The present invention relates generally to packet-based telephony, and in particular to apparatuses and methods for the interworking of two or more non-compatible packet-based voice technologies.
Telephone carriers are deploying various packet-based voice technologies such as Real-time Transport Protocol/Internet Protocol (RTP/IP) and Asynchronous Transfer Mode Adaptation Layer 2 (ATM/AAL2). These technologies do not interwork seamlessly. Currently deployed call agents, software systems that establish the connections across packet-based voice network, do not have the capability to co-ordinate the conversion of different types of packet-based data. Two different types of packet-based voice technologies, for example VoIP and VoATM can be made to interwork with each other with a public switched telephone network (PSTN) between them. However, the PSTN middleman necessitates costly and inefficient conversion into outdated time division multiplexing (TDM) format and thence to another packet-based format. This lack of interworking is at the bearer and control levels. As a result, there are various, pioneering packet “islands” that use the outdated, PSTN as the glue, thereby annulling the advantages of packet-based voice technology over large geographical areas. Using the PSTN also incurs signal degradation because the PSTN uses only non-compressed voice signals. Packet networks may use compressed signals that need to be converted into non-compressed format and then converted back into compressed format.
The routing of packet-based voice data through a PSTN defeats one of the advantages of packet-based voice transmission, which is that the voice data can be compressed, thereby reducing bandwidth and cost. No such voice compression is possible in a PSTN; the telephonic data must be decompressed upon entering the PSTN and, recompressed upon exiting the PSTN. By routing VoIP data through a PSTN to an ATM network, this major advantage of packet-based voice technology is negated.
A method and apparatus is described for converting packet-based voice data of a first format directly to packet-based voice data of a second format. Data from two networks using non-compatible packet-based voice technologies, for example, VoATM and VoIP, is interworked for direct conversion. A connection is set between an edge gateway of a first voice packet network, having data in a first format, and an interworking unit (IWU). Another connection is set up between this IWU and an edge gateway of a second voice packet network, having data in the second format. The IWU is controlled by a single call agent that is able to co-ordinate the conversion, at the IWU, between the two packet formats. Because it has this capability, this call agent is also called the “conversion server”. This call agent may be identical to the call agent used to control one or both edge gateways that use different packet based technologies.
Other features and advantages of the present invention will be apparent from the accompanying drawings, and from the detailed description, which follows below.
The present invention is illustrated by way of example and not intended to be limited by the figures of the accompanying drawings in which like references indicate similar elements and in which:
An embodiment of the present invention will provide a simple method of interworking the call control and voice information of different voice packet networks (e.g., VoIP data with VoATM data). This is accomplished by taking advantage of the call-agent based complex call handling software to interwork the control information native to each of the packet networks. This software, called the “conversion server” software herein, provides a conversion between ATM parameters and IP parameters (e.g., AAL-2 profiles versus RTP/AVP payload types). The “conversion server” software also controls the IP-ATM conversion function that is modeled in terms of packet-to-packet endpoints within the Interworking Unit (IWU). If necessary, the interworking unit (IWU) accepts ATM switched virtual circuit signaling or AAL International Telecommunications Union Telecommunications (ITU) standard Q.2630.1 signaling to establish a bearer path in the ATM network and to bind into an RTP port on the other side of the Interworking Unit (IWU).
In one embodiment the ATM data is ATM Adaptation Layer Type 2 (AAL-2) data. In one embodiment the call agent that manages the VoATM network has the “conversion server” software and is used to interwork the VoATM and VoIP control information. This call agent, that has conversion capability, may be selected by the originating call agent based on destination number. In an alternative embodiment, the call agent that manages the VoIP network has the “conversion server” software and is used to interwork the VoATM and VoIP control information.
An intended advantage of one embodiment of the present invention is to provide user-transparent end-to-end code/profile negotiation that spans the IP and ATM networks. Another intended advantage is to provide the ability to access an adjacent packet network that uses a different technology (e.g., IP, ATM/PNNI, ATM/AAL2) with a minimal number of endpoints and links. Another intended advantage of one embodiment of the present invention is to provide the ability to interwork various packet-based voice technologies without recourse to legacy communication networks (e.g., PSTN).
The telecommunications system 200 shown in
The call agent information that contains the media gateway control protocol (MGCP) and session description protocol (SDP) is forwarded to the call agent message processor at operation 455. The call agent message processor interfaces to the VoIP call agent. In an alternative embodiment the call agent message processor interfaces to the VoATM call agent. The choice of the call agent is based on whether the “conversion server” software is located in the VoIP or VoATM call agents. As shown in
The call agent message processor interprets the SDP. The “conversion server” function in the call agent is responsible for deriving IP parameters from an ATM SDP, and the ATM parameters from an IP SDP. The “conversion server” function in the call agent is also responsible for identifying the packet relay endpoint to be used. The RTP port information in the SDP, the packet relay endpoint identifier and the virtual circuit identifier (VCI) or AAL2 channel identifier (CID) that it is mapped into is stored in the form of packet relay endpoint associations at operation 470. This information controls how the RTP streams flow into the VoATM streams and vice versa.
At operation 460, the bearer signaling information, extracted from the AAL-5 data at operation 450, is forwarded to the bearer signaling message processor. Based on the MGCP and the SDP messages, a bearer path, for example, a switched virtual circuit (SVC), or an AAL-2 path, is established. When the path is established a status indication is sent. The bearer signaling is described in more detail, below, in reference to
There is no separate conversion of VoATM to VoIP. The path established through the Interworking Unit (IWU) is a bi-directional path. Whenever there is VoATM to VoIP conversion, there is VoIP to VoATM conversion, and vice versa.
The following describes a VoATM-VoIP call set-up using an ATM core network as shown in
At this point the connection between the IWU and the IP edge gateway has been set, i.e., the IWU and the IP edge gateway know the IP addresses and RTP port numbers of each other.
At operation 535 the IWU sends the VoIP call agent an SDP descriptor, SDP6, which is forwarded to the ATM edge gateway. This includes the selected AAL2 profile for the connection that was derived in operation 520. At operation 540 the VoIP call agent sends SDP6 through to the VoATM edge gateway. This allows the VoATM edge gateway to know which profile to use. The ATM path to be used is conveyed through the BNC-ID in the signaling flows referred to in operation 520. At this point an end-to-end connection via the VoATM and VoIP networks has taken place.
In the foregoing specification, the invention has been described with reference to specific exemplary embodiments thereof. It will, however, be evident that various modifications and changes may be made thereto without departing from the broader spirit and scope of the invention as set forth in the appended claims. The specification and drawings are, accordingly, to be regarded in an illustrative sense rather than a restrictive sense.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5594732 | Bell et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
5659542 | Bell et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
5715250 | Watanabe | Feb 1998 | A |
6041054 | Westberg | Mar 2000 | A |
6111893 | Volftsun et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6385195 | Sicher et al. | May 2002 | B2 |
6519261 | Brueckheimer et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6563794 | Takashima et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6587460 | Bell et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6603774 | Knappe et al. | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6628617 | Karol et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6728261 | Sasson et al. | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6741585 | Munoz et al. | May 2004 | B1 |
6747986 | Charas et al. | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6754180 | Christie | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6775273 | Kung et al. | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6799210 | Gentry et al. | Sep 2004 | B1 |
6801542 | Subbiah | Oct 2004 | B1 |
6819678 | Sylvain | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6937598 | Hagirahim et al. | Aug 2005 | B1 |
6963569 | Briddell et al. | Nov 2005 | B1 |
7065093 | Kumar et al. | Jun 2006 | B1 |
7283533 | Kumar et al. | Oct 2007 | B1 |
7302054 | McNiff et al. | Nov 2007 | B1 |
20020054586 | Hoffmann | May 2002 | A1 |
20020176403 | Radian | Nov 2002 | A1 |