The present disclosure generally relates to a fixation device for positioning and immobilizing at least two adjacent vertebra. In particular, the present invention relates to a stand alone interbody fusion device for implementation in the spine.
The vertebral spine is the axis of the skeleton on which all of the body parts “hang”. In humans, the normal spine has seven cervical, twelve thoracic and five lumbar segments. The lumbar spine sits upon the sacrum, which then attaches to the pelvis, and in turn is supported by the hip and leg bones. The bony vertebral bodies of the spine are separated by intervertebral discs, which act as joints but allow known degrees of flexion, extension, lateral bending, and axial rotation and translation.
The typical vertebra has a thick anterior bone mass called the vertebral body, with a neural (vertebral) arch that arises from the posterior surface of the vertebral body. The central of adjacent vertebrae are supported by intervertebral discs. The spinal disc and/or vertebral bodies may be displaced or damaged due to trauma, disease, degenerative defects, or wear over an extended period of time. One result of this displacement or damage to a spinal disc or vertebral body may be chronic back pain. In many cases, to alleviate back pain from degenerated of herniated discs, the disc is removed along with all or part of at least one neighboring vertebrae and is replaced by an implant that promotes fusion of the remaining bony anatomy.
However, the success or failure of spinal fusion may depend upon several factors. For instance the spacer or implant or cage used to fill the space left by the removed disc and bony anatomy must be sufficiently strong to support the spine under a wide range of loading conditions. The spacer should also be configured so that it likely to remain in place once it has been positioned in the spine by the surgeon. Additionally the material used for the spacer should be biocompatible material and should have a configured that promotes bony ingrowth.
In combination with spacers or cages, a plating system is used to further stabilize the spine during the fusion process. These devices, commonly referred to as bone fixation plating systems, typically include one or more plates and screws for aligning and holding vertebrae in a fixed position with respect to one another. Plating systems independent of the spacers provide additional complications such as loosening and failure of the hardware. Two common failures are the breakage of the plates, and the backing out of screws into soft tissues of the patient's body. The backing out of the screws is typically a result of the screws failure to achieve a sufficient purchase in the bone, although the stripping of the screws has also been known to cause this problem. Another common problems is that plating systems require “carpentry” work to match fit aspects of the vertebral bodies.
There is a need for a spine stabilization system that in promotes fusion of adjacent vertebrae while at the same time provides stabilization of the spinal area where fusion occurs. There is a need for a system that incorporates both the fusion element and the plating element in one system to reduce the possible complications that may occur. There is also a need to provide a system that reduces the complications that may occur in the fusion element and the plating element and a need for this system to be configured so that positioning this system is efficient and easy.
The present invention provides an intervertebral implant for implantation in a treated area of an intervertebral space between vertebral bodies of a spine. The implant includes a spacer portion having an inferior and superior surface, wherein the inferior and superior surfaces each have a contact area capable of engaging with anatomy in the treated area, and the inferior and superior surfaces define a through-hole extending through the spacer body. The present invention further provides screw holes extending from a side portion to the inferior and superior surfaces of the spacer portion and a plate portion rigidly coupled to the spacer portion through a coupling means, wherein the plate portion contains screws holes for receiving screws. A screw back out prevention mechanism is adapted on the plate portion and prevents the back out of screws from the screw holes.
Embodiments of the disclosure are generally directed to flexible stabilization systems for use with the anterior, antero-lateral, lateral, and/or posterior portions of at least one motion segment unit of the spine. The systems of the invention are designed to be conformable to the spinal anatomy, so as to be generally less intrusive to surrounding tissue and vasculature than existing rigid stabilization systems.
Certain embodiments may be used on the cervical, thoracic, lumbar, and/or sacral segments of the spine. For example, the size and mass increase of the vertebrae in the spine from the cervical to the lumbar portions is directly related to an increased capacity for supporting larger loads. This increase in load bearing capacity, however, is paralleled by a decrease in flexibility and an increase in susceptibility to strain. When rigid immobilization systems are used in the lumbar segment, the flexibility is decreased even further beyond the natural motion restriction of that segment. Replacing the conventional rigid immobilization systems with certain embodiments disclosed herein may generally restore a more natural movement and provide added support to the strain-susceptible area.
The spacer portion 12 can be comprised of any material that is conducive to the enhancement of fusion between the two adjacent vertebrae. In one particular embodiment, the spacer portion 12 is made of PEEK material which is physiologically compatible. It should be noted that any other material that are physiologically compatible may also be used. The spacer portion 12 contains tantalum pins that enable radiographic visualization. The spacer portion 12 further comprises superior and inferior portions that are provided with a plurality of pyramidal protrusions 13. The superior and inferior portions of the spacer portion are bi-convex for greater contact with the vertebral endplates of the adjacent vertebrae. The protrusions 13 can be configured to be any size or shape for further anchoring the spacer portion 12 to each of the adjacent vertebrae. Protrusions 13 on the superior and inferior surfaces of each implant grip the endplates of the adjacent vertebrae to aid in expulsion resistance.
The plate portion 14 can also be comprised of any physiologically compatible material. In the preferred embodiment, the plate portion of the implant 10 is composed of titanium. The plate portion 14 as illustrated in
Now, turning to the method of positioning the implant, it should be noted that the intervertebral implant 10 is positioned in the spine after the disc portion between two vertebral bodies is exposed and removed using rongeurs and other suitable instruments. The posterior and lateral walls of the annulus are generally preserved to provide peripheral support for the implant and graft materials. A trial device attached to a trial holder is then inserted into the disc space to determine size of the implant. This procedure is generally conducted using fluoroscopy and tactile feel. After the appropriate sized implant is selected and attached to an implant holder and drill guide, the implant may be inserted into the disc space. Once the implant is positioned with the disc space, supplemental graft material can used to enhance fusion. Once the implant is positioned inside the disc, an awl or any similar type of instrument can be used to drill through the screw hole and break the cortex of the adjacent vertebral body. The surgeon performing this procedure may then use a depth gauge to determine the screw length. Once the appropriate screw length is determined, screws are inserted using a self-retaining screwdriver. After the screws are finally inserted and secured thereby providing solid purchase with the adjacent vertebral bodies, the screw anti-back out mechanism is engaged and secured. In this particular embodiment, the anti-back out mechanism is two set screws that retain the three screws with the implant. It should be noted that the implant may be implanted in the vertebral space using an anterior, posterior and/or lateral approach.
The spacer portion 33 of the implant provides a leading edge chamfer which enables self distraction of the vertebral bodies while inserting. The spacer portion 33 also provides teeth like structures in the superior and inferior aspects of the spacer body to help prevent migration of the implant. The root of the teeth or protrusions on the base of the implant serves as the defining plane for the superior and inferior vertebral bodies. Finally, the spacer portion 33 provides an axial shaped hole which enables a maximum amount of graft for packing within the implant. However, it should be noted that the graft hole can be designed to be multiple holes or any in other geometrical shape to enhance fusion through the insertion of graft material.
The plate portion 64 is configured with at least two screw holes for receiving screws 68. The screws 68 are positioned at angles to insert through the spacer and the adjacent vertebral body to gain maximum purchase and stability. The screws 68 are retained with the implant 60 through the use of an anti-screw back out mechanism 70. When this mechanism is engaged by turning at least 90 degrees through the use an instrument such as a screwdriver, the screws 68 are maintained within the implant and the boney structure of the adjacent vertebral bodies.
While it is apparent that the invention disclosed herein is well calculated to fulfill the objects stated above, it will be appreciated that numerous modifications and embodiments may be devised by those skilled in the art.
The present application is a continuation application of patent application Ser. No. 12/202,690 filed on Sep. 2, 2008, now U.S. Pat. No. 8,328,872 which is incorporated by its entirety herein.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1673630 | Madge | Jun 1928 | A |
4599086 | Doty | Jul 1986 | A |
4743256 | Brantigan | May 1988 | A |
4917704 | Frey | Apr 1990 | A |
4955908 | Frey | Sep 1990 | A |
5002576 | Fuhrmann et al. | Mar 1991 | A |
5364399 | Lowery et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
5397364 | Kozak et al. | Mar 1995 | A |
5514180 | Heggeness | May 1996 | A |
5888223 | Bray, Jr. | Mar 1999 | A |
6045579 | Hochshuler | Apr 2000 | A |
6146421 | Gordon | Nov 2000 | A |
6231610 | Geisler | May 2001 | B1 |
6235059 | Benezech | May 2001 | B1 |
6342074 | Simpson | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6364880 | Michelson | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6432106 | Fraser | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6471724 | Zdeblick | Oct 2002 | B2 |
6520993 | James | Feb 2003 | B2 |
6558387 | Errico | May 2003 | B2 |
6558423 | Michelson | May 2003 | B1 |
6562073 | Foley | May 2003 | B2 |
6629998 | Lin | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6682563 | Scharf | Jan 2004 | B2 |
6730127 | Michelson | May 2004 | B2 |
6793658 | Lehuec | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6805714 | Sutcliffe | Oct 2004 | B2 |
6835206 | Jackson | Dec 2004 | B2 |
6849093 | Michelson | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6887272 | Shinomiya | May 2005 | B2 |
7044972 | Mathys, Jr. | May 2006 | B2 |
7172627 | Fiere et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7192447 | Rhoda | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7232464 | Matthieu et al. | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7238203 | Bagga et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7594931 | Louis et al. | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7618456 | Matthieu | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7794502 | Michelson | Sep 2010 | B2 |
7846207 | Lechmann | Dec 2010 | B2 |
7850731 | Brittain | Dec 2010 | B2 |
7862616 | Lechmann | Jan 2011 | B2 |
7875076 | Matthieu | Jan 2011 | B2 |
7972381 | Michelson | Jul 2011 | B2 |
8105383 | Michelson | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8114162 | Bradley | Feb 2012 | B1 |
8328872 | Duffield et al. | Dec 2012 | B2 |
20010005796 | Zdeblick | Jun 2001 | A1 |
20010034553 | Michelson | Oct 2001 | A1 |
20020004683 | Michelson | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020082597 | Fraser | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020138146 | Jackson | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020143399 | Sutcliffe | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020147450 | LeHuec | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20030125739 | Bagga | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030181981 | Lemaire | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20040082998 | Shinomiya | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040082999 | Mathys, Jr. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040117018 | Michelson | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20050171607 | Michelson | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20060085071 | Lechmann et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20070106388 | Michelson | May 2007 | A1 |
20070250167 | Bray | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20100057206 | Duffield | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100145460 | Mcdonough | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20110087327 | Lechmann | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110251689 | Seifert | Oct 2011 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20120130495 A1 | May 2012 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 12202690 | Sep 2008 | US |
Child | 13363535 | US |