Patent Application
20170259946
None.
No government rights: the owner/inventor received no government funding or in-kind government support during the process of conceiving this invention.
A portion of the disclosure of this patent document contains material that is subject to copyright protection. The owner has no objection to the facsimile reproduction by anyone of the patent document or the patent disclosure, as it appears in the Patent and Trademark Office patent file or records, but otherwise reserves all copyrights whatsoever.
1. Field of the Invention
The present invention relates generally to human-crewed spacecraft, and more specifically to a modular interplanetary spacecraft that is assembled in space, and includes the use of asteroidal materials for radiation shielding.
2. Description of the Prior Art
The concept of inflatable space structures has been studied and developed over a period of many years. Early inflatable space structure concepts include U.S. Pat. No. 6,439,508 to Taylor, and U.S. Pat. No. 5,086,999 to Mullen. NASA personnel subsequently patented the inflatable Transhab concept in U.S. Pat. No. 6,231,010 to Schneider, and U.S. Pat. No. 6,547,189 to Raboin.
NASA later licensed the Transhab technologies to Bigelow Aerospace. Company founder Robert Bigelow added to the NASA designs in U.S. Pat. Nos. 6,899,301, 6,962,310, 8,366,051, 8,578,663, and 9,327,848. Another NASA patent, U.S. Pat. No. 7,509,774, details a method for incorporating portholes in the inflatable spacecraft without compromising structural integrity.
In recent years, Bigelow Aerospace has demonstrated expandable space structures with soft-shell exteriors made of generally pliable and flexible material (note that Bigelow Aerospace now refers to its modules as “expandable” rather than “inflatable)”. These structures do not require human assembly; they launch collapsed and expand after they reach orbit. Two separately-launched Bigelow expandable modules are currently in low-Earth orbit that did not require human assembly after launch—Genesis I and Genesis II.
The Bigelow Expandable Activity Module (“BEAM”) is an experimental expandable space station module developed by Bigelow Aerospace, under contract to NASA, for testing as a temporary module on the International Space Station (“ISS”) from 2016 to 2018. The BEAM module arrived at the ISS on Apr. 10, 2016, was berthed to the station on April 16, and was expanded and pressurized on May 28, 2016. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bigelow_Expandable_Activity_Module accessed May 24, 2017.
U.S. Pat. No. 7,469,864 to Bigelow describes a method of assembling a habitable structure comprised of a plurality of expandable structures, connecting nodes, busses, and landing pads that are assembled in orbit, and subsequently landed on the surface of an extraterrestrial mass such as the Moon. This structure can be assembled robotically.
Charles Bombardier of Imaginactive, a Canadian nonprofit organization, has publicly disclosed a spacecraft that is comprised of expandable Bigelow modules mated together. The artist's conception of the spacecraft includes one robotic arm, although the use for that robotic arm has not been publicly disclosed. Mr. Bombardier's spacecraft concept, as publicly disclosed, does not include use of asteroidal materials for radiation shielding, and does not contemplate the separation and reconnection of spacecraft modular elements as part of spacecraft mission operations. http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-4152650/Radical-spacecraft-concept-ferry-people-MOON.html accessed May 24, 2017.
Bigelow Aerospace is in the process of developing the B330 module, which is substantially larger than Genesis II. Each Bigelow B330 habitation module includes life support systems and thermal system radiators. http://bigelowaerospace.com/b330/accessed May 24, 2017
The Bigelow Aerospace website says that “The [Bigelow B330] module provides radiation protection equivalent to or better than existing International Space Station modules” http://bigelowaerospace.com/b330/ accessed May 24, 2017. Such protection, however, will not be adequate in the much harsher radiation environment that lies outside of the Earth's magnetosphere.
On long-duration interplanetary missions, much more robust radiation shielding will be required in order to avoid excessively adverse health consequences to the crew. A recent article in the journal Scientific Reports sets forth a NASA rodent study's finding “that the radiation [equivalent to a six-month one-way trip to Mars] caused significant long-term brain damage, including cognitive impairments and dementia, a result of brain inflammation and damage to the rodents' neurons” On a Long Trip to Mars, Cosmic Radiation May Damage Astronauts' Brains, http://www.livescience.com/56449-cosmic-radiation-may-damage-brains.html accessed May 24, 2017; Risk of Acute and Late Central Nervous System Effects from Radiation Exposure https://humanresearchroadmap.nasa.gov/evidence/reports/CNS.pdf accessed May 24, 2017. Thus, a mission to Mars utilizing current shielding methods would result in long-term brain and central nervous system damage that would adversely affect the crew's ability to make decisions, thereby threatening the safety and success of the mission.
An earlier study in Scientific Reports found that “Astronauts who never flew, or who flew in low-Earth orbit, had much lower rates of death from heart disease than the Apollo astronauts.” The study concluded “These data suggest that human travel into deep space may be more hazardous to cardiovascular health than previously estimated” Space Radiation Took a Toll on Apollo Astronauts, Study Says http://www.foxnews.com/science/2016/07/29/space-radiation-took-toll-on-apollo-astronauts-study-says.html; Risk of Cardiovascular Disease and Other Degenerative Tissue Effects from Radiation Exposure https://humanresearchroadmap.nasa.gov/evidence/reports/Degen.pdf accessed May 24, 2017.
The Wikipedia entry “Spaceflight Radiation Carcinogenesis” (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spaceflight_radiation_carcinogenesis accessed May 24, 2017) summarizes other studies over a long period of time that have documented higher rates of cancer among astronauts who travel in deep space.
https://humanresearchroadmap.nasa.gov/evidence/reports/Cancer.pdf accessed May 24, 2017_(emphasis added).
In a press release dated Jun. 5, 2017, the University of Nevada Las Vegas announced that “The cancer risk for a human mission to Mars has effectively doubled following a UNLV study predicting a dramatic increase in the disease for astronauts traveling to the red planet or on long-term missions outside the protection of Earth's magnetic field. The findings appeared in the May issue of Scientific Reports and were presented by UNLV scientist Francis Cucinotta, a leading scholar on radiation and space physics.
. . . Exploring Mars will require missions of 900 days or longer and includes more than one year in deep space where exposures to all energies of galactic cosmic ray heavy ions are unavoidable,” Cucinotta explained. “Current levels of radiation shielding would at best, modestly decrease the exposure risks.
. . . Galactic cosmic ray exposure can devastate a cell's nucleus and cause mutations that can result in cancers,” Cucinotta explained. “We learned the damaged cells send signals to the surrounding, unaffected cells and likely modify the tissues' microenvironments. Those signals seem to inspire the healthy cells to mutate, thereby causing additional tumors or cancers.” https://www.unlv.edu/news/release/study-significant-collateral-damage-cosmic-rays-increases-cancer-risks-mars-astronauts accessed Jun. 25, 2017 (emphasis added).
Another risk posed by an interplanetary mission is the possibility of a meteoroid impact that would damage the spacecraft. https://www.nasa.gov/feature/goddard/2017/camera-on-nasas-lunar-orbiter-survived-2014-meteoroid-hit accessed May 28, 2017. The probability of such an impact is higher on long-term interplanetary missions.
“The utilization of natural resources from asteroids is an idea that is older than the Space Age. The technologies are now available to transform this endeavor from an idea into reality. The [NASA] Asteroid Redirect Mission (ARM) is a mission concept which includes the goal of robotically returning a small Near-Earth Asteroid (NEA) or a multi-ton boulder from a large NEA to cislunar space in the mid-2020s using an advanced Solar Electric Propulsion (SEP) vehicle and currently available technologies. The paradigm shift enabled by the ARM concept would allow in-situ resource utilization (ISRU) to be used at the human [deep-space] mission departure location (i.e., cislunar space) versus exclusively at the deep-space mission destination. This approach drastically reduces the barriers associated with utilizing ISRU for human deep-space missions.” Asteroid Redirect Mission concept: A Bold Approach for Utilizing Space Resources http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0094576515002635 accessed May 24, 2017. As of the date this application is submitted, NASA does not plan on proceeding with the Asteroid Redirect Mission. Nonetheless, commercial development of the capability to capture and maneuver asteroids, and to process materials from an asteroid in situ are very desirable and useful capabilities that the United States should encourage.
The company Made in Space received a 2016 Phase I NASA Innovative Advanced Concepts (NIAC) award for Project RAMA, a proposal to mine asteroids and use additive manufacturing to create spacecraft systems from the asteroidal materials. This proposal would use the asteroid as an autonomous spacecraft. It does not mention any human crews, does not include any spacecraft elements launched from Earth, and is not modular. Made In Space says the technology and infrastructure could be in place in 20-30 years. https://www.nasa.gov/feature/reconstituting-asteroids-into-mechanical-automata
The idea of using a hollowed-out asteroid as a spacecraft has appeared in a number of science fiction novels, including, among others, Eon by Greg Bear and Rite of Passage by Alexei Panshin. However, these fictional spacecraft are city-sized, and the bodies of the spacecraft are solely comprised of an asteroid, rather than incorporating an asteroid into a vehicle comprised of other elements in addition to the asteroid. Also, asteroids were not used in these stories for the specific purpose of providing radiation shielding. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Asteroids_in_fiction; https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eon_(novel); https://web.archive.ora/web/20070929123231/http://www.adherents.com/lit/bk_Pans_RiteOfPassage.html accessed May 24, 2017.
No prior patents or patent applications known to the inventor propose the use of a hollowed-out asteroid and pulverized asteroidal materials as a method of radiation and meteoroid shielding that is incorporated into a spacecraft to protect human occupants.
U.S. Pat. No. 8,210,481 to Kinstler describes a magnetic field generator composed of superconducting material that can shield a spacecraft and its human occupants from radiation. This concept also includes shielding to protect electronic components from the magnetic field. U.S. Pat. No. 8,550,406 to Bigelow describes a similar magnetic shield. The Technology Readiness Level of these concepts is unknown. The amount of power required to generate these magnetic fields, and the effectiveness of their shielding are also unknown. This shielding method would not provide protection from meteoroid impacts.
The ISS is a structure in low-Earth orbit that is comprised of a plurality of human-inhabited modules and other structures (e.g. https://www.nasa.gov/pdf/179225main_ISS_Poster_Back.pdf accessed May 24, 2017) that include, among other things, solar arrays, thermal radiators, an ammonia cooling system, docking nodes, an Integrated Truss Structure (https://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/station/structure/elements/its.html#.WERkdKL_rhY, accessed May 24, 2017), the Space Station Remote Manipulator System (SSRMS) known as Canadarm2 (U.S. Pat. No. 4,585,388 to Gossain) (https://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/station/structure/elements/mss.html accessed May 24, 2017), the Mobile Transporter Cart (U.S. Pat. No. 4,757,767 to Wesselski), which hosts the Mobile Remote Servicer Base System (MBS) (U.S. Pat. No. 4,685,535 to Bush), and the Special Purpose Dexterous Manipulator (SPDM, also known as Dextre) (e.g. http://robotics.estec.esa.int/i-SAIRAS/isairas1999/s02-02.pdf accessed May 24, 2017).
The SSRMS can move along rails on the Integrated Truss Structure on top of the US—provided Mobile Transporter cart, which hosts the MRS Base System. Both ends of the SSRMS arm can attach to power/video/data “grapple fixtures” that are located at various points on the ISS trusses (U.S. Pat. No. 4,929,011 to Vandersluis). Unpowered “Flight-Releasable Grapple Fixtures” (FRGFs) can be attached to payloads that will be delivered to the ISS, so that they can be captured and maneuvered by the SSRMS when the payload arrives at the station. The following video illustrates the operation of the SSRMS and Dextre utilizing grapple fixtures: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v-qF9IysSGg2U accessed May 24, 2017.
In 2011, Boeing's Deputy ISS Manager, Michael Raftery, proposed using the ISS as “a testbed for new technology, as an analog for interplanetary vehicles, or as a ‘base camp’ for exploratory vehicles.” “This base camp would effectively be a detached module of the ISS which would either be built in LEO and transferred to an Earth-Moon libration point, or launched directly to that destination and assembled there.” (http://www.aiaahouston.org/Horizons/Page17_Horizons_2011_11_and_12.jpg accessed May 24, 2017). This concept does not include the incorporation of expandable modules in a human-transportation spacecraft, does not include the use of a hollowed-out asteroid or other asteroidal materials as radiation and meteoroid shielding, and does not propose a modular spacecraft that is designed for mechanical detachment and re-assembly of modules, utilizing robotic arms such as those used on the ISS. This proposal does not discuss the materials service-life of repurposed ISS components that have been exposed to space radiation for extended periods of time.
U.S. Pat. No. 7,780,119 to Johnson describes a modular spacecraft that would utilize technologies from a Centaur upper stage. This concept does not include the incorporation of expandable modules in a human-transportation spacecraft, does not include the use of a hollowed-out asteroid or other asteroidal materials as radiation and meteoroid shielding, and does not propose a modular spacecraft that is designed for mechanical detachment and re-assembly of modules, utilizing robotic arms such as those used on the ISS.
U.S. Pat. No. 7,374,134 to Collyer describes methods for electro-welding modular elements of a spacecraft, and for de-bonding the module welds at a later time. This concept does not include the incorporation of expandable modules in a human-transportation spacecraft, does not include the use of a hollowed-out asteroid or other asteroidal materials as radiation and meteoroid shielding, and does not propose a modular spacecraft that is designed for mechanical detachment and re-assembly of modules, utilizing robotic arms such as those used on the ISS.
In 2016, Shen Ge and Yvonne Vigue-Rodi proposed that U.S. elements of the ISS be disassembled from the ISS when the United States government ceases operations. These ISS elements would then be transported to lunar orbit or one of the Earth-Moon Lagrangian points, for assembly and re-use as a lunar space station. http://www.aiaahouston.org/Horizons/B-2.3_repurposingISS.pdf accessed May 24, 2017. This proposal does not mention the incorporation of expandable modules in a human-transportation spacecraft, does not include the use of a hollowed-out asteroid or other asteroidal materials as radiation and meteoroid shielding, and does not propose a modular spacecraft that is designed for mechanical detachment and re-assembly of modules utilizing robotic arms such as those used on the ISS. This proposal does not discuss the materials service-life of repurposed ISS components that have been exposed to space radiation for extended periods of time.
In 2016 Lockheed Martin first presented its “Mars Base Camp” concept. http://www.spacepolicyonline.com/news/lockheed-martin-to-propose-2028-orbiting-mars-base-camp-today accessed May 24, 2017. This spacecraft is modular, with some elements assembled in cis-lunar space, and a solar electric propulsion-powered laboratory module launched into Mars orbit prior to departure of the larger human-crewed spacecraft. The Mars Base Camp spacecraft would be comprised of two Orion capsules, a crew quarters module surrounded by liquid oxygen and liquid hydrogen tanks which would provide additional radiation shielding and propulsion fuel, a habitat module, a laboratory module, radiators, solar arrays, and a cryostage propulsion module. The solar electric propulsion-powered lab module would dock with the Mars Base Camp spacecraft when it arrives in Mars orbit. All elements of the spacecraft (except perhaps the solar electric propulsion-powered lab) would be launched from Earth utilizing NASA's Space Launch System. (http://www.lockheedmartin.com/us/ssc/mars-orion.html) This concept does not include expandable modules, does not include the use of a hollowed-out asteroid or other asteroidal materials as radiation and meteoroid shielding, does not include robotic arms, and is not designed for detachment and re-assembly of modules utilizing the robotic arms. This concept would also not leave a space station in Mars orbit, and would not have the capability of landing humans on the surface of Mars.
NASA has funded at least one study of cryogenic deep sleep, and this technology would be very valuable for a Mars mission. It would reduce the amount of food, water, oxygen, and other supplies consumed by the crew, and thereby reduce the mass of the spacecraft's cargo. On long distance missions, hibernating the crew during the trips to and from the destination would avoid any concerns about the psychological effects of being confined in a relatively small space with other people for an extended period of time. https://vanwinkles.com/latest-science-of-cryogenic-sleep-human-hibemation-for-space-travel
U.S. Pat. No. 9,567,116 to Bigelow describes a “Docking Node Transporter Tug” that can be remote-controlled wirelessly. The docking tug can dock with a Bigelow habitation module and then transport the module to a desired location utilizing the docking tug's propulsion systems. The docking tug has docking assemblies at both ends, so it can be docked with two Bigelow expandable habitation modules simultaneously. The docking tug is hollow, so the docking tug can serve as a node that humans can traverse to move from one expandable habitation module to the next. This Docking Node Transporter Tug does not include an airlock, and does not have any docking assemblies on the side of the docking tug that could accommodate celestial-body landing craft or space capsules such as the Orion capsule that NASA and Lockheed Martin are currently developing and testing.
The International Docking Adapter (IDA) is a spacecraft docking system adapter that NASA and Boeing developed to convert APAS-95 to the NASA Docking System (NDS)/International Docking System Standard (IDSS). APAS-95 was developed and manufactured by Russian company RKK Energiya to join the American and Russia modules on the International Space Station (ISS), and it allowed the Space Shuttle to dock. The IDA was designed to be placed on each of the International Space Station's two open Pressurized Mating Adapters (PMA), both of which will be connected to Node-2 (Harmony module). IDA-2 was launched on SpX CRS-9 on 18 Jul. 2016. It was attached and connected to PMA-2 during a spacewalk on 19 Aug. 2016. IDA-3 is scheduled to be launched on the Dragon CRS-16 mission during summer 2018. Meet the International Docking Adapter, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/International_Docking_Adapter and Androgynous Peripheral Attach System [APAS]. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Androgynous_Peripheral_Attach_System#APAS-95 (both articles accessed Jun. 8, 2017).
It is the intention of this inventor to provide an interplanetary, human-crewed spacecraft that includes and builds upon existing United States civil and commercial space technologies, including without limitation expandable habitation modules, ISS technologies, and propulsion technologies. This spacecraft is comprised of a hollowed-out asteroid and other asteroidal materials, five expandable habitation modules, other spacecraft elements based upon ISS technologies, and a propulsion module that will utilize the propulsion technologies that are most appropriate for the spacecraft's missions. These propulsion methods may include, without limitation, liquid hydrogen/liquid oxygen chemical propulsion, solar-electric propulsion, beamed energy, and solid-fuel rocket boosters that are jettisoned after firing.
The primary object of the present invention is to provide radiation shielding that is far more effective than other human spacecraft designs, for the purpose of protecting crew and passengers from the adverse health consequences of extended missions in harsh, deep-space and planetary radiation environments. The spacecraft utilizes a hollowed-out asteroid with exterior walls at least 2 meters thick. An expandable control module is then expanded inside the asteroid, to achieve a very high degree of radiation shielding in the control module during the journey to and from the mission destination. Channeled curtains containing pulverized asteroidal material are affixed to the trusses on each of the four sides of the spacecraft to provide radiation shielding for the expandable modules aft of the control module.
Another object of the present invention is to provide a modular spacecraft that can provide protection from meteoroid impacts. The asteroid and the channeled shielding curtains provide this protection.
Another object of the present invention is to provide a modular spacecraft that can be assembled relatively quickly. Astronaut crews will assemble the spacecraft at Earth-Moon Lagrangian point L4 or L5 (the “Staging and Assembly Area”). If a transporter tug is used to assist in docking the expandable modules, this will increase the speed of assembly.
Another object of the present invention is to provide a modular spacecraft with much lower research and development, manufacturing, and assembly costs than other interplanetary spacecraft designs. The expandable habitation modules and ISS technologies utilized in this spacecraft are proven technologies that will require little further research and development to incorporate into the spacecraft. Voluminous data is available regarding assembly and operation of these systems.
Another object of the present invention is to provide a spacecraft that is safer for astronauts, because autonomy, teleoperation, and robotic technologies can greatly reduce the number of human extravehicular activities (EVAs) that will be required to assemble and maintain the spacecraft.
Another object of the present invention is to provide a spacecraft that has unique capabilities never offered by any other interplanetary spacecraft design. After the crew and passengers complete work at their destination, the two robotic arms running on rails along the spacecraft's truss structure will grapple and detach the asteroid-enclosed control module, the forward docking and airlock node, and the propulsion module. The robotic arms will then mate the asteroid-enclosed control module, the docking and airlock node, and the propulsion module to form a Crew-Return Vehicle, as illustrated in
Detachment and mating of the Crew-Return Vehicle will leave a space station in orbit at the mission destination comprised of modules #2 through #5, structural support members, trusses, a docking and airlock node, the secondary computer network, solar arrays, two Mobile Transporter Carts, and the attached Mobile Remote Servicer Base Systems (MBS), two robotic arms, two dexterous end-effectors that can be attached to the ends of the robotic arms, and two landing craft, as illustrated in
The crew and any passengers will return to the Staging and Assembly area in the Crew-Return Vehicle. The Crew-Return Vehicle will dock with a space capsule at the Staging and Assembly area, and the crew and passengers will return to the Earth's surface in this capsule. The Crew-Return Vehicle will remain at the Staging and Assembly area, and can be used in future missions.
The American Heritage Science Dictionary defines “Lagrangian Point” as “A point in space where a small body with negligible mass under the gravitational influence of two large bodies will remain at rest relative to the larger ones. In a system consisting of two large bodies (such as the Sun-Earth system or the Moon-Earth system), there are five Lagrangian points (L1 through L5). Knowledge of these points is useful in deciding where to position orbiting bodies” (http://www.dictionary.com/browse/Lagrangian-point accessed May 24, 2017).
Pursuant to a prize competition or contract, a commercial space-mining company or other organization will hollow-out an asteroid with walls a minimum of 2 meters thick 4, and will transport the hollowed-out asteroid 4 to the Staging and Assembly area.
Launch vehicles will transport five expandable habitation modules 1 from the surface of the Earth to the Staging and Assembly area, with a mounting plate 5 and a sealing plate 2 attached to module #1, as shown in
The expandable module operator will maneuver Module #1 and the attached mounting plate 5 and sealing plate 2 so that the expandable module is beside the asteroid. The spacecraft assembly crew will remove the mounting plate 5 from module #1, and securely attach the mounting plate 5 to the inside of the hollow asteroid 4, as shown in
The expandable module operator will then maneuver unexpanded module #1 so that it is firmly seated inside the mounting plate 5, and the sealing plate 2 is lined up so that the truss beams 3 can pass through the holes in the sealing plate 2. The assembly crew will then pass the trusses 3 through the sealing plate 2, and attach the sealing plate 2 so that it is flush with the outside of the asteroid, as shown in
The spacecraft assembly crew will then dock and mate the forward docking and airlock node 17 to module #1, and attach the trusses that pass through the sealing plate 2 to the docking and airlock node 17, as shown in
The expandable module operator will maneuver or initiate maneuver of modules #2 through #4, one at a time, so that module #2 docks and mates with the forward docking and airlock node 17, module #3 docks and mates with module #2, and module #4 docks and mates with module #3, as shown in
The spacecraft assembly crew will then dock and mate the aft docking and airlock node 17 with module #4, and maneuver module #5 so that it docks and mates with the aft docking and airlock node 17, as shown in
The expandable module operator will then pressurize each module, beginning with the control module, and then sequentially pressurizing modules #2 through #5.
Launch vehicles will transport to the Staging and Assembly area trusses 3, sensors 6, imaging cameras 7, communications equipment 8, attitude control thrusters 9, secondary solar arrays 11, spherical storage tanks 20, and components of the primary computer network 23 and secondary computer network 24.
As shown in
The spacecraft assembly crew will then attach trusses 3 to the deployed structural support members 12 on modules #2 through #5, as shown on
The assembly crew will then attach the secondary solar arrays 11 to the lower trusses in the asteroid truss superstructure, as shown in
The assembly crew will then attach and install sensors 6, communications equipment 8, imaging cameras 7, attitude control thrusters 9, and spherical storage tanks 20.
A launch vehicle will transport the primary solar arrays 16 to the Assembly and Staging Area.
The assembly crew will then attach the primary solar arrays 16 to the lower trusses 3 adjacent to the junction of habitation modules #3 and #4, as shown in
A launch vehicle will transport the propulsion module 19 and propulsion mounting plate 21, as shown in
The spacecraft assembly crew will then maneuver the propulsion module 19 and propulsion mounting plate 21 so that the four trusses 3 attached to the module #5 structural support members 12 pass through the openings in the propulsion mounting plate 21. The assembly crew will then attach the four trusses 3 to the sides of the propulsion module 19, as shown in
The assembly crew will then install primary computer network 23 in the control module, and the secondary computer network 24 in Module #3. They will then install various software packages, wire the various systems together, power all of the systems, and test them. Each of the computer networks will be capable of controlling all of the spacecraft's systems, providing redundancy until the modules are separated during the process of docking and mating the elements of the Crew Return Vehicle. Thereafter, the primary computer network will control the Crew Return Vehicle, and the secondary computer network will control the remaining modules that remain in the destination orbit.
One or more launch vehicles will transport scientific equipment, experiments, food, water, and other supplies to the Staging and Assembly area.
The assembly crew will then load the equipment, experiments, and supplies into modules #1 through #5.
Finally, the spacecraft assembly crew will fuel the spacecraft. If chemical propulsion is used, liquid hydrogen and oxygen may be purchased from a commercial space mining and processing company, or purchased from the operator of a fuel depot at the Staging and Assembly area. The interplanetary spacecraft is now ready to embark upon a historic journey.
The assembled spacecraft can be used to safely transport humans from Earth-Moon Lagrangian points L4 or L5 to deep-space destinations such as the Moon and Mars. During the flight through deep space, the crew and passengers will primarily inhabit the expandable control module #1 inside the asteroid 4, for maximum radiation protection.
Upon arrival at their destination, the crew and passengers can utilize the lander spacecraft 15 docked to the aft docking node 17 for short-term trips to neighboring celestial bodies, which might include the Moon, Phobos, Deimos, and/or Mars.
Owner/operators of the interplanetary spacecraft may offer a prize for, or execute a contract with a commercial space mining company or other organization to deliver an ice-bearing asteroid with attached in situ resource utilization (ISRU) equipment to the interplanetary spacecraft's destination orbit, prior to arrival of the interplanetary spacecraft. Either during transport from cislunar space, or at the destination orbit, the ISRU equipment can remove water from the asteroid and break it up into hydrogen and oxygen for use as rocket fuel for the Crew-Return Vehicle. In the alternative, the commercial mining company or other organization could mine and process the water at the asteroid's original location, and then deliver tanks of hydrogen and oxygen to the interplanetary spacecraft's destination orbit.
Upon completion of their work at the destination orbit, as shown in
After mating the Crew-Return Vehicle modules, the crew will refuel the propulsion module, if the module includes chemical propulsion. The crew will then return to the Staging and Assembly area in the Crew-Return Vehicle.
A space capsule launched from Earth will rendezvous and dock with the crew-return vehicle at the Staging and Assembly area. The crew will then return to the Earth's surface in the capsule. The crew-return vehicle will remain at the Staging and Assembly area for use in future missions.
Thus it will be appreciated by those skilled in the art that the present invention is not restricted to the particular best mode embodiments described with reference to the drawings, and that variations may be made therein without departing from the scope of the present invention as defined in the appended claims and equivalents thereof.
