This application is not a result of federally sponsored research or development.
The present invention relates to an improved interlocking floor system designed to produce a solid floor surface from individual pieces without the need to attach the pieces to the underlying surface or structure.
Floors provide a solid surface to safely support the occupants or contents of a structure. In addition to that utilitarian value, they also contribute to the aesthetics of the home and are offered in a variety of decorative designs and materials. Wood in particular has been used as a flooring surface for hundreds of years and has typically been constructed from multiple strips of machined lumber that are attached to the upper face of the structural subfloor.
Prior art such as Moratz, U.S. Pat. No. 1,764,331, Greenway, U.S. Pat. No. 2,088,238, Crooks, U.S. Pat. No. 2,227,878 and others describe floors composed of solid wood strips with custom machined edges that are designed to allow each piece to interlock with a previously secured piece and then once interlocked to be secured using nails or adhesive. The edge profiles described in each of these are designed so that they can be easily machined by feeding the wood strips through a basic moulding machine (a basic moulding machine is fitted with two horizontal shafts, top and bottom face, and two vertical shafts, left and right edge, that hold and rotate custom profiled cutters oriented perpendicular to the movement of the wood strip) which allows them to be produced very efficiently (run rates greater than 100 feet/minute). The edge profiles described are also ones that allow the strips to interlock when a new strip is presented horizontally or is presented at a slight angle above horizontal to the previously placed piece. The wood strips typically have a finish either applied to the top face by the factory or applied to the top face on site after installation. This finish provides protection to the wear surface but the edges and bottom of the strips are left unfinished so that the wood strips can gain or lose moisture. As each strip is individually secured, any change in moisture can result in shrinkage and the resulting enlargement of the gaps between the strips or swelling and the resulting cupping or buckling of the strips. Once installed, the wood strips are strongly held by nails and/or adhesive such that the task of removing the floor is arduous and will result in damage to the wood strips as they must be pried up with a crowbar or similar tool.
Prior art such as Eisermann, U.S. Pat. No. 6,804,926, Stanchfield, U.S. Pat. No. 6,823,638, Rosenthal et. al., U.S. Pat. No. 6,922,965, Moriau et. al., U.S. Pat. No. 7,707,793, Baert et. al., U.S. Pat. No. 8,631,622, and others describe floors composed of composite (typically MDF or HDF) or laminate strips with custom machined edges that are designed to allow each piece to interlock with a previously secured piece. Then once interlocked the pieces are not secured to the substrate so the finished floor floats on the underlying surface. This ability to form a floor without attachment to the substrate is a desirable feature as it allows for easy installation over the concrete slab that is often the bottom or basement floor in a typical house. The edge profiles described in each of these have a complex design so that a basic moulding machine would be incapable of producing them and instead custom machines holding cutters at multiple angles would need to be utilized. The edge profiles described are ones that require the strips to interlock only when a new strip is presented at a specific angle above horizontal. The strips typically have a finish applied to the top face by the factory, but the close fits of the machined edges are such that no finish is applied to them. As such, these edges are subject to exposure to moisture changes which can result in shrinkage or swelling that compromises the quality of the fit between the edges. Liquid spills in particular can result in localized swelling of these machined edges which damages the smooth appearance of the floor. Eisermann, Stanchfield, and Baert et. al. have recognized this deficiency and have described the use of adhesives or protective film applied to the interlocking portions so that the area is sealed to prevent moisture absorption at these unfinished edges.
Prior art such as Nelson, U.S. Pat. No. 6,324,809, Reichwein et. al., US 2007/0172688, and others describe floors with interlocking edges that are composed of water resistant composite or laminate strips. They are designed to allow each piece to interlock with a previously secured piece and then once interlocked the pieces are not secured to the substrate so the finished floor floats on the underlying surface. The edge profiles described in each of these have a complex design so that a basic moulding machine would be incapable of producing them and instead custom machines holding cutters at multiple angles would need to be utilized. These specialized machines must also cut with a high level of precision as the interlocking required very close tolerances between the two edges. The edge profiles described are ones that require the strips to interlock only when a new strip is presented at a specific angle above horizontal. The strips typically have a finish applied to the top face by the factory but the close fits of the machined edges are such that no finish is applied to them. To prevent the edges from shrinking or swelling the body of the strip is made from higher cost materials that are waterproof or have high water resistance.
Prior art such as Andersson, U.S. Pat. No. 6,029,416, Andersson et. al., U.S. Pat. No. 6,808,777, and others have described floors made of strips with interlocking edges profiles that are simple in design so that they can be easily machined by feeding the wood strips through a basic moulding machine. To facilitate the interlocking of these simple profiles, one or more strips of flocked material are applied to the faces of the edge profiles that are parallel or nearly parallel to the faces of the flooring strips. This flocked material provides the grip required to hold the two edges together, but does not prevent moisture reaching the edges of the strips and any resulting swelling or shrinkage of the strips.
In view of the foregoing disadvantages and limitations found in the prior art of producing an interlocking floor that is floating, there is need for an improved interlocking floor system.
An improvement is provided to the existing interlocking floor systems by starting with flooring strips made from pieces of solid wood. Using solid wood offers the advantage of a natural and renewable material, solid wood does not contain formaldehyde containing binders that are often used in the MDF and HDF portions of laminate flooring, and is more readily available and economical than waterproof or water resistant polymer materials.
The flooring strips are machined to have a specific tongue profile cut into one edge and a specific groove profile cut into the opposite edge. The tongue and groove profiles are designed to be produced simultaneously by a single basic high-speed moulding machine so that no specialized equipment is required and they can be produced efficiently. The tongue and groove designs are also ones that need to be machined with standard tolerances (+/−0.010″) as there is no close fit between them. The ends of the flooring strips can be square cut or machined with a basic tongue and groove profile so that the ends will also join together with a clearance fit.
After machining, the flooring strip has finish applied to all surfaces by the use of a vacuum coater or multi-head spraying system. The finish may be any one of a number of commercially available wood finishes that provide water protection and may be clear, opaque or colored to provide the desired final finish. The finish then dries and/or cures and provides not only the final appearance of the face of the floor but also seals all the surfaces of the flooring strip so it will not gain or lose moisture.
The interlocking of the machined edges of a series of flooring strips to form a floor is accomplished by use of multiple short pieces of a specially shaped locking strip. The cross section of the locking strip is designed to be inserted into and on top of the tongue profile and then interlock with the groove profile when the two are brought together horizontally. The locking strip is typically made from plastic or other flexible and resilient material that provides enough flexibility and strength to accomplish the interlock function. With modification to the design, the locking strip could be made using a spring type metal or polymer. The locking strip will typically only be 1″ to 2″ in length so that it can be made by extruding and then cutting the extrusion into pieces or injection molding it as individual pieces. Individual locking strips will be mounted along the tongue edge of each flooring strips so that they are spaced from 6 to 24 inches apart along the tongue edge. The design of the locking strip is such that it will still interlock the two edges even if there is normal variation in the film thickness of the finish that has been applied to the tongue and groove area. The plastic strips will not damage or otherwise compromise the water resistance of the coating in the areas where they are installed.
The adjacent flooring strips interlocked along their edges with a number of individual shaped locking strips create a uniform flooring surface that maintains its integrity without needing to be secured to the subsurface with adhesives, nails or other mechanical means. The initial flooring strip(s) would be laid with the grooved side flush against the wall, floor molding or other vertical surface, and after installing enough strips interlocking with the adjacent strips to nearly cover the floor area, a final strip can be ripped or split to form a partial width strip which fits flush against the vertical wall surface once it is installed to interlock with the previous strip. This provides for a flush connection with the walls on both sides of the installation rather than having a tongue side of the final strip touching the wall without providing a flush connection. This allows for the flooring surface to be installed over concrete that can't easily be nailed to or as a temporary floor to protect the surface below it without damage. It also allows for the flooring system to be taken up and taken apart at a later date with only the locking strips potentially being damaged in the process. This allows for the same flooring strips to be reinstalled in another location with only the requirement being the replacement of any damaged shaped locking strips.
As a result the known deficiencies of the current interlocking floors are addressed and overcome.
The invention will be better understood and aspects other than those set forth above will become apparent when consideration is given to the following detailed description and drawings. The same numerals are used to designate like components in these figures. Such description makes reference to the annexed drawing wherein:
In general, the following description adopts a terrestrial frame of reference, in which the bottom of a component is considered to be the side nearest the floor or earth when in normal use, and the top being the side opposite and facing upward. The term “and/or” is used in the conventional sense, in which “A and/or B” indicates that A or B, or both, may be present.
With reference to
With reference to
With reference to
With reference to
With reference to
With reference to
With reference to
In the foregoing description, certain terms have been used for brevity, clarity and understanding. All equivalent relationships to those illustrated in the drawings and described in the preferred embodiment are to be encompassed by this present invention to produce the intended results. It is also to be understood that the following claims are intended to cover all of the generic and specific features of the invention herein described, and all statements of the scope of the invention which, as a matter of language, might be said to fall therebetween.
This application claims the benefit of my provisional application DWMEV-4P, U.S. Ser. No. 62/600,013 for “IMPROVED INTERLOCKING FLOORING SYSTEM,” filed Feb. 10, 2017.
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 187740 | Waters | Feb 1877 | A |
| 1412506 | Carter | Apr 1922 | A |
| 1764331 | Moratz | Feb 1929 | A |
| 1723306 | Sipe | Aug 1929 | A |
| 1799729 | Cadwallader | Apr 1931 | A |
| 2088238 | Greenway | Jun 1935 | A |
| 2227878 | Crooks | Apr 1938 | A |
| 6029416 | Andersson | Feb 2000 | A |
| 6324809 | Nelson | Dec 2001 | B1 |
| 6763643 | Mårtensson | Jul 2004 | B1 |
| 6804926 | Eisermann | Oct 2004 | B1 |
| 6808777 | Andersson | Oct 2004 | B2 |
| 6823638 | Stanchfield | Nov 2004 | B2 |
| 6922965 | Rosenthal | Aug 2005 | B2 |
| 7707793 | Moriau | May 2010 | B2 |
| 8631622 | Baert et al. | Jan 2014 | B2 |
| 9003735 | Vermeulen | Apr 2015 | B2 |
| 9657483 | Pervan | May 2017 | B2 |
| 9803375 | Pervan | Oct 2017 | B2 |
| 9932741 | Cappelle | Apr 2018 | B2 |
| 9945130 | Nygren | Apr 2018 | B2 |
| 20040211143 | Hanning | Oct 2004 | A1 |
| 20040261348 | Vulin | Dec 2004 | A1 |
| 20050210810 | Pervan | Sep 2005 | A1 |
| 20060101769 | Pervan | May 2006 | A1 |
| 20060179754 | Yang | Aug 2006 | A1 |
| 20070006543 | Engstrom | Jan 2007 | A1 |
| 20070172688 | Reichwein et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
| 20080104921 | Pervan | May 2008 | A1 |
| 20080110125 | Pervan | May 2008 | A1 |
| 20080134613 | Pervan | Jun 2008 | A1 |
| 20080236088 | Hannig | Oct 2008 | A1 |
| 20090173032 | Prager | Jul 2009 | A1 |
| 20090308014 | Muehlebach | Dec 2009 | A1 |
| 20100319291 | Pervan | Dec 2010 | A1 |
| 20110271632 | Cappelle | Nov 2011 | A1 |
| 20120055112 | Engstrom | Mar 2012 | A1 |
| 20120192521 | Schulte | Aug 2012 | A1 |
| 20120279161 | Hakansson | Nov 2012 | A1 |
| 20130008117 | Pervan | Jan 2013 | A1 |
| 20130014463 | Pervan | Jan 2013 | A1 |
| 20130042562 | Pervan | Feb 2013 | A1 |
| 20130042565 | Pervan | Feb 2013 | A1 |
| 20130047536 | Pervan | Feb 2013 | A1 |
| 20140000197 | Pervan | Jan 2014 | A1 |
| 20140250813 | Nygren | Sep 2014 | A1 |
| 20140283466 | Boo | Sep 2014 | A1 |
| 20140290173 | Hamberger | Oct 2014 | A1 |
| 20150000221 | Boo | Jan 2015 | A1 |
| 20150233125 | Pervan | Aug 2015 | A1 |
| 20160153200 | Pervan | Jun 2016 | A1 |
| 20160333916 | Beaulieu | Nov 2016 | A1 |
| 20170097033 | Hakansson | Apr 2017 | A1 |
| 20170175400 | Josefsson | Jun 2017 | A1 |
| 20170234020 | Pervan | Aug 2017 | A1 |
| 20170254096 | Pervan | Sep 2017 | A1 |
| 20170342725 | Pervan | Nov 2017 | A1 |
| 20180030738 | Pervan | Feb 2018 | A1 |
| 20180119429 | Schulte | May 2018 | A1 |
| Number | Date | Country |
|---|---|---|
| WO-2012079210 | Jun 2012 | WO |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 62600013 | Feb 2017 | US |