Intervertebral disc prosthesis, surgical methods, and fitting tools

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 9333095
  • Patent Number
    9,333,095
  • Date Filed
    Monday, February 4, 2008
    16 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, May 10, 2016
    8 years ago
Abstract
An intervertebral disc prosthesis designed to be substituted for fibrocartilaginous discs ensures a connection between the vertebra of the vertebra column or the end of the latter. The prosthesis includes a pair of plates spaced from each other by a nucleus. The prosthesis has increased stability by providing the nucleus with a translation or rotation stop, or by inducing an angular correction between its plates contacting vertebra, or a combination of these characteristics. The stop includes parts external to the nucleus and contact surfaces perpendicular to their contact directions. Surgical methods and instrumentation for implanting the prosthesis are also described.
Description
BACKGROUND

The present invention concerns an intervertebral disc prosthesis designed to be substituted for fibrocartilaginous discs ensuring connection between the vertebra of the vertebral column or the end of the latter.


The intervertebral discs are formed from a deformable but noncompressible element called “nucleus pulposus” containing approximately 80% water, surrounded by several elastic fibrous layers converging to maintain the nucleus, absorb part of the forces applied to the entire disc and stabilize the articulation. These elements may often be broken down or damaged by compression, displacement or wear and tear, following shocks, infections, exaggerated forces or simply over time.


The breakdown of this articulation element may cause intense pain and significant constraint in the patient. Beyond the surgery that consisted of blocking the deficient articulation and possibly purely and simply removing the damaged disc, a therapeutic route for the last twenty or so years consists of surgically replacing the defective disc with a functional prosthesis. However, the use of such a prosthesis requires a device that is not very cumbersome, that supports significant forces, or has a great sturdiness over time. Furthermore, the comfort of the patients already affected by great and acute pain makes it desirable to arrange for a prosthesis that most faithfully reproduces the natural possibilities of movements and at the same time ensures the best stability possibility to the spinal column that is sometimes already damaged.


The use of such a prosthesis therefore crucially depends on the stability that it allows the spinal column, as much during movements as during static forces or lengthy constant position.


A certain number of prostheses have been proposed with a compressible material base, with the goal of reproducing the kinematics of natural movement while reproducing its components and their characteristics of shape or plasticity, as described in the patent FR 2 124 815 which proposes a disc from elastomer material reinforced by a textile material. These devices present the drawback of a lifetime that is often too limited and also suffer from drawbacks indeed due to this elasticity. In fact, since the prosthesis is entirely compressible, a progressive sliding of the prosthesis may be produced relative to the vertebra between which it is placed, which too often leads it to leave its housing. The addition of anchoring pins does not allow sufficient remedy for this problem, because the micromovements permitted by the compressibility of the material of the prosthesis also include a vertical component, which too easily allows the pins to leave their housing with each movement.


Among the prostheses nor resting on the deformation of materials, a type of prosthesis frequently used is described by the patent DE 30 23 353 and is formed of a nucleus with the shape of a biconvex lens forming articulation between two plates each presenting a cavity with a shape approximately complementary to the nucleus in their centre and on their perimeter a shoulder retaining this nucleus. This arrangement presents the advantage by comparison to a more limited ball-and-socket joint of using significant contact surface, which largely decreases the wear and tear.


To incline one with the other on one side, the plates are articulated by their internal cavity on the edge of the nucleus of the side in question, but according to a rotation movement which, on the other side makes their edges move apart more than they were at rest. This separating has a tendency to detach the vertebral plates on which they are supported, which damages the surface of the vertebra at the sites where the plates have just anchored and again allows progressive displacement with risk of complete ejection of the prosthesis.


Another type of prosthesis described in patent FR 2 659 226 consists of an upper plate presenting a concave face that comes to slide on a nucleus in the form of a segment of a sphere, this nucleus being immobilized in a cavity of the lower plate. In this case, the rotation is done more satisfactorily from the point of view of space of the plates, but the sliding of the upper plate on a sphere whose centre is located on the exterior of the prosthesis also causes lateral displacement which may be harmful as much to the kinematics of movement as to the organs present in the vicinity.


A solution is proposed in the patent FR 2 730 159 in the form of a nucleus presenting two spherical faces, oriented in the same direction, and with different radius. The nucleus with cylindrical exterior slides on a convex surface belonging the lower plate and itself presents a convex surface on the top, on which the upper plate slides. Because the nucleus is movable horizontally, it is in a position to move apart from one side when the plates approach the other. However, this device presents the drawback of risking the complete ejection of the nucleus outside the prosthesis, this drawback also existing in the device described by the patent DE 30 23 353).


In the goal of limiting the risks of ejection of the nucleus, the patents WO 00 53 127, as well as U.S. Pat. No. 5,401,269 and U.S. Pat. No. 4,759,766 propose to provide a translation stop, produced in different ways.


In certain variants, a translation stop is disclosed in the form of a relief protruding from one contact surface of the nucleus and movable in a recess in the plate or inversely. This type of internal stop is therefore located on the interior of a contact or support surface between nucleus and plate, and therefore decreases the available surface considerably. This decrease in support surface increases the stresses undergone by the materials, therefore the risks of wear and tear or strain in creep or exceeding elastic limits. The separation between the support surface and housing receiving the stop may also risk marking the piece which is supported above and damaging the latter.


In certain cases, such a central stop is provided with a noncircular shape, which in a certain extent allows the rotations of the nucleus to be limited relative to the plate that provides it. However, this noncircular forms additional constraint which again limits the surface available for support. Furthermore, the angles of this shape themselves form fragile zones, which only ensures low sturdiness to this stop operation in rotation.


In other variants, a collar protrudes from the nucleus and surrounds it in the space between the two plates. In its exterior part this collar widens at a certain height along the axis of the spinal column towards each of the plates, which forms two interior borders that may be supported on the exterior border of contact surfaces of these same plates. However, this type of external peripheral stop presents certain drawbacks, in particular in terms of obstruction.


In fact, the configuration of this collar represents considerable vertical obstruction (along the spinal column axis) and the contact surfaces of the plates must also present a certain height to be able to stop this collar in translation. Furthermore, the peripheral shape of this type of stop also occupies considerable radial space, in particular in a section plane where the spinal column presents the smallest width, as in sagittal plane. Given the limited space available in the disc, or intervertebral, space, this obstruction may occupy a space that would be useful for the configuration of the rest of the prosthesis, which may limit the results in terms of kinematics or reliability.


Moreover, this type of external peripheral stop requires a nucleus with biconvex shape to be used, to allow for provision of sufficient height for the contact surfaces of the plates to form an exterior border usable by this stop. Therefore, this type of stop is difficult to produce for a nucleus presenting one or more concave surfaces, while such forms of nucleus may allow the kinematics of the prosthesis to be made more comfortable with use by the patient.


In the case where the contact surfaces between nucleus and plates are not circular, such a collar may also be able to limit the clearance in rotation of the nucleus relative to the plates, for example by peripheral contact between two concentric ellipses and with different radii. However, such contact is done according to a very tight angle between the surfaces being supported on each other, which makes the position of this limit not very precise and increases the risks of wear and tear or blockage by clamping. Furthermore, the clearance in rotation permitted by such kinematics is directly dependent on the clearance permitted in translation, and may not be chosen independently of the latter during design of the prosthesis.


SUMMARY

A goal of the invention is to propose a prosthesis allowing the spinal column better stability by a greater precision and sturdiness in relative positions of pieces that compose it.


This goal is reached by a vertebral prosthesis device according to claim 1.


Moreover to ensure stability of the spinal column after fitting such a prosthesis, the damages undergone by the spinal column because of the different pathologies leading to deciding to fit a prosthesis sometimes make useful the re-establishing of stability or posture that the elasticity of the spinal column no longer allows to be provided. According to the pathologies and the history of the patient, it may then be indicated to induce a certain angular correction in the configuration of the intervertebral space for example in the sense of lordosis or that of kyphosis.


Certain types of existing prostheses use a variation in thickness of one of the plates to induce such a correction. Such a correction is not however always very stable, in particular because the position of supports of the nucleus on the plates varies too much during movements.


Another goal of the invention is therefore to propose a prosthesis allowing the prosthesis better stability by the re-establishment of posture adapted to the kinematics of movements that it produces.


This goal is reached by a vertebral prosthesis device according to claim 5.


Additional developments of the invention are described in the dependent claims.


The invention with its characteristics and advantages will be more clearly evident with reading the description made in reference to the attached drawings in which:





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS


FIG. 1 represents an exploded view in perspective of a prosthesis according to the invention, in a version including a convex lower plate and providing a central and annular stop;



FIG. 2 represents an exploded sectional view of a prosthesis device according to the invention in the same variant;



FIG. 3 represents an exploded sectional view of the prosthesis device according to the invention in a variant including a nucleus with flat lower surface and lower plate presenting an annular stop;



FIG. 4 represents an exploded sectional side view of the prosthesis device according to the invention in a variant including a nucleus with concave lower face, an added block and a lower plate with annular stop;



FIG. 6a represents a sectional side view of the prosthesis device according to the invention in a variant with central, annular and incline stop, in maximum incline position;



FIG. 6b represents a sectional side view of a prosthesis according to the prior arts where the nucleus presents a fixed position;



FIG. 6c represents a sectional side view of a prosthesis according to the prior arts where the nucleus is movable and is ejected under the load during a force in the maximum incline position;



FIG. 5 represents a sectional exploded side view of the prosthesis device according to a variant including an added block allowing a central stop to appear and a flat lower plate presenting an annular stop;



FIG. 7 represents a sectional side view of the prosthesis device according to a variant without annular stop and where the central stop presents a vertical section in the form of a dovetail, in maximum incline position;



FIGS. 8a and 8b represent sectional side views of the prosthesis device according to the invention according to a variant with inclined axis, including an annular stop and a central stop incorporated in the contact surface supporting the nucleus, in the case of a single piece lower plate and an added block, respectively.



FIG. 8c represents a sectional side view in a sagittal plane of the prosthesis device according to the invention according to a variant with a corrective nucleus presenting two faces in which the contact surfaces are not parallel;



FIG. 9a represents a perspective view of the prosthesis device according to the invention according to a variant with two stops exterior to the nucleus, held in a housing between pillars integral with the lower plate;



FIG. 9b represents a perspective view of the prosthesis device according to the invention according to a variant with two stops exterior to the nucleus, each holding a pillar integral with the lower plate between its arms;



FIG. 10 represents a perspective view of a device according to the invention for fitting such a prosthesis;



FIG. 11 represents a perspective view of a device according to the invention for inserting such a prosthesis, in position during the introduction laterally of the prosthesis between two vertebrae;



FIG. 12 represents a perspective view of an assembly tool with an insertion guide according to an embodiment of the invention;



FIG. 13 represents a perspective view of a prosthesis according to the invention, presented at the entrance of the insertion guide of the invention;



FIG. 14 represents a perspective view of the instrumentation according to an embodiment of the invention when the prosthesis is ready to be impacted in the disc space.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION

A prosthesis according to the prior art disclosed by the patent FR 2 659 226, consisting of a concave upper plate (3AA) sliding on a nucleus (2AA) presenting a spherical upper cap (23M) itself immobilized in a housing of the lower plate (1AA), is represented in FIG. 6b; in horizontal position and in maximum incline position. Because the centre of the sphere (csAA) providing the contact surface with the nucleus is located outside this same upper plate (3AA), its incline is combined with considerable lateral displacement (d1). This displacement creates a break in the continuity of the vertical profile of the vertebral column which may hamper the overall functionality of the movement and risk damaging the tissues surrounding the vertebrae, such as ligaments and spinal marrow, which may be immediately or in the long run.


A prosthesis according to the prior art disclosed by the patent FR 2 730 159, represented in FIG. 6c, consists of a movable nucleus with two spherical surfaces oriented in the same direction, that may be laterally displaced between two plates and may allow incline without lateral displacement. In the extreme position, however, the nucleus is only kept on the exterior side by the furthest border of the spherical surface of the upper plate. Since this edge itself is already raised, there is a great risk that too high a vertical pressure or a horizontal parasitic force causes ejection of the nucleus towards the exterior of the prosthesis, causing intense pain and risks of immediate damage for the tissues surrounding the vertebral column, such as ligaments or spinal marrow.


In an embodiment represented in FIG. 6a, a prosthesis according to the invention consists of a lower plate (1) being articulated with an upper plate (3) around a nucleus (2) presenting two spherical sliding surfaces with the same orientation on both faces. The lower surface (21) of the nucleus (2) is concave and slides on a complementary convex surface (12) provided by the upper face, known as internal, of the lower plate (1). The upper surface (23) is convex and slides on a complementary concave surface (32) provided by the lower face, known as internal, of the upper plate (3). In this embodiment, the radius of the lower contact surface (21) of the nucleus (2) is a radius greater then that of its convex upper surface (23), the centres of the spheres providing its two contact surfaces being located on the same axis of symmetry (d2) of these two surfaces. On their side, the two plates present contact surfaces (12, 32) the axes of symmetry (d12, d32) of which are perpendicular to their external faces (10, 30). The horizontal displacement part of the nucleus in one direction, due to the rotation on the upper sliding surface around its centre (cs), is compensated by a rotation of the nucleus on its lower sliding surface around its centre (ci) which induces horizontal displacement of the nucleus (2) and therefore of the centre (cs) of the upper sliding surface. The radii of the two spheres providing these sliding surfaces (12, 21, 23, 32) are determined so as to modify the lateral displacement of the plates by comparison with each other during their incline. In one embodiment, the radii of these sliding surfaces (12, 21, 23, 32) may be chosen so that the movement of the plate is reduced to an incline accompanied with a possible vertical component but without horizontal displacement of the upper plate relative to the lower plate.


To avoid any risk of ejection of the nucleus (2) during forces in the inclined position, the latter is kept in its clearance by a central stop, formed for example by a cylindrical block (4) protruding from the convex surface of the lower plate and cooperating with edges of a recess (22) arranged in the centre of the contact surface (21) of the lower concave surface of the nucleus.


In one embodiment (FIG. 6a) the lower plate also presents on its upper face an approximately cylindrical cavity (11) in which the edges (112) protrude from the contact surface (12) with the nucleus (2), and cooperate with the approximately cylindrical perimeter (20) of this nucleus to ensure an operation of annular stop for it while limiting its movement towards the exterior of the contact surface (12) that provides it.


In one embodiment (FIG. 6a) the internal surfaces of the plates, on their parts (113, 331) exterior to the sliding surfaces, present a form capable of cooperating among themselves to limit by stop the incline of the plates with each other at a determined angle (a1).


In one embodiment represented in FIG. 7, the stop (4) is provided by the convex surface (12) of the lower plate (1) and presents approximately the shape of an inverted cone, that is, its section is greater in its end (42) opposite the surface (12) that provides it. By presenting an undercut shape, the interior surface (224) of the recess (22) cooperates with the exterior surface (40) of the stop (4) to limit the raising of the nucleus when the latter is in furthest position against this stop (4).


According to the criteria connected for example to the resistance of the materials, to the wear and tear or to the kinematics sought, the different shapes and dimensions intervening in the stop mechanisms, for example exterior (FIGS. 9a and 9b), annular, central or incline, could be determined so as to coordinate the order of arrival at stop of the different parts. These shapes and dimensions could be determined for example, so that the pieces reach stop at the same stage of movement, for example determined by angular incline (a1) between the lower (1) and upper (3) plates.


In an embodiment illustrated in FIGS. 7 and 8a, the annular stop operation is used very little or not at all, which allows the vertical obstruction of the prosthesis to be decreased.


In an embodiment presented in FIG. 3, the lower surface (21a) of the nucleus (2) may be approximately flat, and then slide on a contact surface (12a) of the lower plate (1), also approximately flat. In this embodiment, the flatness of the contact surface (12a) of the lower plate allows the edges (112) of this plate that protrude from this surface to be particularly effective in their role of annular stop. Therefore, it is possible to manage without the central stop and thus to increase the common contact surface between the lower plate and the nucleus, which on the one hand, decreases the wear and tear of the pieces and on the other hand, the risk of marking the surface of the plate with placement of the contour of the recess (22, FIG. 6a) in which is accommodated the central stop (4, FIG. 6a) in other embodiments.


In an embodiment represented in FIG. 4, the lower plate (1) presents an approximately cylindrical cavity (11) on its upper face the flat bottom (15) of which receives an intermediate piece called block (5). This piece is immobilized in the cavity (11) for example by the edges (112) of this cavity and presents on its upper face a convex surface (52) on which the lower concave surface (21) of the nucleus slides. This embodiment with the convex surface (52) on which the nucleus slides for example allows the good qualities of the surface necessary for the fluidity of movement and longevity of the prosthesis to be obtained more easily and at less cost. It also allows several models to be provided with blocks (5), of different shapes or qualities, that can be chosen in advance or at the time of the surgery according to applications with the same model of lower plate.


In an embodiment represented in FIG. 5, the lower plate (1) receives a block (5) in an approximately cylindrical cavity (11) presenting a vertical perforation that the stop (4) integral with the lower plate crosses. On its upper surface, this block supports a convex surface (52), on which the nucleus (2) and upper plate stack rests.


As a variant, the stop (4) may be integral with the block (5) on its convex contact surface (52)(FIG. 8b).


Within the goal of obtaining at rest a corrective effect of the relative position of two vertebrae, the prosthesis may be produced in a variant where the axes of symmetry of the contact surfaces (12, 15, 52, 21, 23, 32) or support (10, 30) of one or more pieces are not merged. The pressure (F) exerted by the vertebrae on the two plates in the directions perpendicular to their external surfaces (10, 30) will then have the tendency to induce and continuously maintain an incline (a3, FIGS. 8a, 8b et 8c) between these plates (1, 3), that is not zero, for example in the sense of lordosis.


An embodiment of such a variant is represented in FIG. 8a where the axis of symmetry (d12) of the contact surface (12) of the lower plate (1) forms an angle (a2) determined with a direction (d10) perpendicular to the external surface of this same lower plate, while the axis of symmetry (d32) of the internal contact face (32) of the upper plate (3) is perpendicular to the external surface (30) of this same upper plate (3). The lower contact surface of the upper plate (3) presents an axis of symmetry parallel to a direction perpendicular to the support surface (30) of the ¶ of this same upper plate (3).


In another variant according to the same principle represented in FIG. 8b, a device is used that includes a lower plate (1) providing a block (5) the upper contact surface of which (52) presents an axis of symmetry (d52) forming an angle (a2) determined with a direction (d51) perpendicular to its lower face (51). The internal contact surfaces (15, 32) of the lower (1) and upper (3) plates present axes of symmetry perpendicular to the support surface (10, 30) of their respective external faces. Thus, at the time of the surgery it is possible to choose between several blocks (5) with different inclines, according to the desired degree of correction. This block (5) could be maintained fixed around an axis perpendicular to the lower plate (1) by any known means (not represented) such as wedge, grooves or complementary accidents of shape between the block (5) and the lower plate (1) that provides it.


In another variant according to the same principle, represented in FIG. 8c, it is the nucleus (2) that presents two contact surfaces (21, 23) the axes of symmetry of which (d21, d23) form a determined angle (a2) between them. The internal contact surfaces (12, 32) of the lower (1) and upper (3) plates present axes of symmetry perpendicular to the support surface (10, 30) of their respective external faces. The angular correction (a3) induced by the nucleus (2) could then be kept constantly in the desired direction relative to the body of the patient by a rotation stop mechanism (not represented in FIG. 8c) of this same nucleus, such a mechanism being described later (FIGS. 9a and 9b).


In one embodiment the device according to the invention presents an exterior stop mechanism, located outside the perimeter of the contact surfaces of the nucleus (2).


In a variant represented in FIG. 9a, this mechanism is formed of two protruding parts (6) protruding from the cylindrical exterior surface of the perimeter of the nucleus (2) in opposite directions. Each of these protruding parts is held in a housing (162) delimited by two pillars (161) integral with the lower plate (1). These pillars cooperate with the protruding part (6) or with the surface (20) of the perimeter of the nucleus or both for limiting the movements of this same nucleus in translation as in rotation parallel said plate. The housing is sufficiently large to allow small displacements of the nucleus required for the kinematics of the device, while being sufficiently narrow so that this same nucleus and the lower plate are adjacent in certain positions, for example, positions of maximum incline of the spinal column. The protruding part (6) or perimeter surface (20) of the nucleus (2) then cooperates with the pillars (161) of the lower plate to retain this same nucleus and avoid any lateral ejection.


The pillars (161) present a larger section at the end than at the base, thus limiting the raising of the nucleus.


In another operating variant according to the same principle and represented in FIG. 9b, this mechanism is formed of two protruding parts (6) protruding from the cylindrical exterior surface (20) of the perimeter of the nucleus (2) in opposite directions. Each of these protruding parts presents two arms delimiting a housing (66) which hold a pillar (163) integral with the lower plate (1). The pillars (163) present a larger section at their end than at their base.


These embodiments of stop (9a and 9b) may allow the central stop to be disposed of and to thus increase the contact surfaces which decreases the wear and tear. These types of stop (6) are also particularly valuable because of the limitation of the movements of the nucleus in rotation along an axis approximately parallel to the axis of the spinal column. In fact, this limitation makes it possible to use a corrective nucleus in which the contact surfaces present axes of symmetry that are not parallel, while maintaining in them the correction in a constant direction relative to the body of the patient.


In an embodiment represented in FIG. 6a, the lower (1) and upper (3) plates receive means for bony anchoring on their external face, designed to immobilize the prosthesis between the vertebrae or adjacent elements of the spinal column. These anchoring means may be pins (8) or wings presenting a small cross section at their end away from the plate that provides them. These pins then are embedded or are impacted by punching in the material of the bony elements (V) between which the prosthesis is fitted, for example under the effect of the pressure exerted by the ligaments when the tools are withdrawn, the tools that kept the vertebrae separated. Driving in the pins in the material of the bony element (V, FIG. 6) then prevents the prosthesis from sliding outside its site.


In an embodiment represented in FIG. 1, the plates (1, 3) present one or more accidents of shape such as notches (7) or perforations (not represented) enabling catching of a grasping tool to remove the prosthesis from its site in case of need. The lower plate (1) presents a convex upper contact surface (12) providing a central stop (4) and a cavity presenting edges (112) forming an annular stop.


In an embodiment represented in FIG. 10, an insertion device according to the invention is presented in the form of an element (9) called insertion guide, presenting an internal channel (90) approximately rectangular in section in which the prosthesis (P) can slide. This channel (9) is formed from two semi-guides (91, 92) with a cross section in the shape of a “U”, arranged inversely and fitted into each other. At one of the ends, this guide (9) presents one or more parts called support blocks or edges (910, 920) protruding along its longitudinal axis (d9). These support blocks (910, 920) form an extension of the walls of the channel called vertical (9) that form the small sides of the rectangular section of the channel (9).


In an application method illustrated in FIGS. 10 and 11, the fitting of the prosthesis device according to the invention is carried out according to the following steps:


separating the vertebrae with the aid of known instruments, for example distraction tools;


sliding the insertion guide (9) around the distraction tools so as to introduce the support edges (910, 920) between the vertebrae (V);


release and extraction of the distraction tools, the vertebrae being kept spread apart by the support edges of the insertion guide;


introduction of the prosthesis ready for fitting into the channel, and sliding to near the spinal column;


adjustment of the incline of the prosthesis according to conformation of the space available between the vertebrae with possible separating of the two parts (91, 92) of the channel according to a corresponding angle (a9) to help with this adjustment;


positioning of the prosthesis in the intervertebral space by pushing by the interior of the channel;


extraction of the support blocks (910, 920) of the channel outside the intervertebral space and impacting blocks for bony anchoring in the vertebrae (V).


In an embodiment illustrated in FIGS. 12a to 14, the instrumentation used for fitting the prosthesis according to the invention comprises an insertion guide (93) provided with an internal channel (90). This channel (90) presents an approximately rectangular cross section, or with a shape approximately complementary to the exterior profile of the prosthesis. This internal channel (90) is provided with dimensions and shape adequate for allowing the prosthesis to pass and to guide from one of its ends to the other, in a position and along a displacement approximately parallel to the external faces of its plates (1, 3). According to the applications, the channel (90) of the insertion guide (93) may include scallops in its walls opposite plates of the prosthesis. Such scallops make it possible to allow the anchoring means (8, 81) to pass provided by the plates of the prosthesis, while guiding the latter sufficiently precisely in the channel. In the embodiment illustrated here these scallops have the shape of grooves (934, 936) along the axis (d9) of the channel provided by the internal walls of the channel opposite plates (1, 3).


At one of its ends, called the working end, the walls (931, 932) of the channel (90) perpendicular to the plates of the prosthesis, that is, located in the plane containing the axis of the spinal column, are extended along the axis (d9) of this channel over a distance determined so as to protrude relative to the walls of this same channel that are parallel to the plates of the prosthesis. Since these extensions thus form the protruding parts, or support edges, that may be inserted in the intervertebral space to maintain the separation of the plates from the two vertebrae surrounding this space.


The height of these support edges (931, 932) is determined so as to maintain adequate space for allowing the introduction of the prosthesis and its anchoring means (8, 81), according to the method of anchoring provided. If the anchoring means are formed from sockets (8) or wings (81) before being introduced freely in the space, the support edges will have sufficient height to allow the height of these sockets or wings to pass. If the anchoring means are formed from wings having to penetrate the vertebral plates by a hollowed trench in the surface of these plates and opening laterally, the height of these support edges could be sufficiently low to allow the height of the prosthesis to pass but not the wings.


During surgery for fitting such a prosthesis, the surgeon begins by removing the vertebral disc or its debris, and then uses distraction tools to increase the disc space available between the two vertebrae having to receive the prosthesis. Such tools are often formed with an elongated handle providing a flat part at the end. This flat end is introduced between the vertebrae, then it is made to pivot to increase the separation of the vertebrae.


In the instrument according to the invention, the internal channel (90) of the insertion guide (93) is provided to be able to be threaded around such distraction tools, once they are in place between the vertebrae. Once brought near the spinal column while surrounding the distraction tools, the insertion guide is pushed so as to introduce its edges (931, 932) between the vertebrae, in a plane approximately parallel to the spinal column. The distraction tools may then be removed from the spinal column by making them slide in the channel (90) of the insertion guide, while the height of the support edges preserves sufficient space between the vertebrae to allow fitting of the prosthesis. In the embodiment illustrated here, the insertion guide (93) presents means for interlocking with a guide assembly tool (94), used to bring it near the spinal column and facilitating its fitting. This guide assembly tool (94) is also usable for removing the insertion guide and its support edges, and allowing the vertebrae to tighten on the prosthesis, once the latter is in place.


Such a guide assembly tool (94) is illustrated in FIGS. 12a and 12b. This tool (94) consists of two elongated tubes (941, 946) articulated to each other by means (945) located at one end, called assembling, of this tool. These two elongated tubes at their end located opposite the assembling end, each provide interlocking means for insertion guide (93). These interlocking means may comprise, for example, a hook (942, 947) on each tube (941, 946) the opening of which is located opposite the other tube. When the guide assembly tool (94) is approached by the insertion guide (93), the fact of tightening the tubes to each other around their articulation makes it possible for each hook (942, 947) to tightly encircle a tongue (934, 936) in the shape of a “T” protruding on each groove (933, 935) of the insertion guide. Within and in the axis of each tube (941, 946) is found a rod (943, 948) that may be displaced longitudinally relative to the tubes by screwing means comprising a screwing wheel (944, 949). The screwing of these wheels causes the advance of the rod in the tube and the end of the rod opposite the screwing wheel then comes to lean and block the tongue (934, 936) of the insertion guide (93) within the hook (942, 947) provided by the tube receiving this same rod. This blockage thus makes it possible to interlock the guide to its assembling tool sufficiently stably to make it possible to position said guide around the distraction tools at the spinal column.


These means (934, 936) of interlocking the insertion guide (93) or others provided by said insertion guide also make it possible to guide and interlock means of approach (95) to this insertion guide. These means (95) of approach include means for positioning the prosthesis, these means of positioning being provided to position and maintain the assembled prosthesis in a determined position relative to these means (95) of approach even in the absence of the insertion guide (93). This positioning of the prosthesis on the approach means makes it possible for the interlocking of the approach means and the insertion guide to put the prosthesis in a position making it possible for it to be easily displaced from these same means or approach up to in the internal channel (90) of the insertion guide (93). Thus, it is possible to prepare the prosthesis in the approach means (95) independently of the rest of the operation. Then it is possible to fit the insertion guide on the spinal column without being preoccupied with the prosthesis, then easily and rapidly inserting this prosthesis in the insertion guide (93) while the latter is already in position against the spinal column.


As well as illustrated in FIG. 14, these approach means (95) include two shafts (951, 952) connected to each other by articulation (955) so as to come to pinch the prosthesis (P) between two flattened parts ensuring a determined position of the prosthesis relative to these approach means. The ends of these shafts opposite the articulation including interlocking means (953, 954) capable of cooperating with the interlocking means (934, 936) of insertion guide (93) to ensure a determined position of approach means (95) relative to the insertion guide (93) as well as certain stability to this assembly. At the end of each shaft (951, 952), these interlocking means (953, 954) may in particular comprise a scalloping in which the arms come to encircle the exterior of the groove (933, 935) of the insertion guide while gliding under the upper bar of the “T” formed by the tongue (934, 936) provided by this same insertion guide.


Once the insertion guide (93) fitted instead of the distraction tools and the approach means (95) interlocked to this guide, the prosthesis is therefore in a stable position relative to the spinal column, and may be inserted in the insertion guide then slide up to the disc space. This displacement is achievable here with the aid of impacting means, or impactor (96) comprising an impacting end capable of pressing on the assembled prosthesis, distributed on both plates and without touching the nucleus. This impactor includes a central elongated part (960) that can be inserted in guiding means as an opening in the shape of a “U” provided by approach means (95) at their articulated end (955). This impactor includes another end (962) called assembling or striking, that can act to apply a continuous pressure or repeated shocks, with the hand or by any known tool or apparatus. Such an action, applied on the assembling end (962) of the impactor in the axis (d9) of the channel (90) then will be reverberated by the end (961) on the prosthesis, so as to cause its entrance then sliding in the channel (90) of the insertion guide (93), then its insertion or impaction in the intervertebral space.


In all the prosthesis devices according to the invention described here, it is necessary to understand that the distinctions of “lower plate” (represented on the bottom of the figures and referenced 1) and “upper plate” (represented on the top of the figures and referenced 3) are above all conventional, the device being able to be used in a different position, even inverse of that consisting of placing the lower plate toward the bottom of the vertebral column.


Thus, the invention proposes an intervertebral disc prosthesis device comprising at least three pieces, which parts include a plate (1) called lower and a plate (3) called upper (3) producing around at least one intermediate part called nucleus (2) an articulation by support or sliding between loadbearing surfaces (12, 15, 21, 23, 32) of said pieces, one of these pieces including at least one protruding part or accident of shape cooperating with the shape of at least one other of said pieces to form an stop limiting the possibilities of movement of the nucleus, characterized in that this stop operation uses at least one stop external to the loadbearing surfaces comprising at least one part (161, 163) protruding from at least one plate (1), located outside the loadbearing surface (12, 15) of said plate and including a face directed towards the interior of the prosthesis, this face cooperating with a peripheral part (6) of the nucleus (21, 23) situated outside its loadbearing surfaces (21, 23) and in which the surface is directed towards the exterior of the nucleus, to limit displacements of the nucleus in translation or in rotation or both in a plane approximately transverse to the spinal column.


According to a particular aspect, the loadbearing surfaces (21, 21a, 23) of the nucleus (2) in contact with the lower plate (1) and upper plate (3) present axes of symmetry (d21, d23, respectively) forming between them a determined angle (a2) that is not zero, so that a pressure (F) exerted on the two plates (1, 3) along directions perpendicular to their external surfaces induces an incline (a3) of these plates with each other.


According to a particular aspect, this external stop limits the movements in rotation of the nucleus (2) relative to at least one plate (1) by contact between parts (6, 161, 163) supporting each other by stop surfaces, this support being done along a direction approximately parallel to the normal of each of these stop surfaces.


According to a particular aspect, the external stop includes a tongue (6) protruding form the nucleus (6) which cooperates with one of the plates (1) by confining this tongue (6) in a housing (162) delimited by pillars (161) protruding from the internal race of this same plate (1) or by a recess (66) separating this tongue into two arms encircling a pillar (163) protruding from the internal face of this same plate (1), the internal face of a plate being defined at that oriented on the side of the nucleus.


According to a particular aspect, the end of at least one pillar (161, 162, 163) presents a section greater than its base, this enlargement of the pillar cooperating with the shape of the external stop tongue (6) of the nucleus (2) to limit the raising of this same nucleus relative to the plate (1) providing this pillar.


In the same spirit, the invention also proposes an intervertebral disc prosthesis device comprising at least three pieces, including a plate (1) called lower and a plate (3) called upper (3) producing around at least one intermediate element called nucleus (2) an articulation by support or sliding between loadbearing surfaces (12, 15, 21, 23, 32) of said parts, one of these parts including at least one protruding part or accident of shape cooperating with the shape of at least one other of said pairs to form an stop limiting the possibilities of movement of the nucleus, characterized in that the loadbearing surfaces (21, 21a, 23) of the nucleus (2) in contact with the lower plate (1) and upper plate (3) present axes of symmetry (d21, d23, respectively) forming between them a determined angle (a2) that is not zero so that a pressure (F) exerted on the two plate (1, 3) along directions perpendicular to their external surfaces induces an incline (a3) of these plates with each other.


According to a particular aspect this device is characterized in that the operation of the stop uses at least one stop external to the loadbearing surfaces comprising at least one part (161, 163) protruding from at least one plate (1) located outside the loadbearing surface (12, 15) of said plate and including a face directed towards the interior of the prosthesis, this face cooperating with a peripheral part (6) of the nucleus located outside its loadbearing surfaces (21, 23) and in which the surface is directed towards the exterior of the nucleus, to limit the displacements of the nucleus in translation or in rotation or both in a plane approximately transverse to the spinal column.


According to a particular aspect, when the two plates have their external faces (10, 30) parallel to each other, their loadbearing surfaces (12, 12a, 32) cooperate with the loadbearing surfaces (21, 21a, 23) of the nucleus (2) present axes of symmetry (d12, d32) forming a determined angle (a4) between them so that a pressure (F) exerted on the two plates (1, 3) along directions perpendicular to their external faces induces an incline (a5) of these plates with each other.


According to a particular aspect, the loadbearing surfaces (12, 32) provided by the internal face of the lower plate (1) and the internal face of the upper plate (3) are each in complementary contact with a supporting surface (21, 23, respectively) of the nucleus (2), and each present a shape, convex and concave, respectively, or inversely, this nucleus itself presenting a perimeter (20) approximately cylindrical along the axis of symmetry of its contact faces (21, 32).


According to a particular aspect, the internal face of the lower plate (1) presents a loadbearing surface (12a) cooperating with a loadbearing surface (21a) of the lower face of the nucleus (2), this same nucleus including on its upper face a convex loadbearing surface (23) in complementary contact with a concave loadbearing surface (32) of the internal face of the upper plate (3) the loadbearing surface (12a) of the internal face of the lower plate being sufficiently extended to allow movement of the nucleus relative to this same lower plate.


According to a particular aspect, an intermediate element called block (5) is added on the internal face of one (1) of the plates and produces an articulation with the other plate (3) around the nucleus (2) which nucleus presents a concave loadbearing surface (21) and a convex loadbearing surface (23) these two loadbearing surfaces being in contact in a complementary way with one loadbearing surface (52) of the block (5) one, and with a loadbearing surface (32) of the internal face of the plate (3) not including block, for the other.


According to a particular aspect, the axis of symmetry (d52) of the convex loadbearing surface (52) of the block (5) forms a determined angle (a4) with an axis (d51) perpendicular to its surface (51) with contact of the plate (1) so that a pressure (F) exerted on the two plates (1, 3) along directions perpendicular to their external faces induces an incline (a5) of the plates with each other.


According to a particular aspect, at least one of the loadbearing surfaces (12, 52, 21, 23, 32) allowing articulation has a shape making up part of a sphere.


According to a particular aspect, the loadbearing surfaces of the two faces of the nucleus (2) have shapes making up parts of a sphere, the face presenting a concave loadbearing surface (21) having a radius greater than that of the face presenting a convex loadbearing surface (23).


According to a particular aspect, each of the plates (1, 3) includes on its external face one or more protruding parts with small section forming a bony anchoring, these protruding parts coming to be embedded or impacted in the surface of contiguous bony elements (V) under the effect of pressure, once the prosthesis is in position between two vertebrae or bony elements.


According to a particular aspect, one or more of the pieces of the prosthesis include accidents of shape, notches (7) or perforations likely to see a tool again to facilitate the extraction of said prosthesis.


According to a particular aspect, the plates (1, 3) are composed of an alloy with base of stainless steel with cobalt-chromium and the nucleus (2) has polyethylene base.


In the same spirit, the invention proposes instrumentation for inserting or fitting the prosthesis according to one of claims 1 to 15 characterized in that it comprises an insertion guide (9,93) including an internal channel (90) presenting an end in which certain edges or support edges (910, 920, 931, 932), protrude from the others along the longitudinal axis (d9) of the channel so as to be able to take the place of distraction tools of a known type previously used to increase the opening of the disc space, this channel (90) presenting an internal section capable of surrounding these same distraction tools while they maintain this opening, then allowing their extraction through said channel while said support edges (910, 920, 931, 932), for their part, preserve the opening of the disc space by replacing the distraction tools, then receiving and guiding the prosthesis (P) for insertion in this disc space.


According to a particular aspect, the internal channel (90) presents an approximately rectangular section or with a shape approximately complementary to the exterior profile of the prosthesis, taken in a section along the plane perpendicular to the direction of insertion.


According to a particular aspect, the support edges (931, 932) of insertion guide (93) form an extension of the channel (90) walls located on a plane containing the axis of the spinal column.


According to a particular aspect, the insertion guide (9) is formed from at least two elements (91, 92) separated along one or more planes parallel to the longitudinal axis (d9) of the channel, these parts each including at least one portion of the transverse section of the channel and being able to be spread apart according to a determined angle (a9) and allowing the introduction and sliding of the prosthesis (P) in the channel.


According to a particular aspect, the internal surface of the channel (90) on its walls opposite external faces of the plates (1, 3) of the prosthesis (P), includes at least one groove (913, 914) allowing the passage of protruding parts (8, 81) for anchoring provided by these plates during displacement of the prosthesis in this channel (90).


According to a particular aspect, the instrumentation comprises approach means (95) of the prosthesis capable of receiving the prosthesis and of maintaining with it all the different components, these approach means (95) being able to be connected by interlocking means to the insertion guide (93) so as to present the prosthesis at the entrance of the channel (90) in a position appropriate for allowing its entrance into this channel (90).


According to a particular aspect, the instruments comprises insertion means, called impactor (96) of the prosthesis in the channel (90) of the insertion guide (93) then into the disc space, this impactor being guided by the support means (95) so as to be in contact with the prosthesis in its part opposite the entrance of the channel (90), this impactor (96) being able to apply or transmit a pressure or repeated shocks to the prosthesis to cause its sliding in the channel, then its insertion in the disc space.


According to a particular aspect, the support means include two shafts (951, 952) connected by an axis to a assembling end (955), these shafts being able to be closed up to pinch the prosthesis (P) between them and to maintain it so assembled, these two shafts each providing connection means to the guide for use (93), this connection then maintaining these two shafts closed up on the prosthesis.


It must be obvious for those skilled in the art that the present invention allows embodiments in numerous other specific forms without going far from the field of application of the invention as claimed. As a result, the present embodiments must be considered by way of illustration, but may be modified in the field defined by the scope of the attached claims, and the invention must not be limited to details given above.

Claims
  • 1. Instrumentation for surgically inserting an intervertebral prosthesis in a gap between a first vertebra and a second vertebra, the instrumentation comprising an insertion guide having a longitudinal axis and comprising: a first end having an opening through which the intervertebral prosthesis may pass and through which a distraction tool may be received;a second end having an opening through which the intervertebral prosthesis may pass and through which a distraction tool may be received;a channel extending from the first end to the second end arranged and configured with a passage permitting transit of the intervertebral prosthesis and the distraction tool along the longitudinal axis through the first end and through the second end, the channel comprising a first wall having an exterior surface orientable toward the first vertebra,a second wall disposed on an opposite side of the insertion guide from the first wall and having an exterior surface orientable toward the second vertebra,first and second opposing side walls each extending from the first wall to the second wall,a groove in the first wall or the second wall, the groove extending along the entire length of the passage and opening at the first and second ends, the groove being configured and arranged for passage of an anchor projecting from a surface of the intervertebral prosthesis completely through the guide, andedges protruding from at least one of the opposing side walls at the second end along the longitudinal axis, the edges configured and arranged to maintain separation of the first and second vertebrae during insertion of the intervertebral prosthesis.
  • 2. Instrumentation of claim 1 in which the channel has an approximately rectangular cross section that is approximately complementary to the exterior profile of the prosthesis.
  • 3. Instrumentation of claim 1 in which the edges are formed by extensions of walls of the channel.
  • 4. Instrumentation of claim 1 further comprising plural elements forming the channel, which elements are adjustable to form a determined angle.
  • 5. Instrumentation of claim 1 in which each of plural surfaces of the channel comprises a groove extending along a length of the channel through the openings of the first and second ends configured and arranged for passage of an anchor of the intervertebral prosthesis through the guide.
  • 6. Instrumentation of claim 1 further comprising a support configured to hold the intervertebral prosthesis stable during approach to the channel.
  • 7. Instrumentation of claim 6 further comprising an impactor cooperating with a guide of the support, the impactor having a striking end configured for application of a force and an impacting end configured to transmit the force to the intervertebral prosthesis.
  • 8. Instrumentation for surgically inserting an intervertebral prosthesis in a gap between the opposing endplates of two adjacent vertebrae comprising an insertion guide comprising: a longitudinal axis,a first end and a second end each having an opening through which the intervertebral prosthesis may pass and through which a distraction tool may extend,a channel extending from the first end to the second end and having a generally rectangular cross section with opposing generally planar walls configured for alignment with the opposing endplates, the channel arranged and configured for passage along the longitudinal axis of the intervertebral prosthesis and the distraction tool through the first end and the second end, with at least one of the opposing generally planar walls comprising a scallop extending along a length of the channel and configured and arranged for passage of an anchor projecting from a surface of the intervertebral prosthesis through the guide and into one of the vertebrae, andvertebral support walls of the channel configured to support the adjacent vertebrae during insertion of the intervertebral prosthesis; andan assembly tool having at least one interlock configured for engagement with a cooperating interlock of the insertion guide, with the interlock of the assembly tool comprising a hook and the interlock of the insertion guide comprising a tongue.
  • 9. Instrumentation for surgically inserting an intervertebral prosthesis in a gap between the opposing endplates of two adjacent vertebrae comprising an insertion guide comprising: a longitudinal axis,a first end and a second end each having an opening through which the intervertebral prosthesis may pass and through which a distraction tool may extend,a channel extending from the first end to the second end and having a generally rectangular cross section with opposing generally planar walls configured for alignment with the opposing endplates, the channel arranged and configured for passage along the longitudinal axis of the intervertebral prosthesis and the distraction tool through the first end and the second end, with at least one of the opposing generally planar walls comprising a scallop extending along a length of the channel and configured and arranged for passage of an anchor projecting from a surface of the intervertebral prosthesis through the guide and into one of the vertebrae, andvertebral support walls of the channel configured to support the adjacent vertebrae during insertion of the intervertebral prosthesis; anda support configured to position and support the intervertebral prosthesis during its approach to the gap comprising shafts connected by an articulation.
  • 10. Instrumentation for surgically inserting an intervertebral prosthesis in a gap between the opposing endplates of two adjacent vertebrae comprising an insertion guide comprising: a longitudinal axis,a first end and a second end each having an opening through which the intervertebral prosthesis may pass and through which a distraction tool may extend,a channel extending from the first end to the second end and having a generally rectangular cross section with opposing generally planar walls configured for alignment with the opposing endplates, the channel arranged and configured for passage along the longitudinal axis of the intervertebral prosthesis and the distraction tool through the first end and the second end, with at least one of the opposing generally planar walls comprising a scallop extending along a length of the channel and configured and arranged for passage of an anchor projecting from a surface of the intervertebral prosthesis through the guide and into one of the vertebrae, andvertebral support walls of the channel configured to support the adjacent vertebrae during insertion of the intervertebral prosthesis; anda support configured to position and support the intervertebral prosthesis during its approach to the gap comprising an interlock configured to engage a complementary interlock of the insertion guide.
  • 11. Instrumentation of claim 10 in which the interlock of the support comprises a scallop and the interlock of the insertion guide comprises a tongue.
Priority Claims (1)
Number Date Country Kind
01 05982 May 2001 FR national
RELATED APPLICATIONS

The present application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/476,565 filed Nov. 4, 2003, and issuing Feb. 5, 2008, as U.S. Pat. No. 7,326,250, which is a 35 U.S.C. §371 application of PCT/IB02/002998 filed May 3, 2002, which claims priority to FR 01/05982 filed May 4, 2001. All of the foregoing documents are hereby incorporated by reference.

US Referenced Citations (746)
Number Name Date Kind
566360 White Aug 1896 A
1436573 Choppinet et al. Nov 1922 A
2836442 Moskovitz May 1958 A
3325197 Wehner Jun 1967 A
3374786 Callender et al. Mar 1968 A
3486505 Morrison Dec 1969 A
3791380 Dawidowski Feb 1974 A
3857642 Miller Dec 1974 A
3892232 Neufeld Jul 1975 A
3958278 Lee et al. May 1976 A
4009712 Burstein et al. Mar 1977 A
4074542 Hankosky et al. Feb 1978 A
4085466 Goodfellow et al. Apr 1978 A
4135506 Ulrich Jan 1979 A
4175555 Herbert Nov 1979 A
4237875 Termanini Dec 1980 A
4309777 Patil Jan 1982 A
4349921 Kuntz Sep 1982 A
4379451 Getscher Apr 1983 A
4409974 Freedland Oct 1983 A
4432358 Fixel Feb 1984 A
4488543 Tornier Dec 1984 A
4494535 Haig Jan 1985 A
4519100 Wills et al. May 1985 A
4561432 Mazor Dec 1985 A
4612920 Lower Sep 1986 A
4621629 Koeneman Nov 1986 A
4632101 Freedland Dec 1986 A
4653489 Tronzo Mar 1987 A
4655778 Koeneman Apr 1987 A
4657001 Fixel Apr 1987 A
4714469 Kenna Dec 1987 A
4721103 Freedland Jan 1988 A
4756711 Mai et al. Jul 1988 A
4759352 Lozier Jul 1988 A
4759766 Buettner-Janz et al. Jul 1988 A
4759769 Hedman et al. Jul 1988 A
4787378 Sodhi Nov 1988 A
4787908 Wyss et al. Nov 1988 A
4791918 Von Hasselbach Dec 1988 A
4863476 Shepperd Sep 1989 A
4874389 Downey Oct 1989 A
4892545 Day et al. Jan 1990 A
4898156 Gatturna et al. Feb 1990 A
4911718 Lee et al. Mar 1990 A
4932975 Main et al. Jun 1990 A
4946378 Hirayama et al. Aug 1990 A
4946468 Li Aug 1990 A
4955908 Frey et al. Sep 1990 A
4955916 Carignan et al. Sep 1990 A
4964403 Karas et al. Oct 1990 A
4968315 Gatturna Nov 1990 A
4969887 Sodhi Nov 1990 A
4973332 Kummer Nov 1990 A
4973333 Treharne Nov 1990 A
4997432 Keller Mar 1991 A
5002550 Li Mar 1991 A
5002576 Fuhrmann et al. Mar 1991 A
5007910 Anapliotis et al. Apr 1991 A
5032125 Durham et al. Jul 1991 A
5041114 Chapman et al. Aug 1991 A
5041116 Wilson Aug 1991 A
5041139 Branemark Aug 1991 A
5046513 Gatturna et al. Sep 1991 A
5057103 Davis Oct 1991 A
5062851 Branemark Nov 1991 A
5071437 Steffee Dec 1991 A
5087266 Connell et al. Feb 1992 A
5098433 Freedland Mar 1992 A
5116336 Frigg May 1992 A
5122130 Keller Jun 1992 A
5123926 Pisharodi Jun 1992 A
5129901 Decoste Jul 1992 A
5171281 Parsons et al. Dec 1992 A
5176681 Lawes et al. Jan 1993 A
5192303 Gatturna et al. Mar 1993 A
5192327 Brantigan Mar 1993 A
5197986 Mikhail Mar 1993 A
5207679 Li May 1993 A
5217486 Rice et al. Jun 1993 A
5242448 Pettine et al. Sep 1993 A
5246458 Graham Sep 1993 A
5258031 Salib et al. Nov 1993 A
5290312 Kojimoto et al. Mar 1994 A
5300074 Frigg Apr 1994 A
5306309 Wagner et al. Apr 1994 A
5314477 Marnay May 1994 A
5324292 Meyers Jun 1994 A
5342394 Matsuno et al. Aug 1994 A
5356410 Pennig Oct 1994 A
5356413 Martins et al. Oct 1994 A
5358526 Tornier Oct 1994 A
5370697 Baumgartner Dec 1994 A
5372599 Martins Dec 1994 A
5397364 Kozak et al. Mar 1995 A
5401269 Buettner-Janz et al. Mar 1995 A
5417692 Goble et al. May 1995 A
5417712 Whittaker et al. May 1995 A
5425773 Boyd et al. Jun 1995 A
5429641 Gotfried Jul 1995 A
5437674 Worcel et al. Aug 1995 A
5456721 Legrand Oct 1995 A
5458601 Young, Jr. et al. Oct 1995 A
5472452 Trott Dec 1995 A
5478342 Kohrs Dec 1995 A
5489210 Hanosh Feb 1996 A
5507754 Green et al. Apr 1996 A
5507816 Bullivant Apr 1996 A
5522845 Wenstrom, Jr. Jun 1996 A
5531792 Huene Jul 1996 A
5534004 Santangelo Jul 1996 A
5534029 Shima Jul 1996 A
5534030 Navarro et al. Jul 1996 A
5545229 Parsons et al. Aug 1996 A
5549617 Green et al. Aug 1996 A
5554191 Lahille et al. Sep 1996 A
5556431 Buettner-Janz et al. Sep 1996 A
5562689 Green et al. Oct 1996 A
5562738 Boyd et al. Oct 1996 A
5571104 Li Nov 1996 A
5571109 Bertagnoli Nov 1996 A
5571189 Kuslich Nov 1996 A
5578035 Lin Nov 1996 A
5591168 Judet et al. Jan 1997 A
5593409 Michelson Jan 1997 A
5609636 Kohrs et al. Mar 1997 A
5613974 Andreas et al. Mar 1997 A
5620012 Benderev et al. Apr 1997 A
5643321 McDevitt Jul 1997 A
5645596 Kim Jul 1997 A
5674294 Bainville et al. Oct 1997 A
5676701 Yuan et al. Oct 1997 A
5676702 Ratron Oct 1997 A
5683465 Shinn et al. Nov 1997 A
5702449 McKay Dec 1997 A
5702450 Bisserie Dec 1997 A
5702472 Huebner Dec 1997 A
5722977 Wilhelmy Mar 1998 A
5741253 Michelson Apr 1998 A
5766252 Henry et al. Jun 1998 A
5766253 Brosnahan, III Jun 1998 A
5772661 Michelson Jun 1998 A
5776199 Michelson Jul 1998 A
5782832 Larsen et al. Jul 1998 A
5782919 Zdeblick et al. Jul 1998 A
5797909 Michelson Aug 1998 A
5800550 Sertich Sep 1998 A
5824094 Serhan et al. Oct 1998 A
5827328 Buttermann Oct 1998 A
5865848 Baker Feb 1999 A
5888224 Beckers et al. Mar 1999 A
5888226 Rogozinski Mar 1999 A
5893889 Harrington Apr 1999 A
5895427 Kuslich et al. Apr 1999 A
5895428 Berry Apr 1999 A
5899941 Nishijima et al. May 1999 A
5968098 Winslow Oct 1999 A
5980522 Koros et al. Nov 1999 A
5984967 Zdeblick et al. Nov 1999 A
6001130 Bryan et al. Dec 1999 A
6010502 Bagby Jan 2000 A
6033438 Bianchi et al. Mar 2000 A
6039763 Shelokov Mar 2000 A
6045552 Zucherman et al. Apr 2000 A
6063088 Winslow May 2000 A
6063121 Xavier et al. May 2000 A
6080158 Lin Jun 2000 A
6093205 McLeod et al. Jul 2000 A
6096038 Michelson Aug 2000 A
6096080 Nicholson et al. Aug 2000 A
6099531 Bonutti Aug 2000 A
6102950 Vaccaro Aug 2000 A
6113637 Gill et al. Sep 2000 A
6113638 Williams et al. Sep 2000 A
6129763 Chauvin et al. Oct 2000 A
6136031 Middleton Oct 2000 A
6146421 Gordon et al. Nov 2000 A
6146422 Lawson Nov 2000 A
6149650 Michelson Nov 2000 A
6156067 Bryan et al. Dec 2000 A
6179873 Zientek Jan 2001 B1
6179874 Cauthen Jan 2001 B1
6193757 Foley et al. Feb 2001 B1
6206922 Zdeblick et al. Mar 2001 B1
6210412 Michelson Apr 2001 B1
6214050 Huene Apr 2001 B1
6221077 Rinner et al. Apr 2001 B1
6224595 Michelson May 2001 B1
6224607 Michelson May 2001 B1
6228118 Gordon May 2001 B1
6231609 Mehdizadeh May 2001 B1
6241769 Nicholson et al. Jun 2001 B1
6245072 Zdeblick et al. Jun 2001 B1
6258094 Nicholson et al. Jul 2001 B1
6261293 Nicholson et al. Jul 2001 B1
6264656 Michelson Jul 2001 B1
6267763 Castro Jul 2001 B1
6270498 Michelson Aug 2001 B1
6277149 Boyle et al. Aug 2001 B1
6283998 Eaton Sep 2001 B1
6296664 Middleton Oct 2001 B1
6302914 Michelson Oct 2001 B1
6306170 Ray Oct 2001 B2
6315797 Middleton Nov 2001 B1
6319257 Carignan et al. Nov 2001 B1
6344057 Rabbe et al. Feb 2002 B1
6364880 Michelson Apr 2002 B1
6368350 Erickson et al. Apr 2002 B1
6371988 Pafford et al. Apr 2002 B1
6375655 Zdeblick et al. Apr 2002 B1
6387130 Stone et al. May 2002 B1
6395035 Bresina et al. May 2002 B2
6402750 Atkinson et al. Jun 2002 B1
6402785 Zdeblick et al. Jun 2002 B1
6409765 Bianchi et al. Jun 2002 B1
6413278 Marchosky Jul 2002 B1
6416551 Keller Jul 2002 B1
6419703 Fallin et al. Jul 2002 B1
6419704 Ferree Jul 2002 B1
6419706 Graf Jul 2002 B1
6423063 Bonutti Jul 2002 B1
6423095 Van Hoeck et al. Jul 2002 B1
6440168 Cauthen Aug 2002 B1
6447512 Landry et al. Sep 2002 B1
6447544 Michelson Sep 2002 B1
6447546 Bramlet et al. Sep 2002 B1
6447547 Michelson Sep 2002 B1
6468310 Ralph et al. Oct 2002 B1
6471724 Zdeblick et al. Oct 2002 B2
6478800 Fraser et al. Nov 2002 B1
6478823 Michelson Nov 2002 B1
6482234 Weber et al. Nov 2002 B1
6485517 Michelson Nov 2002 B1
6500205 Michelson Dec 2002 B1
6506216 McCue et al. Jan 2003 B1
6514260 Zdeblick et al. Feb 2003 B1
6517580 Ramadan et al. Feb 2003 B1
6520967 Cauthen Feb 2003 B1
6520996 Manasas et al. Feb 2003 B1
6524312 Landry et al. Feb 2003 B2
6527804 Gauchet et al. Mar 2003 B1
6527806 Ralph et al. Mar 2003 B2
6540785 Gill et al. Apr 2003 B1
6558423 Michelson May 2003 B1
6565605 Goble et al. May 2003 B2
6572653 Simonson Jun 2003 B1
6579291 Keith et al. Jun 2003 B1
6579320 Gauchet et al. Jun 2003 B1
6582468 Gauchet Jun 2003 B1
6592624 Fraser et al. Jul 2003 B1
6599294 Fuss et al. Jul 2003 B2
6599320 Kuslich et al. Jul 2003 B1
6607530 Carl et al. Aug 2003 B1
6607558 Kuras Aug 2003 B2
6610089 Liu et al. Aug 2003 B1
6610092 Ralph et al. Aug 2003 B2
6610093 Pisharodi Aug 2003 B1
6613091 Zdeblick et al. Sep 2003 B1
6616671 Landry et al. Sep 2003 B2
6641614 Wagner et al. Nov 2003 B1
6645206 Zdeblick et al. Nov 2003 B1
6645249 Ralph et al. Nov 2003 B2
6648893 Dudasik Nov 2003 B2
6652533 O'Neil Nov 2003 B2
6652586 Hunter et al. Nov 2003 B2
6656224 Middleton Dec 2003 B2
6669730 Ralph et al. Dec 2003 B2
6669731 Ralph et al. Dec 2003 B2
6669732 Serhan et al. Dec 2003 B2
6673113 Ralph et al. Jan 2004 B2
6679887 Nicholson et al. Jan 2004 B2
6679915 Cauthen Jan 2004 B1
6682562 Viart et al. Jan 2004 B2
6695851 Zdeblick et al. Feb 2004 B2
6695882 Bianchi et al. Feb 2004 B2
6706068 Ferree Mar 2004 B2
6709439 Rogers et al. Mar 2004 B2
6709458 Michelson Mar 2004 B2
6716247 Michelson Apr 2004 B2
6719794 Gerber et al. Apr 2004 B2
6723127 Ralph et al. Apr 2004 B2
6723128 Uk Apr 2004 B2
6726720 Ross et al. Apr 2004 B2
6730088 Yeh May 2004 B2
6733504 Lin et al. May 2004 B2
6733532 Gauchet et al. May 2004 B1
6733535 Michelson May 2004 B2
6736850 Davis May 2004 B2
6740117 Ralph et al. May 2004 B2
6740118 Eisermann et al. May 2004 B2
6749635 Bryan Jun 2004 B1
6749636 Michelson Jun 2004 B2
6752832 Neumann Jun 2004 B2
6755841 Fraser et al. Jun 2004 B2
6764512 Keller Jul 2004 B2
6764515 Ralph et al. Jul 2004 B2
6767367 Michelson Jul 2004 B1
6770074 Michelson Aug 2004 B2
6770095 Grinberg et al. Aug 2004 B2
6770096 Bolger et al. Aug 2004 B2
6793678 Hawkins Sep 2004 B2
6793679 Michelson Sep 2004 B2
6800093 Nicholson et al. Oct 2004 B2
6805714 Sutcliffe Oct 2004 B2
6808537 Michelson Oct 2004 B2
6814737 Cauthen Nov 2004 B2
6824565 Muhanna et al. Nov 2004 B2
6835206 Jackson Dec 2004 B2
6849093 Michelson Feb 2005 B2
6890355 Michelson May 2005 B2
6899735 Coates et al. May 2005 B2
6902580 Fallin et al. Jun 2005 B2
6916340 Metzger et al. Jul 2005 B2
6923811 Carl et al. Aug 2005 B1
6923830 Michelson Aug 2005 B2
6936071 Marnay et al. Aug 2005 B1
6955691 Chae et al. Oct 2005 B2
6962606 Michelson Nov 2005 B2
6964686 Gordon Nov 2005 B2
6966929 Mitchell Nov 2005 B2
6972019 Michelson Dec 2005 B2
6972035 Michelson Dec 2005 B2
6981975 Michelson Jan 2006 B2
6984245 McGahan et al. Jan 2006 B2
6986789 Schultz et al. Jan 2006 B2
6994727 Khandkar et al. Feb 2006 B2
7001385 Bonutti Feb 2006 B2
7001432 Keller et al. Feb 2006 B2
7008453 Michelson Mar 2006 B1
7011684 Eckman Mar 2006 B2
7025787 Bryan et al. Apr 2006 B2
7033394 Michelson Apr 2006 B2
7041135 Michelson May 2006 B2
7041136 Goble et al. May 2006 B2
7056344 Huppert et al. Jun 2006 B2
7060097 Fraser et al. Jun 2006 B2
7060099 Carli et al. Jun 2006 B2
7063701 Michelson Jun 2006 B2
7063702 Michelson Jun 2006 B2
7066961 Michelson Jun 2006 B2
7074237 Goble et al. Jul 2006 B2
7090698 Goble et al. Aug 2006 B2
7094239 Michelson Aug 2006 B1
7105023 Eckman Sep 2006 B2
7105024 Richelsoph Sep 2006 B2
7112206 Michelson Sep 2006 B2
7118579 Michelson Oct 2006 B2
7118580 Byersdorff et al. Oct 2006 B1
7118598 Michelson Oct 2006 B2
7128760 Michelson Oct 2006 B2
7128761 Kuras et al. Oct 2006 B2
7153325 Kim et al. Dec 2006 B2
7163561 Michelson Jan 2007 B2
7169153 Keller Jan 2007 B2
7175662 Link et al. Feb 2007 B2
7179294 Eisermann et al. Feb 2007 B2
7198644 Schultz et al. Apr 2007 B2
7204851 Trieu et al. Apr 2007 B2
7204852 Marnay et al. Apr 2007 B2
7211112 Baynham et al. May 2007 B2
7217291 Zucherman et al. May 2007 B2
7217292 Ralph et al. May 2007 B2
7217293 Branch, Jr. May 2007 B2
7223289 Trieu et al. May 2007 B2
7232463 Falahee Jun 2007 B2
7232464 Mathieu et al. Jun 2007 B2
7291170 Huppert Nov 2007 B2
7326248 Michelson Feb 2008 B2
7326250 Beaurain et al. Feb 2008 B2
7410501 Michelson Aug 2008 B2
7419505 Fleischmann et al. Sep 2008 B2
7431735 Liu et al. Oct 2008 B2
7435262 Michelson Oct 2008 B2
7442209 Michelson Oct 2008 B2
7445635 Fallin et al. Nov 2008 B2
7445636 Michelson Nov 2008 B2
7455692 Michelson Nov 2008 B2
7465317 Malberg et al. Dec 2008 B2
7494508 Zeegers Feb 2009 B2
7503933 Michelson Mar 2009 B2
7540882 Michelson Jun 2009 B2
7566345 Fallin et al. Jul 2009 B1
7588590 Chervitz et al. Sep 2009 B2
7591851 Winslow et al. Sep 2009 B2
7594932 Aferzon et al. Sep 2009 B2
7601170 Winslow et al. Oct 2009 B2
7608107 Michelson Oct 2009 B2
7618453 Goble et al. Nov 2009 B2
7618455 Goble et al. Nov 2009 B2
7618456 Mathieu et al. Nov 2009 B2
7621955 Goble et al. Nov 2009 B2
7621958 Zdeblick et al. Nov 2009 B2
7632282 Dinville Dec 2009 B2
7637951 Michelson Dec 2009 B2
7637954 Michelson Dec 2009 B2
7641690 Abdou Jan 2010 B2
7655027 Michelson Feb 2010 B2
7658766 Melkent et al. Feb 2010 B2
7682396 Beaurain et al. Mar 2010 B2
7695516 Zeegers Apr 2010 B2
7695517 Benzel et al. Apr 2010 B2
7727280 McLuen Jun 2010 B2
7749252 Zucherman et al. Jul 2010 B2
7749274 Razian Jul 2010 B2
7753937 Chervitz et al. Jul 2010 B2
7771473 Thramann Aug 2010 B2
7771475 Michelson Aug 2010 B2
7776090 Winslow et al. Aug 2010 B2
7780670 Bonutti Aug 2010 B2
7789914 Michelson Sep 2010 B2
7794502 Michelson Sep 2010 B2
7799053 Haid, Jr. et al. Sep 2010 B2
7799057 Hudgins et al. Sep 2010 B2
7799081 McKinley Sep 2010 B2
7811326 Braddock, Jr. et al. Oct 2010 B2
7819903 Fraser et al. Oct 2010 B2
7824445 Biro et al. Nov 2010 B2
7833255 Chow et al. Nov 2010 B2
7842088 Rashbaum et al. Nov 2010 B2
7846207 Lechmann et al. Dec 2010 B2
7850731 Brittan et al. Dec 2010 B2
7850732 Heinz Dec 2010 B2
7850733 Baynham et al. Dec 2010 B2
7862616 Lechmann et al. Jan 2011 B2
7871441 Eckman Jan 2011 B2
7875076 Mathieu et al. Jan 2011 B2
7887591 Aebi et al. Feb 2011 B2
7892261 Bonutti Feb 2011 B2
7892286 Michelson Feb 2011 B2
7909871 Abdou Mar 2011 B2
7914560 Hoy et al. Mar 2011 B2
7922729 Michelson Apr 2011 B2
7931674 Zucherman et al. Apr 2011 B2
7931840 Michelson Apr 2011 B2
7935149 Michelson May 2011 B2
7951198 Sucec et al. May 2011 B2
7955390 Fallin et al. Jun 2011 B2
7972337 Boyajian et al. Jul 2011 B2
7972363 Moskowitz et al. Jul 2011 B2
7972365 Michelson Jul 2011 B2
7976566 Michelson Jul 2011 B2
7985255 Bray et al. Jul 2011 B2
7985258 Zdeblick et al. Jul 2011 B2
7993373 Hoy et al. Aug 2011 B2
7998177 Hoy et al. Aug 2011 B2
7998178 Hoy et al. Aug 2011 B2
8002835 Zeegers Aug 2011 B2
8007534 Michelson Aug 2011 B2
8021401 Carl et al. Sep 2011 B2
8021430 Michelson Sep 2011 B2
8043334 Fisher et al. Oct 2011 B2
8062336 Triplett et al. Nov 2011 B2
8062375 Glerum et al. Nov 2011 B2
8066741 Fallin et al. Nov 2011 B2
8066749 Winslow et al. Nov 2011 B2
8070816 Taylor Dec 2011 B2
8070819 Aferzon et al. Dec 2011 B2
8075593 Hess Dec 2011 B2
8075618 Trieu et al. Dec 2011 B2
8075621 Michelson Dec 2011 B2
8114082 Boyajian et al. Feb 2012 B2
20010020185 Ray Sep 2001 A1
20020040243 Attali et al. Apr 2002 A1
20020087212 James et al. Jul 2002 A1
20020143343 Castro Oct 2002 A1
20020161444 Choi Oct 2002 A1
20020165613 Lin et al. Nov 2002 A1
20020193880 Fraser Dec 2002 A1
20030028249 Baccelli et al. Feb 2003 A1
20030055503 O'Neil Mar 2003 A1
20030069586 Errico et al. Apr 2003 A1
20030074075 Thomas, Jr. et al. Apr 2003 A1
20030093153 Banick et al. May 2003 A1
20030093156 Metzger et al. May 2003 A1
20030109928 Pasquet et al. Jun 2003 A1
20030135279 Michelson Jul 2003 A1
20030149438 Nichols et al. Aug 2003 A1
20030171814 Muhanna et al. Sep 2003 A1
20030187436 Bolger et al. Oct 2003 A1
20030187506 Ross et al. Oct 2003 A1
20030220691 Songer et al. Nov 2003 A1
20030233145 Landry et al. Dec 2003 A1
20040002758 Landry et al. Jan 2004 A1
20040002761 Rogers et al. Jan 2004 A1
20040010312 Enayati Jan 2004 A1
20040010316 William et al. Jan 2004 A1
20040024406 Ralph et al. Feb 2004 A1
20040030387 Landry et al. Feb 2004 A1
20040034423 Lyons et al. Feb 2004 A1
20040073309 Bianchi et al. Apr 2004 A1
20040073311 Ferree Apr 2004 A1
20040083000 Keller et al. Apr 2004 A1
20040093082 Ferree May 2004 A1
20040093083 Branch et al. May 2004 A1
20040102846 Keller et al. May 2004 A1
20040111160 Evans et al. Jun 2004 A1
20040117022 Marnay et al. Jun 2004 A1
20040133278 Marino et al. Jul 2004 A1
20040133281 Khandkar et al. Jul 2004 A1
20040143332 Krueger et al. Jul 2004 A1
20040148029 Bianchi et al. Jul 2004 A1
20040153157 Keller Aug 2004 A1
20040158254 Eisermann Aug 2004 A1
20040158328 Eisermann Aug 2004 A1
20040162617 Zucherman et al. Aug 2004 A1
20040172020 Beaurain et al. Sep 2004 A1
20040193273 Huang Sep 2004 A1
20040199254 Louis et al. Oct 2004 A1
20040210313 Michelson Oct 2004 A1
20040220582 Keller Nov 2004 A1
20040225295 Zubok et al. Nov 2004 A1
20040225363 Richelsoph Nov 2004 A1
20040225364 Richelsoph Nov 2004 A1
20040243238 Arnin et al. Dec 2004 A1
20040243240 Beaurain et al. Dec 2004 A1
20040254577 Delecrin et al. Dec 2004 A1
20040254643 Jackson Dec 2004 A1
20050010215 Delecrin et al. Jan 2005 A1
20050015094 Keller Jan 2005 A1
20050015095 Keller Jan 2005 A1
20050015149 Michelson Jan 2005 A1
20050021042 Marnay et al. Jan 2005 A1
20050027359 Mashburn Feb 2005 A1
20050027363 Gordon Feb 2005 A1
20050033305 Schultz Feb 2005 A1
20050033428 Keller Feb 2005 A1
20050033435 Belliard et al. Feb 2005 A1
20050033437 Bao et al. Feb 2005 A1
20050033438 Schultz Feb 2005 A1
20050038512 Michelson Feb 2005 A1
20050043798 Eckman Feb 2005 A1
20050043800 Paul et al. Feb 2005 A1
20050043804 Gordon et al. Feb 2005 A1
20050049590 Alleyne et al. Mar 2005 A1
20050060034 Berry et al. Mar 2005 A1
20050060037 Michelson Mar 2005 A1
20050065608 Michelson Mar 2005 A1
20050065611 Huppert et al. Mar 2005 A1
20050071009 Muhanna et al. Mar 2005 A1
20050085911 Link Apr 2005 A1
20050085917 Marnay et al. Apr 2005 A1
20050107788 Beaurain et al. May 2005 A1
20050113926 Zucherman et al. May 2005 A1
20050119665 Keller Jun 2005 A1
20050131542 Benzel et al. Jun 2005 A1
20050131544 Kuras et al. Jun 2005 A1
20050143733 Petit Jun 2005 A1
20050143824 Richelsoph et al. Jun 2005 A1
20050149189 Mokhtar et al. Jul 2005 A1
20050154462 Zucherman et al. Jul 2005 A1
20050159818 Blain Jul 2005 A1
20050165408 Puno et al. Jul 2005 A1
20050165485 Trieu Jul 2005 A1
20050171610 Humphreys et al. Aug 2005 A1
20050192671 Bao et al. Sep 2005 A1
20050197705 Arnin et al. Sep 2005 A1
20050197706 Hovorka et al. Sep 2005 A1
20050216086 Marik et al. Sep 2005 A1
20050216092 Marik et al. Sep 2005 A1
20050228500 Kim et al. Oct 2005 A1
20050234553 Gordon Oct 2005 A1
20050240273 Khandkar et al. Oct 2005 A1
20050246024 Zeegers Nov 2005 A1
20050251260 Gerber et al. Nov 2005 A1
20050256579 Keller et al. Nov 2005 A1
20050267581 Marnay et al. Dec 2005 A1
20050273171 Gordon et al. Dec 2005 A1
20050273173 Gordon et al. Dec 2005 A1
20050273174 Gordon et al. Dec 2005 A1
20050273175 Gordon et al. Dec 2005 A1
20050278026 Gordon et al. Dec 2005 A1
20050283242 Zucherman et al. Dec 2005 A1
20050283244 Gordon et al. Dec 2005 A1
20050283245 Gordon et al. Dec 2005 A1
20050283247 Gordon et al. Dec 2005 A1
20050283248 Gordon et al. Dec 2005 A1
20060015183 Gilbert et al. Jan 2006 A1
20060016768 Grichar et al. Jan 2006 A1
20060020341 Schneid et al. Jan 2006 A1
20060030860 Peterman Feb 2006 A1
20060036261 McDonnell Feb 2006 A1
20060036325 Paul et al. Feb 2006 A1
20060036326 Baumgartner et al. Feb 2006 A1
20060041313 Allard et al. Feb 2006 A1
20060041314 Millard Feb 2006 A1
20060058878 Michelson Mar 2006 A1
20060069437 Weber Mar 2006 A1
20060069441 Zucherman et al. Mar 2006 A1
20060085076 Krishna et al. Apr 2006 A1
20060085077 Cook et al. Apr 2006 A1
20060095136 McLuen May 2006 A1
20060111783 Aflatoon et al. May 2006 A1
20060116768 Krueger et al. Jun 2006 A1
20060116769 Marnay et al. Jun 2006 A1
20060122703 Aebi et al. Jun 2006 A1
20060129244 Ensign Jun 2006 A1
20060136063 Zeegers Jun 2006 A1
20060142863 Fraser et al. Jun 2006 A1
20060149273 Ross et al. Jul 2006 A1
20060149371 Marik et al. Jul 2006 A1
20060149378 Chase et al. Jul 2006 A1
20060155377 Beaurain et al. Jul 2006 A1
20060155378 Eckman Jul 2006 A1
20060173544 Gau Aug 2006 A1
20060178745 Bartish et al. Aug 2006 A1
20060178746 Bartish, Jr. et al. Aug 2006 A1
20060190082 Keller et al. Aug 2006 A1
20060200241 Rothman et al. Sep 2006 A1
20060200242 Rothman et al. Sep 2006 A1
20060200243 Rothman et al. Sep 2006 A1
20060206208 Michelson Sep 2006 A1
20060212123 Lechmann et al. Sep 2006 A1
20060235520 Pannu Oct 2006 A1
20060235526 Lemaire Oct 2006 A1
20060241764 Michelson Oct 2006 A1
20060253201 McLuen Nov 2006 A1
20060259143 Navarro et al. Nov 2006 A1
20060265072 Richelsoph Nov 2006 A1
20060282074 Renaud et al. Dec 2006 A1
20060287728 Mokhtar et al. Dec 2006 A1
20070010886 Banick et al. Jan 2007 A1
20070010887 Williams et al. Jan 2007 A1
20070016217 Dinville Jan 2007 A1
20070016297 Johnson Jan 2007 A1
20070016299 Eckman Jan 2007 A1
20070032871 Michelson Feb 2007 A1
20070055378 Ankney et al. Mar 2007 A1
20070073403 Lombardo et al. Mar 2007 A1
20070073404 Rashbaum et al. Mar 2007 A1
20070088362 Bonutti et al. Apr 2007 A1
20070100454 Burgess et al. May 2007 A1
20070100455 Parsons May 2007 A1
20070100456 Dooris et al. May 2007 A1
20070118223 Allard et al. May 2007 A1
20070123985 Errico et al. May 2007 A1
20070149974 Mangione Jun 2007 A1
20070162130 Rashbaum et al. Jul 2007 A1
20070250167 Bray et al. Oct 2007 A1
20070250168 Lechmann et al. Oct 2007 A1
20070270951 Davis et al. Nov 2007 A1
20070270954 Wu Nov 2007 A1
20070270961 Ferguson Nov 2007 A1
20070270967 Fallin et al. Nov 2007 A1
20070276498 Aebi et al. Nov 2007 A1
20070288094 Krishna et al. Dec 2007 A1
20070299524 Rivin Dec 2007 A1
20080027547 Yu et al. Jan 2008 A1
20080027550 Link et al. Jan 2008 A1
20080033555 Link et al. Feb 2008 A1
20080033562 Krishna et al. Feb 2008 A1
20080161930 Carls et al. Jul 2008 A1
20080195211 Lin et al. Aug 2008 A1
20080200984 Jodaitis et al. Aug 2008 A1
20080234686 Beaurain et al. Sep 2008 A1
20080249569 Waugh et al. Oct 2008 A1
20080249575 Waugh et al. Oct 2008 A1
20080249625 Waugh et al. Oct 2008 A1
20080262504 Ralph et al. Oct 2008 A1
20080294260 Gray Nov 2008 A1
20080300634 Gray Dec 2008 A1
20080300685 Carls et al. Dec 2008 A1
20080306596 Jones et al. Dec 2008 A1
20090030461 Hoy et al. Jan 2009 A1
20090030519 Falahee Jan 2009 A1
20090030520 Biedermann et al. Jan 2009 A1
20090076615 Duggal et al. Mar 2009 A1
20090099601 Aferzon et al. Apr 2009 A1
20090105830 Jones et al. Apr 2009 A1
20090105831 Jones et al. Apr 2009 A1
20090105832 Allain et al. Apr 2009 A1
20090118771 Gonzalez-Hernandez May 2009 A1
20090125071 Skinlo et al. May 2009 A1
20090132054 Zeegers May 2009 A1
20090157188 Zeegers Jun 2009 A1
20090164020 Janowski et al. Jun 2009 A1
20090182429 Humphreys et al. Jul 2009 A1
20090182430 Tyber et al. Jul 2009 A1
20090192613 Wing et al. Jul 2009 A1
20090192615 Tyber et al. Jul 2009 A1
20090204219 Beaurain et al. Aug 2009 A1
20090210062 Thalgott et al. Aug 2009 A1
20090216241 Dinville Aug 2009 A1
20090222100 Cipoletti et al. Sep 2009 A1
20090228108 Keller Sep 2009 A1
20090234455 Moskowitz et al. Sep 2009 A1
20090265007 Colleran Oct 2009 A1
20100057206 Duffield et al. Mar 2010 A1
20100070037 Parry et al. Mar 2010 A1
20100082109 Greenhalgh et al. Apr 2010 A1
20100087925 Kostuik et al. Apr 2010 A1
20100106249 Tyber et al. Apr 2010 A1
20100145459 McDonough et al. Jun 2010 A1
20100145460 McDonough et al. Jun 2010 A1
20100145463 Michelson Jun 2010 A1
20100152856 Overes et al. Jun 2010 A1
20100160984 Berry et al. Jun 2010 A1
20100161057 Berry et al. Jun 2010 A1
20100179655 Hansell et al. Jul 2010 A1
20100185289 Kirwan et al. Jul 2010 A1
20100204796 Bae et al. Aug 2010 A1
20100211108 Lemole, Jr. Aug 2010 A1
20100211176 Greenhalgh Aug 2010 A1
20100217393 Theofilos Aug 2010 A1
20100234958 Linares Sep 2010 A1
20100249935 Slivka et al. Sep 2010 A1
20100249937 Blain et al. Sep 2010 A1
20100280618 Jodaitis et al. Nov 2010 A1
20100286777 Errico et al. Nov 2010 A1
20100286787 Villiers et al. Nov 2010 A1
20100305700 Ben-Arye et al. Dec 2010 A1
20100305704 Messerli et al. Dec 2010 A1
20100312344 Reiley Dec 2010 A1
20100312345 Duffield et al. Dec 2010 A1
20100312346 Kueenzi et al. Dec 2010 A1
20110004310 Michelson Jan 2011 A1
20110009966 Michelson Jan 2011 A1
20110015745 Bucci Jan 2011 A1
20110035007 Patel et al. Feb 2011 A1
20110040382 Muhanna Feb 2011 A1
20110054616 Kamran et al. Mar 2011 A1
20110077738 Ciupik et al. Mar 2011 A1
20110077739 Rashbaum et al. Mar 2011 A1
20110082553 Abdou Apr 2011 A1
20110087327 Lechmann et al. Apr 2011 A1
20110093077 Aebi et al. Apr 2011 A1
20110118843 Mathieu et al. May 2011 A1
20110125267 Michelson May 2011 A1
20110137420 Michelson Jun 2011 A1
20110144703 Krause et al. Jun 2011 A1
20110160860 Johnston et al. Jun 2011 A1
20110166655 Michelson Jul 2011 A1
20110166656 Thalgott et al. Jul 2011 A1
20110166657 Thalgott et al. Jul 2011 A1
20110166658 Garber et al. Jul 2011 A1
20110172774 Varela Jul 2011 A1
20110196493 Pimenta Aug 2011 A1
20110196494 Yedlicka et al. Aug 2011 A1
20110202136 Brittan et al. Aug 2011 A1
20110208311 Janowski Aug 2011 A1
20110208313 Michelson Aug 2011 A1
20110230969 Biedermann et al. Sep 2011 A1
20110295371 Moskowitz et al. Dec 2011 A1
20110301713 Theofilos Dec 2011 A1
20110301714 Theofilos Dec 2011 A1
20110313528 Laubert et al. Dec 2011 A1
20120053693 Zeegers Mar 2012 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (124)
Number Date Country
2472708 Feb 2005 CA
2533473 Mar 2011 CA
2263842 Jul 1974 DE
2804936 Aug 1979 DE
3023353 Apr 1981 DE
8912648 Nov 1990 DE
4328690 Mar 1995 DE
29911422 Aug 1999 DE
20310432 Sep 2003 DE
20310433 Sep 2003 DE
20320454 Oct 2004 DE
10323363 Dec 2004 DE
102004027986 Jul 2005 DE
42271 Dec 1981 EP
176728 Apr 1986 EP
0298235 Jan 1989 EP
0317972 May 1989 EP
0333990 Sep 1989 EP
0356112 Feb 1990 EP
0512529 Nov 1992 EP
0560141 Sep 1993 EP
0566810 Oct 1993 EP
0637439 Feb 1995 EP
0697200 Feb 1996 EP
0566810 May 1996 EP
0738504 Oct 1996 EP
0747025 Dec 1996 EP
0852934 Jul 1998 EP
0903126 Mar 1999 EP
0951879 Oct 1999 EP
0955021 Nov 1999 EP
0978258 Feb 2000 EP
1222903 Jul 2002 EP
1250898 Oct 2002 EP
1287795 Mar 2003 EP
1344506 Sep 2003 EP
1344508 Sep 2003 EP
1504733 Feb 2005 EP
1374808 Dec 2005 EP
212815 Sep 1972 FR
2372622 Jun 1978 FR
2632516 Dec 1989 FR
2659226 Sep 1991 FR
2716619 Sep 1995 FR
2718635 Mar 1996 FR
2723841 Mar 1996 FR
2724108 Mar 1996 FR
2730159 Aug 1996 FR
2737656 Feb 1997 FR
2787019 Dec 1998 FR
2787021 Jun 2000 FR
2824261 Nov 2002 FR
2831796 May 2003 FR
2843293 Feb 2004 FR
2846550 May 2004 FR
2865629 Aug 2005 FR
2865630 Aug 2005 FR
2869528 Nov 2005 FR
2879436 Jun 2006 FR
2880795 Jul 2006 FR
2887762 Jan 2007 FR
2891135 Mar 2007 FR
2893838 Jun 2007 FR
2916956 Dec 2008 FR
2261446 Oct 1990 JP
WO9011740 Oct 1990 WO
WO9011740 Oct 1990 WO
WO9107931 Jun 1991 WO
WO9113598 Sep 1991 WO
WO9301771 Feb 1993 WO
WO9404100 Mar 1994 WO
WO9515133 Jun 1995 WO
WO9817209 Apr 1998 WO
WO9909914 Mar 1999 WO
WO9953871 Oct 1999 WO
WO9956675 Nov 1999 WO
WO9956676 Nov 1999 WO
WO9965412 Dec 1999 WO
WO9966864 Dec 1999 WO
WO0053127 Sep 2000 WO
WO0074606 Dec 2000 WO
WO0101893 Jan 2001 WO
WO0119295 Mar 2001 WO
WO0141680 Jun 2001 WO
WO0143620 Jun 2001 WO
WO0162191 Aug 2001 WO
WO0213732 Feb 2002 WO
WO02058599 Aug 2002 WO
WO02071960 Sep 2002 WO
WO02089701 Nov 2002 WO
WO03005939 Jan 2003 WO
WO03015646 Feb 2003 WO
WO03026522 Apr 2003 WO
WO03039400 May 2003 WO
WO03045262 Jun 2003 WO
WO03059212 Jul 2003 WO
WO03075803 Sep 2003 WO
WO03075804 Sep 2003 WO
WO2004034935 Apr 2004 WO
WO2004039291 May 2004 WO
WO2004041129 May 2004 WO
WO2004041131 May 2004 WO
WO2004071360 Aug 2004 WO
WO2004089256 Oct 2004 WO
WO2005007040 Jan 2005 WO
WO2005046534 May 2005 WO
WO2005051243 Jun 2005 WO
WO2005074839 Aug 2005 WO
WO2005104996 Nov 2005 WO
WO2005117728 Dec 2005 WO
WO2006016384 Feb 2006 WO
WO2006047587 May 2006 WO
WO2006062960 Jun 2006 WO
WO2006120505 Nov 2006 WO
WO2006130460 Dec 2006 WO
WO2006136760 Dec 2006 WO
WO2007000654 Jan 2007 WO
WO2007034310 Mar 2007 WO
WO2007063398 Jun 2007 WO
WO2007078978 Jul 2007 WO
WO2008099277 Aug 2008 WO
WO2008149223 Dec 2008 WO
WO2009033100 Mar 2009 WO
WO2011080535 Jul 2011 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (131)
Entry
USPTO OA of Feb. 6, 2007 in U.S. Appl. No. 11/109,276.
USPTO OA of Oct. 16, 2007 in U.S. Appl. No. 11/109,276.
USPTO OA of Jul. 24, 2008 in U.S. Appl. No. 11/109,276.
USPTO OA of Feb. 13, 2009 in U.S. Appl. No. 11/109,276.
Applicant's Reply to USPTO OA of Feb. 6, 2007 in U.S. Appl. No. 11/109,276.
Applicant's Reply to USPTO OA of Oct. 16, 2007 in U.S. Appl. No. 11/109,276.
Applicant's Reply to USPTO OA of Jul. 24, 2008 in U.S. Appl. No. 11/109,276.
Applicant's Response to USPTO OA of Feb. 13, 2009 in U.S. Appl. No. 11/109,276.
USPTO OA of Apr. 18, 2007 in U.S. Appl. No. 10/533,846.
Applicants' Response to USPTO OA of Apr. 18, 2007 in U.S. Appl. No. 10/533,846.
USPTO OA of Dec. 26, 2007 in U.S. Appl. No. 10/533,846.
Applicants' Response to USPTO OA of Dec. 26, 2007 in U.S. Appl. No. 10/533,846.
USPTO OA of Oct. 15, 2008 in U.S. Appl. No. 10/533,846.
Applicants' Response to USPTO OA of Oct. 15, 2008 in U.S. Appl. No. 10/533,846.
USPTO OA of Jan. 22, 2008 in U.S. Appl. No. 11/180,868.
Applicant's Response to USPTO OA of Jan. 22, 2008 in U.S. Appl. No. 11/180,868.
USPTO OA of Nov. 5, 2008 in U.S. Appl. No. 11/180,868.
Response to USPTO OA of Nov. 5, 2008 in U.S. Appl. No. 11/180,868.
USPTO OA of Apr. 13, 2009 in U.S. Appl. No. 11/341,007.
USPTO OA of Mar. 20, 2009 in U.S. Appl. No. 11/676,237.
USPTO OA of Feb. 18, 2009 in U.S. Appl. No. 11/632,253.
Applicants' Response to USPTO OA of Feb. 18, 2009 in U.S. Appl. No. 11/632,253.
A biolological basis for instantaneous centres of rotation of the vertebral column. N. Bouduk, B. Amevo, M. Pearcy, Proc Insititution Mechanical Engineers, Jun. 16, 1995, pp. 177-183.
A Multicenter Retrospective Study of the Clinical Results of the LINK SB Charite Intervertebral Prosthesis, S. L. Griffith, PhD, A. P. Shelokov, MD, K. Buttner-Janz, MD, Jean-Phillipe LeMaire, MD and W. S. Zeegers, MD, Spine, vol. 19, No. 16, pp. 1842-1849, Mar. 21, 1994.
A New Technique for the Three-Dimensional Study of the Spine in Vitro and In Vivo by Using a Motion-Analysis System, X. Liu, G. Fabry, K. Labey, L. Van Den Berghe, R. Van Audekercke, G. Molenaers, P. Moens. Journal of Spinal Disorders, vol. 10, No. 4, pp. 329-338, Jan. 30, 1997.
Alternatives to Spinal Fusion, J. P. Kostuik, Spinal Fusion, vol. 29, No. 4, Oct. 1998, pp. 701-415.
Centrode Patterns and Segmental Instability in Degenerative Disc Disease, S.D. Gertzban, MD, FRCSC, J. Seligman, MD, R. Holtby, MD, K.H. Chan, MD, A. Kapasouri, BSc, M. Tile, MD, BSc, (MED), FRCS ©, and B. Cruickshank, MD, FRCPath, Spine, vol. 10., No. 3, pp. 257-261, Jan. 21, 1984.
Clinical Biomechanics of the Spine, A. A. White III, M. M. Panjabi, pp. 128-130, 2nd Edition, J.B. Lippincott Co., 1990.
Computer Analysis of Spinal Segment Motion in Degenerative Disc Disease With and Without Axial Loading, J.V. Seligman, S.D. Gertzbein, M. Tile, A., Kapasouri, Spine, vol. 9., No. 6, pp. 566-573, Dec. 31, 1983.
FR 2 718 635 Preliminary Search Report, National Institute of Industrial Property (France), Jan. 16, 1995.
FR 2 730 159 Preliminary Search Report, National Institute of Industrial Property (France), Sep. 29, 1995.
FR 2 824 261 Preliminary Search Report, National Institute of Industrial Property (France), Feb. 25, 2002.
FR 2 831 796 Prelininary Search Report, National Institute of Industrial Property (France), Aug. 2, 2002.
FR 2 846 550 Prelininary Search Report, National Institute of Industrial Property (France), Jul. 10, 2003.
FR 2 865 629 Prelininary Search Report, National Institute of Industrial Property (France), Sep. 14, 2004.
FR 2 865 630 Prelininary Search Report, National Institute of Industrial Property (France), Jan. 12, 2005.
FR 2 869 528 Prelininary Search Report, National Institute of Industrial Property (France), Dec. 13, 2004.
Instantantaneous Axis of Rotation as a Function of the Three Columns of the Spine, T. R. Haher, MD, M. O'Brien, MD, W. T. Felmly, MD, D. Welin, MD, G. Perrier, MD., J. Choueka, MD, V. Devlin, MD, A. Vassiliou, ME, and G. Chow, MS, Spine, vol. 17, No. 6, pp. S149-S154, Jan. 9, 1992.
Instantantaneous Axis of Rotation of the Lumbar Intervertebral Joints, M. J. Pearcy, H. Bogduk, Spine, vol. 13, No. 9, pp. 1033-1041, Nov. 15, 1987.
Mobidisc (website) 1 page, www.ldrmedical.fr/mobidisc.htm, Sep. 19, 2004.
Motion Characteristics of the Normal Lumbar Spine in Young Adults: Instantaneous of Axis of Rotation and Vertebral Center Motion Analysis, T. Yoshioka, H. Tsuji, N. Hirano and S. Sainoh, Journal of Spinal Disorders, vol. 3, No. 2, pp. 103-113, 1990.
PCT/IB02/02998 International Search Report, EPO, Sep. 16, 2003.
PCT/IB02/04642 International Search Report, EPO, Jul. 2, 2003.
PCT/IB05/00280 International Search Report, EPO, Jun. 24, 2005.
PCT/IB05/01151 International Search Report, EPO, Sep. 12, 2005.
PCT/IB03/04872 International Search Report, EPO, Mar. 3, 2004.
PCT/IB02/02998 International Preliminary Examination Report, EPO, Dec. 22, 2003.
PCT/IB02/04642 International Preliminary Examination Report, EPO, Apr. 1, 2004.
PCT/IB03/04872 International Preliminary Examination Report, EPO, Mar. 1, 2005.
Relocation of the Bending Axis During Flexion-Extension of Lumbar Intervertebral Discs and its Implications for Prolapse, J.A. Klein and D.W.L. Hukins,Spine, vol. 8, No. 6, pp. 659-664, Nov. 18, 1982.
The Effect of the Three Columns of the Spine on the Instantaneous Axis of Rotation in Flexion and Extension, T. R. Haher, M. Bergman, M. O'Brien, W. T. Felmly, J. Choueka, D. Welin, G. Chow, A. Vassiliou, Spine, vol. 16, No. 8, pp. S312-S318, Apr. 16, 1991.
U.S. Patent & Trademark Office; Notice of Allowance in U.S. Appl. No. 10/494,418; Sep. 20, 2005; USPTO; Alexandria, Virgina; All Pages.
U.S. Patent & Trademark Office; Notice of Allowance in U.S. Appl. No. 10/533,846; Nov. 4, 2009; USPTO; Alexandria, Virgina; All Pages.
LDR Medical, by its attorneys; Reply to Office Action in U.S. Appl. No. 12/424,364; Feb. 27, 2012; USPTO; Alexandria, Virgina; All Pages.
U.S. Patent & Trademark Office; Office Action in U.S. Appl. No. 12/424,364; Jan. 26, 2012; USPTO; Alexandria, Virgina; All Pages.
LDR Medical, by its attorneys; Reply to Office Action in U.S. Appl. No. 12/424,364; Nov. 18, 2011; USPTO; Alexandria, Virgina; All Pages.
U.S. Patent & Trademark Office; Office Action in U.S. Appl. No. 12/424,364; May 18, 2011; USPTO; Alexandria, Virgina; All Pages.
U.S. Patent & Trademark Office; Office Action in U.S. Appl. No. 11/051,710; Dec. 15, 2011; USPTO; Alexandria, Virgina; All Pages.
LDR Medical, by its attorneys; Reply to Office Action in U.S. Appl. No. 11/051,710; Oct. 11, 2011; USPTO; Alexandria, Virgina; All Pages.
U.S. Patent & Trademark Office; Office Action in U.S. Appl. No. 11/051,710; Apr. 11, 2011; USPTO; Alexandria, Virgina; All Pages.
LDR Medical, by its attorneys; Reply to Office Action in U.S. Appl. No. 11/051,710; Jan. 20, 2011; USPTO; Alexandria, Virgina; All Pages.
U.S. Patent & Trademark Office; Office Action in U.S. Appl. No. 11/051,710; Jul. 20, 2010; USPTO; Alexandria, Virgina; All Pages.
LDR Medical, by its attorneys; Reply to Office Action in U.S. Appl. No. 11/051,710; Apr. 26, 2010; USPTO; Alexandria, Virgina; All Pages.
U.S. Patent & Trademark Office; Office Action in U.S. Appl. No. 11/051,710; Oct. 26, 2009; USPTO; Alexandria, Virgina; All Pages.
U.S. Patent & Trademark Office; Notice of Allowance in U.S. Appl. No. 11/098,266; Apr. 21, 2008; USPTO; Alexandria, Virgina; All Pages.
LDR Medical, by its attorneys; Reply to Office Action in U.S. Appl. No. 11/098,266; Feb. 6, 2008; USPTO; Alexandria, Virgina; All Pages.
U.S. Patent & Trademark Office; Office Action in U.S. Appl. No. 11/098,266; Aug. 6, 2007; USPTO; Alexandria, Virgina; All Pages.
LDR Medical, by its attorneys; Reply to Office Action in U.S. Appl. No. 11/098,266; May 23, 2007; USPTO; Alexandria, Virgina; All Pages.
U.S. Patent & Trademark Office; Office Action in U.S. Appl. No. 11/098,266; Nov. 29, 2006; USPTO; Alexandria, Virgina; All Pages.
LDR Medical, by its attorneys; Reply to Office Action in U.S. Appl. No. 11/098,266; Aug. 22, 2006; USPTO; Alexandria, Virgina; All Pages.
U.S. Patent & Trademark Office; Office Action in U.S. Appl. No. 11/098,266; Mar. 22, 2006; USPTO; Alexandria, Virgina; All Pages.
U.S. Patent & Trademark Office; Notice of Allowance in U.S. Appl. No. 12/391,086; Apr. 15, 2011; USPTO; Alexandria, Virgina; All Pages.
LDR Medical, by its attorneys; Reply to Office Action in U.S. Appl. No. 12/391,086; Jan. 31, 2011; USPTO; Alexandria, Virgina; All Pages.
U.S. Patent & Trademark Office; Office Action in U.S. Appl. No. 12/391,086; Jul. 29, 2010; USPTO; Alexandria, Virgina; All Pages.
U.S. Patent & Trademark Office; Notice of Allowance in U.S. Appl. No. 11/109,276; Dec. 8, 2009; USPTO; Alexandria, Virgina; All Pages.
U.S. Patent & Trademark Office; Notice of Allowance in U.S. Appl. No. 12/360,050; Mar. 26, 2012; USPTO; Alexandria, Virgina; All Pages.
LDR Medical, by its attorneys; Reply to Office Action in U.S. Appl. No. 12/360,050; Mar. 6, 2012; USPTO; Alexandria, Virgina; All Pages.
U.S. Patent & Trademark Office; Office Action in U.S. Appl. No. 12/360,050; Sep. 6, 2011; USPTO; Alexandria, Virgina; All Pages.
LDR Medical, by its attorneys; Reply to Office Action in U.S. Appl. No. 12/360,050; Jun. 16, 2011; USPTO; Alexandria, Virgina; All Pages.
U.S. Patent & Trademark Office; Office Action in U.S. Appl. No. 12/360,050; Dec. 17, 2010; USPTO; Alexandria, Virgina; All Pages.
U.S. Patent & Trademark Office; Notice of Allowance in U.S. Appl. No. 11/180,868; Jul. 31, 2009; USPTO; Alexandria, Virgina; All Pages.
U.S. Patent & Trademark Office; Notice of Allowance in U.S. Appl. No. 11/180,868; Jul. 17, 2009; USPTO; Alexandria, Virgina; All Pages.
LDR Medical, by its attorneys; Reply to Office Action in U.S. Appl. No. 12/435,955; Apr. 11, 2012; USPTO; Alexandria, Virgina; All Pages.
U.S. Patent & Trademark Office; Office Action in U.S. Appl. No. 12/435,955; Oct. 11, 2011; USPTO; Alexandria, Virgina; All Pages.
U.S. Patent & Trademark Office; Notice of Allowance in U.S. Appl. No. 11/341,007; Jul. 26, 2010; USPTO; Alexandria, Virgina; All Pages.
LDR Medical, by its attorneys; Reply to Office Action in U.S. Appl. No. 11/341,007; Jun. 17, 2010; USPTO; Alexandria, Virgina; All Pages.
U.S. Patent & Trademark Office; Office Action in U.S. Appl. No. 11/341,007; Dec. 17, 2009; USPTO; Alexandria, Virgina; All Pages.
LDR Medical, by its attorneys; Reply to Office Action in U.S. Appl. No. 11/341,007; Oct. 13, 2009; USPTO; Alexandria, Virgina; All Pages.
LDR Medical, by its attorneys; Reply to Office Action in U.S. Appl. No. 12/955,898; Apr. 19, 2012; USPTO; Alexandria, Virgina; All Pages.
U.S. Patent & Trademark Office; Office Action in U.S. Appl. No. 11/362,253; Mar. 8, 2011; USPTO; Alexandria, Virgina; All Pages.
LDR Medical by its attorneys; Appeal Brief in U.S. Appl. No. 11/362,253; Apr. 9, 2012; USPTO; Alexandria, Virgina; All Pages.
LDR Medical by its attorneys; Reply to Office Action in U.S. Appl. No. 11/362,253; Dec. 20, 2010; USPTO; Alexandria, Virgina; All Pages.
U.S. Patent & Trademark Office; Office Action in U.S. Appl. No. 11/362,253; Jun. 18, 2010; USPTO; Alexandria, Virgina; All Pages.
LDR Medical, by its attorneys; Reply to Office Action in U.S. Appl. No. 11/362,253; Apr. 15, 2010; USPTO; Alexandria, Virgina; All Pages.
U.S. Patent & Trademark Office; Office Action in U.S. Appl. No. 11/362,253; Oct. 15, 2009; USPTO; Alexandria, Virgina; All Pages.
U.S. Patent & Trademark Office; Office Action in U.S. Appl. No. 12/134,884; Jan. 31, 2012; USPTO; Alexandria, Virgina; All Pages.
U.S. Patent & Trademark Office; Office Action in U.S. Appl. No. 11/676,237; Feb. 16, 2012; USPTO; Alexandria, Virgina; All Pages.
LDR Medical, by its attorneys; Appeal Brief in U.S. Appl. No. 11/676,237; Oct. 17, 2011; USPTO; Alexandria, Virgina; All Pages.
U.S. Patent & Trademark Office; Office Action in U.S. Appl. No. 11/676,237; Sep. 15, 2010; USPTO; Alexandria, Virgina; All Pages.
LDR Medical, by its attorneys; Reply to Office Action in U.S. Appl. No. 11/676,237; Jun. 18, 2010; USPTO; Alexandria, Virgina; All Pages.
U.S. Patent & Trademark Office; Office Action in U.S. Appl. No. 11/676,237; Dec. 18, 2009; USPTO; Alexandria, Virgina; All Pages.
LDR Medical, by its attorneys; Reply to Office Action in U.S. Appl. No. 11/676,237; Sep. 21, 2009; USPTO; Alexandria, Virgina; All Pages.
U.S. Patent & Trademark Office; Office Action in U.S. Appl. No. 12/527,373; Dec. 12, 2011; USPTO; Alexandria, Virgina; All Pages.
World Intellectual Property Organization; International Preliminary Report on Patentability for PCT Pub'n No. WO2005074839; Jan. 16, 2006; WIPO; Geneva, Switzerland; all pages.
World Intellectual Property Organization; Written Opinon of the International Searching Authority for PCT Pub'n No. WO2005074839; Jun. 24, 2005; WIPO; Geneva, Switzerland; all pages.
World Intellectual Property Organization; International Preliminary Report on Patentability for PCT Pub'n No. WO2005104996; Jun. 28, 2006; WIPO; Geneva, Switzerland; all pages.
World Intellectual Property Organization; Written Opinon of the International Searching Authority for PCT Pub'n No. WO2005104996; Sep. 12, 2005; WIPO; Geneva, Switzerland; all pages.
National Institute of Industrial Property (France); Preliminary Search Report in Fench Pub. No. FR2879436; Aug. 11, 2005; National Institute of Industrial Property (France); France; all pages.
World Intellectual Property Organization; International Preliminary Report on Patentability for PCT Pub'n No. WO2006120505; Feb. 22, 2007; WIPO; Geneva, Switzerland; all pages.
World Intellectual Property Organization; International Search Report for PCT Pub'n No. WO2006120505; Aug. 21, 2006; WIPO; Geneva, Switzerland; all pages.
World Intellectual Property Organization; Written Opinon of the International Searching Authority for PCT Pub'n No. WO2006120505; Aug. 21, 2006; WIPO; Geneva, Switzerland; all pages.
National Institute of Industrial Property (France); Preliminary Search Report in Fench Pub. No. FR2887762; Dec. 21, 2005; National Institute of Industrial Property (France); France; all pages.
World Intellectual Property Organization; International Preliminary Report on Patentability for PCT Pub'n No. WO2007000654; Jul. 19, 2007; WIPO; Geneva, Switzerland; all pages.
World Intellectual Property Organization; International Search Report for PCT Pub'n No. WO2007000654; Mar. 14, 2007; WIPO; Geneva, Switzerland; all pages.
World Intellectual Property Organization; Written Opinon of the International Searching Authority for PCT Pub'n No. WO2007000654; Mar. 14, 2007; WIPO; Geneva, Switzerland; all pages.
National Institute of Industrial Property (France); Preliminary Search Report in Fench Pub. No. FR2891135; Jun. 27, 2006; National Institute of Industrial Property (France); France; all pages.
World Intellectual Property Organization; International Preliminary Report on Patentability for PCT Pub'n No. WO2007034310; Aug. 14, 2007; WIPO; Geneva, Switzerland; all pages.
World Intellectual Property Organization; International Search Report for PCT Pub'n No. WO2007034310; Feb. 13, 2007; WIPO; Geneva, Switzerland; all pages.
World Intellectual Property Organization; Written Opinon of the International Searching Authority for PCT Pub'n No. WO2007034310; Feb. 13, 2007; WIPO; Geneva, Switzerland; all pages.
National Institute of Industrial Property (France); Preliminary Search Report in Fench Pub. No. FR2893838; Aug. 4, 2006; National Institute of Industrial Property (France); France; all pages.
World Intellectual Property Organization; International Preliminary Report on Patentability for PCT Pub'n No. WO2007063398; Nov. 12, 2007; WIPO; Geneva, Switzerland; all pages.
World Intellectual Property Organization; International Search Report for PCT Pub'n No. WO2007063398; Jul. 13, 2007; WIPO; Geneva, Switzerland; all pages.
World Intellectual Property Organization; Written Opinon of the International Searching Authority for PCT Pub'n No. WO2007063398; Jul. 13, 2007; WIPO; Geneva, Switzerland; all pages.
National Institute of Industrial Property (France); Preliminary Search Report in Fench Pub. No. FR2916956; Jan. 30, 2008; National Institute of Industrial Property (France); France; all pages.
World Intellectual Property Organization; International Preliminary Report on Patentability for PCT Pub'n No. WO2008149223; Aug. 5, 2009; WIPO; Geneva, Switzerland; all pages.
World Intellectual Property Organization; International Search Report for PCT Pub'n No. WO2008149223; Oct. 31, 2008; WIPO; Geneva, Switzerland; all pages.
World Intellectual Property Organization; Written Opinon of the International Searching Authority for PCT Pub'n No. WO2008149223; Oct. 31, 2008; WIPO; Geneva, Switzerland; all pages.
World Intellectual Property Organization; International Search Report for PCT Pub'n No. WO2011080535; Jan. 24, 2011; WIPO; Geneva, Switzerland; all pages.
World Intellectual Property Organization; International Preliminary Report on Patentability for PCT Pub'n No. WO2008099277; May 29, 2009; WIPO; Geneva, Switzerland; all pages.
World Intellectual Property Organization; International Search Report for PCT Pub'n No. WO2008099277; Nov. 7, 2008; WIPO; Geneva, Switzerland; all pages.
World Intellectual Property Organization; Written Opinon of the International Searching Authority for PCT Pub'n No. WO2008099277; Nov. 7, 2008; WIPO; Geneva, Switzerland; all pages.
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20080234686 A1 Sep 2008 US
Continuations (1)
Number Date Country
Parent 10476565 US
Child 12025677 US