This invention relates to a riveted assembly and, more specifically, to a transfer assist blade useful in an electrophotographic marking system.
While the present invention of an interlocking rivet assembly can be effectively used in a plurality of different riveted configurations, it will be described for clarity as used in a transfer station of an electrostatic marking system such as electrophotography.
By the way of background, in marking systems such as electrophotography or other electrostatographic processes, a uniform electrostatic charge is placed upon a photoreceptor belt or drum surface. The charged surface is then exposed to a light image of an original to selectively dissipate the charge to form a latent electrostatic image of the original. The latent image is developed by depositing finely divided and charged particles of toner upon the belt or drum photoreceptor surface. The toner may be in dry powder form or suspended in a liquid carrier. The charged toner, being electrostatically attached to the latent electrostatic image areas, creates a visible replica of the original. The developed image is then usually transferred from the photoreceptor surface to a final support material such as paper and the toner image is fixed thereto to form a permanent record corresponding to the original.
In these electrostatic marking systems, a photoreceptor belt or drum surface is generally arranged to move in an endless path through the various processing stations of the Xerographic process. Sometimes, as noted, the photoreceptor or photoconductor surface is in the form of an endless belt and in other systems it is in the form of a drum. In this endless path, several Xerographic-related stations are traversed by the photoconductive belt or drum, one of said stations being the transfer station where the toned image is transferred from the photoconductive surface to a final support media such as paper. Many of these marking systems utilize a transfer assist blade assembly (TAB) within the transfer station subsystem to provide unparalleled transfer performance with a wide variety of substrates. Examples of typical TAB assemblies are disclosed in U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,947,214; 5,568,238; and 6,687,480. The disclosures of these patents are incorporated by reference into the present disclosure. The TAB typically is composed of a multitude of parts accurately nested together to form a high precision structure that is used to provide pressure to the backside of a sheet towards the photoreceptor surface. When the blade is actuated against the paper the critical parameter for proper blade force (deletion free prints) and non-toner contaminated backside sheets is blade angle. The blade angle is controlled by the upper extrusion feature and the ability of the clamp to constrain the layers against this feature to maintain a 90 degree angle. The problem is that over time and actuation life (life is approximately 1.5 million cycles) the clamp moves away from the extrusion feature and the blade angle changes (increases). In one embodiment, the clamp is held against the extrusion by eight low profile (space constraint) rivets along its length. Though the rivets are very tight initially, the plastic blade laminate, squeezed between the clamp and the extrusion, creeps/relaxes over time and use, ultimately lowering the force exerted on the clamp. Hence, with reduced force the clamp more easily slips during operation. These rivets are generally made of a relatively soft material such as aluminum, plastic or other comparably soft composition. As these rivets loosen because of extensive continuous use of the transfer blade assembly (TAB), many problems occur that could easily cause imaging and performance problems in the entire marking system. A faulty TAB could scratch or mar the photoconductive surface, tear the paper-receiving sheets and contaminate the blade and future copies with loosened toner particles. Also poor toner transfer from the photoconductive surface to the paper could occur. As noted, a main cause of a faulty TAB is the loosened rivets caused by relaxation of the plastic blade material, cyclic vibration and the counter-reactive force of the TAB against the back of the paper supported by the photoconductive surface. These problems can occur in both color and monochromatic marking systems. Movement of this clamp is the basic problem attended to by the present embodiments.
Embodiments herein provide an interlocking fastener design that prevents the lateral movement or “shear” of adjoining parts, such as the clamp relative to the extrusion. A mechanical interlocking feature, such as a projection or burr is blanked or formed on the interface surface of hole areas, in this case hole areas of the clamp. This harder projection(s), bites into the softer rivet underside and prevents eventual clamp movement. In this application, the rivet, by the nature of it expanding into the extrusion holes, in effect is made an extension of the substrate or extrusion. Adding the interlocking feature is accomplished with little to no extra cost and no additional parts or labor during assembly. The invention lends itself particularly well to riveting applications especially when space for additional parts is not available. A burr, projection or raised area is located adjacent to the entrance-hole area near the underside of the rivet cap. When the rivet is secured into the corresponding hole, the burr, projection or raised area bites into the underside of the head of the set rivet and prevents the clamp from later creeping or loosening. One or more burrs or raised projections may be used per rivet, any suitable number of burrs or raised projections may be needed to ensure non-movement of the clamp after extended usage of the TAB. Not all of the rivets in the TAB need to be secured by the burrs, only a suitable number sufficient to prevent lateral movement of the seated rivet is necessary. It is important that the length of the burr or projection be less than the thickness of the head of the rivet for reasons later addressed. It is important that the burr, projection or raised area (hereinafter “burr”) be of a material substantially harder than the rivet. This is necessary for the burr to securely bite into the rivet or rivet head when the rivet is SET. In one embodiment, the rivet is composed of aluminum and the burr is composed of stainless steel. Obviously, any suitable burr and rivet material may be used provided the rivet is of a softer material than the raised burr and the burr is enabled to become embedded in the rivet. In an embodiment, several rivets 4-10 are used to clamp components of the TAB together, any suitable number of rivets and burrs may be used within the scope of this invention. The raised burrs provide an interlocking technique that solves the serious clamp lateral movement problems, together with the eventual blade failure of the prior art.
The TAB assembly is composed of a blade wear layer adhered to a Mylar® substrate and two Mylar® substrates adhered to a specifically engineered, low conductivity substrate. These essential components are preformed (bent to ˜90 degrees) and accurately affixed to the machined substrate or extrusion via the use of a clamp and, in one embodiment, the clamp having eight interlocking burr features along its length to prevent relative movement between the clamp and the rivets. The major critical parameter as to the performance of this assembly is maintaining constant/stable force on the back side of paper during activation. The assembly when used in an electrostatic marking system activates (provides pressure) at the lead edge of the copy media or sheet and deactivates at the trail edge of the sheet in timing increments of a millisecond. In between sheets are process control patches comprised of toner for which the blade should never touch. Process control patches are used to provide a closed loop feedback to the print engine to enable consistent color rendition. If the clamp slips and the blade angles upward, the process control patch toner is smeared to the backside of the next sheet. Even though the assembly is clamped together in one embodiment in eight locations using the rivet manufacturer's most robust recommendations, the clamp in extended use would move “in shear” relative to the substrate or extrusion and subsequently angle the blade upward. Short of pinning or adhering the clamp in place, at a significant cost increase, another more suitable solution was necessary. This invention has provided this solution, i.e., an interlocking feature or burrs located on the clamp that when the rivet is seated, intentionally “bites” into the relatively soft aluminum rivet. Testing was performed comparing this approach against the nominal aluminum rivet and the vendor recommended steel rivet as to determine the permanent displacement of the clamp versus applied load. Both the aluminum and steel “rivet only” technique allows the clamp to move especially when the part is older, allowing time for the Mylar® laminates to creep/relax. However, the present invention with the interlocking burrs show in our testing no clamp movement. Life testing was conducted (about 2,000,000 print equivalent cycles) and no rivet creeping or movement is seen when comparing the time=0 feature measurements. In addition, engineering change try-out testing, performed on the system integration fleet of machines exhibited no TAB-related defects when having implemented this invention. Generally speaking in common usage, rivets are intended to hold objects together, not necessarily to prevent part-to-part “shear” movement. The novel approach given here is to intentionally create a directionally intent raised burr feature on the part adjacent the hole area to not allow lateral movement when gripped by a rivet and/or other fastener. Furthermore, for this particular application in electrostatic marking, any sharp features caused by exposure of the burrs need to be hidden (and low profile) to prevent electrical arcing from the adjacent high voltage (4 KV) corotron, otherwise print engine shutdown results.
Thus, the present embodiments provide a design to prevent clamp movement within the transfer assist blade (TAB) assembly. In one embodiment, the TAB consists of about 1-4 formed Mylar® strips clamped to a machined extrusion. There is a clamp that has in one embodiment about at least 1-8 rivets along its length. With an operational lifetime of approximately 1.5M cycles, this TAB assembly traverses against the backside of a sheet of paper beginning at the lead edge and continues until the trail edge to improve transfer. Over time, the clamp slips away from the upper extrusion feature, thereby no longer constraining the Mylar® strips, causing the blade to angle upwards. As earlier noted, this invention is able to eliminate this unwanted lateral movement through the use of a small raised burr stamped adjacent to or into each clamp hole area. This raised area bites into the softer rivet head and reduces the lateral motion of the clamp over the operational lifetime.
The blade in one embodiment is made from Mylar® (a trademark of DuPont Corporation) however, any suitable deformable material may be used, provided it does not damage the paper or substrate surface when in contact therewith.
In
In
In
In
In
In
Objective: Two different types of tests were performed to determine the effectivity of the present invention.
One test was a simple life test, where the assembly 1 is cycled in a manner to emulate actual operating conditions. At periodic cyclic intervals, a dimension is measured between the extrusion 2 and the clamp 3, to indicate any permanent clamp 3 movement as a result of cycling. The measurements were made at both the inboard and outboard positions of the assembly 1.
The other test involved applying a pull force to the clamp 3, in the direction of operational failure, while the extrusion 2 was held in place. The pull force was incrementally increased in 0.5 lb intervals up to 10.0 lbs. After each pull the permanent movement of the clamp 3 was measured. The measurements were made at both the inboard and outboard positions.
Test Results: When performing the life tests on prior art nominal configuration, the clamp slipped significantly between T=0 cycles and the first test interval, T=200,000 cycles. For the interlocking design prototypes of this invention using burrs 6, of which about seven have been tested, no slippage was measured out to life (1.7 million cycles).
For the pull test, our prior art configuration slipped at each test point, increasing in degree exponentially with increasing load. For the interlocking design prototypes (of this invention using burrs 6 to lock rivets in place), of which about thirteen have been tested, no slippage at all was measured up to the maximum 10.0 lb. load.
It will be appreciated that various of the above-disclosed and other features and functions, or alternatives thereof, may be desirably combined into many other different systems or applications. Also that various presently unforeseen or unanticipated alternatives, modifications, variations or improvements therein may be subsequently made by those skilled in the art which are also intended to be encompassed by the following claims.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4779326 | Ichikawa | Oct 1988 | A |
20060137166 | Babej et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20090294410 | Iwase et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20090080951 A1 | Mar 2009 | US |