This application claims priority to European Patent Application No. 12155953.8, filed Feb. 17, 2012, which is hereby incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.
The present invention relates to the general field of orthopedic surgical implants.
In particular, the invention relates to an intervertebral implant permitting the fusion between two vertebral bodies of a vertebral column, used in the field of surgical spine treatment.
More specifically, the implant is preferably intended to be used as stand-alone intervertebral body fusion device for Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion (ALIF).
The ALIF approach is a surgical technique mainly used to operate a damaged disk in the lumbar area of the spine. The operation involves approaching the spine through an incision in the abdomen, removing the damaged disk and substituting it with a suitable intervertebral implant.
The intervertebral implant mainly comprises a hollow cage, which is inserted between the two vertebral bodies and filled with autogenic bone graft or the like in order to promote bone growth and eventual fusion of the two bodies.
Moreover, the implant comprises a fixing plate solidly attached to the hollow cage. The fixing plate may or may not protrude out of the intervertebral space and is fixed to the anterior sides of the two adjacent vertebral bodies, usually by means of two or more bone screws. The main function of the fixing plate and screws is that of improving primal stability of the whole implant.
It should be noted that the fixing plate is preferably formed as a separate piece and subsequently mounted on the anterior side of the fusion cage.
Such a design solution provides two different advantages.
Firstly, such a design gives the opportunity of manufacturing the fusion cage and the fixing plate out of different materials: usually the cage, which is required to be radiolucent, is made out of PEEK material, while the plate is made out of titanium.
Secondly, thanks to the two-pieces design the implant may be assembled by the surgeon right before the operation. In such a way, the fixing plate may be conveniently selected out of a set of different plates adapted to different surgical requirements.
It should be stressed that, in implants of the above kind, the role of the fastening system used for mounting the fixing plate on the fusion cage is critical, since its design derives from a trade-off between a plurality of conflicting needs.
Firstly, the fastening system should be easily operated, so that the surgeon may mount the final implant without wasting unnecessary time or energy. Possibly, the final mounting should be possible even when the fusion cage has been already positioned between the intervertebral space of the patient.
Secondly, the fastening system should be integrated within the dimensions of a standard intervertebral implant. In this respect, cumbersome designs should be avoided and the system should be kept as simple as possible.
Thirdly, the fastening system should provide an adequate primal stability to the implant. The fixing plate should be solidly attached to the fusion cage and the risk of a post-operational slip or disengagement should be minimized.
Several systems have been proposed in the prior art to mount the fixing plate on the fusion cage, based for instance on mortise and tenon or button-like fasteners. Those known systems are disclosed for instance in the following European patents and patent applications: EP 0 79 695, EP 0 891 169, EP 1 103 236, EP 1 476 098 and EP 1 589 909. Nonetheless, all of these system present drawbacks with respect to one or more of the above-listed requirements.
In view of the foregoing, the technical problem underlying the present invention is to provide an intervertebral implant with a two-pieces design whereas the system for fastening the fixing plate on the fusion cage overcomes the drawbacks of the prior art solutions.
The abovementioned technical problem is solved by an intervertebral implant for the fusion between two vertebral bodies of a vertebral column comprising:
The restraining means may advantageously comprise at least one protruding portion, radially extending with respect to said pivot axis, and at least one recessed portion intended to house said protruding portion in the second configuration of the implant.
The cooperating feature may advantageously comprise a bulging head and a housing cavity for housing said bulging head, the protruding portion being provided on a lateral edge of the bulging head, the recessed portion being provided on a lateral edge of the housing cavity.
Advantageously, two protruding portions may be provided on the two opposite lateral edges of the bulging head, two recessed portions being provided on the two opposite lateral edges of the housing cavity.
The bulging head may advantageously be integral with the fixing plate, the housing cavity being provided on the fusion cage.
The bulging head may be rotatably coupled to the housing cavity by means of the pivoting means, said pivoting means comprising a centering pin rotatably inserted in a corresponding centering hole.
The centering pin may project from the bulging head, the centering hole being provided on the bottom of the housing cavity. Obviously, an alternative and opposite construction may be provided with the centering pin projecting from the housing cavity and the centering hole formed in the bulging head.
The recessed portion may advantageously define a slideway in which the protruding portion slidably engages during rotation of the fixing plate from the first to the second configuration.
The recessed portion and the protruding portion may be dovetailed in cross section.
The slideway defined by the recessed portion may comprise an abutment intended to block the rotation of the fixing plate with respect to the fusion cage upon reaching the second configuration.
The profile of the recessed portion and the profile of the protruding portion may comprise local features designed to cooperate in order to determine a snap fit of the fixing plate upon reaching the second configuration.
The above-mentioned local features may comprise a locking recess on the profile of the recessed portion and a locking protrusion on the profile of the protruding portion.
The fusion cage may be conveniently made out of radiolucent material, for instance PEEK.
The fixing plate may be conveniently made of a material different from that of the fusion cage, for instance titanium.
The fixing plate may be advantageously selected among a plurality of fixing plates having different geometries.
Further features and advantages of the intervertebral implant according to the invention shall be made clearer by the description, given herein below, of a specific embodiment described by way of non-limiting example with reference to the accompanying drawings.
Referring to
The intervertebral implant 100 comprises a fusion cage 1, depicted alone in
The intervertebral implant 100 may further comprise four bone screws 3, one of which is depicted in
The fusion cage 1, intended to be inserted within the intervertebral space of a patient, features four walls of uniform height raising from a substantially rectangular base and enclosing a central hole 6.
The posterior side of the fusion cage 1, which is the side inserted between the vertebral bodies, exhibit rounded edges, while the anterior side, which has to be coupled with the fixing plate 2, has straight edges.
The central hole 6, extending in caudal-cranial direction, is intended to be filled with material for bone growth promotion, such as autogenic bone graft. The caudal and cranial cage surface are advantageously covered by a toothed pattern in order to improve primal stability.
The anterior side of the fusion cage 1 exhibits a housing cavity 21, roughly rectangular in size, extending along the whole height of the fusion cage. The structure and function of the housing cavity 21 will be further discussed into detail in connection to the fixing plate 2.
The anterior side of the fusion cage 1 further exhibits two anti-rotation blind holes 5, opening at different heights on the two side portions of the anterior surface bordering the housing cavity 21. The scope of this holes is just for a use by a removable installation instrument.
The anterior wall of the fusion cage 1 exhibits four apertures 11 opening on the bottom of the housing cavity 21 and reaching the central hole 6. Two of them apertures 11 open on the caudal surface, while the other two open on the cranial surface of the cage. Such apertures 11 are provided to allow the passage of bone screws 3 the head of which is blocked on the fixing plate 2, as illustrated, for example, in
The bottom surface of the housing cavity further exhibits a centering hole 10, the function of which will be readily apparent from the following description.
The fusion cage 1 is made out of biocompatible material, for instance PEEK, CFRP or titanium, with or without a coating, for example a titanium or hydroxyapatite coating could be provided even if other coating may be used. Three radiopaque markers 12 are embedded in the PEEK structure in order to control the exact positioning of the implant with X-Rays; two of the markers 12 cross the lateral walls of the fusion cage in a caudal-cranial direction, while the third marker 12 crosses the posterior wall following an anterior-posterior direction.
A first, preferred embodiment of the fixing plate 2 has a substantially rectangular planar structure, the perimeter of which matches that of the anterior side of the fusion cage 1. In particular, the height of the plate 2 matches the height of the fusion cage 1.
The fixing plate 2 exhibits four passageways 16 running from its anterior to its posterior side.
The passageways 16 are symmetrically arranged in couples; two central passageways are inclined upwards (i.e. towards the cranial direction), the other two lateral passageways are inclined downwards (i.e. towards the caudal direction).
When the fixing plate 2 is correctly attached to the fusion cage 1, the apertures 11 are aligned with the passageways 16 and may be traversed for instance by the bone screws 3.
On its anterior side, the fixing plate 2 has a central threaded hole 15 which is placed slightly below the opening of the two central passageways 16. The threaded hole 15 serves the purpose of temporarily coupling the fixing plate 2 with a surgical instrument for placing the implant during the surgical operation.
The fixing plate 2 also features anti-rotation through bores 14. The anti-rotation through bores 14, opening laterally with respect to the lateral passageways 16, cross the plate from side to side and align with the anti-rotation blind holes 5 of the fusion cage 1 when the fixing plate 2 is correctly mounted hereon.
On its posterior side, the fixing plate 2 has a bulging head 20 protruding in posterior direction. The bulging head 20 is meant to be housed within the housing cavity of the fusion cage 1, and therefore has a similar rectangular shape. The height of the bulging head 20 equals the height of the fusion cage 1. Since in the embodiment herein described the fixing plate 2 also shares the same height with the fusion cage 1, the posterior side of the fixing plate 2 only has two lateral planes aside from the bulging head 20.
A centering pin 19 orthogonally extends from the posterior surface of the bulging head 20; such a centering pin 19 is meant to be inserted in the centering hole 10 realized on the fusion cage 1. Obviously, an alternative and opposite construction may be provided with the centering pin 19 projecting from the fusion cage and the centering hole 10 formed in the bulging head 20.
The pin inserted in the hole determines a pivot axis x, lying on the sagittal mid-plane of the fusion cage 1, toward the caudal side. In other words, the pin 19 and the hole 10 may be considered a fast on or a bayonet coupling.
The two lateral edges of the bulging head 20 present a protruding portion 7, extending radially with respect to the pivot axis x. The two protruding portions 7 have a dovetailed cross section, which is tapered toward the posterior direction.
On the other hand, the two opposite lateral edges of the housing cavity 21 feature a recessed portion 8, which is counter-shaped with respect to the corresponding protruding portion 7 and adapted to house it.
Moving further into detail, it should be noted that the recessed portion 8 define a slideway into which the corresponding protruding portion 7 enters when the bulging head 20 is rotated about the pivot axis x with respect to the housing cavity 21.
From the description above, one can clearly understand how the fixing plate 2 is blocked on the fusion cage 1.
Firstly, the fixing plate 2 being kept inclined with respect to the fusion cage 1, the centering pin 19 is inserted within the centering hole 10. Such a configuration, depicted in
Secondly, the fixing plate 2 is rotated about the pivot axis x determined by the centering pin 19 and hole 10. During the rotation, the protruding portions 7 of the bulging head 20 slidably engage in the slideway defined by the recessed portion 8 of the housing cavity 21.
The rotation is carried on upon reaching a second configuration, depicted for instance in
The second configuration is the operative configuration of the device; only when the implant 100 is in its second configuration the bone screw 3 may be introduced into the appropriate passageways 16.
It should be noted that, in order to allow the slidable engagement between the protruding portions 7 and the recessed portions 8, the profile of said portions should at least partially follow that of a circumference centered in the pivot axis x.
However, one of the recessed portions 8 has a profile end 4 deviating from said circumference in order to define an abutment 22. The profile of the corresponding protruding portions 7 is of course counter-shaped and deviates in a similar way.
The abutment 22 is intended to first guide and then to stop or block the rotation of the fixing plate with respect to the fusion cage upon reaching the second configuration. The profile of this abutment is carefully designed in order to implement both the above mentioned function of guiding and stopping.
Moreover, both the protruding portions 7 locally feature a locking protrusion 18 along their profile, while the recessed portions 8 similarly feature a counter-shaped locking recess 9.
The locking protrusions 18 and recesses 9 are designed to cooperate with each other in order to determine a snap fit of the fixing plate 2 upon reaching the second configuration.
The fixing plate 2 is conveniently realized with a biocompatible metal, for instance PEEK, CFRP, titanium or with another alternative material suitable for implantable medical devices.
Instead of the fixing plate 2 described above, the surgeon may select a an alternative fixing plate 2a, 2b, 2c adapted to the specific need of the operation.
In
In a second embodiment, the fixing plate 2a has four passageways 16a all arranged on the same side of the device, so that all screw may be inserted from this side therefore reducing the size of the surgical incision needed. An alternative configuration with only two passageways 16a may be used as well.
In a third embodiment, the fixing plate 2b has four lobes featuring the passageways 16b. The device is intended for increased stability of the implant.
In a fourth embodiment, the fixing plate 2c has an upper lobe and two lower lobes, each of them featuring a passageway 16c. Such a device is specifically designed for fusing together the vertebrae L5 and S1.
It should be noted that all alternative embodiments for the fixing plate 2a, 2b, 2c feature a bulging head 20 of the above-described type, allowing them to be coupled to the same fusion cage. In particular, alternative kind of screws may be used such as locking screws, poly-axial screws or even compression screws together with their relating security mechanisms.
Obviously a person skilled in the art, in order to meet specific needs, will readily acknowledge the possibility of changes and variations to the intervertebral implant described above, all comprised within the scope of protection defined by the following claims.
For instance, even if the preferred embodiment previously described is designed to be used as stand-alone intervertebral body fusion device for Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion, a person skilled in the art will readily acknowledge that the same solution can be used for different kind of intervertebral implants, for instance: anterior cervical intervertebral body fusion devices, extreme lateral intervertebral body fusion devices, or posterior intervertebral body fusion devices. The number of screws employed will obvious change in respect to the approach/implant design: in an extreme lateral cage and in a cervical cage two screws are more favorable than four screws. The implant geometry will also change in respect to the approach.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
12155953 | Feb 2012 | EP | regional |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5683394 | Rinner | Nov 1997 | A |
6156037 | LeHuec et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6235059 | Benezech et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6648715 | Wiens et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6699288 | Moret | Mar 2004 | B2 |
7112222 | Fraser et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7172627 | Fiere et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7621938 | Molz, IV | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7740662 | Barnett et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
8025684 | Garcia-Bengochea et al. | Sep 2011 | B2 |
8100975 | Waugh et al. | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8328872 | Duffield et al. | Dec 2012 | B2 |
8480747 | Melkent et al. | Jul 2013 | B2 |
20040193269 | Fraser et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20060085071 | Lechmann | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20080161925 | Brittan et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080300634 | Gray | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090005874 | Fleischmann et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090210064 | Lechmann et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20100030334 | Molz, IV | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100312346 | Kueenzi | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110040382 | Muhanna | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20120109313 | Mathieu et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120143336 | Aflatoon et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20130053894 | Gamache et al. | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130060337 | Petersheim et al. | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130238095 | Pavento et al. | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20130310937 | Pimenta | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20130345814 | Walkenhorst et al. | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20140107786 | Geisler et al. | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140194994 | Duffield et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140214166 | Theofilos | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20150320571 | Lechmann et al. | Nov 2015 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1053004 | Jul 1991 | CN |
101068513 | Nov 2007 | CN |
102038563 | May 2011 | CN |
0079695 | May 1983 | EP |
1103236 | May 2001 | EP |
1834608 | Sep 2007 | EP |
2628466 | Aug 2013 | EP |
2628467 | Aug 2013 | EP |
2 747 034 | Oct 1997 | FR |
2457673 | Aug 2009 | GB |
2012501744 | Jan 2012 | JP |
20040069106 | Aug 2004 | WO |
2007065993 | Jun 2007 | WO |
2008102174 | Aug 2008 | WO |
2010107692 | Sep 2010 | WO |
2013134210 | Dec 2013 | WO |
Entry |
---|
European Search Report / EP 12 15 5953 completed Aug. 3, 2012 in Berlin. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20130218276 A1 | Aug 2013 | US |