The present invention concerns a method of operating an internal combustion engine-reformer installation having the features of a classifying portion, and such an internal combustion engine-reformer installation having the features of a classifying portion.
In the operation of an internal combustion engine—in particular a gas engine—it may be advantageous for at least a part of the fuel to be reformed into a synthesis gas prior to combustion. That means that endothermic and exothermic reactions take place in a so-called reformer, in which a hydrogen-bearing synthesis gas is obtained from the fuel. The addition of that hydrogen-bearing gas to the combustion mixture makes it possible, for example, to improve the ignition characteristics or to reduce the production of unwanted emissions.
Installations in which both an internal combustion engine and also a reformer are integrated are known in the state of the art, such as the installation in U.S. Pat. No. 6,508,209 B1.
Admittedly, the regulation of a reformer on the basis of a predetermined ratio of steam to carbon or oxygen to carbon is known. It will be noted, however, that these regulation concepts are designed for a production of synthesis gas, that is as constant as possible. They cannot satisfy the varying needs for synthesis gas of an internal combustion engine. A simple solution to that problem would be to maintain a buffer volume of synthesis gas or to produce synthesis gas to a relatively high extent and burn off the excess. Those solutions, however, are not appropriate in energy terms and considerably reduce the efficiency of the installation.
A concept for regulating an internal combustion engine-reformer installation was disclosed in US 2004/0050345 A1. In that case, the desired amount of fuel which is fed to the reformer is determined on the basis of the injection amount of the internal combustion engine.
A disadvantage in that respect is that upon a change in the operating point of the internal combustion engine, the amount of synthesis gas provided is not that which is required at the time but that which corresponds to the operating point prior to the change. In the case of changes in load which in practice occur frequently, the result of this is that significantly too much or too little synthesis gas is delivered to the internal combustion engine.
The object of the invention is to provide an open or closed loop control method for an internal combustion engine-reformer installation, in which precisely the amount of synthesis gas that is required at the time by the internal combustion engine can be afforded by the reformer. In addition, the invention seeks to provide an internal combustion engine-reformer installation which allows such a method to be carried out.
That object is attained by a method described below and by an internal combustion engine-reformer installation described below.
That is effected in that the pressure of the synthesis gas is measured in the synthesis gas line which supplies the synthesis gas from the reformer to the internal combustion engine, and that synthesis gas pressure is then used to determine the desired amount of fuel which is fed to the reformer. In other words, the pressure in the synthesis gas line is constantly held at a level acceptable to the internal combustion engine.
In addition, various parameters of the internal combustion engine can be used to calculate the desired amount of fuel. In particular, a charge pressure or a power output of the internal combustion engine are suitable for that purpose as they are often already measured in any case in the course of control of the internal combustion engine.
For particularly accurate regulation or control, a reformer transfer function can be used to determine the desired amount of fuel. By means of such a reformer transfer function, it is possible to calculate both the composition and also the amount of synthesis gas produced by the reformer. The reformer transfer function can be based on the volume flows and the chemical compositions of the substance flows passing into the reformer. In the simplest case, such a reformer transfer function can be generated by way of a direct measurement of the amount and composition of the synthesis gas produced by the reformer with different entry volume flows and possibly different temperatures.
To keep the chemical conditions in the reformer as optimum as possible, desired ratios of steam to carbon and of oxygen to carbon can be predetermined for the reformer. On the basis of the desired conditions, a desired amount of air and/or a desired amount of exhaust gas and/or a desired amount of steam are determined, and the desired amount of air and/or the desired amount of exhaust gas from the internal combustion engine and/or the desired amount of steam are fed to the reformer.
In this embodiment, a reformer transfer function can be used to determine the desired amount of air and/or the desired amount of exhaust gas and/or the desired amount of steam, whereby the ratios in the reformer can be particularly accurately controlled.
In order, moreover, to be able to determine the composition of the synthesis gas downstream of the reformer with a high level of accuracy, an entry temperature of a substance flow into the reformer and/or an exit temperature of a substance flow out of the reformer can be measured. The entry temperature and/or the exit temperature can be used in determining the desired amount of fuel and/or the desired amount of air and/or the desired amount of exhaust gas and/or the desired amount of steam. In particular, the reformer transfer function can depend on the measured temperatures.
Further advantages and details will be apparent from the Figures and the specific description relating thereto. In the Figures:
In
Arranged in the synthesis gas line 8 is the pressure measuring device 2 which is connected to the closed loop control device 4. Based on the synthesis gas pressure pact measured by the pressure measuring device 2, the desired amount of fuel Qref as well as the desired amount of air, the desired amount of exhaust gas, and the desired amount of steam can be calculated by the closed loop control device 4.
In this embodiment, the various substance flows are brought together prior to the feed to the transformer 1. As a result, it is possible to measure the temperature of the flow into the reformer 1 by a temperature measuring device 12. Likewise, a temperature measuring device 12 for measuring the synthesis gas temperature is arranged in the synthesis gas line 8.
Arranged at the engine 3 is a measuring device 6 whereby the charge pressure P2′ and/or the power output P of the engine 3 can be measured.
Calculation of the desired amount of fuel Qref can be effected in various ways.
In that formula Vcyl, denotes the volume per cylinder of the internal combustion engine, Ncyl, denotes the number of cylinders, Imin denotes the minimum air volume, ηvol denotes the volumetric efficiency, n denotes the instantaneous revolutions per minute of the internal combustion engine, T′2 and P′2 denote the temperature and the pressure respectively of the combustion mixture, and λ denotes the ratio of air to fuel relative to the stoichiometric ratio. In addition, Tn and Pn denote the standard temperature and standard pressure (that is to say Tn=273.15 K and Pn=1.01325 bar). Similar equations based on the power output P of the internal combustion engine or on the charge pressure p′2 and the power output P of the internal combustion engine are known per se to a person skilled in the art.
The pressure pact of the synthesis gas in the synthesis gas line 8 downstream of reformer 1 measured by the pressure measuring device 2 is compared to a reference pressure pref. On the basis of the result of that comparison and the amount Qcal calculated in the closed loop control circuit R1, the desired amount of fuel Qref is calculated in the closed loop control circuit R2. In that respect, for example, the following equation can be used:
Qref=(pref−pact)·γQcalc
Both the reference pressure pref and also the proportionality factor γ are to be empirically determined in the course of calibration of the installation. It is also possible to envisage more complex dependencies so that, for example, the proportionality factor γ could include a time dependency or the like.
Finally, the currently prevailing fuel volume flow which is into the reformer is measured in the closed loop control circuit R3 compared to the desired amount of fuel Qref, and the fuel volume flow is closed loop controlled by way of the valve 5.
That closed loop control concept can be expanded by using, for example, a reformer transfer function. Examples of this are shown in
Qref=(xref−xact)·γ′·Qcalc
In that equation, γ′ denotes a further proportionality factor, Q′calc denotes the result of the closed loop control circuit R2, xref denotes a desired value of a parameter for the composition of the synthesis gas, and xact denotes the evaluation result of the reformer transfer function. In this case, the reformer transfer function depends on the instantaneous substance flows into the reformer, the entry and exit temperatures of the reformer, and the desired ratios S/C and O/C (steam/carbon and oxygen/carbon).
In this embodiment, the reformer transfer function is generated by a direct measurement of the amount and composition of the synthesis gas produced by the reformer at different entry volume flows and different temperatures. It is, however, also possible to ascertain the reformer transfer function by means of a simulation.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
A 1143/2012 | Oct 2012 | AT | national |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4131086 | Noguchi et al. | Dec 1978 | A |
6508209 | Collier, Jr. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
7021048 | Taylor et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7028644 | Cohn et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7177751 | Froloff et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7597068 | Arai et al. | Oct 2009 | B2 |
8396644 | Kabashima et al. | Mar 2013 | B2 |
8486166 | Yahagi et al. | Jul 2013 | B2 |
20030140622 | Taylor, III et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20040028964 | Smaling | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040035395 | Heywood et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040050345 | Bauer | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20070033929 | Telford et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070113803 | Froloff et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20090000575 | Shimada et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20100180838 | Lewis et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100268442 | Kabashima et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
101332761 | Dec 2008 | CN |
2009-97422 | May 2009 | JP |
2010-255442 | Nov 2010 | JP |
2009107454 | Sep 2009 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Austrian Patent Office Search Report (ASR) issued Apr. 26, 2013 in Austrian Patent Application No. A 1143/2012. |
Unofficial English Translation of German Office Action issued in connection with corresponding DE Application No. 102013016741.8 on Mar. 9, 2015. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20140109853 A1 | Apr 2014 | US |