The present invention relates to an intervertebral implant.
Such an intervertebral implant is known from the British patent document 2,207,607 A which discloses a horseshoe implant structure having a plurality of cylindrical holes. These holes are fitted with inner, smooth surfaces and comprise only one stop for the heads of the bone screws to be inserted into them. This design incurs the drawback that the inserted affixation screws may be anchored into the bone only by their shanks, a rigid connection with the horseshoe shaped intervertebral implant being lacking. As soon as the anchoring of the bone screw in the bone is weakened, the intervertebral implant becomes displaceable relative to the screw and the bone screws may then migrate while endangering the blood vessels. Moreover the loosening of the intervertebral implant may entail pseudoarthrosis.
The above cited state of the art is intended merely to elucidate the background of the present invention but it does imply that the cited state of the art had actually been made public or was publicly known at the time of this application or at the time of its priority.
The objective of the present invention is palliation. This invention creates an intervertebral implant which is able to rigidly connect to bone affixation means in a manner that even in the event of bone structure weakening, loosening between the intervertebral implant and the bone affixation means shall be precluded.
The above problem is solved in the present invention by an intervertebral implant exhibiting the features of claim 1.
The advantages offered by the present invention substantially are attained by the rigid, that is by the firm connection between the intervertebral implant and the longitudinal affixing elements. Basically two different embodiment modes are available to attain said rigid connection.
In a first embodiment mode, at least one of the boreholes shall be internally threaded. In this case a matching bone screw fitted with a thread head may be rigidly screwed into the implant.
As regards a second embodiment mode, a front plate is mounted at the front surface of the three dimensional (3D) implant structure so as to be configured vertically to the horizontal center plane of the intervertebral implant, said boreholes passing through said front plate and receiving the anchored longitudinal affixation elements. Compared to the state of the art of a two-part implant, wherein a front plate is implanted in a separate operational step, the above design of the present invention offers the advantage that the intervertebral implant shall be implanted in a single step and hence in a simple and quicker manner. The invention offers a further advantage in that the intervertebral implant shall be affixed as frontally to the vertebra as possible, namely at a place where good bone material may be expected to be. As a result anterior displacement is restricted without thereby incurring greater danger to the surrounding structures than when using a state of the art intervertebral implant. The load still is being borne by the compressed vertebral implant, not by the front plate or the affixation screws.
In yet another embodiment mode of the present invention, the front plate is displaceably configured in the 3D implant structure in order that it may move vertically relative to this 3D implant structure. “Stress shielding” is attained in this manner (namely protection from or neutralization of mechanical stresses), and as a result the end plates may gradually match the intervertebral implant during the healing process.
As regards a further embodiment, the front plate is made of a material different from that of the 3D implant structure.
As regards a further embodiment of the present invention, at least one borehole tapers conically towards its underside and as a result a bone screw fitted with a matching conical head may be rigidly anchored in said borehole. Preferably the conical borehole exhibits a cone angle smaller than the resultant angle of friction. Appropriately the borehole's conicity shall be 1:3.75 to 1:20, preferably 1:5 to 1:15.
As regards a further embodiment mode of the present invention, the intervertebral implant side faces shall all be substantially convex.
Appropriately the intervertebral implant's top and/or undersides are not planar but convex. In this manner better matching to the end plates of the adjacent vertebras may be attained.
The boreholes preferably shall not pass through the left and right intervertebral implant side faces. Preferably again no borehole shall run through the rear surface.
As regards a further preferred embodiment mode of the present invention, at least two boreholes shall be mutually parallel. This features facilitates inserting the vertebral implant during implantation.
As regards another preferred embodiment mode of the present invention, at least two boreholes shall run in mutually divergent manner as seen from the front side. As a result the bone screws shall move into a vertebral region offering better bone quality than found at the vertebra's center. Appropriately the borehole axes subtend an angle of 25° to 70°, preferably 35° to 55° with the horizontal center plane. This feature offers improved access for screw insertion.
As regards a further embodiment mode of the present invention, the boreholes shall not cross the horizontal center plane.
Depending on circumstance, two, three, four or even more longitudinal affixation elements may rigidly connected to the intervertebral implant; appropriately at least one affixation element shall pass through the top side and at least one affixation element shall pass through the intervertebral implant side.
Preferably the longitudinal affixation elements shall be bone screws comprising a head and a shank, said head preferably being fitted with an external thread that matches the inner thread of the intervertebral implant's borehole. As regards a second appropriate connection, preferably a bone screw shall be used of which the head tapers conically in the direction of the shank, the head's conicity corresponding to that of the intervertebral implant's borehole.
Regarding a further embodiment mode, at least two longitudinal affixation elements pass through the top side and at least two longitudinal affixation elements pass through the underside. In this manner the intervertebral implant is optimally anchored into the adjacent vertebras.
Preferably the screw-shaped longitudinal affixation elements exhibit a self-boring and self-tapping external thread. The longitudinal affixation elements also may be designed as unthreaded cylindrical pins fitted with a boring tip, preferably in the form of a trocar.
In another embodiment variation, the longitudinal affixation elements are spiral springs; lastly said longitudinal affixation elements also may be designed as single or multi-wing spiral blades.
In a further embodiment mode of the present invention, the longitudinal affixation element tip may be anchored in the structure of the intervertebral implant, as a result of which the head of the longitudinal affixation element may be anchored in the adjacent vertebra.
In a further embodiment mode of the present invention, the longitudinal affixation element head exhibits a widened diameter; also a support disk is provided for said head to rest against the vertebra.
The intervertebral implant may be made of any physiologically compatible material, though appropriately the implant structure shall consist of a physiologically compatible plastic, preferably an unreinforced plastic. The advantage offered by the invention over the already known, fiber-reinforced plastics used in implantology is that no reinforcing fibers will be bared—an eventuality that would be clinically disadvantageous. Appropriately bone screws consisting of non-reinforced plastic of which the external threads exhibit load bevels of 11° to 14°, preferably 12° to 13°, may be used in such an implant structure. The relatively small slope of the load bevel implements high clamping forces, as a result of which radial elongation and danger of cracking of the plastic are reduced. Appropriately the bone screws' external thread exhibits the bones at an angular pitch of 6° to 10°, preferably 7° to 9°. This particular angular pitch produces thread self-locking and prevents the bone screw from loosening on its own.
The borehole may be in the form of a metal bush fitted with an inner thread for the purpose of improving anchoring the bone screw in the plastic implant structure. The intervertebral implant also may consist partly of plastic and, in the borehole zones, of metal. This design offers improved guidance and anchoring of the bone screw in the intervertebral implant.
As regards a further preferred embodiment mode, the inside borehole walls are smooth, the thread head of a metallic, longitudinal affixation element cutting or tapping into said smooth wall.
The present invention and further embodiment modes of it are elucidated below in relation to the partly schematic representation of two illustrative embodiments.
The intervertebral implant of
The 3D implant structure 10 moreover comprises a left side face 3 and a right side face 4, also a front face 5 and a rear face 6. The implant structure 10 also may be hollow and its outer surface may comprise perforations.
The implant structure 10 comprises a plurality of boreholes 9 passing through it and receiving longitudinal affixation elements 20. Preferably four such boreholes 9 shall be provided.
At least one of the boreholes 9 is designed in a way that the longitudinal affixation element 20 received therein may be rigidly connected to the intervertebral implant. The boreholes 9 are conical for that purpose.
Preferably the affixation elements 20 are bone screws having a head 21 and a tip 22. The head 21 conically tapers toward the shank 23, the conicity of the head 21 corresponding to the conicity of the borehole 9. Moreover the four boreholes 9 may be fitted with inner threads 11.
As regards the embodiment variation shown in
While the invention has been shown and described herein with reference to particular embodiments, it is to be understood that the various additions, substitutions, or
modifications of form, structure, arrangement, proportions, materials, and components and otherwise, used in the practice and which are particularly adapted to specific environments and operative requirements, may be made to the described embodiments without departing from the spirit and scope of the present invention. Accordingly, it should be understood that the embodiments disclosed herein are merely illustrative of the principles of the invention. Various other modifications may be made by those skilled in the art which will embody the principles of the invention and fall within the spirit and the scope thereof.
This is a continuation of International Application No. PCT/CH02/00099, filed Feb. 19, 2002, the entirety of which is expressly incorporated by reference herein.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2621145 | Sano | Dec 1952 | A |
4135506 | Ulrich | Jan 1979 | A |
4501269 | Bagby | Feb 1985 | A |
4512038 | Alexander et al. | Apr 1985 | A |
4627853 | Campbell et al. | Dec 1986 | A |
4678470 | Nashef et al. | Jul 1987 | A |
4717115 | Schmitz | Jan 1988 | A |
4858603 | Clemow et al. | Aug 1989 | A |
4904261 | Dove et al. | Feb 1990 | A |
4936851 | Fox et al. | Jun 1990 | A |
4950296 | McIntyre | Aug 1990 | A |
4961740 | Ray et al. | Oct 1990 | A |
4994084 | Brennan | Feb 1991 | A |
5026373 | Ray et al. | Jun 1991 | A |
5053049 | Campbell | Oct 1991 | A |
5062850 | MacMillan et al. | Nov 1991 | A |
5084051 | Törmälä et al. | Jan 1992 | A |
5112354 | Sires | May 1992 | A |
5192327 | Brantigan | Mar 1993 | A |
5211664 | Tepic et al. | May 1993 | A |
5281226 | Davydov et al. | Jan 1994 | A |
5284655 | Bogdansky et al. | Feb 1994 | A |
5298254 | Prewett et al. | Mar 1994 | A |
5314476 | Prewett et al. | May 1994 | A |
5348788 | White | Sep 1994 | A |
5405391 | Hednerson et al. | Apr 1995 | A |
5423817 | Lin | Jun 1995 | A |
5439684 | Prewett et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
5458638 | Kuslich et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
5489308 | Kuslich et al. | Feb 1996 | A |
5507818 | McLaughlin | Apr 1996 | A |
5514180 | Heggeness et al. | May 1996 | A |
5522899 | Michelson | Jun 1996 | A |
5534030 | Navarro et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5549679 | Kuslich | Aug 1996 | A |
5554191 | Lahille et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
5556430 | Gendler | Sep 1996 | A |
5569308 | Sottosanti | Oct 1996 | A |
5571190 | Ulrich et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
5571192 | Schönhöffer | Nov 1996 | A |
5607474 | Athanasiou et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
5609635 | Michelson | Mar 1997 | A |
5609636 | Kohrs et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
5609637 | Biedermann et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
5676699 | Gogolewski | Oct 1997 | A |
5683394 | Rinner | Nov 1997 | A |
5683463 | Godefroy et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
5702449 | McKay | Dec 1997 | A |
5702451 | Biedermann et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5702453 | Rabbe et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5702455 | Saggar | Dec 1997 | A |
5728159 | Stroever et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5735905 | Parr | Apr 1998 | A |
5766253 | Brosnahan, III | Jun 1998 | A |
5776194 | Mikol et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5776197 | Rabbe et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5776198 | Rabbe et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5776199 | Michelson | Jul 1998 | A |
5782915 | Stone | Jul 1998 | A |
5785710 | Michelson | Jul 1998 | A |
5865849 | Stone | Feb 1999 | A |
5876452 | Athanasiou et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5885299 | Winslow et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5888222 | Coates et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5888224 | Beckers et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5888227 | Cottle | Mar 1999 | A |
5895426 | Scarborough et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
5899939 | Boyce et al. | May 1999 | A |
5902338 | Stone | May 1999 | A |
5904719 | Errico et al. | May 1999 | A |
5910315 | Stevenson et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5922027 | Stone | Jul 1999 | A |
5944755 | Stone | Aug 1999 | A |
5968098 | Winslow | Oct 1999 | A |
5972368 | McKay | Oct 1999 | A |
5976187 | Richelsoph | Nov 1999 | A |
5980522 | Koros et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5981828 | Nelson et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5984967 | Zdeblick et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5989289 | Coates et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6013853 | Athanasiou et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6025538 | Yaccarino, III | Feb 2000 | A |
6033405 | Winslow et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6033438 | Bianchi et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6039762 | McKay | Mar 2000 | A |
6045579 | Hochshuler et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6045580 | Scarborough et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6080158 | Lin | Jun 2000 | A |
6080193 | Hochshuler et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6090998 | Grooms et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6096081 | Grivas et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6110482 | Khouri et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6123731 | Boyce et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6129763 | Chauvin et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6143030 | Schroder | Nov 2000 | A |
6143033 | Paul et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6156070 | Incavo et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6193756 | Studer et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6200347 | Anderson et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6206922 | Zdeblick et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6231610 | Geisler | May 2001 | B1 |
6235059 | Benezech et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6241769 | Nicholson et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6245108 | Biscup | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6258125 | Paul et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6261586 | McKay | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6264695 | Stoy | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6270528 | McKay | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6342074 | Simpson | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6364880 | Michelson | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6423063 | Bonutti | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6458158 | Anderson et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6468311 | Boyd et al. | Oct 2002 | B2 |
6569201 | Moumene et al. | May 2003 | B2 |
6638310 | Lin et al. | Oct 2003 | B2 |
6761739 | Shepard | Jul 2004 | B2 |
6984234 | Bray | Jan 2006 | B2 |
20010001129 | McKay et al. | May 2001 | A1 |
20010005796 | Zdeblick et al. | Jun 2001 | A1 |
20010010021 | Boyd et al. | Jul 2001 | A1 |
20010016777 | Biscup | Aug 2001 | A1 |
20010031254 | Bianchi et al. | Oct 2001 | A1 |
20010039456 | Boyer, II et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20010041941 | Boyer, II et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20020010511 | Michelson | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020029084 | Paul et al. | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020082597 | Fraser | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020091447 | Shimp et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020106393 | Bianchi et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020111680 | Michelson | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20030125739 | Bagga et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20040210314 | Michelson | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20050033433 | Michelson | Feb 2005 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2317791 | Aug 1999 | CA |
30 42 003 | Jul 1982 | DE |
39 33 459 | Apr 1991 | DE |
42 42 889 | Jun 1994 | DE |
44 09 392 | Sep 1995 | DE |
44 23 257 | Jan 1996 | DE |
195 04 867 | Feb 1996 | DE |
299 13 200 | Sep 1999 | DE |
0505634 | Sep 1992 | EP |
0517030 | Dec 1992 | EP |
0517030 | Apr 1993 | EP |
0577178 | Jan 1994 | EP |
0639351 | Feb 1995 | EP |
0639351 | Mar 1995 | EP |
0517030 | Sep 1996 | EP |
0505634 | Aug 1997 | EP |
0966930 | Dec 1999 | EP |
0968692 | Jan 2000 | EP |
0906065 | Jan 2004 | EP |
1051133 | Oct 2004 | EP |
2 552 659 | Apr 1985 | FR |
2 697 996 | May 1994 | FR |
2 700 947 | Aug 1994 | FR |
2 753 368 | Mar 1998 | FR |
2 148 122 | May 1985 | GB |
1465040 | Mar 1989 | SU |
WO 8803417 | May 1988 | WO |
WO 8810100 | Dec 1988 | WO |
WO 9201428 | Feb 1992 | WO |
WO 9521053 | Aug 1995 | WO |
WO 9639988 | Dec 1996 | WO |
WO 9720526 | Jun 1997 | WO |
WO 9725941 | Jul 1997 | WO |
WO 9725945 | Jul 1997 | WO |
WO 9739693 | Oct 1997 | WO |
WO 9817209 | Apr 1998 | WO |
WO 9855052 | Dec 1998 | WO |
WO 9856319 | Dec 1998 | WO |
WO 9856433 | Dec 1998 | WO |
WO 9929271 | Jun 1999 | WO |
WO 9932055 | Jul 1999 | WO |
WO 9938461 | Aug 1999 | WO |
WO 9938463 | Aug 1999 | WO |
WO 9938463 | Aug 1999 | WO |
WO 9938463 | Aug 1999 | WO |
WO 9956675 | Nov 1999 | WO |
WO 0007527 | Feb 2000 | WO |
WO 0007528 | Feb 2000 | WO |
WO 0030568 | Jun 2000 | WO |
WO 0040177 | Jul 2000 | WO |
WO 0041654 | Jul 2000 | WO |
WO 0041654 | Jul 2000 | WO |
WO 0059412 | Oct 2000 | WO |
WO 0066044 | Nov 2000 | WO |
WO 0066045 | Nov 2000 | WO |
WO 0066045 | Nov 2000 | WO |
WO 0074607 | Dec 2000 | WO |
WO 0156497 | Aug 2001 | WO |
WO 0156497 | Aug 2001 | WO |
WO 0193742 | Dec 2001 | WO |
WO 0193742 | Dec 2001 | WO |
WO 0195837 | Dec 2001 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20050177236 A1 | Aug 2005 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | PCT/CH02/00099 | Feb 2002 | US |
Child | 10923534 | US |