Interlocking door seam

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 6296181
  • Patent Number
    6,296,181
  • Date Filed
    Monday, March 22, 1999
    25 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, October 2, 2001
    23 years ago
Abstract
An interlocking door seam provides a stronger seam for double doors, making them less subject to attack by prybars and the like. Particularly for central mail stations (CMS) and central box units (CBU), double doors present there are subject to attack by prybars and the like that force the locks and allow thieves to rifle the contents of the enclosed mail boxes. Attachment of interlocking door seam [of the present invention] to the first edge of the first double doors protects that first edge from prybar attacks. The adjoining edge of the second double door then releasably fits into a convex strip that protects the adjoining edge of the second double door, thereby protecting it from prybar attack. The interlocking door seam allows normal operation of the double doors while decreasing the risk to the central mail station of prybar attack at the seam between the double doors. Flanges present along the free edge of the convex strip provide easy engagement of that free edge. Gaps between such flanges accommodate shelving inside the central mail station. Construction of the interlocking door seam [of the present invention] by tempered steel or hard and durable materials provides enhanced protection from prybar attack.
Description




BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION




1. Field of the Invention




This invention relates to door protection and the like and more particularly to a pry-proof seam for interlocking mail station doors.




2. Description of the Related Art




In the past, mail boxes for the delivery and receipt of mail have been associated with individual dwellings such as single family residences. The mail person on foot could deliver mail to the mail box, or by driving a mail truck or the like, deliver the mail to mail boxes situated adjacent to the road.




Recently, tampering with mail left in such mail boxes has become a problem such that the mail must be secured under lock and key. This also provides some privacy for the recipient of the mail. Additionally, central box units or central receiving stations are often installed in new home developments. These central units contain a plurality of individual mail boxes for several of the residents in the adjacent area. The mail person then only has to stop at the central station to deliver mail to a number of people simultaneously, allowing him or her to cover a larger number of residents with mail delivery.




The central box units used in such new housing developments often have a five sided box unit with the sixth side accessible via lockable double doors. These double doors often have a central seam as they are hinged on their outward sides. By unlocking the double doors, they swing outward to open up the central postbox area for simultaneous delivery by the mail person. The side opposite of the double doors may have a number of individually locked mail boxes so that each individual with a mail box may retrieve their mail separately and securely as each key is unique to the appropriate mail box.




Postal regulations control the construction of such central box units in order to provide durable and accessible mail stations to which the mail person can deliver mail. However, such postal regulations may presume that the mail stations are subject only to environmental attack, such as by wind or rain. Unfortunately, it is not difficult to take a prybar, such as a crowbar or the like, and force it in between the seam present between the two double doors. The doors are then jimmied by popping the lock bar out from its place behind the second door. Upon so forcing the double doors open, the mail is available to any thief such as the one who originally used the prybar. Checks and other financial instruments may be stolen and fraudulently converted into cash, providing the incentive to break and enter into other central post box stations or even the same one on an intermittent or regular basis.




Consequently, there is a need in the art to provide means by which the seam between the two double doors in central post box stations may be less subject to attack by prybars and the like. The present invention provides a solution to this criminal problem while maintaining the easy and desirable access necessary for the central post box station.




SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION




The present invention provides means by which the central seam between two double doors of the central post box station may be protected from prybars and the like. This prevents thieves from jimmying the lock or otherwise forcing the doors open with prybars so that the contents of the mail station can be rifled in order to steal valuable mail contained therein.




The interlocking door seam of the present invention has a first strip generally extending straight along its length. An extending flange along this first concave strip allows it to securely attach to a first one of the double doors in the central post box station. The edge of the first double door is confined and protected by the interstitial space defined by the concave nature of the first strip. The first strip bends around the edge of the first door holding it therein even though the edge of the door may be angled at its end thus occupying slightly more space than a straight door would.




While the first concave strip is attached to the first double door, the free end of the first concave strip bends around, backing away from the concave interstitial space of the first concave strip. In the bending away from the first concave strip, a second convex strip is defined that can receive the second double door at its free end. The interstitial space defined by the second convex strip allows the release or engagement of the free end opposite the hinges of the second door. When the second double door edge fits into the second convex strip, it is protected and shielded from the active end of a prybar or the like. In an additional embodiment, flanges may be present that aid and guide the entry of the second double door edge into the convex strip. Such flanges may define gaps between them in order to accommodate shelving defining individual post boxes within the central mail station.




By providing an interlocking door seam for central post box stations, the central stations are rendered more secure from forced entry, thereby creating more privacy and less risk of holding mail in the central mail station. Additionally, the interlocking door seam of the present invention is easily accommodated by existing central post box stations, or central base units, with their post boxes in a retrofit procedure.




The interlocking door seam may be incorporated en masse into a cluster box unit (CBU) in order to provide a more secure mail delivery system. Additional security measures may also be taken beyond that of protecting the common seam between the two double doors in such a CBU. With respect to the double doors, a central sliding linkage may be used that slidably engages door pins present on the facing sides of the double doors so that they are held closed until the sliding linkage is lifted from place. Held downward by its own weight under gravity, the sliding linkage prevents the door pins from disengaging the sliding linkage. However, upon the post person opening the mail retrieval door and lifting the sliding linkage lever, the entire sliding linkage disengages the door pins so that both doors are able to swing free and expose all of the interior mail slots.




Additional security is provided by the individual mailbox slot doors. Instead of having a cam simply protrude through the mailbox slot door frame, an extending side flange to the mailbox slot door is also present and is a physical structure through which the cam passes in order to securely and fully lock the mailbox slot door. By providing the flange mailbox slot door, attack upon the lock, as by a slide hammer or the like, does not allow the thief or perpetrator to open the mailbox slot door. The cam does not disengage from the mailbox slot door as it passes through the side flange. If the side flange were absent, the slide hammer attack against the mailbox slot door would allow the cam to disengage from the door, allowing the door to swing open freely.




The CBU may be made of 18 gauge or other heavy stainless steel to provide a strong barrier against physical attack and in order to protect the mail inside.




OBJECTS OF THE INVENTION




It is an object of the present invention to provide a more secure central box unit for central mail stations.




It is another object of the present invention to provide an interlocking door seam that better secures double doors on central post box stations.




It is another object of the present invention to provide an interlocking door seam that is easily retrofittable to existing central post box stations.




It is yet another object of the present invention to provide an interlocking door seam for central post box stations that accommodates existing internal structures such as shelving and the like.




It is another object of the present invention to secure double doors from being pried apart with a prybar or the like.




It is an additional object of the present invention to pry-proof double doors by providing an interlocking door seam that protects and shields the otherwise exposed adjoining edges of the double doors.




It is an object of the present invention to provide a more secure cluster box unit (CBU) to protect mail.




These and other objects and advantages of the present invention will be apparent from a review of the following specification and accompanying drawings.











BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS





FIG. 1

is a perspective view of the interlocking door seam of the present invention with the top edge at the bottom of the figure.





FIG. 2

is a top and side perspective view of the interlocking door seam of the present invention shown in conjunction with a central post box station, the central post box station shown in phantom.





FIG. 3

is a side cross sectional view of the interlocking door seam of

FIG. 1

taken along line


3





3


.





FIG. 4

is a side cross sectional view of the interlocking door seam of

FIG. 1

taken is


5


along line


4





4


.





FIG. 5

is a rear plan view of the interlocking door seam of FIG.


1


.





FIG. 6

is a front plan view of the interlocking door seam of FIG.


1


.





FIG. 7

is a right side elevational view of the interlocking door seam of FIG.


1


.





FIG. 8

is a left side elevational view of the interlocking door seam of FIG.


1


.





FIG. 9

is a right top perspective view of the cluster box unit (CBU) of the present invention with its double doors closed.





FIG. 10

is a right front view of the CBU with the right door fully and the left door partially open. Individual mail box slot doors are also shown in an open position.





FIG. 11

is a cross-sectional view of the closed double doors taken from an area generally corresponding to Circle


11


in FIG.


9


.





FIG. 12

is a partial left side perspective view of the sliding linkage latch system as indicated by Circle


12


in FIG.


10


.





FIG. 13

is a top inside perspective view of an individual mailbox slot door with a protruding cam as indicated by Circle


13


in FIG.


10


.





FIG. 14

is a top side perspective view of a mailbox door slot frame, corresponding to a mailbox slot door in

FIG. 13

, as generally indicated by Circle


14


in FIG.


10


.











DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENT(S)




The detailed description set forth below in connection with the appended drawings is intended as a description of a presently preferred embodiment of the invention and is not intended to represent the only forms in which the present invention may be constructed and/or utilized. The description sets forth the functions and the sequence of steps for constructing and operating the invention in connection with the illustrated embodiments. However, it is to be understood that the same or equivalent functions and sequence may be accomplished by different embodiments that are also intended to be encompassed within the spirit and scope of the invention.




Beginning with

FIG. 1

, the interlocking door seam


30


of the present invention is shown with its concave


32


and convex


34


strips. The interlocking door seam


30


may be made of tempered steel or the like in order to provide strength and constructural integrity, particularly should it be subject to attack by a prybar or the like. The concave strip


32


defines the interstitial space


36


into which one of two double doors present in a central mail station (CMS) fits. The interstitial space of the concave strip


32


is sufficiently wide and deep to accommodate the edge of the first double door A including the situation where the edge of double door A is angled.




Additionally, the concave strip


32


may have an extending flange


38


into which holes or apertures


40


may be present, allowing attachment of the interlocking door seam


30


to the first double door A. The extending flange


38


provides additional protection for the edge of double door A while allowing greater securement of attachment of the interlocking door seam


30


to double door A. Whereas, screws, bolts, or the like may be used to secure the interlocking door seam


30


to the first double door A by attachment through the flange apertures.




The convex strip


34


curves away from the concave strip


32


thus giving rise to the general geometrical language used herein to describe the concave nature of concave strip


32


with respect to double door A and the convex nature of the convex strip


34


with respect to double door A. The concave strip


32


and convex strip


34


share a common edge


50


giving rise to the compact nature of the interlocking door seam


30


of the present invention.





FIG. 1

shows the interlocking door seam in a manner that might be considered upside down and backwards from the configuration shown in FIG.


2


. The lower part of the interlocking door seam


30


in

FIG. 1

corresponds to the upper part of the interlocking door seam


30


in FIG.


2


. However, due to the relative proportions enjoyed between the concave


32


and convex


34


strips, in order to better show the interlocking door seam


30


of the present invention, the arrangement shown in

FIG. 1

was achieved.




As the concave


32


and convex


34


strips share the common edge


50


, a compact and efficient interlocking door seam


30


is achieved that optimizes the material and space used to prevent prybar attack upon the double doors A, B of the central mail station (CMS). The convex strip


34


is generally aligned with the concave strip


32


in order to accommodate the alignment between the two double doors A, B. The interstitial space


52


present between the opposite sides of the convex strip


34


is sized to accommodate the free edge of double door B. Generally, such second double doors do not have angled edges such as those that might be present in double door A to which the interlocking door seam


30


may be attached. Consequently, the interstitial space


52


of the convex strip


34


may be correspondingly smaller in order to provide a closer fit and enhanced shielding.




Running along the free edge


60


of the convex strip


34


are a number of spaced flanges


62


. These flanges


62


provide means for guiding the free adjoining edge of double door B into the interstitial space


52


of the convex strip


34


. The flanges


62


are angled outwardly from the convex strip


34


in order to provide a greater area available to receive the free edge of double door B. Upon contacting the flange of


62


, the free end of double door B is guided into the interstitial space


52


present along the convex strip


34


.




The flanges


62


may be spaced apart by gaps


70


. The gaps


70


may be present in order to accommodate shelving or other internal supporting structures which would otherwise interfere with the closing of double doors A, B when the flanges


62


are pressed into the confines of the central mail station (CMS) by the closing of the double doors A, B. The shelving may fit into the gaps


70


and be accommodated thereby. Additionally, vertical retention of the interlocking door seam


30


may be achieved as the shelving may interfere with the vertical travel of the flanges


62


. Should the interlocking door seam move vertically, the flanges


62


will abut the adjacent shelves. This prevents stress upon the hinges of the double doors A, B and enhances their stability.




Once the interlocking door seam


30


, the present invention, has been attached to double door A or the like by rivets or otherwise, the interlocking door seam


30


is ready to prevent pry bars and the like from forcing open the double doors A, B.




Once the interlocking door seam


30


has been attached to double door A, the concave strip


32


protects the free edge of double door A from attack by prybars or the like. When the double doors A, B are closed, the free edge of double door B fits into the interstitial space


52


of the convex strip


34


. The free end of double door B is thereby protected from prybar attack and the like, as is the seam between double doors A, B. The exposed curve


80


present between the two opposing portions of the concave strip


32


, is generally not subject to prybar attack due to its strength, durability, and lack of an exposed edge. When a prybar is used to force its way into the interstitial space


52


of the convex strip


34


, the prybar will encounter the second double door B and find little, if any, edge upon which to exercise its leverage. The close fit between double door B and the common edge


50


serve to prevent prybar attack thereupon. It is difficult for a prybar to get a grip or edge there, as is true for the entire interlocking door seam


30


. In fact, when prybar attack is made there, the interstitial space


52


serves to force the convex strip


34


closer to the concave strip


32


thereby enhancing the security effect of the interlocking door seam


30


of the present invention.




While the interstitial space


52


of the convex strip


34


is narrow, the flanges


62


serve as means by which the free edge of double door B may be easily fitted into the convex strip


34


. Additionally, as shown in the cross section

FIGS. 3 & 4

, there is an offset


72


present between the common edge


50


(between the concave


32


and the convex


34


strips) and the flanges


62


. Thus, when the free edge of double door B is guided toward the convex strip


34


by the flanges


62


, that free edge will travel along the flanges


62


until it engages the common edge


50


where it is guided into the interstitial space


52


.




As the interlocking door seam


30


of the present invention provides greater means by which the seam present between double doors A, B may be secured, thieves will be deterred from successfully prying open the central mail station (CMS) and rifling the contents therein for personal gain. Material currently used for central mail stations (CMS) may continue to be used for such stations, however, with the fortified seam provided by the interlocking door seam


30


, such central mail stations (CMS) are less subject to successful attack.




The interlocking door seam of the present invention may also be incorporated ab initial into a cluster box unit (CBU) in order to provide a more secure mail station for the temporary holding of delivered mail until it can be received by the recipient.




As shown in

FIGS. 9-14

, the CBU


100


of present invention appears generally to be a nondescript mail station for the temporary holding of mail for its recipients. However, upon closer inspection (FIG.


10


), the CBU


100


has many security features in order to defeat the interest of an mischievous thief from interfering with the proper delivery of mail.




Referring to

FIG. 9

, the CBU


100


is generally encased in a thick shell


102


of


18


gauge or other stainless steel that circumscribes five of the six sides of the generally-rectangular prism defined by the CBU. Rivets or other reinforced attachments may sturdily connect different sections of the CBU. Furthermore, a pedestal P may provide vertical support, lifting the CBU


100


off of the ground for easier access. Furthermore, a shroud or extended flange


106


may circumscribe the double doors


108


,


110


on three sides to provide protection from the elements, such as wind and rain.




Referring now to

FIG. 9

, the double doors


108


,


110


both articulate with respect to the main portion


112


of the CBU


100


. The reinforced, protected, or otherwise secure hinges


114


provide the pivot upon which the doors


108


,


110


articulate. When closed, the doors


108


,


110


securely enclose the slotted or shelved confines of the main or chassis portion


112


of the CBU. By articulating upon hinges


114


, the double doors


108


,


110


provide open, free, and full access to the confines of the chassis


112


when the double doors


108


,


110


are open. The present invention provides several different mechanisms by which the confines of the CBU chassis


112


are securely confined so that the mail left for a particular recipient is held in safekeeping until retrieval.




As set forth above, first and foremost of the means by which such mail is secured is the use of heavy and/or reinforced materials that withstand physical attack without breaking. 18 gauge stainless steel or the like is advantageously used in the present circumstances and can form the entirety of the CBU


100


. Other similar or durable materials may also be used to good advantage.




Beyond the use of resilient strong and tamper-resident materials, the articulating elements of the CBU


100


are each individually subject to securement and/or locking in order to provide secure, but selectable, access to the confines of the CBU


100


on an individual basis or in its entirety.




As set forth above for the interlocking door seam


30


, each of the doors


108


,


110


is circumscribed by a flange


120


,


122


(respectively). The flanges


120


,


122


serve to extend the circumference of the doors


108


,


110


in order to eliminate edges against which a pry bar or the like might be applied. As is well known, pry bars, such as crowbars and the like, could be used to jimmy or force open a door, particularly one with an exposed edge that lends itself to such attack. As set forth in more detail below, the most vulnerable edges, namely those establishing the shared seam between the doors


108


,


110


, are generally secured in a redundant manner.




As shown in

FIG. 10

, and more particularly in greater detail in

FIG. 12

, the double doors


108


,


110


are held closed by a sliding linkage


130


. The sliding linkage


130


is generally positioned central to the CBU in between the two double doors


103


,


110


. Pins


132


present on the adjacent slides of the double doors


108


,


110


engage the sliding linkage


130


and hooks or recesses


134


especially designed to received such pins


132


. The sliding linkage is slidably attached to the CBU chassis


112


, but is generally held in its most downward position by gravity. By lifting upon the lever


136


of the sliding linkage


130


, the sliding linkage


130


may be lifted along bolts passing into the sliding linkage


130


through gaps or the like, in order to raise the sliding linkage


130


. As the hooks or recesses


134


need only be as long as the pins


132


are wide, the displacement of sliding linkage


130


required to release the door pins


132


can be correspondingly small and well within the easy articulation of the human hand.




The weight alone of the sliding linkage is sufficient to hold it down, locking the doors


108


,


110


in place. As the double doors


108


,


110


cannot move vertically upon their hinges, the doors


108


,


110


cannot move in a way to disengage the sliding linkage


130


once they are thereby engaged. The doors


108


,


110


only move horizontally, a direction which is against the vertically-articulating sliding linkage


130


when the doors


108


,


110


are locked by the sliding linkage


130


.




In order to provide securement for the door pins


132


, the hooks or recesses


134


should be sufficiently reinforced in order to provide a strong barrier to the travel of the door pins


132


and the attached doors


108


,


110


should the pins be brought into contact with the hooks


134


. Such a circumstance could arise from a pry bar attack on the double doors


108


,


110


. As for the entirety of the CBU


100


, 18 gauge stainless steel or other similarly durable and resilient materials may be used to construct the sliding linkage


130


. As shown in

FIG. 10

, a special post person mail slot door


138


may be used to access the lift lever


136


to is thereby provide access to the entire interior confines of the CBU


100


. The post person's mail slot box door


138


may itself have a insertion slot


140


into which letters, cards, and sufficiently small parcels may be inserted for pickup by the post person.




As is known in the art with respect to prior mailbox units, parcels may be delivered to individuals by means of the larger mailbox slots


150


,


152


. Keys fitting the doors that individually secure these parcel slots


150


,


152


may be left in the mailbox slot for the person receiving the parcel. Parcels for a single individual can be left in either or both of the parcel boxes


150


,


152


with the keys for their doors left in the person's mailbox slot by the post person. In this manner, persons may retrieve parcels from the CBU


100


without having to travel to the local post office in order to pick them up. Upon retrieving their parcels from the parcel slots


150


,


152


, the recipient may return the keys to the post person by inserting them through the insertion slot


140


. As the receipt of parcels may only be made on an intermittent basis, such keys may actually be stored in the parcel slots


150


,


152


themselves until needed.




As for the first interlocking door seam


30


, above, the opposing flanges


160


,


162


of the double doors


108


,


110


, respectively, participate in coordinated tandem in order to provide a more protected and less vulnerable shared seam which might be subject to attack by a thief. As indicated in

FIGS. 9 and 11

, the double doors


108


,


110


may be constructed so that one double door, in this case the right double door


108


, is dedicated as an interior double door that when closed is always interior to the outer double door, in this case door


110


.




As shown in

FIG. 11

, the protruding flange


160


of the inner double door


108


fits into a receiving shroud


164


that receives and protects the exposed flange


160


. The receiving shroud


164


could be added on into the interior of the outer double door


110


during construction adjacent its extending flange


162


. Alternatively, a shroud


164


may be formed integrally with the door


110


in order to provide the smallest possible gap or separation


170


between the inner double door


108


with its flange


160


and the outer double door with its flange


162


. For example, such a shroud


164


could be achieved without the use of the outer side of the shroud


174


, trapping the inner door flange


160


between the inner side


172


of the shroud


164


and the outer door flange


162


. When the receiving shroud


164


is added separately to the outer door


110


, the outermost portion adjacent flange


162


may be extended farther in order to provide a significantly smaller space, if any, that might be used to insert the leading edge of a pry bar.




As shown in

FIG. 11

, the would-be thief has to work against several individual layers of strong metal or the like, in order to defeat the securement of the flange


160


of the inner door


108


in order to obtain access to the confines of the CBU


100


.




For example, in order to defeat the receiving shroud


164


and its protection of the inner door flange


160


, the thief has to engage in several arduous tasks. First, the thief must peel back the entirety of the external extending flange


162


to completely expose the inner internal flange


160


. Initially, a thief might think by prying upon the seam


170


between the two doors, that the outer door


110


will be popped or otherwise liberated from its locking mechanism in order to allow that door to swing free. Instead, the thief must peel back the outer extending flange


162


to completely expose the inner protruding flange


160


. In so doing, the thief must work against the inner extending flange


160


which itself presses against the inner portion of


172


of the receiving shroud


164


. As the receiving shroud


164


is attached to the outer door


110


, the thief is actually working the outer door


110


against itself. In prying back the outer extending flange


162


, the thief is actually holding the outer door


110


in place via the inner edge of


172


the receiving shroud


164


.




As the receiving shroud


164


generally extends the entire length of the extending flange


162


, the thief must work all along the entire length of the outer door extending flange


162


. As the thief is Generally working against the


18


gauge stainless steel or other similar material, this takes some time. During such time, the thief subjects himself to detection and arrest for tampering with mail, a federal felony.




If the thief should persist in the peeling back of the outer door extending flange


162


, he or she will then encounter the inner door extending flange


160


which then must also be peeled back from the inner side


172


of the receiving shroud


164


. As the thief must then work in the tighter confines of the remnants of the peeled back outer door extending flange


162


, the pry bar may be limited in its working room in order to engage any gap or seam between the inner door extending flange


160


and the receiving shroud


164


.




However, should the diligent thief pursue his or her efforts, upon subjecting him or herself to the second arduous task of peeling back the inner door extending flange


160


, the thief now encounters the inner side


172


of the receiving shroud


164


. This third layer must also be peeled away in order to obtain access to the sliding linkage


130


and/or the door pins


132


which must be disengaged from one another in order to allow the doors


108


,


110


to swing upon their hinges and allow access to the confines of the CBU


100


.




As can be seen by the foregoing, thieves who are looking for quick and easy access to is the CBU


100


are generally defeated by the difficulty encountered in forcing open the double doors


108


,


110


at the common seam


170


. Other doors known in the art subject to such attack and are generally easily opened if they do not have such mechanical measures taken to prevent such unauthorized access.




If a thief should, instead of attacking the entirety of the double doors, instead attack one of the individual mailbox slot doors


180


(

FIGS. 10

,


13


and


14


), that thief will find that similar measures have been taken to ensure that such unauthorized excess is not easily achieved.




In order to provide full and complete access to the interior of the CBU


100


, each of the double doors


108


,


110


swing fully away from the central CBU chassis


112


area opening up the individual mail slots


182


for insertion of delivered mail. Each of the doors


108


,


110


provide a frame in which a number of individual mailbox slot doors


180


articulate upon reinforced or otherwise protected hinges. As shown in

FIGS. 13 and 14

, each of the individual mailbox slot doors


180


has a lock


184


which may be pivoted by insertion of the proper key


186


in order to pivot a locking cam


188


. The mailbox slot door


180


is not a flat plate, but instead is flanged on all three sides, those sides not connected to the mailbox slot door hinge. The side flange


190


has a slot or gap


192


through which the cam


188


articulates. If for some reason, the lock


184


should fail, the mailbox slot door


180


will not necessarily open as the cam


188


will not be displaced (by the lock failure) from its position (in a locked state) of travel through the side flange gap


192


.




Turning now to

FIG. 14

, the right double door


108


provides a number of mailbox slot door frames


200


over which the mailbox slot doors


180


fit. Shrouds


202


, much like the double door receiving shroud


164


, receive the leading edges of the mailbox slot door flanges, including the side flange


190


, in order to protect them from attack. Additionally, the mailbox slot door frame


200


has a cam slot


204


corresponding to the side flange slot


192


in the mailbox slot


180


. In order to close the mailbox slot door


180


, the key


186


must be turned in the lock


184


in order to pivot the cam


188


away from the side flange slot


192


. The individual mailbox slot door


180


then closes with the flanges, with the frame flange receiving shrouds


202


receiving the mailbox slot door flanges, including the side flange


190


.




When the mailbox slot door


180


is completely closed, the side flange slot


192


is directly opposite and aligned with the frame cam slot


204


. The key


186


may then be turned the opposite direction in lock


184


in order to bring the locking cam


188


to travel through both the side flange slot


192


and then frame cam slot


204


, thereby locking the mailbox slot door


180


into the double door


108


. Upon removal of the key


186


, the mailbox slot door


180


has been locked into place and cannot be opened until the key is inserted and turned in the lock


184


.




The unlocking and opening of the individual mailbox slot door


180


allows a person to pick up their own mail without providing access to the other mailbox slots. The mailbox slot door key


186


for one individual mailbox slot door does not fit any of the other mailbox slot doors.




In order to obtain unauthorized access to the mailbox slot


182


by defeating the lock mechanism


184


, as by using a pry bar, the would-be thief encounters several difficulties.




Should the thief attempt to defeat the lock mechanism


184


with a slide hammer or the like, the thief will first turn the slide hammer mechanism into the key slot (not shown) of lock


184


. Upon so engaging the lock, the thief will then engage the slide hammer by slamming the sliding weight against the far end to attempt to defeat the lock


184


. If the thief should succeed in the attempt, the thief will find that the side flange


190


with its flange slot


192


preserves the secure nature of the mailbox slot


182


. Although the lock may be defeated


184


, the lock's defeat does not remove the cam


188


from its position as inserted through both the side flange


190


through the side flange slot


192


and into the mailbox slot door frame


200


through the cam slot


204


.




Although the owner or user of the mailbox slot


182


will no longer be able to access his or her mail via the mailbox slot door


180


, the mailbox slot door


180


will not open as the side flange


190


engages the cam, preventing the mailbox slot door


180


from opening.




If the side flange


190


were not present, defeating the lock


184


would generally allow easier access to the mailbox slot


182


as the cam


188


could generally be pried away from the door frame


200


at frame cam slot


204


. Such a defeat of the cam


188


becomes a more difficult endeavor with the presence of the side flange


190


with its side flange cam slot


192


.




If, in addition to or alternatively, the thief attempts to pry the mailbox slot door


180


open, the thief encounters the same difficulties described above in conjunction with

FIGS. 9 and 11

regarding the receiving shroud


164


and its engagement of the inner door extending flange


160


.




When the thief tries to pry open the mailbox slot door


180


, the thief does so by inserting the pry bar between the mailbox slot door frame


200


and one of the extending flanges present along the mailbox slot door


180


, such as side flange


190


, (FIG.


13


). As the thief attempts to pry the door open, the flanges are secured by the receiving shrouds


202


. The receiving shrouds


202


reinforce the side flanges (referred to generally herein by reference number


210


). The reinforcement of the side flanges


210


by the receiving shrouds


202


effectively doubles, or even triples, the thickness of the side flanges


210


. Because there is some separation, difference, and distinction between the side flanges


210


and their respective receiving shrouds


202


, the strength available from the flange-shroud combination generally exceeds that of a piece of metal of the same thickness much in the same way that a cable provides greater strength than a single strand of metal of the same thickness.




A thief interested in an easy target will readily find that the CBU


100


of the present invention provides one of the least desirable targets with respect to mail theft. Consequently, it is of some advantage to provide a degree of high visibility to the CBU's of the present invention so that they may be easily recognized and easily avoided by thieves.




By providing shrouded flanges for intersecting door seams on both the double doors


108


,


110


and the individual mailbox slot doors


180


, the CBU


100


of the present invention provides enhanced barrier means preventing forced entry into the CBU. Additionally, the use of the sliding linkage


130


provides a greater degree of security as the extending door pins


132


are easily disengaged from the sliding linkage


130


by a post person with authorized access yet provide a significant and very difficult barrier to a thief.




While the present invention has been described with regards to particular embodiments, it is recognized that additional variations of the present invention may be devised without departing from the inventive concept.



Claims
  • 1. A cluster box unit (CBU) for securing and protecting mail, comprising:a plurality of mailbox slots; a double door having a first outer door and a second inner door, said double door covering and protecting said plurality of mailbox slots, said first outer door overlapping said second inner door; a plurality of mailbox slot doors, each one of said mailbox slot doors corresponding to an individual one of said plurality of mailbox slots, said mailbox slot doors imbedded in and a part of said double door; extending pins, said extending pins extending from said first and second doors; a sliding linkage, said sliding linkage sliding upon the CBU and receiving said pins, said sliding linkage holding said pins in place and holding said double door closed when said sliding linkage is in a first position, said sliding linkage releasing said pins and allowing said double door to open when said sliding linkage is in a second position; and a concave shroud attached to said first outer door, said concave shroud receiving a leading edge of said second inner door; whereby a seam present between said first and second doors better defends against being pried open as said second inner door is protected by said concave shroud to better secure and protect mail held in the CBU.
  • 2. A cluster box unit (CBU) for securing and protecting mail, comprising:a plurality of mailbox slots; a double door having a first outer door and a second inner door, said double door covering and protecting said plurality of mailbox slots, said first outer door overlapping said second inner door; a plurality of mailbox slot doors, each one of said mailbox slot doors corresponding to an individual one of said plurality of mailbox slots, said mailbox slot doors imbedded in and a part of said double door; said double door including a plurality of mailbox slot door frames, said plurality of mailbox slot door frames corresponding to said plurality of mailbox slots and said plurality of mailbox slot doors, each of said plurality of mailbox slot door frames defining a locking frame slot; a concave shroud attached to said first outer door, said concave shroud receiving a leading edge of said second inner door; a mailbox slot door of said plurality of mailbox slot doors includes a front plate; top, side and bottom flanges attached to said front plate, said side flange connected to said top and bottom flanges, said side flange defining a locking door slot, said locking door slot aligning with said locking frame slot when said mailbox slot door is closed; a lock, said lock imbedded in said front plate; and a cam, said cam connected to said lock behind said front plate, said cam passing though said locking door slot and said locking frame slot when said mailbox slot door is closed and locked; whereby a seam present between said first and second doors better defends against being pried open as said second inner door is protected by said concave shroud to better secure and protect mail held in the CBU and said mailbox slot door remains locked and does not open as said cam passes through said side flange and said mailbox slot door frame despite the breaking of said lock.
  • 3. The CBU of claim 2, wherein each of said mailbox slot door frames further comprises:a top concave shroud, said top concave shroud receiving said top flange of a corresponding mailbox slot door; a side concave shroud, said side concave shroud receiving said side flange of a corresponding mailbox slot door; and a bottom concave shroud, said bottom concave shroud receiving said bottom flange of a corresponding mailbox slot door; whereby top, side, and bottom seams present between said mailbox slot door frame and said mailbox slot door is protected by attack from prying by shrouding said top, side, and bottom flanges.
  • 4. The CBU of claim 3, further comprising:each of said mailbox slot doors of said plurality of mailbox slot doors have top, side, and bottom flanges are respectively shrouded by said top, side and bottom concave shrouds of corresponding mailbox slot door frames.
  • 5. A cluster box unit (CBU) for securing and protecting mail, comprising:a plurality of mailbox slots; a double door having a first outer door and a second inner door, said double door covering and protecting said plurality of mailbox slots, said first outer door overlapping said second inner door, said first door having extending pins, said second door also having extending pins, said extending pins of said first door generally opposite said extending pins of said second door when said first and second doors are closed; a plurality of mailbox slot door frames embedded in said double door, said plurality of mailbox slot door frames corresponding to said plurality of mailbox slots, each of said plurality of mailbox slot door frames defining a locking frame slot, each of said plurality of mailbox slot door frames having a top concave shroud, a side concave shroud, and a bottom concave shroud, each of said shrouds for closely receiving a mailbox slot door flange; a plurality of mailbox slot doors, each one of said mailbox slot doors corresponding to an individual one of said plurality of mailbox slots, said mailbox slot doors imbedded in and a part of said double door in corresponding ones of said plurality of mailbox slot door frames, each of said mailbox slot doors having a front plate, top, side and bottom flanges attached to said front plate, said side flange connected to said top and bottom flanges, said top flange fitting into a top concave shroud of said corresponding mailbox slot door frame, said side flange fitting into a side concave shroud of said corresponding mailbox slot door frame, and said bottom flange fitting into a bottom concave shroud of said corresponding mailbox slot door frame, said side flange defining a locking, door slot, said locking, door slot aligning with said locking frame slot when said mailbox slot door is closed, a lock, said lock imbedded in said front plate, and a cam, said cam connected to said lock behind said front plate, said cam passing though said locking door slot and said locking frame slot when said mailbox slot door is closed and locked so that said mailbox slot door remains locked and does not open as said cam passes through said side flange and said mailbox slot door frame despite the breaking of said lock by a slide hammer or the like; a concave shroud attached to said first outer door, said concave shroud receiving a leading edge of said second inner door in a close manner; a sliding linkage, said sliding linkage sliding upon the CBU and receiving said extending pins of both said first and second doors, said sliding linkage holding said extending pins in place and holding said double door closed when said sliding linkage is in a first position, said sliding linkage releasing said extending pins and allowing said double door to open when said sliding linkage is in a second position; whereby a seam present between said first and second doors better defends against being pried open as said second inner door is protected by said concave shroud to better secure and protect mail held in the CBU and top, side, and bottom seams present between each of said mailbox slot doors and each of said corresponding mailbox slot door frames is protected by attack from being pried open by said top, side and bottom shrouding extending flanges present on each of said mailbox slot doors.
US Referenced Citations (38)
Number Name Date Kind
693770 Wright et al. Feb 1902
1365960 Abbett Jan 1921
1459031 Murphy Jun 1923
1642533 Beer Sep 1927
1817191 Harmony Aug 1931
2049796 Barry Aug 1936
2470799 Ames May 1949
2495537 Mousel Jan 1950
2529994 Brezek Nov 1950
2556464 Brezek Jun 1951
2557908 Cross Jun 1951
2576503 Dean Nov 1951
2731098 Saives Jan 1956
2779164 Doane Jan 1957
2787206 Dustman Apr 1957
2803512 Band Aug 1957
2918319 Richardson Dec 1959
3405962 Sushan Oct 1968
3592498 Raccuglia, Sr. Jul 1971
3969845 Yulkowski Jul 1976
4072487 Irwin Feb 1978
4257633 Rosenberg Mar 1981
4345787 Dabrowski Aug 1982
4350084 Azzola Sep 1982
4725084 Catricola Feb 1988
4751834 Beck Jun 1988
4861082 Priola et al. Aug 1989
5074606 Priola et al. Dec 1991
5395145 Allenbaugh Mar 1995
5406814 Zeager et al. Apr 1995
5415020 Allenbaugh May 1995
5472378 Skoff Dec 1995
5566995 Jagiela Oct 1996
5771720 Levenson Jun 1998
5794844 Jenkins Aug 1998
5820018 Stacy Oct 1998
5820019 Spitale Oct 1998
6003761 Chapman Dec 1999