The invention relates to an intervertebral implant.
An intervertebral implant of this type made of an elongate metal plate and therefore opaque to X-rays is known from DE-A 196,15,938. The disadvantages of this known implant reside in its radiopacity which makes a post-surgical assessment of the fusion of the vertebral bodies impossible.
The invention relates to an intervertebral implant which permits a postsurgical observation by means of X-rays and which at the same time is characterised by a high degree of biocompatibility.
The invention further relates to a device in which the relatively low modulus of elasticity of the radiolucent material is apt to encourage an optimum bone growth.
Suitable radiolucent materials include for example polyetheretherketones (PEEK), ultra-high molecular weight polyethylenes (UHMWPE) or polysulfones (PSU), in particular those having a modulus of elasticity of between 3 and 5 GPa.
According to a preferred exemplary embodiment of the invention, the intervertebral implant is provided with at least one marker made of a radiopaque material which makes up at most 5 percent by volume of the intervertebral implant. This permits the position of the implant to be determined with an X-ray photograph, despite the growth of new bone. The markers preferably consist of titanium or tantalum and are shaped in the form of small pegs or balls.
According to a preferred exemplary embodiment of the invention, the cover face and the base face are each provided with a three-dimensionally structured surface, preferably in a regular arrangement, for example in the form of teeth arranged over a segment of a circle.
Preferably, the cover face and the base face are in a wedge-shaped arrangement relative to each other, forming an angle of, for example, between 10 and 20 degrees.
According to a preferred exemplary embodiment of the invention, the cover face and/or the base face may be provided with one or several guide notches which are oriented towards the hollow cylinder axis. The guide notches are preferably arranged at an angle of 45 degrees±15 degrees as seen from the hollow cylinder axis.
The ratio CF/FCA between the cover face CF and the free cross-sectional area FCA of the hollow cylinder defined by the internal lateral area should suitably be in a range of between 0.5 and 1.6.
According to another preferred exemplary embodiment of the invention, the hollow cylinder wall has a recess directed towards the hollow cylinder axis and extending from the cover face to the base face. On its higher side, the hollow cylinder wall preferably has a separating slot extending parallel to the hollow cylinder axis and reaching from the cover face to the base face, so as to give a U-shaped form to the implant. Preferably, the recess is arranged on the side of the hollow cylinder wall situated opposite to the separating slot as seen from the hollow cylinder axis.
The posterior recess allows the implant to be optimally seated on the end plate of the vertebral body. Thus, it is possible to achieve a high degree of primary stability. The register accuracy thus attained assists in preventing the implant from becoming laterally displaced.
The separating slot encourages the bone onlay on the end plates of the vertebral bodies to grow as rapidly as possible into the implant from the anterior side. In addition, the separating slot allows the implant to be filled in situ (e.g. with bone chips). Preferably, the separating slot has a width of between 6 and 10 mm.
According to a further preferred exemplary embodiment of the invention, the outer lateral area is provided with one or several retaining notches extending at a right angle to the hollow cylinder axis and located equidistant from the cover face and the base face. Preferably, several retaining notches are included which are offset by an amount of 90 degrees and/or 240 degrees as seen from the recess. It is particularly advantageous to provide two further retaining notches which are offset by 180 degrees and lead to the separating slot.
According to a further preferred exemplary embodiment of the invention, the hollow cylinder wall is provided with perforations which may be shaped, for example, in the form of circular bores, slots, or elongate holes. The perforations should be arranged at angles of 0 degrees, 90 degrees and/or 240 degrees, as seen from the recess.
For applications in the region of the lumbar column, the intervertebral implant preferably has a height of between 12 and 23 mm; for applications in the cervical spine, a height of between 4.5 and 12.5 mm is preferred.
With implants designed to be applied in the lumbar column, the outer lateral area preferably extends at a maximum distance of between 14 and 18 mm, measured from the hollow cylinder central axis.
With implants designed to be applied in the cervical spine, the outside lateral area preferably extends at a maximum distance of between 5.5 and 9.5 mm, measured from the hollow cylinder central axis.
In the following, the invention and exemplary embodiments of the invention will be illustrated in greater detail with reference to the partially diagrammatic representations of one embodiment.
The intervertebral implant shown in
The implant is formed at least 95 percent by volume of a radiolucent material such as PEEK (group of polyaryletherketones). Such a material must have a modulus of elasticity of between 1 and 20 GPa. Preferably, the modulus of elasticity is between 3 and 5 GPa.
The intervertebral implant further includes three markers (not shown in the drawings) made of a radiopaque material (tantalum or titanium) which together form at most 5 percent by volume of said intervertebral implant. The total volume (100 percent) is to be understood as the volume occupied by the material of the intervertebral implant, excluding the hollow space enclosed by the implant.
The cover face 1 and the base face 2 of the implant are provided with a three-dimensionally structured surface 10 which includes teeth regularly arranged over a segment of a circle. The arrangement of the teeth of the implant in the form of a segment of a circle—combined with the wedge-shaped form of the implant—confers a curvature to the cover face and the base face, which in turn allows the implant to be optimally seated on the end plate of the vertebral body.
As may be seen in
On the cover face 1 and the base face 2, the implant is provided with several lateral and antero-lateral guide notches 11 which are oriented towards the hollow cylinder axis 6. The guide notches serve for inserting the implant, by means of the blades of a distraction apparatus, into the intervertebral space thus spread apart. The offset arrangement of the notch pairs permits a lateral, an antero-lateral, and an anterior insertion of the implant.
The guide notches 11 are angularly offset by 45 degrees±15 degrees as seen from the hollow cylinder axis 6.
As may be seen in
The outer lateral area 4 is provided with two lateral retaining notches 8 extending at a right angle to the hollow cylinder axis 6, and thus in a plane perpendicular to axis 6, and located equidistant from the cover face 1 and the base face 2. The retaining notches 8 are angularly offset by an amount of 90 degrees and 240 degrees as seen from the recess 9.
Furthermore, two additional, anterior retaining notches 8 are included which are offset by an amount of 180 degrees and lead to the separating slot 7.
The function of the retaining notches, on the one hand, is to avoid an axial displacement of the implant holding device and, on the other hand, is to provide a plane contact surface for this instrument.
The hollow cylinder wall 3 is provided with at least one oval perforation 12 which is offset by an amount of 90 degrees as seen from the recess 9.
| Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PCT/EP99/06332 | 8/27/1999 | WO | 00 | 9/30/2002 |
| Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| WO01/15637 | 3/8/2001 | WO | A |
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 4904261 | Dove et al. | Feb 1990 | A |
| 4960818 | Reilly et al. | Oct 1990 | A |
| 5192327 | Brantigan | Mar 1993 | A |
| 5397364 | Kozak et al. | Mar 1995 | A |
| 5609636 | Kohrs et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
| 5645598 | Brosnahan, III | Jul 1997 | A |
| 5669909 | Zdeblick et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
| 5676146 | Scarborough | Oct 1997 | A |
| 5713899 | Marnay et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
| 5749916 | Richelsoph | May 1998 | A |
| D397439 | Koros et al. | Aug 1998 | S |
| 5865845 | Thalgott | Feb 1999 | A |
| 5888227 | Cottle | Mar 1999 | A |
| 5972368 | McKay | Oct 1999 | A |
| 6096080 | Nicholson et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
| 6143033 | Paul et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
| 6482233 | Aebi et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
| 6511509 | Ford et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
| Number | Date | Country |
|---|---|---|
| 196 15 938 | Oct 1996 | DE |
| 2 724 312 | Mar 1996 | FR |
| 2 733 413 | Oct 1996 | FR |