1. Field of the Invention
The present invention generally relates to a highway crash barrier structure for use in a highway barrier system capable of addressing current requirements for improving the crash performance of precast concrete barriers. The barrier system in which the crash barrier structure is used comprises a plurality of rigid sections disposed end-to-end in interlocking relationship with one another. The end of each section has a cavity and is provided with embedded interlocks that join with one another to hold the sections together. Individual sections can be removed or replaced without disrupting the remainder of the barrier system while maintaining proper alignment. The crash barrier structure of the present invention is provided with bolt down pockets which are reinforced with minimal steel yet meet MASH test requirements.
2. Background Description
In recent years, for controlling the flow of traffic, various barrier systems consisting of large sections of precast concrete have been used along highways. The sections can be hoisted into place and removed with greater speed and ease than is usually required to construct more permanent structures. Systems of this type can be dislodged when sufficient external force is applied, resulting in a potential traffic hazard. In some instances, the concrete sections are bolted together to maintain their alignment and assure that they will not be either knocked over or displaced by a colliding vehicle. However, such systems have the disadvantage of being complex and expensive and require considerable time and effort to assemble as well as to remove without disassembling the entire structure when used in road repairs.
Improvements in the system of bolted connections has been the use of looped steel bars that allow for a straight steel pin connection holding the adjoining loops together. This system is expensive and relies on maintaining the pins which also requires one's hands in a dangerous position between the barrier sections during placement or replacement. Vehicle impact on these systems usually requires significant time and expense to remove the pins.
U.S. Pat. No. 5,149,224 to Smith, which is herein incorporated by reference, shows an interlocking highway structure which employs a pair of “J” shaped hooks that connect separate concrete barrier members together without requiring extra hardware. In practice, the end of one precast concrete member is simply slid downward from the top such that the two adjoining precast concrete members have interlocking J connections. The product is commercially marketed as “JJ Hooks®”. The “JJ Hooks®” product includes a short, approximately 12 inches in length, member to which rebar members are welded and extend inward into the precast concrete. While FIG. 3 of U.S. Pat. No. 5,149,224 shows the rebar extending only part way into the precast concrete, in practice the rebar can extend end-to-end with weldment of the rebar to both attachment hooks or can extend only part way into the precast concrete based on “pull out” strength/resistance.
U.S. Pat. No. 7,607,645 to Smith, which is herein incorporated by reference, addresses newer crash test criteria and to allow for greater use of the concrete barriers. These crash criteria are defined by the American Association of Highway & Traffic Officials (AASHTO's) Manual for Assessing Safety Hardware (MASH). The system disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 7,607,645 is an interlocking barrier system that includes a plurality of rigid upright sections that can be joined together end-to-end using a “J” shaped connection member. The connection member preferably is embedded in a recessed cavity in each end of each section and has an outwardly projected hook. The connection member, as well as its associated hook and an outwardly projected receptacle flange, ran linearly along a line extending from the top to the bottom of each end of each section (e.g., 18″) a distance which almost equals the height of each section. A plurality of bars (e.g., rebar) are welded or otherwise joined to the connection member and extend into the concrete section a distance that the minimum “pull out” strength resistance is met. In one embodiment, the rebar may extend end-to-end in the barrier structure. In another embodiment, the rebar do not traverse end-to-end distance of the section, and may extend two feet or more. This configuration eliminates or reduces the rotational forces imparted by a collision at one end of the section being imparted at the other end, thus making the interlocking structure more compliant with newer crash test safety requirements.
The present invention is an improvement in the “JJ Hooks®” barrier structure which provides bolt-down pockets, allowing the structure to be installed as a semi-permanent or permanent structure. The bolt-down pockets are at uniform spacing along the base of the barrier structure and located on opposite sides of the structure. A bolt-down bar may extend across and through the base at various pairs of bolt-down pockets. Additional reinforcement may be provided by rebar bent a generally “U” shape, sometimes called a “hairpin” shape. Toward each end of a bolt-down plate, the base of the “U” shaped rebar is located (and can be welded or otherwise secured if desired) near a bolt hole in the bolt-down plate with the legs of the “U” extending at an angle up into the concrete structure. Further reinforcing at the sites of the bolt-down pockets is provided by rebar, sometimes called “stirrups”, bent in a form which generally conforms to the cross-section of the precast concrete structure. The structure minimizes the amount of steel used and still meets the MASH tests. In addition, the cost of fabrication is further reduced by requiring less labor to manufacture.
The foregoing and other objects, aspects and advantages will be better understood from the following detailed description of a preferred embodiment of the invention with reference to the drawings, in which:
Referring now to the drawings, and more particularly to
With such a structure, there is concern that a crash against the structure could cause the structure to crack at the locations of the bolt-down pockets or cause a shearing force of the bolts resulting in a failure of the structure in MASH tests. The present invention avoids these failures through reinforcement of the bolt-down plates and the precast concrete structure at the locations of the bolt-down pockets. As shown in
While the invention has been described in terms of a single preferred embodiment, those skilled in the art will recognize that the invention can be practiced with modification within the spirit and scope of the appended claims.
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/US2013/057250 | 8/29/2013 | WO | 00 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2014/036237 | 3/6/2014 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4105353 | Bork | Aug 1978 | A |
4946306 | Yodock | Aug 1990 | A |
5149224 | Smith | Sep 1992 | A |
5218805 | Rex | Jun 1993 | A |
5605413 | Brown | Feb 1997 | A |
5651635 | Nagle | Jul 1997 | A |
5685665 | Lembo | Nov 1997 | A |
5882140 | Yodock, Jr. | Mar 1999 | A |
6679649 | Capolupo | Jan 2004 | B1 |
6851887 | Lembo | Feb 2005 | B2 |
7185882 | Buth | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7226236 | Mertens | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7607645 | Smith | Oct 2009 | B2 |
7618212 | Yodock, III | Nov 2009 | B2 |
20030068199 | Ulislam et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030161683 | Lembo | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20050152744 | Straub | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20100301126 | Meyer | Dec 2010 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2004111362 | Dec 2004 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20150218763 A1 | Aug 2015 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61696144 | Sep 2012 | US |