Internal combustion engine piston

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 6189500
  • Patent Number
    6,189,500
  • Date Filed
    Wednesday, August 11, 1999
    24 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, February 20, 2001
    23 years ago
Abstract
Piston for an internal combustion engine has a top ring land with a diameter differential of at least 0.3% of the major diameter to eliminate the risk of cylinder polishing.
Description




BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION




The present invention relates to a piston for an internal combustion engine comprising an essentially cylindrical body with a plurality of axially spaced ring grooves in its lateral surface spaced from an end surface, a first portion of the cylindrical body, lying between the end surface and the most closely adjacent ring groove, having varying cross section.




DESCRIPTION OF THE RELATED ART




It is a known fact that pistons for internal combustion engines change their shape during engine operation under the influence of heat in the combustion chamber and the occurrence of dynamic forces.




The shape of the piston in its cold state must therefore be adapted to these changes in shape so that there is maintained between the piston and the cylinder wall, a clearance which is neither so small as to risk polishing of the cylinders when coke is deposited on the piston, nor so large that emissions and performance are negatively affected. Cylinder polishing results in increased oil consumption and can result in shearing.




The shape of the piston must also be adapted to those changes in shape which occur in the engine block itself as it is heated, which results in the outer cylinders in a multicylinder engine becoming inclined relative to the center cylinders. In other words, the cylinders will assume a “fan” shape as the engine block is heated and expands more at the top than at the bottom during engine operation.




In order to adapt the shape of the piston to this changing shape in the engine block, it is common to make the piston with an oval cross section with the minor diameter oriented in the longitudinal direction of the engine. The difference between the major and minor diameters of this piston portion is, in previously known engine designs, not larger than about 0.15 mm, which means a “normal” so-called top ring land clearance in the transverse direction of the engine of 0.40 mm and in the longitudinal direction of 0.55 mm when the engine is cold. In a known engine with a 131 mm cylinder diameter, this means a difference between the major and minor diameters which is about 0.1% of the major diameter. This clearance has, however, in certain engine designs not proved to be sufficient to eliminate the risk of polishing of the cylinders. It is a known fact that a small top ring land clearance can increase the risk of polishing the cylinder. This can be avoided by providing the piston with a large top ring land clearance. The clearance in this case has amounted to about 2 mm, which has, however, led to a large detrimental volume having a negative effect on emissions and performance.




SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION




The purpose of the present invention is to achieve a piston of the type described by way of introduction, by which it is possible to avoid cylinder polishing without making the detrimental volume so large that emissions and performance are affected more than marginally.




This is achieved according to the invention by virtue of the invention that the difference between the major and minor diameters of the cross section of the top ring land of the piston is at least 0.3% of the major diameter.




The invention is based on the idea of first investigating where cylinder polishing occurs and having a top ring land ovality which provides as little clearance as possible where no polishing occurs and increases the clearance only so much in the polished cylinder portions that polishing is avoided. Tests performed have shown that for a given engine design, polishing could not be avoided with common top ring land ovality on the order of 0.15 mm, i.e. about 0.1%, while it was only possible to eliminate polishing from 0.3%.











BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWING




The invention will be described in more detail below with reference to examples shown in the accompanying drawing, where

FIG. 1

shows a schematic longitudinal section through a cylinder lining with a portion of a piston therein in accordance with the invention, and

FIG. 2

shows the piston in

FIG. 1

seen from above and with its ovality greatly exaggerated.











In

FIG. 1

,


1


designates a cylinder lining in a multicylinder internal combustion engine of diesel type and


2


designates the upper portion of a piston, the lower portion (not shown) of which can be made in one piece with the upper portion


2


or be a separate portion joined with the latter, i.e. a pendulum piston. The upper portion


2


of the piston is made with first, second and third ring grooves


3


,


4


and


5


, respectively, for piston rings (not shown).




The so-called top ring land of the piston, i.e. the piston portion


6


between the upper surface


7


and the upper piston edge


8


of the first piston ring groove


3


is, firstly, slightly conical, as shown greatly exaggerated in

FIG. 1

, and is, secondly, oval as is shown greatly exaggerated in FIG.


2


. D


1


marks the diameter of the basic circle, i.e. the largest diameter of the oval piston portion


6


, while D


2


marks the smallest diameter of this portion


6


.




Tests performed have shown that the difference between D


1


and D


2


must be at least 0.3% of D


1


over a certain portion of the height h of the top ring land


6


of the piston and that the greatest difference should not exceed 3%. In tests performed on an engine with an inner diameter of 131 mm of the cylinder lining and a piston with an ovality of the piston top ring land which was 0.99 mm, the greatest clearance between the piston and the cylinder lining for a cold engine was 9.5 mm in the longitudinal direction of the engine and 0.51 mm in the transverse direction of the engine. It was found that previous problems with the same engine as regards cylinder polishing when the top ring land ovality was 0.15 mm could be completely eliminated without affecting performance and emissions more than marginally, when the ovality was increased to 0.99 mm, was having a diameter difference of about 0.8% instead of about 0.1%.




In

FIG. 2

, the shaded areas mark the deviation of the top ring land oval from a perfect circle. The sections A within the angular sectors α have a small top ring land clearance with a major diameter D


1


, while the sectors B within the angular sectors β have a varying diameter with a minimum diameter D


2


at the center of the sector, so that a soft transition is obtained between the sectors B with large clearance and the sectors A with small clearance to the cylinder lining. The sector angle α can vary from a minimum of 15° to a maximum of 120° depending on the engine. The positions of the sectors are determined by those locations in which testing has shown that there is a risk of polishing. It is most common, however, that polishing occurs in the longitudinal direction of the engine and that D


2


is thus parallel to the longitudinal direction.



Claims
  • 1. Piston for an internal combustion engine comprising:an essentially cylindrical body (2) with a plurality of axially spaced ring grooves (3,4,5) in its lateral surface spaced from an end surface (7), a first portion of the cylindrical body (6), lying between said end surface (7) and the most closely adjacent ring groove (3), having a varying cross section at any plane parallel with the end surface, the cross section being an oval shape and having a maximum diameter (D1) and a minimum diameter (D2), wherein the difference between the maximum and minimum diameters (D1,D2) of the cross section is at least 0.3% of the maximum diameter (D1).
  • 2. Piston according to claim 1, wherein the difference between the maximum and minimum diameters (D1,D2) of the cross section is at most 3% of the maximum diameter (D1).
  • 3. Piston according to claim 1, wherein the maximum and minimum diameters (D1,D2) increase from the end surface (7) to the most closely adjacent ring groove (3).
  • 4. Piston according to claim 1, wherein the piston is housed in a cylinder (1) with constant diameter and that the difference between the diameter of the cylinder and the minimum diameter (D2) of said cross section of said piston portion (2) is less than 3% of the cylinder diameter, while the difference between the cylinder diameter and the maximum diameter (D1) of said piston portion (2) is greater than 0.3% of the cylinder diameter.
  • 5. Piston according to claim 2, wherein the maximum and minimum diameters (D1,D2) increase from the end surface (7) to the most closely adjacent ring groove (3).
  • 6. Piston according to claim 2, wherein the piston is housed in a cylinder (1) with constant diameter and that the difference between the diameter of the cylinder and the minimum diameter (D2) of said cross section of said piston portion (2) is less than 3% of the cylinder diameter, while the difference between the cylinder diameter and the maximum diameter (D1) of said piston portion (2) is greater than 0.3% of the cylinder diameter.
  • 7. Piston according to claim 3, wherein the piston is housed in a cylinder (1) with constant diameter and that the difference between the diameter of the cylinder and the minimum diameter (D2) of said cross section of said piston portion (2) is less than 3% of the cylinder diameter, while the difference between the cylinder diameter and the maximum diameter (D1) of said piston portion (2) is greater than 0.3% of the cylinder diameter.
Priority Claims (1)
Number Date Country Kind
9700109 Jan 1997 SE
PCT Information
Filing Document Filing Date Country Kind 102e Date 371c Date
PCT/SE98/00056 WO 00 8/11/1999 8/11/1999
Publishing Document Publishing Date Country Kind
WO98/31929 7/23/1998 WO A
US Referenced Citations (9)
Number Name Date Kind
1462501 Barwald Jul 1923
2311039 Emery Feb 1943
4111104 Davison Sep 1978
4256022 Elsbett et al. Mar 1981
4716817 Ripberger et al. Jan 1988
4829955 Strasser May 1989
5072653 Parsons Dec 1991
5211101 Letsch et al. May 1993
5245913 Kato Sep 1993
Foreign Referenced Citations (1)
Number Date Country
755235 Aug 1951 DE