This application claims priority from Japanese Patent Application Serial No. 2005-362587, filed 16th Dec. 2005, the entire contents of which are expressly incorporated herein by reference.
1. Field of the Invention
The present invention generally relates to multi-cylinder internal combustion engines having a plurality of cylinders arranged in an array. In particular, the present invention relates to an improved crankshaft bearing structure suitable for an internal combustion engine equipped with a multilink-type piston-crank mechanism.
2. Background Information
Most internal combustion engines used in vehicles have a plurality of cylinders with a piston reciprocating in each of the cylinder and a crankshaft that is linked to the pistons by a piston-crank linking mechanism. Some internal combustion engines use a multilink-type piston-crank mechanism in which upper links are connected to piston pins of the pistons and lower links connect the upper links to crankpins of the crankshaft. One example of a multilink-type piston-crank mechanism is disclosed in Japanese Unexamined Patent Application Publication No. 2002-61501. In this type of multilink-type piston-crank, when the piston-stroke characteristics change, an excessive force acts on specific crankshaft bearings as a result of inertia force exerted on the crank bearings from crank rotating systems, thus making it difficult to attain sufficient bearing strength.
In view of the above, it will be apparent to those skilled in the art from this disclosure that there exists a need for an improved multilink-type piston-crank mechanism. This invention addresses this need in the art as well as other needs, which will become apparent to those skilled in the art from this disclosure.
One object of the invention to improve upon the above mentioned conventional technology. Other objects and advantages of the invention will become apparent from the following description, claims and drawings.
According to one aspect of the invention, an internal combustion engine is provided that basically comprises a cylinder block, a plurality of pistons, a crankshaft, a plurality of crankshaft bearings, a piston-crank mechanism and at least one of the plurality of crankshaft bearings. The cylinder block has a plurality of cylinders. One of the pistons is slidable disposed in one of the cylinders to move between a top dead center and a bottom dead center. Each of the pistons includes a piston pin. The crankshaft is disposed below the cylinders and extending in a direction in which the cylinders are arranged, the crankshaft including a plurality of journals and a plurality of crankpins disposed between adjacent pairs of the journals. The crankshaft bearings rotatably support the crankshaft on the cylinder block via the journals. The piston-crank mechanism links the crankshaft and the pistons together by the crankpins and the piston pins. The piston-crank mechanism is configured and arranged such that an upward inertia force is produced near the top dead center of each of the pistons that is smaller than a downward inertia force produced near the bottom dead center of the pistons. At least one of the plurality of crankshaft bearings is disposed between an adjacent pair of the cylinders. The adjacent pair of the cylinders have a relationship in which one of the pistons in one of the adjacent pair of the cylinders is near the top dead center when the other of the pistons in the other of the adjacent pair of the cylinders is near the bottom dead center. The at least one of the crankshaft bearings has a higher rigidity than the remaining ones of the crankshaft bearings.
Within the scope of this application it is envisaged that the various aspects, embodiments and alternatives set out in the preceding paragraphs, in the claims and in the following description may be taken individually or in any combination thereof.
Referring now to the attached drawings which form a part of this original disclosure:
Selected embodiments of the present invention will now be explained with reference to the drawings. It will be apparent to those skilled in the art from this disclosure that the following descriptions of the embodiments of the present invention are provided for illustration only and not for the purpose of limiting the invention as defined by the appended claims and their equivalents.
Preferred embodiments of the present invention are described below with reference to the drawings. In the following description, the term “up” refers to the direction in which a piston moves towards its top dead center position (the similar terms “upward” or “upper” are to be construed in a similar manner) and the term “down” refers to the direction in which a piston moves towards its bottom dead centre position (the similar terms “downward”, bottom” and “lower” are to be construed in a similar manner). The term “front-back direction” refers to the direction from the front to the back of an engine or the direction in which cylinders are arranged.
Generally, a cylinder block for a vehicle is made of a solid casting, and comprises a cylinder portion having a plurality of cylinders (i.e. cylinder bores) and a crankcase portion. The plurality of cylinders in the cylinder portion are arranged in the front-back direction of the engine (Note: the arrangement of the cylinders may alternatively be referred to as the cylinder-arrangement direction), and the crankcase portion covers a crankshaft that extends below the cylinder portion in the cylinder-arrangement direction and connecting rods connected to crankpins of the crankshaft.
The crankshaft has journals which are rotatably supported by the cylinder block by using crankshaft bearings. Each of the crankshaft bearings includes a partition- or film-like bulkhead that extends downward between adjacent cylinders from the lower end of the cylinder portion towards the inside of the crankcase portion, and a bearing cap that is fixed to the lower surface of the bulkhead while holding the corresponding journal of the crankshaft from opposite sides. The lower surface of each bulkhead and the upper surface of each bearing cap both have semicircular notches for rotatably supporting the corresponding journal of the crankshaft. Generally, each of the bulkheads is integrated with the cylinder block and has its opposite sides integrally joined to inner walls of the crankcase portion.
In an inline four-cylinder internal combustion engine, the first to fourth cylinders are arranged in that order from the front of the engine in the front-back direction of the engine. A total of five crankshaft bearings (constituted by the bulkheads and the bearing caps) are provided, three of which are disposed between adjacent cylinders, one of which is in front of the first cylinder (which is the front most cylinder of the engine), and one of which is behind the fourth cylinder (which is the rearmost cylinder of the engine). The five crankshaft bearings will be referred to as first to fifth crankshaft bearings in that order from the front of the engine. The thickness of the first to fifth crankshaft bearings, that is, the dimension thereof in the front-back direction of the engine, may be set such that the first and fifth crankshaft bearings at the front and back sides of the internal combustion engine are thinner than the remaining second to fourth intermediate crankshaft bearings. In that case, the three remaining second to fourth crankshaft bearings disposed between adjacent cylinders generally have the same dimension.
In this mechanism, the piston pin of each piston and the corresponding crankpin of the crankshaft are linked to each other by using a plurality of links. By changing the restricting condition of one of the links, the top dead center position of the piston may be altered, thus allowing the engine compression ratio to be changed. Consequently, since the compression ratio can be controlled to an optimal value in accordance with the operating conditions of the engine, this mechanism contributes to higher efficiency and power and lower emissions for the internal combustion engine. It is further noted that by setting the links to appropriate dimensions and layouts, appropriate piston-stroke characteristics can be attained which are unattainable with a single-link type mechanism in which each piston pin and the corresponding crankpin are linked by using a single link (i.e. a connecting rod). Specifically, in comparison to a single-link type mechanism, the acceleration of each piston in a multilink mechanism is lower near the top dead center of the piston. This mechanism therefore effectively reduces secondary vibration that can occur during operation of the engine.
The multilink mechanism is also provided with compression-ratio changing mechanism for changing the compression ratio of the engine. Specifically, the compression-ratio changing mechanism can alter the position of the rocking fulcrum for each control link 8 and can thus change the restricting condition for the movement of the corresponding lower link 6. Altering the position/restricting condition in this manner alters the position of the top dead center of the corresponding piston 1 which therefore changes the engine compression ratio.
The compression-ratio changing mechanism comprises a control shaft 7 which is disposed diagonally below and parallel to the crankshaft 4 and is rotatably supported by the cylinder block 12, a plurality of control cams 7A (four control cams 7A in this example) provided on the control shaft 7 in correspondence to the cylinders, and a variable-compression-ratio actuator 31 (see
The center of each control cam 7A, which serves as a rocking fulcrum for the corresponding control link 8, is eccentric to the center of rotation of the control shaft 7. Consequently, the position of the rocking fulcrum for each control link 8 with respect to the cylinder block 12 alters depending on the rotational position of the control shaft 7, thus changing the distance between the corresponding crankpin 5 and the corresponding piston pin 2. The upper links 3 and the lower links 6 are coupled to each other by using upper pins 9, and the control links 8 and the lower links 6 are coupled to each other by using control pins 10.
In a case where the multilink mechanism is not equipped with such a compression-ratio changing function, the control shaft 7 is given a simplified structure that does not have the control cams 7A disposed eccentrically to the center of rotation of the control shaft 7. In that case, the control links 8 may be rotatably attached to the control shaft 7.
The crankshaft 4 comprises five (main) journals 4A that are rotatably supported by the cylinder block 12 by using five respective crankshaft bearings 11a to 11e, and a total of four crankpins 5 disposed between adjacent journals 4A. Moreover, the journals 4A and the crankpins 5 have balance weights 4B disposed therebetween.
As also shown in
The cylinder block 12 is made of a solid casting and includes a plurality of cylinders, namely, cylinder bores 28 arranged in the front-back direction of the engine, which is the cylinder-arrangement direction. The bulkheads 26 are integrated with the cylinder block 12 and are partition- or film-like bulkheads that extend downward between adjacent cylinder bores 28 from the lower end of the cylinder bores 28. Moreover, the opposite sides of each bulkhead 26 are integrally joined to inner walls of the cylinder block 12.
The ladder frame 13 has a lattice-like or ladder-like skeletal structure of high strength, and includes a plurality of first bearing caps 27 integrally linked to each other. Opposite side walls 13A of the ladder frame 13 are respectively fixed to lower surfaces of the opposite side walls of the cylinder block 12.
The ladder frame 13 and the cylinder block 12 can therefore be viewed as together defining a part of the outline of the internal combustion engine. For this reason, the cylinder block 12 is sometimes referred to as an upper block and the ladder frame 13 is referred to as a lower block. The lower side of the ladder frame 13 has second bearing caps 14 fastened thereto with the bolts 22 and 23. Each of the second bearing caps 14 holds the control shaft 7 from opposite sides. The lower surface of the ladder frame 13 and the upper surface of each second bearing cap 14 have semi-cylindrical notches that constitute a control-shaft bearing surface 20 for rotatably supporting the control shaft 7.
Excluding highly rigid bearing caps 14a, which are described in greater detail below, the ladder frame 13 and the cylinder block 12 are joined to each other with the bolt (21) that is farthest from the control shaft 7. With the two bolts 22 and 23 on opposite sides of the control shaft 7, the ladder frame 13 and each second bearing cap 14 are fastened together securely to the cylinder block 12.
It is noted that the engine displacement and operating conditions are the same between the single-link and the multilink engines. In each engine, the cylinders are ignited at 180° crank-angle intervals in the following order: first cylinder, third cylinder, fourth cylinder, and second cylinder. The differences obtained by comparing
The bearing force applied to each crankshaft bearing, particularly, the maximum value of the bearing force, varies depending on the design parameters of the internal combustion engine. The design parameters may, for example, include the magnitude of the maximum internal pressure of the cylinders, the maximum revolving speed, and the mass of the moving elements. If the internal combustion engine is to be used in a vehicle, the following differences may occur between a single-link engine and a multilink engine. According to the single-link engine in
The reason for such differences in the bearing forces operative on the bearings occur is described below. As shown in
Referring again to
Referring to
On the other hand, in the multilink engine shown in
The difference in the relationship between the inertia force and the combustion pressure is caused by a difference in the inertia force characteristics of a cylinder between the single-link and the multilink engines. In view of a crank throw of one cylinder,
In contrast, in the multilink engine, the piston acceleration near the top dead center of each piston is set lower than that near the bottom dead center in order to reduce secondary vibration occurring during operation. Thus, the upward inertia force near the top dead center of each piston, namely, a maximum upward inertia force value (C), is smaller than the downward inertia force near the bottom dead center of the piston, namely, a maximum downward inertia force value (D). If such piston-stroke characteristics are adapted to a four-cycle inline four-cylinder internal combustion engine, a typical problem that may occur is one in which a particularly large maximum force acts on the second and fourth crankshaft bearings 11b and 11d.
Another of the points, within one engine cycle of the internal combustion engine, at which the second crankshaft bearing 11b receives a maximum force is at the point of timing equal to the combustion timing for the second cylinder. In this case, the forces exerted on the second crankshaft bearing 11b from the first cylinder side and second cylinder side are inverted relative to the above description. Moreover, it is noted that the force characteristics of the fourth crankshaft bearing 11d are substantially similar to the force characteristics of the second crankshaft bearing 11b, and are different only in that the maximum-force timings (crank angles) are different between the two in accordance with the different combustion timings for the cylinders.
Based on the difference in force characteristics described above, for the single-link engine, there is no problem in setting substantially the same strength and rigidity for the second, third, and fourth crankshaft bearings 11b to 11d (as measured from the front of the engine). However, for the multilink engine, if the second to fourth crankshaft bearings 11b to 11d are given the same rigidity, the second and fourth crankshaft bearings 11b and 11d that locally receive a force of large magnitude may lack bearing strength or may need to be increased in weight and size in order to attain sufficient bearing strength.
In view of these circumstances, in the first to fourth embodiments to be described below, the second and fourth crankshaft bearings 11b and 11d are given higher rigidity than the remaining crankshaft bearings 11a, 11c and 11e. These crankshaft bearings having higher rigidity will hereinafter be referred to as “highly-rigid bearings”. In the embodiments to be described below, the basic structure of the multilink-type piston-crank mechanism is the same as that of the example shown in relation to
A first embodiment of the present invention will now be described with reference to
The mechanism for substantially reducing the maximum forces acting on the highly-rigid bearings 11b and 11d by using providing different rigidities is described below with reference to
Although the above description is directed to a mechanism corresponding to the combustion timing for the first cylinder, the force acting on the second crankshaft bearing 11b also reaches a maximum value at the combustion timing for the second cylinder. In that case, the force mechanism is inverted between the first cylinder side and the second cylinder side in
A modified embodiment of the second and third embodiments is also permissible. Specifically, the second bearing caps attached below the second crankshaft bearing 11b and the fourth crankshaft bearing 11d may be defined by highly-rigid bearing caps 14a having a larger dimension in the width direction of the engine than the remaining second bearing caps, and only one of the highly-rigid bearing caps 14a may have the housing 24 of the variable-compression-ratio actuator 31 mounted therebelow. This allows for an achievement of substantially the same effect as in the second and third embodiments.
In the fourth embodiment, the bulkheads 26 of the highly-rigid bearings 11b and 11d have no recesses as in
In particular, in this embodiment, since the recesses 25 are provided above the corresponding crankshaft bearing surfaces 19, the rigidity can be reduced locally and intensively in the vertical direction of the pistons, which is the direction in which a maximum force is exerted. Accordingly, in comparison to the crankshaft bearings 11a, 11c and 11e that are provided with the recesses 25, the rigidity of the second and fourth crankshaft bearings 11b and 11d in the vertical direction of the pistons is effectively increased, such that sufficient bearing strength is attained and reduced weight and dimensions are achieved at a higher level.
In addition, similar to the second and third embodiments, the crankshaft bearings 11a to 11e may be arranged along the front-back direction of the engine, such that a common component such as a bearing metal can be used and the design and manufacturing of the cylinder block 12 and the crankshaft 4 can be simplified.
Except for the recess 25 in the fifth crankshaft bearing 11e, which recess also serves as a back wall for the cylinder block 12, the remaining recesses 25 may be replaced by through holes extending through the corresponding bulkheads 26 in the front-back direction of the engine.
Based on the above description, the distinctive structure and advantages of the present invention will be described below. The elements of the present invention are not limited to those indicated by reference numerals in the drawings, and modifications are permissible within the scope and spirit of the present invention.
The cylinder block 12 has first to fourth cylinders arranged in the cylinder-arrangement direction. In each cylinder, a piston 1 is slidably movable in the vertical direction. The crankshaft 4 extends in the cylinder-arrangement direction below the first to fourth cylinders. The crankshaft 4 includes a plurality ofjournals 4A that are rotatably supported by the cylinder block 12 by using crankshaft bearings 11a to 11e; a plurality of crankpins 5 disposed between adjacent journals 4A; and a piston-crank mechanism that links each crankpin 5 with the piston pin 2 of the corresponding piston 1.
According to the piston-crank mechanism, an upward inertia force C near the top dead center of each piston is set lower than a downward inertia force D near the bottom dead center thereof (see
As shown in
Therefore, the crankshaft bearings 11b and 11d are given higher rigidity than the remaining crankshaft bearings 11a and 11c and 11e. As described above, of adjacent crankshaft bearings, the crankshaft bearing that is subject to greater deformation tends to receive a greater percentage of force distributed to the crankshaft bearings. Therefore, by increasing the rigidity of the highly-rigid bearings 11b and 11d that are assumed to receive a large force, the bearing strength thereof is increased and the deformation thereof is alleviated. This lowers the percentage of force distributed to the highly-rigid bearings 11b and 11d. By achieving an appropriate distributed-force percentage, the actual force acting on the highly-rigid bearings 11b and 11d is reduced so that the unevenness in forces acting on the crankshaft bearings 11a to 11e can be reduced or counterbalanced. Accordingly, the bearing strength can be effectively increased while preventing an increase in weight and size.
More specifically, referring to
Preferably, as in the second to fourth embodiments shown in
In a four-cycle inline four-cylinder internal combustion engine, four cylinders, namely, first to fourth cylinders, and five crankshaft bearings 11a to 11e are arranged in the front-back direction of the engine. The second and fourth crankshaft bearings 11b and 11d from the front of the engine serve as highly-rigid bearings having higher rigidity than the first, third, and fifth crankshaft bearings 11a, 11c and 11e from the front of the engine.
More specifically, the radial rigidity of the third crankshaft bearing 11c from the front the internal combustion engine is lower than the radial rigidity of the second crankshaft bearing 11b and the fourth crankshaft bearing 11d from the front of the internal combustion engine. Thus, the degree of deformation of the third crankshaft bearing 11c in the radial direction thereof, which is caused by an inertia force of the second cylinder or the fourth cylinder, becomes greater than the degree of deformation of the second or fourth crankshaft bearings 11b and 11d. Consequently, the distributed force received by the third crankshaft bearing 11c increases, whereas the distributed force received by the second crankshaft bearing 11b and the fourth crankshaft bearing 11d (in response to the inertia force of the second and third cylinders respectively) decrease. Accordingly, this prevents the second and fourth crankshaft bearings 11b and 11d from receiving an excessive force.
Furthermore, the radial rigidity of the first crankshaft bearing 11a (at the front of the internal combustion engine) is lower than the radial rigidity of the second crankshaft bearing 11b from the front of the internal combustion engine. Therefore, the degree of deformation of the first crankshaft bearing 11a in the radial direction thereof caused by an inertia force of the first cylinder becomes greater than the degree of deformation of the second crankshaft bearing 11b. Consequently, the distributed force received by the first crankshaft bearing 11a increases, whereas the distributed force received by the second crankshaft bearing 11b in response to the inertia force of the first cylinder decreases. Accordingly, this prevents the second crankshaft bearing 11b from receiving an excessive force.
Furthermore, the radial rigidity of the fifth crankshaft bearing 11e from the front of the internal combustion engine is lower than the radial rigidity of the fourth crankshaft bearing 11d from the front of the internal combustion engine. Therefore, the degree of deformation of the fifth crankshaft bearing 11e in the radial direction thereof caused by an inertia force of the fourth cylinder becomes greater than the degree of deformation of the fourth crankshaft bearing 11d. Consequently, the distributed force received by the fifth crankshaft bearing 11e increases, whereas the distributed force received by the fourth crankshaft bearing 11d in response to the inertia force of the fourth cylinder decreases. Accordingly, this prevents the fourth crankshaft bearing 11d in the multilink-type internal combustion engine from receiving an excessive force.
Furthermore, the vertical rigidity (i.e. the rigidity in the vertical direction of the pistons) of the third, first, or fifth crankshaft bearings 11c, 11a, or 11e from the front of the internal combustion engine is lower than the vertical rigidity of the second crankshaft bearing 11b and the fourth crankshaft bearing 11d from the front of the internal combustion engine. Thus, the force-reducing effect on the second and fourth crankshaft bearings 11b and 11d is notably achieved particularly in the vertical direction, which is the direction in which a maximum force is exerted on the crankshaft bearings 11b and 11d.
In the first embodiment shown in
In the second to fourth embodiments shown in
In a multilink engine, the acceleration of each piston near the top dead center thereof is set lower than that in a single-link engine. Thus, as compared with single-link engines, secondary vibration occurring during operation of each piston is reduced, and moreover, the piston-stroke rate can be set relatively low near the top dead center and relatively high near the bottom dead center. Setting a low piston-stroke rate near the top dead center of each piston means lowering the rate of increase in the combustion chamber capacity within a crank-angle range for the first half of an expansion stroke. Therefore, the degree of pressure drop in the combustion chamber within this crank-angle range is reduced, whilst the degree of temperature drop in the combustion chamber is simultaneously reduced. Consequently, the combustion rate for the first half of an expansion stroke can be maintained at a high rate, thereby effectively reducing the length of the combustion period. As a result, even during a high-load operation, in which a large amount of intake air is supercharged into the combustion chamber using, for example, a supercharger, the exhaust gas temperature is prevented from increasing drastically. Moreover, the amount of air-fuel mixture that bums within the crank-angle range for the first half of an expansion stroke increases so that the percentage thereof that is effectively converted to engine output increases. Accordingly, the thermal efficiency of the engine is improved.
Furthermore, there is readily provided a function for changing the compression ratio of the engine by altering the position of the rocking fulcrum (control cam 7A) for each control link 8 to change the position of the top dead center of the corresponding piston with respect to the multilink mechanism. In detail, referring to
In the second embodiment shown in
In the second and third embodiments shown in
Furthermore, according to the second and third embodiments shown in
In the fourth embodiment shown in
The preceding description has been presented only to illustrate and describe possible embodiments of the claimed invention. It is not intended to be exhaustive or to limit the invention to any precise form disclosed. It will be understood by those skilled in the art that various changes may be made and equivalents may be substituted for elements thereof without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention. Therefore, it is intended that the invention not be limited to the particular embodiments disclosed as the best mode contemplated for carrying out this invention but that the invention can widely be adapted to multi-cylinder internal combustion engines with an array of a plurality of cylinders formed with various layouts and will include all embodiments falling within the scope of the appended claims.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2005-362587 | Dec 2005 | JP | national |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5441019 | Sayer et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
20050078895 | Kanbe et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1154134 | Nov 2001 | EP |
1361350 | Nov 2003 | EP |
1431617 | Jun 2004 | EP |
1533495 | May 2005 | EP |
2002-61501 | Feb 2002 | JP |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20070137606 A1 | Jun 2007 | US |