The invention generally relates to a surgical method of intervertebral disc wall reconstruction. The invention also relates to an annular repair device, or stent, for annular disc repair. The effects of said reconstruction are restoration of disc wall integrity and reduction of the failure rate (3-21%) of a common surgical procedure (disc fragment removal or discectomy). This surgical procedure is performed about 390,000 times annually in the United States.
The spinal column is formed from a number of vertebrae, which in their normal state are separated from each other by cartilaginous intervertebral discs. The intervertebral disc acts in the spine as a crucial stabilizer, and as a mechanism for force distribution between the vertebral bodies. Without the disc, collapse of the intervertebral space occurs in conjunction with abnormal joint mechanics and premature development of arthritic changes.
The normal intervertebral disc has an outer ligamentous ring called the annulus surrounding the nucleus pulposus. The annulus binds the adjacent vertebrae together and is constituted of collagen fibers that are attached to the vertebrae and cross each other so that half of the individual fibers will tighten as the vertebrae are rotated in either direction, thus resisting twisting or torsional motion. The nucleus pulposus is constituted of loose tissue, having about 85% water content, which moves about during bending from front to back and from side to side.
The aging process contributes to gradual changes in the intervertebral discs. The annulus loses much of its flexibility and resilience, becoming more dense and solid in composition. The aging annulus is also marked by the appearance on propagation of cracks or fissures in the annular wall. Similarly, the nucleus dessicates, increasing viscosity and thus losing its fluidity. In combination, these features of the aged intervertebral discs result in less dynamic stress distribution because of the more viscous nucleus pulposus, and less ability to withstand localized stresses by the annulus fibrosus due to its dessication, loss of flexibility and the presence of fissures. Occasionally fissures may form rents through the annular wall. In these instances, the nucleus pulposus is urged outwardly from the subannular space through a rent, often into the spinal column. Extruded nucleus pulposus can, and often does, mechanically press on the spinal cord or spinal nerve rootlet. This painful condition is clinically referred to as a ruptured or herniated disc.
In the event of annulus rupture, the subannular nucleus pulposus migrates along the path of least resistance forcing the fissure to open further, allowing migration of the nucleus pulposus through the wall of the disc, with resultant nerve compression and leakage of chemicals of inflammation into the space around the adjacent nerve roots supplying the extremities, bladder, bowel and genitalia. The usual effect of nerve compression and inflammation is intolerable back or neck pain, radiating into the extremities, with accompanying numbness, weakness, and in late stages, paralysis and muscle atrophy, and/or bladder and bowel incontinence. Additionally, injury, disease or other degenerative disorders may cause one or more of the intervertebral discs to shrink, collapse, deteriorate or become displaced, herniated, or otherwise damaged and compromised.
The surgical standard of care for treatment of herniated, displaced or ruptured intervertebral discs is fragment removal and nerve decompression without a requirement to reconstruct the annular wall. While results are currently acceptable, they are not optimal. Various authors report 3.1-21% recurrent disc herniation, representing a failure of the primary procedure and requiring re-operation for the same condition. An estimated 10% recurrence rate results in 39,000 re-operations in the United States each year.
An additional method of relieving the symptoms is thermal annuloplasty, involving the heating of sub-annular zones in the non-herniated painful disc, seeking pain relief, but making no claim of reconstruction of the ruptured, discontinuous annulus wall.
There is currently no known method of annulus reconstruction, either primarily or augmented with an annulus stent.
The present invention provides methods and related materials for reconstruction of the disc wall in cases of displaced, herniated, ruptured, or otherwise damaged intervertebral discs. In accordance with the invention, an annulus stent is disclosed for repair of an intervertebral disc annulus, comprising a centralized hub section, said hub section comprising lateral extensions from the hub section.
In an exemplary embodiment, one or more mild biodegradable surgical sutures are placed at about equal distances along the sides of a pathologic aperture in the ruptured disc wall (annulus) or along the sides of a surgical incision in the annular wall, which may be weakened or thinned.
Sutures are then tied in such fashion as to draw together the sides of the aperture, effecting reapproximation or closure of the opening, to enhance natural healing and subsequent reconstruction by natural tissue (fibroblasts) crossing the now surgically narrowed gap in the disc annulus.
A 25-30% reduction in the rate of recurrence of disc nucleus herniation through this aperture, has been achieved using this method.
In another embodiment, the method can be augmented by creating a subannular barrier in and across the aperture by placement of a patch of human muscle fascia (the membrane covering the muscle) or any other autograft, allograft, or xenograft acting as a bridge or a scaffold, providing a platform for traverse of fibroblasts or other normal cells of repair existing in and around the various layers of the disc annulus, prior to closure of the aperture.
A 30-50% reduction in the rate of recurrence of disc herniation has been achieved using the aforementioned fascial augmentation with this embodiment.
Having demonstrated that human muscle fascia is adaptable for annular reconstruction, other biocompatible membranes can be employed as a bridge, stent, patch or barrier to subsequent migration of the disc nucleus through the aperture. Such biocompatible materials may be, for example, medical grade biocompatible fabrics, biodegradable polymeric sheets, or form fitting or non-form fitting fillers for the cavity created by removal of a portion of the disc nucleus pulposus in the course of the disc fragment removal or discectomy. The prosthetic material can be placed in and around the intervertebral space, created by removal of the degenerated disc fragments.
Additional objects and advantages of the invention will be set forth in part in the description which follows, and in part will be obvious from the description, or may be learned by practice of the invention. The objects and advantages of the invention will be realized and attained by means of the elements and combinations particularly pointed out in the appended claims.
It is to be understood that both the foregoing general description and the following detailed description are exemplary and explanatory only and are not restrictive of the invention, as claimed.
The accompanying drawings, which are incorporated in and constitute a part of this specification, illustrate illustrative embodiments of the invention and, together with the description, serve to explain the principles of the invention.
Reference will now be made in detail to an illustrative embodiment of the invention, which appears in the accompanying drawings. Wherever possible, the same reference numbers will be used throughout the drawings to refer to the same or like parts.
In one embodiment of the present invention, as shown in
Additionally, to repair a weakened or thinned wall of a disc annulus 42, a surgical incision is made along the weakened or thinned region of the annulus 42 and one or more surgical sutures 40 can be placed at about equal distances laterally from the incision. Reapproximation or closure of the incision is accomplished by tying the sutures 40 so that the sides of the incision are drawn together. The reapproximation or closure of the incision enhances the natural healing and subsequent reconstruction by the natural tissue crossing the now surgically narrowed gap in the annulus 42. Preferably, the surgical sutures 40 are biodegradable, but permanent non-biodegradable materials may be utilized.
In an alternative embodiment, the method can be augmented by the placement of a patch of human muscle fascia or any other autograft, allograft or xenograft in and across the aperture 44. The patch acts as a bridge in and across the aperture 44, providing a platform for traverse of fibroblasts or other normal cells of repair existing in and around the various layers of the disc annulus 42, prior to closure of the aperture 44.
In a further embodiment, as shown in
In an illustrative embodiment, as shown in
Additionally, the upper section 14 of the centralized vertical extension 12 may be any number of different shapes, as shown in
The upper section 14 of the centralized vertical extension 12 can comprise a slot 18, where the slot 18 forms an orifice through the upper section 14. The slot 18 is positioned within the upper section 14 such that it traverses the upper section's 14 longitudinal axis. The slot 18 is of such a size and shape that sutures, tension bands, staples or any other type of fixation device known in the art may be passed through, to affix the annulus stent 10 to the disc annulus 42.
In an alternative embodiment, the upper section 14 of the centralized vertical extension 12 may be perforated. The perforated upper section 14 contains a plurality of holes that traverse the longitudinal axis of upper section 14. The perforations are of such a size and shape that sutures, tension bands, staples or any other type of fixation device known the art may be passed through, to affix the annulus stent 10 to the disc annulus 42.
The lower section 16 of the centralized vertical extension 12 can comprise a pair of lateral extensions, a left lateral extension 20 and a right lateral extension 22. The lateral extensions 20 and 22 comprise an inside edge 24, an outside edge 26, an upper surface 28, and a lower surface 30. The lateral extensions 20 and 22 can have an essentially constant thickness throughout. The inside edge 24 is attached to and is about the same length as the lower section 16. The outside edge 26 can be about 8 mm-16 mm in length. The inside edge 24 and the lower section 16 meet to form a horizontal plane, essentially perpendicular to the centralized vertical extension 12. The upper surface 28 of the lateral extensions 20 and 22 can form an angle from about 0°-60° below the horizontal plane, thereby forming an opening or recess 23 in the annulus stent 10. The width of the annulus stent 10 may be from about 3 mm-5 mm.
Additionally, the upper surface 28 of the lateral extensions 20 and 22 may be barbed for fixation to the inside surface of the disc annulus 42 and to resist expulsion through the aperture 44.
In an alternative embodiment, as shown in
In an illustrative embodiment, the annulus stent 10 is a solid unit, formed from one or more of the flexible resilient biocompatible or bioresorbable materials well know in the art.
For example, the annulus stent 10 may be made from: a porous matrix or mesh of biocompatible and bioresorbable fibers acting as a scaffold to regenerate disc tissue and replace annulus fibrosus as disclosed in, for example, U.S. Pat. No. 5,108,438 (Stone) and U.S. Pat. No. 5,258,043 (Stone), a strong network of inert fibers intermingled with a bioresorbable (or bioabsorbable) material which attracts tissue ingrowth as disclosed in, for example, U.S. Pat. No, 4,904,260 (Ray et al.); a biodegradable substrate as disclosed in, for example, U.S. Pat. No. 5,964,807 (Gan at al.); or an expandable polytetrafluoroethylene (ePTFE), as used for conventional vascular grafts, such as those sold by W. L. Gore and Associates, Inc. under the trademarks GORE-TEX and PRECLUDE, or by Impra, Inc. under the trademark IMPRA.
Furthermore, the annulus stent 10, may contain hygroscopic material for a controlled limited expansion of the annulus stent 10 to fill the evacuated disc space cavity.
Additionally, the annulus stent 10 may comprise materials to facilitate regeneration of disc tissue, such as bioactive silica-based materials that assist in regeneration of disc tissue as disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 5,849,331 (Ducheyne, et al.), or other tissue growth factors well known in the art.
In further embodiments, as shown in FIGS. 5AB-6AB, the left and right lateral extensions 20 and 22 join to form a solid pyramid or cone. Additionally, the left and right lateral extensions 20 and 22 may form a solid trapezoid, wedge, or bullet shape. The solid formation may be a solid biocompatible or bioresorbable flexible material, allowing the lateral extensions 20 and 22 to be compressed for insertion into aperture 44, then to expand conforming to the shape of the annulus' 42 inner wall.
Alternatively, a compressible core may be attached to the lower surface 30 of the lateral extensions 20 and 22, forming a pyramid, cone, trapezoid, wedge, or bullet shape. The compressible core may be made from one of the biocompatible or bioresorbable resilient foams well known in the art. The core can also comprise a fluid-expandable membrane, e.g., a balloon. The compressible core allows the lateral extensions 20 and 22 to be compressed for insertion into aperture 44, then to expand conforming to the shape of the annulus' 42 inner wall and to the cavity created by pathologic extrusion or surgical removal of the disc fragment.
In an illustrative method of use, as shown in
In an alternative method, where the length of the aperture 44 is less than the length of the outside edge 26 of the annulus stent 10, the annulus stent 10 can be inserted laterally into the aperture 44. The lateral extensions 20 and 22 are compressed, and the annulus stent 10 can then be laterally inserted into the aperture 44. The annulus stent 10 can then be rotated inside the disc annulus 42, such that the upper section 14 can be held back through the aperture 44. The lateral extensions 20 and 22 are then allowed to expand, with the upper surface 28 contouring to the inside surface of the disc annulus 42. The upper section 14 can be positioned within, or proximate to, the aperture 44 in the subannular space such that the annulus stent 10 may be secured to the disc annulus, using means well known in the art.
In an alternative method of securing the annulus stent 10 in the aperture 44, as shown in
It is anticipated that fibroblasts will engage the fibers of the polymer or fabric of the intervertebral disc stent 10, forming a strong wall duplicating the currently existing condition of healing seen in the normal reparative process.
In an additional embodiment, as shown in
In an alternative embodiment, the membrane 64 is made of a semi-permeable biocompatible material.
In an illustrative embodiment, a hydrogel is injected into the internal cavity 62 of the flexible bladder 60. A hydrogel is a substance formed when an organic polymer (natural or synthetic) is cross-linked via, covalent, ionic, or hydrogen bonds to create a three-dimensional open-lattice structure, which entraps water molecules to form a gel. The hydrogel may be used in either the hydrated or dehydrated form.
In a method of use, where the annulus stent 10 has been inserted into the aperture 44, as has been previously described and shown in
The surgical repair of an intervertebral disc may require the removal of the entire disc nucleus, being replaced with an implant, or the removal of a portion of the disc nucleus thereby leaving a void in the intervertebral disc cavity. The flexible bladder 60 allows for the removal of only the damaged section of the disc nucleus, with the expanded flexible bladder 60 filling the resultant void in the intervertebral disc cavity. A major advantage of the annulus stent 10 with the flexible bladder 60 is that the incision area in the annulus 42 can be reduced in size, as there is no need for the insertion of an implant into the intervertebral disc cavity.
In an alternative method of use, a dehydrated hydrogel is injected into the internal cavity 62 of the flexible bladder 60. Fluid, from the disc nucleus, passes through the semipermeable membrane 64 hydrating the dehydrated hydrogel. As the hydrogel absorbs the fluid the flexible bladder 60 expands, filling the void in the intervertebral disc cavity.
All patents referred to or cited herein are incorporated by reference in their entirety to the extent they are not inconsistent with the explicit teachings of this specification, including; U.S. Pat. No. 5,108,438 (Stone), U.S. Pat. No. 5,258,043 (Stone), U.S. Pat. No. 4,904,260 (Ray et al.), U.S. Pat. No. 5,964,807 (Gan et al.), U.S. Pat. No. 5,849,331 (Ducheyne et al.), U.S. Pat. No. 5,122,154 (Rhodes),.U.S. Pat. No. 5,204,106 (Schepers at al.), U.S. Pat. No. 5,888,220 (Felt et al.) and U.S. Pat. No. 5,376,120 (Sarver et al.).
It should be understood that the examples and embodiments described herein are for illustrative purposes only and that various modifications or changes in light thereof will be suggested to persons skilled in the art and are to be included within the spirit and preview of this application and the scope of the appended claims.
This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/985,735, filed Nov. 10, 2004, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/085,040, filed Mar. 1, 2002, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/947,078, filed Sep. 5, 2001, now U.S. Pat. No. 6,592,625 which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/484,706, filed Jan. 18, 2000, now abandoned which claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/160,710, filed Oct. 20, 1999. The entire contents of each of the above are incorporated herein by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4520821 | Schmidt | Jun 1985 | A |
5152303 | Allen | Oct 1992 | A |
5207695 | Trout | May 1993 | A |
5350399 | Erlebacher | Sep 1994 | A |
5397991 | Rogers | Mar 1995 | A |
5411520 | Nash et al. | May 1995 | A |
5861004 | Kensey | Jan 1999 | A |
5888222 | Coates | Mar 1999 | A |
6132465 | Ray et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6183515 | Barlow et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6245107 | Ferree | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6261296 | Aebi et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6464712 | Epstein | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6506204 | Mazzocchi | Jan 2003 | B2 |
6696073 | Boyce | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6726696 | Houser | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6783546 | Zucherman | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6805695 | Keith | Oct 2004 | B2 |
7033393 | Gainor | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7128073 | Van Der Burg | Oct 2006 | B1 |
20020077701 | Kuslich | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020082698 | Parenteau | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020147461 | Aldrich | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20030040796 | Ferree | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030074075 | Thomas | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030195514 | Trieu | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20040039392 | Trieu | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040054414 | Trieu | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040092969 | Kumar | May 2004 | A1 |
20040097980 | Ferree | May 2004 | A1 |
20040138703 | Alleyne | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040210310 | Trieu | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040260397 | Lambrecht et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050033440 | Lambrecht et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050038519 | Lambrecht et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050060038 | Lambrecht et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20060060038 | Cauthen | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060129156 | Cauthen | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060167553 | Cauthen | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060173545 | Cauthen | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060195193 | Bloemer | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060247776 | Kim | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060282167 | Lambrecht | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070067040 | Ferree | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070100349 | O'Neil | May 2007 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
4323595 | Jul 1994 | DE |
0 020 021 | Dec 1980 | EP |
0 025 706 | Mar 1981 | EP |
0 042 953 | Jan 1982 | EP |
0 049 978 | Apr 1982 | EP |
0 061 037 | Sep 1982 | EP |
0 062 832 | Oct 1982 | EP |
0 076 409 | Apr 1983 | EP |
0 110 316 | Jun 1984 | EP |
0 112 107 | Jun 1984 | EP |
0 121 246 | Oct 1984 | EP |
0 122 902 | Oct 1984 | EP |
0 126 570 | Nov 1984 | EP |
0 145 577 | Jun 1985 | EP |
0 193 784 | Sep 1986 | EP |
0 195 818 | Oct 1986 | EP |
2054383 | Feb 1981 | GB |
WO 9116867 | Nov 1991 | WO |
WO 9423671 | Oct 1994 | WO |
WO 9522285 | Aug 1995 | WO |
WO 9531946 | Nov 1995 | WO |
WO 9531948 | Nov 1995 | WO |
WO 9627339 | Sep 1996 | WO |
WO 9720874 | Jun 1997 | WO |
WO 9726847 | Jul 1997 | WO |
WO 9801091 | Jan 1998 | WO |
WO 9805274 | Feb 1998 | WO |
WO 9822050 | May 1998 | WO |
WO 9820939 | Sep 1998 | WO |
WO 9900074 | Jan 1999 | WO |
WO 9902108 | Jan 1999 | WO |
WO 9904720 | Feb 1999 | WO |
WO 9916381 | Aug 1999 | WO |
WO 9961084 | Dec 1999 | WO |
WO 0020021 | Apr 2000 | WO |
WO 0025706 | May 2000 | WO |
WO 0042953 | Jul 2000 | WO |
WO 0049978 | Aug 2000 | WO |
WO 0061037 | Oct 2000 | WO |
WO 0062832 | Oct 2000 | WO |
WO 0076409 | Dec 2000 | WO |
WO 0110316 | Feb 2001 | WO |
WO 0112107 | Feb 2001 | WO |
WO 0121246 | Mar 2001 | WO |
WO 0122902 | Apr 2001 | WO |
WO 0126570 | Apr 2001 | WO |
WO 0128464 | Apr 2001 | WO |
WO 0145577 | Jun 2001 | WO |
WO 0193784 | Dec 2001 | WO |
WO 0195818 | Dec 2001 | WO |
WO 0217825 | Mar 2002 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20070061012 A1 | Mar 2007 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60160710 | Oct 1999 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 10985735 | Nov 2004 | US |
Child | 11521473 | US | |
Parent | 10085040 | Mar 2002 | US |
Child | 10985735 | US | |
Parent | 09947078 | Sep 2001 | US |
Child | 10085040 | US | |
Parent | 09484706 | Jan 2000 | US |
Child | 09947078 | US |