Intra-osseous plate system and method

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 11969193
  • Patent Number
    11,969,193
  • Date Filed
    Monday, August 29, 2022
    2 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, April 30, 2024
    8 months ago
Abstract
An intra-osseous support structure can be used to fixate opposed portions of bone. In some examples, the intra-osseous support structure is positioned in openings formed in adjacent portions of bones. Fasteners are inserted through the bone portions to secure the intra-osseous support structure in the bones. Depending on the application, one or more external bone plates may also be applied to the bone portions. The external bone plate may be in compression while the intra-osseous support structure is in tension under load in situ.
Description
TECHNICAL FIELD

This disclosure relates generally to bone plate devices and methods for fixing bone using plate devices.


BACKGROUND

Bones, such as the bones of a foot, may be anatomically misaligned. In certain circumstances, surgical intervention is required to correctly align the bones to reduce patient discomfort and improve patient quality of life. Surgical intervention may involve cutting one or more of the misaligned bones and then physically realigning the bones into an anatomically corrected position. A bone plate or multiple bone plates may be used to hold the bones in the anatomically corrected position, helping to prevent the bones from shifting back to their misaligned position.


SUMMARY

In general, this disclosure is directed to bone fixation systems and techniques for fixating bones. In some examples, a bone plating system includes an intra-osseous support structure configured to be placed in an opening formed between adjacent bones. For example, during a tarsal-metatarsal fusion procedure in which a first metatarsal is realigned with respect to a second metatarsal, the intra-osseous support structure may be placed within the osseous tissue of the first metatarsal and the medial cuneiform, spanning the tarsal-metatarsal joint. An opening or groove may be formed in the end of the first metatarsal facing the medial cuneiform and also in the end of the medial cuneiform facing the first metatarsal, providing cavities in which opposed ends of the intra-osseous support structure are inserted. One or more fasteners can be used to secure the intra-osseous support structure to the bones in which the fastener is inserted. For instance, in the example of a tarsal-metatarsal fusion procedure, a fastener may be inserted into the medial cuneiform (e.g., from the dorsal toward the plantar side), securing the intra-osseous support structure to the medial cuneiform. A second fastener can be inserted into the first metatarsal (e.g., from the dorsal toward the plantar side), securing the intra-osseous support structure to the first metatarsal.


In some applications, a bone plate is also applied on exterior surfaces of the bone portions into which the intra-osseous support structure is inserted. For example, one or more flat or curved bone plates may be applied to exterior surfaces of bone portions containing the intra-osseous support structure. Depending on the configuration, the exterior bone plate(s) may be in compression while the intra-osseous support structure is in tensions under load, providing a balanced fixation system to effectively fixation opposed portions of bone.


In one example, a bone plating system is described that includes a fastener having a length and an intra-osseous support structure. The example specifies that the intra-osseous support structure is configured to be placed in an opening formed in a first bone portion and a second bone portion and has an aperture to receive the fastener.


In another example, a method of plating a bone is described. The method includes forming an opening in a first bone portion and a second bone portion and placing an intra-osseous support structure in the opening. The method further includes inserting a first fastener through the first bone portion and into the intra-osseous support structure and inserting a second fastener through the second bone portion and into the intra-osseous support structure.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS


FIG. 1 is a perspective view of a bone plating system in accordance with an embodiment of the invention.



FIG. 2 is a perspective view of a bone plating system in accordance with an embodiment of the invention.



FIG. 3 is a perspective view of a bone plating system in accordance with an embodiment of the invention.



FIG. 4 is a perspective view of a bone plating system in accordance with an embodiment of the invention, with bone portions depicted as transparent.



FIG. 5 is a top view of a bone plating system in accordance with an embodiment of the invention, with bone portions depicted as transparent.



FIG. 6 is a perspective view of a bone plating system in accordance with an embodiment of the invention, with bone portions depicted as transparent.



FIG. 7 is a perspective view of a bone plating system in accordance with an embodiment of the invention, with bone portions depicted as transparent.



FIG. 8 is a perspective view of a bone plating system in accordance with an embodiment of the invention, with bone portions depicted as transparent.



FIG. 9 is a side view of a bone plating system in accordance with an embodiment of the invention, with bone portions depicted as transparent.



FIG. 10 is an end view of a bone plating system in accordance with an embodiment of the invention, with bone portions depicted as transparent.



FIG. 11 is a side view of a bone plating system in accordance with an embodiment of the invention, with bone portions depicted as transparent.



FIG. 12 is an end view of a bone plating system in accordance with an embodiment of the invention, with bone portions depicted as transparent.



FIG. 13 is a top plan view of an intra-osseous support structure in accordance with an embodiment of the invention.



FIG. 14 is a top plan view of an intra-osseous support structure in accordance with an embodiment of the invention.



FIG. 15 is a perspective view of a bone plating system in accordance with an embodiment of the invention, with bone portions depicted as transparent.



FIG. 16 is a perspective view of a bone plating system in accordance with an embodiment of the invention, with bone portions depicted as transparent.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION

The following detailed description is exemplary in nature and is not intended to limit the scope, applicability, or configuration of the invention in any way. Rather, the following description provides some practical illustrations for implementing exemplary embodiments of the present invention. Examples of constructions, materials, dimensions, and manufacturing processes are provided for selected elements, and all other elements employ that which is known to those of ordinary skill in the field of the invention. Those skilled in the art will recognize that many of the noted examples have a variety of suitable alternatives.


Embodiments of the invention include a bone plating system. Embodiments of the system can be useful for providing structural support to bones subject to a surgical procedure, such as a bone alignment, osteotomy, fracture repair, and/or fusion procedure. Such a procedure may be performed, for example, on bones (e.g., adjacent bones separated by a joint or different portions of a single bone separated by a fracture) in the foot or hand. In one example, the procedure can be performed to correct an alignment between a metatarsal (e.g., a first metatarsal) and a cuneiform (e.g., a first cuneiform), such as a bunion correction. An example of such a procedure is a lapidus procedure. In another example, the procedure can be performed by modifying an alignment of a metatarsal (e.g., a first metatarsal). An example of such a procedure is a basilar metatarsal osteotomy procedure.


As shown in FIG. 1, embodiments of the bone plating system 10 include an intra-osseous support structure 20. As shown, the intra-osseous support structure can be adapted to be positioned intra-osseously. In such embodiments, the intra-osseous support structure is positioned within a thickness of a bone, such that both of its major surfaces face bone (e.g., cancellous bone). In the embodiment shown, the intra-osseous support structure 20 is adapted to be positioned within an opening 30 of a first bone portion 34 and a second bone portion 38, the opening leading to a cavity or void within the respective bone portions. As shown, in a bone portion having a dorsal surface 40 and a plantar surface 42, the opening can be formed closer to the plantar surface than the dorsal surface (e.g., between about one-half and two-thirds through the thickness of the bone). In certain embodiments, the opening crosses a centerline of one or both bone portions. In such embodiments, the bone defining the opening, and the intra-osseous support structure placed therein, will be in tension under load in situ. Such an intra-osseous support structure can be useful for providing structural support to bones subject to a surgical procedure.


The intra-osseous support structure 20 can include any useful form. In some embodiments, the intra-osseous support structure has a first major surface, a second major surface, and a perimeter edge extending between the first major surface and the second major surface. In the embodiment shown in FIG. 1, the intra-osseous support structure is generally planar as are its first and second major surfaces. The major surfaces can be devoid of any protrusions. In certain embodiments, one or both of the major surfaces can include a surface treatment such as a texture. In some embodiments (not shown), the intra-osseous support structure can include a portion generally perpendicular to a first major surface. For example, the intra-osseous support structure can include a portion that extends from a side (e.g., a medial side) and bends or curves in an upward (e.g., dorsal) or a downward (e.g. plantar) direction around and/or in apposition to a cortical surface of a bone.


In the embodiment shown in FIG. 1, the intra-osseous support structure 20 is connected to a bone portion by at least one fastener 50. In some embodiments, the intra-osseous support structure has a first portion for placement in the first bone portion 34 and a second portion for placement in the second bone portion 38, and at least one aperture (not shown in FIG. 1) to receive a respective fastener can be provided on each portion. In situ, the fastener can extend through a bone surface (e.g., a dorsal surface) and a portion of the thickness of a bone to the intra-osseously positioned support structure and be received into an aperture thereof.


As shown in FIGS. 2 and 3, some embodiments of the bone plating system 10 can include a bone plate 60. In the embodiment shown, the plate is adapted to be positioned on an outer surface of the first bone portion 34 and an outer surface of the second bone portion 38. As shown, in a bone portion having a dorsal surface and a plantar surface, the dorsal surface, and the plate placed thereon, will be in compression under load in situ. Accordingly, some embodiments of the plating system include a plate in compression and an intra-osseous support structure in tension under load in situ. Such a plating system can be useful for providing structural support to bones subject to a surgical procedure.


The bone plate 60 can include any suitable form. In some embodiments, the bone plate has a bone facing surface and a surface opposite the bone facing surface. In certain embodiments, such as the embodiment shown in FIG. 2, the bone plate 60 includes a generally planar member having generally planar surfaces. In other embodiments, such as the embodiment shown in FIG. 3, the bone plate 60 includes a curved shape (about and/or along its longitudinal axis). For example, the surface facing the bone can be concave and the opposite surface can be convex. In certain embodiments, the surface of the bone plate facing the bone may also have at least one protrusion to engage with the surface of the bone.


In embodiments of the plating system having a plate 60, the plate and intra-osseous support structure 20 can be connected to the bone and each other by the at least one fastener 50. In such embodiments, the bone plate 60 can have at least one aperture 64, 66 to receive respective fasteners 50, 52. In the embodiment shown, the bone plate has a first portion for placement on the first bone portion 34 and a second portion for placement on the second bone portion 38. At least one aperture 64, 66 for receiving a respective fastener 50, 52 can be provided on each portion. Further, the intra-osseous support structure 20 can have at least one aperture (not shown in FIGS. 2 and 3) aligned to receive the respective fastener. In situ, the fastener can extend through the bone plate, a surface of the bone, and a portion of the thickness of a bone to the intra-osseously positioned support structure and be received into the aperture thereof. After final placement, in some embodiments, the bone plate and intra-osseous support structure will be generally parallel to each other.


In some embodiments, the aperture in the intra-osseous support structure can include an attachment mechanism configured to engage a fastener. The fastener and attachment mechanism can include any structure suitable for engagement. In some embodiments, the fastener includes a screw, and the attachment mechanism includes a threaded aperture to receive and engage the screw. The attachment mechanism can include guides to facilitate alignment with the fasteners. In some embodiments, the fastener has a length that is less than the thickness of the bone. In certain embodiments, the fastener will have a length between about one-half of the thickness of the bone and the entire thickness of the bone. For example, the fastener can have a length of about two-thirds the thickness of the bone. In some embodiments, the fastener can extend through the aperture of the intra-osseous support structure (optionally engaging an attachment member thereof) and engage bone on one or both sides of the intra-osseous support structure.


Any number of fasteners and respective intra-osseous support structure apertures can be provided. In the embodiment shown in FIGS. 1-3, the intra-osseous support structure 20 includes two apertures to receive two respective fasteners 50, 52. In the embodiment shown in FIGS. 4 and 5, the intra-osseous support structure 20 includes four apertures 70, 72, 74, 76 to receive four respective fasteners 50, 52, 54, 56. In other embodiments, the intra-osseous support structure includes three apertures to receive three respective fasteners. In an embodiment of an intra-osseous support structure having a portion generally perpendicular to a first major surface, such a portion may include one or more apertures for receiving a fastener.


The fasteners and respective apertures can be provided in any orientation. In some embodiments, such as the embodiments shown in FIGS. 4, the apertures 70, 72, 74, 76 have a longitudinal axis perpendicular to a first major surface of the intra-osseous support structure 20. In other embodiments, such as the embodiment shown in FIGS. 6 and 7, the apertures 70, 72 have a longitudinal axis that intersects a first major surface of the intra-osseous support structure 20 at a skewed angle (e.g., an angle ranging from about 20 degrees to about 40 degrees from perpendicular). Further, in some embodiments, fasteners 50, 52 can extend from the bone surface and through the bone generally parallel to each other. In other embodiments, first and second fasteners can extend from the bone surface and through the bone at a skewed angle relative to each other. In embodiments of the plating system that include a plate, apertures 64, 66 can be configured such that first and second fasteners 50, 52 can extend from the bone plate 60 generally parallel to each other or at a skewed angle relative to each other.


As shown in FIGS. 8-12, some embodiments of the plating system can include an additional support that does not engage the intra-osseous support structure. Such an additional support can be useful for providing rotational stability to the plated bone portions. In the embodiment shown in FIG. 8, the additional support includes a staple 100 having an end in each bone portion 34, 38. In the example shown in FIGS. 9-10, the additional support includes a pin 110 extending across the bone portions 34, 38 at an angle (e.g., about 45 degrees). In the embodiment shown, the pin 110 includes threads 120 on its distal portion to engage bone. It also includes notches 130 on its proximal portion. The pin can be broken at a desired notch after installation. In the embodiment shown in FIGS. 11 and 12, two pins 110 are provided. As shown, the pins are inserted such that they extend across the bone portions 34, 38 in a crossing pattern, each at an angle (e.g., about 45 degrees).


The plating system can also include features useful for placing the intra-osseous support structure. As shown in FIG. 3, the intra-osseous support structure 20 can include a stop 150 on the perimeter edge that extends past the first major surface or the second major surface. In some embodiments, the stop is on a medial side of the intra-osseous support structure. In other embodiments, as shown in FIG. 13-15, a tab 170 extending beyond the perimeter edge (e.g., on a medial side) can be provided. The tab can be useful for placing the intra-osseous support structure within the bone, and, in some embodiments, can be provided with break seam such that it can be easily removed from the intra-osseous support structure after placement. FIG. 16 shows in intra-osseous support structure 20 with the tab removed.


The plating system can be used to join any bone portions. In one example, the first bone portion and the second bone portion are portions of a single bone separated by a fracture. As a further example, the first bone portion and the second bone portion are portions of a single bone separated by an osteotomy. As another example, the first bone portion and the second bone portion can be portions of two different bones separated by a joint, such as a cuneiform (e.g., medial cuneiform) and a metatarsal (e.g., first metatarsal). In the two-bone example, the intra-osseous support structure can be placed intra-osseously in the cuneiform and the metatarsal in an opening that spans the joint therebetween (e.g., tarsal-metatarsal joint). In such an embodiment, fasteners having a length less than the thickness of the cuneiform and metatarsal, respectively, can be used to connect the intra-osseous support structure to the bones. In embodiments of the plating system having a bone plate, the bone facing surface of the bone plate can be placed facing a dorsal surface of the cuneiform and a dorsal surface of the metatarsal, spanning a joint therebetween, and the fasteners can extend through apertures defined by the plate.


Embodiments of the invention also include methods of plating a bone, such as with the embodiments of bone plating systems described herein. Note the order of steps as described is only exemplary unless otherwise indicated. In some embodiments, after preparing the surgical area, the method can include the step of forming an opening in a first bone portion and a second bone portion. The opening can be formed from a side of the bone. The opening can be formed generally parallel with a longitudinal axis of the bone, or may be formed at an angle with respect to such longitudinal axis such that it crosses the longitudinal axis. The opening can be formed, e.g., by a saw, drill, mill, box chisel, router, or the like.


The method can also include the steps of placing an intra-osseous support structure in the opening and aligning it in a desired position. In some embodiments, the intra-osseous support structure can be placed generally parallel to a longitudinal axis of the bone (e.g., toward a tension side of the longitudinal axis. In other embodiments, the intra-osseous support structure can be placed at a skewed angle relative to the longitudinal axis of the bone, such that it crosses the longitudinal axis of the bone. In such embodiments, at least a portion of the intra-osseous support structure will reside on a tension side of the longitudinal axis and another portion will reside on a compression side of the longitudinal axis. The method can also include the steps of inserting a first fastener through a first bone portion and engaging the first fastener with the intra-osseous support structure, and inserting a second fastener through a second bone portion and engaging the second fastener with the intra-osseous support structure to secure the plating system to the bone. In some embodiments, the step of placing the intra-osseous support structure in the opening includes placing a stop in apposition to the first bone portion or the second bone portion. In embodiments of intra-osseous support structures having tabs, the method can also include removing the tab after placement of the support structure. Embodiments of the method can also include attaching an additional support structure to the first bone portion and the second bone portion.


In some embodiments, the method can also include the step of forming a first hole in the first bone portion from the first surface and toward an opposite surface and forming a second hole in the second bone portion from the second surface and toward an opposite surface. The first and second holes and the opening can intersect. The first and second holes can be formed, for example, with hand-driven or powered drills. In such embodiments, the fasteners can be inserted through the holes to engage an intra-osseous support structure placed within the opening.


Embodiments of the method also include placing a bone plate having a first portion in apposition to a first surface of a first bone portion and a second portion in apposition to a second surface of a second bone portion, the bone plate having a first aperture in the first portion and a second aperture in the second portion. The bone plate can be initially held in position by pins and/or protrusions. The fasteners can be inserted through apertures defined by the plate.


Thus, embodiments of the invention are disclosed. Although the present invention has been described with reference to certain disclosed embodiments, the disclosed embodiments are presented for purposes of illustration and not limitation, and other embodiments of the invention are possible. One skilled in the art will appreciate that various changes, adaptations, and modifications may be made without departing from the spirit of the invention.

Claims
  • 1. A method comprising: performing an osteotomy on a metatarsal to separate the metatarsal into a first metatarsal portion and a second metatarsal portion;adjusting an alignment of the first metatarsal portion relative to the second metatarsal portion;placing a first portion of an intra-osseous support structure in the first metatarsal portion, wherein the intra-osseous support structure comprise a plate having a first major surface, a second major surface, and perimeter edge extending between the first major surface and the second major surface, and placing the first portion of the intra-osseous support structure in the first metatarsal portion comprises positioning the first portion of the intra-osseous support structure within an intra-osseous region of the first metatarsal portion with the first major surface and the second major surface each facing cancellous bone of the first metatarsal portion; andconnecting a second portion of the intra-osseous support structure to the second metatarsal portion using at least one fastener.
  • 2. The method of claim 1, wherein connecting the second portion of the intra-osseous support structure to the second metatarsal portion comprises inserting a screw through an outer surface of the second metatarsal portion.
  • 3. The method of claim 2, further comprising forming a hole in the second metatarsal portion from the outer surface toward an opposite surface, wherein inserting the screw through the outer surface of the second metatarsal portion comprises inserting the screw into the hole.
  • 4. The method of claim 2, wherein the second portion of the intra-osseous support structure comprises a threaded aperture, and inserting the screw through the outer surface of the second metatarsal portion comprises inserting the screw into the threaded aperture.
  • 5. The method of claim 1, wherein connecting the second portion of the intra-osseous support structure to the second metatarsal portion using at least one fastener comprises inserting the at least one fastener through a thickness of the second metatarsal portion less than an entire thickness of the second metatarsal portion.
  • 6. The method of claim 5, wherein the thickness of the second metatarsal portion is within a range from one-half to two-thirds of the entire thickness of the second metatarsal portion.
  • 7. The method of claim 1, further comprising inserting a fastener into the first portion of the intra-osseous support structure.
  • 8. The method of claim 7, wherein inserting the fastener into the first portion of the intra-osseous support structure comprises inserting the fastener through an outer surface of the first metatarsal portion.
  • 9. The method of claim 8, wherein inserting the fastener through the outer surface of the first metatarsal portion comprises engaging the fastener with the intra-osseous support structure in the first metatarsal portion.
  • 10. The method of claim 7, wherein inserting the fastener into the first portion of the intra-osseous support structure comprises inserting the fastener through a thickness of the first metatarsal portion less than an entire thickness of the first metatarsal portion.
  • 11. The method of claim 7, wherein the fastener comprises a first fastener, and further comprising inserting a second fastener into the first portion of the intra-osseous support structure.
  • 12. The method of claim 1, further comprising placing the second portion of the intra-osseous support structure in the second metatarsal portion.
  • 13. The method of claim 12, further comprising forming an opening in the second metatarsal portion, wherein placing the second portion of the intra-osseous support structure in the second metatarsal portion comprises placing the second portion of the intra-osseous support structure in the opening in the second metatarsal portion.
  • 14. The method of claim 1, wherein placing the first portion of the intra-osseous support structure in the first metatarsal portion and connecting the second portion of the intra-osseous support structure to the second metatarsal portion comprises fusing the first metatarsal portion to the second metatarsal portion.
  • 15. The method of claim 1, further comprising forming an opening in the intra-osseous region of the first metatarsal portion, wherein placing the first portion of the intra-osseous support structure in the first metatarsal portion comprises placing the first portion of the intra-osseous support structure in the opening in the first metatarsal portion.
  • 16. The method of claim 1, wherein the at least one fastener comprises two fasteners, and connecting the second portion of the intra-osseous support structure to the second metatarsal portion using at least one fastener comprises connecting the second portion of the intra-osseous support structure to the second metatarsal portion using two fasteners.
  • 17. The method of claim 1, wherein the metatarsal is a first metatarsal.
  • 18. The method of claim 1, wherein the intra-osseous support structure is planar.
  • 19. The method of claim 1, wherein the intra-osseous support structure includes one portion that curves and/or extends from a side relative to an other portion.
  • 20. A method comprising: performing an osteotomy on a metatarsal to separate the metatarsal into a first metatarsal portion and a second metatarsal portion;adjusting an alignment of the first metatarsal portion relative to the second metatarsal portion; andfixating the first metatarsal portion relative to the second metatarsal portion for fusion using a structure that includes a first portion and a second portion, the first portion comprising a plate having a first major surface, a second major surface, and perimeter edge extending between the first major surface and the second major surface, the first portion being configured to be positioned intra-osseously, and the second portion including at least one aperture extending through a thickness of the structure configured to receive a screw, wherein fixating the first metatarsal portion relative to the second metatarsal portion comprises inserting the first portion of the structure within an intra-osseous region of the first metatarsal portion with the first major surface and the second major surface each facing cancellous bone of the first metatarsal portion and screwing at least one screw into the at least one aperture of the second portion of the structure and into the second metatarsal portion.
  • 21. The method of claim 20, wherein the at least one aperture comprises a threaded aperture, and screwing at least one screw into the at least one aperture of the second portion of the structure comprises screwing at least one screw into the threaded aperture of the second portion of the structure.
  • 22. The method of claim 20, wherein the at least one aperture comprises two apertures and the at least one screw comprises two screws, and screwing at least one screw into the at least one aperture of the second portion of the structure and into the second metatarsal portion comprises screwing two screws into the two apertures of the second portion of the structure and into the second metatarsal portion.
  • 23. The method of claim 20, wherein the first portion comprises at least one aperture configured to receive a screw, and further comprising screwing at least one screw into the at least one aperture of the first portion of the structure positioned within the first metatarsal portion.
  • 24. The method of claim 23, wherein the first portion comprises two apertures, and screwing at least one screw into the at least one aperture of the first portion of the structure positioned within the first metatarsal portion comprises screwing a screw into each of the two apertures of the first portion of the structure positioned within the first metatarsal portion.
  • 25. The method of claim 20, wherein the metatarsal is a first metatarsal.
RELATED APPLICATION

This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 16/877,159, filed May 18, 2020, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 15/148,774, filed May 6, 2016 and issued as U.S. Pat. No. 10,653,467, on May 19, 2020, which claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 62/157,561, filed May 6, 2015. The entire contents of each of these applications are incorporated herein by reference.

US Referenced Citations (292)
Number Name Date Kind
2133859 Hawley Oct 1938 A
2614559 Livingston Oct 1952 A
2825329 Caesar Mar 1958 A
3709218 Halloran Jan 1973 A
4159716 Borchers Jul 1979 A
4187840 Watanabe Feb 1980 A
4338927 Volkov et al. Jul 1982 A
4570624 Wu Feb 1986 A
4627425 Reese Dec 1986 A
4628919 Clyburn Dec 1986 A
4754746 Cox Jul 1988 A
4757810 Reese Jul 1988 A
4790302 Colwill et al. Dec 1988 A
4895141 Koeneman et al. Jan 1990 A
4952214 Comparetto Aug 1990 A
4959065 Arnett et al. Sep 1990 A
4978347 Ilizarov Dec 1990 A
4988349 Pennig Jan 1991 A
5021056 Hofmann et al. Jun 1991 A
5112334 Alchermes et al. May 1992 A
5207676 Canadell et al. May 1993 A
5254119 Schreiber Oct 1993 A
5312412 Whipple May 1994 A
5358504 Paley et al. Oct 1994 A
5364402 Mumme et al. Nov 1994 A
5413579 Tom Du Toit May 1995 A
5417694 Marik et al. May 1995 A
5439381 Cohen Aug 1995 A
5449360 Schreiber Sep 1995 A
5529075 Clark Jun 1996 A
5586564 Barrett et al. Dec 1996 A
5620442 Bailey et al. Apr 1997 A
H1706 Mason Jan 1998 H
5788695 Richardson Aug 1998 A
5803924 Oni et al. Sep 1998 A
5810822 Mortier Sep 1998 A
5893553 Pinkous Apr 1999 A
5935128 Carter et al. Aug 1999 A
5941877 Viegas et al. Aug 1999 A
5951556 Faccioli et al. Sep 1999 A
6030391 Brainard et al. Feb 2000 A
6162223 Orsak et al. Dec 2000 A
6171309 Huebner Jan 2001 B1
6719773 Boucher et al. Apr 2004 B1
6743233 Baldwin et al. Jun 2004 B1
7001388 Orbay et al. Feb 2006 B2
7033361 Collazo Apr 2006 B2
7037309 Weil et al. May 2006 B2
7037342 Nilsson et al. May 2006 B2
7097647 Segler et al. Aug 2006 B2
7153310 Ralph et al. Dec 2006 B2
7182766 Mogul Feb 2007 B1
7229445 Hayeck et al. Jun 2007 B2
7241298 Nemec et al. Jul 2007 B2
7377924 Raistrick et al. May 2008 B2
7465303 Riccione et al. Dec 2008 B2
7641660 Lakin et al. Jan 2010 B2
D610257 Horton Feb 2010 S
7686811 Byrd et al. Mar 2010 B2
D629900 Fisher Dec 2010 S
7972338 O'Brien Jul 2011 B2
D646389 Claypool et al. Oct 2011 S
8057478 Kuczynski et al. Nov 2011 B2
D651315 Bertoni et al. Dec 2011 S
D651316 May et al. Dec 2011 S
8080010 Schulz et al. Dec 2011 B2
8123753 Poncet Feb 2012 B2
8137406 Novak et al. Mar 2012 B2
8147530 Strnad et al. Apr 2012 B2
8167918 Strnad et al. May 2012 B2
8172848 Tomko et al. May 2012 B2
8177820 Anapliotis et al. May 2012 B2
8192441 Collazo Jun 2012 B2
8197487 Poncet et al. Jun 2012 B2
8231623 Jordan Jul 2012 B1
8231663 Kay et al. Jul 2012 B2
8246561 Agee et al. Aug 2012 B1
D666721 Wright et al. Sep 2012 S
8262664 Justin et al. Sep 2012 B2
8282644 Edwards Oct 2012 B2
8282645 Lawrence et al. Oct 2012 B2
8292966 Morton Oct 2012 B2
8313492 Wong et al. Nov 2012 B2
8323289 Re Dec 2012 B2
8337503 Lian Dec 2012 B2
8343159 Bennett Jan 2013 B2
8377105 Bscher Feb 2013 B2
8382807 Austin et al. Feb 2013 B2
8403966 Ralph et al. Mar 2013 B2
D679395 Wright et al. Apr 2013 S
8435246 Fisher et al. May 2013 B2
8475462 Thomas et al. Jul 2013 B2
8496690 Sixto et al. Jul 2013 B2
8523870 Green, II et al. Sep 2013 B2
8556946 Prandi Oct 2013 B2
D694884 Mooradian et al. Dec 2013 S
D695402 Dacosta et al. Dec 2013 S
8652142 Geissler Feb 2014 B2
D701303 Cook Mar 2014 S
8672945 Lavallee et al. Mar 2014 B2
8696716 Kartalian et al. Apr 2014 B2
D705929 Frey May 2014 S
8715363 Ratron et al. May 2014 B2
8728084 Berelsman et al. May 2014 B2
8758354 Habegger et al. Jun 2014 B2
8764763 Wong et al. Jul 2014 B2
8771279 Philippon et al. Jul 2014 B2
8784427 Fallin et al. Jul 2014 B2
8784457 Graham Jul 2014 B2
8795286 Sand et al. Aug 2014 B2
8801727 Chan et al. Aug 2014 B2
8808303 Stemniski et al. Aug 2014 B2
8828012 May et al. Sep 2014 B2
8828063 Blitz Sep 2014 B2
8858602 Weiner et al. Oct 2014 B2
8882778 Ranft Nov 2014 B2
8888824 Austin et al. Nov 2014 B2
8911482 Lee et al. Dec 2014 B2
8940026 Hilse et al. Jan 2015 B2
8998903 Price et al. Apr 2015 B2
8998904 Zeetser et al. Apr 2015 B2
9023052 Lietz et al. May 2015 B2
9044250 Olsen et al. Jun 2015 B2
9060822 Lewis Jun 2015 B2
9089376 Medoff et al. Jul 2015 B2
9101421 Blacklidge Aug 2015 B2
9107715 Blitz et al. Aug 2015 B2
9138244 Mebarak et al. Sep 2015 B2
9271769 Batsch et al. Mar 2016 B2
D765844 DaCosta Sep 2016 S
D766434 DaCosta Sep 2016 S
D766437 DaCosta Sep 2016 S
D766438 DaCosta Sep 2016 S
D766439 DaCosta Sep 2016 S
9452057 Dacosta et al. Sep 2016 B2
9642656 Kotuljac et al. May 2017 B2
9668793 Gaudin Jun 2017 B2
9750538 Soffiatti et al. Sep 2017 B2
9867642 Simon Jan 2018 B2
9980760 Dacosta et al. May 2018 B2
10226287 Langford et al. Mar 2019 B2
10238437 Simon Mar 2019 B2
10376268 Fallin et al. Aug 2019 B2
11304705 Fallin et al. Apr 2022 B2
20020099381 Maroney Jul 2002 A1
20020107519 Dixon et al. Aug 2002 A1
20020198531 Millard et al. Dec 2002 A1
20030135212 Chow Jul 2003 A1
20040010259 Keller et al. Jan 2004 A1
20040039394 Conti et al. Feb 2004 A1
20040097946 Dietzel et al. May 2004 A1
20050004676 Schon et al. Jan 2005 A1
20050075641 Singhatat et al. Apr 2005 A1
20050101961 Huebner et al. May 2005 A1
20050149042 Metzger Jul 2005 A1
20050228389 Stiernborg Oct 2005 A1
20050267482 Hyde, Jr. Dec 2005 A1
20050273112 McNamara Dec 2005 A1
20060206044 Simon Sep 2006 A1
20060217733 Plassky et al. Sep 2006 A1
20060229621 Cadmus Oct 2006 A1
20060241607 Myerson et al. Oct 2006 A1
20060241608 Myerson et al. Oct 2006 A1
20060264961 Murray-Brown Nov 2006 A1
20070123857 Deffenbaugh et al. May 2007 A1
20070233138 Figueroa et al. Oct 2007 A1
20070265634 Weinstein Nov 2007 A1
20070276383 Rayhack Nov 2007 A1
20080091197 Coughlin Apr 2008 A1
20080140081 Heavener et al. Jun 2008 A1
20080172054 Claypool et al. Jul 2008 A1
20080208252 Holmes Aug 2008 A1
20080262500 Collazo Oct 2008 A1
20080269908 Warburton Oct 2008 A1
20090036893 Kartalian et al. Feb 2009 A1
20090093849 Grabowski Apr 2009 A1
20090105767 Reiley Apr 2009 A1
20090118733 Orsak et al. May 2009 A1
20090198244 Leibel Aug 2009 A1
20090198279 Zhang et al. Aug 2009 A1
20090222047 Graham Sep 2009 A1
20090254092 Albiol Llorach Oct 2009 A1
20090254126 Orbay et al. Oct 2009 A1
20090287309 Walch et al. Nov 2009 A1
20090312802 Dasilva Dec 2009 A1
20100069910 Hasselman Mar 2010 A1
20100121334 Couture et al. May 2010 A1
20100130981 Richards May 2010 A1
20100152782 Stone et al. Jun 2010 A1
20100168799 Schumer Jul 2010 A1
20100185245 Paul et al. Jul 2010 A1
20100249779 Hotchkiss et al. Sep 2010 A1
20100256687 Neufeld Oct 2010 A1
20100324556 Tyber et al. Dec 2010 A1
20110087295 Kubiak et al. Apr 2011 A1
20110093084 Morton Apr 2011 A1
20110245835 Dodds et al. Oct 2011 A1
20110288550 Orbay et al. Nov 2011 A1
20110301648 Lofthouse et al. Dec 2011 A1
20120016426 Robinson Jan 2012 A1
20120065689 Prasad et al. Mar 2012 A1
20120078258 Lo et al. Mar 2012 A1
20120123420 Honiball May 2012 A1
20120123484 Lietz et al. May 2012 A1
20120130376 Loring et al. May 2012 A1
20120130383 Budoff May 2012 A1
20120184961 Johannaber Jul 2012 A1
20120239045 Li Sep 2012 A1
20120253350 Anthony et al. Oct 2012 A1
20120265301 Demers et al. Oct 2012 A1
20120277745 Lizee et al. Nov 2012 A1
20120303033 Weiner et al. Nov 2012 A1
20120330135 Millahn et al. Dec 2012 A1
20130012949 Fallin et al. Jan 2013 A1
20130035694 Grimm et al. Feb 2013 A1
20130085499 Lian Apr 2013 A1
20130096563 Meade et al. Apr 2013 A1
20130150900 Haddad et al. Jun 2013 A1
20130150903 Vincent Jun 2013 A1
20130158556 Jones et al. Jun 2013 A1
20130165936 Myers Jun 2013 A1
20130165938 Chow et al. Jun 2013 A1
20130172942 Lewis et al. Jul 2013 A1
20130184714 Kaneyama et al. Jul 2013 A1
20130190765 Harris et al. Jul 2013 A1
20130190766 Harris et al. Jul 2013 A1
20130204259 Zajac Aug 2013 A1
20130231668 Olsen et al. Sep 2013 A1
20130237987 Graham Sep 2013 A1
20130237989 Bonutti Sep 2013 A1
20130267956 Terrill et al. Oct 2013 A1
20130310836 Raub et al. Nov 2013 A1
20130325019 Thomas et al. Dec 2013 A1
20130325076 Palmer et al. Dec 2013 A1
20130331845 Horan et al. Dec 2013 A1
20130338785 Wong Dec 2013 A1
20140005672 Edwards et al. Jan 2014 A1
20140025127 Richter Jan 2014 A1
20140039501 Schickendantz et al. Feb 2014 A1
20140039561 Weiner et al. Feb 2014 A1
20140046387 Waizenegger Feb 2014 A1
20140074099 Vigneron et al. Mar 2014 A1
20140074101 Collazo Mar 2014 A1
20140094861 Fallin Apr 2014 A1
20140094924 Hacking et al. Apr 2014 A1
20140163563 Reynolds et al. Jun 2014 A1
20140171953 Gonzalvez et al. Jun 2014 A1
20140180342 Lowery et al. Jun 2014 A1
20140194884 Martin et al. Jul 2014 A1
20140207144 Lee et al. Jul 2014 A1
20140214037 Mayer et al. Jul 2014 A1
20140249537 Wong et al. Sep 2014 A1
20140257509 Dacosta et al. Sep 2014 A1
20140276815 Riccione Sep 2014 A1
20140276853 Long et al. Sep 2014 A1
20140277176 Buchanan et al. Sep 2014 A1
20140277214 Helenbolt et al. Sep 2014 A1
20140296995 Reiley et al. Oct 2014 A1
20140303621 Gerold et al. Oct 2014 A1
20140336658 Luna et al. Nov 2014 A1
20140350561 Dacosta et al. Nov 2014 A1
20150032168 Orsak et al. Jan 2015 A1
20150045801 Axelson, Jr. et al. Feb 2015 A1
20150045839 Dacosta et al. Feb 2015 A1
20150051650 Verstreken et al. Feb 2015 A1
20150066094 Prandi et al. Mar 2015 A1
20150112446 Melamed et al. Apr 2015 A1
20150119944 Geldwert Apr 2015 A1
20150142064 Perez et al. May 2015 A1
20150150608 Sammarco Jun 2015 A1
20150182273 Stemniski et al. Jul 2015 A1
20150223851 Hill et al. Aug 2015 A1
20150245858 Weiner et al. Sep 2015 A1
20160015426 Dayton et al. Jan 2016 A1
20160022315 Soffiatti et al. Jan 2016 A1
20160135858 Dacosta et al. May 2016 A1
20160151165 Fallin et al. Jun 2016 A1
20160175089 Fallin et al. Jun 2016 A1
20160192950 Dayton et al. Jul 2016 A1
20160199076 Fallin et al. Jul 2016 A1
20160213384 Fallin et al. Jul 2016 A1
20160235414 Hatch et al. Aug 2016 A1
20160242791 Fallin et al. Aug 2016 A1
20160256204 Patel et al. Sep 2016 A1
20160354127 Lundquist et al. Dec 2016 A1
20170000533 Fallin et al. Jan 2017 A1
20170042599 Bays et al. Feb 2017 A1
20170079669 Bays et al. Mar 2017 A1
20180132868 Dacosta et al. May 2018 A1
20180344334 Kim et al. Dec 2018 A1
20180344371 Monk et al. Dec 2018 A1
20190357950 Bernstein et al. Nov 2019 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (83)
Number Date Country
2009227957 Jul 2014 AU
2491824 Sep 2005 CA
2854997 May 2013 CA
695846 Sep 2006 CH
2930668 Aug 2007 CN
201558162 Aug 2010 CN
201572172 Sep 2010 CN
201586060 Sep 2010 CN
201912210 Aug 2011 CN
202801773 Mar 2013 CN
103462675 Dec 2013 CN
103505276 Jan 2014 CN
203458450 Mar 2014 CN
102860860 May 2014 CN
203576647 May 2014 CN
104490460 Apr 2015 CN
104510523 Apr 2015 CN
104523327 Apr 2015 CN
104546102 Apr 2015 CN
204379413 Jun 2015 CN
204410951 Jun 2015 CN
204428143 Jul 2015 CN
204428144 Jul 2015 CN
204428145 Jul 2015 CN
204446081 Jul 2015 CN
685206 Sep 2000 EP
1897509 Jul 2009 EP
2124772 Dec 2009 EP
2124832 Aug 2012 EP
2632349 Sep 2013 EP
2665428 Nov 2013 EP
2742878 Jun 2014 EP
2750617 Jul 2014 EP
2849684 Mar 2015 EP
3023068 May 2016 EP
2362616 Mar 1978 FR
2764183 Nov 1999 FR
3030221 Jun 2016 FR
2154143 Sep 1985 GB
2154144 Sep 1985 GB
200903719 Jun 2009 IN
200904479 May 2010 IN
140DELNP2012 Feb 2013 IN
2004KOLNP2013 Nov 2013 IN
4134243 Aug 2008 JP
4162380 Oct 2008 JP
2011092405 May 2011 JP
2011523889 Aug 2011 JP
4796943 Oct 2011 JP
5466647 Apr 2014 JP
2014511207 May 2014 JP
2014521384 Aug 2014 JP
5628875 Nov 2014 JP
100904142 Jun 2009 KR
756 Nov 2014 MD
2098036 Dec 1997 RU
2195892 Jan 2003 RU
2320287 Mar 2008 RU
2321366 Apr 2008 RU
2321369 Apr 2008 RU
2346663 Feb 2009 RU
2412662 Feb 2011 RU
1333328 Aug 1987 SU
0166022 Sep 2001 WO
2008051064 May 2008 WO
2009029798 Mar 2009 WO
2009032101 Mar 2009 WO
2011037885 Mar 2011 WO
2012029008 Mar 2012 WO
2013090392 Jun 2013 WO
2013134387 Sep 2013 WO
2013169475 Nov 2013 WO
2014020561 Feb 2014 WO
2014022055 Feb 2014 WO
2014035991 Mar 2014 WO
2014085882 Jun 2014 WO
2014147099 Sep 2014 WO
2014152219 Sep 2014 WO
2014152535 Sep 2014 WO
2014177783 Nov 2014 WO
2014200017 Dec 2014 WO
2015105880 Jul 2015 WO
2015127515 Sep 2015 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (139)
Entry
Defendant Fusion Orthopedics LLC's Invalidity Contentions, No. CV-22-00490-PHX-SRB, US District Court for the District of Arizona, Aug. 27, 2022, 41 pages.
Prior Art Publications, Exhibit A of Defendant Fusion Orthopedics LLC's Invalidity Contentions, No. CV-22-00490-PHX-SRB, US District Court for the District of Arizona, Aug. 27, 2022, 3 pages.
Claim Chart for Fishco, “Making the Lapidus Easy,” The Podiatry Institute (Apr. 2014), Exhibit B1 of Defendant Fusion Orthopedics LLC's Invalidity Contentions, No. CV-22-00490-PHX-SRB, US District Court for the District of Arizona, Aug. 27, 2022, 97 pages.
Claim Chart for Fishco, “A Straightforward Guide to the Lapidus Bunionectomy,” HMP Global (Sep. 6, 2013), Exhibit B2 of Defendant Fusion Orthopedics LLC's Invalidity Contentions, No. CV-22-00490-PHX-SRB, US District Court for the District of Arizona, Aug. 27, 2022, 67 pages.
Claim Chart for Groves, “Functional Position Joint Sectioning: Pre-Load Method for Lapidus Arthrodesis,” Update 2015: Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Podiatry Institute, Chpt. 6, pp. 23-29 (Apr. 2015), Exhibit B3 of Defendant Fusion Orthopedics LLC's Invalidity Contentions, No. CV-22-00490-PHX-SRB, US District Court for the District of Arizona, Aug. 27, 2022, 151 pages.
Claim Chart for Mote, “First Metatarsal-Cuneiform Arthrodesis for the Treatment of First Ray Pathology: A Technical Guide,” The Journal Foot & Ankle Surgery (Sep. 1, 2009), Exhibit B5 of Defendant Fusion Orthopedics LLC's Invalidity Contentions, No. CV-22-00490-PHX-SRB, US District Court for the District of Arizona, Aug. 27, 2022, 21 pages.
Claim Chart for U.S. Pat. No. 10,376,268 to Fallin et al., entitled “Indexed Tri-Planar Osteotomy Guide and Method,” Issued Aug. 13, 2019, Exhibit B6 of Defendant Fusion Orthopedics LLC's Invalidity Contentions, No. CV-22-00490-PHX-SRB, US District Court for the District of Arizona, Aug. 27, 2022, 155 pages.
Claim Chart for U.S. Pat. No. 8,282,645 to Lawrence et al., entitled “Metatarsal Bone Implant Cutting Guide,” issued Jan. 18, 2010, Exhibit B7 of Defendant Fusion Orthopedics LLC's Invalidity Contentions, No. CV-22-00490-PHX-SRB, US District Court for the District of Arizona, Aug. 27, 2022, 76 pages.
Claim Chart for U.S. Pat. No. 9,452,057 to Dacosta et al., entitled “Bone Implants and Cutting Apparatuses and Methods,” issued Apr. 8, 2011, Exhibit B8 of Defendant Fusion Orthopedics LLC's Invalidity Contentions, No. CV-22-00490-PHX-SRB, US District Court for the District of Arizona, Aug. 27, 2022, 110 pages.
Obviousness Chart, Exhibit C of Defendant Fusion Orthopedics LLC's Invalidity Contentions, No. CV-22-00490-PHX-SRB, US District Court for the District of Arizona, Aug. 27, 2022, 153 pages.
“Foot and Ankle Instrument Set,” Smith & Nephew, 2013, 2 pages.
“Lapidus Pearls: Gaining Joint Exposure to Decrease Non-Union,” Youtube, Retrieved online from <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-jqJyE7pj-Y>, dated Nov. 2, 2009, 3 pages.
“Reconstructive Surgery of the Foot & Ankle,” The Podiatry Institute, Update 2015, Conference Program, May 2015, 28 pages.
“Speed Continuous Active Compression Implant,” BioMedical Enterprises, Inc., A120-029 Rev. 3, 2013, 4 pages.
“Visionaire: Patient Matched Cutting Blocks Surgical Procedure,” Smith & Nephew, Inc., 2009, 2 pages.
Arthrex, “Comprehensive Foot System,” Retrieved online from <https://www.arthrex.com/resources/ animation/8U3iaPvY6kO8bwFAwZF50Q/comprehensive-foot-system?referringTeam=foot_and_ankle>, dated Aug. 27, 2013, 3 pages.
Baravarian, “Why the Lapidus Procedure is Ideal for Bunions,” Podiatry Today, Retrieved online from <https://www.hmpgloballearhmpgloballe.com/site/podipodi/article/5542>, dated May 2006, 8 pages.
Bauer et al., “Offset-V Osteotomy of the First Metatarsal Shaft in Hallux Abducto Valgus, ” McGlamry's Comprehensive Textbook of Foot and Ankle Surgery, Fourth Edition, vol. 1, Chapter 29, 2013, 26 pages.
Cottom, “Fixation of the Lapidus Arthrodesis with a Plantar Interfragmentary Screw and Medial Low Profile Locking Plate,” The Journal of Foot & Ankle Surgery, vol. 51, 2012, pp. 517-522.
Coughlin, “Fixation of the Lapidus Arthrodesis with a Plantar Interfragmentary Screw and Medial Low Profile Locking Plate, ”Orthopaedics and Traumatology, vol. 7, 1999, pp. 133-143.
Dayton et al., “Observed Changes in Radiographic Measurements of the First Ray after Frontal Plane Rotation of the First Metatarsal in a Cadaveric Foot Model,” The Journal of Foot & Ankle Surgery, vol. 53, 2014, pp. 274-278.
Dayton et al., “Relationship of Frontal Plane Rotation of First Metatarsal to Proximal Articular Set Angle and Hallux Alignment in Patients Undergoing Tarsometatarsal Arthrodesis for Hallux Abducto Valgus: A Case Series and Critical Review of the Literature,” The Journal of Foot & Ankle Surgery, 2013, Article in Press, Mar. 1, 2013, 7 pages.
DiDomenico et al., “Lapidus Bunionectomy: First Metatarsal-Cuneiform Arthrodesis,” McGlamry's Comprehensive Textbook of Foot and Ankle Surgery, Fourth Edition, vol. 1, Chapter 31, 2013, 24 pages.
Fallin et al., US Provisional Application Entitled Indexed Tri-Planar Osteotomy Guide and Method, U.S. Appl. No. 62/118,378, filed Feb. 19, 2015, 62 pages.
Fishco, “A Straightforward Guide To The Lapidus Bunionectomy, ”Podiatry Today, Retrieved online from <https://www.hmpgloballearningnetwork.com/site/podiatry/blogged/straightforward-guide-lapidus-bunionectomy>, dated Sep. 6, 2013, 5 pages.
Fishco, “Making the Lapidus Easy,” The Podiatry Institute, Update 2014, Chapter 14, 2014, pp. 91-93.
Fleming et al., “Results of Modified Lapidus Arthrodesis Procedure Using Medial Eminence as an Interpositional Autograft,” The Journal of Foot & Ankle Surgery, vol. 50, 2011, pp. 272-275.
Fuhrmann, “Arthrodesis of the First Tarsometatarsal Joint for Correction of the Advanced Splayfoot Accompanied by a Hallux Valgus,” Operative Orthopadie und Traumatologie, No. 2, 2005, pp. 195-210.
Gerard et al., “The Modified Lapidus Procedure,” Orthopedics, vol. 31, No. 3, Mar. 2008, 7 pages.
Giannoudis et al., “Hallux Valgus Correction,” Practical Procedures in Elective Orthopaedic Surgery, Pelvis and Lower Extremity, Chapter 38, 2012, 22 pages.
Greiner, “The Jargon of Pedal Movements,” Foot & Ankle International, vol. 28, No. 1, Jan. 2007, pp. 109-125.
Groves, “Functional Position Joint Sectioning: Pre-Load Method for Lapidus Arthrodesis,” The Podiatry Institute, Update 2015, Chapter 6, 2015, pp. 23-29.
Hardy et al., “Observations on Hallux Valgus,” The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, vol. 33B, No. 3, Aug. 1951, pp. 376-391.
Holmes, Jr., “Correction of the Intermetatarsal Angle Component of Hallux Valgus Using Fiberwire-Attached Endo-buttons,” Revista Internacional de Ciencias Podologicas, vol. 6, No. 2, 2012, pp. 73-79.
Integra, “Integra Large Qwix Positioning and Fixation Screw, Surgical Technique,” 2012, 16 pages.
Kilmartin et al., “Combined rotation scarf and Akin osteotomies for hallux valgus: a patient focused 9 year follow up of 50 patients,” Journal of Foot and Ankle Research, vol. 3, No. 2, 2010, 12 pages.
Lee et al., “Technique Tip: Lateral Soft-Tissue Release for Correction of Hallux Valgus Through a Medial Incision Using A Dorsal Flap Over the First Metatarsal,” Foot & Ankle International, vol. 28, No. 8, Aug. 2007, pp. 949-951.
Mote et al., “First Metatarsal-Cuneiform Arthrodesis for the Treatment of First Ray Pathology: A Technical Guide,” JFAS Techniques Guide, vol. 48, No. 5, Sep./Oct. 2009, pp. 593-601.
Myerson, “Cuneiform-Metatarsal Arthrodesis,” The Foot and Ankle, Chapter 9, 1997, pp. 107-117.
Sammarco, “Surgical Strategies: Mau Osteotomy for Correction of Moderate and Severe Hallux Valgus Deformity,” Foot & Ankle International, vol. 28, No. 7, Jul. 2007, pp. 857-864.
Schon et al., “Cuneiform-Metatarsal Arthrodesis for Hallux Valgus, ”The Foot and Ankle, Second Edition, Chapter 8, 2002, pp. 99-117.
Sokoloff, “Lapidus Procedure,” Textbook of Bunion Surgery, Chapter 15, 1981, pp. 277-287.
Stamatis et al., “Mini Locking Plate as ”Medial Buttress“ for Oblique Osteotomy for Hallux Valgus,” Foot & Ankle International, vol. 31, No. 10, Oct. 2010, pp. 920-922.
Stewart, “Use for BME Speed Nitinol Staple Fixation for the Lapidus Procedure,” date unknown, 1 page.
Wukich et al., “Hypermobility of the First Tarsometatarsal Joint,” Foot and Ankle Clinics, vol. 10, No. 1, Mar. 2005, pp. 157-166.
Dayton et al., “Biwinged Excision for Round Pedal Lesions,” The Journal of Foot and Ankle Surgery, vol. 35, No. 3, 1996, pp. 244-249.
Dayton et al., “Medial Incision Approach to the First Metatarsophalangeal Joint,” The Journal of Foot and Ankle Surgery, vol. 40, No. 6, Nov./Dec. 2001, pp. 414-417.
Dayton et al., “Reduction of the Intermetatarsal Angle after First Metatarsophalangeal Joint Arthrodesis in Patients with Moderate and Severe Metatarsus Primus Adductus,” The Journal of Foot and Ankle Surgery, vol. 41, No. 5, Sep./Oct. 2002, pp. 316-319.
Dayton et al., “Use of the Z Osteotomy for Tailor Bunionectomy,” The Journal of Foot and Ankle Surgery, vol. 42, No. 3, May/Jun. 2003, pp. 167-169.
Dayton et al., “Early Weightbearing After First Metatarsophalangeal Joint Arthrodesis: A Retrospective Observational Case Analysis, ” The Journal of Foot and Ankle Surgery, vol. 43, No. 3, May/Jun. 2004, pp. 156-159.
Dayton et al., “Dorsal Suspension Stitch: An Alternative Stabilization After Flexor Tenotomy for Flexible Hammer Digit Syndrome,” The Journal of Foot and Ankle Surgery, vol. 48, No. 5, Sep./Oct. 2009, pp. 602-605.
Dayton et al., “The Extended Knee Hemilithotomy Position for Gastrocnemius Recession,” The Journal of Foot and Ankle Surgery, vol. 49, 2010, pp. 214-216.
Wienke et al., “Bone Stimulation For Nonunions: What the Evidence Reveals,” Podiatry Today, vol. 24, No. 9, Sep. 2011, pp. 52-57.
Dayton et al., “Hallux Varus as Complication of Foot Compartment Syndrome,” The Journal of Foot and Ankle Surgery, vol. 50, 2011, pp. 504-506.
Dayton et al., “Measurement of Mid-Calcaneal Length on Plain Radiographs: Reliability of a New Method,” Foot and Ankle Specialist, vol. 4, No. 5, Oct. 2011, pp. 280-283.
Dayton et al., “A User-Friendly Method of Pin Site Management for External Fixators,” Foot and Ankle Specialist, Sep. 16, 2011, 4 pages.
Dayton et al., “Effectiveness of a Locking Plate in Preserving Midcalcaneal Length and Positional Outcome after Evans Calcaneal Osteotomy: A Retrospective Pilot Study,” The Journal of Foot and Ankle Surgery, vol. 52, 2013, pp. 710-713.
Dayton et al., “Does Postoperative Showering or Bathing of a Surgical Site Increase the Incidence of Infection? A Systematic Review of the Literature,” The Journal of Foot and Ankle Surgery, vol. 52, 2013, pp. 612-614.
Dayton et al., “Technique for Minimally Invasive Reduction of Calcaneal Fractures Using Small Bilateral External Fixation,” The Journal of Foot and Ankle Surgery, Article in Press, 2014, 7 pages.
Dayton et al., “Clarification of the Anatomic Definition of the Bunion Deformity,” The Journal of Foot and Ankle Surgery, vol. 53, 2014, pp. 160-163.
Dayton et al., “Observed Changes in Radiographic Measurements of the First Ray after Frontal Plane Rotation of the First Metatarsal in a Cadaveric Foot Model,” The Journal of Foot and Ankle Surgery, Article in Press, 2014, 5 pages.
Dayton et al., “Observed Changes in First Metatarsal and Medial Cuneiform Positions after First Metatarsophalangeal Joint Arthrodesis,” The Journal of Foot and Ankle Surgery, vol. 53, 2014, pp. 32-35.
Dayton et al., “Reduction of the Intermetatarsal Angle after First Metatarsal Phalangeal Joint Arthrodesis: A Systematic Review,” The Journal of Foot and Ankle Surgery, Article in Press, 2014, 4 pages.
Feilmeier et al., “Reduction of Intermetatarsal Angle after First Metatarsophalangeal Joint Arthrodesis in Patients with Hallux Valgus,” The Journal of Foot and Ankle Surgery, vol. 53, 2014, pp. 29-31.
Dayton et al., “Principles of Management of Growth Plate Fractures in the Foot and Ankle,” Clinics in Podiatric Medicine and Surgery, Pediatric Foot Deformities, Oct. 2013, 17 pages.
Dayton et al., “Observed Changes in Radiographic Measurements of the First Ray after Frontal and Transverse Plane Rotation of the Hallux: Does the Hallux Drive the Metatarsal in a Bunion Deformity?,” The Journal of Foot and Ankle Surgery, Article in Press, 2014, 4 pages.
Rodriguez et al., “Ilizarov method of fixation for the management of pilon and distal tibial fractures in the compromised diabetic patient: A technique guide,” The Foot and Ankle Journal Online, vol. 7, No. 2, 2014, 9 pages.
Feilmeier et al., “Incidence of Surgical Site Infection in the Foot and Ankle with Early Exposure and Showering of Surgical Sites: A Prospective Observation,” The Journal of Foot and Ankle Surgery, vol. 53, 2014, pp. 173-175.
Catanese et al., “Measuring Sesamoid Position in Hallux Valgus: When Is the Sesamoid Axial View Necessary,” Foot and Ankle Specialist, 2014, 3 pages.
Dayton et al., “Comparison of Complications for Internal and External Fixation for Charcot Reconstruction: A Systematic Review,” The Journal of Foot and Ankle Surgery, Article in Press, 2015, 4 pages.
Dayton et al., “A new triplanar paradigm for bunion management,” Lower Extremity Review, Apr. 2015, 9 pages.
Dayton et al., “American College of Foot and Ankle Surgeons' Clinical Consensus Statement: Perioperative Prophylactic Antibiotic Use in Clean Elective Foot Surgery,” The Journal of Foot and Ankle Surgery, Article in Press, 2015, 7 pages.
Dayton et al., “Complications of Metatarsal Suture Techniques for Bunion Correction: A Systematic Review of the Literature,” The Journal of Foot and Ankle Surgery, Article in Press, 2015, 3 pages.
DeCarbo et al., “The Weil Osteotomy: A Refresher,” Techniques in Foot and Ankle Surgery, vol. 13, No. 4, Dec. 2014, pp. 191-198.
DeCarbo et al., “Resurfacing Interpositional Arthroplasty for Degenerative Joint Diseas of the First Metatarsalphalangeal Joint,” Podiatry Management, Jan. 2013, pp. 137-142.
DeCarbo et al., “Locking Plates: Do They Prevent Complications?,” Podiatry Today, Apr. 2014, 7 pages.
Easley et al., “Current Concepts Review: Hallux Valgus Part II: Operative Treatment,” Foot and Ankle International, vol. 28, No. 6, Jun. 2007, pp. 748-758.
Kim et lal., “A Multicenter Retrospective Review of Outcomes for Arthrodesis, Hemi-Metallic Joint Implant, and Resectional Arthroplasty in the Surgical Treatment of End-Stage Hallux Rigidus,” The Journal of Foot and Ankle Surgery, vol. 51, 2012, pp. 50-56.
Easley et al., “Current Concepts Review: Hallux Valgus Part I: Pathomechanics, Clinical Assessment, and Nonoperative Management,” Foot and Ankle International, vol. 28, No. 5, May 2007, pp. 654-659.
Sandhu et al., “Digital Arthrodesis With a One-Piece Memory Nitinol Intramedullary Fixation Device: A Retrospective Review,” Foot and Ankle Specialist, vol. 6, No. 5, Oct. 2013, pp. 364-366.
Weber et al., “Use of the First Ray Splay Test to Assess Transverse Plane Instability Before First Metatarsocuneiform Fusion,” The Journal of Foot and Ankle Surgery, vol. 45, No. 4, Jul./Aug. 2006, pp. 278-282.
Smith et al., “Opening Wedge Osteotomies for Correction of Hallux Valgus: A Review of Wedge Plate Fixation,” Foot and Ankle Specialist, vol. 2, No. 6, Dec. 2009, pp. 277-282.
Easley et al., “What is the Best Treatment for Hallux Valgus?,” Evidence-Based Orthopaedics - The Best Answers to Clinical Questions, Chapter 73, 2009, pp. 479-491.
Shurnas et al., “Proximal Metatarsal Opening Wedge Osteotomy,” Operative Techniques in Foot and Ankle Surgery, Section I, Chapter 13, 2011, pp. 73-78.
Coetzee et al., “Revision Hallux Valgus Correction,” Operative Techniques in Foot and Ankle Surgery, Section I, Chapter 15, 2011, pp. 84-96.
Le et al., “Tarsometatarsal Arthrodesis,” Operative Techniques in Foot and Ankle Surgery, Section II, Chapter 40, 2011, pp. 281-285.
Collan et al., “The biomechanics of the first metatarsal bone in hallux valgus: A preliminary study utilizing a weight bearing extremity CT,” Foot and Ankle Surgery, vol. 19, 2013, pp. 155-161.
Eustace et al., “Hallux valgus, first metatarsal pronation and collapse of the medial longitudinal arch—a radiological correlation,” Skeletal Radiology, vol. 23, 1994, pp. 191-194.
Mizuno et al., “Detorsion Osteotomy of the First Metatarsal Bone in Hallux Valgus,” Japanese Orthopaedic Association, Tokyo, 1956; 30:813-819.
Okuda et al., “The Shape of the Lateral Edge of the First Metatarsal Head as a Risk Factor for Recurrence of Hallux Valgus,” The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, vol. 89, 2007, pp. 2163-2172.
Okuda et al., “Proximal Metatarsal Osteotomy for Hallux Valgus: Comparison of Outcome for Moderate and Severe Deformities,” Foot and Ankle International, vol. 29, No. 7, Jul. 2008, pp. 664-670.
D'Amico et al., “Motion of the First Ray: Clarification Through Investigation,” Journal of the American Podiatry Association, vol. 69, No. 1, Jan. 1979, pp. 17-23.
Groves, “Operative Report,” St. Tammany Parish Hospital, Date of Procedure, Mar. 26, 2014, 2 pages.
Claim Chart for Groves Public Use (Mar. 26, 2014), Exhibit B4 of Defendant Fusion Orthopedics LLC's Invalidity Contentions, No. CV-22-00490-PHX-SRB, US District Court for the District of Arizona, Aug. 27, 2022, 161 pages.
Albano et al., “Biomechanical Study of Transcortical or Transtrabecular Bone Fixation of Patellar Tendon Graft wih Bioabsorbable Pins in ACL Reconstruction in Sheep,” Revista Brasileira de Ortopedia (Rev Bras Ortop.) vol. 47, No. 1, 2012, pp. 43-49.
Anderson et al., “Uncemented STAR Total Ankle Prostheses,” The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, vol. 86(1, Suppl 2), Sep. 2004, pp. 103-111, (Abstract Only).
Dayton et al., “Is Our Current Paradigm for Evaluation and Management of the Bunion Deformity Flawed? A Discussion of Procedure Philosophy Relative to Anatomy,” The Journal of Foot and Ankle Surgery, vol. 54, 2015, pp. 102-111.
Dayton et al., “Observed Changes in Radiographic Measurements of the First Ray after Frontal and Transverse Plane Rotation of the Hallux: Does the Hallux Drive the Metatarsal in a Bunion Deformity?,” The Journal of Foot and Ankle Surgery, vol. 53, 2014, pp. 584-587.
Dayton et al., “Relationship Of Frontal Plane Rotation Of First Metatarsal To Proximal Articular Set Angle And Hallux Alignment In Patients Undergoing Tarsometatarsal Arthrodesis For Hallux Abducto Valgus: A Case Series And Critical Review Of The Literature,” The Journal of Foot and Ankle Surgery, vol. 52, No. 3, May/Jun. 2013, pp. 348-354.
Dayton et al., “Quantitative Analysis of the Degree of Frontal Rotation Required to Anatomically Align the First Metatarsal Phalangeal Joint During Modified Tarsal-Metatarsal Arthrodesis Without Capsular Balancing,” The Journal of Foot and Ankle Surgery, 2015, pp. 1-6.
De Geer et al., “A New Measure of Tibial Sesamoid Position in Hallux Valgus in Relation to the Coronal Rotation of the First Metatarsal in CT Scans,” Foot and Ankle International, Mar. 26, 2015, 9 pages.
Didomenico et al., “Correction of Frontal Plane Rotation of Sesamoid Apparatus during the Lapidus Procedure: A Novel Approach,” The Journal of Foot and Ankle Surgery, vol. 53, 2014, pp. 248-251.
Dobbe et al. “Patient-Tailored Plate For Bone Fixation And Accurate 3D Positioning In Corrective Osteotomy,” Medical and Biological Engineering and Computing, vol. 51, No. 1-2, Feb. 2013, pp. 19-27, (Abstract Only).
EBI Extra Small Rail Fixator, Biomet Trauma, retrieved Dec. 19, 2014, from the Internet: <http://footandanklefixation.com/product/biomet-trauma-ebi-extra-small-rail-fixator>, 7 pages.
Garthwait, “Accu-Cut System Facilitates Enhanced Precision,” Podiatry Today, vol. 18, No. 6, Jun. 2005, 6 pages.
Gonzalez Del Pino et al., “Variable Angle Locking Intercarpal Fusion System for Four-Corner Arthrodesis: Indications and Surgical Technique,” Journal of Wrist Surgery, vol. 1, No. 1, Aug. 2012, pp. 73-78.
Grondal et al., “A Guide Plate for Accurate Positioning of First Metatarsophalangeal Joint during Fusion,” Operative Orthopädie Und Traumatologie, vol. 16, No. 2, 2004, pp. 167-178 (Abstract Only).
“Hat-Trick Lesser Toe Repair System,” Smith & Nephew, Brochure, Aug. 2014, 12 pages.
“Hoffmann II Compact External Fixation System,” Stryker, Brochure, Literature No. 5075-1-500, 2006, 12 pages.
“Hoffmann II Micro Lengthener,” Stryker, Operative Technique, Literature No. 5075-2-002, 2008, 12 pages.
“Hoffmann Small System External Fixator Orthopedic Instruments,” Stryker, retrieved Dec. 19, 2014, from the Internet: <http://www.alibaba.com/product-detail/Stryker-Hoffmann-Small-System-External-Fixator_1438850129.html>, 3 pages.
Kim et al., “A New Measure of Tibial Sesamoid Position in Hallux Valgus in Relation to the Coronal Rotation of the First Metatarsal in CT Scans,” Foot and Ankle International, vol. 36, No. 8, 2015, pp. 944-952.
“Lag Screw Target Bow,” Stryker Leibinger GmbH & Co. KG, Germany 2004, 8 pages.
MAC (Multi Axial Correction) Fixation System, Biomet Trauma, retrieved Dec. 19, 2014, from the Internet: <http://footandanklefixation.com/product/biomet-trauma-mac-multi-axial-correction-fixation-system>, 7 pages.
Michelangelo Bunion System, Surgical Technique, Instratek Incorporated, publication date unknown, 4 pages.
Mini Joint Distractor, Arthrex, retrieved Dec. 19, 2014, from the Internet: <http://www.arthrex.com/foot-ankle/mini-joint-distractor/products>, 2 pages.
MiniRail System, Small Bone Innovations, Surgical Technique, 2010, 24 pages.
Modular Rail System: External Fixator, Smith & Nephew, Surgical Technique, 2013, 44 pages.
Monnich et al., “A Hand Guided Robotic Planning System for Laser Osteotomy in Surgery,” World Congress on Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering vol. 25/6: Surgery, Nimimal Invasive Interventions, Endoscopy and Image Guided Therapy, Sep. 7-12, 2009, pp. 59-62, (Abstract Only).
Moore et al., “Effect Of Ankle Flexion Angle On Axial Alignment Of Total Ankle Replacement,” Foot and Ankle International, vol. 31, No. 12, Dec. 2010, pp. 1093-1098, (Abstract Only).
Mortier et al., “Axial Rotation of the First Metatarsal Head in a Normal Population and Hallux Valgus Patients,” Orthopaedics and Traumatology: Surgery and Research, vol. 98, 2012, pp. 677-683.
Okuda et al., “Postoperative Incomplete Reduction of the Sesamoids as a Risk Factor for Recurrence of Hallux Valgus,” The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, vol. 91-A, No. 1, Jul. 2009, pp. 1637-1645.
Rx-Fix Mini Rail External Fixator, Wright Medical Technology, Brochure, Aug. 15, 2014, 2 pages.
Scanlan et al. “Technique Tip: Subtalar Joint Fusion Using a Parallel Guide and Double Screw Fixation,” The Journal of Foot and Ankle Surgery, vol. 49, Issue 3, May-Jun. 2010, pp. 305-309, (Abstract Only).
Scranton Jr. et al., “Anatomic Variations in the First Ray: Part I. Anatomic Aspects Related to Bunion Surgery,” Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, vol. 151, Sep. 1980, pp. 244-255.
Siddiqui et al. “Fixation Of Metatarsal Fracture With Bone Plate In A Dromedary Heifer,” Open Veterinary Journal, vol. 3, No. 1, 2013, pp. 17-20.
Sidekick Stealth Rearfoot Fixator, Wright Medical Technology, Surgical Technique, Dec. 2, 2013, 20 pages.
Simpson et al., “Computer-Assisted Distraction Ostegogenesis By Ilizarov's Method,” International Journal of Medical Robots and Computer Assisted Surgery, vol. 4, No. 4, Dec. 2008, pp. 310-320, (Abstract Only).
Small Bone External Fixation System, Acumed, Surgical Technique, Effective date Sep. 2014, 8 pages.
Stableloc External Fixation System, Acumed, Product Overview, Effective date Sep. 2015, 4 pages.
Stahl et al., “Derotation Of Post-Traumatic Femoral Deformities By Closed Intramedullary Sawing,” Injury, vol. 37, No. 2, Feb. 2006, pp. 145-151, (Abstract Only).
Talbot et al.,“ Assessing Sesamoid Subluxation: How Good is the AP Radiograph?,” Foot and Ankle International, vol. 19, No. 8, Aug. 1998, pp. 547-554.
TempFix Spanning the Ankle Joint Half Pin and Transfixing Pin Techniques, Biomet Orthopedics, Surgical Technique, 2012, 16 pages.
Weber et al., “A Simple System For Navigation Of Bone Alignment Osteotomies Of The Tibia,” International Congress Series, vol. 1268, Jan. 2004, pp. 608-613, (Abstract Only).
Whipple et al., “Zimmer Herbert Whipple Bone Screw System: Surgical Techniques for Fixation of Scaphoid and Other Small Bone Fractures,” Zimmer, 2003, 59 pages.
Yakacki et al. “Compression Forces of Internal and External Ankle Fixation Devices with Simulated Bone Resorption,” Foot and Ankle International, vol. 31, No. 1, Jan. 2010, pp. 76-85, (Abstract Only).
Yasuda et al., “Proximal Supination Osteotomy of the First Metatarsal for Hallux Valgus,” Foot and Ankle International, vol. 36, No. 6, Jun. 2015, pp. 696-704.
Chang et al., “Lapidus Arthrodesis: A Different Perspective,” Journal of the American Podiatric Medical Association, vol. 84, No. 6, Jun. 1994, pp. 281-288.
Horton et al., “Deformity Correction and Arthrodesis of the Midfoot with a Medial Plate,” Foot & Ankle, vol. 14, No. 9, Nov./Dec. 1993, pp. 493-499.
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20220409250 A1 Dec 2022 US
Provisional Applications (1)
Number Date Country
62157561 May 2015 US
Continuations (2)
Number Date Country
Parent 16877159 May 2020 US
Child 17897321 US
Parent 15148774 May 2016 US
Child 16877159 US