Intra-domain and inter-domain bridging over MPLS using MAC distribution via border gateway protocol

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 9225640
  • Patent Number
    9,225,640
  • Date Filed
    Friday, September 6, 2013
    10 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, December 29, 2015
    8 years ago
Abstract
In one embodiment, a method includes receiving, by a first autonomous system border router (ASBR) of a first autonomous system (AS), a first plurality of provider-provisioned media access control (B-MAC) addresses via Interior Border Gateway Protocol (I-BGP). Each of first plurality of B-MAC addresses is associated with a provider edge (PE) device of the first AS. The first ASBR sends the first plurality of B-MAC addresses to a second ASBR of a second AS using Exterior Border Gateway Protocol (E-BGP). The first ASBR also receives via E-BGP a second plurality of B-MAC addresses each of which is associated with a PE device of the second AS. The first ASBR then distributes the second plurality of B-MAC addresses to each of the PE devices of the first AS using I-BGP.
Description
TECHNICAL FIELD

This disclosure relates generally to the field of digital computer networks; more particularly, to switching of data packets both in an autonomous system (AS) and between autonomous systems.


BACKGROUND

A LAN is a high-speed network that supports many computers connected over a limited distance (e.g., under a few hundred meters). A Virtual Local Area Network (VLAN) is mechanism by which a group of devices on one or more LANs is configured using management software so that they can communicate as if they were attached to the same LAN, when in fact they are located on a number of different LAN segments. Since VLANs commonly span many switches across different LAN segments, sharing of Virtual LANs by a common set of infrastructure switches is achieved by inserting a VLAN identifier (VID) or tag into the Ethernet frame header to provide differentiation between traffic flow, i.e., separate service or customer instance. The customer identifier is frequently referred to as the service instance identifier since it identifies the service provided for a particular customer. A Virtual Private LAN Service (VPLS) service emulates a VLAN over an MPLS/IP network allowing the sites for a given VLAN to be geographically dispersed. If these sites are located in different Administrative System domains (ASes), then Multi-Protocol Border Gateway Protocol (MP-BGP) is used for communication across these domains for an MPLS/IP network.


Currently, bridged services for Metro Ethernet networks (ELAN or EVLAN) are offered over MPLS using an overlay topology where Provider Edge devices (PEs) are connected using pseudowires (PWs). A PW is a virtual connection between two PE devices. In the context of the VPLS service, a PW can be thought of as point-to-point virtual link for each service offered between a pair of Virtual Switch Instances (VSIs) within the PEs that emulates an Ethernet Virtual LAN function in terms of media access control (MAC) address learning and forwarding. Each VSI can be thought of as a virtual Ethernet switch for a given customer service instance, and each PW can be thought of as a virtual link connecting these virtual switches over a Packet Switched Network.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

The present invention will be understood more fully from the detailed description that follows and from the accompanying drawings, which however, should not be taken to limit the invention to the specific embodiments shown, but are for explanation and understanding only.



FIG. 1 illustrates an example packet-based network that includes a MPLS/IP provider backbone or core network.



FIG. 2 illustrates an example Ethernet frame format for data packet transmission over the backbone network shown in FIG. 1.



FIG. 3 illustrates an example method of operation for the network of FIG. 1.



FIG. 4 illustrates an example network with inter-autonomous system learning.



FIG. 5 illustrates an example network that shows population of routing information bases in an inter-autonomous system.



FIG. 6 illustrates an example method of operation for the system of FIG. 5.



FIG. 7 illustrates an example network device or node.





DESCRIPTION OF EXAMPLE EMBODIMENTS

In the following description specific details are set forth, such as device types, system configurations, communication methods, etc., in order to provide a thorough understanding of the present invention. However, persons having ordinary skill in the relevant arts will appreciate that these specific details may not be needed to practice the embodiments described.


In the context of the present application, a computer network is a geographically distributed collection of interconnected subnetworks for transporting data between nodes, such as intermediate nodes and end nodes (also referred to as endpoints). A local area network (LAN) is an example of such a subnetwork; a plurality of LANs may be further interconnected by an intermediate network node, such as a router, bridge, or switch, to extend the effective “size” of the computer network and increase the number of communicating nodes. Examples of the devices or nodes include servers, mixers, control units, and personal computers. The nodes typically communicate by exchanging discrete frames or packets of data according to predefined protocols.


A customer equipment or customer edge (CE) device, as those terms are used in the present disclosure, refers to a customer node or device that connects to the service provider. A provider edge (PE) device refers to a device or node that is used to connect CE devices to the service provider network. A PE device is typically associated with a provider core or backbone network. A PE may connect directly with one or more CEs (or with other PE devices) associated with a service provider access network. A PE device capable of a bridging function can provide Virtual LAN service to the CE devices as if they are connected to a LAN segment. A hierarchical network typically consists of access networks and core networks with user-facing PE devices (u-PEs) at the edge of the access network and network-facing PE devices (n-PEs) at the edge of their core network.


In the context of the present application, an autonomous system border router (ASBR) is a service provider device that redistributes routes from one Autonomous System (AS) or domain into another one. This functionality can be implemented within an n-PE or it can be in a different device. The Border Gateway Protocol (BGP) is a system routing protocol used to exchange routing information for the Internet and is commonly used between Internet service providers (ISPs). ISPs typically use BGP to exchange customer and ISP routes. When BGP is used between autonomous systems (ASes), the protocol is referred to as External BGP (E-BGP). If a service provider is using BGP to exchange routes within an AS, then the protocol is referred to as Interior BGP (I-BGP). Routes learned via BGP have associated properties or attributes that are used to determine the best route to a destination when multiple paths exist to a particular destination.


Overview


In one embodiment, a method is provided that includes the steps of learning, by a PE device of an AS, MAC addresses of a plurality of other PE devices of the AS. The learning is performed as a control plane function with the MAC addresses being stored in a table. The PE device then receives a packet data unit (PDU) encapsulated in a frame, with the frame including a MAC destination address. The PE device then performs a lookup in the table to determine a port associated with the MAC destination address.


According to another embodiment of the present invention, I-BGP is utilized to distribute provider-provisioned backbone MAC (B-MAC) addresses among different PE devices within a single autonomous system (AS). In another embodiment, E-BGP protocol is also used to distribute B-MAC addresses among different ASes. All learning of B-MAC addresses among the PEs—whether in intra-AS or inter-AS—is performed in the control plane. That is, no learning is performed in the data plane, thereby obviating the need for pseudowires. In one implementation the extended community attribute, which provides a way of grouping destinations, i.e., communities, to which routing decisions (such as acceptance, preference, and redistribution) can be applied, is utilized to pass B-MAC addresses during control plane learning.


In a specific embodiment, customer MAC (C-MAC) addresses are learned in the data plane by the u-PE devices. Each of the u-PE devices encapsulates C-MAC addresses with B-MAC addresses using IEEE 802.1ah encapsulation. These B-MAC addresses are distributed using I-BGP among PEs within an AS, and using E-BGP between different ASes. The extended community attribute is utilized by the E-BGP to pass B-MAC updates from one autonomous system border router (ASBR) (associated with one AS) into an ASBR associated with a different AS.



FIG. 1 illustrates an example packet-based network 10 that includes a MPLS/IP provider backbone or core network 11. Provider edge (PE) devices 14-16 are shown distributed about backbone network 11. Each of PE devices 14-16 are respectively shown connected to customer edge (CE) devices 17-19. Thus, the example of FIG. 1 is that of a single autonomous system (AS). In the embodiment shown, B-MAC address learning is performed in the control plane using BGP, thereby obviating use of pseudowires. This paradigm facilitates so-called “MAC-in-MAC” encapsulation where frames are first encapsulated and then transmitted to destination addresses (PEs) via ordinary MPLS tunneling without pseudowires. To achieve this functionality, each of PE devices 14-16 includes software (or firmware) plug-ins, modules, or enhancements that implement the various features and functions described herein.



FIG. 2 illustrates an example Ethernet frame format for data packet transmission over the backbone network shown in FIG. 1. Frame 20 includes a provider-provisioned B-MAC destination address (B-MAC DA) bit field 21, a provider-provisioned B-MAC source address (B-MAC SA) bit field 32, a service instance identifier (I-SID) field 23 associated with a particular customer (I-SID field 23 defines the service instance that the frame should be mapped to), an Ethertype field 24 (an Ethertype is a field in the Ethernet networking standard that is used to indicate which protocol is being transported on an Ethernet frame), and finally, the packet data unit (PDU) field 25, which contains the payload of the frame.


In an intra-AS topology such as that shown in the example of FIG. 1, each PE device may be configured to distribute B-MAC addresses in the control plane, and forward frames in the data plane, according to the example method shown in FIG. 3. The process starts the process of FIG. 3 starts with the learning phase, wherein each of the PE devices in the autonomous system exchange B-MAC addresses and I-SIDs (block 31) along with their next hop BGP IP addresses. The learning process occurs in the control plane via the BGP protocol. In other words, each PE learns via BGP which B-MAC addresses sit behind which PE devices. More specifically, each of the PE devices exchange routing information via BGP messages sent/received from the various other PE devices in the AS. Routes learned via BGP have associated properties that are used to determine the best route to a destination device.


Once the PE devices have finished exchanging routing information, the learning phase is complete. When a customer wants to send data (in the form of data packets) to a certain customer site (e.g., CE2), the sender customer equipment or edge device (e.g., CE1) transmits a packet frame, which is then received by the PE device (e.g., PE1) of the core or backbone network. This is shown by block 32. For an unknown customer unicast frame, the frame gets encapsulated in an 802.1ah frame with a B-MAC multicast address as the destination address, which is then sent over an MPLS multipoint LSP.


On the receiving PE, the customer source MAC address gets associated with B-MAC SA (e.g., customer MAC learning is performed in the data-plane even though provider B-MAC learning is performed in control plane). In contrast, for a known customer unicast frame, the frame gets encapsulated in an 802.1ah frame with the corresponding destination B-MAC address, which then, in turn, gets encapsulated in an MPLS frame with the BGP next hop corresponding to that of the PE associated with the destination B-MAC address. The receiving PE device forwards the packet to the egress line card based on either MPLS label or destination B-MAC address.


At the egress line card of the receiving PE, the MPLS and B-MAC headers are de-capsulated and the packet is forwarded based on customer destination MAC address (block 33). Furthermore, at the egress line card of the receiving PE, the customer source MAC address is learned and is associated with the source B-MAC address of the receiving frame. Because all of the B-MAC address learning has already been performed, the receiving provider edge device already knows which BGP next hop address to use for a given B-MAC address and no data-plane learning is required for B-MAC addresses.


Note that the source provider edge device (e.g. PE1) first encapsulates the frame and then forwards the encapsulated frame to the destination provider edge device (e.g. PE2) via an ordinary MPLS tunnel associated with the BGP next hop of PE1 (which is PE2). This is shown in block 34. Thereafter, the receiving PE device may forward the frame to the destination customer site (e.g. CE2).



FIG. 4 illustrates an example network 39 with inter-autonomous system learning between AS 40 and AS 49. In this example, AS 40 comprises PE devices 41-43 (labeled PE1-PE3) and ASBR 47 (ASBR1). Similarly, AS 40 comprises PE devices 44-46 (labeled PE4-PE6) and ASBR 48 (ASBR2). Learning is shown occurring from left to right the figure; that is, each of the PE devices 41-43 use I-BGP to send or advertise their associated B-MAC addresses to ASBR 47. However, it is appreciated that exchange of information occurs in both directions. In other words, although FIG. 4 shows information transfer occurring from left to right, routing information transfer or exchange also occurs in the opposite direction as part of the learning process.


Learning occurs between AS 40 & AS 49 when ASBR 47 sends or advertises the B-MAC addresses of PE devices 41-43 to ASBR 48. This is shown in the Figure by arrow 50 with the associated notation “Learn B-MAC1-3”. E-BGP is utilized for exchange of B-MAC addresses and I-SID information between ASBRs 47 & 48. ASBR 48 then sends or distributes this routing information to each of the PE devices 44-46. Although not shown explicitly, PE devices 44-46 also send their B-MAC addresses and I-SIDS to ASBR 48, which then sends this information to ASBR 47. Once received by ASBR 47, this routing information (e.g., B-MAC4-6) may be distributed to each of PE devices 41-43. Practitioners in the art will appreciate that according to this approach learning is a mathematical function of the sum of the number of provider edge devices in the two autonomous systems.


Once learning has been completed, forwarding involves the process of looking up the B-MAC address of the destination in the stored forwarding tables.



FIG. 5 illustrates an example network 70 that shows population of routing information bases (RIBs) for an inter-autonomous system. FIG. 5 shows AS 71 comprising ASBR 74 and PE device 73, with RIBs and forwarding information bases (FIBs) 63 & 64, and 61 & 62, respectively. On the right-hand side, AS 72 is shown comprising ASBR 75 and PE device 76 having RIBs and FIBs 67 & 68, and 80 & 81, respectively.


Each RIB consists of a table of entries that identify a destination, the subnetwork over which packets should be forwarded to reach that destination (also known as the next hop), and some form of routing metric. The information contained in the RIB is used to compute the actual routes (“next hops”), which are stored in the FIB of the respective device. The FIB therefore contains all the routes that could potentially be advertised to all neighboring routers within the next set of announcements. These routes are also the same set of routes used to forward IP datagrams.


Within each autonomous system, routing information is advertised or sent between devices during control plane learning using I-BGP. For instance, in AS 71, RIB 61 of PE device 73 is shown (by arrow 65) populating RIB 63 of ASBR 74 with its B-MAC and I-SID information. ASBR 74, in turn, sends this routing information to ASBR 75 using E-BGP (as shown by arrow 66), where it populates RIB 67. ASBR 75 than distributes this routing information to PE device 76 (as shown by arrow 69). PE device 76 stores the received routing information in RIB 80. It is appreciated that exchange of routing information also occurs in the opposite direction; that is, from PE device 76 to ASBR 75 (via I-BGP), then from ASBR 75 to ASBR 74 (via E-BGP), and then from ASBR 74 to PE device 73 (via I-BGP).


Each of the above steps is shown in FIG. 6, which illustrates an example method of operation for the system of FIG. 5. At block 75, a first PE device (PE1) uses I-BGP to populate the RIB of its associated ASBR (ASBR1) with its B-MAC address and I-SID information. Next, ASBR1 uses E-BGP to populate the RIB of the ASBR of the other autonomous system (e.g., ASBR2) with the MAC address and I-SID information of PE1. This is shown in FIG. 6 by block 76.


In one embodiment, the extended community attribute of E-BGP is utilized to pass the routing information from one ASBR to another ASBR. The BGP community attribute is an optional transitive attribute of variable length. The attribute consists of a set of four octet values that specify a community. The community attribute values are encoded with an AS number in the first two octets, with the remaining two octets defined by the AS. A prefix can have more than one community attribute. A BGP speaker that sees multiple community attributes in a prefix can act based on one, some or ail the attributes. A router has the option to add or modify a community attribute before the router passes the attribute on to other peers.


Once its RIB has been populated with routing information provided by ASBR1, ASBR2 uses I-BGP to populate the RIB of the destination PE device (PE2) with the MAC address and I-SID information of PE1. This final step is shown by block 77.


To reiterate, B-MAC address redistribution across ASes works as follows. I-BGP and E-BGP instances share the same B-MAC RIB. Any updates to the RIB table by the I-BGP instance are reflected onto the E-BGP instance using a B-MAC redistribution API. The extended community attribute of BGP may be used to pass B-MAC updates (add/delete) from one ASBR into another ASBR (between autonomous systems), or from one ASBR into a PE device within the same AS. E-BGP further installs the routes in the B-MAC RIB through which the route is redistributed via I-BGP in another AS.



FIG. 7 illustrates an example network device or node 50 which typically comprises a number of basic subsystems including a processor subsystem 51, a main memory 52 and an input/output (I/O) subsystem 55. Data is transferred between main memory (“system memory”) 52 and processor subsystem 51 over a memory bus 53, and between the processor and I/O subsystems over a system bus 56. Examples of the system bus may include the conventional lightning data transport (or hyper transport) bus and the conventional peripheral component [computer] interconnect (PCI) bus. Node 50 may also comprise other hardware units/modules 54 coupled to system bus 56 for performing additional functions. Processor subsystem 51 may comprise one or more processors and a controller device that incorporates a set of functions including a system memory controller, support for one or more system buses and direct memory access (DMA) engines. In general, the single-chip device is designed for general-purpose use and is not heavily optimized for networking applications.


In a typical networking application, packets are received from a framer, such as an Ethernet media access control (MAC) controller, of the I/O subsystem attached to the system bus. A DMA engine in the MAC controller is provided a list of addresses (e.g., in the form of a descriptor ring in a system memory) for buffers it may access in the system memory. As each packet is received at the MAC controller, the DMA engine obtains ownership of (“masters”) the system bus to access a next descriptor ring to obtain a next buffer address in the system memory at which it may, e.g., store (“write”) data contained in the packet. The DMA engine may need to issue many write operations over the system bus to transfer all of the packet data.


It should also be understood that elements of the present invention may also be provided as a computer program product which may include a machine-readable medium having stored thereon instructions which may be used to program a computer (e.g., a processor or other electronic device) to perform a sequence of operations. Alternatively, the operations may be performed by a combination of hardware and software. The machine-readable medium may include, but is not limited to, floppy diskettes, optical disks, CD-ROMs, and magneto-optical disks, ROMs, RAMs, EPROMs, EEPROMs, magnet or optical cards, propagation media or other type of media/machine-readable medium suitable for storing electronic instructions. For example, elements of the present invention may be downloaded as a computer program product, wherein the program may be transferred from a remote computer or telephonic device to a requesting process by way of data signals embodied in a carrier wave or other propagation medium via a communication link (e.g., a modem or network connection).


Additionally, although the present invention has been described in conjunction with specific embodiments, numerous modifications and alterations are well within the scope of the present invention. Accordingly, the specification and drawings are to be regarded in an illustrative rather than a restrictive sense.

Claims
  • 1. A method comprising: receiving, at a first provider edge device, media access control (MAC) addresses of a plurality of other provider edge devices, the MAC addresses being received during a control plane function using Border Gateway Protocol (BGP) and being stored in a table; andreceiving, by the first provider edge device from a first customer edge device, a data packet encapsulated in a first frame, the first frame including a first MAC destination address associated with a second customer edge device;encapsulating, by the first provider edge device, the first frame in a second frame, the second frame including a second MAC destination address associated with a second provider edge device;performing a lookup, by the first provider edge device, in the table to determine a port associated with the second MAC destination address in the second frame; andforwarding the second frame, by the first provider edge device, to one of other provider edge devices over a tunnel connected to the port without using a pseudowire.
  • 2. The method of claim 1 further comprising performing a lookup in the table using the second MAC destination address of the second frame, the lookup resulting in a port that connects with the one of the other provider edge devices using the tunnel.
  • 3. The method of claim 1 wherein the data packet is received from the first customer edge device and the first customer edge device is connected to the provider edge device.
  • 4. The method of claim 1 wherein the first frame further includes a first MAC source address associated with the first customer edge device, the method further comprising associating, in the table, the first MAC source address with a second MAC source address associated with the first provider edge device.
  • 5. The method of claim 1 wherein forwarding the data packet to one of the other provider edge devices over the tunnel includes forwarding the data packet to the second provider edge device based on the second MAC destination address.
  • 6. A method comprising: receiving, at a first border router of a first system, a first plurality of MAC addresses, each of first plurality of MAC addresses being associated with a provider edge device of the first system, the first plurality of MAC addresses being stored in a table at each provider edge device of the first system after being received at the provider edge devices during control plane learning using Interior Border Gateway Protocol (I-BGP);sending, by the first border router using Exterior Border Gateway Protocol (E-BGP), the first plurality of MAC addresses to a second border router of a second system;receiving, by the first border router using E-BGP, a second plurality of MAC addresses from the second border router, each of the second plurality of MAC addresses being associated with a provider edge device of the second system, the second plurality of MAC addresses being stored in a table at each provider edge device of the second system after being received at the provider edge devices during control plane learning using I-BGP; anddistributing, by the first border router using I-BGP, the second plurality of MAC addresses to each of the provider edge devices of the first system.
  • 7. The method of claim 6 wherein: the first border router and the second border router each have a routing information database;the routing information database of the second border router is populated using the sent first plurality of MAC addresses; andthe routing information database of the first border router is populated using the received second plurality of MAC addresses.
  • 8. The method of claim 7 further comprising: receiving, at the first border router, new MAC address information associated with the provider edge devices of the first system; andupdating the routing information database of the first border router to reflect the new MAC address information of the first system.
  • 9. The method of claim 8 further comprising: sending, by the first border router, the new MAC address information to the second border router; andupdating the routing information database of the second border router to reflect the new MAC address information of the first system.
  • 10. The method of claim 7 wherein the first plurality of MAC addresses is received by the first border router over a Multi-Protocol Label Switching (MPLS) network.
  • 11. An apparatus comprising: one or more processors; anda memory comprising one or more instructions executable at the processors, the one or more processors configured to execute the instructions, to: receive, at a first provider edge device, media access control (MAC) addresses of a plurality of other provider edge devices, the MAC addresses being received during a control plane function using Border Gateway Protocol (BGP) and being stored in a table; andreceive, by the first provider edge device from a first customer edge device, a data packet encapsulated in a first frame, the first frame including a first MAC destination address associated with a second customer edge device;encapsulate, by the first provider edge device, the first frame in a second frame, the second frame including a second MAC destination address associated with a second provider edge device;perform a lookup, by the first provider edge device, in the table to determine a port associated with the second MAC destination address in the second frame; andforward the second frame, by the first provider edge device, to one of other provider edge devices over a tunnel connected to the port without using a pseudowire.
  • 12. The apparatus of claim 11 wherein the data packet is received from the first customer edge device and the first customer edge device is connected to the provider edge device.
  • 13. The apparatus of claim 11 wherein the one or more processors is further configured, when executing the instructions, to perform a lookup in the table using a destination address of the frame, the lookup resulting in a port that connects with the one of the other provider edge devices via the tunnel.
  • 14. The apparatus of claim 11 wherein the first frame further includes a first MAC source address associated with the first customer edge device, and wherein the one or more processors is further configured, when executing the instructions, to associate, in the table, the first MAC source address with a second MAC source address associated with the first provider edge device.
  • 15. The apparatus of claim 11 wherein forwarding the data packet to one of the other provider edge devices over a MPLS tunnel includes forwarding the data packet to the second provider edge device based on the second MAC destination address.
  • 16. An apparatus comprising: one or more processors; anda memory comprising one or more instructions executable at the processors, the one or more processors configured to execute the instructions, to: receive, at a first border router of a first system, a first plurality of MAC addresses, each of first plurality of MAC addresses being associated with a provider edge device of the first system, the first plurality of MAC addresses being stored in a table at each provider edge device of the first system after being received at the provider edge devices during control plane learning using Interior Border Gateway Protocol (I-BGP);send, by the first border router using Exterior Border Gateway Protocol (E-BGP), the first plurality of MAC addresses to a second border router of a second system;receive, by the first border router using E-BGP, a second plurality of MAC addresses from the second border router, each of the second plurality of MAC addresses being associated with a provider edge device of the second system, the second plurality of MAC addresses being stored in a table at each provider edge device of the second system after being received at the provider edge devices during control plane learning using I-BGP; anddistribute, by the first border router using I-BGP, the second plurality of MAC addresses to each of the provider edge devices of the first system.
  • 17. The apparatus of claim 16 wherein: the first border router and the second border router each have a routing information database;the routing information database of the second border router is populated using the sent first plurality of MAC addresses; andthe routing information database of the first border router is populated using the received second plurality of MAC addresses.
  • 18. The apparatus of claim 17 wherein the one or more processors is further configured, when executing the instructions, to: receive, at the first border router, new MAC address information associated with the provider edge devices of the first system; andupdate the routing information database of the first border router to reflect the new MAC address information of the first system.
  • 19. The apparatus of claim 18 wherein the one or more processors are further configured, when executing the instructions, to: send, by the first border router, the new MAC address information to the second border router; andupdate the routing information database of the second border router to reflect the new MAC address information of the first system.
CROSS REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 11/827,772, flied Jul. 13, 2007 by Ali Sajassi et al and entitled “Intra-Domain and Inter-Domain Bridging over MPLS Using MAC Distribution via Border Gateway Protocol.”

US Referenced Citations (138)
Number Name Date Kind
5331637 Francis et al. Jul 1994 A
5818842 Burwell et al. Oct 1998 A
5848227 Sheu Dec 1998 A
6055364 Speakman et al. Apr 2000 A
6073176 Baindur et al. Jun 2000 A
6078590 Farinacci et al. Jun 2000 A
6188694 Fine et al. Feb 2001 B1
6301244 Huang et al. Oct 2001 B1
6304575 Carroll et al. Oct 2001 B1
6308282 Huang Oct 2001 B1
6373838 Law et al. Apr 2002 B1
6424657 Voit et al. Jul 2002 B1
6430621 Srikanth et al. Aug 2002 B1
6484209 Momirov Nov 2002 B1
6502140 Bolvie Dec 2002 B1
6519231 Ding et al. Feb 2003 B1
6611869 Eschelbeck et al. Aug 2003 B1
6665273 Goguen et al. Dec 2003 B1
6667982 Christie et al. Dec 2003 B2
6668282 Booth et al. Dec 2003 B1
6693878 Daruwalla et al. Feb 2004 B1
6732189 Novaes May 2004 B1
6757286 Stone Jun 2004 B1
6763469 Daniely Jul 2004 B1
6785232 Kotser et al. Aug 2004 B1
6785265 White et al. Aug 2004 B2
6789121 Lamberton et al. Sep 2004 B2
6798775 Bordonaro Sep 2004 B1
6801533 Barkley Oct 2004 B1
6813268 Kalkunte et al. Nov 2004 B1
6826698 Minkin et al. Nov 2004 B1
6829252 Lewin et al. Dec 2004 B1
6839348 Tang et al. Jan 2005 B2
6850521 Kadambi et al. Feb 2005 B1
6850542 Tzeng Feb 2005 B2
6852542 Mandel et al. Feb 2005 B2
6879594 Lee et al. Apr 2005 B1
6882643 Mauger et al. Apr 2005 B1
6892309 Richmond et al. May 2005 B2
6901048 Wang et al. May 2005 B1
6954436 Yip Oct 2005 B1
7009983 Mancour Mar 2006 B2
7016351 Farinacci et al. Mar 2006 B1
7082140 Hass Jul 2006 B1
7092389 Chase et al. Aug 2006 B2
7113512 Holmgren et al. Sep 2006 B1
7116665 Balay et al. Oct 2006 B2
7173934 Lapuh et al. Feb 2007 B2
7269132 Casey et al. Sep 2007 B1
7277936 Frietsch Oct 2007 B2
7310342 Rouleau Dec 2007 B2
7345991 Shabtay et al. Mar 2008 B1
7394756 Cook Jul 2008 B1
7408936 Ge et al. Aug 2008 B2
7408941 Martini et al. Aug 2008 B2
7433963 Anschutz Oct 2008 B2
7447207 Shankar Nov 2008 B2
7466703 Arunachalam et al. Dec 2008 B1
7487236 Zabihi et al. Feb 2009 B2
7599360 Edsall et al. Oct 2009 B2
7660303 Solomon et al. Feb 2010 B2
7688756 Allan et al. Mar 2010 B2
7693164 Busch et al. Apr 2010 B1
7746892 Mohan et al. Jun 2010 B2
7756022 Cook Jul 2010 B1
7865615 Mirtorabi et al. Jan 2011 B2
7872991 Chu et al. Jan 2011 B2
7974308 White et al. Jul 2011 B2
8036142 Saltsidis Oct 2011 B2
8223668 Allan et al. Jul 2012 B2
8260922 Aggarwal et al. Sep 2012 B1
8416789 Busch et al. Apr 2013 B1
8416790 Busch et al. Apr 2013 B1
8531941 Sajassi et al. Sep 2013 B2
8619791 Ould-Brahim Dec 2013 B2
8670452 Li et al. Mar 2014 B2
20020032780 Moore et al. Mar 2002 A1
20020087721 Sato et al. Jul 2002 A1
20020156612 Schulter et al. Oct 2002 A1
20020196795 Higashiyama Dec 2002 A1
20030012183 Butler Jan 2003 A1
20030036375 Chen et al. Feb 2003 A1
20030101243 Donahue et al. May 2003 A1
20030110268 Kermarec et al. Jun 2003 A1
20030112781 Kermode et al. Jun 2003 A1
20030142674 Casey Jul 2003 A1
20030154259 Lamberton et al. Aug 2003 A1
20030177221 Ould-Brahlm et al. Sep 2003 A1
20040095940 Yuan et al. May 2004 A1
20040102182 Reith et al. May 2004 A1
20040107382 Doverspike et al. Jun 2004 A1
20040125809 Jeng Jul 2004 A1
20040133619 Zelig et al. Jul 2004 A1
20040141501 Adams et al. Jul 2004 A1
20040151180 Hu et al. Aug 2004 A1
20040158735 Roese Aug 2004 A1
20040165525 Burak Aug 2004 A1
20040165600 Lee Aug 2004 A1
20040172559 Luo et al. Sep 2004 A1
20040196843 Zinin Oct 2004 A1
20040228291 Huslak et al. Nov 2004 A1
20040233891 Regan Nov 2004 A1
20040264364 Sato Dec 2004 A1
20050007951 Lapuh et al. Jan 2005 A1
20050013295 Regan et al. Jan 2005 A1
20050025143 Chen et al. Feb 2005 A1
20050030975 Wright et al. Feb 2005 A1
20050044265 Vinel et al. Feb 2005 A1
20050063381 Kayalackakom et al. Mar 2005 A1
20050063397 Wu et al. Mar 2005 A1
20050068972 Burns et al. Mar 2005 A1
20050099949 Mohan et al. May 2005 A1
20050152370 Meehan et al. Jul 2005 A1
20050157664 Baum Jul 2005 A1
20050157751 Rabie et al. Jul 2005 A1
20050163049 Yazaki et al. Jul 2005 A1
20050175022 Nishimura et al. Aug 2005 A1
20050190773 Yang et al. Sep 2005 A1
20050239445 Karaogguz et al. Oct 2005 A1
20050249124 Elie-Dit-Cosaque et al. Nov 2005 A1
20050286503 Oda et al. Dec 2005 A1
20050286541 Bottorff et al. Dec 2005 A1
20060007867 Elie-Dit-Cosaque et al. Jan 2006 A1
20060092847 Mohan et al. May 2006 A1
20060098607 Zeng May 2006 A1
20060120288 Vasseur et al. Jun 2006 A1
20060126496 Filsfils et al. Jun 2006 A1
20060182037 Chen et al. Aug 2006 A1
20060198323 Finn Sep 2006 A1
20060248277 Pande Nov 2006 A1
20060285500 Booth Dec 2006 A1
20060285501 Damm Dec 2006 A1
20070076719 Allan et al. Apr 2007 A1
20070115962 Mammoliti et al. May 2007 A1
20080008182 Deng Jan 2008 A1
20080144644 Allan et al. Jun 2008 A1
20080159309 Sultan et al. Jul 2008 A1
20080170583 Sultan et al. Jul 2008 A1
Non-Patent Literature Citations (2)
Entry
Lahti, “Quality of Service in the Point-to-Point Protocol over Ethernet,” in Google Scholar (on line URL:http://www.e.kth.se/˜e95—pla/exjobb/doc/Lahti—Thesis—QoS—in—PPPoE.pdf>) Oct. 1, 2000.
Chiruvolu et al., “Issues and Approaches on Extending Ethernet Beyond LANs”, IEEE Communications Magazine, Mar. 2004, pp. 80-86.
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20140010232 A1 Jan 2014 US
Continuations (1)
Number Date Country
Parent 11827772 Jul 2007 US
Child 14019728 US