section of the secondary minimum neck, which has a lower radial static stress due to the larger radius and associated lower stress concentration factor, to enable a larger allowance for HCF stress.
The foregoing has described an interlaminar stress reducing configuration for composite turbine components. While specific embodiments of the present invention have been described, it will be apparent to those skilled in the art that various modifications thereto can be made without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention. Accordingly, the foregoing description of the preferred embodiment of the invention and the best mode for practicing the invention are provided for the purpose of illustration only and not for the purpose of limitation.
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 5435694 | Kray et al. | Jul 1995 | A |
| 20060140771 | Carper et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
| 20120134839 | Parkin et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
| Number | Date | Country |
|---|---|---|
| 2372096 | Oct 2011 | EP |
| 2952964 | May 2011 | FR |
| Entry |
|---|
| Search Report and Written Opinion from corresponding EP Application No. 13155966, dated May 21, 2013. |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20130216389 A1 | Aug 2013 | US |
