This application is a 371 National Stage Application of International Application No. PCT/US00/22476, filed Aug. 16, 2000, which claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/149,214, filed Aug. 16, 1999.
1. Technical Field
The present invention relates to Internet connections. More particularly, the present invention relates to a new connection platform for connecting to the Internet that provides an ease of use to a user as does a phone jack.
2. Description of the Prior Art
Internet Appliances Vs. Internet-Ready Appliances
Internet appliances already appear in the form of Web enabled televisions, screen phones, Web Tablets, and Email Readers, that take advantage of the Internet to send and receive data, browse Web sites, and other computer-type activities. Internet appliances may be characterized as requiring an Internet connection for primary usage, or as being permanently attached to an Internet link. In the latter case, the device may not need to be on-line continuously, but might always be attached to a phone jack or to some other Internet connection.
A new class of devices will soon emerge that will use the Internet to simply augment primary functions, and that will not require a permanent hook up to an Internet link nor will even require the Internet to function. Of such herein cited portable and/or Internet optional function devices (herein referred to interchangeably as Internet-ready devices or appliances), connection is required only when updating, sending, or receiving information. Internet-ready device categories may include, but are not limited to, toys, electronic books, personal health monitors, and MP-3 players, for example. A child's toy or an electronic book may need only to connect to a specific Web site when downloading new content. After downloading the content, the device may be taken anywhere to be played with or used. Other devices such as digital cameras may need only to be connected when sending pictures to a photo-developing center, to relatives, or to remote displays.
A notable characteristic of Internet-ready devices is that they are all mass market consumer electronic type products, and as such have very real cost and price constraints. It is noted that embedding necessary logic to connect a device to the Internet means adding a modem, a CPU, a network stack, memory, and miscellaneous glue logic to the device. While the costs of adding such components are decreasing, for example, adding $10-$20 in parts, it is noted that adding such cost to a device selling for $25 is probably not practical.
Using the PC as the Connection
Today the PC is used as an interfacing device for the new class of Internet-ready appliances. The percentage of households owning PC's continues to grow, making a PC a more prevalent platform on which to base a solution. An Internet enabled PC will already have a modem installed, along with a powerful processor, advanced operating system, and more than sufficient memory. The PC can easily accept new software drivers to communicate to attached devices, through serial ports, parallel ports, USB's, 1394's, or any other input-output (I/O) bus structure. However, there are many well-documented problems with the solution of using PC's as the connection, such problems including ease of use, cost, and security. These issues make the PC an expensive and cumbersome solution at best, and an intimidating and adoption hindrance in the worst case.
A computer, with all of the advances in technology, is the most sophisticated and technically complicated product in many households. Installing device drivers, successfully attaching an appliance, and configuring network connections are not for the faint of heart, and certainly not for the typical consumer electronics user. While driver installation is automated in recent releases, resolving driver conflicts and configuring parameters is not a task with which most users can cope. If an Internet-ready device is a child's toy, the process described herein above would most likely require adult supervision or visa-versa in many homes. Therefore, the process may be one that could not be performed by anyone. Techno-phobia may be enough to keep the solution of installing device drivers, successfully attaching an appliance, and configuring network connections from becoming the one of choice.
Cost is another major concern with using the PC as the connection platform. While a more than capable PC can be obtained for well under $1000 today, the price tag is still beyond the point where people can afford to put one in every room of the house. Clearly, a proper solution is one in which the price of the connection feature makes it possible for homes to have multiple ports. The price of a telephone is a good analogy. When the cost of a phone was relatively high, most families had one phone centrally located within the home. As the cost of a phone dropped, people began putting one in every bedroom, the den, and even the bathroom.
Security and data integrity is another issue with using computers as the Internet connection platform. Various entry points in the upload and download process can be altered by users because the computer is not a closed system, thereby possibly violating the intended use by manufacturers. Take, for example, imagining a parent's concern if adult audio clips are downloaded into talking toys, or if downloadable game consoles access unauthorized pirate sites. These are concerns that also worry manufacturers of Internet-ready appliances, because it's their image, reputation, and revenues that are affected. Safe guards, such as, for example, the RSAC initiative, help in providing a process by which only intended content may be downloaded. However, this type of rating scheme depends upon compliant browsers and upon proper browser setup to be effective. Also, such rating scheme cited herein above does not prevent a user from accessing unauthorized sites.
Clearly, a new connection platform is needed to service the class of Internet-ready appliances. The new connection platform must meet required cost, security, and ease of use points that today are lacking in a computer oriented solution. At the same time the new connection platform must provide a standard connection port and must offer performance levels to which consumer electronic users have become accustomed. System crashes and long boot times are accepted behaviors in a PC world, however, are causes for product returns for normal personal electronics. It would therefore be advantageous to provide a preferred solution that is as stable as a television, and as cost affordable as a telephone.
It would be advantageous to provide a new connection platform that makes it possible to have such a new connection platform for each possible Internet connection point in the home, whether the possible Internet connection point is a telephone jack, cable connection, or other means.
It would be advantageous to provide a new connection platform system that is closed. That is, at no point does a user have to intervene or provide any additional information. When such a system is closed, the Internet connection only goes to the site specified by the appliance.
It is noted that the prior art is using PC's as the connection to the Internet.
It is also noted that prior art combines Internet related components into one device, such as, for example, the Web TV box that contains, but is not limited to, a modem, protocol handler, network stack, Internet interface and telephone interface.
The claimed invention herein provides a simple, economical, and safe way to connect a new class of Internet-ready devices and appliances to the Internet without the use of a personal computer (PC). The claimed invention herein provides an Internet dial-tone, so to speak, to applications ranging from toys and entertainment consoles to electronic books and health equipment just as a traditional telephone jack provides a plain old telephone system (POTS) dial-tone for phones, modems, and fax machines. The invention herein features a modem, network stack, and application protocols alleviating the need for sophisticated logic within attached devices. With one-touch, appliances can quickly and easily connect to the Internet.
The claimed invention herein provides a simple, economical, and safe way to connect a new class of Internet-ready devices and appliances to the Internet without the use of a personal computer (PC). The claimed invention herein provides an Internet dial-tone, so to speak, to applications ranging from toys and entertainment consoles to electronic books and health equipment just as a traditional telephone jack provides a plain old telephone system (POTS) dial-tone for phones, modems, and fax machines. The invention herein features a modem, network stack, and application protocols alleviating the need for sophisticated logic within attached devices. With one-touch, appliances can quickly and easily connect to the Internet.
The Internet Jack
The claimed invention herein, also referred to herein as an Internet Jack, fulfills the need for a new connection platform discussed herein above in the Background section. The invention is generic enough to support a wide variety of devices from entertainment products to health equipment. Using the invention, any device requiring Internet connectivity is able to plug into an Internet Jack just as any device requiring power may be plugged into an AC outlet. The Internet Jack provides an Internet dial tone that furnishes a well-defined set of features and/or services and is similar to a telephone or cable TV jack. These services include, but are not limited to, providing a platform for Internet connectivity, all network protocol processing, and standard data decoding. Because these services are provided in a separate jack that can be used by a multitude and variety of products, the added cost of providing these services are removed from Internet-ready appliances. Therefore, adding such services and/or features through the claimed invention is much more practical and economical for mainstream consumer electronic products, than adding them to the products themselves.
The preferred embodiment the invention has a minimum of two connection ports. One port attaches to a telephone or other Internet conduit. The second port is used for any Internet-ready device to attach. A simple one-touch operation allows a user to easily connect the device to the Internet, and thereby retrieve or send data. An indicator is provided on the claimed invention to inform the user when the desired operation is complete. Because the invention is designed for the purpose of providing Internet connectivity for this new class of Internet-ready appliances, its user interface is streamlined in such a way that any person familiar with plugging in electronic products into wall outlets can perform the operation. Display indicators on the invention can range, for example, from simple light emitting diodes (LED's) to small liquid crystal displays (LCD) screens that inform users on the status of operations. Ease of use is a main design criterion of the invention.
In the preferred embodiment, total silicon cost for the claimed invention ranges from under $10 on up depending on modem type used and other features incorporated into the device. The invention is thereby cost affordable to build as a standalone device or to embed into other devices that attach to telephone jacks, for example.
It is noted that with new Internet capable phones, answering machines, and fax machines, and the like, the cost of adding an Internet jack is almost negligible because such devices already contain the modem and network stack blocks. Furthermore, most of these devices also include protocol support, so that the only additional cost is for the Internet jack interface and physical connector for Internet-ready devices. Therefore, the added cost of an Internet jack to such devices is under one dollar.
It is noted that other physical Internet connections, such as, for example, cable modems can also be supported. The claimed invention can easily be added to, for example, STB's, Ethernet hubs, or other hubs that attach to any of the new home networking standards.
In the latter scenario described herein above, in another preferred embodiment, the Internet jack is a standalone device having a network connection on one end, and an Internet-ready device connector on the other. This implementation is depicted in
It is noted that examples of a home network 230 include, but are not limited to, a standard Ethernet, telephone line, electrical outlines, and wireless means. Examples of an Internet appliance 250 include, but are by no means limited to, Web TV box, email, and a telephone.
It is noted that in the preferred embodiment, the claimed invention is a closed system that thereby provides additional advantage. As an example, an Internet-ready device provides information such as a URL or mail server name to the Internet jack. The Internet jack connects and then retrieves or sends the information. At no point does the user need to intervene or provide additional information. Also because the system is closed, the Internet connection only goes to the site specified by the appliance.
In one embodiment, a closed system such as described herein above uses a rating system, such as, for example, RSAC effectively on retrieved data. That is, all data must pass through the Internet jack prior to being downloaded to the Internet-ready device. In scenarios where a rating is used, the device would pass a rating level along with the target URL, mail server, or the like. Once data is retrieved from the target URL, mail server, or the like, it is filtered by the Internet jack, whereupon the Internet jack only passes along such data to the Internet-ready appliance if the data does not exceed the stated rating level.
In other embodiments, other security schemes are implemented to prevent accessing information on unauthorized sites. In this situation and in one embodiment, a key code is passed from the device to an Internet site, which then uses a pre-agreed upon algorithm to generate a response. This response is then sent back to the device thus authenticating the site to the device. This same mechanism can be used in the reverse path to prevent unauthorized devices from accessing a particular site.
In this embodiment, the manufacturer's Internet site 330 is required only to keep one email message in the account, the message conveying the latest sound bytes for the toy. Examples of latest sounds bytes include, but are not limited to, sounds associated with seasonal events such as, for example, holidays, or sounds associated with media, such as, for example, television programs or movie releases. When the sounds file is downloaded onto the Internet jack 310, it is parsed by the jack 310. A typical example of the sound file is a .wav file. The data is decoded by the jack 310 and sent to the toy 300. Typically, for example, the Internet jack 310 strips headers and the like from the file sent by the manufacture's site 330, and only sends the a pure sound file, or .wav file, to the toy 300.
The Internet jack 310 is not required to understand the data because the only service it provides in this situation is to pass requested data to the toy 300. It is the toy that determines the data as new sound data. The toy stores and processes the data accordingly. The toy 300 is required only to have capabilities to communicate with the Internet jack 310 and to store new information it receives. The toy is not required to have any network protocol knowledge or modem capabilities. Therefore, manufacturers can incorporate Internet jack connectivity and usage into products of all price ranges.
The electronic book is another example of an Internet-ready device. By connecting the electronic book to an Internet jack a user can download new content for the book without using or being required to use a computer. In this example the book provides a URL to the Internet jack. Once a connection is established the requested HTML page is downloaded and sent to the electronic book. Because the Internet-ready device contains an LCD screen, the device displays a list of books from which the user may select. The user selects a choice that causes the device to send to the Internet jack another URL. Requested data is then retrieved and delivered to the electronic book. HTTP can also be used to post credit card information or account numbers for billing purposes. If the electronic book is for a general reader, the book may not have any rating restrictions. However, in cases when the book is a child's book the book may provide along with the target URL a rating level that reflects the level of information it can accept. The resulting downloaded HTML data is then parsed. The ratings tag is checked prior to sending the downloaded requested information to the electronic book.
It is noted that the logical blocks can be implemented in hardware or software.
Another embodiment comprises the same components as in
It is noted that the preferred embodiment depicted by
Other Devices
In another embodiment, along with provided protocols a raw socket interface is also supported by the claimed invention herein. The raw socket feature allows Internet-ready devices to use protocols, such as, for example, Telnet and RSH that are not necessarily natively supplied by the Internet jack.
When using a raw socket interface, the Internet-ready device supplies information such as, for example, a type of connection requested, such as, for example, TCP/UDP, the target Internet site, such as, for example, a server name, URL, or IP address, and target port number. Any data received by the raw socket connection is passed to the attached Internet-ready device. This operation mode is optional and is not needed for simpler applications.
Internet Jack Feature Specifications
Table A herein below provides a summary of features provided by the preferred embodiment of the Internet jack invention claimed herein.
With the advent of Internet-ready devices, a solution to connect these appliances to the Internet in a cost-affordable, safe, and easy to use method is needed. The Internet jack invention claimed herein provides these cited advantages in a well-defined closed system. The Internet jack invention claimed herein is designed to address, among other concepts, a particular market need in a most manufacturer-friendly and user-friendly manner possible in the spirit of the concept that the consumer electronics world is dominated by point solutions.
It is noted that the Internet jack invention does not preclude the use of the PC as a connection platform. The new connection platform claimed herein is compatible with the concept that it is expected that the PC can be used along with the Internet jack to provide a more feature-rich connection environment.
It is noted that communication protocol between Internet-ready devices and the Internet jack invention is the same as that between Internet-ready devices and a computer. Therefore, manufacturers are not required to build multiple versions or a variety of products to compensate for compatibility, wherein compatibility problems are due to specific products depending on specific connection platforms.
For example, citing the talking toy example herein above, a PC stores past files for reloading previous sound bytes. In another example, citing the electronic book example herein above, a PC stores a digital library. In contrast, the Internet jack invention herein provides a simple alternative, low cost, secure, and easy to use substitute for applications that require a PC.
In conclusion, the claimed invention herein provides a solution to the problem of making the new class of Internet-ready appliances a reality because it incorporates necessary networking logic, thereby providing to the market a ubiquitous Internet dial-tone.
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/US00/22476 | 8/16/2000 | WO | 00 | 2/13/2002 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO01/13583 | 2/22/2001 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
212889 | Bridenthal, Jr. et al. | Mar 1879 | A |
4807111 | Cohen et al. | Feb 1989 | A |
4839851 | Maki | Jun 1989 | A |
5012489 | Burton et al. | Apr 1991 | A |
5056058 | Hirata et al. | Oct 1991 | A |
5161193 | Lampson et al. | Nov 1992 | A |
5163131 | Row et al. | Nov 1992 | A |
5303344 | Yokoyama et al. | Apr 1994 | A |
5307413 | Denzer | Apr 1994 | A |
5426694 | Hebert | Jun 1995 | A |
5430727 | Callon | Jul 1995 | A |
5440551 | Suzuki | Aug 1995 | A |
5455599 | Cabral et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
5485460 | Schrier et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
5495480 | Yoshida | Feb 1996 | A |
5499353 | Kadlec et al. | Mar 1996 | A |
5513324 | Dolin, Jr. et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
5519704 | Farinacci et al. | May 1996 | A |
5544357 | Huei | Aug 1996 | A |
5546453 | Hebert | Aug 1996 | A |
5566170 | Bakke et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5577105 | Baum et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
5577172 | Vatland et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
5577237 | Lin | Nov 1996 | A |
5581686 | Koppolu et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5596702 | Stucka et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
5598410 | Stone | Jan 1997 | A |
5619650 | Bach et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5621434 | Marsh | Apr 1997 | A |
5625678 | Blomfield-Brown | Apr 1997 | A |
5625825 | Rostoker et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5634015 | Chang et al. | May 1997 | A |
5636371 | Yu | Jun 1997 | A |
5640394 | Schrier et al. | Jun 1997 | A |
5650941 | Coelho et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5663951 | Danneels et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5664162 | Dye | Sep 1997 | A |
5666362 | Chen et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5675507 | Bobo, II | Oct 1997 | A |
5678060 | Yokoyama et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
5680605 | Torres | Oct 1997 | A |
5687314 | Osman et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
5696899 | Kalwitz | Dec 1997 | A |
5699350 | Kraslavsky | Dec 1997 | A |
5701316 | Alferness et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5726769 | Imai et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5727149 | Hirata et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5734852 | Zias et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5734865 | Yu | Mar 1998 | A |
5748905 | Hauser et al. | May 1998 | A |
5754540 | Liu et al. | May 1998 | A |
5754556 | Ramseyer et al. | May 1998 | A |
5761281 | Baum et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5778178 | Arunachalam | Jul 1998 | A |
5790546 | Dobbins et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5790676 | Ganesan et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5802278 | Isfeld et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5802287 | Rostoker et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5802306 | Hunt | Sep 1998 | A |
5805816 | Picazo, Jr. et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5809235 | Sharma et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5815516 | Aaker et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5818935 | Maa | Oct 1998 | A |
5826032 | Finn et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5847698 | Reavey et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5854750 | Phillips et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5870549 | Bobo, II | Feb 1999 | A |
5870622 | Gulick et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5872919 | Wakeland | Feb 1999 | A |
5877764 | Feitelson et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5894557 | Bade et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
5901287 | Bull et al. | May 1999 | A |
5905582 | Hirai et al. | May 1999 | A |
5909546 | Osborne | Jun 1999 | A |
5918051 | Savitzky et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5920732 | Riddle | Jul 1999 | A |
5923892 | Levy | Jul 1999 | A |
5935268 | Weaver | Aug 1999 | A |
5937169 | Connery et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5941988 | Bhagwat et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5943481 | Wakeland | Aug 1999 | A |
5946487 | Dangelo | Aug 1999 | A |
5966534 | Cooke et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5968161 | Southgate | Oct 1999 | A |
5974518 | Nogradi | Oct 1999 | A |
5987582 | Devic | Nov 1999 | A |
5991299 | Radogna et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5999974 | Ratcliff et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6012961 | Sharpe et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6014699 | Ratcliff et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6034963 | Minami et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6038595 | Ortony | Mar 2000 | A |
6046980 | Packer | Apr 2000 | A |
6049857 | Watkins | Apr 2000 | A |
6058421 | Fijolek et al. | May 2000 | A |
6061368 | Hitzelberger | May 2000 | A |
6061742 | Stewart et al. | May 2000 | A |
6076115 | Sambamurthy et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6078736 | Guccione | Jun 2000 | A |
6081846 | Hyder et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6092110 | Maria et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6092229 | Boyle et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6094657 | Hailpern et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6098188 | Kalmanek, Jr. et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6101543 | Alden et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6151625 | Swales et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6157955 | Narad et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6157956 | Jensen et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6172980 | Flanders et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6172990 | Deb et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6173333 | Jolitz et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6182228 | Boden et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6185619 | Joffe et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6208651 | Van Renesse et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6226680 | Boucher et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6230193 | Arunkumar et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6233626 | Swales et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6247060 | Boucher et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6247068 | Kyle | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6290565 | Galyean III et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6290566 | Gabai et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6319010 | Kikinis | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6327625 | Wang et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6330659 | Poff et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6331865 | Sachs et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6334153 | Boucher et al. | Dec 2001 | B2 |
6341129 | Schroeder et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6345301 | Burns et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6347347 | Brown et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6363418 | Conboy et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6377570 | Vaziri et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6389479 | Boucher et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6389537 | Davis et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6393487 | Boucher et al. | May 2002 | B2 |
6397316 | Fesas, Jr. | May 2002 | B2 |
6427169 | Elzur | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6427171 | Craft et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6427173 | Boucher et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6430628 | Connor | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6434620 | Boucher et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6446192 | Narasimhan et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6460080 | Shah et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6470415 | Starr et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6480852 | Himmel et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6510458 | Berstis et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6519247 | Yoshida | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6530061 | Labatte | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6567855 | Tubbs et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6572431 | Maa | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6591302 | Boucher et al. | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6609225 | Ng | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6625147 | Yokoyama et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6629141 | Elzur et al. | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6658480 | Boucher et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6687758 | Craft et al. | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6697868 | Craft et al. | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6713201 | Bullock et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6751665 | Philbrick et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6757746 | Boucher et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6765901 | Johnson et al. | Jul 2004 | B1 |
6773344 | Gabai et al. | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6800013 | Liu | Oct 2004 | B2 |
6807581 | Starr et al. | Oct 2004 | B1 |
6826615 | Barrall et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6938092 | Burns | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6941386 | Craft et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6949002 | Yamaguchi et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6965941 | Boucher et al. | Nov 2005 | B2 |
6980559 | Kichise | Dec 2005 | B2 |
6983357 | Poff et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
6996070 | Starr et al. | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7039717 | Johnson | May 2006 | B2 |
7165112 | Battin et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7167927 | Philbrick et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
RE39501 | Minami et al. | Mar 2007 | E |
7302499 | Johnson | Nov 2007 | B2 |
7330918 | Yamamoto et al. | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7483375 | Johnson et al. | Jan 2009 | B2 |
7535913 | Minami et al. | May 2009 | B2 |
7587470 | Johnson | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7996568 | Johnson et al. | Aug 2011 | B2 |
20010011233 | Narayanaswami | Aug 2001 | A1 |
20010021949 | Blightman et al. | Sep 2001 | A1 |
20010023460 | Boucher et al. | Sep 2001 | A1 |
20010027496 | Boucher et al. | Oct 2001 | A1 |
20010030958 | Kichise | Oct 2001 | A1 |
20010036196 | Blightman et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20010037397 | Boucher et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20010037406 | Philbrick et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20010047433 | Boucher et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20020055993 | Shah et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20020085562 | Hufferd et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020087732 | Boucher et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020091831 | Johnson | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020091844 | Craft et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020095519 | Philbrick et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020120899 | Gahan et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020147839 | Boucher et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020156927 | Boucher et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020161919 | Boucher et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020163888 | Grinfeld | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020188839 | Noehring et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030005142 | Elzur et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030005143 | Elzur et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030014544 | Pettey | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030016669 | Pfister et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030031172 | Grinfeld | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030046330 | Hayes | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030046418 | Raval et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030056009 | Mizrachi et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030058870 | Mizrachi et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030061505 | Sperry et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030066011 | Oren | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030079033 | Craft et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030081599 | Wu et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030084185 | Pinkerton | May 2003 | A1 |
20030095567 | Lo et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030115350 | Uzrad-Nali et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030115417 | Corrigan | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030128704 | Mizrachi et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030140124 | Burns | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030145101 | Mitchell et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030145270 | Holt | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030165160 | Minami et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030167346 | Craft et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030200284 | Philbrick et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20040003126 | Boucher et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040054813 | Boucher et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040062246 | Boucher et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040062267 | Minami et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040064578 | Boucher et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040064589 | Boucher et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040064590 | Starr et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040073703 | Boucher et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040078462 | Philbrick et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040088262 | Boucher et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040100952 | Boucher et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040111535 | Boucher et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040117509 | Craft et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040158640 | Philbrick et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040158793 | Blightman et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040190512 | Schultz | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040213290 | Johnson et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040240435 | Boucher et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050117582 | Biran et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050122986 | Starr et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050141561 | Craft et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050160139 | Boucher et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050175003 | Craft et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050182841 | Sharp | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050198198 | Craft et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050204058 | Philbrick et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050223110 | Honary et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050226144 | Okita | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050249245 | Hazani et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050271042 | Johnson | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050278459 | Boucher et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060010238 | Craft et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060031818 | Poff et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060168281 | Starr et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20070030861 | Johnson et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070044002 | Johnson et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070055967 | Poff et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070058534 | Shimonishi et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070062245 | Fuller et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070253430 | Minami et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20080034103 | Johnson | Feb 2008 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
11196187 | Feb 1998 | JP |
11313091 | Nov 1999 | JP |
2000196669 | Jul 2000 | JP |
447205 | Jul 2001 | TW |
448407 | Aug 2001 | TW |
WO 9808344 | Feb 1998 | WO |
WO 9821655 | May 1998 | WO |
WO 9808344 | Jul 1999 | WO |
9939488 | Aug 1999 | WO |
WO 9939488 | Aug 1999 | WO |
9965219 | Dec 1999 | WO |
01013583 | Feb 2001 | WO |
WO 0113583 | Feb 2001 | WO |
WO 02059757 | Aug 2002 | WO |
WO 02086674 | Oct 2002 | WO |
WO 03021443 | Mar 2003 | WO |
WO 03021447 | Mar 2003 | WO |
WO 03021452 | Mar 2003 | WO |