This application is the US national phase of PCT application PCT/DE2008/000072, filed 16 Jan. 2008, published 12 Sep. 2008 as WO2008/106912, and claiming the priority of German patent application 102007011059.8 itself filed 7 Mar. 2007, whose entire disclosures are herewith incorporated by reference.
The invention relates to an implant for installation between vertebrae of the spinal column, with an implant part having a first contact surface for bearing against one of the adjacent vertebrae and a second contact surface for bearing against the other adjacent vertebral body.
Implants of this type are known, for example, from DE 44 23 257 [U.S. Pat. No. 5,571,192] that describes a possible basic structure of the implant according to the invention. The same also applies to EP 1 721 583 [U.S. Pat. No. 6,752,832] that discloses an implant whose structure is suitable as a starting point for the invention.
With known implants to be inserted between the vertebrae of the spinal column, there is the problem with the embodiments hitherto known from the prior art that overloading of the vertebral end plates can occur, with the result that it can fracture and the vertebrae adjacent to the implant are thus also damaged or even destroyed.
The object of the invention is therefore to provide an implant of the type described above such that the strain on the vertebral end plates is reduced.
This object is attained according to the invention with an implant of the type described above in that at least one elastically compressible part is arranged between the bearing surfaces of the adjacent vertebrae in the force-transmission chain formed by the implant part.
This design results in the advantage that a uniform distribution of the load is achieved on the bearing surface of the vertebral end plates of the adjacent vertebrae, since the implant can adapt to the orientation of the bearing surfaces is made possible by the elastically compressible part. The contact surface is thereby enlarged and in particular one-sided line contact avoided, so that caving-in of the vertebral end plates cannot occur locally with a subsequently spreading break. The improved bearing of the implant parts against the adjacent vertebrae thereby also includes a configuration in which the implant part bends at in the elastically compressible part, that is, in principle a pivot is provided that furthermore also takes over the function of the intervertebral disks and cushions load peaks or impacts.
Within the scope of the invention it is preferred that the at least one elastically compressible part is assigned to the first contact surfaces and/or to the second contact surface, since uniform force distribution on the implant parts at the ends is thus realized, that is, in principle already known implant parts can be supplemented and further developed by the features according to the invention without having to change their basic construction.
There is thus the possibility thereby the elastically compressible part is formed from a solid elastic body, that is the elasticity is a property of the body. The behavior can be influenced in that lamellae are formed in the solid elastic body, the number, arrangement and design of the lamellae offering further parameters for the variation of its elasticity.
Alternatively, it is possible that the elastically compressible part is itself elastic, that is the material itself does not need to have the elastic properties in order to thus avoid a limitation of the material selection. As an example of a suitable elastic configuration of a material that is itself relatively rigid, reference can be made to a metal leaf spring.
It is very particularly preferred within the scope of the invention if several of the elastically compressible parts are provided distributed uniformly over the first contact surface and/or the second contact surface. With this design a uniform distribution of the load is achieved in a particularly simple manner, while at the same time making it possible to adjust to the locally given formations of the vertebral end plate, since each elastically compressible part can be deformed individually on its contact surface.
Furthermore, it is preferred within the scope of the invention if the implant part is formed as a tubular sleeve in whose wall the elastically compressible part is integrated. With this design, the elastically compressible part does not need to be positioned at the end of the implant part, which naturally additionally is likewise possible, but can release the end contact surfaces and provide the desired elasticity of the implant at any level along its longitudinal extension. There is therefore the possibility that the elastically compressible part is a honeycomb structure in the wall of the sleeve or that alternatively slots are formed in the wall of the sleeve in a crosswise offset arrangement. It is thereby suggested that two diametrically opposite slots are formed in a radial plane of the sleeve, the slots being offset by 90° to the longitudinal axis of the sleeve with respect to the slots in the adjacent radial planes, so that the desired elasticity can be produced subsequently by the formation of the slots in the wall of the sleeve. Another possibility is thereby given in that a coil spring is formed in the wall, but this is complex to produce with a one-part implant, so that in this case a multi-part embodiment seems logical.
In order to make individual adjustment of the implant possible for to the patients, end adapter plates are provided on the sleeve that form the first and second contact surfaces. There is also the possibility that the adapter plates form the elastically compressible parts so that as a result individual adjustment is made possible by a suitable selection of the design and material properties of the adapter plates.
Since the adapter plates can be produced separately from the sleeve, there is also the possibility of giving them density gradients extending longitudinally of the sleeve in order thus to achieve the desired elasticity.
Another alternative embodiment is characterized in that the adapter plates carry pins poking into a flexible pad, for bearing against the adjacent vertebrae so that a uniform bearing against the vertebral end plates is rendered possible in this manner.
It is possible to take into account the natural curvature of the spinal column when the end plates are hinged on the sleeve.
It is very particularly preferred within the scope of the invention if the implant part is formed in a multi-part manner with at least one first implant part and a second implant part that are adjustable with respect to one another along their longitudinal axis in order thus to create a traction option, that is, in a short configuration the implant can be simply inserted into the existing gap between the two vertebrae in order to be subsequently distracted in the course of the operation. The adjustability along the longitudinal axis can thereby be achieved in a particularly simple manner in that the first implant part and the second implant part are connected to one another by a distraction screwthread, reference can be made to the printed publications of the same applicant cited above for the making the distraction screwthread.
The invention is explained in more detail below based on the illustrated embodiments shown in the drawing; therein:
The implant 1 shown in the drawing serves for installation between vertebrae 2 of the spinal column shown in the drawing itself only in
Alternatively, there is also the possibility that the implant 1 has two end parts and one central part, the latter connected to the end implant parts via screwthreads of opposite hand. Although implants 1 of at least two implant parts 3 and 4 are always shown in the drawing to describe the illustrated embodiments, in principle the invention can be an implant 1 with only one implant part, but this then lacks the distraction possibility.
This one-part or multi-part implant part 3 and 4 has a first contact surface 9 for bearing against one of the adjacent vertebrae 2 and a second contact surface 10 for bearing against the other adjacent vertebral body, at least one part 11 being elastically compressible between the bearing surfaces of the adjacent vertebrae 2 in the force-transmission chain formed by the implant part 3 and 4, which part in the embodiment shown in
It is therefore possible that the elastically compressible part 11 is formed from an elastically compact material 15 having lamellae 12. Another possibility is that the elastically compressible part 11 is provided in an elastic configuration (
Furthermore, it should be pointed out that end adapter plates 15 can be assigned to the sleeves 6, which adapter plates form the first contact surface 9 and the second contact surface 10, the adapter plates 15 being also usable for forming the elastically compressible part 11, that can have, for example, a density gradient extending longitudinally of the sleeve 6 (
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
10 2007 011 059 | Mar 2007 | DE | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/DE2008/000072 | 1/16/2008 | WO | 00 | 7/29/2009 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2008/106912 | 9/12/2008 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4608053 | Keller | Aug 1986 | A |
5320644 | Baumgartner | Jun 1994 | A |
5571192 | Schonhoffer | Nov 1996 | A |
5827328 | Buttermann | Oct 1998 | A |
6136031 | Middleton | Oct 2000 | A |
6143031 | Knothe et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6200348 | Biedermann | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6296664 | Middleton | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6395035 | Bresina et al. | May 2002 | B2 |
6579321 | Gordon et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6582468 | Gauchet | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6752832 | Neumann | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6808538 | Paponneau | Oct 2004 | B2 |
7758646 | Khandkar | Jul 2010 | B2 |
20010016774 | Bresina et al. | Aug 2001 | A1 |
20010051829 | Middleton | Dec 2001 | A1 |
20040186569 | Berry | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040210312 | Neumann | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040220671 | Ralph et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20050004572 | Biedermann et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050113924 | Buttermann | May 2005 | A1 |
20050187627 | Ralph et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20060058877 | Gutlin et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060089714 | Liu et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060100710 | Gutlin et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060116767 | Magerl et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060116769 | Marnay et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060178744 | de Villiers et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060200240 | Rothman et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060282166 | Molz | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070050032 | Gittings et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070179618 | Trieu et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
20019520 | Mar 2001 | DE |
0985384 | Mar 2000 | EP |
2734148 | Nov 1996 | FR |
WO 2005039454 | May 2005 | WO |
WO 2005039455 | May 2005 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20100016969 A1 | Jan 2010 | US |