Not Applicable.
Not Applicable
Not Applicable
1. Field of the Invention
This invention relates to the field of internal combustion engines. More particularly, the present invention comprises an internal combustion engine having a sliding guillotine valve.
2. Description of the Related Art
Most modern internal combustion engines operating on the Otto cycle (or close derivatives such as the Miller cycle) utilize intake and exhaust valves (1) to allow air to fill the combustion chamber during the intake stroke, (2) to trap air in the combustion chamber during the compression stroke and power stroke, and (3) to evacuate the products of combustion from the combustion chamber during the exhaust stroke. The timing, lift, and duration of valve opening is most commonly controlled by the rotation of a camshaft. The camshaft is mechanically linked to the output shaft of the engine such that each valve operates in synchronization with the engine's combustion cycle.
In order to change the timing or duration of valve opening, one must replace the existing camshaft with a camshaft having a different cam geometry (or utilize complex mechanisms to vary the distance between the camshaft center and the valve stems). Because engines are generally equipped with camshafts having nearly optimal cam geometries, this is not much of a concern in conventional vehicle applications. When one wishes to employ a more aggressive tuning (such as in racing applications) or when one wants to improve fuel economy, having the ability to vary the timing, lift, or duration of valve opening is desirable.
Optimal timing, lift, and duration are functions of engine speed and load. Thus, in order to operate at optimal volumetric efficiency, it is necessary to vary timing, lift, and duration throughout an engine's powerband. It has become increasingly common to utilize multiple intake or exhaust valves on a single combustion chamber or to utilize multiple camshafts or cams to control a single valve. These systems improve volumetric efficiency, but do so at the expense of additional weight, cost, and complexity. Thus, it would be desirable to provide an intake and exhaust valve design which is highly variable such that different timing, lift, and duration may be employed throughout the engine's powerband.
The present invention is an internal combustion engine employing a guillotine sliding valve regulating the passage of a fluid between the hollow interior of the combustion chamber and the atmosphere. The valve includes a valve body having a valve opening and a blade track passing around the valve opening. A guillotine blade slides linearly along the blade track between an open position in which said fluid may pass through the valve opening and a closed position in which the fluid is restricted from passing through the valve opening. A reciprocating driver moves the guillotine blade along the blade track when actuated by an electronic control signal.
The present invention can be applied to virtually any type of internal combustion engine. Those skilled in the art will know that most such engines employ 4 or more cylinders. However, in order to convey the principles of the present invention in an uncluttered manner, a single cylinder engine is illustrated. Many conventional components of such an engine have likewise not been illustrated.
Other forms of energy could also be used to actuate the reciprocating driver. As a second example, a hydraulic cylinder could be used to propel connector 20 in one or more directions. The hydraulic cylinder would be one part of a hydraulic circuit which would selectively connect reciprocating driver 18 to a high pressure hydraulic line. The selective connection could be made using a solenoid to open and close a valve. Thus, this second type of system can also be easily controlled by the ECU.
Returning to the example of
Valve body 34 is attached to the exhaust port of combustion chamber 14. Valve body 34 controls the exhaust flow from combustion chamber 14 to the exhaust header of the engine. During the intake stroke, no voltage is applied to reciprocating driver 28. As such, connector 30 and blade 38 remain in the fully extended position within valve body 34. Blade 38 thus blocks valve port 36 preventing exhaust gases from leaking back into combustion chamber 14 as the piston exerts a vacuum in combustion chamber 14 during the intake stroke.
Turning to
As shown more clearly in
Although
With the general operating principles now described, the advantages offered by such a configuration may now be considered in greater detail. As mentioned previously, such a valve configuration is advantageous for optimizing performance and/or fuel economy. This is because the valve configuration of the present invention allows for nearly infinite control and variation of valve timing, lift and duration.
Most modern vehicles utilize fuel and ignition “maps” which are stored in the memory of the vehicle's engine control unit to control the amount of fuel injected into each combustion chamber as well as the timing of the ignition spark. These quantity and timing values are typically a function of engine speed (in revolutions per minute) and load (commonly based on throttle position, intake air flow rates measured by a mass air flow sensor, or both). The vehicle's engine control unit reads the engine speed and load and then looks up the quantity of fuel to inject (usually expressed in terms of fuel injector activation time) and the timing of spark (usually correlating to the position of the piston relative to top dead center during the compression or power stroke). These fuel maps can typically be modified or “tuned” for improved performance or fuel economy.
In much the same way that an engine control unit is able to read maps and control fuel and spark, it is contemplated that powertrain control module 10 may be configured to read maps and control valve timing, lift, and duration. As mentioned previously, valve timing, lift and duration have historically been modified by changing parts of the engine's valvetrain (for example, changing the camshaft, valves, valve springs, retainers, rocker arms, and shafts). Such is not required for the present invention. The “valvetrain” of the present invention may be easily modified by changing the maps powertrain control module 10 uses for controlling timing, lift, and duration. It should be noted that the term “lift” as used in the context of the present invention does not refer to the degree of separation of the poppet valve from the valve seat. Instead, “lift” refers to the analogous degree of opening of the guillotine sliding valve of the present invention. In the context of the present invention, “lift” may be controlled by the voltage value applied to reciprocating drivers 18 and 28. Higher voltages result in more lift (assuming a normally closed valve is used) or vice versa (assuming a normally open valve is used. Timing and duration are also controlled electronically based on the actual time and length of time voltage is applied to reciprocating drivers 18 and 28 relative to the combustion cycle.
As with fuel and spark maps, the proposed valve maps may also be engine speed and load dependant. As such, when the engine control unit reads the engine speed and load data, the same values may be used by powertrain control module 10 to look up the programmed values for valve timing, lift, and duration. It is further contemplated that various selectable map packs may be provided for the user so that the user may select a desired map for a particular application. For example, the user may select a map that is optimized for fuel economy before driving a long trip. Alternatively, the user may select a map pack that is optimized for performance before driving on a track.
The use of the guillotine valve also makes it possible to selectively open additional intake and exhaust valves. Those skilled in the art will know that engines achieve higher power outputs by using multiple intake and exhaust valves per cylinder (such as a pair of intake valves and a pair of exhaust valves). However, the use of both valve pair is relatively inefficient at low engine speeds. Thus, there are advantages to being able to selectively turn on and off one or more valves in a set. The guillotine valve allows this functionality.
There are many other advantages that may be realized with the guillotine sliding valve valvetrain of the present invention. Because the present invention can accomplish infinite valve timing, lift and duration by simple electronic control, there is no need for traditional valvetrain components (including camshafts and rocker arms). The removal of these components reduces engine weight, complexity, and cost. The control variability afforded by the present invention not only allows for optimized valve tuning based on load and engine speed, but also enables optimized valve tuning based on the fuel source. This feature may become more valuable as refueling stations continue to offer different ethanol and gasoline blends.
The reader should appreciate that the drawings show a relatively simplified embodiment of the invention. Many conventionally understood components—such as encapsulating housings with associated oil feedings and drainage ports—have not been illustrated. The present invention would preferably include such components.
The preceding description contains significant detail regarding the novel aspects of the present invention. It should not be construed, however, as limiting the scope of the invention but rather as providing illustrations of the preferred embodiments of the invention. Such variations would not alter the function of the invention. Thus, the scope of the invention should be fixed by the following claims, rather than by the examples given.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2028138 | Coulling | Jan 1936 | A |
2113519 | Sloat | Apr 1938 | A |
2686507 | Lombardi | Aug 1954 | A |
2874686 | Carey, Jr. | Feb 1959 | A |
4765287 | Taylor et al. | Aug 1988 | A |
4875440 | Kaptur | Oct 1989 | A |
5542385 | Kim | Aug 1996 | A |
5596966 | Elder | Jan 1997 | A |
5694890 | Yazdi | Dec 1997 | A |
6917874 | Uchida et al. | Jul 2005 | B2 |
7137367 | Tanei | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7263963 | Price | Sep 2007 | B2 |
7309057 | Santiago | Dec 2007 | B2 |
20050092952 | McCarroll et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20090272357 | Yaoita | Nov 2009 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20100006054 A1 | Jan 2010 | US |