Intra-articular joint replacement

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 8974536
  • Patent Number
    8,974,536
  • Date Filed
    Tuesday, May 25, 2010
    14 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, March 10, 2015
    9 years ago
Abstract
A method of forming a shoulder prosthesis includes forming a concave articular surface into an end portion of a humerus, including compacting bone of the end portion to define the concave articular surface. An implant having a convex articular surface is secured to a glenoid. The concave articular surface of the humerus is articulated with the convex articular surface of the implant.
Description
TECHNICAL FIELD

The present invention relates to a method and apparatus for implanting a prosthesis at the intersection of two or more bone, and in particular, to a method and apparatus for processing and implanting a resected portion of a humerus to act as an articular surface for an interpositional implant of a shoulder prosthesis.


BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

In the field of total shoulder prostheses, prostheses are commonly said to be inverted when they comprise a glenoid component that is integral with the glenoid surface of a scapula of a patient's shoulder and that delimits a convex articular surface and a humeral component that is integral with the humerus of the patient's shoulder and that delimits a concave articular surface. The cooperation of the articular surfaces of the glenoid and humeral components allow an articulated connection to be reproduced at the shoulder. However, it is common with this type of prosthesis that during adductive movement of the shoulder, the lower portion of the humeral prosthetic component strikes the pillar of the scapula, i.e. the lower portion of the glenoid located just below the glenoid prosthetic component (when the patient is standing upright). This interference between the humeral prosthetic component and the scapula limits the range of adductive movement of the shoulder and may cause pain to the patient or even lead to the prosthesis becoming dislodged due to, for example, osteolysis of the scapula.


Another method used to replace damaged shoulder joints is interpositional arthroplasty. The method of interpositional arthroplasty uses tissue from the patient or an artificial replacement to repair a damaged or malformed joint. An interpositional implant is positioned at the joint to act as an engagement surface between two adjacent bone structures to allow articular movement. In the particular field of interpositional shoulder arthroplasty, the humeral metaphysis is typically impacted to form an engagement surface for an interpositional implant positioned between a glenoid component (or glenoid) and a humeral component (or humeral metaphysis). However, if the cancellous bone in the humeral metaphysis is of poor or degraded quality, the cancellous bone may lead to gradual subsidence of the interpositional implant within the humeral metaphysis. It is thus desirable to develop an interpositional implant with a metaphyseal articular surface that will provide support and protection to the metaphyseal cancellous bone.


SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

Some embodiments relate to a method of forming a shoulder prosthesis, including forming a concave articular surface into an end portion of a humerus, including compacting bone of the end portion to define the concave articular surface. An implant having a convex articular surface is secured to a glenoid. The concave articular surface of the humerus is articulated with the convex articular surface of the implant.


Other embodiments relate to a method of forming a shoulder prosthesis, including resecting an end portion of a humerus to form a resected end of the humerus and a resected portion separated from the humerus, the resected portion having an outer convex surface and an inner surface. The inner surface of the resected portion is processed to comprise a concave articular surface. The outer convex surface of the resected portion is implanted in the resected end of the humerus. An implant having a convex articular surface is secured to a glenoid. The concave articular surface of the resected portion is articulated with the convex articular surface of the implant.


Still other embodiments relate to a method of forming a shoulder prosthesis, including forming a recess in an end portion of a humerus and disposing a reinforcing structure across at least a portion of the recess to form a concave articular surface of the humerus. The reinforcing structure is attached to the humerus. An implant having a convex articular surface is secured to a glenoid. The concave articular surface of the resected portion is articulated directly with the convex articular surface of the implant.


While multiple embodiments are disclosed, still other embodiments of the present invention will become apparent to those skilled in the art from the following detailed description, which shows and describes illustrative embodiments of the invention. Accordingly, the drawings and detailed description are to be regarded as illustrative in nature and not restrictive.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE SEVERAL VIEWS OF THE DRAWING


FIG. 1A is a schematic view of an intra-articular prosthesis implanted in a patient's shoulder in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention.



FIG. 1B is a schematic view of an alternate prosthesis implanted in a patient's shoulder in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention.



FIG. 2 is a schematic view of a cutting guide for a proximal portion of a humerus in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention.



FIG. 3 is a schematic view of a resected portion of the proximal portion of the humerus in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention.



FIG. 4 is a schematic view of a method of preparing a resected proximal portion of the humerus in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention.



FIG. 5 is a schematic view of a method and apparatus for implanting the resected portion of the proximal portion of the humerus in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention.



FIG. 6 is a schematic view of a resected portion implanted into a proximal portion of the humerus in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention.



FIG. 7 is a schematic view of a resected portion implanted into a proximal portion of the humerus using fasteners in accordance with an alternate embodiment of the present invention.



FIG. 8 is a schematic view of a resected portion implanted into a proximal portion of the humerus using sutures in accordance with an alternate embodiment of the present invention.



FIG. 9 is a schematic view of an interpositional implant engaged with an implanted resected portion in accordance with the present invention.



FIG. 10 is a schematic view of intra-articular prostheses implanted in a patient's hand in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention.



FIG. 11 is a schematic view of intra-articular prostheses implanted in a patient's foot in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION


FIG. 1A shows a schematic view of a prosthesis 10 including a glenoid component 12, a humeral component 14 and an interpositional implant 16. The glenoid component 12 is implanted in the scapula S of the glenoid G. The method and apparatus of the various embodiments of the present invention disclosed herein may be used with a variety of glenoid components, such as for example those disclosed in U.S. Pat. Nos. 7,033,396; 6,953,478; 6,761,740; 6,626,946; 5,702,447 and U.S. Publication Nos. 2004/0220673; 2005/0278030; 2005/0278031; 2005/0278032; 2006/0020344, which are hereby incorporated by reference. Although the prosthesis 10 is primarily discussed as being implanted in a patient's shoulder, the prosthesis 10 may also be modified and implanted in other locations of a patient's body without departing from the intended scope of the present invention. For example, the prosthesis 10 may be modified to be implanted in a patient's hip, ankle, hands, or feet.


In the illustrated embodiment, the glenoid component 12 includes an articular member 18 with a generally concave articular surface 20 that engages the interpositional implant 16. Given that the articular member 18 is positioned immediately adjacent the glenoid G, the interpositional implant 16 is remote from the resected surface of the glenoid G in the sense that, if the articular member 18 were omitted, the interpositional implant 16 would be directly juxtaposed with the glenoid G. Thus, on account of the articular member 18, the interpositional implant 16 and the humeral component 14 are laterally remote from the glenoid G, limiting the risk of the humerus H interfering with the bottom of the glenoid G, i.e. with the pillar P of the scapula S. Alternatively, an articular member 18 may not be required within the glenoid G. In this case, the interpositional implant 16 would articulate directly with the glenoid G.


The humeral component 14 includes an articular member 24 formed from a resected portion 30 (shown in FIG. 3) of the proximal humerus PH that is removed during processing of the humerus H. The proximal humerus PH is preferably resected such that the resected portion 30 is preferably a single, unitary piece. In this form, an outer convex surface 58 of the resected portion 30 is implanted into the proximal humerus PH as a single unit, rather than as fragments.


Alternatively, the resected portion 30 can be formed from a single piece or a plurality of pieces taken from the proximal humerus PH or other locations in the patient's body. Implantation of the resected portion 30 can be supplemented with bone graft material, such as for example a purée of bone substance, bone replacements, bone fillers, bone cements and/or bone adhesives, or a combination thereof. The bone graft material can be formed from the patient's bone, an allograft, a xenograft, or a combination thereof. Various bone replacements, bone fillers, bone cements and bone adhesives are disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 6,692,563 (Zimmerman), which is hereby incorporated by reference. Various additives can also be included with the resected portion, including, but not limited to bone growth agents and pain inhibitors.


As will be discussed further below, the resected portion 30 is prepared and impacted into the proximal humerus PH to form the articular member 24 having a concave articular surface 32. The preparation of the resected portion 30 can be performed ex vivo or in situ.


In the illustrated embodiment, the humeral component 14 includes an optional stem 22 located in the medullary cavity M of the humerus H. The proximal end 28 of the stem 22 supports the resected portion 30 and optionally serves as an attachment member. For example, a fastener 26 can optionally extend through the resected portion 30 and engage the stem 22. It will be appreciated that the stem 22 may be omitted entirely without departing from the intended scope of the present invention.


The interpositional implant 16 is positioned between the articular member 18 of the glenoid component 12 and the articular member 24 of the humeral component 14. The radius of the interpositional implant 16 is typically equal to or less than the radii of the concave surfaces 20 and 32 of the articular member 18 of the glenoid component 12 and the articular member 24 of the humeral component 14, respectively. When the interpositional implant 16 is positioned between the glenoid component 12 and the humeral component 14, as shown in FIG. 1A, the concave surfaces 20 and 32 are in mutual surface contact with the interpositional implant 16, allowing articular movements of the patient's shoulder.


In an alternate embodiment illustrated in FIG. 1B, the interpositional implant 16 is eliminated and a glenoid component 18 with a convex articular surface 19 is substituted. The articular member 24, created as outlines in FIG. 1A, engages directly with the convex articular surface 19.



FIGS. 2-9 illustrate various embodiments for processing and implanting the prosthesis 10 into the humerus H. It is to be understood that the method of implanting the prosthesis 10 described hereinafter is merely a non-limiting illustrative example of a method and instruments used to implant the prosthesis 10. In other words, the method and the instruments specified hereinafter can be used to implant prostheses of a broad range of structures, of which, for example, the glenoid and/or humeral components 12, 14 consist of a plurality of metallic, plastic and/or ceramic-type parts joined together. As previously mentioned, the interpositional implant 16 may also articulate directly with the glenoid G such that the glenoid component 12 is not included as part of the prosthesis 10.



FIG. 2 is a schematic view of a cutting guide 34 positioned over the proximal humerus PH. In order to prepare the proximal humerus PH for resection, the soft parts (i.e. cartilage) of the proximal humerus PH may optionally be removed using a deltopectoral or supero-external approach.


The cutting guide 34 includes a bell-shaped body 36 secured to a shaft 38. An interior surface of the body 36 has a concave surface from which the main center of curvature pertains substantially to an axis 40 from which the shaft 38 extends from the body 36. The body 36 is designed to cover the upper portion of the proximal humerus PH in the manner of a cap and is perforated to give the surgeon a better view of the proximal humerus PH when positioning the body 36. The body 36 is thus shaped to reproduce approximately the surface features of the upper proximal humerus PH of a normal anatomical humerus H. However, in practice, there will be a range of a plurality of homothetic guiding instruments 34 having bodies 36 which have respective dimensions associated with the size and the state of the patient's bones.


The shaft 38 of the cutting guide 34 is optionally provided with a protruding tube 42 centered on the axis 40 and the main center of curvature of the body 36. Once the body 36 is properly positioned over the proximal humerus PH, a guide pin 44 having a pointed distal end is introduced into the protruding tube 42 and inserted into the proximal humerus PH. The guide pin 44 preferably terminates before the cutting plane C-C′. The surgeon uses the distal surface 27 on the body 36 located in the cutting plane C-C′ to resect the portion 30 from the proximal humerus PH. Alternatively, the surgeon can cut free-hand without a template.



FIG. 3 shows a schematic view of the resected portion 30 of the proximal humerus PH. After the proximal humerus PH has been resected, the proximal humerus PH has a cut surface 66 where the resected portion 30 was removed. The resected portion 30 includes a convex outer surface 58 and an inner cut surface 50 of cancellous bone 52. In one embodiment, the resected portion 30 is prepared ex vivo by impacting the inner cut surface 50 to compress the cancellous bone 52 to form the generally inner convex surface 32. As a result, the inner convex surface 32 is a layer of compacted cancellous bone 52 pressed against the inner surface 54 of the cortical bone 56.


In another embodiment, the resected portion 30 is prepared ex vivo by removing the cancellous bone 52 from the cortical bone 56. As a result, the inner convex surface 32 is essentially the inner surface 54 of the cortical bone 56. Either of these procedures can also be performed in situ. That is, after the resected portion 30 is engaged with the proximal humerus PH.


In some embodiments, the cut surface 66 of the proximal humerus PH is prepared to receive the resected portion 30. A hemispherical reaming instrument 64, shown in FIG. 4, is used to form a concave surface 60 in the proximal humerus PH. The reaming instrument 64 includes a convex body 68 having a plurality of teeth 70 to shape the cut surface 66 into the desired form. The concave surface 60 is preferably the same shape as the outer convex surface 58 of the resected portion 30.


In another embodiment, the cut surface 66 (shown in dashed lines) is compacted or carved to form the concave surface 60 on the proximal humerus PH. Preparing the cut surface 66 of the proximal humerus PH may be performed using a variety of other techniques known in the art without departing from the intended scope of the present invention. Small holes may optionally be drilled through the concave surface 60 to enhance bone integration remodeling once the resected portion 30 is reversed and implanted in the humerus H.



FIG. 5 shows the resected portion 30 being impacted into engagement with the concave surface 60 of the proximal humerus PH. The resected portion 30 is positioned within the concave surface 60 such that the convex outer surface 58 engages the concave surface 60. An impacting instrument 78 is then used to drive the resected portion 30 into the proximal humerus PH to form the articular member 24 having a semi-spherical shape at the concave surface 60 of the proximal humerus PH. As the resected portion 30 is driven into the proximal humerus PH, cancellous bone at each side of the proximal humerus PH is compressed and forms to the shape of the concave surface 60.


In an alternate embodiment illustrated in FIG. 6, the resected portion 30 is compacted directly against the cut surface 66, without the reaming step shown in FIG. 4. By gradually integrating the resected portion 30 into the proximal humerus PH, a strong bony or fibrous-cartilaginous underlying support structure having the concave surface 60 is created to support the articular member 24. In addition, the resected portion 30 is used to isolate the cancellous bone 67 in the humerus H from synovial fluids. The resected portion 30 is preferably driven into the proximal humerus PH as a single unit such that the resulting articular member 24 is an integral piece and is not formed of fragmented pieces. The articular member 24 has a shape of a metaphyseal cup formed to cooperate with a variety of interpositional components, such as, for example, a full sphere, a lens-type free interpositional component, or a combination thereof. In one embodiment, the articular member 24 may have a shape of approximately one-third of a sphere.



FIG. 7 shows a schematic illustration of one embodiment of attaching the articular member 24 to the concave surface 60 of the proximal humerus PH using a plurality of pins 80. The heads 82 of the pins 80 are preferably flush with, or recessed below, the concave inner surface 32. Various bone anchors, known in the art, may also be used in place of the pins 80. The pins 80 may be formed of various materials, including, but not limited to: metallic components and polymeric components. In particular, the pins 80 may be formed of bioresorbable polymers. The pins 80 are particularly useful when the resected portion 30 includes a plurality of pieces 30A, 30B, 30C.


In one embodiment, a suture material 84 is optionally attached to one or more of the pins 80. The suture material 84 extends through the proximal humerus PH to the opposite side and is anchored to the cortical bone 86 using conventional techniques. The suture material 84 operates as a tension member to retain the resected portion 30 to the concave surface 60 of the proximal humerus PH.


In an alternate embodiment illustrated in FIG. 8, the resected portion 30 is attached to the proximal humerus PH using a plurality of peripheral sutures 90. The sutures 90 may be formed of various materials, including, but not limited to: metallic components and polymeric components. In particular, the sutures 90 may be formed of bioresorbable polymers. The resected portion 30 may be fixed within the proximal humerus PH by any fixation mechanism, or combination of fixation mechanisms, known in the art without departing from the intended scope of the present invention.


In one embodiment, a reinforcing structure 92, such as for example reinforcing fibers, a three-dimensional porous matrix or scaffold, is located between the concave surface 60 on the proximal humerus PH and the resected portion 30. In the illustrated embodiment, the reinforcing structure 92 is attached to the cortical bone 86 of the proximal humerus PH by the sutures 90. In one embodiment, the reinforcing structure 92 operates like a sling to limit further penetration of the resected portion 30 into the proximal humerus PH. In another embodiment, the reinforcing structure 92 promotes in-growth between the proximal humerus PH and the resected portion 30. Examples of such reinforcing structures include a porous matrix, a scaffold, a reticulated bioceramic framework, a structured porous tantalum and a synthetic fiber mesh. Various porous matrices and scaffoldings are disclosed in U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,479,271; 6,511,511; 6,605,117; 6,797,006; 6,902,584; and 7,250,550, which are hereby incorporated by reference. Although the reinforcing structure 92 is discussed as being used in conjunction with the resected portion 30, the reinforcing structure 92 may alternatively be used in place of the resected portion 30 as an articular surface for engaging the interpositional implant 16 (shown in FIGS. 1 and 9).


In another embodiment, the reinforcing structure 92 extends beyond the sutures 90. The reinforcing structure 92 may be made of any material, natural and synthetic, suitable for implantation. Preferably the reinforcing structure 92 is flexible to permit conformity with the proximal humerus PH. The reinforcing structure 92 material may also permit intraoperative cutting or other shaping of the reinforcing structure 92 to fit a surgical site. For example the reinforcing structure 92 may be intraoperatively shapeable by cutting with scissors. The reinforcing structure 92 may include natural tissues including fibrocartilage, fascia, pericardium, and/or other natural tissues. The reinforcing structure 92 may include synthetic materials including metals, polymers, ceramics, hydrogels and/or other suitable materials. A polymer reinforcing structure 92 may include resorbable and/or non-resorbable polymers. Examples of resorbable polymers include polylactic acid polymers, polyglycolic acid polymers, and/or other suitable resorbable polymers. Examples of non-resorbable polymers include polyolefins, polyesters, polyimides, polyamides, polyacrylates, polyketones, and/or other suitable non-resorbable polymers. A metal reinforcing structure 92 may include titanium, tantalum, stainless steel, and/or other suitable metals and alloys thereof. For example metal fibers may be woven into a porous flexible reinforcing structure 92.


The reinforcing structure 92 may be attached to the hard and/or soft tissues of the proximal humerus PH by mechanical fasteners 94, adhesives, tissue in-growth, and/or other suitable attachment mechanism. The attachment mechanism may be permanent and/or bioabsorbable. For example, the reinforcing structure 92 may be screwed, pinned, sutured, or stapled to the bone and/or soft tissue adjacent the joint. The reinforcing structure 92 may include preformed openings for receiving fasteners. The reinforcing structure 92 may include a reinforced edge to strengthen the reinforcing structure 92 against pullout of fasteners. For example, the edge may be reinforced by hemming, molding, braiding, embedding a cord, and/or by other suitable reinforcement mechanism. The reinforced edge may form a thicker portion of the reinforcing structure 92.



FIG. 9 shows the interpositional implant 16 positioned within the articular member 24 at the concave surface 60 of the proximal humerus PH. Referring again also to FIG. 1A, once the articular member 24 is fixed onto the proximal humerus PH or the stem 22 and the articular member 18 is fixed onto the glenoid G, the interpositional implant 16 is positioned between the articular member 24 and the articular member 18. In one embodiment, the interpositional implant 16 is a sphere or ball having a continuous convex surface 104. The interaction of the convex surface 104 of the interpositional implant 16 with the concave articular surface 32 of the articular member 24 and the concave surface 20 of the articular member 18 allows articulation of the prosthesis 10. The size of the interpositional implant 16 is selected such that the convex surface 104 of the interpositional implant 16 is engageable with both the concave surface 20 of the articular member 18 and the concave articular surface 32 of the articular member 24. In one embodiment, the interpositional implant 16 is formed of a polymeric material, metal, ceramic, or a combination thereof. In one embodiment, the interpositional implant 16 is coated with pyrolytic carbon such as that described in U.S. Pat. No. 6,436,146 (Hassler et al.) which is hereby incorporated by reference. Although FIG. 9 depicts the interpositional implant 16 as a sphere, the interpositional implant 16 may have any shape having at least two convex surfaces, such as a disc. The disc may articulate directly with the glenoid G and the humerus H without the need for articular member 18 of glenoid component 12 or articular member 24 of humeral component 14. In another embodiment, the interpositional implant may be replaced by a glenosphere formed of pyrolytic carbon. For example, a convex surface of the glenosphere, or reversed glenoid prosthesis, may be adapted to articulate directly with the reversed, concave surface of the humerus H, and thus eliminate the need for an interpositional implant.


As previously mentioned, the method of resecting natural bone and compacting the resected surface of the natural bone with the resected portion to form a concave articular surface for engagement with a convex articular surface of an interpositional implant to repair or replace a damaged joint is not limited to repairing or replacing a damaged shoulder.



FIG. 10 shows a hand having a first interpositional implant 100 implanted between metacarpal 102 and proximal phalange 104. The distal end 120 of the metacarpal 102 is resected and processed in a manner similar to the resection and processing of the glenoid and humeral components 12 and 14 (shown in FIG. 1A) described above, to create a concave articular surface 122. In the illustrated embodiment, the proximal end 124 of the proximal phalange 104 is also resected and processed to create a concave articular surface 126.



FIG. 10 also illustrates a second interpositional implant 106 implanted between metacarpal 108 and proximal phalange 110, and a third interpositional implant 112 implanted between proximal phalange 114 and intermediate phalange 116. The bones 102, 104, 108, 110, 114 and 116 adjacent the respective interpositional implants 100, 106 and 112 are preferably resected and processed in a manner similar to the resection and processing of the glenoid and humeral components 12 and 14 (shown in FIG. 1A) described above. In some embodiments, a natural concave articular surface of one of the bones at the intersection, such as for example on the proximal end 128 of the proximal phalange 110, may be sufficient to retain the interpositional implant 106, making resection unnecessary. The interpositional implants 100, 106 and 112 interact and function with the resected bones in a manner similar to the interpositional implant 16 described above.


In another embodiment, the proximal end 130 of the proximal phalange 114 is resected and processed as discussed herein. The naturally convex surface 132 of the metacarpal 134 engages directly with the concave articular surface 136, without the need for an interpositional implant.


As can be seen in FIG. 10, depending on the joint being repaired or replaced, the shape of the interpositional implants 100, 106 and 112 may be modified so that they are easily implantable between their respective components or bones. Although FIG. 10 depicts interpositional implants between metacarpal bones and proximal phalanges and an interpositional implant between a proximal phalange and a middle phalange, an interpositional implant may be positioned at any joint in the hand, for example, between a middle phalange bone and a distal phalange bone or between the trapezium or scaphoid and a metacarpal bone.



FIG. 11 shows a foot having a first interpositional implant 200 implanted between a metatarsal 202 and a proximal phalange 204 and a second interpositional implant 206 implanted between the proximal phalange 204 and a distal phalange 208. The bones 202, 204 and 208 adjacent the respective interpositional implants 200 and 206 are resected and processed in a manner similar to the resection and processing of the glenoid and humeral components 12 and 14 (shown in FIG. 1A) described above. Likewise, the interpositional implants 200 and 206 interact and function with the resected bones in a manner similar to the interpositional implant 16 described above.


Similar to the interpositional implants 100, 106 and 112 depicted in FIG. 10, the shape of the interpositional implants 200 and 206 may be modified so that they correspond to the shape of the resected bone structures within the foot. Although FIG. 11 depicts an interpositional implant between a metatarsal bone and a proximal phalange and an interpositional implant between a proximal phalange and a middle phalange, an interpositional implant may be positioned at any joint in the foot, for example, between a proximal phalange and a middle phalange or between a middle phalange and a distal phalange. Any of the variations disclosed herein can be used with the embodiments of FIGS. 10 and 11, such as for example, the reinforcing structure or fasteners.


Various modifications and additions can be made to the exemplary embodiments discussed without departing from the scope of the present invention. For example, while the embodiments described above refer to particular features, the scope of this invention also includes embodiments having different combinations of features and embodiments that do not include all of the described features. Accordingly, the scope of the present invention is intended to embrace all such alternatives, modifications, and variations as fall within the scope of the claims, together with all equivalents thereof.

Claims
  • 1. A method of forming a shoulder prosthesis, the method comprising: forming a concave articular surface into an end portion of a humerus, including compacting bone of the end portion to define the concave articular surface comprising a compacted layer of bone;securing an implant having a convex articular surface to a glenoid; andarticulating the concave articular surface of the humerus with the convex articular surface of the implant by placing the convex articular surface in direct contact with the compacted layer of bone.
  • 2. The method of claim 1, further comprising cutting an end portion of the glenoid to define a resurfaced glenoid and securing the implant to the resurfaced glenoid.
  • 3. The method of claim 1, wherein the implant is a glenoid component having an attachment surface opposite the convex articular surface, the attachment surface being secured to the glenoid.
  • 4. The method of claim 1, wherein the implant includes a glenosphere.
  • 5. The method of claim 1, further comprising selecting an implant having an articular surface including pyrolytic carbon.
  • 6. The method of claim 1, wherein forming the concave articular surface further comprises reaming the end portion of the humerus to form a concave recess.
  • 7. The method of claim 1, wherein forming the concave articular surface further comprises drilling an aperture in the end portion of the humerus.
CROSS REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

The present application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/337,385, entitled Intra-Articular Joint Replacement, filed Dec. 17, 2008, which is a continuation-in-part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/020,913, entitled Method and Apparatus for Fitting a Shoulder Prosthesis, filed Jan. 28, 2008, which claims priority to French application no. 0700622, entitled “Méthode et ensemble d'instrumentation chirurgicale pour poser une prothèse totale d'épaule inversèe, et prothèese correspondante,” filed Jan. 30, 2007, and also claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application Ser. Nos. 60/888,437 filed Feb. 6, 2007 and 60/971,762 filed Sep. 12, 2007, both entitled “Method and Apparatus for Fitting an Inverted Shoulder Prosthesis,” and U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 61/015,042, entitled “Intra-Articular Joint Replacement,” filed Dec. 19, 2007, the complete disclosures of which are hereby incorporated by reference.

US Referenced Citations (235)
Number Name Date Kind
2666430 Gispert Jan 1954 A
3694820 Scales et al. Oct 1972 A
3815157 Skorecki et al. Jun 1974 A
3842442 Kolbel Oct 1974 A
3864758 Yakich Feb 1975 A
3869730 Skobel Mar 1975 A
3916451 Buechel et al. Nov 1975 A
3978528 Crep Sep 1976 A
3979778 Stroot Sep 1976 A
3992726 Freeman et al. Nov 1976 A
4003095 Gristina Jan 1977 A
4030143 Elloy et al. Jun 1977 A
4040131 Gristina Aug 1977 A
4054955 Seppo Oct 1977 A
4135517 Reale Jan 1979 A
4179758 Gristina Dec 1979 A
4206517 Pappas et al. Jun 1980 A
4261062 Amstutz et al. Apr 1981 A
4479271 Bolesky et al. Oct 1984 A
4550450 Kinnett Nov 1985 A
4693723 Gabard Sep 1987 A
4822370 Schelhas Apr 1989 A
4846840 Leclercq et al. Jul 1989 A
4865605 Dines et al. Sep 1989 A
4865609 Roche Sep 1989 A
4892549 Figgie, III et al. Jan 1990 A
4919670 Dale et al. Apr 1990 A
4957510 Cremascoli Sep 1990 A
4963155 Lazzeri et al. Oct 1990 A
5032132 Matsen, III et al. Jul 1991 A
5080673 Burkhead et al. Jan 1992 A
5080685 Bolesky et al. Jan 1992 A
5127920 MacArthur Jul 1992 A
5135529 Paxson et al. Aug 1992 A
5163961 Harwin Nov 1992 A
5181928 Bolesky et al. Jan 1993 A
5192329 Christie et al. Mar 1993 A
5201882 Paxson Apr 1993 A
5206925 Nakazawa et al. Apr 1993 A
5222984 Forte Jun 1993 A
5261914 Warren Nov 1993 A
5314479 Rockwood, Jr. et al. May 1994 A
5314487 Schryver et al. May 1994 A
5330531 Capanna Jul 1994 A
5358526 Tornier Oct 1994 A
5383936 Kubein-Meesenburg et al. Jan 1995 A
5425779 Schlosser Jun 1995 A
5443519 Averill et al. Aug 1995 A
5462563 Shearer et al. Oct 1995 A
5507817 Craig et al. Apr 1996 A
5507818 McLaughlin Apr 1996 A
5507824 Lennox Apr 1996 A
5534033 Simpson Jul 1996 A
5549682 Roy Aug 1996 A
5580352 Sekel Dec 1996 A
5702447 Walch et al. Dec 1997 A
5702457 Walch et al. Dec 1997 A
5702486 Craig et al. Dec 1997 A
5723018 Cyprien et al. Mar 1998 A
5728161 Camino et al. Mar 1998 A
5741335 Gerber et al. Apr 1998 A
5755807 Anstaett et al. May 1998 A
5779709 Harris, Jr. et al. Jul 1998 A
5800551 Williamson et al. Sep 1998 A
5879405 Ries et al. Mar 1999 A
5902340 White et al. May 1999 A
5910171 Kummer et al. Jun 1999 A
5928285 Bigliani et al. Jul 1999 A
5944758 Mansat et al. Aug 1999 A
5961555 Huebner Oct 1999 A
5984927 Wenstrom, Jr. et al. Nov 1999 A
6015437 Stossel Jan 2000 A
6027503 Khalili et al. Feb 2000 A
6033439 Camino et al. Mar 2000 A
6045582 Prybyla Apr 2000 A
6045583 Gross et al. Apr 2000 A
6102953 Huebner Aug 2000 A
6129764 Servidio Oct 2000 A
6165224 Tornier Dec 2000 A
6171341 Boileau et al. Jan 2001 B1
6197062 Fenlin Mar 2001 B1
6197063 Dews Mar 2001 B1
6203575 Farey Mar 2001 B1
6206925 Tornier Mar 2001 B1
6228120 Leonard et al. May 2001 B1
6267767 Strobel et al. Jul 2001 B1
6283999 Rockwood, Jr. Sep 2001 B1
6312467 McGee Nov 2001 B1
6334874 Tornier et al. Jan 2002 B1
6364910 Shultz et al. Apr 2002 B1
6368352 Camino et al. Apr 2002 B1
6368353 Arcand Apr 2002 B1
6398812 Masini Jun 2002 B1
6406495 Schoch Jun 2002 B1
6406496 Rüter Jun 2002 B1
6436144 Ahrens Aug 2002 B1
6436146 Hassler et al. Aug 2002 B1
6436147 Zweymuller Aug 2002 B1
6454811 Sherwood et al. Sep 2002 B1
6458136 Allard et al. Oct 2002 B1
6475243 Sheldon et al. Nov 2002 B1
6494913 Huebner Dec 2002 B1
6506214 Gross Jan 2003 B1
6508840 Rockwood, Jr. et al. Jan 2003 B1
6511511 Slivka et al. Jan 2003 B1
6514287 Ondrla et al. Feb 2003 B2
6520994 Nogarin Feb 2003 B2
6530957 Jack Mar 2003 B1
6541022 Murphy et al. Apr 2003 B1
6558425 Rockwood May 2003 B2
6569202 Whiteside May 2003 B2
6589281 Hyde, Jr. Jul 2003 B2
6605117 Kuberasampath et al. Aug 2003 B2
6620197 Maroney et al. Sep 2003 B2
6626946 Walch et al. Sep 2003 B1
6673114 Hartdegen et al. Jan 2004 B2
6673115 Resch et al. Jan 2004 B2
6679916 Frankle et al. Jan 2004 B1
6692563 Zimmermann Feb 2004 B2
6730252 Teoh et al. May 2004 B1
6736851 Maroney et al. May 2004 B2
6746487 Scifert et al. Jun 2004 B2
6749637 Bahler Jun 2004 B1
6755866 Southworth Jun 2004 B2
6761740 Tornier Jul 2004 B2
6767928 Murphy et al. Jul 2004 B1
6780190 Maroney Aug 2004 B2
6783549 Stone et al. Aug 2004 B1
6790234 Frankle Sep 2004 B1
6797006 Hodorek Sep 2004 B2
6863690 Ball et al. Mar 2005 B2
6875234 Lipman et al. Apr 2005 B2
6887277 Rauscher et al. May 2005 B2
6890358 Ball et al. May 2005 B2
6902584 Kwan et al. Jun 2005 B2
6942699 Stone et al. Sep 2005 B2
6953478 Bouttens et al. Oct 2005 B2
6969406 Tornier Nov 2005 B2
7011686 Ball et al. Mar 2006 B2
7033396 Tornier Apr 2006 B2
7051417 Michelson May 2006 B2
7066959 Errico Jun 2006 B2
7108719 Horber Sep 2006 B2
7166132 Callaway et al. Jan 2007 B2
7169184 Dalla Pria Jan 2007 B2
7175663 Stone Feb 2007 B1
7195645 Disilvestro et al. Mar 2007 B2
7238207 Blatter et al. Jul 2007 B2
7238208 Camino et al. Jul 2007 B2
7250550 Overby et al. Jul 2007 B2
7297163 Huebner Nov 2007 B2
7309360 Tornier et al. Dec 2007 B2
7329284 Maroney et al. Feb 2008 B2
7338498 Long et al. Mar 2008 B2
7338528 Stone et al. Mar 2008 B2
20010032021 McKinnon Oct 2001 A1
20010047210 Wolf Nov 2001 A1
20010049561 Dews et al. Dec 2001 A1
20020032484 Hyde, Jr. Mar 2002 A1
20020099381 Maroney Jul 2002 A1
20020138148 Hyde, Jr. Sep 2002 A1
20020143402 Steinberg Oct 2002 A1
20020151982 Masini Oct 2002 A1
20030009171 Tornier Jan 2003 A1
20030065397 Hanssen et al. Apr 2003 A1
20030097183 Rauscher et al. May 2003 A1
20030114933 Bouttens et al. Jun 2003 A1
20030149485 Tornier Aug 2003 A1
20030158605 Tornier Aug 2003 A1
20040006392 Grusin et al. Jan 2004 A1
20040034431 Maroney et al. Feb 2004 A1
20040064189 Maroney et al. Apr 2004 A1
20040064190 Ball et al. Apr 2004 A1
20040068320 Robie et al. Apr 2004 A1
20040133276 Lang et al. Jul 2004 A1
20040138754 Lang et al. Jul 2004 A1
20040148033 Schroeder Jul 2004 A1
20040193276 Maroney et al. Sep 2004 A1
20040193277 Long et al. Sep 2004 A1
20040193278 Maroney et al. Sep 2004 A1
20040210317 Maroney et al. Oct 2004 A1
20040220673 Pria Nov 2004 A1
20040220674 Pria Nov 2004 A1
20040225367 Glien et al. Nov 2004 A1
20040230197 Tornier et al. Nov 2004 A1
20040267370 Ondria Dec 2004 A1
20050008672 Winterbottom et al. Jan 2005 A1
20050015154 Lindsey et al. Jan 2005 A1
20050043805 Chudik Feb 2005 A1
20050049709 Tornier Mar 2005 A1
20050060039 Cyprien Mar 2005 A1
20050065612 Winslow Mar 2005 A1
20050085919 Durand-Allen et al. Apr 2005 A1
20050085921 Gupta et al. Apr 2005 A1
20050090902 Masini Apr 2005 A1
20050107882 Stone et al. May 2005 A1
20050113931 Horber May 2005 A1
20050119531 Sharratt Jun 2005 A1
20050143829 Ondria et al. Jun 2005 A1
20050165490 Tornier Jul 2005 A1
20050177241 Angibaud et al. Aug 2005 A1
20050197708 Stone et al. Sep 2005 A1
20050209700 Rockwood et al. Sep 2005 A1
20050216092 Marik et al. Sep 2005 A1
20050240267 Randall Oct 2005 A1
20050251263 Forrer et al. Nov 2005 A1
20050256584 Farrar Nov 2005 A1
20050267590 Lee Dec 2005 A1
20050278030 Tornier et al. Dec 2005 A1
20050278031 Tornier et al. Dec 2005 A1
20050278032 Tornier et al. Dec 2005 A1
20050278033 Tornier et al. Dec 2005 A1
20050288681 Klotz et al. Dec 2005 A1
20050288791 Tornier et al. Dec 2005 A1
20060004462 Gupta Jan 2006 A1
20060009852 Winslow et al. Jan 2006 A1
20060020344 Shultz et al. Jan 2006 A1
20060025796 Merced-O'Neill Feb 2006 A1
20060030946 Ball et al. Feb 2006 A1
20060241775 Buss Oct 2006 A1
20070156250 Seitz, Jr. et al. Jul 2007 A1
20070198087 Coleman et al. Aug 2007 A1
20070225817 Reubelt et al. Sep 2007 A1
20070225818 Reubelt et al. Sep 2007 A1
20070225821 Reubelt et al. Sep 2007 A1
20070244564 Ferrand et al. Oct 2007 A1
20070250174 Tornier et al. Oct 2007 A1
20070276509 Ratcliffe et al. Nov 2007 A1
20080183297 Boileau et al. Jul 2008 A1
20090125113 Guederian et al. May 2009 A1
20090287309 Walch et al. Nov 2009 A1
20100280518 Gary Nov 2010 A1
20110098822 Walch Apr 2011 A1
20110166661 Boileau et al. Jul 2011 A1
20110264153 Hassler et al. Oct 2011 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (57)
Number Date Country
426096 Dec 1966 CH
507704 May 1971 CH
19509037 Sep 1996 DE
19630298 Jan 1998 DE
0257359 Mar 1988 EP
0299889 Jan 1989 EP
0524857 Jan 1993 EP
0549480 Jun 1993 EP
0599429 Jun 1994 EP
0617934 Oct 1994 EP
0664108 Jul 1995 EP
0679375 Nov 1995 EP
0712617 May 1996 EP
0715836 Jun 1996 EP
0797964 Oct 1997 EP
0807426 Nov 1997 EP
0809986 Dec 1997 EP
0864306 Sep 1998 EP
0903127 Mar 1999 EP
0903128 Mar 1999 EP
0927548 Jul 1999 EP
1062923 Dec 2000 EP
1064890 Jan 2001 EP
1195149 Apr 2002 EP
1380274 Jan 2004 EP
1402854 Mar 2004 EP
2216981 Sep 1974 FR
2248820 May 1975 FR
2545352 Nov 1984 FR
2574283 Jun 1986 FR
2652498 Apr 1991 FR
2664809 Jan 1992 FR
2699400 Jun 1994 FR
2704747 Nov 1994 FR
2721200 Dec 1995 FR
2726994 May 1996 FR
2737107 Jan 1997 FR
2835425 Aug 2003 FR
2836039 Aug 2003 FR
749392 Jul 1980 SU
WO 9107932 Jun 1991 WO
WO 9309733 May 1993 WO
WO 9617553 Jun 1996 WO
WO 9846172 Oct 1998 WO
WO 9949792 Oct 1999 WO
WO 9965413 Dec 1999 WO
WO 0015154 Mar 2000 WO
WO 0041653 Jul 2000 WO
WO 0147442 Jul 2001 WO
WO 0239931 May 2002 WO
WO 0239933 May 2002 WO
WO 02067821 Sep 2002 WO
WO 03005933 Jan 2003 WO
WO 03094806 Nov 2003 WO
WO 2007109291 Sep 2007 WO
WO 2007109319 Sep 2007 WO
WO 2007109340 Sep 2007 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (39)
Entry
John M. Fenlin Jr., M.D., Symposium on Surgery of the Shoulder, “Total Glenohumeral Joint Replacement,” Orthopedic Clinics of North America, vol. 6, No. 2, Apr. 1975, pp. 565-583.
“Aequalis-Fracture Suture Technique in 5 Steps,” Tornier, Inc.
“Aequalis-Fracture Shoulder Prosthesis—Surgical Technique,” Tornier, Inc.
“Aequalis® Press-Fit Shoulder Prosthesis—Surgical Technique,” Tornier, Inc.
“Anatomical Shoulder™—Cemented Shoulder Prosthesis Product Information and Surgical Technique,” Sulzer Medica, 2000.
“Anatomical Shoulder™ System Surgical Technique—Removable head option for improved surgical results,” Zimmer, Inc., 2004.
Bigliani/Flatow®—The Complete Shoulder Solution, 4-Part Fracture of the Humerus Surgical Technique, Zimmer, Inc., 2000.
“Bio-Modular® / Bi-Polar Shoulder Arthroplasty,” Biomet, Inc., 1997.
“Bio-Modular® Choice, Shoulder System,” Biomet Orthopedics, Inc., 2004.
“Bio-Modular Total Shoulder Surgical Technique,” Biomet Orthopedics, Inc., 2001.
“Copeland™ Humeral Resurfacing Head,” Biomet Orthopedics, Inc., 2001.
“Global C.A.P.™ Surgical technique, resurfacing humeral head implant,” DePuy International, Ltd., 2004.
Boileau, et al. “Adaptability and modularity of shoulder prosthese,” Maitrise Orthopédique, https://www.maitriseorthop.com/corpusmaitri/orthopaedic/prothese—epaule—orthop/boileau—us.shtml, Jan. 3, 2006.
Boileau, et al. “Arthroscopic Repair of Full-Thickness Tears of the Supraspinatus: Does the tendon really heal?,” The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc., pp. 1229-1240, 2005.
“Design Rationale,” Latitude®.
Klein, Travis J., et al. “Mechanically favorable bone remodeling in rotator cuff arthropathy patients with good function,” Minneapolis Sports Medicine Center and University of Minnesota.
Mansat, Michel, “Neer 3™, Surgical Technique for Fractrures,” Smith & Nephew, 2000.
Molé, M.D., et al., “Aequalis-Reversed™ Shoulder Prosthesis, Surgical Technique,” Tornier, Inc.
Nicholson, Gregory P., “Arthroplasty and Rotator Cuff Deficiency,” Chapter 7, pp. 149-166.
“Offset Head, Bio-Modular® Total Shoulder,” Biomet, Inc. 2000.
“The Foundation® Total Shoulder System,” Encore Surgical.
“The Townley Modular Shoulder, Design by Reason,” Biopro, Inc.
Zimmer® Bigliani/Flatow®—The Complete Shoulder Solution, Total Shoulder Arthroplasty Surgical Technique, Zimmer, Inc., 2003.
“Zimmer® Shoulder Retractors,” Zimmer, Inc., 2000.
“Anatomic Glenoid, Surgical Technique,” Smith & Nephew, 2000.
“Anatomical Shoulder™ System—The new removable head option,” Zimmer Inc., 2004.
“Delta CTA™ Reverse Shoulder Prosthesis,” DePuy International, Ltd., 2004.
Cofield, M.D., Robert H. “Cofield2 Total Shoulder System, Surgical Technique,” Smith & Nephew, 1997.
“Aequalis®—Glenoid Keeled and Pegged—Surgical Technique,” Tornier, Inc.
“Bigliani/Flatow®—The Complete Shoulder Solution, Designed by Shoulder Surgeons for Shoulder Surgery,” Zimmer, Inc., 2001.
“Tornier Aequalis® Reversed 2 Prong Capsular Retractor,” Tornier, Inc., Oct. 8, 2005.
“Tornier Aequalis® Reversed Shoulder G2 Baseplate,” Tornier, Inc., Oct. 8, 2005.
“Tornier Surgical Technique Addendum, Tornier Aequalis® Reversed Hemi-Adaptor Technique,” Tornier, Inc., Aug. 8, 2005.
“Tornier Surgical Technique Addendum, Aequalis® Reversed Shoulder Polyethylene Insert,” Tornier, Inc., Aug. 8, 2005.
Beuchel M.D., Frederick F. “Beuchel-Pappas™ Modular Salvage Shoulder System,” Endotec, Inc., 2000.
Beuchel M.D., Frederick F. “Beuchel-Pappas™ Resurfacing Shoulder System,” Endotec, Inc., 2000.
Beuchel M.D., Frederick F. “Beuchel-Pappas™ Total Shoulder System,” Endotec, Inc., 2000.
Hertel M.D., PD, Ralph. “Technical considerations for implantation of EPOCA glenoid components (Leseprobe),” EPOCA Newsletter, May 14, 2001.
Apoil, André “A Condyle for the Rotator Cuff Muscles, the total shoulder prosthesis,” Aesculap®, 1994.
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20110098822 A1 Apr 2011 US
Provisional Applications (3)
Number Date Country
60888437 Feb 2007 US
60971762 Sep 2007 US
61015042 Dec 2007 US
Continuations (1)
Number Date Country
Parent 12337385 Dec 2008 US
Child 12787124 US
Continuation in Parts (1)
Number Date Country
Parent 12020913 Jan 2008 US
Child 12337385 US