Intervertebral allograft spacer

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 6986788
  • Patent Number
    6,986,788
  • Date Filed
    Monday, April 9, 2001
    23 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, January 17, 2006
    18 years ago
Abstract
An allogenic intervertebral implant for fusing vertebrae is disclosed. The implant is a piece of allogenic bone conforming in size and shape with a portion of an end plate of a vertebra. The implant has a wedge-shaped profile to restore disc height and the natural curvature of the spine. The top and bottom surfaces of the implant have a plurality of teeth to resist expulsion and provide initial stability. The implant according to the present invention provides initial stability need for fusion without stress shielding.
Description
FIELD OF THE INVENTION

The present invention is directed to an allogenic implant and, more particularly, to an allogenic intervertebral implant.


BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

A number of medical conditions such as compression of spinal cord nerve roots, degenerative disc disease, and spondylolisthesis can cause severe low back pain. Intervertebral fusion is a surgical method of alleviating low back pain. In posterior lumbar interbody fusion (“PLIF”), two adjacent vertebral bodies are fused together by removing the affected disc and inserting an implant that would allow for bone to grow between the two vertebral bodies to bridge the gap left by the disc removal.


A number of different implants and implant materials have been used in PLIF with varying success. Current implants used for PLIF include threaded titanium cages and allografts. Threaded titanium cages suffer from the disadvantage of requiring drilling and tapping of the vertebral end plates for insertion. In addition, the incidence of subsidence in long term use is not known. Due to MRI incompatibility of titanium, determining fusion is problematic. Finally, restoration of lordosis, i.e., the natural curvature of the lumbar spine is very difficult when a cylindrical titanium cage is used.


Allografts are sections of bone taken from a long bone of a donor. A cross section of the bone is taken and processed using known techniques to preserve the allograft until implantation and reduce the risk of an adverse immunological response when implanted. For example, U.S. Pat. No. 4,678,470 discloses a method for processing a bone grafting material which uses glutaraldehyde tanning to produce a non-antigenic, biocompatible material. Allografts have mechanical properties which are similar to the mechanical properties of vertebrae even after processing. This prevents stress shielding that occurs with metallic implants. They are also MRI compatible so that fusion can be more accurately ascertained and promote the formation of bone, i.e., osteoconductive. Although the osteoconductive nature of the allograft provides a biological interlocking between the allograft and the vertebrae for long term mechanical strength, initial and short term mechanical strength of the interface between the allograft and the vertebrae are lacking as evidenced by the possibility of the allograft being expelled after implantation.


Currently commercially available allografts are simply sections of bone not specifically designed for use in PLIF. As a result, the fusion of the vertebral bodies does not occur in optimal anatomical position. A surgeon may do some minimal intraoperative shaping and sizing to customize the allograft for the patient's spinal anatomy. However, significant shaping and sizing of the allograft is not possible due to the nature of the allograft. Even if extensive shaping and sizing were possible, a surgeon's ability to manually shape and size the allograft to the desired dimensions is severely limited.


Most PLIF implants, whether threaded cages or allograft, are available in different sizes and have widths that vary with the implant height. For example, the width of a cylindrical cages will be substantially equivalent to the height. Although larger heights may be clinically indicated, wider implants are generally not desirable since increased width requires removal of more of the facet, which can lead to decreases stability, and more retraction of nerve roots, which can lead to temporary or permanent nerve damage.


As the discussion above illustrates, there is a need for an improved implant for fusing vertebrae.


SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

The present invention relates to an allogenic intervertebral implant for use when surgical fusion of vertebral bodies is indicated. The implant comprises a piece of allogenic bone conforming in size and shape with a portion of an end plates of the vertebrae and has a wedge-shaped profile with a plurality of teeth located on top and bottom surfaces. The top and bottom surfaces can be flat planar surfaces or curved surfaces to mimic the topography of the end plates. The implant has a channel on at least one side for receiving a surgical tool. This channel runs in the anterior direction to accommodate a variety of surgical approaches. A threaded hole on the anterior, posterior, posterior-lateral, or lateral side can be provided for receiving a threaded arm of an insertion tool.


In another embodiment, the implant has an interior space for receiving an osteoconductive material to promote the formation of new bone.


In another embodiment, the implant is made of a plurality of interconnecting sections with mating sections. Preferably, the implant is made in two halves: a top portion having a top connecting surface and a bottom portion having a bottom connecting surface. The top connecting surface mates with the bottom connecting surface when the top and bottom portions are joined. The top and bottom portions have holes that align for receiving a pin to secure the top and bottom portions together. The pin can be made of allogenic bone.


In a different embodiment, the medial side of the implant has a scalloped edge such that when a first implant is implanted with a second implant with the medial sides facing each other, the scalloped edges define a cylindrical space.


The present invention also relates to a discrete spacer used in conjunction with any of the other embodiments of the implant. The spacer comprises a piece of allogenic bone conforming in size and shape with a portion of an end plates of the vertebrae and has a wedge-shaped profile with substantially smooth top and bottom surfaces. The intersecting regions between the top and bottom surfaces and at least one of the lateral sides and the intersecting regions between the anterior and posterior sides and the same lateral side are curved surfaces to facilitate implantation of the spacer. Thus, the spacer can be implanted through an opening on one side of the spinal canal and moved with a surgical instrument to the contralateral side.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS


FIG. 1 is a top view of a first embodiment of the implant according to the present invention;



FIG. 2 is a side view of the implant of FIG. 1;



FIG. 3 is a back view of the implant of FIG. 1;



FIG. 4 is a top view of a second embodiment of the implant;



FIG. 5 is a side view of the implant of FIG. 4;



FIG. 6 is a top view of a third embodiment of the implant;



FIG. 7 is a side view of the implant of FIG. 6;



FIG. 8A is a top view of a top connecting surface of a top portion of the implant of FIG. 6;



FIG. 8B is a top view of a bottom connecting surface of a bottom portion of the implant of FIG. 6;



FIG. 9 is a perspective view of a fourth embodiment of the implant;



FIG. 10A is a side view of one embodiment of the teeth on the implant;



FIG. 10B is a side view of a second embodiment of the teeth of the implant;



FIG. 11 is a side view of an embodiment of the implant similar to the embodiment of FIGS. 6-8;



FIG. 12 is a top view of a vertebral bone characteristic of those of the cervical, thoracic, and lumbar spine;



FIG. 13 is a side view of sequentially aligned vertebral bones, such as are found in the cervical, thoracic, or lumbar spine;



FIG. 14 is a posterior view of a sequence of vertebrae; and



FIG. 15 is an end view of another embodiment of the implant.





DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS


FIG. 1 shows a top view of a first embodiment of intervertebral allograft spacer or implant 10 according to the present invention. Implant 10 conforms in size and shape with a portion of end plates of the vertebrae between which implant 10 is to be implanted. Because implant 10 is an allograft, implant 10 promotes the formation of new bone to fuse the two vertebral bodies together. Although implant 10 will probably be predominantly used in the lumbar region of the spine, implant 10 can be configured for implantation in any region of the spine. Implant 10 has a plurality of teeth 12 on superior and inferior surfaces 14, 16 which provide a mechanical interlock between implant 10 and the end plates. Teeth 12 provide the mechanical interlock by penetrating the end plates. The initial mechanical stability afforded by teeth 12 minimizes the risk of post-operative expulsion of implant 10. Teeth 12 can be pyramid-shaped (FIG. 10A). Preferably, the angle formed from the tip to the base is approximately 60°. Alternatively, teeth 12 have a saw tooth shape with the saw tooth running in the anterior-posterior direction (FIG. 10B).


As shown in FIG. 2 and FIG. 3, a first lateral side 18 has a channel 20 and a second lateral side 22 also has a channel 20. Channels 20 are sized to receive a surgical instrument such as an inserter for implantation of implant 10. If the inserter has a threaded arm, implant 10 can be provided with a threaded hole 24. In FIG. 2, channel 20 is shown extended only partially along first lateral side 18. Channel 20 can extend along the entire length of first lateral side 18 as shown in the embodiment of FIG. 5. In FIG. 3, channels 20 are shown on both first and second lateral sides 18, 22. It should be noted that implant 10 can also have no channels or channels on one lateral side only as shown in the embodiment of FIG. 9.


The dimensions of implant 10 can be varied to accommodate a patient's anatomy. Typically, implant 10 would have a width between 6-15 mm (in the medial-lateral direction), a length between 15-30 mm (in the anterior-posterior direction), and a height between 4-30 mm (maximum height in the superior-inferior direction). The size of implant 10 allows implant 10 to be implanted using conventional open surgical procedures or minimally invasive procedures, such as laparoscopic surgery. Additionally, because the width is kept to a restricted size range and does not necessarily increase with implant height, taller implants can be used without requiring wider implants. Thus, facet removal and retraction of nerve roots can remain minimal.


In order to restore the natural curvature of the spine after the affected disc has been removed, implant 10 has a wedge-shaped profile. As shown in FIG. 2, this wedge shape results from a gradual decrease in height from an anterior side 26 to a posterior side 28. In anatomical terms, the natural curvature of the lumbar spine is referred to as lordosis. When implant 10 is to be used in the lumbar region, the angle formed by the wedge should be approximately between 4.2° and 15° so that the wedge shape is a lordotic shape which mimics the anatomy of the lumbar spine.


In order to facilitate insertion of implant 10, anterior side 26 transitions to superior and inferior surfaces 14, 16 with rounded edges 30. Rounded edges 30 enable implant 10 to slide between the end plates while minimizing the necessary distraction of the end plates.


Although implant 10 is typically a solid piece of allogenic bone, implant 10 can be provided with a hollow interior to form an interior space. This interior space can be filled with bone chips or any other osteoconductive material to further promote the formation of new bone.



FIG. 4 shows a top view of a second embodiment of an implant 40 according to the present invention. In general, most of the structure of implant 40 is like or comparable to the structure of implant 10. Accordingly, discussion of the like components is not believed necessary. The superior and inferior surfaces 14, 16 of implant 10 are flat planar surfaces. As seen best in FIG. 5, superior and inferior surfaces 14, 16 of implant 40 are curved surfaces which still retain the wedge-shaped profile. The curved surfaces of superior and inferior surfaces 14, 16 of implant 40 are a mirror-image of the topography of the vertebral end plates. Thus, the curved surfaces conform to the contours of the end plates.



FIG. 6 shows a top view of a third embodiment of an implant 50 according to the present invention. In general, most of the structure of implant 50 is like or comparable to the structure of implants 10, 40. Accordingly, discussion of the like components is not believed necessary. As best seen in FIG. 7, implant 50 comprises a top portion 52 joined to a bottom portion 54. As it may be difficult to obtain a single section of allogenic bone from which implant 50 is to be made, fabricating implant 50 in two pieces, i.e. top and bottom portions 52, 54, allows smaller sections of allogenic bone to be used. A top connecting surface 56 and a bottom connecting surface 58 define the interface between top and bottom portions 52, 54. As shown in FIGS. 8A and 8B, top and bottom surfaces 56, 58 have ridges 60 that mate with grooves 62 to interlock top and bottom portions 52, 54. Preferably, ridges 60 and grooves 62 are formed by milling top and bottom surfaces 56, 58 in a first direction and then milling a second time with top and bottom surfaces 56, 58 oriented 90° with respect to the first direction.


A pin 64 passing through aligned holes 66 in top and bottom portions 52, 54 serves to retain top and bottom portions 52, 54 together. Although pin 64 can be made of any biocompatible material, pin 64 is preferably made of allogenic bone. The number and orientation of pins 64 can be varied.



FIG. 11 shows an embodiment of an implant 80 which, like implant 50, is made in multiple pieces. In general, most of the structure of implant 80 is like or comparable to the structure of implants 10, 40, 50. Accordingly, discussion of the like components is not believed necessary. Implant 80 has a top portion 82, a middle portion 84, and a bottom portion 86. As was the case for implant 80, the surfaces between the portions are mating surfaces with interlocking surface features, such as ridges and grooves. One or more pins preferably hold top, middle, and bottom portions 82, 84, 86 together.



FIG. 9 shows a perspective view of a fourth embodiment of a first implant 70 according to the present invention. A second implant 70′, which is substantially similar to first implant 70, is also shown. In general, most of the structure of first and second implants 70, 70′ is like or comparable to the structure of implants 10, 40, 50. Accordingly, discussion of the like components is not believed necessary. First lateral sides 18 of first and second implants 70, 70′ are scalloped to have a C-shape. When first and second implants 70, 70′ are placed side by side with the first lateral sides 18 facing each other, a cylindrical space 72 is formed. When first and second implants 70, 70′ are implanted together, cylindrical space 72 can be filled with osteoconductive material to help promote the formation of new bone. First and second implants 70, 70′ can be provided with locking pins 74 which engage apertures 76 to maintain the spatial relationship between first and second implants 70, 70′.


The use of the implant according to the present invention will now be described with reference to FIGS. 12-14 and using posterior lumbar interbody fusion as an example. As the implant according to the present invention conforms in size and shape to a portion of end plates 100, preoperative planning is recommended for proper sizing. Determine the appropriate implant height by measuring adjacent intervertebral discs 102 on a lateral radiograph. The implant must be seated firmly with a tight fit between end plates 100 when the segment is fully distracted. The tallest possible implant should be used to maximize segmental stability. Due to variability in degrees of magnification from radiographs, the measurements are only an estimate.


With the patient in a prone position on a lumbar frame, radiographic equipment can assist in confirming the precise intraoperative position of the implant. The surgeon incises and dissects the skin from the midline laterally and locates spinous process 104, lamina 106, dura 108, and nerve roots of the appropriate level(s). As much as facets 110 as possible should be preserved to provide stability to the intervertebral segment. The surgeon performs a laminotomy to the medial aspect of facet 110 and reflects dura 108 to expose an approximately 13 mm window to the disc space. Disc 102 is removed through the window until only anterior 112 and lateral 114 annulus remain. The superficial layers of the entire cartilaginous end plates 100 are also removed to expose bleeding bone. Excessive removal of the subchondral bone may weaken the anterior column. Furthermore, if the entire end plate is removed, this may result in subsidence and a loss of segmental stability.


Distraction can be done with either a surgical distractor or a trial spacer implant. In the first method, the distractor blades are placed into the disc space lateral to dura 108. The curve on the neck of the distractor should be oriented toward the midline. The distractor blades should be completely inserted into the disc space so that the ridges at the end of the blades rest on vertebral body 116. Fluoroscopy can assist in confirming that the distractor blades are parallel to end plates 100. Correct placement will angle the handles of the distractor cranially. particularly at L5-S1. The handle of the distractor is squeezed to distract the innerspace. The distraction is secured by tightening the speed nut on the handle.


Using the preoperatively determined size, a trial spacer is inserted in the contralateral disc space with gentle impaction. Fluoroscopy and tactile judgement can assist in confirming the fit of the trial spacer until a secure fit is achieved. Using either the slots or threader hole on the implant, the selected implant is inserted in the contralateral disc space. Alternatively, the channels on the implant allow distraction and insertion to occur on the same side. Regardless of the side the implant is inserted in, autogenous cancellous bone or a bone substitute should be placed in the anterior and medial aspect of the vertebral disc space prior to placement of the second implant. The distractor is removed and a second implant of the same height as the first implant is inserted into the space, using gentle impaction as before. Preferably, the implants are recessed 2-4 mm beyond the posterior rim of the vertebral body.


As previously noted, the implant according to the present invention can be inserted using minimally invasive procedures. In some of these procedures, only one side of the spinal cord needs to be approached. This minimizes muscle stripping, scar tissue in the canal, and nerve root retraction and handling. In clinical situations in which bilateral implant placement is required, proper implantation on the side opposite the incision can be difficult. FIG. 15 shows a beveled spacer 120 that facilitates placement on the side contralateral to the incision. In general and unless otherwise described, most of the structure of beveled spacer 120 is like or comparable to the structure of implants 10, 40, 50, and 80. Accordingly, discussion of the like components is not believed necessary. First lateral side 18 transitions to superior and inferior surfaces 14, 16 with rounded edges 30. First lateral side 18 also transitions to anterior and posterior sides 26, 28 with rounded edges 30. Additionally, spacer 120 has no teeth. The lack of teeth and rounded edges 30 enable spacer 120 to slide between the end plate and across the evacuated disc space (from one lateral annulus to the other) to the contralateral side. As first lateral side 18 is the side that must promote movement of spacer 120, the use of rounded edges 30 on second lateral side 22 is optionally. Once spacer 120 has been placed on the side contralateral to the single incision using a surgical instrument to push spacer 120, bone graft or other osteoconductive material is packed in the disc space. Finally, an implant (any of implant 10, 40, 50, 70, or 70′ can be used) is implanted in the side proximal to the incision.


While it is apparent that the illustrative embodiments of the invention herein disclosed fulfil the objectives stated above, it will be appreciated that numerous modifications and other embodiments may be devised by those skilled in the art. Therefore, it will be understood that the appended claims are intended to cover all such modifications and embodiments which come within the spirit and scope of the present invention.

Claims
  • 1. An intervertebral implant comprising a plug of allogenic bone conforming in size and shape with a portion of the end plates of adjacent vertebrae, wherein the top and bottom surfaces of the implant include a plurality of teeth provided in at least a two dimensional array with the teeth being spaced apart from one another for interlocking with the adjacent vertebrae, and wherein the teeth have a pyramidal shape profile defined by four sides meeting together to form a tip; wherein the sides opposite each other form an acute angle of approximately 60 degrees at the tip.
  • 2. The implant of claim 1 wherein the implant has an interior space for receiving osteoconductive material to promote the formation of new bone.
  • 3. The implant of claim 2 wherein the osteoconductive material comprises bone chips.
  • 4. The implant of claim 1 wherein the implant has a wedge-shaped profile to help restore disc height and spine curvature.
  • 5. The implant of claim 1 wherein the implant is formed of more than one piece of allogenic bone.
  • 6. The implant of claim 1 wherein the top and bottom surfaces are curved surfaces.
  • 7. The implant of claim 1 wherein the teeth are integral with the top and bottom surfaces.
  • 8. The implant of claim 1 wherein the teeth on the top and bottom surfaces are interrupted to form a channel to receive an insertion instrument for placing the implant.
  • 9. A method for restoring disc height between adjacent vertebrae having facing endplates, the method comprising: removing at least a portion of a disc located between the adjacent vertebrae; distracting an inner space between the facing endplates; and inserting the implant of claim 1 into the distracted inner space.
  • 10. The method of claim 9 further comprising measuring a distance between the adjacent vertebrae with a preoperative lateral radiograph to determine an implant height.
  • 11. The method of claim 9 wherein a distractor is used to distract the inner space.
  • 12. The method of claim 11 further comprising inserting a trial spacer implant to determine an implant height.
  • 13. The method of claim 9 wherein the implant further includes an interior space arid the method further comprises placing osteoconductive material into the interior space of the implant.
  • 14. An implant for restoring disc height between adjacent vertebrae having facing endplates comprising an annular plug of allogenic bone surrounding an interior space, the plug having top and bottom surfaces configured and adapted in use to face the endplates of adjacent vertebrae, wherein the top and bottom surfaces include a plurality of teeth provided in at least a two dimensional array, and wherein the teeth have a pyramidal shape defined by four sides meeting together to form a tip; wherein the sides opposite each other form an acute angle of approximately 60 degrees at the tip.
  • 15. The implant of claim 14 wherein the implant has a wedge-shaped profile to help restore disc height and spine curvature.
  • 16. The implant of claim 15 wherein the top and bottom surfaces are curved surfaces.
  • 17. The implant of claim 14 wherein the teeth are integral with the top and bottom surfaces.
  • 18. The implant of claim 14 wherein the implant is formed of more than one piece of allogenic bone.
  • 19. An intervertebral implant comprising at least one piece of allogenic bone provided with a hollow interior space, the implant having top and bottom surfaces configured and adapted in use to face the end plates of adjacent vertebrae, wherein the top and bottom surfaces include a plurality of teeth provided in a plurality of adjacent rows, and wherein at least a portion of the teeth have a pyramidal shape defined by four sides meeting together to form a tip; wherein the sides apposite each other form an acute angle at the tip; the implant further comprising a pair of parallel channels extending along the entire length of the implant, the channels being substantially smooth, devoid of teeth, and being adapted and configured to receive a single surgical instrument.
  • 20. The implant of claim 19, wherein the top and bottom surfaces each have an opening communicating with the hollow interior space.
  • 21. The implant of claim 19, wherein the interior space and openings form a substantially cylindrical chamber.
  • 22. The implant of claim 19, wherein the angle is approximately 60°.
  • 23. The implant of claim 19, wherein the implant is substantially symmetrical about a mid-plane of the implant.
  • 24. The implant of claim 23, wherein the implant has a wedge shaped profile such that the top surface is inclined with reaped to the bottom surface.
  • 25. The implant of claim 24, wherein the angle of inclination between the top surface and the midplane is between about 4.2° and about 15°.
  • 26. The implant of claim 25, wherein the top and bottom surfaces are substantially flat planar surfaces.
  • 27. The implant of claim 25, wherein the top and bottom surfaces are curved surfaces.
  • 28. The implant of claim 19, wherein the implant has first and second sides and a gradual decrease in height from the first side to the second side.
  • 29. The implant of claim 19, wherein the implant has at least one rounded edge between the top and bottom surfaces to facilitate insertion of the implant.
  • 30. The implant of claim 19, further comprising at least two lateral sides wherein the channels are formed in the two lateral sides.
  • 31. The implant of claim 19, wherein the implant is formed of more than one piece of bone.
  • 32. The implant of claim 31, wherein the pieces of bone are arranged side by side and the top and bottom surfaces are formed of more than one piece of bone.
  • 33. The implant of claim 19, wherein the teeth are arranged to cover substantially the entire top and bottom surfaces.
  • 34. An intervertebral implant formed of at least one piece of allogenic bone provided with a hollow substantially cylindrical interior space, the implant comprising: a mid-plane about which the implant is substantially symmetrical; top and bottom surfaces configured and adapted in use to face the end plates of adjacent vertebrae, the top and bottom surface each having an opening communication with the substantially cylindrical space, and the top surface being inclined in a range between about 4.2° and about 15° with respect to the mid-plane; at least two substantially smooth parallel channels adapted and configured to receive a surgical instrument; and at least one rounded edge between the top and bottom surfaces to facilitate insertion of the implant; wherein the top and bottom surfaces comprise a plurality of teeth provided in a plurality of adjacent rows, and further wherein the teeth are defined by four sides, at least three of the sides forming an acute angle with respect to the respective top and bottom surfaces.
  • 35. The implant of claim 34, wherein the top and bottom surfaces are substantially flat planer surfaces.
  • 36. The implant of claim 34, wherein the top and bottom surfaces are substantially flat in a first direction and curved in a second direction.
  • 37. The implant of claim 34 formed of more than one piece of allogenic bone arranged side by side and adapted and configured such that the top and bottom surfaces are formed of more than one piece of bone.
  • 38. The implant of claim 34, wherein the top and bottom surfaces are curved.
  • 39. An intervertebral implant comprising a plug of allogenic bone conforming in size and shape with a portion of the end plates of adjacent vertebrae, wherein the top and bottom surfaces of the implant include a plurality of teeth provided in at least a two dimensional array with the teeth being spaced apart from one another for interlocking with the adjacent vertebrae, and wherein the teeth have a pyramidal shape profile defined by four sides forming an acute angle with respect to the respective top and bottom surfaces of the implant; wherein the implant has a wedge-shaped profile such that the top surface is inclined with respect to the bottom surface at an angle of inclination of between about 4° and about 15° to help restore disc height and spine curvature.
  • 40. An intervertebral implant comprising a plug of allogenic bone conforming in size and shape with a portion of the end plates of adjacent vertebrae, wherein the top and bottom surfaces of the implant include a plurality of teeth provided in at least a two dimensional array with the teeth being spaced apart from one another for interlocking with the adjacent vertebrae, and wherein the teeth have a pyramidal shape profile defined by four sides forming an acute angle with respect to the respective top and bottom surfaces of the implant; wherein the implant is formed of more than one piece of allogenic bone.
  • 41. The implant of claim 41, wherein the implant is formed of at least two pieces of bone and at least two pieces are connected by pins.
  • 42. The implant of claim 42, wherein the pieces of bone are arranged side by side and the top and bottom surfaces are formed of more than one piece of bone.
  • 43. An intervertebral implant comprising a plug of allogenic bone conforming in size and shape with a portion of the end plates of adjacent vertebrae, wherein the top and bottom surfaces of the implant include a plurality of teeth provided in at least a two dimensional array with the teeth being spaced apart from one another for interlocking with the adjacent vertebrae, and wherein the teeth have a pyramidal shape profile defined by four sides forming an acute angle with respect to the respective top and bottom surfaces of the implant; wherein the top and bottom surfaces are curved surfaces.
  • 44. A method for restoring disc height between adjacent vertebrae having facing endplates, the method comprising: measuring a distance between the adjacent vertebrae with a preoperative lateral radiograph to determine an implant height; removing at least a portion of a disc located between the adjacent vertebrae; distracting an inner space between the facing endplates; and inserting an intervertebral implant into the distracted inner space, the implant comprising a plug of allogenic bone conforming in size and shape with a portion of the end plates of adjacent vertebrae, wherein the top and bottom surfaces of the implant include a plurality of teeth provided in at least a two dimensional array with the teeth being spaced apart from one another for interlocking with the adjacent vertebrae, and wherein the teeth have a pyramidal shape profile defined by four sides fanning an acute angle with respect to the respective lop and bottom surfaces of the implant.
  • 45. An implant for restoring disc height between adjacent vertebrae having facing endplates comprising an annular plug of allogenic bone surrounding an interior space, the plug having top and bottom surfaces configured and adapted in use to face the endplates of adjacent vertebrae, wherein the top and bottom surfaces include a plurality of teeth provided in at least a two dimensional array, and wherein the teeth have a pyramidal shape defined by four sides forming an acute angle with respect to the respective top and bottom surfaces of the implant; wherein the implant is formed of more than one piece of allogenic bone.
  • 46. An intervertebral implant comprising at least one piece of allogenic bone provided with a hollow interior space, the implant having top and bottom surfaces configured and adapted in use to face the end plates of adjacent vertebrae, wherein the top and bottom surfaces include a plurality of teeth provided in a plurality of adjacent rows, and wherein at least a portion of the teeth have a pyramidal shape defined by four sides forming an acute angle with respect to the respective top and bottom surfaces of the implant; wherein: the implant is substantially symmetrical about a mid-plane of the implant; and the implant has a wedge shaped profile such that the top surface is inclined with respect to the bottom surface, an angle of inclination between the top surface and the midplane is between about 4.2° and about 15°.
  • 47. The implant of claim 46, wherein the top and bottom surfaces are substantially flat planar surfaces.
  • 48. The implant of claim 46, wherein th top and bottom surfaces are curved surfaces.
  • 49. An intervertebral implant comprising at least one piece of allogenic bone provided with a hollow interior space, the implant having top and bottom surfaces configured and adapted in use to face the end plates of adjacent vertebrae, wherein the top and bottom surfaces include a plurality of teeth provided in a plurality of adjacent rows, and wherein at least a portion of the teeth have a pyramidal shape defined by four sides meeting together to form a tip; wherein the sides opposite each other form an acute angle of approximately 60° at the tip; wherein the implant has first and second sides and a gradual decrease in height from the first side to the second side.
  • 50. An intervertebral implant comprising at least one piece of allogenic boric provided with a hollow interior space, the implant having top and bottom surfaces configured and adapted in use to face the end plates of adjacent vertebrae, wherein the top and bottom surfaces include a plurality of teeth provided in a plurality of adjacent rows, and wherein at least a portion of the teeth have a pyramidal shape defined by four sides meeting together to form a tip; wherein the sides opposite each other form an acute angle of approximately 60° at the tip; wherein the implant has at least one rounded edge between the top and bottom surfaces to facilitate insertion of the implant.
  • 51. An intervertebral implant comprising: at least one piece of allogenic bone provided with a hollow interior space, the implant having top and bottom surfaces configured and adapted in use to face the end plates of adjacent vertebrae; and a pair of parallel channels adapted and configured to receive a single surgical instrument; wherein: the top and bottom surfaces include a plurality of teeth provided in a plurality of adjacent rows, and wherein at least a portion of the teeth have a pyramidal shape defined by four sides forming an acute angle with respect to the respective top and bottom surfaces of the implant; and at least one channel extends along the entire length of the implant and is substantially devoid of teeth.
  • 52. The implant of claim 51, further comprising at least two lateral sides wherein the channels are formed in the two lateral sides.
  • 53. An intervertebral implant comprising at least one piece of allogenic bone provided with a hollow interior spare, the implant having top and bottom surfaces configured and adapted in use to face the end plates of adjacent vertebrae, wherein the top and bottom surfaces include a plurality of teeth provided in a plurality of adjacent rows, and wherein at least a portion of the teeth have a pyramidal shape defined by four sides forming an acute angle with respect to the respective top and bottom surfaces of the implant; wherein the implant is formed of more than one piece of bone.
  • 54. The implant of claim 53, wherein the implant is formed of at least two pieces of bone and at least two pieces are connected by pins.
  • 55. The implant of claim 54, the pieces of bone are arranged side by side and the top and bottom surfaces are formed of more than one piece of bone.
  • 56. An implant for restoring disc height between adjacent vertebrae having facing endplates comprising an annular plug of allogenic bone surrounding an interior space, the plug having top and bottom surfaces configured and adapted in use to face the endplate of adjacent vertebrae, wherein the top and bottom surfaces include a plurality of teeth provided in at least a two dimensional array, and wherein the teeth have a pyramidal shape defined by four sides forming an acute angle with respect to the respective top and bottom surfaces of the implant; wherein: the angle formed from the tip of the teeth to a base where the sides meet with the respective top and bottom surfaces is approximately 60 degrees; and the implant bas a wedge-shaped profile to help restore disc height and spine curvature.
  • 57. The implant of claim 56 wherein the top and bottom surfaces are curved surfaces.
  • 58. An intervertebral implant comprising at least one piece of allogenic bone provided with a hollow interior space, the implant having top and bottom surfaces configured and adapted in use to face the end plates of adjacent vertebrae, wherein the top and bottom surfaces include a plurality of teeth provided in a plurality of adjacent rows, and wherein at least a portion of the teeth have a pyramidal shape defined by four sides forming an acute angle with respect to the respective top and bottom surfaces of the implant; wherein the angle formed from the tip of the pyramidal teeth to a base where the sides meet with the respective top arid bottom surfaces is approximately 60°.
CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/363,844, filed Jul. 30, 1999, now U.S. Pat. No. 6,258,125, which claims the benefit under 35 U.S.C. § 119(e) of Provisional Application No. 60/095,209, filed Aug. 3, 1998, and is a continuation-in-part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/219,439, filed Dec. 23, 1998, now U.S. Pat. No. 6,143,033, which in turn claims the benefit under 35 U.S.C. § 119(e) of Provisional Application No. 60/073,271, filed on Jan. 30, 1998 and Provisional Application No. 60/095,425, filed on Aug. 5, 1998. The entire content of each of these applications is expressly incorporated herein by reference thereto.

US Referenced Citations (250)
Number Name Date Kind
2621145 Sano Dec 1952 A
3848601 Ma et al. Nov 1974 A
4011602 Rybicki et al. Mar 1977 A
4059115 Jumashev et al. Nov 1977 A
4172128 Thiele et al. Oct 1979 A
4222128 Tomonaga et al. Sep 1980 A
4237559 Borom Dec 1980 A
4294753 Urist Oct 1981 A
4344190 Lee et al. Aug 1982 A
4394370 Jefferies Jul 1983 A
4430760 Smestad Feb 1984 A
4440750 Glowacki et al. Apr 1984 A
4472840 Jefferies Sep 1984 A
4485097 Bell Nov 1984 A
4501269 Bagby Feb 1985 A
4610692 Eitenmuller et al. Sep 1986 A
4625722 Murray Dec 1986 A
4627434 Murray Dec 1986 A
4627853 Campbell et al. Dec 1986 A
4645503 Lin et al. Feb 1987 A
4654464 Mittelmeier et al. Mar 1987 A
4678470 Nashef et al. Jul 1987 A
4728570 Ashman et al. Mar 1988 A
4743259 Bolander et al. May 1988 A
4745914 Frey et al. May 1988 A
4755184 Silverberg Jul 1988 A
4781721 Grundei Nov 1988 A
4789663 Wallace et al. Dec 1988 A
4834757 Brantigan May 1989 A
4858603 Clemow et al. Aug 1989 A
4863472 Törmälä et al. Sep 1989 A
4877020 Vich Oct 1989 A
4902296 Bolander et al. Feb 1990 A
4932973 Gendler Jun 1990 A
4936848 Bagby Jun 1990 A
4950295 Weigum et al. Aug 1990 A
4950296 McIntyre Aug 1990 A
4961740 Ray et al. Oct 1990 A
4969906 Kronman Nov 1990 A
4975526 Kuberasampath et al. Dec 1990 A
4994084 Brennan Feb 1991 A
5026373 Ray et al. Jun 1991 A
5053049 Campbell Oct 1991 A
5061286 Lyle Oct 1991 A
5061287 Feiler Oct 1991 A
5062850 MacMillan et al. Nov 1991 A
5067962 Campbell et al. Nov 1991 A
5073373 O'Leary et al. Dec 1991 A
5078746 Garner Jan 1992 A
5092887 Gendler Mar 1992 A
5092891 Kummer et al. Mar 1992 A
5092892 Ashby Mar 1992 A
5092893 Smith Mar 1992 A
5112354 Sires May 1992 A
5133718 Mao Jul 1992 A
5133755 Brekke Jul 1992 A
5141510 Takagi et al. Aug 1992 A
5152791 Hakamatsuka et al. Oct 1992 A
5162114 Kuberasampath et al. Nov 1992 A
5171275 Ling et al. Dec 1992 A
5192327 Brantigan Mar 1993 A
5211664 Tepic et al. May 1993 A
5236456 O'Leary et al. Aug 1993 A
5275954 Wolfinbarger et al. Jan 1994 A
5281226 Davydov et al. Jan 1994 A
5282861 Kaplan Feb 1994 A
5284655 Bogdansky et al. Feb 1994 A
5290558 O'Leary et al. Mar 1994 A
5298254 Prewett et al. Mar 1994 A
5300077 Howell Apr 1994 A
5306302 Bauer et al. Apr 1994 A
5306303 Lynch Apr 1994 A
5306304 Gendler Apr 1994 A
5306308 Gross et al. Apr 1994 A
5306309 Wagner et al. Apr 1994 A
5314476 Prewett et al. May 1994 A
5320644 Baumgartner Jun 1994 A
5329846 Bonutti Jul 1994 A
5366508 Brekke Nov 1994 A
5376120 Sarver et al. Dec 1994 A
5383932 Wilson et al. Jan 1995 A
5401269 Buttner-Janz et al. Mar 1995 A
5405390 O'Leary et al. Apr 1995 A
5405391 Hednerson et al. Apr 1995 A
5423817 Lin Jun 1995 A
5425768 Carpenter et al. Jun 1995 A
5425769 Snyders, Jr. Jun 1995 A
5425770 Piez et al. Jun 1995 A
5425772 Brantigan Jun 1995 A
5433751 Christel et al. Jul 1995 A
5439684 Prewett et al. Aug 1995 A
5443514 Steffee Aug 1995 A
5458638 Kuslich et al. Oct 1995 A
5484437 Michelson Jan 1996 A
5484601 O'Leary et al. Jan 1996 A
5489307 Kuslich et al. Feb 1996 A
5489308 Kuslich et al. Feb 1996 A
5492697 Boyan et al. Feb 1996 A
5501706 Arenberg Mar 1996 A
5507813 Dowd et al. Apr 1996 A
5510396 Prewett et al. Apr 1996 A
5514180 Heggeness et al. May 1996 A
5516532 Atala et al. May 1996 A
5522899 Michelson Jun 1996 A
5531791 Wolfinbarger, Jr. Jul 1996 A
5534030 Navarro et al. Jul 1996 A
5545222 Bonutti Aug 1996 A
5549679 Kuslich Aug 1996 A
5554191 Lahille et al. Sep 1996 A
5554192 Crowninshield Sep 1996 A
5556379 Wolfinbarger Sep 1996 A
5556430 Gendler Sep 1996 A
5569308 Sottosanti Oct 1996 A
5570706 Howell Nov 1996 A
5571190 Ulrich et al. Nov 1996 A
5571192 Schönhöffer Nov 1996 A
5585116 Boniface et al. Dec 1996 A
5591235 Kuslich Jan 1997 A
5593409 Michelson Jan 1997 A
5603716 Morgan et al. Feb 1997 A
5607474 Athanasiou et al. Mar 1997 A
5609635 Michelson Mar 1997 A
5609636 Kohrs et al. Mar 1997 A
5609637 Biedermann et al. Mar 1997 A
5645598 Brosnahan, III Jul 1997 A
5658337 Kohrs et al. Aug 1997 A
5658351 Dudasik et al. Aug 1997 A
5665120 Ohtsuka et al. Sep 1997 A
5676699 Gogolewski et al. Oct 1997 A
5683394 Rinner Nov 1997 A
5683463 Godefroy et al. Nov 1997 A
5683464 Wagner et al. Nov 1997 A
5697981 Ison et al. Dec 1997 A
5702449 McKay Dec 1997 A
5702453 Rabbe et al. Dec 1997 A
5702455 Saggar Dec 1997 A
5709683 Bagby Jan 1998 A
5716415 Steffee Feb 1998 A
5722977 Wilhelmy Mar 1998 A
5725579 Fages et al. Mar 1998 A
5725813 Nies Mar 1998 A
5728159 Stroever et al. Mar 1998 A
5733288 Allen Mar 1998 A
5741253 Michelson Apr 1998 A
5741261 Moskovitz et al. Apr 1998 A
5755793 Smith et al. May 1998 A
5766252 Henry et al. Jun 1998 A
5766253 Brosnahan, III Jun 1998 A
5769897 Härle Jun 1998 A
5776197 Rabbe et al. Jul 1998 A
5776198 Rabbe et al. Jul 1998 A
5776199 Michelson Jul 1998 A
5782830 Farris Jul 1998 A
5782915 Stone Jul 1998 A
5782917 Carn Jul 1998 A
5785710 Michelson Jul 1998 A
5785714 Morgan et al. Jul 1998 A
5797871 Wolfinbarger, Jr. Aug 1998 A
5798096 Pavlyk Aug 1998 A
5814084 Grivas et al. Sep 1998 A
5820581 Wolfinbarger, Jr. Oct 1998 A
5824078 Nelson et al. Oct 1998 A
5824084 Muschler Oct 1998 A
5824088 Kirsch Oct 1998 A
5861043 Carn Jan 1999 A
5865845 Thalgott Feb 1999 A
5865848 Baker Feb 1999 A
5865849 Stone Feb 1999 A
5868749 Reed Feb 1999 A
5876455 Harwin Mar 1999 A
5879403 Ostiguy et al. Mar 1999 A
5885292 Moskovitz et al. Mar 1999 A
5885299 Winslow et al. Mar 1999 A
5888222 Coates et al. Mar 1999 A
5888224 Beckers et al. Mar 1999 A
5888227 Cottle Mar 1999 A
5895426 Scarborough et al. Apr 1999 A
5897593 Kohrs et al. Apr 1999 A
5899939 Boyce et al. May 1999 A
5899941 Nishijima et al. May 1999 A
5902338 Stone May 1999 A
5904716 Gendler May 1999 A
5904719 Errico et al. May 1999 A
5910315 Stevenson et al. Jun 1999 A
5913900 Stone Jun 1999 A
5919196 Bobic et al. Jul 1999 A
5922027 Stone Jul 1999 A
5935169 Chan Aug 1999 A
5944755 Stone Aug 1999 A
5968047 Reed Oct 1999 A
5968098 Winslow Oct 1999 A
5972034 Hofmann et al. Oct 1999 A
5972368 McKay Oct 1999 A
5976187 Richelsoph Nov 1999 A
5980522 Koros et al. Nov 1999 A
5981828 Nelson et al. Nov 1999 A
5984922 McKay Nov 1999 A
5984967 Zdeblick et al. Nov 1999 A
5989289 Coates et al. Nov 1999 A
5990382 Fox Nov 1999 A
5997580 Mastrorio et al. Dec 1999 A
5997581 Khalili Dec 1999 A
6005161 Brekke et al. Dec 1999 A
6008433 Stone Dec 1999 A
6013853 Athanasiou et al. Jan 2000 A
6025538 Yaccarino, III Feb 2000 A
6030635 Gertzman et al. Feb 2000 A
6033405 Winslow et al. Mar 2000 A
6033438 Bianchi et al. Mar 2000 A
6039762 McKay Mar 2000 A
6045554 Grooms et al. Apr 2000 A
6045579 Hochshuler et al. Apr 2000 A
6045580 Scarborough et al. Apr 2000 A
6049025 Stone et al. Apr 2000 A
6053916 Moore Apr 2000 A
6059790 Sand et al. May 2000 A
6080158 Lin Jun 2000 A
6080193 Hochshuler et al. Jun 2000 A
6090998 Grooms et al. Jul 2000 A
6096080 Nicholson et al. Aug 2000 A
6096081 Grivas et al. Aug 2000 A
6110482 Khouri et al. Aug 2000 A
6111164 Rainey et al. Aug 2000 A
6123731 Boyce et al. Sep 2000 A
6143030 Schroder Nov 2000 A
6143033 Paul et al. Nov 2000 A
6156070 Incavo et al. Dec 2000 A
6174311 Branch et al. Jan 2001 B1
6187329 Agrawal et al. Feb 2001 B1
6200347 Anderson et al. Mar 2001 B1
6206923 Boyd et al. Mar 2001 B1
6241769 Nicholson et al. Jun 2001 B1
6245108 Biscup Jun 2001 B1
6258125 Paul et al. Jul 2001 B1
6261586 McKay Jul 2001 B1
6270528 McKay Aug 2001 B1
6277149 Boyle et al. Aug 2001 B1
6371988 Pafford et al. Apr 2002 B1
6482233 Aebi et al. Nov 2002 B1
6494883 Ferree Dec 2002 B1
6511509 Ford et al. Jan 2003 B1
6554863 Paul et al. Apr 2003 B2
20010001129 McKay et al. May 2001 A1
20010010021 Boyd et al. Jul 2001 A1
20010014831 Scarborough Aug 2001 A1
20010016775 Scarborough et al. Aug 2001 A1
20010016777 Biscup Aug 2001 A1
20020091447 Shimp et al. Jul 2002 A1
20020106393 Bianchi et al. Aug 2002 A1
20020107570 Sybert et al. Aug 2002 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (54)
Number Date Country
29 10 627 Sep 1980 DE
42 42 889 Jun 1994 DE
44 23 257 Jan 1996 DE
299 13 200 Oct 1999 DE
0 366 029 May 1990 EP
0 505 634 Sep 1992 EP
0 517 030 Dec 1992 EP
0 520 237 Dec 1992 EP
0 538 183 Apr 1993 EP
0 577 178 Jan 1994 EP
0 639 351 Feb 1995 EP
0 646 366 Apr 1995 EP
0 966 930 Dec 1999 EP
2645748 Oct 1990 FR
2 552 659 Feb 1995 FR
2 717 068 Sep 1995 FR
2 220 571 Jan 1990 GB
178993 Jul 1988 JP
064099 Sep 1990 JP
093100 Nov 1990 JP
165740 Feb 1991 JP
6-14947 Jan 1994 JP
833226 May 1981 SU
1465040 Mar 1989 SU
WO 9426211 Nov 1994 WO
WO 9426213 Nov 1994 WO
WO 9508964 Apr 1995 WO
WO 9515133 Jun 1995 WO
WO 9611642 Apr 1996 WO
WO 9639988 Dec 1996 WO
WO 9714378 Apr 1997 WO
WO 9715248 May 1997 WO
WO 9725945 Jul 1997 WO
WO 9732547 Sep 1997 WO
WO 9817209 Apr 1998 WO
WO 9855052 Dec 1998 WO
WO 9856319 Dec 1998 WO
WO 9856433 Dec 1998 WO
WO 9909914 Mar 1999 WO
WO 9913806 Mar 1999 WO
WO 9929271 Jun 1999 WO
WO 9932055 Jul 1999 WO
WO 9938461 Aug 1999 WO
WO 0007527 Feb 2000 WO
WO 0007528 Feb 2000 WO
WO 0030568 Jun 2000 WO
WO 0040177 Jul 2000 WO
WO 0040179 Jul 2000 WO
WO 0041654 Jul 2000 WO
WO 0042954 Jul 2000 WO
WO 0059412 Oct 2000 WO
WO 0074607 Dec 2000 WO
WO 0074608 Dec 2000 WO
WO 018611 Feb 2001 WO
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20010049560 A1 Dec 2001 US
Provisional Applications (3)
Number Date Country
60095209 Aug 1998 US
60073271 Jan 1998 US
60095425 Aug 1998 US
Continuations (1)
Number Date Country
Parent 09363844 Jul 1999 US
Child 09828625 US
Continuation in Parts (1)
Number Date Country
Parent 09219439 Dec 1998 US
Child 09363844 US