This invention relates to jewelry having interchangeable elements and especially to jewelry rings which have a decorative feature mounted on a center ring. This invention relates to a finger ring comprising an outer jacket and an inner center ring and, more particularly, to a finger ring, the center ring or plug of which is held contiguous and non-rotating by the configuration to an outer ring. Further, this invention relates generally to rings adapted to be worn on a person's finger, and in particular to a ring comprising detachably coupled members to permit replacement of the members. Moreover, the invention relates to a dual ring set which is generally worn on one finger. The dinner or engagement/wedding ring combination is generally a band with a single ornamental stone, often a diamond or precious gem, or at most a cluster of ornamental stones concentrated in a limited portion of the band and a band with ornamentation with or without gemstones.
A. Problem Addressed:
Common problems in this area are that the old style jackets or band sets would not hold center rings in center of jacket. Therefor a jeweler would have to solder or fasten them together in some manner to keep them lined up. Also, previous jacket rings would not hold a center ring aligned properly. If one has the jacket and center soldered, then once the two rings are together they cannot be separated without un-soldering and re-polishing the separate pieces. These problems and shortfalls are remedied by the interlocking ring system and device with interchangeable outer jackets and center rings presented here and called a TULIP.
This invention addresses these problems by: A new device and system made of durable and formable materials that are configured to lock a center ring into alignment without soldering therefor all center rings and a jacket that have the same locking configuration are fully interchangeable; and a locking shape and configuration which allows all the center rings and jackets to be interchangeable with perfect alignment without soldering the jacket and center ring together.
B. Prior Art
The principal shortcoming of the great bulk of the prior art is that these former developments are not relatively adaptable to interchangeable, cast ring constructions of the type used. For example, this is the case in engagement rings and the like, wherein the annular main body portion is formed integrally with the setting for a gem stone and a separate wedding band or multiple wedding bands are involved. Some basic and typical jewelry designs are shown as prior art in
U.S. Pat. No. 5,228,316 issued to Meyrowitz in 1993 shows a ring of the type adapted to worn on a person's finger is comprised of three distinct ring members. Two of the ring members are engageable for capturing the third ring member and are disengageable to allow the removal and replacement of one or more of the ring members. In one embodiment, a first ring member has substantially cylindrical first and second portions, the second portion being enlarged radially with respect to the first portion to define a first shoulder between the first and second portions. A second ring member has substantially cylindrical third and fourth portions, the fourth portion being enlarged radially with respect to the third portion to define a second shoulder between the second and third portions. The first portion is adapted for mating engagement with the third portion, whereby the first and second ring members are joined together. The third ring member is positionable in concentric relationship with the joined first and third portions. The first and second shoulders are adapted to engage opposed first and second faces of the third ring member, to capture the third ring member between the first and second ring members and in fixed concentric relationship with the joined first and third portions. The first and third portions are disengageable, to accommodate removal of the third ring member. The first, second and third ring members are selectively replaceable. Ring members of various types are selectively combinable to yield multiple ring designs and configurations. This fails to show the interchangeable manner provided by the Murray innovation in that no threaded devices or fastening means is required. Also, Murray has fewer parts. Next, U.S. Pat. No. 5,027,617 issued to Bonchek in 1991 shows a dual ring with protector comprises a pair of rings arranged to be worn together on one finger. One of the pair of rings has an integral protective channel which is adapted to receive the second ring of the pair. The second ring of the pair has ornamentation around its circumference which requires protection from scratching, abrasion, and the possibility that the stones worn facing the inside of the hand will fall out if the gold holding them catches on clothing or hits an object. The protective channel of the first ring is adapted to receive the second ring and protects the complete inner portion, facing the inside of the hand, from wear, scratches, abrasion and the possibility that the stones worn facing the inside of the hand will fall out if the gold holding them catches on clothing or hits an object. This fails to show the interchangeable manner provided by the Murray innovation in that there is not a dual sided jacket nor a containment to prevent the center ring from rotating.
U.S. Pat. No. 4,493,196 issued to Bogner, et al in 1985 shows an improved ring construction suitable for rings, bracelets and similar articles of jewelry, in which a metallic braided decorative strip is underpinned to the outer surface of the ring so that the end and side edgings are shielded from accidental contact during wearing by a user. The ends of the braided strip are enclosed beneath a covering lip forming a part of the ring at each end thereof, while the side edges are covered by planar circular plates soldered to the body of the ring. This fails to show the interchangeable manner provided by the Murray innovation in that there is not a dual sided jacket nor a containment to prevent the center ring from rotating. It also has four versus two active parts. Next U.S. Pat. No. 2,761,294 issued to Lund in 1956 and reissued as RE 24798 shows multi parts with threaded fasteners securing the bands. This fails to show the interchangeable manner provided by the Murray innovation in that Murray requires no fasteners and has fewer parts.
U.S. Pat. No. 2,408,982 issued to Koenig in 1944 shows multiple parts and bands with flip-out portions. This fails to show the interchangeable manner provided by the Murray innovation in that Murray is accomplished with fewer parts and is fully interchangeable within a specific locking shape. Next U.S. Pat. No. 2,262,513 issued to Novack in 1941 shows a one-sided jacket, with a “center ring” beside a band. This fails to show the interchangeable manner provided by the Murray innovation in that the center ring is not in an anti-rotate configuration nor is there full interchangeability.
U.S. Pat. No. 2,151,607 issued to Lovell in 1938 shows multiple parts with a single geometric step locking device. More parts and limited interchangeability is taught. Therefore, it fails to show the interchangeable manner provided by the Murray innovation. Next U.S. Pat. No. 1,822,392 issued to Esterman et al in 1929 shows a finger ring and two side bands. No interchangeability or anti turn, as in Murray, is taught.
Finally, Patent No. EP 0668033 issued to Jimenez in 1995 shows a multiple part ring system. This fails to show the interchangeable manner provided by the Murray innovation and the simplicity of two interlocking components.
As far as known, there are no interlocking ring systems and devices with interchangeable outer jackets and center rings.
It is believed that this product is unique in its design and technologies.
This new device/process may be simply described as: A device for an interlocking ring system made of durable and formable materials that are configured to lock interchangeable outer jackets and interchangeable center rings called a TULIP which is comprised with: (a) a center ring, ornate and decorative or smooth and with or without gemstones, the center ring in various mounting styles such as prong, bezel, pave etc.; and (b) a jacket as an outer band, held together by one or more straps, the jacket being ornate and with or without gemstones and made of the same, complimentary or contrasting materials as the center ring wherein the interchangeable outer jackets and center rings provide an interchangeable, stylish combination of interlocking jackets and center rings called a TULIP.
Advantages and Benefits of the system and interchangeable, interlocking devices:
The accompanying drawings, which are incorporated in and constitute a part of this specification, illustrate an embodiment of the interlocking ring device with an outer jacket and center section with a setting that is preferred. The drawings together with the summary description given above and a detailed description given below serve to explain the principles of the interlocking ring device with an outer jacket and center section with a setting. It is understood, however, that the interlocking ring system and device with interchangeable outer jackets and center rings called a TULIP device is not limited to only the precise arrangements and instrumentalities shown.
The following list refers to the drawings:
The present development is an interlocking ring system and device with interchangeable outer jackets and center rings called a TULIP. This invention relates to jewelry having interchangeable elements and especially to jewelry rings which have a decorative feature mounted into a jacket band. This invention relates to a finger ring comprising an outer jacket and an inner center ring and, more particularly, to a finger ring, the center ring or plug of which is held contiguous and non-rotating by the configuration of an outer ring or jacket. Further, this invention relates generally to rings adapted to be worn on a person's finger, and in particular to a ring comprising detachably coupled members to permit replacement of the members. Moreover, the invention relates to a dual ring set which is generally worn on one finger. More specifically, the invention relates to a pair of rings such as a jacket and a center ring which are generally worn together on one finger. The dinner or engagement/wedding ring combination is generally a band with a single ornamental stone, often a diamond or other precious gemstones, or at most a cluster of ornamental stones concentrated in a limited portion of the band and a band with ornamentation with or without gemstones.
There are shown in
The accompanying drawings, which are incorporated in and constitute a part of this specification, illustrate an embodiment of the interlocking ring system and device 30 with interchangeable outer jackets and center rings called a TULIP. that is preferred. The drawings together with the summary description given above and a detailed description given below serve to explain the principles of an interlocking ring system and device 30 with interchangeable outer jackets and center rings called a TULIP.
There are several advantages of the interlocking ring system and device 30 with interchangeable outer jackets and center rings called a TULIP. Examples of these advantages and not as limitations are that the system and devices:
The preferred embodiment of this system made of durable and formable materials that are configured to be an interlocking and interchangeable ring system and device comprised of: (a) a interchangeable center ring, ornate and decorative or smooth and with or without gemstones, the center ring in various mounting styles such as prong, bezel, pave etc.; and (b) an interchangeable jacket as two outer bands connected by at least one strap, the jacket being ornate and with or without gemstones and made of the same, complimentary or contrasting materials as the center ring wherein the interchangeable outer jackets and center rings provide an interchangeable, stylish combination of interlocking jackets and center rings called a TULIP.
The details mentioned here for the system and device 30 are exemplary and not limiting. Other specific components and manners specific to describing an interlocking ring system and device 30 with interchangeable outer jackets and center rings called a TULIP may be added as a person having ordinary skill in the field of jewelry devices and systems and their uses well appreciates.
The interlocking ring device 30 with an outer jacket 40 and center ring 35 section with a setting has been described in the above embodiment. The manner of how the device operates is described below.
The preferred embodiment of this system and device is an interlocking and interchangeable ring system and device comprised of: (a) a center ring, ornate and decorative or smooth and with or without gemstones, the center ring in various mounting styles such as prong, bezel, pave etc.; and (b) a jacket as two outer bands connected by at least one strap, the jacket being ornate and with or without gemstones and made of the same, complimentary or contrasting materials as the center ring wherein the interchangeable outer jackets and center rings provide an interchangeable, stylish combination of interlocking jackets and center rings called a TULIP.
In
This table is exemplary and not a limitation of the device and system 30. This example shows that with only five different jackets 40 (i.e. 401, 402, 403, 404,and 405) used with the five center rings 35 (i.e. 351, 352, 353, 354, and 355) and two plugs 39 (i.e. 391 and 392), there are essentially thirty five (five (5) jackets times seven (7) center rings and plugs) different combinations available with the interlocking ring system and device 30. One notes that these unique combinations if the TULIP system 30 is selected by the owner for the specific occasion.
While certain novel features of this invention have been shown and described and are pointed out in the annexed claims, it is not intended to be limited to the details above, since it will be understood that various omissions, modifications, substitutions and changes in the forms and details of the device illustrated and in its operation can be made by those skilled in the art without departing in any way from the spirit of the present invention. Without further analysis, the foregoing will so fully reveal the gist of the present invention that others can, by applying current knowledge, readily adapt it for various applications without omitting features that, from the standpoint of prior art, fairly constitute essential characteristics of the generic or specific aspects of this invention.
Unless defined otherwise, all technical and scientific terms used herein have the same meaning as commonly understood by one of ordinary skill in the art to which these inventions belong. Although any methods and materials similar or equivalent to those described herein can also be used in the practice or testing of the present inventions, the preferred methods and materials are now described above in the foregoing paragraphs.
Other embodiments of the invention are possible. Although the description above contains much specificity, these should not be construed as limiting the scope of the invention, but as merely providing illustrations of some of the presently preferred embodiments of this invention. It is also contemplated that various combinations or sub-combinations of the specific features and aspects of the embodiments may be made and still fall within the scope of the inventions. It should be understood that various features and aspects of the disclosed embodiments can be combined with or substituted for one another in order to form varying modes of the disclosed inventions. Thus, it is intended that the scope of at least some of the present inventions herein disclosed should not be limited by the particular disclosed embodiments described above.
The terms recited in the claims should be given their ordinary and customary meaning as determined by reference to relevant entries (e.g., definition of “plane” as a carpenter's tool would not be relevant to the use of the term “plane” when used to refer to an airplane, etc.) in dictionaries (e.g., widely used general reference dictionaries and/or relevant technical dictionaries), commonly understood meanings by those in the art, etc., with the understanding that the broadest meaning imparted by any one or combination of these sources should be given to the claim terms (e.g., two or more relevant dictionary entries should be combined to provide the broadest meaning of the combination of entries, etc.) subject only to the following exceptions: (a) if a term is used herein in a manner more expansive than its ordinary and customary meaning, the term should be given its ordinary and customary meaning plus the additional expansive meaning, or (b) if a term has been explicitly defined to have a different meaning by reciting the term followed by the phrase “as used herein shall mean” or similar language (e.g., “herein this term means,” “as defined herein,” “for the purposes of this disclosure [the term] shall mean,” etc.). References to specific examples, use of “i.e.,” use of the word “invention,” etc., are not meant to invoke exception (b) or otherwise restrict the scope of the recited claim terms. Other than situations where exception (b) applies, nothing contained herein should be considered a disclaimer or disavowal of claim scope. Accordingly, the subject matter recited in the claims is not coextensive with and should not be interpreted to be coextensive with any particular embodiment, feature, or combination of features shown herein. This is true even if only a single embodiment of the particular feature or combination of features is illustrated and described herein. Thus, the appended claims should be read to be given their broadest interpretation in view of the prior art and the ordinary meaning of the claim terms.
Unless otherwise indicated, all numbers or expressions, such as those expressing dimensions, physical characteristics, etc. used in the specification (other than the claims) are understood as modified in all instances by the term “approximately.” At the very least, and not as an attempt to limit the application of the doctrine of equivalents to the claims, each numerical parameter recited in the specification or claims which is modified by the term “approximately” should at least be construed in light of the number of recited significant digits and by applying ordinary rounding techniques.
With this description it is to be understood that the interlocking ring device 30 with an outer jacket 40 and center ring 35 section with a setting is not to be limited to only the disclosed embodiment of product. The features of the interlocking ring device 30 with an outer jacket and center section with a setting are intended to cover various modifications and equivalent arrangements included within the spirit and scope of the description.
This application claims the benefit of Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 61/900,567 filed Nov. 6, 2013 by Todd and Janie Murray and entitled “An Interlocking Ring System and device with Interchangeable Outer Jackets and Center Rings called a TULIP”.
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61900567 | Nov 2013 | US |