n/a
n/a
The present invention relates to a method for detecting short circuits between ablation electrodes during a radiofrequency ablation procedure.
Current radiofrequency ablation (“RF”) devices are constructed in a variety of configurations to target specific maladies and to provide for specific treatment protocols. In particular, many RF ablation devices have one or more treatment regions in which multiple treatment electrodes are disposed and are torqueable, or otherwise manipulatable, into a variety of different geometric configurations to treat particular cardiovascular tissues. For example, treatment electrodes may be coupled to an array or a carrier assembly manipulatable to define substantially linear, helical, and circular configurations depending on the desired treatment to be performed. In such configurations, each adjacent electrode may be spaced a distance away, whether longitudinal or radial, such that that bipolar or unipolar radiofrequency energy may be transmitted between the electrodes to treat the tissue.
Because the treatment electrodes may be manipulated into a variety of different positions, adjacent electrodes may be unintentionally positioned too close to one another such that a short circuit may occur. For example, when the electrode array is torqued to define a substantially circular configuration, when a distal electrode in the array is torqued and manipulated toward a proximal electrode in the array to define a circle, depending on the skill of the surgeon, the array may be over-manipulated such that two or more electrodes may intermittently touch each other, or be positioned sufficiently close such that the flow of current between the electrodes shorts, resulting in treatment safety concerns.
Current methods of detecting short circuits in electrosurgical devices involve measuring impedance between the electrodes with a tissue to be treated sandwiched between them like a clamp, and measuring when the impedance rises above a predetermined value. When the impedance threshold is reached, the entire electrosurgical device is deactivated. However, such methods result in an all or nothing response to a short circuit and do not allow for deactivation of the particular shorted electrodes while keeping activated non-shorted electrodes. Further, because many different energy modes may be utilized during an RF ablation treatment, a single static impedance threshold value may be inaccurate for certain energy modes. Other methods include measuring the temperature at the electrodes and detecting a short between electrodes if the temperature of one of the electrodes exceeds a temperature threshold when the power is less than predetermined valve. This existing short circuit algorithm may detect excessive temperatures on the electrode during a short circuit, but does not always detect a short circuit when electrodes are close together since high temperatures normally occur between the electrodes.
Accordingly, what is needed is a method of a short-circuit detection that facilitates the on-off operation of individual electrodes in an electrode array that is specific to a particular energy delivery mode.
The present invention advantageously provides a method and system for detecting a short circuit during a radiofrequency ablation procedure. The method includes measuring an impedance of a pair of electrodes coupled to a treatment assembly of a medical device. Radiofrequency ablation energy is transmitted between the pair of electrodes. The transmission of radiofrequency ablation energy between the pair of electrodes is terminated when after a predetermined period of time the measured impedance in either of the electrodes in the pair of electrodes is below a predetermined threshold impedance value. An alert is generated indicating a short circuit between the pair of electrodes.
In another embodiment, the system includes a medical device having a treatment assembly, the treatment assembly having a plurality of electrode pairs, the treatment assembly being manipulatable to define a substantially circular geometric configuration. A control unit is included, the control unit is operable to: measure an impedance of a first pair of the plurality of electrode pairs; transmit radiofrequency ablation energy between the plurality of electrode pairs; terminate the transmission of radiofrequency ablation energy between the first pair of the plurality of electrode pairs when after a predetermined period of time the measured impedance in either of the electrodes in the first pair of the plurality of electrode pairs is below a predetermined threshold impedance value; and generate and alert indicating a short circuit between the pair of electrodes.
In yet another embodiment, the method includes positioning an electrode array of a medical device proximate a tissue to be treated, the electrode array defining a proximal end and distal end and having a plurality of electrode pairs spanning from the proximal end to the distal end. The electrode array is manipulated to define a substantially circular geometric configuration. An impedance of a first pair of the plurality of electrode pairs is measured, the first pair of the plurality of electrode pairs including the most proximal electrode in the electrode array and the most distal electrode in the electrode array. Radiofrequency ablation energy is transmitted between the plurality of electrode pairs. The transmission of radiofrequency ablation energy between the first pair of the plurality of electrode pairs is terminated when after a predetermined period of time the measured impedance in either of the electrodes in the first pair of the plurality of electrode pairs is below a predetermined threshold impedance value. An alert is generated indicating a short circuit between the first pair of the plurality of electrode pairs.
A more complete understanding of the present invention, and the attendant advantages and features thereof, will be more readily understood by reference to the following detailed description when considered in conjunction with the accompanying drawings wherein:
Referring now to the drawings in which like reference designators refer to like elements, there is shown in
The control unit 10 may generally include a display or monitor, operating controls, and couplings for connection to one or more medical devices, one or more patient return or “indifferent” electrodes, an ECG, a power cable, and/or other operating equipment. The control unit 10 may have electronic circuitry to produce the desired ablation energy, to deliver it to the ablation elements of a medical device, to obtain feedback information or parameters from other sensors, and to operate, adjust, modulate or cease providing the ablation energy during a medical treatment of a patient, as well as to display or otherwise inform the physician.
Generally, the control unit 10 may be operated in various modes which may be selected by the physician. For example, ablation energy may be supplied to one or more ablation elements, for example electrodes, in a bipolar mode, a unipolar mode, or a combination bipolar and unipolar mode. A unipolar mode of operation involves delivering energy between one or more ablation elements on a medical device and one or more patient return or reference electrodes touching the skin of the patient or positioned beneath the patient, such as a back plate. A bipolar mode of operation involves delivering energy between at least two electrodes on a medical device. A combination mode of operation involves delivering energy in both bipolar and unipolar modes simultaneously and/or intermittently. When in a combination mode of operation, it may be possible to select various ratios of activity or ablation energy among the bipolar and unipolar modes, including for example ratios such as 1:1, 2:1, or 4:1 (bipolar:unipolar). For example, an energy mode ratio of 4:1 means that four times more bipolar energy is transmitted between a pair of electrodes compared to unipolar energy transmitted.
The medical devices coupled to the control unit 10 may be catheters or surgical probes, including for example an electrophysiology catheter having diagnostic and/or treatment components positionable at or near a target tissue region. For example, the medical device 12 illustrated in
Now referring to
Continuing to refer to
Radiofrequency ablation energy may be transmitted between two or more of the electrodes 46 on the array 44 and/or between the electrodes 46 and a reference electrode for a predetermined period of time (S106). For example, radiofrequency ablation energy may be transmitted between electrodes 1 and 10, and/or 2 and 9, and so on, in unipolar, 1:1, 2:1, 4:1, and/or bipolar energy modes. The impedance in Step S104 may be measured before, during, and/or after radiofrequency ablation energy is transmitted between the electrodes 46. After a predetermined period of ablation time, referred to herein as the ramp-up time, the measured impedance may be compared against a threshold or relative impedance value to determine if there is a short circuit between two electrodes (S108). In particular, to determine the ramp-up time, an analysis of the ramp-up time on over 4000 ablations was completed. As the temperature reaches a preprogrammed temperature set point, or the power reaches the maximum, the derivative of the power slows down and eventually crosses zero as seen in the plot in
The same roughly 4000 clinical ablations discussed above were further analyzed to determine threshold impedance values to determine if an intermittent short circuit has occurred between two or more electrodes 46 on the array 44 when manipulated into a substantially circular configuration. Owing to the different ratios of bipolar and unipolar energy that may be transmitted between the electrodes 46 and/or to a reference electrode, the more bipolar component of the energy mode, the lower the threshold impedance values. For example, an absolute threshold value was selected rather than a proportion of the starting impedance because the measured impedance from when ablation energy is initially transmitted may be too low, so detecting a drop in impedance may not accurately detect short circuits. The minimum impedance after 10 seconds of ablation time was calculated for each of the energy modes. The probability plots shown in
Now referring to
If the measured impedance at any one of the electrodes 46 drops below the impedance threshold value or the relative impedance value for the particular energy mode, the flow of radiofrequency energy to the particular electrode 46 and/or electrode pair, for example, electrodes 1 and 10, may be selectively terminated (S110), while the other electrodes 46 in the array 44 may continue to transmit radiofrequency energy. Alternatively, in response to an intermittent short circuit with any of the electrodes 46, radiofrequency ablation energy may be terminated to the entire electrode array 44. If the measured impedance is above the threshold for the particular energy mode, then radiofrequency ablation energy may continue to be transmitted to the target tissue. An alert may be generated indicating a short circuit between the pair of shorted electrodes (Step 112). For example, the control unit 10 may display or otherwise alert the operator which electrodes are shorted and when the transmitting of radiofrequency energy between the shorted electrodes was terminated. Optionally, the measured impedance may also be compared against average measured impedances for a particular procedure and for a particular tissue. For example, in certain procedures and tissues, the starting measured impedance may be lower or higher depending on the thickness of the tissue to be ablated. Thus, in addition to comparing the measured impedance of a particular electrode to the predetermined threshold, the measured impedance may be compared to an average impedance for that particular tissue to further determine if a short circuit has occurred between two electrodes. For example, if the measured impedance drops below a predetermined percentage, for example, 80% below the mean measured impedance over time, which may be a dynamic mean, then a short circuit may have occurred between two electrodes.
The control unit 10 may be programmed to perform the various operations and calculate the measured impedances as discussed above. Specifically, the control unit 10 may automatically terminate to the flow of radiofrequency energy to the electrodes 46 or electrode pairs with measured impedance values below the predetermined threshold. Alternatively, the control unit 10 may display a visual warning or emit and audio warning when the measured impedance drops below the threshold such that the operator of the control unit 10 may manually terminate the flow of radiofrequency energy to the affected electrodes 46. Although the method and system described above is described with respect to a distal treatment assembly being configured to define a substantially circular geometric configuration, it is contemplated that the method and system described herein may be used with any configuration of electrodes and distal assemblies in which a short circuit may occur.
It will be appreciated by persons skilled in the art that the present invention is not limited to what has been particularly shown and described herein above. In addition, unless mention was made above to the contrary, it should be noted that all of the accompanying drawings are not to scale. A variety of modifications and variations are possible in light of the above teachings without departing from the scope and spirit of the invention, which is limited only by the following claims.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5514129 | Smith | May 1996 | A |
5681308 | Edwards et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
5769846 | Edwards et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5897577 | Cinbis et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
6050267 | Nardella et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6132426 | Kroll | Oct 2000 | A |
6203541 | Keppel | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6217574 | Webster | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6256540 | Panescu et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6391024 | Sun et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6546270 | Goldin et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6730079 | Lovewell | May 2004 | B2 |
7736357 | Lee, Jr. et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
8398626 | Buysse et al. | Mar 2013 | B2 |
20020032439 | Hareyama | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20040064161 | Gunderson et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20050222562 | Lovewell | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050283074 | Jackson et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20070062547 | Pappone | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070173808 | Goble | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20080281312 | Werneth et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080281314 | Johnson et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20090030664 | Bridges et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090240244 | Malis et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090275827 | Aiken et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20100049188 | Nelson et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100168557 | Deno et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100168571 | Savery et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100179538 | Podhajsky | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100274238 | Klimovitch | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20110046618 | Minar et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110130755 | Bhushan et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110144524 | Fish et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110152712 | Cao et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110230876 | Hong et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110270243 | Skarda et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20120265194 | Podhajsky | Oct 2012 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1151725 | Nov 2001 | EP |
1429678 | Mar 2006 | EP |
1803410 | Jul 2007 | EP |
1867279 | Dec 2007 | EP |
1280467 | Nov 2008 | EP |
2004011090 | Feb 2004 | WO |
2011103129 | Aug 2011 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20130289551 A1 | Oct 2013 | US |