1. Field of Invention
This invention is in the field of Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR) imaging where some of the pulses making up the image are missing.
2. Description of the Related Art
Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR) radar is used for ground mapping as well as target identification. The general principle behind SAR is to coherently combine the amplitude and phase information of radar returns from a plurality of sequentially transmitted pulses from a relatively small antenna on a moving platform for a high resolution image.
The plurality of returns creating a SAR image generated by the transmitted pulses along a known path of the platform make up a frame length. During the frame length, amplitude as well as phase information returned from each of the pulses, for each of many range bins, is preserved. The SAR image is formed from the coherent combination of the amplitude and phase of return(s) within each range bin, motion compensated for spatial displacement of the moving platform during the acquisition of the returns for the duration of the frame length (aperture).
The plurality of pulses transmitted during an SAR frame length, when coherently combined and processed, result in image quality comparable to a longer antenna, corresponding approximately to the “length” traveled by the antenna during the frame length. The clarity of a SAR image is in many respects dependent on the quality of the motion compensation applied to each radar return prior to SAR image computation as well as on the existence of full information descriptive of the SAR image, i.e. a complete set of radar returns. The SAR process depends on the coherent, phase accurate summing of all radar returns expected within a frame. Missing pulses during the acquisition of the image introduce distortions over the whole SAR image, such as increased sidelobes, thereby reducing the SAR image clarity.
The Range Migration Algorithm (RMA), a popular way to focus the radar returns forming a SAR image, is derived assuming the radar returns arrive at a generally fixed, known rate, determined by the pulse repetition rate and/or the analog to digital conversion rate. If radar returns descriptive of the SAR image are not regular in their arrival, certain functions within the processing, such as FFTs, cannot function as expected and the image becomes blurred.
SAR images are improved by a method for acquiring a synthetic aperture image from a sequence of periodic pulse returns where the sequence of periodic pulse returns is interspersed with interrupts, i.e. missing pulses. The interrupts mark the start and end of one or more segments, where the segments contain the periodic pulse returns form the SAR image. The method comprises the steps of:
The computation for extrapolating the missing pulse returns is introduced after the Stolt interpolator in RMA processing.
In computing the model order, eigenvalues are found and compared to a threshold. Roots of a linear prediction polynomial are computed, then stabilized to obtain stabilized roots. Linear prediction coefficients are reconstituted using the stabilized roots.
Sub-bands are used to decrease computing time for the missing pulse returns.
In the Drawing:
The present invention describes a method for compensating for missing radar return information within a frame thus yielding clearer SAR images. The concepts herein are applicable for use with the Range Migration Algorithm (RMA) or any other convolution based algorithm for SAR image rendition from pulses collected in a periodic fashion.
The structure of the RMA is based on a convolution. Generally, it consists of a two dimensional Fourier transform, then a multiply operation, a change of variables to get to rectilinear coordinates, and finally an inverse Fourier transform. The present invention is applied after the Stolt interpolator.
Another alternative during SAR operation is “search” mode. Here, a strip of ground is covered by a moving platform generating a SAR image as it progresses along its path. Both types of SAR radar are well known in the art and, for example, are described by W. Carrara, et al, in Spotlight Synthetic Aperture Radar, Artech house, 1995, incorporated herein be reference in its entirety.
Motion compensation is the process of digital correction of radar phase error for each radar return in a SAR frame forming a SAR image due to the change in position of scatterers relative to the moving platform as it acquires radar returns. Motion compensation is performed in the airborne processor on each radar return. The exact form of motion compensation depends on the method used to compile the SAR image from the radar returns. This invention is compatible with the Range Migration Algorithm (RMA), a convolutional algorithm. RMA is preferred because it is better suited to many advanced image analysis techniques such as coherent change detection.
An assumption in RMA is that the nominal flight path of the moving platform (flying aircraft) during the SAR frame is in a straight line parallel to the centerline of the scene being acquired, where the scene is flat. The radar returns received depicting the scene are periodic, evenly spaced in time thus compatible with the functions (e.g. FFT) used in RMA. Aircraft ideal track is a straight line, the scene is flat, in a plane parallel to the flight track, as shown in
An along track Fourier transform 309 is now performed on the data, transposed and presented to along track matched filter 311. The digital stream generated from filter 311 is processed by a Stolt interpolator 313 for a change in variables. After Stolt interpolator 313, SAR image restoration 325 of this invention is performed, as further detailed in
An important aspect of this invention that distinguishes it from the RMA method is further detailed in
Providing Azimuth Deskew 321 is quite beneficial as it lines up the data (digital stream containing the SAR image) for subsequent processing in interrupt fill by linear prediction 323 (discussed below) as well as smoothing the noise present in the SAR image data. It is these twin benefits that allows the linear prediction below to work in this invention.
Interrupt fill by linear prediction 323 fills the voids left from interrupts. 1D IFFT Cross Track Inverse Fourier Transform extracts the SAR image from the resulting digital stream.
II. Modified Forward—Backward Linear Prediction (MFBLP) Method
Pulse interrupts in a SAR system can raise the sidelobe level in the SAR image by as much as 10 dB if not compensated. Thus they produce significant decrease in image quality. To correct this, the present method describes an approach for interpolating phase history in interrupted SAR case for the Range Migration Algorithm (RMA). It is applicable to both the spot and search modes. It is a canonical approach having two steps.
1. Phase history is processed and aligned in time after the Stolt interpolation 313 in
This modulation technique also reduces noise and makes the boundaries of the interrupts more clear.
2. A linear prediction type algorithm is applied to the range compressed phase histories to interpolate the missing slow-time data. This optimizes the signal processing to perform the interpolation. It is model based. The method estimates a model order for the number of scatterers in each range cell and applies the Modified Forward Backward Linear Prediction (MFBLP) technique to perform the gap fill for the missing pulses. Architecture for a fast implementation using a sub band filter approach is also described in
Rs is the distance from the antenna phase center to the reference line on the ground.
After motion compensation to the antenna path, the return from the scatterer can be modeled, for the search mode case as
Si(x,KR)=at
Where
at
Rx
R2B
g=azimuthal antenna pattern; g is 0 for x corresponding to pulse interrupt positions.
For the spot mode case the antenna pattern g depends on the scatterer position but is constant over the aperture.
SPOT Mode Analysis.
In SPOT mode, before performing Along Track Fourier Transform 309, scatterers are illuminated simultaneously by the antenna and thus interrupts are synchronous in time for all scatterers. However after Along Track Fourier transform 309 scatterers will appear shifted in spatial frequency Kz in proportion to their x-coordinate as shown in
Interrupts will also exhibit the same shift.
After the Stolt interpolation the return from a scatterer will be:
pi(KX, KY)=pulse interrupt modulation on the uninterrupted Stolt return.
To allow exploitation of the scatterer content of a return, the return is compressed with respect to KY (range) and aligned for the timing of the interrupts. For this, the return signal is shifted in proportion to the location of the scatterer in the X direction. This is done by applying a quadratic phase modulation to the complex image in the spatial domain. This is also known as Azimuth Deskew. A beneficial effect of applying Azimuth Deskew in this instance is that it cleanses the interrupted slow time signal shape.
Search Mode Analysis.
In search mode, as contrasted to spotlight mode, scatterers are illuminated at different times by the radar antenna, depending on their X coordinate location. Thus, interrupts appear on each scatterer response at times proportional to their X coordinate, however they are synchronous, i.e. they appear at the same time. After the along track FFT, the antenna patterns become aligned, however interrupt position has shifted in proportion to the scatterer X coordinate. This is solved by performing azimuth deskew after Stolt interpolation which makes the interrupt samples align in spatial frequency Kx. Now the scatterers are isolated in range cells and linear prediction interpolation is applied to interpolate across the interrupts.
Interrupt Fill Using Linear Prediction
After azimuth deskew, the response from a point scatterer resembles that of an interrupt pulse train, while before the interrupt it appears substantially degraded due to the processing, especially from the Along Track FFT and Stolt interpolation. Therefore, the azimuth deskew operation not only shifts in spatial operation in proportion to the X coordinate, but also filters some of the signal processing noise in the signal.
The linear prediction paradigm before it is applied needs to have a model order on the number of scatterers represented in the range compressed Kx samples. A model order on the number represented in the range compressed KX samples is found before the linear prediction paradigm is applied. As shown in
Samples
Note that {overscore (s)} are complex conjugates.
Next, the average segment covariance matrix R 517 is computed by:
Subsequently, the model order M0 of the scatterers in the data can be estimated using Compute Model Order 519. Here, the number of eigenvalues of R that are above a noise threshold are found. Once the model order M0 is computed, the MFBLP algorithm is applied to interpolate in between the available samples and thus fill the sample gaps due to interrupts. The MFBLP algorithm has been shown to produce accurate scatterer parameter extraction from radar returns even at moderate signal-to-noise ratios.
Using all the available sample segments as indicated in
Explicitly the data matrix A(k) and data vector {right arrow over (b)}(k) are expressed as:
K=0.75*N′
where
To compute S 523 consider
The MFBLP technique is used next to solve the equation:
A{right arrow over (α)}={right arrow over (b)}
or rather its equivalent form:
A*A{right arrow over (α)}=A*{right arrow over (b)}
In compute linear prediction coefficient 527 the solution for the linear prediction coefficients, as shown in
where {λm}, {{right arrow over (e)}m} are the eigenvalues and eigenvectors of A*A, and the notation A* means complex conjugate transpose.
Next, the corresponding linear prediction polynomial is formed and its roots extracted. The roots that are less than or equal to one in magnitude are kept. This insures that the forward data prediction to fill the interrupts is stable. If a root is larger than 1, its magnitude is forced to be 1.
Now, in Find Roots of Linear Prediction polynomial and stabilize roots/Re-constitute Linear Prediction coefficients 529, the linear prediction coefficients are reconstituted with the stable roots and gap fill is done by predicting forward.
Continuing, in Use Linear Prediction to Fill Gaps 531 the backwards linear prediction equations are used to predict backwards and fill interrupts in a similar fashion.
Here,
The linear prediction to fill gaps is
where
n=NK−{overscore (L)}, . . . ,Nk
k=1, . . . ,K
A weighted average of the backwards and forwards linear predictions may be used at an interrupt sample to increase its accuracy if the interrupt does not fall near either end of the samples. In general, the method herein interpolates well for information contained in missing pulses. When the number of samples in between interrupts is large (greater than 150), use a sub-band filtering technique which allows to process each sub-band separately and thus leads to a substantial decrease of the computational load of at least one order of magnitude. This approach is similar to the one shown in
In
An example is shown for 3 filters, filter 602 generating matrix Q1(k), filter 604 generating matrix QP(k), and filter 606 generating matrix QP(k).
For each filter in
All references cited in this document are incorporated herein in their entirety by reference.
Although presented in exemplary fashion employing specific embodiments, the disclosed structures are not intended to be so limited. For example, the concepts presented herein can also be applied in conjunction with the polar formatting algorithm used instead of the RMA algorithm in some cases.
Those skilled in the art will also appreciate that numerous changes and modifications could be made to the embodiment described herein without departing in any way from the invention.
This invention was made with Government support under Contract No. F19628-00-C-0100 awarded by the Department of the Air Force. The Government has certain rights in this invention.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4975704 | Gabriel et al. | Dec 1990 | A |
5243349 | Mims | Sep 1993 | A |
5383457 | Cohen | Jan 1995 | A |
5937102 | Jin | Aug 1999 | A |
6018306 | Serbin | Jan 2000 | A |
6492932 | Jin et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6661369 | Cho | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6670907 | Cho | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6781541 | Cho | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6795590 | Chen | Sep 2004 | B1 |
6873285 | Carrara et al. | Mar 2005 | B1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
59065274 | Apr 1984 | JP |
61050083 | Mar 1986 | JP |
61194379 | Aug 1986 | JP |