Patent Grant
9891612
The present invention relates generally to positioning items. More specifically, an embodiment of the present disclosure relates to an intermediate linear positioning of loads by a linear positioning system.
Generally speaking, linear positioning is useful in a number of technical, industrial and commercial applications. For example, linear positioning of lenses provides zoom focus capability in scanners, which may be used for reading bar code patterns and documents, from which data presented in two dimensional (2D) graphic media may be accessed.
Linear position control is provided by systems that have actuation components (“linear actuators”). The simplest linear actuators move a load item (“load”) from a first position to a second position along an axis of translational motion. The load may also be moved from the second position to the first position.
Some linear actuators may thus be operable in a forward direction (from the first position to the second position) and a reverse direction (from the second position to the first position). Somewhat more complex linear actuator may move the load, forward and reverse, between the first and the second positions, and to one or more additional positions.
For example, linear actuators used with three (3) position mechanical zoom move the load to a third position. The third position may be disposed along the translational axis at an intermediate point between the first position and the second position, which thus correspond to opposite extremes of movement of the load.
The actuator may move the load back and forth between hard stops at each of the first and the second positions, but not beyond either. Further, the actuator may move the load to a hard stop at the intermediate third position, from which it may then move the load to either of the first or the second positions.
The hard stops comprise positions at which the movement of the load is stopped and temporarily constrained from moving further in either direction. The hard stops of the first and the second positions are disposed at opposite fixed positions along the axis, which the linear actuator is constrained not to exceed.
The hard stop of the third position may correspond to a particular intermediate location as precise as the fixed locations of the first and the second positions. However, the actuator is operable for moving the load from the stop at the third intermediate position to the first and/or to the second position.
Lacking the fixed locations of the first and the second positions, the location of the intermediate third position must be designated with a precision level sufficient for a given use application. Effectively reliable linear positioning demands consistent repeatability in the achieving the sufficient precision level.
To attain the consistent repeatability, one or more additional position indicating components (“position sensors”) may typically be used with the linear positioning system. The position sensors are operable for designating the precise location along the linear translational axis at which to stop the load in the intermediate position.
As the actuator moves the load over the linear axis, the position sensor tracks the load's changing position. Upon sensing that the load has been moved into the precise intermediate position, the motion of the load may be selectively stopped, and held in that position for as long a duration as may be selected.
Stopping the load in the first position and the second position is relatively simple, as these opposite motion limits are fixed. The complexity level rises significantly however in relation to stopping the load at the comparatively non-fixed intermediate third position. For example, the sensor first tracks the load as it is moved by the actuator.
Responsive to detecting that the load reaches the intermediate position, the sensor functions to trigger a stoppage of the motion of the load in that position. However, effects such as latency related to combining the operations of the position sensor and triggering the stop may impact the achievable precision level and/or its repeatability.
Moreover, the addition of the position sensors adds cost and complexity to the linear positioning systems. In addition to the impacted precision or reliability, the increased complexity of the linear positioning systems may add concomitant reliability issues or exacerbate existing ones associated therewith.
The additional cost and complexity associated with adding the position sensors to the linear positioning systems may be prohibitive for use in some applications. For example, 3-position mechanical zoom features may add significant functionality to simple, inexpensive optical scan engines, if sufficient precision is achievable consistently.
The linear position control in these scan engines must function at a designated level of precision and repeatability in delineating the intermediate position for stopping the movement of the load by the linear actuators. However, adding position sensors to the linear positioning systems of such scanners raises their cost and complexity prohibitively.
Moreover, latency and other precision and repeatability related effects added by the use of the position sensors with the linear positioning systems may also complicate their design and construction. The added complication may, of course, raise costs further and pose concomitant additional reliability issues.
Therefore, a need exists for moving a load along a linear axis, over which the load may be stopped at least one position disposed at an intermediate point between opposing motion limit positions. A need also exists for moving the load bi-directionally along the linear axis between the at least one intermediate position and the positions of either of the motion limits and to stop at any of the positions, within a repeatable level of precision sufficient for a given use application. Further, a need exists for stopping the movement of the load at the intermediate position, within the sufficient repeatable precision level, independent of any dedicated position sensors.
Accordingly, in one aspect, the present invention embraces a system is described for positioning a load in of multiple positions disposed over a linear axis. A linear actuator moves the load into each of the positions. A first position is at an end of the movement, with a second position opposite. A third position is intermediate between the first and the second positions. A stop actuator is made of a configurable material switchable selectively between an engaged configuration, in which the load is positioned in the at least third position, and a disengaged configuration, in which the load is freely movable between the first and the second positions.
In an example embodiment, the system is used in an optical apparatus, such as a scanner for bar codes and/or other sources of 2D graphic data. The apparatus comprises an assembly of lenses, in which a movable lens comprises the load. The system is operable for positioning the movable lens in the first or second positions, which correspond respectively to an extended range and an ‘HD’ range of high definition and near-field and far-field reading of high density bar codes.—
An example embodiment may be implemented in which the switchably configurable material comprises an electroactive polymer (EAP), which may be active electostrictively. An example embodiment may also be implemented in which the switchably configurable material comprises a shape-memory alloy (SMA). The SMA material may be drawn into a wire or another structure.
In another aspect, the present invention embraces a zoom component, such as for use as a component in an optical or other apparatus.
In an example embodiment, the optical apparatus comprises a scanner for bar codes or other 2D graphic data.
In yet another aspect, the present invention embraces a method for adjusting a focus range of an optical apparatus such as a scanner. A linear actuator is actuated, which is operable for impelling a motion of a movable lens of the optical apparatus over a linear translational axis between a first position on the axis and a second position opposite therefrom. The first and the second positions each comprise limits of the motion of the movable lens in respective opposite directions over the axis.
The method also comprises selectively disengaging a stop actuator, in which the motion of the load is unconstrained between the first the second positions. The method also comprises selectively disengaging a stop actuator, in which the motion of the load is unconstrained between the first the second positions. Positioning the movable lens in the second position corresponds to operating the scanner in the HD focus range.
Further, the method comprises selectively engaging the stop actuator. The engaged stop actuator is operable for positioning the movable lens in at least an intermediate third position disposed along the axis between the first and the second positions. Positioning the movable lens in the intermediate position corresponds to operating the scanner in an SR focus range
The present invention embraces moving a load along a linear axis and stopping the load at one or more intermediate positions disposed between opposite motion limit positions. An example embodiment relates to moving the load bi-directionally along the linear axis between the one or more intermediate positions and the positions of either of the motion limits and stopping the load at any of these positions, within a repeatable level of precision sufficient for a given use application. Moreover, example embodiments stop the movement of the load at the one or more intermediate positions, within the sufficient repeatable precision level, without using a dedicated position sensor.
An example embodiment is described in relation to a system for positioning a load in of multiple positions disposed over a linear axis. A linear actuator moves the load into each of the positions. A first position is at an end of the movement in a first direction, with a second position opposite. A third position is intermediate between the first and the second positions. A stop actuator is made of a configurable material switchable selectively between an engaged configuration, in which the load is positioned in the at least third position, and a disengaged configuration, in which the load is freely movable between the first and the second positions. The load may comprise a movable lens in an optical assembly (e.g., zoom focus) or an apparatus (e.g., a scanner).
To achieve the desired levels of zoom in an optical apparatus, or indeed a desired outcome in any application, example embodiments of the present disclosure allow the actuation functions of linear positioning systems to position items moved therewith within a narrow band of precision, and do so repeatedly.
Scanners are used for reading bar code patterns, imaging documents and accessing 2D data presented with other graphic media. The scanners, and various other optical apparatus, function with associated systems of lenses, operable for collecting and focusing light. Such lens systems have at least a first lens and an image sensor-side lens.
An embodiment of the present invention relates to an optical apparatus and/or a scanner with multiple focusable fields of view (e.g., “zoom”) using a lens system. One or more features of the optical apparatus, the scanner and/or the lens assembly may be implemented as described in U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2014/0084068 by Gillet, et al., which is incorporated by reference for all purposes as if fully set forth herein and any patent(s) that may subsequently or eventually issue in relation thereto.
The first lens is stationary and oriented towards a target object. The first lens thus gathers light incident thereto. The incident light comprises a light beam emitted or reflected by the target object. The first lens focuses the incident light beam upon a focal point disposed along a longitudinal axis of the lens system.
Rays of the beam diverging from the focus are then captured and re-focused by a second sensor side lens upon an image sensor such as a charge coupled device (CCD) image detector array, a complementary metal oxide semiconductor (CMOS) image sensor array, or a detector comprising a photodiode (PD) array. The second sensor side lens is stationary (or perhaps movable only minimally).
A third lens is disposed between the first lens and the second sensor side lens. The third lens is moveable to various positions, which are disposed between the first lens and the second sensor side lens.
Foci of the lens system are adjusted to achieve desired levels of zoom. The foci are adjusted by controlling the position of the moveable third lens, relative to the stationary first lens and second sensor side lens. The movable lens position may be adjusted using a linear positioning system.
The first position 11 is disposed at a first end of the linear axis 14, which corresponds to a limit of the motion of the load 19. The second position 12 is disposed at a second end, opposite to the first end, of the linear axis 14, which corresponds to a limit of the motion of the load 19 in a second direction of motion opposite to the first direction of motion. The plurality of positions also comprises at least a third position 13 disposed along the linear axis at an intermediate point between the first position and the second position.
A stop actuator component 16 of the system 10 comprises a switchably configurable material. The configurable material switches, selectively, between a first ‘disengaged’ configuration and a second ‘engaged’ configuration. In the disengaged (first) configuration, the motion of the load is unconstrained between the first position 11 and the second position 12. In the engaged (second) configuration, the stop actuator 16 is operable for a stopping the motion of the load 19 in the at least third position, where the load 19 remains while the stop actuator 16 is operably engaged.
The linear actuator component 15 may comprise a tiny ultrasonic linear actuator (TULA) device. The switchably configurable material may comprise a metallic composition or a polymeric composition. An example embodiment may be implemented in which the switchably configurable material of the stop actuator 16 comprises an electroactive polymer (EAP) such an electrostrictive polymer. An example embodiment may also be implemented in which the switchably configurable material comprises a shape-memory alloy (SMA). A form of the SMA material may be fabricated as a gate structure, or as a wire structure.
In an example embodiment, the load 19 comprises a movable lens in a zoom focus element of an optical apparatus. The zoom focus element is operable selectively over an HD focus range of high definition and near-field and far-field reading of high density bar codes.
The zoom focus element comprises a first lens, fixed in proximity to the second position, and an image sensor-side lens, fixed in proximity to the first position. The position in which the movable lens is stopped corresponds to the focus range selected, over which the zoom focus is operable.
For example, upon a stop of the movable lens in the first position, the zoom element is operable in the ER. Upon a stop of the movable lens in the second position, the zoom element is operable in the SR. Upon the stopping the motion of the load in the at least third position, the zoom element is operable in the HD focus range. The stop actuator 16 is operable for stopping the movable lens in the intermediate position with a level of precision sufficient for use in repeatably accurate and reliable optical scan operations, without cost and/or complexity associated with alternative use of intermediate position indicating means.
Linear positioning system 10 may comprise one or more additional stop actuator components and the plurality of positions may comprise one or more respectively corresponding intermediate positions along the linear axis 14. The additional intermediate positions are disposed between the third position and either the first position, or the second position. Each of the additional stop actuator components comprises one of the switchably configurable materials, and each is operable in its engaged (second) configuration for stopping the motion of the load 19 at the respectively corresponding additional position.
With the motion limit selection 29, the switching mechanism 25 switches the configurable material 25 into a ‘disengage’ configuration 27. Thus, the stop actuator 16 is disengaged and freely allows the load 19 to move, unconstrained, between the first position 11 and the second position 22, or vice versa.
With the intermediate position selection 21, the switching mechanism 25 switches the configurable material 25 into an ‘engage’ configuration 22. Thus, the stop actuator 16 is engaged and stops the load 19 in the intermediate position.
Switching the dimorphic material 26 between the engage configuration and the disengage configuration comprises selectively changing its shape between each of two contours respectively corresponding to each.
With EAP materials, the switching mechanism 25 is operable for selectively changing the shape of the dimorphic material by varying an electrostatic field in which the EAP is disposed piezoelectrically. With SMA materials, the switching mechanism 25 is operable for selectively changing the shape of the dimorphic material between a native, initial and/or non-deformed contour and a deformed contour by means of a thermomechanical mechanism.
As used herein, the term ‘thermomechanical’ refers to mechanical means (e.g., deformation, spring loading), used in combination with heating and cooling. The thermomechanical mechanism manipulates the internal microstructure and corresponding metallurgical characteristics of the SMA material. The thermomechanical mechanism, for example, effectuates transitions between austenite and martensite crystal lattice structures of the SMA, which change the shape of the dimorphic component 25.
Selecting for the linear actuator 15 to position the load 19 in the first position 11 or the second position 12, the motion limit selector 29 is operable for switching the configurable material 26 of stop actuator 16 accordingly. The switching mechanism 25 thus operates as the motion limit selector 29 to provide a ‘disengage’ selection 27, based on which the switchably configurable material 26 is switched to configure the stop actuator 16 to disengage. Disengaging the stop actuator 16 allows the linear actuator 15 to move the load 19 freely, unconstrained between the first position 11 and the second position 12.
Selecting for positioning the load 19 in the intermediate third position 13, the motion limit selector 29 is operable for switching the configurable material 26 of stop actuator 16 accordingly. The switching mechanism 25 operates as the intermediate position selector 21 to provide an ‘engage’ selection 22, based on which the switchably configurable material 26 is switched to configure the stop actuator 16 to engage. Upon engagement, the stop actuator 16 is operable for a stopping the motion of the load 19 in the at least third position 13, where the load 19 remains while the stop actuator 16 is operably engaged.
As the engagement of the stop actuator 16 halts the motion of the load 19 in the at least third position 13, where the load 19 remains while the stop actuator 16 is operably engaged, an example embodiment may thus be implemented to configure an SR focus range for the zoom focus element in the optical apparatus.
Thus, a system is described for positioning a load in of multiple positions disposed over a linear axis. A linear actuator moves the load into each of the positions. A first position is at an end of the movement, with a second position opposite. A third position is intermediate between the first and the second positions. A stop actuator is made of a configurable material switchable selectively between an engaged configuration, in which the load is positioned in the at least third position, and a disengaged configuration, in which the load is freely movable between the first and the second positions.
An example embodiment is described in relation to an optical assembly, which is adjustable, selectively, over at least three focus ranges.
The optical assembly 30 comprises a first lens 37, which is fixed in proximity to the second position 12. The optical assembly 30 also comprises an image sensor-side (“ocular”) lens 38 fixed in proximity to the first position 11, which is disposed at an opposite end of a linear axis of the optical assembly 30 from the first position and in proximity with an image detector 402, such as a CCD, etc.
Further, the optical assembly 30 comprises a lens 39, which is movable controllably over the linear axis between the first position 11 and the second position 12. Positioning the movable lens 39 in the second position 12 selects an HD focus range of high definition and near-field and far-field reading of high density bar codes for the optical assembly 30. Positioning of the movable lens 39 in the first position 11 selects an extended focus range (ER) of the optical assembly 30.
The third position 13 is disposed between the first position 11 and the second position 12. Positioning the movable lens 39 in the third position 13 selects a corresponding SR focus range.
In an example embodiment, one or more features of the optical assembly 30 may be implemented as described in the incorporated reference: U.S. Pat. Appl. Pub. No. 2014/0084068 by Gillet, et al.
The optical assembly 30 comprises a zoom mechanism operable for positioning the movable lens 39, selectively, over the first position 11, the second position 12, and the third position 13. The zoom mechanism comprises a linear actuator device 15, and a stop actuator device 16. The stop actuator device 16 comprises a switchably configurable material.
The switchably configurable material switches selectively between a first configuration and a second configuration. Switched into the first configuration, the motion of the movable lens 39 load is unconstrained between the first position 11 and the second position 12. In the second configuration, the motion of the movable lens is stopped, at least temporarily, in the third position 13.
The movable lens 39 comprises a load, which is positioned, selectively, by the linear actuator (e.g., TULA) 15 of an associated linear positioning system. The TULA 15 is operable for moving the moveable lens 39 into position 11, position 12 and position 13, which are disposed over an axis of translational operation of the TULA 15 within the optical assembly 30.
The first lens 37 gathers incident light, which it focuses into the optical assembly 30 along its longitudinal axis. The focused light is refocused by the movable lens 39 onto the ocular lens 38. The ocular lens 38 further refocuses the light onto the image detector 402. The image detector 402 may comprise a charge coupled device (CCD), complementary metal oxide semiconductor (CMOS), or photodiode (PD) array to allow capture of images scanned by the optical apparatus.
In
The optical apparatus 40 comprises an optics system 41 with multiple lens components. The optics system 41 may also comprise other optical components, such as one or more prisms, mirrors and/or filters.
Among its multiple lens components, the optics system 41 comprises the first lens 37, the ocular lens 38 and the movable lens 39 of the zoom optical assembly 30. The movement and stops of the movable lens 39 are effectuated, respectively, by the linear actuator 15 and the stop actuator 16 of the linear positioning system 10.
An example embodiment may be implemented in which the selectively configurable material of the stop actuator 16 comprises an electroactive polymer (EAP), with functional electrostrictive properties. Example embodiments may also be implemented in which the selectively configurable material comprises a shape-memory alloy (SMA). The SMA may be fabricated into a functional wire-based structure or a formed structure, which may be operable as a mechanical gate, detent, or arrester.
In an example embodiment, one or more features of the optical apparatus 40 may be implemented as described in the incorporated reference: U.S. Pat. Appl. Pub. No. 2014/0084068 by Gillet, et al.
An example embodiment may be implemented in which the scanner 40 comprises a light source 401, the image sensor 402, an aperture controller 403, a range finder 404, one or more processors 406 (e.g., microprocessor or microcontroller), one or more memory (and/or other data storage) units 407, input/output (I/O) devices 408, an interface 409, and at least one power supply 409. The scanner 40 may also have a bus 405, which provides for the exchange of data signals between its other components. The bus 405 also allows for the power supply 409 to power the other components of the scanner 40.
The light source 401 comprises a laser, light emitting diode (LED), or another light emitter and is operable for illuminating barcodes, other symbols and data arrays, documents and other scan targets. The aperture controller 403 may comprises an iris or other device for setting a level of collimation for light gathered by the first lens for admission into the optics system 41. The range finder 404 may comprise radar, LIDAR (or other laser-related), or sonar related means, for determining a distance from the scanner 40 to a target scan object.
The one or more processors 405 may be used for running program applications associated with the scanner 40. The one or more memory units 407 may comprise any non-transitory computer readable storage medium, including random-access memory (RAM), read-only memory (ROM), any combination of volatile and non-volatile memory, and/or drive devices (e.g., hard drives and/or flash devices). The non-transitory computer readable storage media comprise instructions tangibly stored therewith, which when executed by the processor(s) 405, control processes for functions by which the scanner 40 is operable. The processes may comprise a method for adjusting a focus range of the zoom optical assembly 30.
The I/O devices 408 may comprise triggers for starting and stopping the scanner 40 and controlling the zoom optical system 30, including the linear positioning system 10. The triggers may also initiate or control other functions of the scanner 40. The interface 409 may comprise means for effectuating network interactions and/or communicative coupling, via wireless and/or wireline means, with an external computer 499 and with visual displays, audio transducers, and communication devices. The power supply 409 may comprise a battery and/or means for coupling to an external power source.
The scanner 40 may be implemented in a mobile, portable and/or handheld unit, a fixed or vehicle-mounted unit, a universal or other barcode reader. Additionally or alternatively, the scanner 40 may be implemented in a portable data terminal (PDT), mobile phones, smart phones, tablet computers, laptop computers, “Ultrabooks™,” personal digital assistants (PDAs), vehicle-based computers, etc.
The gate 55 comprises the switchably configurable SMA based material of the stop actuator device 50 and represents the dimorphic component (e.g., dimorphic component 26;
A switching mechanism (e.g., 25;
With the motion limit selector operable, the configurable material gate 55 is switched into a ‘disengage’ configuration. Thus, the stop actuator 50 is disengaged and freely allows a load (e.g., 19;
With the intermediate position selector operable, the configurable material gate 55 is switched into an ‘engage’ configuration. Thus, the stop actuator 50 is engaged and is operable for stopping the load in the intermediate position.
Switching the dimorphic SMA material of the gate 55 between the engage configuration and the disengage configuration of the stop actuator 50 relates to selectively changing its shape between respective corresponding contours. With the SMA material of the gate 55, the switching mechanism of the stop actuator 50 is operable for selectively changing the shape of the dimorphic SMA material between a native, initial and/or non-deformed contour and a deformed contour by means of a thermomechanical mechanism.
The gate 65 comprises a wire form (e.g., including the coiled portion) of the switchably configurable SMA based material and represents the dimorphic component (e.g., dimorphic component 26;
A switching mechanism (e.g., switching mechanism 25;
With the motion limit selector operable, the configurable material gate 65 is switched into a ‘disengage’ configuration (e.g., 27). Thus, the stop actuator 50 is disengaged and freely allows a load (e.g., 19;
With the intermediate position selector operable, the configurable SMA wire material gate 65 is switched into an ‘engage’ configuration. Thus, the stop actuator 60 is engaged and is operable for stopping the load in the intermediate position.
Switching the dimorphic SMA material of the gate 65 between the engage configuration and the disengage configuration of the stop actuator 60 relates to selectively changing its shape between respective corresponding contours.
With the SMA wire material of the gate 65, the switching mechanism of the stop actuator 60 is operable for selectively changing the shape of the dimorphic SMA material between a native, initial and/or non-deformed contour and a deformed contour by means of a thermomechanical mechanism.
The gate 75 comprises an electrostrictive polymer, fabricated into a switchably configurable EAP based dimorphic component (e.g., dimorphic component 26;
A switching mechanism (e.g., switching mechanism 25;
With the motion limit selector operable, the configurable EAP material gate 75 is switched into a ‘disengage’ configuration (e.g., 27). Thus, the stop actuator 70 is disengaged and freely allows a load (e.g., 19;
With the intermediate position selector operable, the configurable EAP material gate 75 is switched into an ‘engage’ configuration. Thus, the stop actuator 70 is engaged and is operable for stopping the load in the intermediate position.
Switching the dimorphic SMA material of the gate 75 between the engage configuration and the disengage configuration of the stop actuator 70 relates to selectively changing its shape between respective corresponding contours.
With the electrostrictive EAP material of the gate 75, the switching mechanism of the stop actuator 70 is operable for selectively changing the shape of the dimorphic EAP material between a relaxed contour and a strained contour by varying an electrostatic field in which the dimorphic EAP component is disposed. An example embodiment may be implemented in which the electrostatic field is varied by a piezoelectric mechanism.
The linear positioning system 80 is operable for moving a load 89, such as a movable lens in an optical zoom lens assembly, over the linear axis of motion 14. The linear positioning system 80 comprises a linear actuator component 85. The linear actuator 85 is operable, controllably, for moving the load 89 into a plurality of positions disposed over the linear axis 14, which relates to a motion of the load 89. The plurality of positions comprises a first position 11 and a second position 12.
The first position 11 is disposed at the first end of the linear axis 14 and corresponding to a limit of the motion of the load 89 in a first direction. The second position 12 is disposed at a second end, opposite to the first end, of the linear axis 14 and corresponds to a limit of the motion of the load 89 in a second direction, opposite to the first direction of motion. The plurality of positions also comprises a third position 13 disposed along the linear axis at a first intermediate point between the first position 11 and the second position 12.
Further, the plurality of positions also comprises at least one additional intermediate position 87. The at least one additional intermediate position 87 is disposed along the linear axis 14 at one or more respective intermediate points between the third position 13 and the first position 11, or between the third position 13 and the second position 12. Thus, the plurality of positions may comprise a total number N of intermediate positions, in which ‘N’ comprises a positive whole number greater than or equal to one (1).
The stop actuator component 16 comprises the switchably configurable material. The configurable material switches, selectively, between the first disengaged configuration and the second engaged configuration. In the disengaged configuration, the motion of the load 89 is unconstrained between the first position 11 and the second position 12. In the engaged (second) configuration, the stop actuator 16 is operable for a stopping the motion of the load 89 in the at least third position, where the load 19 remains while the stop actuator 16 is operably engaged.
The linear positioning system 80 also comprises at least one additional stop actuator component 861, which corresponds respectively to the at least one additional position 87. Thus, the linear positioning system 80 may comprise a total number of stop actuator components equal to the respective number N of intermediate positions.
Like the stop actuator 16, the stop actuator 861 comprises the switchably configurable material and is operable in the second configuration thereof for stopping the motion of the load 89 in the at least one additional position 87 corresponding respectively thereto.
Like the stop actuator 16, the stop actuator component 861 comprises the switchably configurable EAP or SMA material. The configurable material switches, selectively, between the first disengaged configuration and the second engaged configuration. In the disengaged configuration, the motion of the load 89 is unconstrained between the first position 11 and the second position 12. In the engaged configuration, the stop actuator 861 is operable for a stopping the motion of the load 89 in the at least one additional position 87, where the load 89 remains while the stop actuator 861 is operably engaged.
The linear actuator component 85 may comprise a TULA device. The switchably configurable material of the stop actuators 861 and 16 may the EAP composition or the SMA composition. The form of the SMA material may be fabricated as the formed gate structure, or as the wire structure.
In an example embodiment, the load 89 comprises a movable lens in a zoom focus element of an optical apparatus such as a scanner. The zoom focus element is operable selectively over the SR, the ER, and the HD focus range, as well as at least one additional range. The zoom focus element comprises the first lens, fixed in proximity to the second position, and the second sensor side lens, fixed in proximity to the first position. The position in which the movable lens load 89 is stopped corresponds to the focus range selected, over which the zoom focus is operable.
For example, upon the stop of the movable lens load 89 in the first position 11, the zoom element is operable in the ER. Upon the stop of the movable lens in the second position 12, the zoom element is operable in the HD focus range. Upon the stopping the motion of the movable lens 89 in the intermediate position 13, the zoom element is operable in the SR focus range.
Upon the stopping the motion of the movable lens 89 in the at least one intermediate position 87, the zoom element is operable in the at least one additional focus range. The stop actuators 861 and 16 are operable for stopping the movable lens in the intermediate positions 87 and 13, respectively, with a level of precision sufficient for use in repeatably accurate and reliable optical scan operations, without cost and/or complexity associated with alternative use of intermediate position indicating means.
The linear positioning system 80 may comprise one or more additional stop actuator components and the plurality of positions may comprise one or more respectively corresponding intermediate positions along the linear axis 14. The further additional intermediate positions are disposed between the third position and either the first position, or the second position. Each of the additional stop actuator components comprises one of the switchably configurable materials, and each is operable in its engaged configuration for stopping the motion of the load 89 at the respectively corresponding additional position.
An example embodiment may be implemented, alternatively, with a single stop actuator. For example, the stop actuator 16 may be moved from the first position 11 by a stop actuator linear positioning system 88. The stop actuator linear positioning system 88 may also comprise a TULA.
In a step 91, a linear actuator such as a TULA is activated for impelling a motion of a movable lens over a linear translational axis between first and second positions. The first and second positions are disposed at opposite ends of the axis and correspond to respective limits of the motion of the lens in opposite directions.
With the movable lens positioned in the first position, the zoom focus assembly provides an extended focus range (ER). With the movable lens positioned in the second position, the zoom focus assembly provides an HD. With the movable lens positioned in the intermediate position between the first and second positions, the zoom focus assembly provides an SR focus range.
In a step 92, it is determined whether the SR range is being selected.
If the SR focal range is not selected, then in a step 93, a stop actuator is disengaged and the movable lens is moved freely by the TULA, unconstrained from the first position to the second position, from the second position to the first position, or from an intermediate position to either the first or the second positions.
If the SR range selected, then in a step 94, the stop actuator is engaged for positioning the movable lens in a selected intermediate position between the first and the second positions. The selected SR focus range provides both near-field and far-field reading high-density bar codes, and/or over a range of heightened definition, relative to the HD or the ER ranges.
Thus, an example embodiment is described in relation to a method for adjusting a focus range of an optical apparatus such as a scanner. The method comprises activating a linear actuator operable for impelling a motion of a movable lens of the optical apparatus over a linear translational axis between a first position on the axis and a second position opposite therefrom. The first and the second positions each comprise limits of the motion of the movable lens in respective opposite directions over the axis.
The method also comprises selectively disengaging a stop actuator, in which the motion of the load is unconstrained between the first the second positions. Positioning the movable lens in the second position corresponds to operating the scanner in the HD focus range. Positioning the movable lens in the first position corresponds to operating the scanner in the ER focus range.
Further, the method comprises selectively engaging the stop actuator. The engaged stop actuator is operable for positioning the movable lens in at least an intermediate third position disposed along the axis between the first and the second positions. Positioning the movable lens in the intermediate position corresponds to operating the scanner in an SR focus range.
The switchably configurable material may comprise a dimorphic component of the stop actuator. The dimorphic component comprises a first shape corresponding to the disengaging step, and a second shape corresponding to the engaging step. The disengaging step and the engaging step respectively comprise switching the dimorphic component selectively between the corresponding first shape and the second shape.
The switchably configurable material may comprise an EAP. The EAP may comprise an electostrictive polymer. The selective switching of the EAP may relate to varying an electrostatic field in proximity to the dimorphic component using a piezoelectric mechanism.
Alternatively, the switchably configurable material may comprise an SMA. Selectively switching the SMA may relate to adjusting a deformation in a configuration of the dimorphic component using a thermomechanical mechanism.
Example embodiments of the present invention are thus described in relation to a system is disclosed for positioning a load in of multiple positions disposed over a linear axis. A linear actuator moves the load into each of the positions. A first position is at an end of the movement, with a second position opposite. A third position is intermediate between the first and the second positions. A stop actuator is made of a configurable material switchable selectively between an engaged configuration, in which the load is positioned in the at least third position, and a disengaged configuration, in which the load is freely movable between the first and the second positions.
To supplement the present disclosure, this application incorporates entirely by reference the following commonly assigned patents, patent application publications, and patent applications:
In the specification and/or figures, example embodiments of the invention have been described in relation to a process is described for scanning a scan target related to an electronic display or a print based graphic medium. An image of the scan target is captured over an exposure duration and with an illumination activated at a fixed lighting intensity level and for a set illumination duration. The set illumination duration corresponds to a mere fraction of the exposure duration. The illumination deactivates upon expiration of the illumination duration. A quality related characteristic of the captured image is evaluated relative to a target quality metric.
The present invention is not limited to such example embodiments. Embodiments of the present invention also relate to equivalents of the examples described herein. The use of the term “and/or” includes any and all combinations of one or more of the associated listed items. The figures are schematic representations and so are not necessarily drawn to scale. Unless otherwise noted, specific terms have been used in a generic and descriptive sense and not for purposes of limitation.
An example embodiment of the present invention relates to a system for positioning a load in of multiple positions disposed over a linear axis. A linear actuator moves the load into each of the positions. A first position is at an end of the movement, with a second position opposite. A third position is intermediate between the first and the second positions. A stop actuator is made of a configurable material switchable selectively between an engaged configuration, in which the load is positioned in the at least third position, and a disengaged configuration, in which the load is freely movable between the first and the second positions.
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 5546238 | Devenyi | Aug 1996 | A |
| 6832725 | Gardiner et al. | Dec 2004 | B2 |
| 7128266 | Marlton et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
| 7159783 | Walczyk et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
| 7413127 | Ehrhart et al. | Aug 2008 | B2 |
| 7726575 | Wang et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
| 7953319 | Tanimura | May 2011 | B2 |
| 8294969 | Plesko | Oct 2012 | B2 |
| 8317105 | Kotlarsky et al. | Nov 2012 | B2 |
| 8322622 | Suzhou et al. | Dec 2012 | B2 |
| 8366005 | Kotlarsky et al. | Feb 2013 | B2 |
| 8371507 | Haggerty et al. | Feb 2013 | B2 |
| 8376233 | Van Horn et al. | Feb 2013 | B2 |
| 8381979 | Franz | Feb 2013 | B2 |
| 8390909 | Plesko | Mar 2013 | B2 |
| 8408464 | Zhu et al. | Apr 2013 | B2 |
| 8408468 | Horn et al. | Apr 2013 | B2 |
| 8408469 | Good | Apr 2013 | B2 |
| 8424768 | Rueblinger et al. | Apr 2013 | B2 |
| 8448863 | Xian et al. | May 2013 | B2 |
| 8457013 | Essinger et al. | Jun 2013 | B2 |
| 8459557 | Havens et al. | Jun 2013 | B2 |
| 8469272 | Kearney | Jun 2013 | B2 |
| 8474712 | Kearney et al. | Jul 2013 | B2 |
| 8479992 | Kotlarsky et al. | Jul 2013 | B2 |
| 8490877 | Kearney | Jul 2013 | B2 |
| 8517271 | Kotlarsky et al. | Aug 2013 | B2 |
| 8523076 | Good | Sep 2013 | B2 |
| 8528818 | Ehrhart et al. | Sep 2013 | B2 |
| 8544737 | Gomez et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
| 8548420 | Grunow et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
| 8550335 | Samek et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
| 8550354 | Gannon et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
| 8550357 | Kearney | Oct 2013 | B2 |
| 8556174 | Kosecki et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
| 8556176 | Van Horn et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
| 8556177 | Hussey et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
| 8559767 | Barber et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
| 8561895 | Gomez et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
| 8561903 | Sauerwein | Oct 2013 | B2 |
| 8561905 | Edmonds et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
| 8565107 | Pease et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
| 8571307 | Li et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
| 8579200 | Samek et al. | Nov 2013 | B2 |
| 8583924 | Caballero et al. | Nov 2013 | B2 |
| 8584945 | Wang et al. | Nov 2013 | B2 |
| 8587595 | Wang | Nov 2013 | B2 |
| 8587697 | Hussey et al. | Nov 2013 | B2 |
| 8588869 | Sauerwein et al. | Nov 2013 | B2 |
| 8590789 | Nahill et al. | Nov 2013 | B2 |
| 8596539 | Havens et al. | Dec 2013 | B2 |
| 8596542 | Havens et al. | Dec 2013 | B2 |
| 8596543 | Havens et al. | Dec 2013 | B2 |
| 8599271 | Havens et al. | Dec 2013 | B2 |
| 8599957 | Peake et al. | Dec 2013 | B2 |
| 8600158 | Li et al. | Dec 2013 | B2 |
| 8600167 | Showering | Dec 2013 | B2 |
| 8602309 | Longacre et al. | Dec 2013 | B2 |
| 8608053 | Meier et al. | Dec 2013 | B2 |
| 8608071 | Liu et al. | Dec 2013 | B2 |
| 8611309 | Wang et al. | Dec 2013 | B2 |
| 8615487 | Gomez et al. | Dec 2013 | B2 |
| 8621123 | Caballero | Dec 2013 | B2 |
| 8622303 | Meier et al. | Jan 2014 | B2 |
| 8628013 | Ding | Jan 2014 | B2 |
| 8628015 | Wang et al. | Jan 2014 | B2 |
| 8628016 | Winegar | Jan 2014 | B2 |
| 8629926 | Wang | Jan 2014 | B2 |
| 8630491 | Longacre et al. | Jan 2014 | B2 |
| 8635309 | Berthiaume et al. | Jan 2014 | B2 |
| 8636200 | Kearney | Jan 2014 | B2 |
| 8636212 | Nahill et al. | Jan 2014 | B2 |
| 8636215 | Ding et al. | Jan 2014 | B2 |
| 8636224 | Wang | Jan 2014 | B2 |
| 8638806 | Wang et al. | Jan 2014 | B2 |
| 8640958 | Lu et al. | Feb 2014 | B2 |
| 8640960 | Wang et al. | Feb 2014 | B2 |
| 8643717 | Li et al. | Feb 2014 | B2 |
| 8646692 | Meier et al. | Feb 2014 | B2 |
| 8646694 | Wang et al. | Feb 2014 | B2 |
| 8657200 | Ren et al. | Feb 2014 | B2 |
| 8659397 | Vargo et al. | Feb 2014 | B2 |
| 8668149 | Good | Mar 2014 | B2 |
| 8678285 | Kearney | Mar 2014 | B2 |
| 8678286 | Smith et al. | Mar 2014 | B2 |
| 8682077 | Longacre | Mar 2014 | B1 |
| D702237 | Oberpriller et al. | Apr 2014 | S |
| 8687282 | Feng et al. | Apr 2014 | B2 |
| 8692927 | Pease et al. | Apr 2014 | B2 |
| 8695880 | Bremer et al. | Apr 2014 | B2 |
| 8698949 | Grunow et al. | Apr 2014 | B2 |
| 8702000 | Barber et al. | Apr 2014 | B2 |
| 8717494 | Gannon | May 2014 | B2 |
| 8720783 | Biss et al. | May 2014 | B2 |
| 8723804 | Fletcher et al. | May 2014 | B2 |
| 8723904 | Marty et al. | May 2014 | B2 |
| 8727223 | Wang | May 2014 | B2 |
| 8740082 | Wilz | Jun 2014 | B2 |
| 8740085 | Furlong et al. | Jun 2014 | B2 |
| 8746563 | Hennick et al. | Jun 2014 | B2 |
| 8750445 | Peake et al. | Jun 2014 | B2 |
| 8752766 | Xian et al. | Jun 2014 | B2 |
| 8756059 | Braho et al. | Jun 2014 | B2 |
| 8757495 | Qu et al. | Jun 2014 | B2 |
| 8760563 | Koziol et al. | Jun 2014 | B2 |
| 8736909 | Reed et al. | Jul 2014 | B2 |
| 8777108 | Coyle | Jul 2014 | B2 |
| 8777109 | Oberpriller et al. | Jul 2014 | B2 |
| 8779898 | Havens et al. | Jul 2014 | B2 |
| 8781520 | Payne et al. | Jul 2014 | B2 |
| 8783573 | Havens et al. | Jul 2014 | B2 |
| 8789757 | Barten | Jul 2014 | B2 |
| 8789758 | Hawley et al. | Jul 2014 | B2 |
| 8789759 | Xian et al. | Jul 2014 | B2 |
| 8794520 | Wang et al. | Aug 2014 | B2 |
| 8794522 | Ehrhart | Aug 2014 | B2 |
| 8794525 | Amundsen et al. | Aug 2014 | B2 |
| 8794526 | Wang et al. | Aug 2014 | B2 |
| 8798367 | Ellis | Aug 2014 | B2 |
| 8807431 | Wang et al. | Aug 2014 | B2 |
| 8807432 | Van Horn et al. | Aug 2014 | B2 |
| 8820630 | Qu et al. | Sep 2014 | B2 |
| 8822848 | Meagher | Sep 2014 | B2 |
| 8824692 | Sheerin et al. | Sep 2014 | B2 |
| 8824696 | Braho | Sep 2014 | B2 |
| 8842849 | Wahl et al. | Sep 2014 | B2 |
| 8844822 | Kotlarsky et al. | Sep 2014 | B2 |
| 8844823 | Fritz et al. | Sep 2014 | B2 |
| 8849019 | Li et al. | Sep 2014 | B2 |
| D716285 | Chaney et al. | Oct 2014 | S |
| 8851383 | Yeakley et al. | Oct 2014 | B2 |
| 8854633 | Laffargue et al. | Oct 2014 | B2 |
| 8863913 | Jang | Oct 2014 | B2 |
| 8866963 | Grunow et al. | Oct 2014 | B2 |
| 8868421 | Braho et al. | Oct 2014 | B2 |
| 8868519 | Maloy et al. | Oct 2014 | B2 |
| 8868802 | Barten | Oct 2014 | B2 |
| 8868803 | Bremer et al. | Oct 2014 | B2 |
| 8870074 | Gannon | Oct 2014 | B1 |
| 8879639 | Sauerwein | Nov 2014 | B2 |
| 8880426 | Smith | Nov 2014 | B2 |
| 8881983 | Havens et al. | Nov 2014 | B2 |
| 8881987 | Wang | Nov 2014 | B2 |
| 8903172 | Smith | Dec 2014 | B2 |
| 8908995 | Benos et al. | Dec 2014 | B2 |
| 8910870 | Li et al. | Dec 2014 | B2 |
| 8910875 | Ren et al. | Dec 2014 | B2 |
| 8914290 | Hendrickson et al. | Dec 2014 | B2 |
| 8914788 | Pettinelli et al. | Dec 2014 | B2 |
| 8915439 | Feng et al. | Dec 2014 | B2 |
| 8915444 | Havens et al. | Dec 2014 | B2 |
| 8916789 | Woodburn | Dec 2014 | B2 |
| 8918250 | Hollifield | Dec 2014 | B2 |
| 8918564 | Caballero | Dec 2014 | B2 |
| 8925818 | Kosecki et al. | Jan 2015 | B2 |
| 8939374 | Jovanovski et al. | Jan 2015 | B2 |
| 8942480 | Ellis | Jan 2015 | B2 |
| 8944313 | Williams et al. | Feb 2015 | B2 |
| 8944327 | Meier et al. | Feb 2015 | B2 |
| 8944332 | Harding et al. | Feb 2015 | B2 |
| 8950678 | Germaine et al. | Feb 2015 | B2 |
| D723560 | Zhou et al. | Mar 2015 | S |
| 8967468 | Gomez et al. | Mar 2015 | B2 |
| 8971346 | Sevier | Mar 2015 | B2 |
| 8976030 | Cunningham et al. | Mar 2015 | B2 |
| 8976368 | Akel et al. | Mar 2015 | B2 |
| 8978981 | Guan | Mar 2015 | B2 |
| 8978983 | Bremer et al. | Mar 2015 | B2 |
| 8978984 | Hennick et al. | Mar 2015 | B2 |
| 8985456 | Zhu et al. | Mar 2015 | B2 |
| 8985457 | Soule et al. | Mar 2015 | B2 |
| 8985459 | Kearney et al. | Mar 2015 | B2 |
| 8985461 | Gelay et al. | Mar 2015 | B2 |
| 8988578 | Showering | Mar 2015 | B2 |
| 8988590 | Gillet et al. | Mar 2015 | B2 |
| 8991704 | Hopper et al. | Mar 2015 | B2 |
| 8996194 | Davis et al. | Mar 2015 | B2 |
| 8996384 | Funyak et al. | Mar 2015 | B2 |
| 8998091 | Edmonds et al. | Apr 2015 | B2 |
| 9002641 | Showering | Apr 2015 | B2 |
| 9007368 | Laffargue et al. | Apr 2015 | B2 |
| 9010641 | Qu et al. | Apr 2015 | B2 |
| 9015513 | Murawski et al. | Apr 2015 | B2 |
| 9016576 | Brady et al. | Apr 2015 | B2 |
| D730357 | Fitch et al. | May 2015 | S |
| 9022288 | Nahill et al. | May 2015 | B2 |
| 9030964 | Essinger et al. | May 2015 | B2 |
| 9033240 | Smith et al. | May 2015 | B2 |
| 9033242 | Gillet et al. | May 2015 | B2 |
| 9036054 | Koziol et al. | May 2015 | B2 |
| 9037344 | Chamberlin | May 2015 | B2 |
| 9038911 | Xian et al. | May 2015 | B2 |
| 9038915 | Smith | May 2015 | B2 |
| D730901 | Oberpriller et al. | Jun 2015 | S |
| D730902 | Fitch et al. | Jun 2015 | S |
| D733112 | Chaney et al. | Jun 2015 | S |
| 9047098 | Barten | Jun 2015 | B2 |
| 9047359 | Caballero et al. | Jun 2015 | B2 |
| 9047420 | Caballero | Jun 2015 | B2 |
| 9047525 | Barber et al. | Jun 2015 | B2 |
| 9047531 | Showering et al. | Jun 2015 | B2 |
| 9049640 | Wang et al. | Jun 2015 | B2 |
| 9053055 | Caballero | Jun 2015 | B2 |
| 9053378 | Hou et al. | Jun 2015 | B1 |
| 9053380 | Xian et al. | Jun 2015 | B2 |
| 9057641 | Amundsen et al. | Jun 2015 | B2 |
| 9058526 | Powilleit | Jun 2015 | B2 |
| 9064165 | Havens et al. | Jun 2015 | B2 |
| 9064167 | Xian et al. | Jun 2015 | B2 |
| 9064168 | Todeschini et al. | Jun 2015 | B2 |
| 9064254 | Todeschini et al. | Jun 2015 | B2 |
| 9066032 | Wang | Jun 2015 | B2 |
| 9070032 | Corcoran | Jun 2015 | B2 |
| D734339 | Zhou et al. | Jul 2015 | S |
| D734751 | Oberpriller et al. | Jul 2015 | S |
| 9082023 | Feng et al. | Jul 2015 | B2 |
| 20030206736 | Nishina | Nov 2003 | A1 |
| 20060098968 | Ito | May 2006 | A1 |
| 20060208609 | Heim | Sep 2006 | A1 |
| 20070063048 | Havens et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
| 20080212212 | Matsuki et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
| 20090134221 | Zhu et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
| 20090168198 | Perreault | Jul 2009 | A1 |
| 20100177076 | Essinger et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
| 20100177080 | Essinger et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
| 20100177707 | Essinger et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
| 20100177749 | Essinger et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
| 20110169999 | Grunow et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
| 20110202554 | Powilleit et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
| 20120106936 | Lim | May 2012 | A1 |
| 20120111946 | Golant | May 2012 | A1 |
| 20120168512 | Kotlarsky et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
| 20120193423 | Samek | Aug 2012 | A1 |
| 20120203647 | Smith | Aug 2012 | A1 |
| 20120223141 | Good et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
| 20130043312 | Van Horn | Feb 2013 | A1 |
| 20130075168 | Amundsen et al. | Mar 2013 | A1 |
| 20130175341 | Kearney et al. | Jul 2013 | A1 |
| 20130175343 | Good | Jul 2013 | A1 |
| 20130257744 | Daghigh et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
| 20130257759 | Daghigh | Oct 2013 | A1 |
| 20130270346 | Xian et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
| 20130287258 | Kearney | Oct 2013 | A1 |
| 20130292475 | Kotlarsky et al. | Nov 2013 | A1 |
| 20130292477 | Hennick et al. | Nov 2013 | A1 |
| 20130293539 | Hunt et al. | Nov 2013 | A1 |
| 20130293540 | Laffargue et al. | Nov 2013 | A1 |
| 20130306728 | Thuries et al. | Nov 2013 | A1 |
| 20130306731 | Pedraro | Nov 2013 | A1 |
| 20130307964 | Bremer et al. | Nov 2013 | A1 |
| 20130308625 | Corcoran | Nov 2013 | A1 |
| 20130313324 | Koziol et al. | Nov 2013 | A1 |
| 20130313325 | Wilz et al. | Nov 2013 | A1 |
| 20130342717 | Havens et al. | Dec 2013 | A1 |
| 20140001267 | Giordano et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
| 20140002828 | Laffargue et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
| 20140008439 | Wang | Jan 2014 | A1 |
| 20140025584 | Liu et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
| 20140034734 | Sauerwein | Feb 2014 | A1 |
| 20140036848 | Pease et al. | Feb 2014 | A1 |
| 20140039693 | Havens et al. | Feb 2014 | A1 |
| 20140042814 | Kather et al. | Feb 2014 | A1 |
| 20140049120 | Kohtz et al. | Feb 2014 | A1 |
| 20140049635 | Laffargue et al. | Feb 2014 | A1 |
| 20140061306 | Wu et al. | Mar 2014 | A1 |
| 20140063289 | Hussey et al. | Mar 2014 | A1 |
| 20140066136 | Sauerwein et al. | Mar 2014 | A1 |
| 20140067692 | Ye et al. | Mar 2014 | A1 |
| 20140070005 | Nahill et al. | Mar 2014 | A1 |
| 20140071840 | Venancio | Mar 2014 | A1 |
| 20140074746 | Wang | Mar 2014 | A1 |
| 20140076974 | Havens et al. | Mar 2014 | A1 |
| 20140078341 | Havens et al. | Mar 2014 | A1 |
| 20140078342 | Li et al. | Mar 2014 | A1 |
| 20140078345 | Showering | Mar 2014 | A1 |
| 20140098792 | Wang et al. | Apr 2014 | A1 |
| 20140100774 | Showering | Apr 2014 | A1 |
| 20140100813 | Showering | Apr 2014 | A1 |
| 20140103115 | Meier et al. | Apr 2014 | A1 |
| 20140104413 | McCloskey et al. | Apr 2014 | A1 |
| 20140104414 | McCloskey et al. | Apr 2014 | A1 |
| 20140104416 | Li et al. | Apr 2014 | A1 |
| 20140104451 | Todeschini et al. | Apr 2014 | A1 |
| 20140106594 | Skvoretz | Apr 2014 | A1 |
| 20140106725 | Sauerwein | Apr 2014 | A1 |
| 20140108010 | Maltseff et al. | Apr 2014 | A1 |
| 20140108402 | Gomez et al. | Apr 2014 | A1 |
| 20140108682 | Caballero | Apr 2014 | A1 |
| 20140110485 | Toa et al. | Apr 2014 | A1 |
| 20140114530 | Fitch et al. | Apr 2014 | A1 |
| 20140121438 | Kearney | May 2014 | A1 |
| 20140121445 | Ding et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
| 20140124577 | Wang et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
| 20140124579 | Ding | May 2014 | A1 |
| 20140125842 | Winegar | May 2014 | A1 |
| 20140125853 | Wang | May 2014 | A1 |
| 20140125999 | Longacre et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
| 20140129378 | Richardson | May 2014 | A1 |
| 20140131441 | Nahill et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
| 20140131443 | Smith | May 2014 | A1 |
| 20140131444 | Wang | May 2014 | A1 |
| 20140131448 | Xian et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
| 20140133379 | Wang et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
| 20140136208 | Maltseff et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
| 20140140585 | Wang | May 2014 | A1 |
| 20140151453 | Meier et al. | Jun 2014 | A1 |
| 20140152882 | Samek et al. | Jun 2014 | A1 |
| 20140158770 | Sevier et al. | Jun 2014 | A1 |
| 20140159869 | Zumsteg et al. | Jun 2014 | A1 |
| 20140166755 | Liu et al. | Jun 2014 | A1 |
| 20140166757 | Smith | Jun 2014 | A1 |
| 20140166759 | Liu et al. | Jun 2014 | A1 |
| 20140168787 | Wang et al. | Jun 2014 | A1 |
| 20140175165 | Havens et al. | Jun 2014 | A1 |
| 20140175172 | Jovanovski et al. | Jun 2014 | A1 |
| 20140191644 | Chaney | Jul 2014 | A1 |
| 20140191913 | Ge et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
| 20140197238 | Lui et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
| 20140197239 | Havens et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
| 20140197304 | Feng et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
| 20140203087 | Smith et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
| 20140204268 | Grunow et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
| 20140214631 | Hansen | Jul 2014 | A1 |
| 20140217166 | Berthiaume et al. | Aug 2014 | A1 |
| 20140217180 | Liu | Aug 2014 | A1 |
| 20140231500 | Ehrhart et al. | Aug 2014 | A1 |
| 20140232930 | Anderson | Aug 2014 | A1 |
| 20140247315 | Marty et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
| 20140263493 | Amurgis et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
| 20140263645 | Smith et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
| 20140270196 | Braho et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
| 20140270229 | Braho | Sep 2014 | A1 |
| 20140278387 | DiGregorio | Sep 2014 | A1 |
| 20140282210 | Bianconi | Sep 2014 | A1 |
| 20140284384 | Lu et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
| 20140288933 | Braho et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
| 20140297058 | Barker et al. | Oct 2014 | A1 |
| 20140299665 | Barber et al. | Oct 2014 | A1 |
| 20140312121 | Lu et al. | Oct 2014 | A1 |
| 20140319220 | Coyle | Oct 2014 | A1 |
| 20140319221 | Oberpriller et al. | Oct 2014 | A1 |
| 20140326787 | Barten | Nov 2014 | A1 |
| 20140332590 | Wang et al. | Nov 2014 | A1 |
| 20140344943 | Todeschini et al. | Nov 2014 | A1 |
| 20140346233 | Liu et al. | Nov 2014 | A1 |
| 20140351317 | Smith et al. | Nov 2014 | A1 |
| 20140353373 | Van Horn et al. | Dec 2014 | A1 |
| 20140361073 | Qu et al. | Dec 2014 | A1 |
| 20140361082 | Xian et al. | Dec 2014 | A1 |
| 20140362184 | Jovanovski et al. | Dec 2014 | A1 |
| 20140363015 | Braho | Dec 2014 | A1 |
| 20140369511 | Sheerin et al. | Dec 2014 | A1 |
| 20140374483 | Lu | Dec 2014 | A1 |
| 20140374485 | Xian et al. | Dec 2014 | A1 |
| 20150001301 | Ouyang | Jan 2015 | A1 |
| 20150001304 | Todeschini | Jan 2015 | A1 |
| 20150003673 | Fletcher | Jan 2015 | A1 |
| 20150009338 | Laffargue et al. | Jan 2015 | A1 |
| 20150009610 | London et al. | Jan 2015 | A1 |
| 20150014416 | Kotlarsky et al. | Jan 2015 | A1 |
| 20150021397 | Rueblinger et al. | Jan 2015 | A1 |
| 20150028102 | Ren et al. | Jan 2015 | A1 |
| 20150028103 | Jiang | Jan 2015 | A1 |
| 20150028104 | Ma et al. | Jan 2015 | A1 |
| 20150029002 | Yeakley et al. | Jan 2015 | A1 |
| 20150032709 | Maloy et al. | Jan 2015 | A1 |
| 20150039309 | Braho et al. | Feb 2015 | A1 |
| 20150040378 | Saber et al. | Feb 2015 | A1 |
| 20150048168 | Fritz et al. | Feb 2015 | A1 |
| 20150049347 | Laffargue et al. | Feb 2015 | A1 |
| 20150051992 | Smith | Feb 2015 | A1 |
| 20150053766 | Havens et al. | Feb 2015 | A1 |
| 20150053768 | Wang et al. | Feb 2015 | A1 |
| 20150053769 | Thuries et al. | Feb 2015 | A1 |
| 20150062366 | Liu et al. | Mar 2015 | A1 |
| 20150063215 | Wang | Mar 2015 | A1 |
| 20150063676 | Lloyd et al. | Mar 2015 | A1 |
| 20150069130 | Gannon | Mar 2015 | A1 |
| 20150071818 | Todeschini | Mar 2015 | A1 |
| 20150083800 | Li et al. | Mar 2015 | A1 |
| 20150086114 | Todeschini | Mar 2015 | A1 |
| 20150088522 | Hendrickson et al. | Mar 2015 | A1 |
| 20150096872 | Woodburn | Apr 2015 | A1 |
| 20150099557 | Pettinelli et al. | Apr 2015 | A1 |
| 20150100196 | Hollifield | Apr 2015 | A1 |
| 20150102109 | Huck | Apr 2015 | A1 |
| 20150115035 | Meier et al. | Apr 2015 | A1 |
| 20150127791 | Kosecki et al. | May 2015 | A1 |
| 20150128116 | Chen et al. | May 2015 | A1 |
| 20150129659 | Feng et al. | May 2015 | A1 |
| 20150133047 | Smith et al. | May 2015 | A1 |
| 20150134470 | Hejl et al. | May 2015 | A1 |
| 20150136851 | Harding et al. | May 2015 | A1 |
| 20150136854 | Lu et al. | May 2015 | A1 |
| 20150142492 | Kumar | May 2015 | A1 |
| 20150144692 | Hejl | May 2015 | A1 |
| 20150144698 | Teng et al. | May 2015 | A1 |
| 20150144701 | Xian et al. | May 2015 | A1 |
| 20150149946 | Benos et al. | May 2015 | A1 |
| 20150161429 | Xian | Jun 2015 | A1 |
| 20150169925 | Chang et al. | Jun 2015 | A1 |
| 20150169929 | Williams et al. | Jun 2015 | A1 |
| 20150186703 | Chen et al. | Jul 2015 | A1 |
| 20150193644 | Kearney et al. | Jul 2015 | A1 |
| 20150193645 | Colavito et al. | Jul 2015 | A1 |
| 20150199957 | Funyak et al. | Jul 2015 | A1 |
| 20150204671 | Showering | Jul 2015 | A1 |
| Number | Date | Country |
|---|---|---|
| 2013163789 | Nov 2013 | WO |
| 2013173985 | Nov 2013 | WO |
| 2014019130 | Feb 2014 | WO |
| 2014110495 | Jul 2014 | WO |
| Entry |
|---|
| Office Action in counterpart UK Application No. GB1607592.1 dated Nov. 1, 2016, pp. 1-6. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 13/367,978, filed Feb. 7, 2012, (Feng et al.); now abandoned. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 14/462,801 for Mobile Computing Device With Data Cognition Software, filed Aug. 19, 2014 (Todeschini et al.); 38 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 14/596,757 for System and Method for Detecting Barcode Printing Errors filed Jan. 14, 2015 (Ackley); 41 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 14/277,337 for Multipurpose Optical Reader, filed May 14, 2014 (Jovanovski et al.); 59 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 14/200,405 for Indicia Reader for Size-Limited Applications filed Mar. 7, 2014 (Feng et al.); 42 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 14/662,922 for Multifunction Point of Sale System filed Mar. 19, 2015 (Van Horn et al.); 41 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 14/446,391 for Multifunction Point of Sale Apparatus With Optical Signature Capture filed Jul. 30, 2014 (Good et al.); 37 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 29/528,165 for In-Counter Barcode Scanner filed May 27, 2015 (Oberpriller et al.); 13 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 29/528,890 for Mobile Computer Housing filed Jun. 2, 2015 (Fitch et al.); 61 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 14/614,796 for Cargo Apportionment Techniques filed Feb. 5, 2015 (Morton et al.); 56 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 29/516,892 for Table Computer filed Feb. 6, 2015 (Bidwell et al.); 13 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 29/523,098 for Handle for a Tablet Computer filed Apr. 7, 2015 (Bidwell et al.); 17 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 14/578,627 for Safety System and Method filed Dec. 22, 2014 (Ackley et al.); 32 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 14/573,022 for Dynamic Diagnostic Indicator Generation filed Dec. 17, 2014 (Goldsmith); 43 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 14/529,857 for Barcode Reader With Security Features filed Oct. 31, 2014 (Todeschini et al.); 32 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 14/519,195 for Handheld Dimensioning System With Feedback filed Oct. 21, 2014 (Laffargue et al.); 39 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 14/519,211 for System and Method for Dimensioning filed Oct. 21, 2014 (Ackley et al.); 33 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 14/519,233 for Handheld Dimensioner With Data-Quality Indication filed Oct. 21, 2014 (Laffargue et al.); 36 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 14/533,319 for Barcode Scanning System Using Wearable Device With Embedded Camera filed Nov. 5, 2014 (Todeschini); 29 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 14/748,446 for Cordless Indicia Reader With a Multifunction Coil for Wireless Charging and EAS Deactivation, filed Jun. 24, 2015 (Xie et al.); 34 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 29/528,590 for Electronic Device filed May 29, 2015 (Fitch et al.); 9 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 14/519,249 for Handheld Dimensioning System With Measurement-Conformance Feedback filed Oct. 21, 2014 (Ackley et al.); 36 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 29/519,017 for Scanner filed Mar. 2, 2015 (Zhou et al.); 11 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 14/398,542 for Portable Electronic Devices Having a Separate Location Trigger Unit for use in Controlling an Application Unit filed Nov. 3, 2014 (Bian et al.); 22 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 14/405,278 for Design Pattern for Secure Store filed Mar. 9, 2015 (Zhu et al.); 23 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 14/590,024 for Shelving and Package Locating Systems for Delivery Vehicles filed Jan. 6, 2015 (Payne); 31 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 14/568,305 for Auto-Contrast Viewfinder for an Indicia Reader filed Dec. 12, 2014 (Todeschini); 29 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 29/526,918 for Charging Base filed May 14, 2015 (Fitch et al.); 10 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 14/580,262 for Media Gate for Thermal Transfer Printers filed Dec. 23, 2014 (Bowles); 36 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 14/519,179 for Dimensioning System With Multipath Interference Mitigation filed Oct. 21, 2014 (Thuries et al.); 30 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 14/264,173 for Autofocus Lens System for Indicia Readers filed Apr. 29, 2014, (Ackley et al.); 39 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 14/453,019 for Dimensioning System With Guided Alignment, filed Aug. 6, 2014 (Li et al.); 31 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 14/452,697 for Interactive Indicia Reader , filed Aug. 6, 2014, (Todeschini); 32 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 14/231,898 for Hand-Mounted Indicia-Reading Device with Finger Motion Triggering filed Apr. 1, 2014 (Van Horn et al.); 36 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 14/715,916 for Evaluating Image Values filed May 19, 2015 (Ackley); 60 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 14/513,808 for Identifying Inventory Items in a Storage Facility filed Oct. 14, 2014 (Single et al.); 51 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 29/458,405 for an Electronic Device, filed Jun. 19, 2013 (Fitch et al.); 22 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 29/459,620 for an Electronic Device Enclosure, filed Jul. 2, 2013 (London et al.); 21 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 14/483,056 for Variable Depth of Field Barcode Scanner filed Sep. 10, (McCloskey 2014 et al.); 29 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 14/531,154 for Directing an Inspector Through an Inspection filed Nov. 3, 2014 (Miller et al.); 53 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 29/525,068 for Tablet Computer With Removable Scanning Device filed Apr. 27, 2015 (Schulte et al.); 19 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 29/468,118 for an Electronic Device Case, filed Sep. 26, 2013 (Oberpriller et al.); 44 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 14/340,627 for an Axially Reinforced Flexible Scan Element, filed Jul. 25, 2014 (Reublinger et al.); 41 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 14/676,327 for Device Management Proxy for Secure Devices filed Apr. 1, 2015 (Yeakley et al.); 50 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 14/257,364 for Docking System and Method Using Near Field Communication filed Apr. 21, 2014 (Showering); 31 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 14/327,827 for Mobile-Phone Adapter for Electronic Transactions, filed Jul. 10, 2014 (Hejl); 25 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 14/334,934 for a System and Method for Indicia Verification, filed Jul. 18, 2014 (Hejl); 38 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 29/530,600 for Cyclone filed Jun. 18, 2015 (Vargo et al); 16 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 14/707,123 for Application Independent DEX/UCS Interface filed May 8, 2015 (Pape); 47 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 14/283,282 for 21, 2014 Terminal Having Illumination and Focus Control filed May 21, 2014 (liu et al.); 31 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 14/619,093 for Methods for Training a Speech Recognition System filed Feb. 11, 2015 (Pecorari); 35 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 29/524,186 for Scanner filed Apr. 17, 2015 (Zhou et al.); 17 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 14/705,407 for Method and System to Protect Software-Based Network-Connected Devices From Advanced Persistent Threat filed May 6, 2015 (Hussey et al.); 42 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 14/614,706 for Device for Supporting an Electronic Tool on a User's Hand filed Feb. 5, 2015 (Oberpiller et al.); 33 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 14/628,708 for Device, System, and Method for Determining the Status of Checkout Lanes filed Feb. 23, 2015 (Todeschini); 37 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 14/704,050 for Intermediate Linear Positioning filed May 5, 2015 (Charpentier et al.); 60 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 14/529,563 for Adaptable Interface for a Mobile Computing Device filed Oct. 31, 2014 (Schoon et al.); 36 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 14/705,012 for Hands-Free Human Machine Interface Responsive to a Driver of a Vehicle filed May 6, 2015 (Fitch et al.); 44 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 14/715,672 for Augumented Reality Enabled Hazard Display filed May 19, 2015 (Venkatesha et al.); 35 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 14/695,364 for Medication Management System filed Apr. 24, 2015 (Sewell et al.); 44 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 14/664,063 for Method and Application for Scanning a Barcode With a Smart Device While Continuously Running and Displaying an Application on the Smart Device Display filed Mar. 20, 2015 (Todeschini); 37 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 14/735,717 for Indicia-Reading Systems Having an Interface With a User's Nervous System filed Jun. 10, 2015 (Todeschini); 39 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 14/527,191 for Method and System for Recognizing Speech Using Wildcards in an Expected Response filed Oct. 29, 2014 (Braho et al.); 45 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 14/702,110 for System and Method for Regulating Barcode Data Injection Into a Running Application on a Smart Device filed May 1, 2015 (Todeschini et al.); 38 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 14/535,764 for Concatenated Expected Responses for Speech Recogintion filed 2014 (Braho et al.); 51 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 14/687,289 for System for Communication Via a Peripheral Hub filed Apr. 15, 2015 (Kohtz et al.); 37 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 14/747,197 for Optical Pattern Projector filed Jun. 23, 2015 (Thuries et al.); 33 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 14/674,329 for Aimer for Barcode Scanning filed Mar. 31, 2015 (Bidwell); 36 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 14/702,979 for Tracking Battery Conditions filed May 4, 2015 (Young et al.); 70 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 29/529,441 for Indicia Reading Device filed Jun. 8, 2015 (Zhou et al.); 14 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 14/747,490 for Dual-Projector Three-Dimensional Scanner filed Jun. 23, 2015 (Jovanovski et al.); 40 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 14/740,320 for Tactile Switch for a Mobile Electronic Device filed Jun. 16, 2015 (Barndringa); 38 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 14/695,923 for Secure Unattended Network Authentication filed Apr. 24, 2015 (Kubler et al.); 52 pages. |
| U.S. Patent Application No. 14/740,373 for Calibrating a Volume Dimensioner filed Jun. 16, 2015 (Ackley et al.); 63 pages. |
| Office Action in counterpart UK Application No. GB1607592.1 dated Sep. 28, 2017, pp. 1-3. |
| Combined Search and Examination Report in UK Application No. GB1707795.9; dated Dec. 11, 2017, pp. 1-6. |
| Examination Report in counterpart UK Application No. GB1607592.1 dated Dec. 11, 2017, pp. 1-5. |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20160327930 A1 | Nov 2016 | US |
