According to the Center for Disease Control (CDC), over sixty percent of the United States population is overweight, and almost twenty percent are obese. This translates into 38.8 million adults in the United States with a Body Mass Index (BMI) of 30 or above. The BMI is defined as a person's weight (in kilograms) divided by height (in meters), squared. To be considered clinically, morbidly obese, one must meet one of three criteria: BMI over 35, 100 lbs. overweight or 100% above ideal body weight. There is also a category for the super-obese for those weighing over 350 lbs.
Obesity is an overwhelming health problem. Because of the enormous strain associated with carrying this excess weight, organs are affected, as are the nervous and circulatory systems. In 2000, the National Institute of Diabetes, Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK) estimated that there were 280,000 deaths directly related to obesity. The NIDDK further estimated that the direct cost of healthcare in the US associated with obesity is $51 billion. In addition, Americans spend $33 billion per year on weight loss products. In spite of this economic cost and consumer commitment, the prevalence of obesity continues to rise at alarming rates. From 1991 to 2000, obesity in the US grew by 61%. Not exclusively a US problem, worldwide obesity ranges are also increasing dramatically.
One of the principle costs to the healthcare system stems from the co-morbidities associated with obesity. Type-2 diabetes has climbed to 7.3% of the population. Of those persons with Type-2 diabetes, almost half are clinically obese, and two thirds are approaching obese. Other co-morbidities include hypertension, coronary artery disease, hypercholesteremia, sleep apnea and pulmonary hypertension.
Although the physiology and psychology of obesity are complex, the medical consensus is that the cause is quite simple—an over intake of calories combined with a reduction in energy expenditures seen in modern society. While the treatment seems quite intuitive, the institution of a cure is a complex issue that has so far vexed the best efforts of medical science. Dieting is not an adequate long-term solution for most people. Once an individual has slipped past the BMI of 30, significant changes in lifestyle are the only solution.
There have been many attempts in the past to surgically modify patients' anatomies to attack the consumption problem by reducing the desire to eat. Stomach saplings, or gastroplasties, to reduce the volumetric size of the stomach, therein achieving faster satiety, were performed in the 1980's and early 1990's. Although able to achieve early weight loss, sustained reduction was not obtained. The reasons are not all known, but are believed related to several factors. One of which is that the stomach stretches over time increasing volume while psychological drivers motivate patients to find creative approaches to literally eat around the smaller pouch.
There are currently two surgical procedures that successfully produce long-term weight loss; the Roux-en-Y gastric bypass and the biliopancreatic diversion with duodenal switch (BPD). Both procedures reduce the size of the stomach plus shorten the effective-length of intestine available for nutrient absorption. Reduction of the stomach size reduces stomach capacity and the ability of the patient to take in food. Bypassing the duodenum makes it more difficult to digest fats, high sugar and carbohydrate rich foods. One objective of the surgery is to provide feedback to the patient by producing a dumping syndrome if they do eat these food products. Dumping occurs when carbohydrates directly enter the jejunum without being first conditioned in the duodenum. The result is that a large quantity of fluid is discharged into the food from the intestinal lining. The total effect makes the patient feel light-headed and results in severe diarrhea. For reasons that have not been determined the procedure also has an immediate therapeutic effect on diabetes.
Although the physiology seems simple, the exact mechanism of action in these procedures is not understood. Current theory is that negative feedback is provided from both regurgitation into the esophagus and dumping when large volumes of the wrong foods are eaten. Eventually, patients learn that to avoid both these issues they must be compliant with the dietary restrictions imposed by their modified anatomy. In the BPD procedure, large lengths of jejunum are bypassed resulting in malabsorption and therefore, reduced caloric uptake. In fact, the stomach is not reduced in size as much in the BPD procedure so that the patient is able to consume sufficient quantities of food to compensate for the reduced absorption. This procedure is reserved for the most morbidly obese as there are several serious side effects of prolonged malabsorption.
Unfortunately, these procedures carry a heavy toll. The morbidity rate for surgical procedures is alarmingly high with 11% requiring surgical intervention for correction. Early small bowel obstruction occurs at a rate of between 2-6% in these surgeries and mortality rates are reported to be approximately 0.5-1.5%. While surgery seems to be an effective answer, the current invasive procedures are not acceptable with these complication rates. Laparoscopic techniques applied to these surgeries provide fewer surgical complications but continue to expose these very ill patients to high operative risk in addition to requiring an enormous level of skill by the surgeon. Devices to reduce absorption in the small intestines have been proposed (See U.S. Pat. No. 5,820,584 (Crabb), U.S. Pat. No. 5,306,300 (Berry) and U.S. Pat. No. 4,315,509 (Smit)). However, these devices have not been successfully implemented.
The present invention provides a method and apparatus for the application of a barrier sleeve in the digestive tract to limit absorption of food products in specific parts of the digestive tract and to provide negative feedback to patients with morbid obesity enabling them to modify their heating habits. The sleeve may also be used for other treatments such as Type-2 diabetes.
A gastrointestinal implant device includes an unsupported flexible sleeve and an anchor coupled to a proximal portion of the sleeve. The flexible sleeve is open at both ends, and adapted to extend into the duodenum to limit absorption of nutrients in the duodenum. The anchor is adapted to be retained within the duodenum, particularly in the duodenal bulb just distal to the pylorus.
The anchor may be collapsible for ease of insertion and/or removal in a minimally. For example, the anchor may be inserted and/or removed endoluminally using a catheter-based procedure. The collapsible anchor is also well adapted for insertion into the duodenum, being capable of collapsing and/or flexing in response to natural movements of the local anatomy. The anchor can be covered by a proximal portion of the sleeve, and in some embodiments is sandwiched between a first inner layer and a second outer layer of the sleeve. The sleeve is of a length that chyme exiting the stomach funneled through the proximal end of the sleeve exits the sleeve through the distal end. The length of the sleeve can be varied. In some embodiments, the sleeve extends below the ligament of Treitz. In preferred embodiments, the sleeve material has a coefficient of friction of less than about 0.2. The sleeve may be formed of a biocompatible, low-friction material such as a fluoropolymer. In some embodiments, the sleeve is formed from PolyTetraFluoroEthylene (PTFE), expanded PTFE (ePTFE), or polyolefin (e.g., as a low density polyethylene film). Additionally, the sleeve may be coated or impregnated with a second material, such as polyurethane or silicone to reduce permeability. Still further, the distal end of the sleeve may be directionally textured.
The anchor can be attached to the surrounding anatomy using mechanical fasteners, such as sutures, surgical staples. In some embodiments, the mechanical fasteners can be dissolvable, dissolving after a predetermined time and allowing the device to pass naturally. In other embodiments, the anchor is attached to the surrounding anatomy using an interference fit provided by the relative size of the anchor in relation to the surrounding anatomy. Alternatively or in addition, the anchor can be attached to the surrounding anatomy using chemical fasteners, such as surgical adhesives.
Mechanical fasteners include barbs that extend from the exterior surface of the anchor for anchoring the proximal portion of the sleeve to the muscular tissue of the surrounding anatomy. The barbs may be bi-directional for anchoring the proximal portion of the flexible sleeve to the duodenum. Alternative anchors coupled to a proximal portion of the sleeve include a ring, a stent formed by a network of struts, or a wire formed as a wave.
An anti-buckling device may also be coupled to the sleeve and extend from below the anchor to the distal end of the flexible sleeve to reduce twisting and buckling of the sleeve. The sleeve allows enzymes secreted in the duodenum to pass through the duodenum outside the sleeve.
The gastrointestinal implant device can be inserted endoluminally in combination with a delivery catheter and can be similarly removed in combination with a removal device. More generally, the device can be implanted through a natural body lumen, such as per-orally and/or per-anally. Alternatively or in addition, the device can be implanted percutaneously. In one embodiment, the delivery apparatus includes a catheter for passage through the intestines and a spherically-shaped element coupled to the distal end of the catheter. In some embodiments, the spherically-shaped element can be remotely releasable.
In another aspect, a gastrointestinal implant device includes an unsupported flexible sleeve and a wave anchor coupled to a proximal portion of the sleeve. The wave anchor includes a compliant, radial spring shaped into an annular wave pattern about a central axis, providing an outward radial force, while allowing substantial flexure about its perimeter. Such flexure is advantageous as it allows for minimally-invasive delivery and ensures that the device will substantially conform to the surrounding anatomical structure when implanted. The annular wave element can be formed from one or more elongated resilient members and defines a lumen along its central axis formed between two open ends. When implanted, the central axis of the anchor is substantially aligned with the central axis of the duodenum, allowing chyme to pass through the device. Additionally, the compliant wave anchor minimizes trauma to the tissue by providing sufficient flexibility and compliance, while minimizing the likelihood of tissue erosion and providing a solid anchoring point to the tissue.
The anchor can be removably attached within the body using any of the methods described herein for securing an anchor, including the use of barbs attached to, and/or formed on the anchor itself. When implanted, the anchor enables a sleeve, or barrier to be securely implanted within the duodenum, preferably providing a fluid seal at the proximal end. To enhance a fluid seal, the proximal end of the sleeve can be contoured along a leading edge of the wave anchor. In this manner, substantially no unsupported sleeve remains proximal to the wave anchor. Thus, chyme is allowed to flow substantially unimpeded into the sleeve without becoming entrapped at the anchor.
The gastrointestinal implant device can be used in a method for treating intestinal bowel disease. An unsupported flexible sleeve is anchored within the duodenum. The sleeve is open at both ends and may be impregnated with a drug that reduces inflammation.
The gastrointestinal implant device can be used as a method for treating obesity. An unsupported flexible sleeve is anchored within the duodenum. The sleeve is open at both ends and enhanced with anti-hunger hormones.
The gastrointestinal implant device can be used as a method for treating Type-2 diabetes. A proximal portion of an unsupported flexible sleeve, open at both ends, is coupled to a collapsible anchor. The anchor includes barbs for insertion into tissue as the anchor expands to anchor the proximal portion of the sleeve in the duodenum. The flexible sleeve is extended at least into the duodenum to limit the digestion and/or absorption of nutrients.
The foregoing and other objects, features and advantages of the invention will be apparent from the following more particular description of preferred embodiments of the invention, as illustrated in the accompanying drawings in which like reference characters refer to the same parts throughout the different views. The drawings are not necessarily to scale, emphasis instead being placed upon illustrating the principles of the invention.
A description of preferred embodiments of the invention follows.
The duodenum 104 has four sections: superior, descending, transverse and ascending which typically form a U-shape. The superior section is about two inches long and ends at the neck of the gall bladder. The superior section also defines a feature referred to as the duodenal bulb 119 that begins just distal to the pylorus 108 and extends for about 1 to 1.5 inches in an adult human. The duodenal bulb 119 defines a lumen therein that is slightly larger than the distal duodenum 104. Advantageously, the duodenal bulb 119 exhibits less motion than the pylorus 108 and even distal portions of the duodenum 104. Notably, the motion is substantially limited to contractions without having a significant linear component (i.e., no movement along the central axis of the intestine). However, the tissue thins as one moves away from the pylorus 108.
The descending section of the duodenum 104 is about three to four inches long and includes a nipple shaped structure (papilla of Vater) 114 through which pancreatic juice from the pancreas and bile produced by the liver and stored by the gall bladder enter the duodenum from the pancreatic and bile ducts. The pancreatic juice contains enzymes essential to protein digestion and bile dissolves the products of fat digestion. The ascending section is about two inches long and forms the duodenal-jejunal flexure 116 where it joins the jejunum 106, the next section of the small intestine. The duodenal-jejunal flexure 116 is fixed to the ligament of Treitz 118 (musculus supensionus duodeni). The juices secreted in the duodenum break the partially digested food down into particles small enough to be absorbed by the body. The digestive system is described in Gray's Anatomy (“Anatomy of the Human Body,” by Henry Gray) and “Human Physiology,” Vander, 3rd ed, McGraw Hill, 1980, the contents of which are incorporated herein by reference in their entirety.
Within the implant device 200 at the proximal end including the first proximal opening 204 is a collapsible self-expanding anchor 208. The anchor 208 includes a plurality of opposed barbs 210 for anchoring the implant device 200 to the muscular tissue of the duodenum 104. The diameter of the anchor 208 is dependent on the diameter of the duodenum 104 (
Anchoring in the bulbous duodenum 119 offers several advantages over other areas in of gastrointestinal tract. First, the duodenal bulb 119 is proportionally sized to capture an anchor—that is it provides a cavity having a relatively large diameter bounded by anatomies having smaller diameters in both the proximal and distal directions. Thus, the duodenal bulb 119 is naturally configured to retain a suitably-shaped anchor.
Additionally, the duodenal bulb 119 is relatively less active than the either the pylorus or distal portions of the duodenum. The duodenal bulb 119 at least in part acts as a holding area for chyme received from the stomach. Thus, the duodenal bulb 119 provides a more stable anchoring platform as there is less movement there. Movement of the surrounding tissue can act to dislodge an anchor over time. Still further, as the tissue of at least the proximal portion of the duodenal bulb 119 is thicker than the tissue of the distal duodenum. Thus, the duodenal bulb 119 provides a better anchoring platform as it is adapted to regain longer fasteners (e.g., longer barbs).
The sleeve material is thin and conformable so that it collapses in the intestine to a small volume to minimize bowel irritability. It has a low coefficient of friction (less than about 0.20) so that chyme slides easily through it and the bowel slides easily around it. It is of low permeability to fluids so that the chyme does not touch the bowel wall and the digestive enzymes do not significantly breakdown the chyme. It is biologically inert and non-irritating to the tissues. One class of materials includes fluoropolymers. In some embodiments, the sleeve is formed from expanded PTFE with a wall thickness of about 0.006 inches and an internodal distance of 20 microns. This material is hydrophobic but is slightly porous. However, these very small pores may plug over time. The porosity may be reduced by coating the material on the inside, outside or in the pores with dilute solutions of silicone or polyurethane. Another material is polyethylene with a wall thickness of less than 0.001 inches. Other materials include Cast PolyTetraFluoroEthylene (PTFE, e.g., TEFLON), Cast PTFE with Fluorinated Ethylene Propylene (FEP) or PerFluoroAlkoxy (PFA) coating to minimize pin holes, Extruded FEP and Extruded PFA. These materials are solid and substantially non-porous in contrast to ePTFE which is porous, but these materials are also considered to be fluoropolymers. The wall thickness is preferably less than about 0.001 inches. Rubber-like materials typically have friction coefficients of about 1-4, significantly stickier than these materials. However, in alternate embodiments other materials having similar characteristics can be used.
In some embodiments, the sleeve is formed using a combination of two or more materials. For example, the sleeve can be formed using a combination of ePTFE and FEP. Such a combination can be formed by layering the two materials together and generally provides a low coefficient of friction while being substantially non-permeable.
The sleeve 202 includes two layers of material at least at the proximal end. A first outer layer covers the exterior of the anchor 208. The second inner layer covers the interior surface of the anchor 208. The barbs 210 protrude from the exterior surface of the anchor 208 through the first outer layer of the sleeve 202. The holes in the first outer layer through which the barbs 210 protrude can be filled with an impervious material such as silicone or urethane to limit mixing of digestive juices with the chyme flowing through the passageway. The diameter of the sleeve 202 is selected such that the first outer layer of the sleeve 202 fits over the anchor 208.
The sleeve length 212 is variable and can range from about one foot to about five feet. The typical length of the sleeve 202 is about 2 to 4 feet measured from the anchor (barbs 210) in the bulbous duodenum 119 to below the ligament of Treitz 118 (
The covered anchor 208 can be collapsed into a sheath having a diameter less than about 12 mm or less to enable endoluminal and/or catheter-based delivery. Covering the exterior surface of the anchor 208 with the first outer layer of the sleeve 202 permits catheter-based removal of the implant device 200 by preventing tissue in-growth on the exterior surface of the anchor 208.
Additionally, markings can be added to the exterior surface of the sleeve 202 to detect the position and orientation of the sleeve on a fluoroscopic image and whether the sleeve is twisted. For example, a radiopaque stripe can be painted down the length of the device 200 using tantulum impregnated ink, or tantulum bands can be bonded to a surface of the device, such as the interior surface. If the sleeve 202 is twisted, the sleeve 202 can be untwisted by inserting a balloon into the proximal end of the device thereby sealing it, and then injecting water into the sleeve 202 at low pressure. More generally, a radiopaque marking can also be used to facilitate placement and/or removal of the device.
The sleeve 202 can extend over the ligament of Treitz 118 beyond the proximal jejunum 106. Extending the sleeve 202 below the ligament of Treitz 118 reduces the likelihood that the sleeve 202 will move back through the duodenum 104 toward the stomach 102.
After the gastrointestinal implant device 200 has been placed in the body and anchored in the duodenum 104, chyme leaving the stomach passes through passageway 304 (
The sleeve 202 provides weight loss mechanisms by providing negative feedback, reduced fat digestion and reduced desire for food. The reduced fat digestion occurs because the sleeve 202 delays the mixing of bile and pancreatic juices with chyme from the stomach until after the chyme leaves the sleeve 202. The reduced desire for food may occur because the sleeve 202 blocks hormonal release from the duodenum 104. Additionally, providing poorly digested food to distal portions of the intestine, such as to the ileum, can trigger hormones that reduce appetite.
The sleeve 202 is non-compliant and drapes away from the intestinal walls thereby permitting the pancreatic juice to flow unimpeded into the duodenum 104 through the papilla of Vater 114. The normal peristalsis of the bowel is used to propel the chyme, bile, and pancreatic juices through the intestines.
In the embodiment shown, the anchor has a length L of about 1.5 inches and has a diameter D of about 1.5 inches. The struts 602 are flat, about 0.010 inches wide and about 0.004 to 0.010 inches thick. The anchor can be formed from a tube of material by laser cutting followed by expansion and heat setting, or other methods well known to those skilled in the art.
In an alternate embodiment, the struts 602 can be formed separately and the strut intersections can be welded or attached by other means well known to those skilled in the art. Visually the struts form sections 604 around the circumference of the anchor. Each section has a series of triangles with each triangle defined by one distal strut connection 606 and two proximal strut connections 608, 610. The ratio of the collapsed diameter to the expanded diameter of the anchor is roughly 1:4.
When expanded, the angle α between divergent strut sections is about 45-50 degrees and the diameter of the anchor is about 1.5 inches. When compressed, the angle between divergent strut sections is about 5-6 degrees to reduce the diameter of the anchor to about 0.5 inches for catheter-based delivery and removal. The elasticity of the struts permits this compression. When the radial compression is released, the elasticity of the struts causes the anchor to expand to diameter D. The anchor assumes its desired diameter as the elastic restoring forces seek their minimum stress.
In some embodiments, the ends of the struts at the proximal end of the anchor 600 can be elongated and shaped to provide barbs 612 to anchor to the muscular tissue of the duodenum 104.
The gastrointestinal implant device 200 is designed for catheter-based placement (e.g., endoluminal).
The catheter system 1200 includes an outer sheath 1202 for storing the anchor 208 in collapsed form, a flange 1216 to pull back the outer sheath 1202 and a sleeve retention wire mechanism 1224 for releasing a sleeve retention wire 1210 from the proximal end of the flexible sleeve 202 after the anchor has been released from the outer sheath 1202.
As described in conjunction with
The sleeve 202 is secured temporarily outside the inner sheath 1226 allowing for proper positioning of the gastrointestinal implant device and then for release. As shown, the sleeve 202 is secured by the sleeve retention wire 1210 using a dead-bolt mechanism 1206. Non-stick coatings such as Teflon on the sleeve retention wire 1210 are preferred to make release easier to accommodate tortuous anatomical pathways. The sleeve retention wire 1210 extends through the second inner lumen from the release mechanism 1224 of the catheter system 1200 to the dead-bolt mechanism 1206. The dead-bolt mechanism 1206 is described later in conjunction with
The sleeve retention wire 1210 holds the sleeve in position. The distal end of the folded sleeve is released by the release mechanism 1224 by pulling the sleeve retention wire 1210 backward from the proximal end 1208 of the catheter.
As described in conjunction with
Once in place, the sleeve retention wire 1210 can be removed. As described previously in conjunction with
In another embodiment, the anchor 208 can be configured with a drawstring. The drawstring can be selectively woven around the perimeter of the anchor 208 through openings of opportunity in the anchor 208. The openings can be defined by adjacent interconnected struts of the anchor 208. Alternatively, or in addition the drawstring can be selectively woven through dedicated openings, such as eyelets provided on the anchor 208. In some embodiments, the drawstring is woven through openings at the proximal end of the anchor 208. In operation, the drawstring can be pulled in a proximal direction by a retrieval device. The drawstring, when pulled, contracts about the perimeter of the anchor 208, thereby reducing the diameter of the anchor 208. Thus, the drawstring can be used to facilitate removal of an implanted anchor 208 by pulling it away from the surrounding anatomy thereby extracting any barbs from the surrounding muscular tissue.
The gastrointestinal implant device offers a new alternative where other means of weight loss and efforts at behavior modification have failed. Because the gastrointestinal implant device is introduced through a small diameter catheter (e.g., endoluminally), there is a reduced risk at insertion compared to surgery. The procedure is also completely reversible, making this approach the ideal solution for patients who are desperate to reverse behavioral patterns that have lead to weight gain.
When inserted in the body, the gastrointestinal implant device mimics the duodenal bypass of the Roux-en-Y procedure. The implanted device reduces caloric absorption by delaying enzyme mixing with food and provides the feedback produced by the Roux-en-Y procedure by producing dumping syndrome when high sugar meals are ingested. The implant device is an improvement on the Roux-en-Y procedure because it is minimally invasive and reversible. In the treatment of the super-obese where aggressive weight loss is not achieved, the length of the implant device below the anchor can be further increased to drive the patient close to the point of malabsorption.
Placement of the gastrointestinal implant device effectively provides that ingested food does not digest in a normal manner and the gut hormones that are normally triggered are modified. These hormones result in several physiology changes that impact hunger and digestion. Gut hormones include peptide YY (PYY), cholecystokinin (CCK) and ghrelin.
As under digested food enters the ileum or distal part of the small intestine 112, a hormone called peptide YY or PYY is released. This hormone has been shown to have a direct effect on appetite, reducing it when released. Undigested food in the ileum indicates that too much food has been ingested. Thus, dependent on the length of the sleeve, the gastrointestinal device can promote deposition of undigested or partially digested food to the distal bowel. Therefore, the placement of a sleeve in the intestine promotes the delivery of undigested food to the ileum, which in turn promotes the release of PYY and reduces appetite in humans.
The hormone cholecystokinin (CCK) is released when food contacts the duodenum 104. CCK triggers the release of bile from the gallbladder. Therefore, placing a sleeve in the duodenum 104 reduces the release of CCK and thus reduces bile output resulting in reduction in the digestion of food.
Some ghrelin is released when food contacts the duodenum 104. Ghrelin has been shown to be a factor in the control of appetite. This device will reduce ghrelin output and thereby reduce appetite due to the bypass of the duodenum 104.
Type-2 diabetes is a disease of obesity that occurs when patients cannot adequately use the insulin they produce. Usually, it is not that the patient cannot make enough insulin, but rather that the patient's body cannot effectively use the insulin produced. A particularly dangerous result of Type-2 diabetes is that blood sugar spikes after a meal. This is called post-prandial hyperglycemia. This spike in blood glucose causes cardiovascular and microvascular damage. One class of drugs used to control post-prandial hyperglycemia is the alpha-glucosidase inhibitors. These work by reducing the breakdown and absorption of carbohydrates to sugars. The sleeve has a similar function because it reduces bile and delays the breakdown and absorption of the carbohydrates, which are normally readily absorbed in the duodenum, but are less likely to be absorbed in the jejunum and ileum. Therefore, type 2 diabetes can be controlled by placing a sleeve in the proximal intestine to delay the digestion of carbohydrates which reduces post-prandial hyperglycemia.
The gastrointestinal implant device can be used to reduce Type-2 diabetes symptoms by bypassing the duodenum 104. Following gastric bypass surgery, patients commonly experience complete reversal of Type-2 diabetes. While the exact mechanism of this remarkable effect is not understood, the clinical result is reported in a high percentage of cases. Reversal of Type-2 diabetes after gastric bypass is described in “Potential of Surgery for Curing Type-2 Diabetes Mellitus” by Rubino et al. incorporated herein by reference in its entirety. Since the gastrointestinal implant device provides equivalent blockage of duodenal processes, a similar effect is elicited but without the trauma of surgery. In patients who are not obese but suffer Type-2 diabetes, a modified gastrointestinal implant device is inserted. This gastrointestinal implant device provides the necessary effect to hinder pancreatic processes and receptors without blocking absorption.
In the embodiment of the gastrointestinal implant device for treating diabetes, placement of the anchor within the stomach and/or duodenum allows the pylorus 108 to operate normally. The length of the sleeve may be reduced to mimic the duodenum bypass. The sleeve extends to just below the ligament of Treitz 118 but may not extend further into the jejunum 106, thus allowing absorption to occur in the jejunum 106.
The gastrointestinal implant device can be placed temporarily in the duodenum 104 to allow tissues to heal. For example, the sleeve can be placed temporarily to promote healing of ulcers in the duodenum 104. Ulcers are lesions that form in tissues of the duodenum 104. If they bleed, they are typically cauterized with electrosurgery. For ulcers to heal, they must be protected from the acidic environment. Placement of a sleeve for a short time period, for example, for one to two weeks, promotes healing of ulcers in the duodenum 104 by eliminating the acidic environment and allows the tissues to heal.
Intestinal anastomoses are performed to remove sections of diseased bowel. The stapled or sewn connection is prone to leakage until it heals. The placement of the gastrointestinal implant device temporarily in the bowel can be used to promote healing of small bowel anastomoses by protecting the area from chyme and minimizing leaks.
The gastrointestinal implant device can be used to deliver drugs, hormones and other active agents directly to the intestine. To deliver the agents, the sleeve and/or anchor is either coated or impregnated with the agents. The agents can include anti-inflammatory agents to reduce irritation due to placement of the anchor within the body. The agents can optionally or in addition include anti-hunger hormones.
The two most common intestinal bowel diseases are Crohn's disease and Ulcerative Colitus. Crohn's disease may occur in any part of the digestive tract. Although the exact cause of the disease is unknown, it appears to be an abnormal immune response in the patient, which leads to chronic inflammation of the intestinal lining.
Crohn's disease is treated with drugs intended to reduce inflammation. These include aminosalicylates, corticosteroids, immune modifiers such as azathioprine and methotrexate and antibiotics including ampicillin and cipro. These drugs have negative effects when given systemically. Since the drug is really only needed locally, smaller amounts of drug can be used if delivered directly to the tissues. Thus, an implanted sleeve treated with such a drug advantageously treats the surrounding tissues.
The intestinal sleeve can be coated with polymers that are impregnated with these drugs. Coatings may include polyurethanes, silicones and hydrophilic polymers such as those available from Hydromer of Somerville, N.J. These coatings may be applied to the sleeve material by dipping or spraying techniques. If a porous sleeve material such as ePTFE is used, the drug-filled polymer may be driven into the pores using pressure applied to the sleeve, such as internal pressure inside the sleeve. This increases the amount of drug that is available.
The sleeve material can also be a polymer that permits the incorporation of the drug directly into the wall. Such polymers include Ethylene Vinyl Acetate (EVA) and polyurethane. A greater amount of the drug may be incorporated in this case compared to a coating since there is more material in the wall than simply in coatings, thereby providing longer release times. The drug is compounded into the polymer and then extruded as is normally done to form the tubing or sheet from which the sleeve is made.
The sleeve is deployed transesophageally into the duodenum 104 and proximal jejunum 106. When the sleeve comes in contact with the tissues, the drugs in the coating are released directly into the tissues. Also, the sleeve may act to block the contact of the food to the mucosa, thereby reducing irritation caused by the chyme. Once the drug has fully eluted from the material, the sleeve is removed and a new one is placed.
The control of appetite in the human is a complex function of hormonal interactions. Several hormones have been implicated in its control including Ghrelin, Peptide YY, Leptin, Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 (GLP-1), Cholecystokinin (CCK), insulin and others. These hormones are either released or suppressed by the presence of food in the duodenum. For example, PYY acts as an anti-hunger hormone as injections of PYY have been shown to decrease food intake in both rats and humans and decreases in leptin have been shown to stimulate hunger.
Sleeves that are located in the duodenum 104 where many of these hormones are released may be impregnated with these hormones. When implanted, the hormones elute from the sleeve into the surrounding tissue where they activate the various satiety mechanisms.
The compliant wave anchor 2810 can be manufactured from a resilient metal such as a heat-treated spring steel, stainless steel, or from an alloy such as NiTi alloy commonly referred to as Nitinol. Other alloys include nickel-cobalt-chromium-molybdenum alloys possessing a unique combination of ultrahigh tensile strength, such as MP35N. Additionally, the wave anchor 2810 can be formed from a polymer and/or a composite having similar properties. The wave anchor 2810 can be manufactured from a single strand, such as a wire, contoured into the desired shape. Alternatively, the wave anchor 2810 can be manufactured from multi-strands of the same or different materials similarly contoured to the desired shape. In some embodiments, the wave anchor 2810 can be cut into the wave shape from tubular stock of the desired material, such as Nitinol.
The anchor 2810 can be removably attached within the body using any of the methods described herein for securing a anchor 208, including the use of barbs attached to, and/or formed on the anchor itself. When implanted, the anchor 2810 enables a sleeve 202, or barrier to be securely implanted within the duodenum 104, preferably providing a fluid seal at the proximal end. To enhance a fluid seal, the proximal end of the sleeve can be contoured to the wave anchor as shown in
In an embodiment according to the invention, the anchor has a relaxed diameter of at least about 40 millimeters. The anchor preferably has a minimal relaxed diameter of at least about 45 millimeters. The anchor, when implanted, preferably has a diameter of about 30 to 35 millimeters.
The catheter system 4250 includes an outer sheath 4222 for storing the collapsible anchor portion of the gastrointestinal implant device in collapsed form. Collapsible anchoring devices have already been described in conjunction with
A first lumen 4202 is used to pass a guide wire or mandrel 4226 through the catheter shaft to increase the rigidity of the catheter shaft during introduction of the catheter into the intestines. The first lumen 4202 is also used to inject fluid to lift the sleeve material 202 away from the inner shaft 4200 after the gastrointestinal device has been delivered to the intestine. A second lumen 4204 is used to pass a sleeve retention wire 4208 to the distal end of the gastrointestinal implant device. The sleeve retention wire is used to hold the distal end of the sleeve 202 to the outside of the inner shaft 4200. A third lumen 4206 is used to inject fluid at the tip of the catheter to lift the distal end of the sleeve 202 off the inner shaft 4200 prior to removal of the catheter system 4250 from the body.
Returning to
Proximal fitting 4220 is connected to the second lumen and proximal fitting 4212 is connected to the third lumen 4206. During delivery of the gastrointestinal implant device, the first lumen 4202 is filled with a 0.035 inch Teflon coated guide wire 4226 that provides column strength for the appropriate amount of pushability without compromising the flexibility of the catheter inner shaft 4200. A 0.015 inch diameter Teflon-coated steel wire is placed in the second lumen 4204 to serve as the distal sleeve retention wire. The second lumen 4204 has 2 skive holes 4214, 4216 near the distal end of the catheter shaft 4200. The distal sleeve retention wire 4208 exits the second lumen 4204 through a proximal skive hole 4214 feeds through the sleeve material 202, which is wrapped tightly around the distal outer diameter of the catheter shaft, and re-enters the second lumen 4204 through a distal skive hole 4216. This creates a dead bolt style lock holding the sleeve 202 to the shaft 4200 until ready to be released similar to the dead bolt style lock described in conjunction with the two lumen catheter shaft shown in
The distal end of the shaft terminates with a spherical shaped element 4218 that is either solid, or inflatable to form an atraumatic tip. In the embodiment shown, the spherical shaped element is a solid ball, similar to the ball described in conjunction with
The collapsed anchor assembly is located in outer sheath 4222. The ball 4218 at the end of the catheter is released to withdraw the catheter. The release mechanism pulls the sleeve retention wire to release the ball end and release the end of the sleeve. The anchor assembly is then released from the outer sheath as previously described.
The catheter can be used any time access to the intestinal tract is desired. For example, the catheter can be used to pass an endoscope into the intestine. This catheter device can be used to rapidly run the intestines, place a guide wire and then use the placed guide wire as a track for an endoscope.
The small bowel is accessed endoluminally by passing a semi-rigid tube into the stomach and into the pylorus 108 and proximal duodenum, inflating the bowel with a fluid, preferably water, and then passing a thin, flexible catheter with a large, atraumatic ball tip through the bowel.
A guide tube 4300 is placed over the end of a gastroscope 4302. The guide tube/gastroscope assembly is then placed through the patient's mouth, down the esophagus and into the stomach 102. The assembly is then passed into the pylorus 108 and the duodenum 104.
The guide tube 4300 has an inner diameter of approximately 0.63 inch (16 mm) and an outer diameter of approximately 0.70 inch (18 mm). It is approximately 30 inches (76.2 cm) in length and is made of a flexible polymer such as urethane with a flat wire wrap to provide kink resistance and pushability. The distal end of the guide tube 4300 can have a short, flexible end to minimize trauma to the pylorus 108.
Once in place, fluid is introduced through the channel of the gastroscope 4300 to inflate the intestine distally. Saline or water are preferred but air or carbon dioxide (CO2) can also be used. About 500-1000 cc of fluid is introduced for delivery of a 4 foot length of sleeve. Shorter sleeves require less fluid because the length of intestine to distend is less. Likewise, longer sleeves require more fluid. After the fluid is introduced, the gastroscope is removed from the guide tube.
If desired, the gastroscope 4203 can be removed from the guide tube 4300 and a balloon catheter can be introduced to deliver the fluid. The balloon catheter is delivered to the pylorus and inflated to roughly 0.394-0.591 inches (10-15 mm) to seal the intestine. A balloon catheter has already been described in conjunction with
The guide tube 4300 is then removed and the gastroscope re-introduced into the stomach and through the pylorus 108 to view the duodenum. The proximal anchor is then deployed by pulling back on the delivery tube 4222, which is connected to the proximal end of the catheter. After the anchor is deployed, the catheter system 4250 is withdrawn from the patient. The catheter 4302 has no edges that could catch on the sleeve 202 as it is pulled back through the pylorus 108 and the stomach 102 and the esophagus because the ball is left behind. This zero profile catheter design is important since it is typically very difficult to withdraw devices from the gastro-intestinal tract while leaving catheters or other devices behind.
A method for accessing the small bowel by passing a catheter through the mouth has been described in conjunction with
The ends of a wire, or thread 4600 are attached to the ball 4218 and the thread 4600 is looped through sleeve retention wire 4208 to hold the ball 4218 at the distal end of the inner shaft 4200 of the catheter. The ball 4218 is released by pulling back on sleeve retention wire 4208 with fitting 4200 (
The ball 4218 includes two holes 4800, 4802 extending from the recess 4706 to the exterior surface of the ball 4218. The distal end of the sleeve retention wire 4208 passes through hole 166 and is looped back into hole 167. As the sleeve retention wire 4208 is pulled proximally, the wire 4218 is pulled back through hole 4802 and then through hold 4800 and the ball 4218 is released from the distal end of the catheter.
A low profile balloon can be used instead of the ball 4218 at the distal end of the catheter.
Referring to
The further one tries to pass a device into the intestine, the more difficult it is since friction and tortuosity increase.
The delivery system is not limited to the delivery of a distal section of the sleeve for this embodiment of the gastrointestinal implant device. As described in conjunction with
The gastrointestinal implant device is delivered as previously described into the proximal intestines. Once deployed in the intestines, peristalsis from the natural activity of the intestine pulls the pill 5100 distally through the intestine. As the pill is pulled distally, the distal section of the sleeve 202 pulls out of the pill and deploys straight in the intestine. Peristalsis pulls the pill through the remainder of the intestines and the pill finally exits the body.
A one-foot length of sleeve material can be packed into a pill with length of 1 inch (25.4 mm) and diameter of 0.47 inch (12 mm). Therefore, if one only wishes to pass the catheter 2 feet into the intestine for delivery of the gastrointestinal device, the pill 5100 enables a 3 foot sleeve to be delivered with the additional 1 foot distal section of the 3-foot sleeve delivered in the pill 5100.
The delivery mechanism is shown for delivery of the gastrointestinal implant device described in conjunction with
A number of biodegradable materials may be used for the coatings on the pills including polyethylene glycols (PEG), polylactic acids (PLA) and polycaprolactones (PCL). These materials are made in formable resins or in liquids that can be converted to solids through various types of chemical and photochemical reactions. These materials break down into chemicals that are safe to internal tissues. These resins are made biodegradable by formulating a base molecule with a hydrolytically unstable link within the base chain.
For example, PEG is made biodegradable by incorporating lactic acid into the base chain. One end of the lactide molecule forms a link that will break down rapidly in the presence of water. One means of controlling the rate of degradation is by varying the number of lactide elements within the base chain. The greater the number, the faster the chain will break down. Additionally, the percent solids or density of the resulting solid is varied to alter degradation rates. Denser materials take longer to break down. Also, hydrolytically unstable bonds break down faster in elevated pH environments. Such an environment occurs naturally within the small intestines, on the outside of the sleeve where bile and bicarbonates are deposited.
An advantage of the wave design is the ability to form an anchor having a very flat compliance curve over a very long range of diameters. In general, referring now to
While this invention has been particularly shown and described with references to preferred embodiments thereof, it will be understood by those skilled in the art that various changes in form and details may be made therein without departing from the scope of the invention encompassed by the appended claims.
This application is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 13/170,785, filed Jun. 28, 2011, which is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 12/684,309, filed Jan. 8, 2010, issued as U.S. Pat. No. 7,981,163 on Jul. 19, 2011, which is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 11/493,487, filed Jul. 26, 2006, issued as U.S. Pat. No. 7,682,330 on Mar. 23, 2010, which is a divisional of U.S. application Ser. No. 10/858,851, filed Jun. 1, 2004, issued as U.S. Pat. No. 7,476,256 on Jan. 13, 2009, which claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/528,084, filed Dec. 9, 2003 and U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/544,527, filed Feb. 13, 2004. The entire teachings of the above applications are incorporated herein by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1899781 | Twiss | Feb 1933 | A |
2464933 | Kaslow | Mar 1949 | A |
3516408 | Montani | Jun 1970 | A |
3780740 | Rhea | Dec 1973 | A |
4133315 | Berman et al. | Jan 1979 | A |
4134405 | Smit | Jan 1979 | A |
4246893 | Berson | Jan 1981 | A |
4265694 | Boretos et al. | May 1981 | A |
4270542 | Plumley | Jun 1981 | A |
4271827 | Angelchik | Jun 1981 | A |
4279251 | Rüsch | Jul 1981 | A |
4315509 | Smit | Feb 1982 | A |
4341218 | Ü | Jul 1982 | A |
4403604 | Wilkinson et al. | Sep 1983 | A |
4416267 | Garren et al. | Nov 1983 | A |
4501264 | Rockey | Feb 1985 | A |
4580568 | Gianturco | Apr 1986 | A |
4607618 | Angelchik | Aug 1986 | A |
4617932 | Kornberg | Oct 1986 | A |
4641653 | Rockey | Feb 1987 | A |
4648383 | Angelchik | Mar 1987 | A |
4763653 | Rockey | Aug 1988 | A |
4768507 | Fischell et al. | Sep 1988 | A |
4787899 | Lazarus | Nov 1988 | A |
4823808 | Clegg et al. | Apr 1989 | A |
4846836 | Reich | Jul 1989 | A |
4878905 | Blass | Nov 1989 | A |
4899747 | Garren et al. | Feb 1990 | A |
4905693 | Ravo | Mar 1990 | A |
4913141 | Hillstead | Apr 1990 | A |
4991594 | Angelchik | Feb 1991 | A |
5035706 | Gianturco et al. | Jul 1991 | A |
5037387 | Quinn et al. | Aug 1991 | A |
5041126 | Gianturco | Aug 1991 | A |
5057091 | Andersen | Oct 1991 | A |
5059166 | Fischell et al. | Oct 1991 | A |
5104399 | Lazarus | Apr 1992 | A |
5123917 | Lee | Jun 1992 | A |
5135516 | Sahatjian et al. | Aug 1992 | A |
5139478 | Koninckx et al. | Aug 1992 | A |
5152756 | Quinn et al. | Oct 1992 | A |
5152782 | Kowligi et al. | Oct 1992 | A |
5176617 | Fischell et al. | Jan 1993 | A |
5190561 | Graber | Mar 1993 | A |
5207695 | Trout, III | May 1993 | A |
5226429 | Kuzmak | Jul 1993 | A |
5234454 | Bangs | Aug 1993 | A |
5236423 | Mix et al. | Aug 1993 | A |
5246456 | Wilkinson | Sep 1993 | A |
5254133 | Seid | Oct 1993 | A |
5279553 | Winkler et al. | Jan 1994 | A |
5282824 | Gianturco | Feb 1994 | A |
5290294 | Cox et al. | Mar 1994 | A |
5306300 | Berry | Apr 1994 | A |
5314444 | Gianturco | May 1994 | A |
5314472 | Fontaine | May 1994 | A |
5314473 | Godin | May 1994 | A |
5318530 | Nelson, Jr. | Jun 1994 | A |
5322501 | Mahmud-Durrani | Jun 1994 | A |
5330500 | Song | Jul 1994 | A |
5364353 | Corfitsen et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
5387235 | Chuter | Feb 1995 | A |
5389090 | Fischell et al. | Feb 1995 | A |
5401241 | Delany | Mar 1995 | A |
5405378 | Strecker | Apr 1995 | A |
5417697 | Wilk et al. | May 1995 | A |
5443498 | Fontaine | Aug 1995 | A |
5456713 | Chuter | Oct 1995 | A |
5458605 | Klemm | Oct 1995 | A |
5458615 | Klemm | Oct 1995 | A |
5476506 | Lunn | Dec 1995 | A |
5480423 | Ravenscroft et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
5492530 | Fischell et al. | Feb 1996 | A |
5507767 | Maeda et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
5507771 | Gianturco | Apr 1996 | A |
5522880 | Barone et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
5562697 | Christiansen | Oct 1996 | A |
5562728 | Lazarus et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5569219 | Hakki et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5571173 | Parodi | Nov 1996 | A |
5605530 | Fischell et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
5607442 | Fischell et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
5611787 | Demeter et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
5620763 | House et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5624430 | Eton et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5630797 | Diedrich et al. | May 1997 | A |
5634928 | Fischell et al. | Jun 1997 | A |
5639274 | Fischell et al. | Jun 1997 | A |
5643312 | Fischell et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5662585 | Willis et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5662713 | Andersen et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5665064 | Bodicky et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5669932 | Fischell et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5683451 | Lenker et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
5690642 | Osborne et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
5693084 | Chuter | Dec 1997 | A |
5695516 | Fischell et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5697971 | Fischell et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5713948 | Uflacker | Feb 1998 | A |
5715832 | Koblish et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
5718973 | Lewis et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
5720776 | Chuter et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
5722984 | Fischell et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5730698 | Fischell et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5733325 | Robinson et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5735859 | Fischell et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5735892 | Myers et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5741292 | Mendius | Apr 1998 | A |
5743874 | Fischell et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5746692 | Bacich et al. | May 1998 | A |
5749825 | Fischell et al. | May 1998 | A |
5749848 | Jang et al. | May 1998 | A |
5755777 | Chuter | May 1998 | A |
5759174 | Fischell et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5769887 | Brown et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5772668 | Summers et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5776186 | Uflacker | Jul 1998 | A |
5792144 | Fischell et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5792172 | Fischell et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5800381 | Ognier | Sep 1998 | A |
5800456 | Maeda et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5800526 | Anderson et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5820584 | Crabb | Oct 1998 | A |
5824041 | Lenker et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5824058 | Ravenscroft et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5824071 | Nelson et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5830229 | Konya et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5833707 | McIntyre et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5840009 | Fischell et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5843164 | Frantzen et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5855601 | Bessler et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
5876445 | Andersen et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5879282 | Fischell et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5879370 | Fischell et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5895391 | Farnholtz | Apr 1999 | A |
5910145 | Fischell et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5913895 | Burpee et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5919225 | Lau et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5919233 | Knopf et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5925063 | Khosravi | Jul 1999 | A |
5925076 | Inoue | Jul 1999 | A |
5935161 | Robinson et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5962620 | Reich et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5963620 | Frankel et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5964771 | Beyar et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5976153 | Fischell et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5984964 | Roberts et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5989280 | Euteneuer et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6013019 | Fischell et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6013085 | Howard | Jan 2000 | A |
6025044 | Campbell et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6027508 | Ren et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6027526 | Limon et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6035856 | LaFontaine et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6074673 | Guillen | Jun 2000 | A |
6077297 | Robinson et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6086604 | Fischell et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6099552 | Adams | Aug 2000 | A |
6102887 | Altman | Aug 2000 | A |
6113607 | Lau et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6120533 | Fischell | Sep 2000 | A |
6120534 | Ruiz | Sep 2000 | A |
6121341 | Sawhney et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6132471 | Johlin, Jr. | Oct 2000 | A |
6139572 | Campbell et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6146323 | Fischell | Nov 2000 | A |
6152956 | Pierce | Nov 2000 | A |
6179868 | Burpee et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6187016 | Hedges et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6190403 | Fischell et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6200336 | Pavcnik et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6221043 | Fischell et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6221102 | Baker et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6241738 | Dereume | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6241757 | An et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6245097 | Inoue | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6251064 | Silverman et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6251132 | Ravenscroft et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6254629 | Inoue | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6270521 | Fischell et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6273917 | Inoue | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6287335 | Drasler et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6293960 | Ken | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6302891 | Nadal | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6302917 | Dua et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6315708 | Salmon et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6322538 | Elbert et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6331190 | Shokoohi et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6332877 | Michels | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6355056 | Pinheiro | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6356782 | Sirimanne et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6358275 | Mcllroy et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6375660 | Fischell et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6383214 | Banas et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6387114 | Adams | May 2002 | B2 |
6387977 | Sawhney et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6401718 | Johnson et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6402779 | Colone et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6406792 | Briquet et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6428558 | Jones et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6450989 | Dubrul et al. | Sep 2002 | B2 |
6458074 | Matsui et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6468298 | Pelton | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6485409 | Voloshin et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6485515 | Strecker | Nov 2002 | B2 |
6508833 | Pavcnik et al. | Jan 2003 | B2 |
6514282 | Inoue | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6520985 | Burpee et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6520986 | Martin et al. | Feb 2003 | B2 |
6524268 | Hayner et al. | Feb 2003 | B2 |
6524335 | Hartley et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6524336 | Papazolgou et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6530951 | Bates et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6537247 | Shannon | Mar 2003 | B2 |
6540775 | Fischell et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6540789 | Silverman et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6544291 | Taylor | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6547817 | Fischell et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6558400 | Deem et al. | May 2003 | B2 |
6558429 | Taylor | May 2003 | B2 |
6565597 | Fearnot et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6569181 | Burns | May 2003 | B1 |
6572646 | Boylan et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6582460 | Cryer | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6585756 | Strecker | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6589213 | Reydel | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6589275 | Ivancev et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6613072 | Lau et al. | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6623518 | Thompson et al. | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6635069 | Teoh et al. | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6635079 | Unsworth et al. | Oct 2003 | B2 |
6645239 | Park et al. | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6652555 | VanTassel et al. | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6656194 | Gannoe et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6656212 | Ravenscroft et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6669722 | Chen et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6673339 | Atala et al. | Jan 2004 | B1 |
6675809 | Stack et al. | Jan 2004 | B2 |
6676692 | Rabkin et al. | Jan 2004 | B2 |
6695875 | Stelter et al. | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6699263 | Cope | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6699278 | Fischell et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6706061 | Fischell et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6716240 | Fischell et al. | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6736840 | Fischell et al. | May 2004 | B2 |
6740121 | Geitz | May 2004 | B2 |
6755869 | Geitz | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6761733 | Chobotov et al. | Jul 2004 | B2 |
6764518 | Godin | Jul 2004 | B2 |
6773440 | Gannoe et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6776791 | Stallings et al. | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6802868 | Silverman et al. | Oct 2004 | B2 |
6821291 | Bolea et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6845776 | Stack et al. | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6849087 | Chuter | Feb 2005 | B1 |
6855159 | Tanner et al. | Feb 2005 | B1 |
6860899 | Rivelli, Jr. | Mar 2005 | B1 |
6860901 | Baker et al. | Mar 2005 | B1 |
6918871 | Schulze | Jul 2005 | B2 |
6926658 | Farnan | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6936065 | Khan et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6960233 | Berg et al. | Nov 2005 | B1 |
6989024 | Hebert et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
7011654 | Dubrul et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7011671 | Welch | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7011673 | Fischell et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7025791 | Levine et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7033384 | Gannoe et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7037327 | Salmon et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7037344 | Kagan et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7054690 | Imran | May 2006 | B2 |
7066951 | Chobotov | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7081132 | Cook et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7087088 | Berg et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7111627 | Stack et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7121283 | Stack et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7122058 | Levine et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7146984 | Stack et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7147865 | Fishman et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7152607 | Stack et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7160312 | Saadat | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7175660 | Cartledge et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7211114 | Bessler et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
7220237 | Gannoe et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
7220284 | Kagan et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
7229428 | Gannoe et al. | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7267694 | Levine et al. | Sep 2007 | B2 |
7314489 | McKenna et al. | Jan 2008 | B2 |
7316716 | Egan | Jan 2008 | B2 |
7329285 | Levine et al. | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7335224 | Øhlenschlæger | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7338518 | Chobotov | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7338520 | Bailey et al. | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7347875 | Levine et al. | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7354454 | Stack et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7476256 | Meade et al. | Jan 2009 | B2 |
7488344 | Hartley et al. | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7507218 | Aliski et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7513914 | Schurr | Apr 2009 | B2 |
7608114 | Levine et al. | Oct 2009 | B2 |
7611528 | Goodson, IV et al. | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7621886 | Burnett | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7678068 | Levine et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7682330 | Meade et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7695446 | Levine et al. | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7758535 | Levine et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7766861 | Levine et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7766973 | Levine et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7785361 | Nikolchev et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7794487 | Majercak et al. | Sep 2010 | B2 |
7803177 | Hartley et al. | Sep 2010 | B2 |
7815589 | Meade et al. | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7815671 | Wright et al. | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7819836 | Levine et al. | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7837643 | Levine et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7862609 | Butaric et al. | Jan 2011 | B2 |
7881797 | Griffin et al. | Feb 2011 | B2 |
7892214 | Kagan et al. | Feb 2011 | B2 |
7935073 | Levine et al. | May 2011 | B2 |
7981163 | Meade et al. | Jul 2011 | B2 |
8092510 | Metcalf et al. | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8096966 | Levine et al. | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8109895 | Williams et al. | Feb 2012 | B2 |
8137301 | Levine et al. | Mar 2012 | B2 |
8142490 | Rice et al. | Mar 2012 | B2 |
8162871 | Levine et al. | Apr 2012 | B2 |
8303669 | Meade et al. | Nov 2012 | B2 |
8317859 | Snow et al. | Nov 2012 | B2 |
8333797 | Goodson, IV et al. | Dec 2012 | B2 |
8486137 | Suri et al. | Jul 2013 | B2 |
8486153 | Levine et al. | Jul 2013 | B2 |
8568472 | Marchand et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8579954 | Licata | Nov 2013 | B2 |
8579961 | Casey, II et al. | Nov 2013 | B2 |
8628583 | Meade et al. | Jan 2014 | B2 |
8834405 | Meade et al. | Sep 2014 | B2 |
8870806 | Levine et al. | Oct 2014 | B2 |
9084669 | Meade et al. | Jul 2015 | B2 |
20010020190 | Taylor | Sep 2001 | A1 |
20020022853 | Swanson et al. | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020032487 | Dua et al. | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020065545 | Leonhardt et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20020091439 | Baker et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020099439 | Schwartz et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020107565 | Greenhalgh | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020120277 | Hauschild et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020143387 | Soetikno et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020147489 | Hong et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020151953 | Chobotov et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020155100 | Kieffer et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020177890 | Lenker | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020183768 | Deem et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20020183786 | Girton | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20020188344 | Bolea et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20020193828 | Griffin et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030009236 | Godin | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030032941 | Boyle et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030040804 | Stack et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030040808 | Stack et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030050684 | Abrams et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030055492 | Shaolian et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030069539 | Gandhi et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030074051 | Freislinger Luehrs | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030109892 | Deem et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030109931 | Geitz | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030109935 | Geitz | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030120265 | Deem et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030149467 | Linder et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030153927 | DiPoto et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030154986 | Fariss et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030191476 | Smit | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030199989 | Stack et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030199990 | Stack et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030199991 | Stack et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030208260 | Lau et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20030216749 | Ishikawa et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20030225445 | Derus et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20030233140 | Hartley et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040019388 | Starkebaum | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040024386 | Deem et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040037865 | Miller | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040039452 | Bessler | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040044357 | Gannoe et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040082963 | Gannoe et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040092892 | Kagan et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040092974 | Gannoe et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040093063 | Wright et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040093065 | Yachia et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040098079 | Hartley et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040107004 | Levine et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040117004 | Osborne et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040117031 | Stack et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040122452 | Deem et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040122453 | Deem et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040122470 | Deem et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040133147 | Woo | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040136971 | Scharp et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040138525 | Saadat et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040138529 | Wiltshire et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040138760 | Schurr | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040138761 | Stack et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040143342 | Stack et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040148034 | Kagan et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040151740 | Aoki et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040153167 | Stack et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040158229 | Quinn | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040158331 | Stack et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040172063 | Li et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040172088 | Knudson et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040172141 | Stack et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040172142 | Stack et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040172143 | Geitz | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040181242 | Stack et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040193093 | Desmond, III | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040193261 | Berreklouw | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040210243 | Gannoe et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040220682 | Levine et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040236363 | Kieturakis et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040236401 | Shin et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040249362 | Levine et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050004681 | Stack et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050033331 | Burnett et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050043601 | Kilcoyne et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050043817 | McKenna et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050049718 | Dann et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050055039 | Burnett et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050060017 | Fischell et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050075622 | Levine et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050080395 | Levine et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050080431 | Levine et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050080480 | Bolea et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050080491 | Levine et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050085787 | Laufer | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050085923 | Levine et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050090873 | Imran | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050096725 | Pomeranz et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050096750 | Kagan et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050107862 | Ohlenschlaeger | May 2005 | A1 |
20050111072 | Miyakgaki et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050125020 | Meade et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050125075 | Meade et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050149114 | Cartledge et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050171556 | Murphy | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050182481 | Schlick et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050182483 | Osborne et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050192614 | Binmoeller | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050216040 | Gertner et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050216042 | Gertner | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050221072 | Dubrow et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050228415 | Gertner | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050228504 | Demarais | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050240279 | Kagan et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050256587 | Egan | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050267405 | Shah | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050267499 | Stack et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050267533 | Gertner | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050273060 | Levy et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050283107 | Kalanovic et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060009858 | Levine et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060064120 | Levine et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060106332 | Knudson et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060142836 | Hartley et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060155312 | Levine et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060161139 | Levine et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060161172 | Levine et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060161187 | Levine et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060161265 | Levine et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060212042 | Lamport et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060265082 | Meade et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060271166 | Thill et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060271175 | Woolfson et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060287734 | Stack et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070005147 | Levine et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070010794 | Dann et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070010864 | Dann et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070026042 | Narayanan | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070027548 | Levine et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070032879 | Levine et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070049801 | Lamport et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070083258 | Falotico et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070083271 | Levine et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070173787 | Huang et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070276432 | Stack et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070282453 | Weitzner et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20070282454 | Krueger et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20070293885 | Binmoeller | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080058772 | Robertson et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080065136 | Young | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080071383 | Levine et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080097466 | Levine et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080103604 | Levine et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080208239 | Annunziata | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080208240 | Paz | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080208357 | Melanson et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080221556 | Johnson et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080221575 | Betts | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080223476 | Stinson | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080234834 | Meade et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080293885 | Morimoto et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20090012553 | Swain et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090024077 | Zeiner et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090062717 | Laufer | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090240340 | Levine et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090248171 | Levine et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090281563 | Newell et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20100114130 | Meade et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100256775 | Belhe et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100256776 | Levine et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100331756 | Meade et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110245752 | Levine et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110257580 | Meade et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110276091 | Melanson et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20120179086 | Shank et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120184967 | Levine et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120209370 | Thill et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120215152 | Levine et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20130012862 | Meade et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20140100512 | Meade | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140194805 | Levine et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20150238305 | Meade et al. | Aug 2015 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
33 26 061 | Feb 1984 | DE |
0 480 667 | Apr 1992 | EP |
0278937 | Oct 1993 | EP |
0 423 916 | Apr 1994 | EP |
0 686 379 | Dec 1995 | EP |
0 506 918 | Jan 1996 | EP |
0754017 | Jan 1997 | EP |
0843538 | May 1998 | EP |
0 857 471 | Aug 1998 | EP |
0935977 | Aug 1999 | EP |
0935977 | Aug 1999 | EP |
1 481 649 | Dec 2004 | EP |
1 504 778 | Feb 2005 | EP |
1 504 778 | Mar 2005 | EP |
1 772 115 | Apr 2007 | EP |
04212348 | Aug 1992 | JP |
05-305092 | Nov 1993 | JP |
08-052165 | Feb 1996 | JP |
2000-126304 | May 2000 | JP |
2002-503114 | Jan 2002 | JP |
2002-531169 | Sep 2002 | JP |
WO 9206734 | Apr 1992 | WO |
WO 9505132 | Feb 1995 | WO |
WO 9618361 | Jun 1996 | WO |
WO 9703624 | Feb 1997 | WO |
WO 9808456 | Mar 1998 | WO |
WO 9822045 | May 1998 | WO |
WO 9923953 | May 1999 | WO |
WO 9944536 | Sep 1999 | WO |
WO 0012027 | Mar 2000 | WO |
WO 0028922 | May 2000 | WO |
WO 0032137 | Jun 2000 | WO |
WO 0042945 | Jul 2000 | WO |
WO 0042949 | Jul 2000 | WO |
WO 0059405 | Oct 2000 | WO |
WO 0112256 | Feb 2001 | WO |
WO 0135861 | May 2001 | WO |
WO 0145485 | Jun 2001 | WO |
WO 02081019 | Oct 2002 | WO |
WO 02096327 | Dec 2002 | WO |
WO 03017882 | Mar 2003 | WO |
WO 03086246 | Oct 2003 | WO |
WO 03086247 | Oct 2003 | WO |
WO 03086360 | Oct 2003 | WO |
WO 03094785 | Nov 2003 | WO |
WO 04000169 | Dec 2003 | WO |
WO 2004004542 | Jan 2004 | WO |
WO 2004004542 | Jan 2004 | WO |
WO 2004014237 | Feb 2004 | WO |
WO 2004019765 | Mar 2004 | WO |
WO 2004019765 | Mar 2004 | WO |
WO 2004021894 | Mar 2004 | WO |
WO 2004037064 | May 2004 | WO |
WO 2004037064 | May 2004 | WO |
WO 2004049982 | Jun 2004 | WO |
WO 2004064680 | Aug 2004 | WO |
WO 2004064682 | Aug 2004 | WO |
WO 2004064685 | Aug 2004 | WO |
WO 2004069331 | Aug 2004 | WO |
WO 2004069332 | Aug 2004 | WO |
WO 2004073782 | Sep 2004 | WO |
WO 2004080336 | Sep 2004 | WO |
WO 2004087014 | Oct 2004 | WO |
WO 2004087233 | Oct 2004 | WO |
WO 2004093639 | Nov 2004 | WO |
WO 2004093639 | Nov 2004 | WO |
WO 2005011533 | Feb 2005 | WO |
WO 2005060869 | Jul 2005 | WO |
WO 2005060882 | Jul 2005 | WO |
WO 2005082296 | Sep 2005 | WO |
WO 2005110280 | Nov 2005 | WO |
WO 2005117716 | Dec 2005 | WO |
WO 2005118049 | Dec 2005 | WO |
WO 2005120363 | Dec 2005 | WO |
WO 2006016894 | Feb 2006 | WO |
WO 2006034062 | Mar 2006 | WO |
WO 2006078781 | Jul 2006 | WO |
WO 2006078927 | Jul 2006 | WO |
WO 2006088578 | Aug 2006 | WO |
WO 2006102012 | Sep 2006 | WO |
WO 2006133311 | Dec 2006 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Notice of Allowance, U.S. Appl. No. 13/098,750, dated Jun. 23, 2014 “Intestinal Sleeve”. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 14/102,065, entitled “Methods and Apparatus for Anchoring Within the Gastrointestinal Tract”, mailed Nov. 18, 2014. |
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/880,631, dated Apr. 24, 2012 “Methods and Apparatus for Anchoring Within the Gastrointestinal Tract.” |
Non-Final Office Action, dated Dec. 16, 2013 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/098,750 “Methods of Treatment Using a Bariatric Sleeve.” |
Non-Final Office Action, dated Jan. 8, 2014 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/401,258 “Bariatric Sleeve.” |
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 12/454,878, Date Mailed: Nov. 14, 2011 “Bariatric Sleeve.” |
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 12/454,915, Date Mailed: Nov. 22, 2011 “Bariatric Sleeve.” |
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 12/880,631, dated Jul. 3, 2012 “Methods and Apparatus for Anchoring Within the Gastrointestinal Tract.” |
Notice of Allowance of U.S. Appl. No. 11/302,946 dated Dec. 29, 2009 “Methods of Treatment Using a Bariatric Sleeve.” |
Office Action dated Jun. 7, 2013 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/618,036 “Methods and Apparatus for Anchoring Within the Gastrointestinal Tract.” |
Office Action dated May 6, 2011; U.S. Appl. No. 12/454,878 “Bariatric Sleeve.” |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/618,036, dated Mar. 4, 2013 “Methods and Apparatus for Anchoring Within the Gastrointestinal Tract.” |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/978,327, Mail Date: Sep. 29, 2010 “Methods of Treatment Using a Bariatric Sleeve”. |
Office Action of U.S. Appl. No. 11/978,327 dated Nov. 20, 2009 “Methods of Treatment Using a Bariatric Sleeve.” |
Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 12/880,631, dated Dec. 1, 2011 “Methods and Apparatus for Anchoring Within the Gastrointestinal Tract.” |
Office Action dated May 6, 2011; U.S. Appl. No. 12/454,915 “Bariatric Sleeve.” |
Bethge, N., et al., “Human tissue responses to metal stents implanted in vivo for the palliation of malignant stenoses,” Gastrointestinal Endoscopy 43(6):596-602 (1996). |
Binkert, C. A., et al., “Benign and Malignant Stenoses of the Stomach and Duodenum: Treatment with Self-expanding Metallic Endoprostheses,” Radiology 199(2):335-338 (1996). |
CHOOSTENT™, Covered Esophageal Stent, Instructions, Retrieved from the Internet (http://mitech.co.kr/uploads/images/282/use guide esophachoo—english.pdf) on Jul. 26, 2005. |
Cwikiel, W., et al., “Self-expanding Stent in the Treatment of Benign Esophageal Strictures: Experimental Study in Pigs and Presentation of Clinical Cases,” Radiology 187(3):667-671 (1993). |
Dolan, K. et al., “Treating Diabetes in the Morbidly Obese by Laproscopic Gastric Band,” Obesity Surgery, vol. 13, pp. 439-443 (2003). |
Dormann, A.J. et al., “Self-expanding metallic stents for continous dilatation of benign stenosis in gastrointestinal tract—first results of long-term follow-up in interim stent application in pyloric and colonic obstructions,” Z Gastroenteral 39:957-960 (2001). |
Feretis, C., et al., “Palliation of Malignant Gastric Outlet Obstruction with Self-Expanding Metal Stents,” Endoscopy 28:225-228 (1996). |
Hwang, J.C., et al., “Covered Retrievable Tracheobronchial Hinged Stent: An Experimental Study in Dogs,” J. Vasc. Interv. Radiol., 12(12):1429-1436 (Dec. 2001). |
Irie, T., et al., “Relocatable Gianturco Expandable Metallic Stents1,” Radiology, 178:575-578 (1991). |
Keet, A.D, The Pyloric Sphincteric Cylinder in Health and Disease, Springer-Verlag, New York, Chapter 11, p. 44, http://med.plig.org/11, printed from the Internet on Nov. 6, 2009. |
Lee, B.H., et al., “New Self-Expandable Spiral Metallic Stent: Preliminary clinical Evaluation in Malignant Biliary Obstruction,” J. Vasc Interv Radiol., 6(4):635-640 (Jul.-Aug. 1995). |
Lee, S.H., “The Role of Oesophageal Stenting in the Non-Surgical Management of Oesophageal Strictures,” British J. Radiology, 74:891-900 (Oct. 2001). |
Park, B.P. et al., Malignant Obstruction of Gastric Outlet and Duodenum: Palliation with Flexible Covered Metallic Stents, Radiology 219(3):679-683 (2001). |
Parodi, J.C., M.D., “Endovascular Repair of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms,” Advances in Vascular Surgery, vol. 1, pp. 85-105 (1993). |
Pories, W.J., “Why Does the Gastric Bypass Control Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus?” Obesity Surgery, 2:303-313 (1992). |
Pories, W.J., et al., “Etiology of Type II Diabetes Mellitus: Role of the Foregut,” World J. Surg., 25:527-531 (2001). |
Rubino, F. and J. Marescaux, “Effect of Duodenal-Jejunal Exclusion in a Non-obese Animal Model of Type 2 Diabetes, A New Perspective for an Old Disease,” Annals of Surgery 239(1):1-11, Jan. 2004. |
Rubino, F., et al., “Potential of Surgery for Curing Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus,” Annals of Surgery 236(5): 554-559 (2002). |
Sandha, G. S. and Marcon, N. E., “Expandable Metal Stents for Benign Esophageal Obstruction,” Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Clinics of North America 9:(3)437-446 (1999). |
Search Report issued in European Patent Application No. 11169684.5, Date of Search: Sep. 23, 2011, 6 pages “Bariatric Sleeve.” |
Shim, C.S., et al., “Fixation of a Modified Covered Esophageal Stent: Its Clinical Usefulness for Preventing Stent Migration,” Endoscopy, 33(10):843-848 (Oct. 2001). |
Song, H.Y., et al., “Benign and Malignant Esophageal Strictures: Treatment with a Polyurethane-Covered Retrievable Expandable Metallic Stent1,” Radiology, 203(3):747-752 (Jun. 1997). |
Song, H.Y., et al., “Covered Retrievable Expandable Nitinol Stents in Patients with Benign Esophageal Strictures: Initial Experience1,” Radiology, 217:551-557 (Nov. 2000). |
Song, H.Y., et al., “Tracheobronchial Strictures: Treatment with a Polyurethane-Covered Retrievable Expandable Nitinol Stent—Initial Experience,” Radiology, 213:905-912 (Dec. 1999). |
Yates III, M. R., et al., “Palliation of Malignant Gastric and Small Intestinal Strictures With Self-Expandable Metal Stents,” Endoscopy 30:266-272 (1998). |
Yoon, C.J., et al., “Removal of Retrievable Esophageal and Gastrointestinal Stents: Experience in 113 Patients,” American J. of Roentgenology, 183:1437-1444 (Nov. 2004). |
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 13/098,750, mailed on Aug. 22, 2014, entitled: Methods of Treatment Using a Bariatric Sleeve. |
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 13/170,785, mailed on Jul. 8, 2014, entitled: Intestinal Sleeve. |
Supplemental Notice of Allowability for U.S. Appl. No. 13/170,785, mailed on Aug. 15, 2014, entitled: Intestinal Sleeve. |
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 14/102,065, entitled “Methods and Apparatus for Anchoring Within the Gastrointestinal Tract”, mailed Mar. 25, 2015. |
Supplemental Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 14/102,065, entitled “Methods and Apparatus for Anchoring Within the Gastrointestinal Tract”, dated Jun. 19, 2015. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20140303543 A1 | Oct 2014 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60528084 | Dec 2003 | US | |
60544527 | Feb 2004 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 10858851 | Jun 2004 | US |
Child | 11493487 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 13170785 | Jun 2011 | US |
Child | 14305518 | US | |
Parent | 12684309 | Jan 2010 | US |
Child | 13170785 | US | |
Parent | 11493487 | Jul 2006 | US |
Child | 12684309 | US |