1. Field of the Invention
The present invention relates to methods and devices for closing an opening inside of a body, and in some embodiments, to closing, blocking or filtering the ostium of a left atrial appendage, or a septal defect, such as a patent foramen ovale.
2. Description of the Related Art
Embolic stroke is the nation's third leading killer for adults, and is a major cause of disability. There are over 700,000 strokes per year in the United States alone. Approximately 100,000 of these are hemorrhagic and 600,000 are ischemic (either due to vessel narrowing or to embolism). A large number of strokes are believed to be caused or related to a defect in the heart called a patent foramen ovale, or to thrombus formation due to an irregularity in the heart beat called atrial fibrillation. Although there are pharmacological therapies for stroke prevention such as oral or systemic administration of warfarin or the like, these have been found inadequate due to serious side effects of the medications and lack of patient compliance in taking the medication.
Patent Foramen Ovale
About 50,000 of the ischemic strokes are believed to be caused by a patent foramen ovale. In addition, the risk of recurrent stroke is higher in patients whose strokes are caused by a patent foramen ovale.
The heart is generally divided into four chambers: the upper two are the left and right atria and the lower two are the left and right ventricles. The atria are separated from each other by a muscular wall, the interatrial septum, and the ventricles by the interventricular septum.
Either congenitally or by acquisition, abnormal openings, holes or shunts can occur between the chambers of the heart or the great vessels (interatrial and interventricular septal defects or patent ductus arteriosus and aortico-pulmonary window respectively), causing shunting of blood through the opening. During fetal life, most of the circulating blood is shunted away from the lungs to the peripheral tissues through specialized vessels and foramens that are open (“patent”). In most people these specialized structures quickly close after birth, but sometimes they fail to close. A patent foramen ovale is a condition wherein an abnormal opening is present in the septal wall between the two atria of the heart. An atrial septal defect is a condition wherein a hole is present in the septal wall between the two atria of the heart.
In contrast to other septal defects which tend to have an opening with a generally longitudinal axis approximately normal to the septum, a patent foramen ovale tends to behave like a flap valve. Accordingly, the axis of the patent foramen ovale tends to be at an angle, and almost parallel to the septal wall. The patent foramen ovale is a virtual tunnel, long and wide, but not very tall. It is normally closed because the roof and floor of the tunnel are in contact, but it can open when the pressure in the right side of the heart becomes elevated relative to the pressure in the left side of the heart, such as while coughing.
Studies have shown that adults with strokes of unknown origin (cryptogenic strokes) have about twice the rate of patent foramen ovales than the normal population. Although there is a correlation between strokes and patent foramen ovales, it is currently unknown why this correlation exists. Many people theorize that blood clots and plaque that have formed in the peripheral venous circulation (in the legs for example) break off and travel to the heart. Normally, the clots and plaque get delivered to the lungs where they are trapped and usually cause no harm to the patient. Patients with a patent foramen ovale, however, have a potential opening through which the clots or plaque can pass from the venous circulation and into the arterial circulation. The clots or plaque can then travel to the brain or other tissues to cause a thromboembolic event like a stroke. The clots may pass to the arterial side when there is an increase in the pressure in the right atrium. Then the clots travel through the left side of the heart, to the aorta, and then to the brain via the carotid arteries where they cause a stroke.
Recent studies also suggest a higher incidence of patent foramen ovale in patients suffering from migraine headache, and particularly those who experience aura in association with their migraines, than in the general population. It is theorized that closure of PFO will substantially improve or even cure migraine in these patients, and trials underway suggest that for some patients their migraine was resolved subsequent to closure of their PFO. It has been suggested that migraine could be related to passage through a PFO of gas microemboli, thrombi, or vasoactive chemicals, whereas normally these substances pass through the lungs where they are filtered out or otherwise deactivated.
Previously, patent foramen ovale have required relatively extensive surgical techniques for correction. To date the most common method of closing intracardiac shunts, such as a patent foramen ovale, entails the relatively drastic technique of open-heart surgery, requiring opening the chest or sternum and diverting the blood from the heart with the use of a cardiopulmonary bypass. The heart is then opened, the defect is sewn shut by direct suturing with or without a patch of synthetic material (usually of Dacron, Teflon, silk, nylon or pericardium), and then the heart is closed. The patient is then taken off the cardiopulmonary bypass machine, and then the chest is closed.
In place of direct suturing, closure of a patent foramen ovale by means of a mechanical prosthesis has also been disclosed. A number of devices designed for closure of interatrial septal defects have been used to correct patent foramen ovale. Although these devices have been known to effectively close other septal defects, there are few occlusion devices developed specifically for closing patent foramen ovale.
Atrial Fibrillation
The most common cause of embolic stroke emanating from the heart is thrombus formation due to atrial fibrillation. Approximately 80,000 strokes per year are attributable to atrial fibrillation. Atrial fibrillation is an arrhythmia of the heart that results in a rapid and chaotic heartbeat that produces lower cardiac output and irregular and turbulent blood flow in the vascular system. There are over five million people worldwide with atrial fibrillation, with about four hundred thousand new cases reported each year. Atrial fibrillation is associated with a 500 percent greater risk of stroke due to the condition. A patient with atrial fibrillation typically has a significantly decreased quality of life due, in part, to the fear of a stroke, and the pharmaceutical regimen necessary to reduce that risk.
For patients who develop atrial thrombus from atrial fibrillation, the clot normally occurs in the left atrial appendage (LAA) of the heart. The LAA is a cavity which looks like a small finger or windsock and which is connected to the lateral wall of the left atrium between the mitral valve and the root of the left pulmonary vein. The LAA normally contracts with the rest of the left atrium during a normal heart cycle, thus keeping blood from becoming stagnant therein, but often fails to contract with any vigor in patients experiencing atrial fibrillation due to the discoordinate electrical signals associated with AF. As a result, thrombus formation is predisposed to form in the stagnant blood within the LAA.
Blackshear and Odell have reported that of the 1288 patients with non-rheumatic atrial fibrillation involved in their study, 221 (17%) had thrombus detected in the left atrium of the heart. Blackshear J L & Odell J A., Appendage Obliteration to Reduce Stroke in Cardiac Surgical Patients With Atrial Fibrillation, Ann. Thorac. Surg., 1996.61(2):755-59. Of the patients with atrial thrombus, 201 (91%) had the atrial thrombus located within the left atrial appendage. The foregoing suggests that the elimination or containment of thrombus formed within the LAA of patients with atrial fibrillation would significantly reduce the incidence of stroke in those patients.
As discussed above, pharmacological therapies for stroke prevention such as oral or systemic administration of warfarin or the like have been inadequate due to serious side effects of the medications and lack of patient compliance in taking the medication. Invasive surgical or thorascopic techniques have been used to obliterate the LAA, however, many patients are not suitable candidates for such surgical procedures due to a compromised condition or having previously undergone cardiac surgery. In addition, the perceived risks of even a thorascopic surgical procedure often outweigh the potential benefits. See Blackshear & Odell; see also Lindsay B D, Obliteration of the Left Atrial Appendage: A Concept Worth Testing, Ann. Thorac. Surg., 1996.61(2):515.
Despite the various efforts in the prior art, there remains a need for a minimally invasive method and associated devices for reducing the risk of thrombus formation in the left atrial appendage.
In one embodiment, a method of preventing ingress of material into the left atrium of a heart includes: providing a delivery sheath having a sheath proximal end, a sheath distal end, and a lumen extending therethrough, to the right atrium of the heart; advancing the sheath distal end through an opening between the right atrium and the left atrium; providing an expandable cage, having a proximal end, a distal end, a plurality of supports extending therebetween, a first membrane provided at the proximal end, and a second membrane provided at the distal end, the expandable cage having a collapsed configuration to be received within the lumen of the delivery sheath, and an expanded configuration for deployment within the heart; delivering the expandable cage to the left atrium of the heart through the delivery sheath; and expanding the expandable cage within the left atrium, the expandable cage when expanded positioning the second membrane at the ostium of the left atrial appendage, wherein the second membrane prevents passage of embolic material from the left atrial appendage into the left atrium, and positioning the first membrane at an opening between the left atrium and a right atrium of the heart, where the first membrane substantially prevents passage of blood between the atria.
The opening can be a natural opening, and the opening can be formed by piercing the atrial septum. In one embodiment, the opening is a patent foramen ovale or a septal defect.
The cage can be self expanding, and can be expanded by retracting the delivery sheath proximally. In one embodiment, the delivering step includes pulling the delivery sheath proximally with respect to the expandable cage prior to said expanding step. In another embodiment, the delivering step includes pushing the expandable cage past the sheath distal end prior to said expanding step. In another embodiment, delivering the expandable cage includes positioning the cage distal of the distal end prior to said expanding step.
The method can further include verifying the position of the expandable cage within the left atrium, wherein said verifying is performed prior to said expanding step, repositioning said cage within the left atrium, and/or retrieving said cage from the left atrium.
In another embodiment of the present invention a method of preventing ingress of material to a chamber of a heart includes: providing an expandable cage to a chamber of a heart, wherein said chamber has at least two openings, and wherein said expandable cage comprises a proximal end, a distal end, a plurality of supports extending therebetween, and at least one membrane, the expandable cage having a collapsed configuration for delivery to the heart, and an expanded configuration for deployment within the heart; and expanding said expandable cage within the chamber of the heart, wherein said at least one membrane is positioned at one of said at least two openings of the chamber to prevent ingress of material into the chamber.
One of said at least two openings can be an ostium to a left atrial appendage, a patent foramen ovale, or a septal defect. The membrane can filter blood from a left atrial appendage and/or substantially prevent blood flow from a right atrium into a left atrium the heart.
In another embodiment, an expandable cage for preventing ingress of material to a chamber of a heart includes: a frame including a proximal end, a distal end, and a plurality of supports extending therebetween, wherein said cage has a collapsed configuration for delivery to a chamber of the heart, and an expanded configuration for deployment within the heart; and at least one membrane provided at at least one of said proximal and said distal ends, wherein a length between said proximal and distal ends when at least partially expanded generally approximates the distance between an ostium of a left atrial appendage and a septum of the heart.
The at least one membrane can include a proximal membrane provided at said proximal end and a distal membrane provided at said distal end. The at least one membrane can have a diameter corresponding to the dimensions of a patent foramen ovale or a diameter corresponding to the dimensions of an ostium of a left atrial appendage. In another embodiment, the proximal end includes supports that extend proximally, distally, and proximally from an apex to a proximal hub.
In yet another embodiment of the present invention, a system for preventing ingress of material to a chamber of a heart includes and expandable cage; and a transseptal sheath for delivering the expandable cage to the chamber.
Some embodiments of the present invention are described primarily in the context of a left atrial appendage, septal defect or patent foramen ovale closure device or procedure; however, the devices and methods herein are readily applicable to a wider variety of closure or attachment procedures, and all such applications are contemplated by the present inventors. Vascular procedures such as patent ductus arteriosis closure, isolation or repair of aneurysms, or occlusion of vessels, ducts, or conduits, may also be accomplished using the devices as described herein. A variety of other tissue openings, lumens, hollow organs and surgically created passageways may be closed in accordance with the preferred embodiments. Closures and repairs described herein may be accomplished using catheter based interventional methods or minimally invasive surgical methods. Adaptation of the devices and methods disclosed herein to accomplish procedures such as the foregoing will be apparent to those of skill in the art in view of the disclosure herein.
The Heart
Oxygenated blood returns to the heart 100 from the lungs via the pulmonary veins 210, which direct the blood into the left atrium 104. As the heart 100 pumps, the oxygenated blood passes from the left atrium 104 into the left ventricle 102 via the mitral valve 212. Blood exits the left ventricle 102 via the aortic valve 214 and aorta 110, which distributes the oxygenated blood to the body via the circulatory system.
A septum 216 separates the left side of the heart 100 from its right side, and prevents blood from flowing directly therebetween. In particular, an interatrial septum (not shown) separates the right atrium 114 from the left atrium 104, and an interventricular septum separates the right ventricle 112 from the left ventricle 102. The interatrial septum and interventricular septum are sometimes referred to as the atrial septum and ventricular septum, respectively.
In some clinical situations there is a hole or defect in the septum 216 of the heart 100, which allows blood to flow directly from the right atrium 114 to the left atrium 104, or from the right ventricle 112 to the left ventricle 102. It is often clinically desirable to seal or close off such holes or defects. In addition, in patients that suffer from atrial fibrillation, it is often desirable to seal, close off, block, or filter the opening between the left atrium 104 and the left atrial appendage 106 of the heart 100.
Intracardiac Cages
Embodiments of structures suitable for blocking an opening to a chamber of the heart are illustrated in
The cage 300 may have any suitable configuration adapted to span the distance between the septum 216 and the atrial appendage 106 and position the membranes 500A and 500B across an opening in the septum 216 and the ostium of the atrial appendage 106. Although two membranes 500A, 500B are illustrated on the cage 300, it will be appreciated that only one membrane may be used, if desired, to provide a barrier to either a septal opening or the atrial appendage, or more than two membranes may be used to prevent ingress of material from other openings into the chamber. In another embodiment, the cage 300 does not include a membrane. Instead, the cage itself acts as a barrier to substantially prevent ingress of particles, fluids, or both into the left atrium.
The cage 300 is preferably expandable within the left atrium to provide sufficient force to hold the membranes 500A and 500B against the respective openings. In one embodiment, the cage 300 is self-expanding, such that in the configuration shown in
In one embodiment, any of a variety of active expansion devices are used to expand the cage 300 within a patient. For example, telescoping tubes can be used to expand the cage 300. An inner tube can be positioned in contact with the distal end of a cage 300 and an outer tube can be positioned in contact with the proximal end of the cage 300. By moving the outer tube distally with respect to the inner tube, distal force can be applied to the proximal end of the cage 300, thereby causing the cage 300 to change its shape from reduced-diameter configuration to an expanded-diameter configuration.
The amount of cage 300 expansion can be controlled by any of a variety of mechanisms, such a lock placed on either or both of the telescoping tubes to fix its position when the tubes achieve a predetermined or desired separation. In addition, a ratchet can be used to fix the separation between the telescoping tubes. Telescoping tubes and other embodiments of cage 300 expansion devices are described in U.S. application Ser. No. 10/426,107, filed Jul. 30, 2002, which is incorporated by reference herein. One of skill in the art will appreciate that although the expansion devices and structures described in the aforementioned application are configured for an implantable device for placement within a left atrial appendage, these teachings can readily be applied to a cage as described herein for placement within an atrium. Similarly, the devices and methods described in the other patents and applications incorporated by reference hereinbelow can also be adapted to the expandable cage described herein. The cage 300 in one embodiment has a length between the proximal and distal ends of about 2 cm to about 10 cm, more preferably about 5 cm to about 7 cm, to correspond to the size of the left atrium 104.
An intracardiac cage 300 in accordance with one embodiment of the present invention is illustrated in
In another embodiment illustrated in
The precise number and configuration of supports 306 can be modified depending upon the desired physical properties of the cage 300, as will be apparent to those of skill in the art in view of the disclosure herein without departing from the present invention. The cage 300 can also include an occluding member (not shown) and any of a variety of stabilizing members, such as those described in U.S. application Ser. No. 09/435,562, filed Nov. 8, 1999, and U.S. application Ser. No. 10/033,371, filed Oct. 19, 2001, published as U.S. Publication No. 2002/0111647, which are incorporated by reference. The supports 306 are generally sufficiently spaced apart from one another to allow blood to flow between them.
In another embodiment, the proximal hub 308, distal hub 310, or both, and the associated supports 306 can be shaped as shown in
Each support 306 can include a proximal spoke portion 312, a distal spoke portion 314, and an apex 316. Each of the proximal spoke portion 312, distal spoke portion 314 and apex 316 can be a region on an integral support 306, such as a continuous rib or frame member which extends in a generally curved configuration as illustrated, with a concavity facing towards the longitudinal axis of the cage 300. A distinct point or hinge at apex 316 can or can not be provided.
The cage 300 may be reduced in diameter to a reduced or collapsed configuration for transluminal delivery to the heart, as will be described in greater detail below. Once delivered to the heart, the cage 300 diameter can be expanded to an expanded configuration for placement and securement at the desired location within the heart 100. In one embodiment, the cage 300 may be self-expanding, with supports made of a superelastic material such as nickel titanium alloy or nitinol. To collapse the cage 300, the supports 306 may be extended axially to a generally linear configuration, with the distance between the proximal and distal hubs 308, 310 increasing. In another embodiment, the cage 300 may be collapsed to its reduced configuration while maintaining the distance between the proximal and distal hubs 308, 310 substantially constant, such as by folding the supports 306 upon themselves or otherwise collapsing the supports 306 while holding the relative position of the proximal and distal ends 302, 304. Even more preferably, the supports 306 may not only collapse upon themselves, but the distance between the proximal and distal hubs 308, 310 may decrease when the cage 300 is moved to its collapsed configuration, such as by pulling the distal end 304 toward the proximal end 302, or pushing the proximal end 302 toward the distal end 304, or both. Then, when the cage 300 expands, it expands not only radially outwardly, but also axially to increase the distance between the proximal and distal hubs 308, 310. Such an embodiment may facilitate placement of the cage 300 within a chamber of the heart 100, as described below.
Some of the supports 306, and in some cases each support 306, can be provided with one or two or more anchors or barbs 318 to help secure or anchor the cage 300 at the desired location within the heart 100. In the configuration illustrated in
The term “barb” is a broad term intended to have its ordinary meaning. The term “barb” can include any of a variety of anchors, locks, adhesives, clips, clamps, coils, springs, and/or hooks known to those of skill in the art. The barb can be any device that holds, secures, fixes, locks, and/or maintains the position of an implantable device, such as an intracardiac cage 300, either partially, substantially, or totally, within the heart. In some embodiments, the barbs are projections that do not come to a point, such as a catch and release hook. Barbs may have traumatic or atraumatic tips, or a combination thereof. In addition, the barbs can engage, penetrate, pierce, pinch, press, and/or grasp the tissue at the inside wall of the heart.
In some embodiments, the cage 300 can be deployed or recovered using a delivery system, as described in greater detail below. Cage 300 recovery can be facilitated by the anchor or barb design. For example, the anchors or barbs can pronate such that they do not ‘ catch’ on a delivery catheter during cage recovery or implant delivery. In one embodiment barbs move into the planes of the supports during withdrawal of the cage into a catheter, thereby preventing the barbs from contacting the distal end of the catheter and impeding withdrawal of the cage into the catheter. In another embodiment, the barbs move inward to the planes of the supports during withdrawal of the cage 300 into a catheter. Implantable devices including pronating anchors and barbs are disclosed in U.S. application Ser. No. 10/838,710, filed May 4, 2004, which is incorporated by reference herein.
In some embodiments the barbs allow tissue ingrowth, and in other embodiments they prevent tissue ingrowth. In one embodiment, the support 306 has a center portion that is fractureable, which permits the cage 300 to separate into two portions. Cage fracture may be desirable for hearts which become enlarged, or which contract in overall size, over time. In such embodiments, the barbs preferably promote tissue ingrowth, which allows permanent anchoring of each cage 300 portion within the heart. In one such embodiment, the barbs 318 are located only at the proximal and distal ends 302, 304 of the cage 300, and not in the center portion 313. One embodiment of a fracturable support 306 is illustrated in
Anchoring of the cage 300 relative to the atrial wall may be desirable to prevent cardiac tissue irritation, erosion, or damage; to prevent irritation or disruption of conduction pathways in the heart tissue, to orient supports in relation to blood flow pathways such as the pulmonary vein or the mitral valve.
The cage 300 illustrated in
Alternatively, each of the components of the cage 300 may be separately formed and attached together such as through soldering, brazing, heat bonding, adhesives, and other fastening techniques which are known in the art. Another method of manufacturing the cage 300 is to laser cut a slot pattern on a flat sheet of appropriate material, such as a flexible metal or polymer. The flat sheet may thereafter be rolled about an axis and opposing edges bonded together to form a tubular structure. In another embodiment, the cage 300 is manufactured by braiding a structure, such as wire filament, into a cylindrical configuration and crimping the braided ends into radiopaque tubes. Such devices and methods are described in U.S. Pat. No. 6,325,815, which is incorporated by reference herein.
The apex portion 316, which can also carry a barb 318 may be advanced from a low profile, compressed, or reduced-diameter orientation (not shown) in which each of the supports 306 extend generally parallel to the longitudinal axis, to an implanted, expanded or enlarged-diameter orientation as illustrated, in which the apex 316 and its barb 318 are positioned radially outwardly from the longitudinal axis. The support 306 may be biased towards the enlarged orientation, or may be advanced to the enlarged orientation under positive force following positioning within a desired tubular anatomical structure, in any of a variety of manners.
A cross-sectional view of another embodiment of an intracardiac cage 300 is shown in
The membrane can include implant grade filter or barrier materials such as polyester, polyurethane, polyethylene, expanded polytetrafluoroethylene (ePTFE), polypropylene mesh, metal mesh, including Nitinol, stainless steel, and other metals, and other filter or barrier materials as are commonly known in the art. The membrane can include an impervious film, and in some cases can have openings to enhance fluid flow therethrough. The openings can be created by any of a variety of methods, including laser drilling, piercing, etc. The membrane can be a woven, non-woven, knitted, cast, spun, electrospun, laminated, blow-molded, or otherwise fabricated material.
The membrane can be attached to the supports 306 by heat-fusing, with or without an intermediate adhesive layer, by encircling supports and attaching the membrane to itself using any of a variety of techniques, such as heat fusing, solvent welding, ultrasonic welding, by using adhesives, by mechanical interlock, or by other means as are known in the art.
The membrane can be configured to provide a impervious barrier function to some or all of any substances desired, such as substances thought to be a significant causative factor in stroke or migraine, including but not limited to particles, emboli, thromboemboli, gas bubbles, vasoactive chemicals, neuromediators, or other substances normally filtered by or otherwise deactivated by the lungs. The membrane can be configured to filter some or all of such substances. The membrane can be configured to de-activate or remove from the bloodstream some or all of any substances thought to be a significant causative factor in stroke or migraine, including but not limited to those listed above. One or more membranes may be applied to the supports 306, and each membrane applied may have different barrier, filter, or de-activation characteristics, and any single membrane may have regions with differing barrier, filter, or de-activation characteristics.
As shown in
Another embodiment of an intracardiac cage 300 is illustrated in
The intracardiac cage 300 can be any of a variety of shapes, including spherical, elliptical, hexagonal, octagonal, or any other symmetric or asymmetric shape. The cage 300 can have an s-shaped, c-shaped, and/or a u-shaped portion. The cage 300 can act like a spring and spring into its expanded shape when released from the delivery system, as described in greater detail below. The cage supports can be oriented substantially axially relative to a line from hub to hub or can have a spiral orientation relative to this line.
Delivery Systems
The intracardiac cage 300 as described above may be delivered to the left atrium 104 of a patient by any suitable method. In one embodiment, a transseptal sheath, such as described below, may be delivered into the left atrium 104 through the septum 216 from the right atrium 114, with a self-expanding cage 300 collapsed within the transseptal sheath at its distal end. The transseptal sheath may pass through or pierce any suitable portion of the septum 216, including the fossa ovalis, a septal defect, the patent foramen ovale, or any other portion, including a healthy portion, of the septum 216. A distal end of the sheath may be positioned at the ostium of or within the left atrial appendage 106. A push rod may be inserted into the transseptal sheath to engage the proximal end of the cage 300. In one embodiment, the push rod may releasably engage the cage 300, such as with a threaded connection, simple contact, or other mechanism. With the distal end of the transseptal sheath, and correspondingly, the distal end 304 of the cage 300, at the ostium of or within the left atrial appendage 106, the transseptal sheath may be retracted proximally, while maintaining the push rod against the cage 300. As the transseptal sheath is retracted, the cage 300 is exposed and self-expands to engage against the walls of the left atrium 104. In one embodiment, the transseptal sheath is withdrawn until the tip of the sheath is barely (e.g., 1-2 mm) within the left atrium, and thereafter the push rod is advanced to fully deploy the cage. At this point the transseptal sheath is fully withdrawn from the septum until the tip of the sheath is within the right atrium. In one embodiment, the push rod is hollow to allow radiopaque contrast dye injections and associated physician evaluation before, during, and after cage deployment.
In one embodiment, the push rod is hollow, and a core extends through the push rod and releasably engages the distal end 304 of the cage 300. When the cage 300 is collapsed in the transseptal sheath, the distance between the proximal and distal ends 302, 304 of the cage 300 may be reduced relative to its expanded configuration by relative movement of the core and the push rod. Then, when the transseptal sheath is retracted from the cage 300, the core and the push rod may be moved relatively to cause the proximal and distal ends 302, 304 of the cage 300 to move away from each other, relieving stress in the cage 300 and allowing it to expand not only radially but also axially. This causes the cage 300 to expand outwardly against the septum 216 and the ostium of the left atrial appendage 106, providing a holding force to hold the membranes 500A, 500B in position.
A delivery system 800 for delivering an intracardiac cage 300, particularly the cage 300 shown in
The deployment catheter 806 preferably comprises a deployment handle 810 and a multi-lumen shaft 812. As shown in
An axially moveable core 808 preferably extends from the deployment handle 810 through the core lumen 822 of the catheter 806 and couples the intracardiac cage 300 (not shown) to the delivery system 800 with a coupling (not shown). The coupling may be any coupling known to those of skill in the art, including a threaded portion, a lock, an interface, a grip, slider assembly 406, or any other coupling. A control line (not shown), which may be a pull wire, preferably extends through the control line lumen 824 and preferably couples the proximal hub 308 of the intracardiac cage 300 to the deployment handle control knob 814, allowing for cage 300 expansion and collapse. The control line preferably extends around a portion of the axially movable core 808 near the proximal hub 308 of the cage 300, and is coupled to the cage 300 by a crosspin 404, as shown in greater detail in
As shown in
As shown in
The axially moveable core 808 preferably is disposed within the deployment catheter 806 such that the flexible core section 836 may be linearly co-located with the flexible catheter section 828 at a distal portion 848 of the delivery system 800 during appropriate times during a procedure, as shown in
In one embodiment, shown in
Referring to
Referring back to
The peel-away sheath 802 preferably is provided over a portion of the recapture sheath 804, between the Touhy-Borst valve 864 and recapture flares 860. The peel-away sheath 802 preferably is used to introduce the delivery system 800 into a transseptal sheath, as described in greater detail below. As shown in
A loading collar 882 (shown in
System Assembly
To assemble the delivery system 800, the axially movable core 808 and control line 888 preferably are fed into the multi-lumen shaft 812 of the deployment catheter 806. The multi-lumen shaft 812 preferably is then coupled with components of the deployment handle 810 and the injection ports 818, 820. The peel-away sheath 802 and the loading collar 882 preferably are slid onto the recapture sheath 804, and the recapture sheath 804 is slid onto the deployment catheter 806. The cage 300 preferably is then loaded on an end of the axially movable core 808 and coupled with the control line 888. In one embodiment, the cage 300 is loaded on an end of the axially movable core 808 by screwing the axially movable core 808 into the slider nut 890 of the slider assembly 406. The control knob 814 and outer casing of the deployment handle 810 preferably are then coupled with the delivery system 800.
Transseptal Sheath
The delivery system 800 preferably is used in connection with a transseptal sheath 900, as illustrated in
Crossing the Interatrial Septum
In some cases, a hole or defect exists in the atrial septum 216 of the heart 100. The hole or defect may be used in certain embodiments of the present invention to deliver an intracardiac cage 300 to the left atrium 104 of the heart 100. In such embodiments, a delivery system 800 is directed through the hole or defect from the right atrium 114 to the left atrium 104. In other cases, it is clinically indicated to pierce the septum 216 of the heart 100 with a suitable device, such as a dilator, as will be discussed in greater detail below with respect to
In one embodiment, a guidewire (not shown) preferably is used to access the superior vena cava 202 through groin access. A transseptal sheath 900 preferably is advanced over the guidewire and into the superior vena cava 202. The guidewire preferably is removed and replaced with a transseptal needle (not shown). The transseptal sheath 900 preferably is retracted inferiorly so that the bend 902 in the transseptal sheath 900 directs the distal tip of the transseptal sheath 900 toward the fossa ovalis. The needle preferably is advanced to puncture the fossa ovalis. The transseptal sheath 900 preferably is advanced to establish access to the left atrium 104 and the needle preferably is retracted. Further details or disclosure are provided in copending U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/435,562, filed Nov. 8, 1999 and Ser. No. 10/033,371, filed Oct. 19, 2002, published as U.S. Publication No. 2002/0111647, the entireties of which are hereby incorporated by reference.
Dilator
The tubular body 916 may be manufactured in accordance with any of a variety of known techniques, for manufacturing catheters adapted to reach the coronary arteries or chambers of the heart. For example, the tubular body 916 may be manufactured as an extrusion of appropriate biocompatible polymeric materials such as high/low density polyethylene (HDPE/LDPE), polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE), nylons, and a variety of others which are known in the art. Blended materials may also be used, such as HDPE (e.g., HDPE/LDPE ratios such as 50%:50%, 60%:40% and others) with from about 5% to about 25%, and, in one embodiment, about 20% BaSO.sub.4 for lubricity and radiopacity. Alternatively, at least a portion or all of the length of tubular body 916 may comprise a spring coil, solid walled hypodermic needle tubing (e.g., stainless steel, NiTi alloys) or braided reinforced wall as is understood in the catheter and guidewire arts.
For most applications, the tubular body 916 is provided with an approximately circular cross sectional configuration having an outside diameter within the range of from about 0.020″ to about 0.300″. In accordance with one embodiment of the invention, the tubular body 916 has an outside diameter of about 0.160″ throughout its length. Other lengths and diameters may be readily utilized, depending upon the desired profile and performance characteristics.
The proximal end 912 is provided with a manifold 918, having one or more access ports as in known in the art. In the illustrated embodiment, manifold 918 is provided with a core wire port 920 which may also or alternatively function as a guidewire port in an over the wire embodiment. An injection port 922 may also be provided, for injecting a contrast media, such as to confirm that the distal end 914 has traversed the intraatrial septum 216. Additional access ports may be provided as needed, depending upon the functional capabilities of the catheter. The manifold 918 may be injection molded from any of a variety of medical grade plastics or formed in accordance with other techniques known in the art.
The flexible body 916 is provided with a preset bend 924, for assisting in biasing the distal end 914 against the intraatrial septum 216 as is understood in the art. The bend 924 preferably has a radius within the range of from about 0.5 cm to about 5 cm and, in one embodiment, about 2.5 cm. The bend 924 is centered on a point which is within the range of from about 1 cm to about 10 cm proximally from distal end 914. In one embodiment, the bend 924 is centered at approximately 6 cm proximally from distal end 914. The bend 924 can be defined by a proximal transition where it meets the substantially linear proximal portion of the dilator 910, and a distal transition where it meets the substantially linear distal portion of the dilator 910. The angular deflection of the bend 924 is generally within the range of from about 30.degree. to about 80.degree. and, in one embodiment, is about 50.degree.
The bend 924 may be provided in accordance with any of a variety of techniques. For example, when the tubular body 916 includes a hypotube or other metal tubing, it may be bent such as around a forming mandrel in excess of the elastic limit of the hypotube. Alternatively, an injection molded catheter body may be heat set in a predetermined bend, such as with removable flexible mandrels extending through any interior lumen to maintain patency of the lumen around the bend 924. Other techniques will be known to those of skill in the art. Alternatively, the bend 924 may be formed during or after placement of the catheter in the heart. This may be accomplished by providing the dilator 910 with any of a variety of steering mechanisms, which allow a distal portion 914 of the dilator 910 to be inclined away from the axis of the normal bias of the dilator 910. For example, one or more axially moveable pull wires may extend throughout the length of the dilator 910. Proximal traction on a pull wire that is secured at the distal end 914 of the dilator 910 will cause a lateral defection of the dilator 910.
The dilator 910 is additionally provided with a tissue piercing structure 926 such as a needle 928. The needle 928 preferably includes a tubular structure such as a stainless steel hypotube having a sharpened distal end 930. The sharpened distal end 930 of the needle 928 is axially moveable and advanceable through an aperture 932 in the distal end 914 of the tubular body 916.
In one embodiment, the needle 928 has an axial length of from about 1 cm to about 5 cm, an inside diameter of about 0.022 inches and an outside diameter of about 0.032 inches. Any of a variety of other dimensions for needle 928 may also be used depending upon the desired performance and overall catheter dimensions. The needle 928 is coupled to a control element such as core wire 934 which axially moveably extends throughout the length of tubular body 916. The proximal end of the core wire 934 in the illustrated embodiment extends proximally from the core wire port 920. The needle 928 is preferably axially moveable between a first position in which the tip 930 is contained within the distal end 914 of the tubular body 916 and a distal position in which the tip 930 of the needle 928 is exposed beyond the distal end of the tubular body 916, such as for piercing the fossa ovalis. Distal advancement of the proximal end of the core wire 934 will advance the needle 928 from the first position to the second position as will be appreciated in view of the disclosure herein. In addition, the needle 928 and core wire 934 may be removed entirely from the dilator 910, except when desired to pierce the septum. Other mechanisms known to those of skill in the art, such as spring-loaded needles with trigger releases, may be used to move the needle 928 from the first position to the second position.
Once the piercing structure 926 has pierced the fossa ovalis or other structure, and the distal end 914 of the dilator 910 is advanced through the opening formed by the piercing structure, the piercing structure 926 may be proximally retracted and removed from the dilator 910, thereby leaving the central lumen of the dilator 910 fully available for subsequent therapeutic or diagnostic devices or materials.
Preferably, the distal end 914 of the dilator 910 is provided with a tapered frustro conical surface 936. This allows the tubular body 916 to function as a dilator, thereby permitting the tapered surface 936 to enlarge the opening formed by needle 928 while minimizing “tenting” of the fossa ovalis during a transseptal access procedure.
Piercing the Interatrial Septum
In accordance with embodiments of the present invention as illustrated in
One access point is along the right femoral vein, although access from the left femoral vein is also possible. Access may also be achieved through a puncture in any of a variety of other veins of suitable internal diameter and the present invention is not limited in this regard.
A conventional spring tipped guidewire 940 is thereafter advanced through the needle into the vein and the needle is subsequently removed. The dilator 910 is positioned within a sheath such as a 14 French introducer sheath. Subsequently, the sheath and inner dilator 910, in combination with the guidewire 940, are advanced through the femoral vein to the right atrium 114.
The guidewire 940 is then distally advanced to access the superior vena cava 202, as shown in
When the sheath 900 and dilator 910 are in the superior vena cava 202 and the guidewire 940 has been removed, the transseptal needle 928 is advanced through the central lumen of the dilator 910 and sheath 900. The transseptal needle 928 is advanced (possibly with a stylet in place) to a point that the stylet tip is just inside the distal tip of the sheath 900 and dilator 910, a position previously noted by the operator, and the stylet is withdrawn from the transseptal needle 928.
The remaining combination of the sheath 900 with the dilator 910 having the transseptal needle 928 therein, is then drawn proximally from the superior vena cava 202 while the preset curves 902, 924 at the distal region of sheath 900 and dilator 910 cause the tip of the sheath-dilator-transseptal needle combination to “drag” along the wall of the right atrium 114 and septum 216, as shown in
The tip of the dilator 910 is then positioned against the septum 216 by distal advancement through the sheath 900. The tip is then dragged along the septum 216 by proximal traction on the dilator 910 until the tip pops onto the fossa ovalis 942. Various methods and devices known to those of skill in the art may be utilized to help identify the location of the fossa ovalis. 942. One such method and device is described in U.S. application Ser. No. 10/100,270, filed, Mar. 15, 2002, published as U.S. Publication No. 2002/0169377, which is incorporated by reference herein.
The physician is normally assisted during placement, as in the entire procedure, by fluoroscopy or other visualization techniques. To assist in such visualization, the distal tip of sheath 900 and the distal tip of dilator 910 may be provided with a radiopaque marker. In addition, some physicians find it desirable to infuse a radiopaque dye through the transseptal needle 928 at various stages of the procedure to assist in visualization, particularly following the transseptal puncture.
After the tip of the sheath-dilator-transseptal needle combination has been placed in the desired location against the fossa ovalis 942, the transseptal needle 928 is abruptly advanced to accomplish a quick puncture, as illustrated in
Alternatively, if the septum 216 includes a hole or defect, such as a patent foramen ovale, the method of the embodiment illustrated in
The transseptal sheath 900 and dilator 910 are positioned adjacent to the patent foramen ovale 944 and its tissue piercing structure 926 is advanced distally through the septum secundum 946 and septum primum 948 by actuating an actuator, such as a control on the dilator 910 manifold 918. In some embodiments, the tissue piercing structure 926 may be advanced across the septa manually. In other embodiments, tissue piercing structure 926 may be advanced across the septa using a spring loaded handle. Crossing the septa quickly using a spring loaded handle may facilitate crossing of the septum primum 948.
After placing the transseptal needle tip 930 within the left atrium 104, the tip 936 of the dilator 910 is advanced through the septum 216 and into the left atrium 104, as shown in
After preparing a transseptal sheath 900 for left atrial 104 access, the size and morphology of the left atrium 104 can be determined by injecting contrast media through the sheath 900 and into the left atrium 104.
In one embodiment, the system and method preferably allows for selection and preparation of a deployment system 800. The delivery system 800 preferably comprises an intracardiac cage 300 of an appropriate size for placement in a patient. Initially, the cage 300 preferably is in an expanded configuration, with its axially moveable core 808 engaging a slider assembly 406, as described above. A recapture sheath 804 preferably is positioned so it covers and supports the flexible segment 850 of the delivery system 800, wherein the flexible catheter section 828 of deployment catheter 806 and flexible core section 836 of axially moveable core 808 are aligned. The Touhy-Borst valve 864 preferably is tightened over the deployment catheter 806 to prevent relative movement between recapture sheath 804 and deployment catheter 806. The loading collar 882 and peel-away sheath 802 preferably are positioned so they are at the base of the recapture flares 860, proximal thereto.
The delivery system 800 preferably is loaded by rotating the control knob 814 counterclockwise until the cage 300 is fully collapsed. Preferably, at least a portion of the control line 888 is coupled with the control knob 814 such that rotation of the control knob 814 in the counterclockwise direction retracts at least a portion of the control line 888. Retraction of the control line 888 preferably places tension on the proximal hub 308 of the cage 300 because a portion of the control line 888 preferably is coupled with the proximal hub 308 by a pin 404. While the distal portion of the axially moveable core 808 engages the slider assembly 406 and applies a distal force to distal hub 310 of the cage 300, tension in the control line 888 preferably causes the proximal hub 308 of the cage 300 to move proximally relative the axially moveable core 808, thereby collapsing the intracardiac cage 300.
The diameter of the cage 300 preferably is reduced to approximately ⅓.sup.rd or less of its original diameter when collapsed. The loading collar 882 and peel-away sheath 802 are then advanced distally over the flares 860 and cage 300 until the distal tip of the cage 300 is aligned with the distal end of the peel-away sheath 802 and the distal end of the loading collar 882 is about 1.5 cm from the distal tip of the cage 300. At this point, the flares 860 partially cover the cage 300. The loading collar 882 preferably is removed and discarded.
With the cage 300 partially within the recapture sheath 804 and retracted within the peel-away sheath 802, the entire system preferably is flushed with sterile heparinized saline after attaching stopcocks to the recapture sheath injection port 870, the proximal injection port 818 and distal injection port 820 of the delivery system 800. The recapture sheath 804 and the Touhy-Borst valve 864 are first thoroughly flushed through port 870. The distal injection port 818 and the proximal injection port 820 of the deployment handle 810 are preferably flushed as well. The distal injection port 820 is in fluid communication with lumen 854 of the axially moveable core 808, and the proximal injection port 818 is in fluid communication with injection lumens 826 of the multi-lumen shaft 812. The transseptal sheath 900 placement preferably is reconfirmed using fluoroscopy and contrast media injection.
The delivery system 800, as described above, with the cage 300 coupled thereto, preferably is then inserted into the proximal end of the transseptal sheath 900. To avoid introducing air into the transseptal sheath 900 during insertion of the delivery system 800, a continual, slow flush of sterile heparinized saline preferably is applied through the proximal injection port 818 of the deployment handle 810 to the distal end of the deployment catheter 806 until the tip of the peel-away sheath 802 has been inserted into, and stops in, the hemostatic valve 904 of the transseptal sheath 900. Preferably, the distal tip of the peel-away sheath 802 is inserted approximately 5 mm relative to the proximal end of the transseptal sheath 900.
Under fluoroscopy, the recapture sheath 804 and deployment catheter 806 preferably are advanced, relative to the peel-away sheath 802, approximately 20-30 cm from the proximal end of the transseptal sheath 900, and the system 800 preferably is evaluated for trapped air. The peel-away sheath 802 is preferably not advanced into the transseptal sheath 900 due to the hemostasis valve 904 blocking its passage. If air is present in the system 800, it may be removed by aspirating through the distal injection port 820, recapture sheath injection port 870, or proximal injection port 818. If air cannot be aspirated, the deployment catheter 806 and recapture sheath 804 preferably are moved proximally and the delivery system 800 preferably is removed from the transseptal sheath 900. All air preferably is aspirated and the flushing/introduction procedure preferably is repeated.
The peel-away sheath 802 preferably is manually slid proximally to the proximal end 866 of the recapture sheath 804. The Touhy-Borst valve 864 preferably is loosened and the deployment catheter 806 preferably is advanced distally relative to the recapture sheath 804 until the deployment handle 810 is within about 2 cm of the Touhy-Borst valve 864 of the recapture sheath 804. This causes the cage 300 to be advanced distally within the transseptal sheath 900 such that the recapture sheath 804 no longer covers the cage 300 or the flexible section 850. The Touhy-Borst valve 864 preferably is tightened to secure the deployment catheter 806 to fix relative movement between the deployment catheter 806 and recapture sheath 804.
Under fluoroscopy, the cage 300 preferably is advanced to the tip of the transseptal sheath 900 by distal movement of the deployment catheter 806. The distal hub 310 of the cage 300 preferably is aligned with a transseptal sheath 900 tip radiopaque marker 950, as illustrated in
The position of the cage 300 preferably is maintained by initially holding the deployment handle 810 stable. The transseptal sheath 900 preferably is withdrawn proximally until its tip radiopaque marker 950 is within about 1-2 mm of the septum 216 but still within the left atrium 104. This preferably exposes at least a portion of the cage 300, as shown in
Under fluoroscopy, the cage 300 preferably is expanded at least in part by rotating the control knob 814 clockwise. Rotating the control knob 814 preferably releases tension on the control line 888, preferably allowing the cage 300 to expand, as illustrated in
In one embodiment, the cage 300 is positioned within the left atrium 104 such that the barrier 500B covering its distal end 304 is aligned with the ostium of the left atrial appendage 106. In another embodiment, the cage 300 is positioned within the left atrium 104 such that the barrier 500A covering its proximal end 302 is aligned with a portion of the septum 216, such as a patent foramen ovale 944. In yet another embodiment, the cage 300 is positioned within the left atrium 104 such that the barrier 500B covering its distal end 304 is aligned with the ostium of the left atrial appendage 106 and the barrier 500A covering its proximal end 302 is aligned with a portion of the septum 216, such as a patent foramen ovale 944.
Under fluoroscopy, the expanded diameter of the cage 300 preferably is measured in at least two views to assess the position of the implant within the left atrium 104. The measured implant diameter preferably is compared to the maximum expanded diameter.
Preferably, the proximal and distal injection ports 818, 820 of the deployment handle 810, correlate with the proximal and distal contrast media injections. The proximal contrast media injections are delivered through the delivery catheter lumen 826 to a location proximal to the cage 300. The distal contrast media injections are delivered through the axially movable core 808 to a location distal to the cage 300. Proximal contrast media injections preferably are completed in two views. If the injection rate is insufficient, the recapture sheath injection port 870 may be used independently or in conjunction with the proximal injection port 818 to deliver fluid to a location proximal to the cage 300.
If satisfactory results are obtained, any transverse tension on the left atrial appendage 106 or left atrium 104 preferably is released by exposing the flexible segment 850 of the delivery system 800. The flexible catheter section 828 and the flexible core section 836 preferably are linearly co-located to cooperate as the flexible catheter section 828 of the delivery system 800, as described above. This preferably is accomplished by retracting the transseptal sheath 900 proximally approximately 2 cm to expose the flexible section 828. By exposing the flexible section 828, the flexible section 828 preferably will flex to allow the cage 300 to sit within the left atrium 104 free from transverse forces that may be created, for example, by contractions of the heart acting against the transseptal sheath 900 or deployment catheter 806.
Once the flexible section 828 is exposed, distal contrast media injections preferably are completed in at least two views to verify proper positioning of the cage 300. A flush of saline preferably is used as needed between injections to clear the contrast media from the left atrial appendage 106. Following the contrast media injections, the transseptal sheath 900 preferably is advanced distally to cover the flexible section 828.
Repositioning
If the cage 300 position or results are sub-optimal, the cage 300 preferably may be collapsed and repositioned in the left atrium 104. To do so, under fluoroscopy, the deployment handle 810 preferably is advanced distally to place the radiopaque marker 858 of the axially moveable core 808 at the distal hub 310 of the cage 300. The distal end of the transseptal sheath 900 preferably is aligned with the distal end of the flexible segment 850. The control knob 814 preferably is rotated until the cage 300 has been collapsed to approximately ⅓.sup.rd or less of its expanded diameter. The tip of the transseptal sheath 900 can be withdrawn into the right atrium 114 during recapture to prevent excessive lengthening of the cage 300 within the left atrium 104 and potential tissue trauma. The control knob 814 preferably acts on the control line 888 to place tension on the proximal hub 308 of the cage 300, pulling the proximal hub 308 of the cage 300 proximally relative the distal hub 310 of the cage 300 to collapse the cage 300. The cage 300 preferably can be repositioned and re-expanded.
The stability of the cage 300 preferably is verified in several views. Stability tests preferably are preformed in the following manner. A contrast media filled syringe preferably is connected to the distal injection port 820 of the deployment handle 810. Under fluoroscopy, at least about a 10 mm gap between the tip of the transseptal sheath 900 and the proximal hub 308 of the cage 300 is preferably confirmed.
The stability of the cage 300 in the left atrium 104 preferably is evaluated using fluoroscopy and echocardiography. The recapture sheath Touhy-Borst valve 864 preferably is loosened. Then the deployment handle 810 preferably is alternately retracted and advanced about 5-10 mm while maintaining the position of the transseptal sheath 900 and simultaneously injecting contrast media through the distal injection port 820. This tests how well the implant is held within the left atrium 104.
If the implant stability tests are unacceptable, the cage 300 preferably may be collapsed and repositioned as described above. If repositioning the cage 300 does not achieve an acceptable result, the cage 300 preferably may be collapsed and recaptured as described further below.
The cage 300 preferably meets the following acceptance criteria, associated with the assessment techniques listed below, prior to being released. The assessment techniques to be evaluated preferably include 1) residual compression; 2) implant location; 3) anchor engagement; 4) seal quality; and 5) stability. For residual compression, the implant diameter, as measured by fluoroscopic imaging, preferably is less than the maximum expanded diameter of the cage 300. For implant location, the proximal sealing surface of the cage 300 preferably is positioned between the left atrial appendage 106 ostium and sources of thrombus formation (pectinates, secondary lobes, etc.) (preferably imaged in at least two views). For anchor engagement, the cage 300 frame 402 preferably is positioned within the left atrium 104 so as to engage a row of anchors or barbs 318 in a left atrial 104 wall (preferably imaged in at least two views). For seal quality, the contrast injections preferably show leakage rated no worse than mild (preferably defined as a flow of contrast media, well defined, and filling one-third of the left atrial appendage 106 during a proximal injection over a period of up to about five ventricular beats, preferably imaged in at least two views). For stability, there preferably is no migration or movement of the cage 300 relative to the left atrium 104 or septal defect as a result of the Stability Test, as described above.
Recapture and Retrieval
If cage 300 recapture is desired or necessary (e.g., because a different size cage 300 is necessary or desired), or if acceptable positioning or sealing cannot be achieved, the cage 300 preferably is fully collapsed as described above. Once the cage 300 is collapsed, the locking collar 872 of the peel away sheath 802 preferably is unlocked. The peel-away portion 874 of the peel-away sheath 802 preferably is split up to the reinforced section 876 and removed. The reinforced section 876 of the peel-away sheath 802 preferably is slid proximally to the hub of the recapture sheath 804. The Touhy-Borst valve 864 on the proximal end of the recapture sheath 804 preferably is slightly loosened to allow smooth movement of the recapture sheath 804 over deployment catheter 806 without allowing air to enter past the Touhy-Borst valve 864 seal. By removing the peel-away portion 874 of peel-away sheath 802, the recapture sheath 804 can now be advanced further distally relative to the transseptal sheath 900.
While holding the deployment catheter 806 and transseptal sheath 900 in place, the recapture sheath 804 preferably is advanced distally into the transseptal sheath 900 until a half marker band 868 on the recapture sheath 804 is aligned with a full marker band 950 on the transseptal sheath 900. This preferably exposes the recapture flares 860 outside the transseptal sheath 900.
The collapsed cage 300 preferably is retracted into the recapture sheath 804 by simultaneously pulling the deployment handle 810 and maintaining the position of the recapture sheath 804 until approximately half the cage 300 is seated in the recapture sheath 804. The Touhy-Borst valve 864 on the recapture sheath 804 preferably is tightened over the deployment catheter 806. The recapture sheath 804 and cage 300 preferably are retracted into the transseptal sheath 900 by pulling on the recapture sheath 804 while maintaining the position of the transseptal sheath 900, preferably maintaining left atrial access. The recapture flares 860 of the recapture sheath 804 preferably cover at least some of the anchor or barbs 318 on the cage 300 as the cage 300 is retracted proximally into the transseptal sheath 900.
De-Coupling
If the cage 300 position and function are acceptable, and cage 300 recapture is not necessary, the cage 300 preferably is released from the delivery system 800. Under fluoroscopy, the transseptal sheath 900 preferably is advanced to the proximal hub 308 of the cage 300 for support. The release knob 816 on the proximal end of the deployment handle 810 preferably is rotated to release the cage 300. Rotating the release knob 816 preferably causes a mating surface 856, such as a threaded portion, of the distal shaft 834 of the axially movable core 808 to rotate with respect to the slider assembly 406 such that the mating surface 856 preferably is decoupled from the slider assembly 406. Under fluoroscopy, after the axially movable core 808 is decoupled from the cage 300, the release knob 816 preferably is retracted until the distal shaft 834 of the axially movable core 808 is at least about 2 cm within the transseptal sheath 900.
Under fluoroscopy, while assuring that transseptal access is maintained, the delivery system 800 preferably is retracted and removed through the transseptal sheath 900. Under fluoroscopy, the transseptal sheath 900 position preferably is verified to be approximately 1 cm away from the face of the cage 300. Contrast injections, fluoroscopy and/or echocardiography preferably may be used to confirm proper positioning and delivery of the cage 300 and position with respect to the left atrial appendage 106 and septum 216. The transseptal sheath 900 preferably is withdrawn, as illustrated in
When the cage 300 is positioned within the left atrium 104 as illustrated in
One advantage of the intracardiac cage 300 is that gross stretching or distension of the patent foramen ovale 944 opening do not occur, either for sizing, or because of oblique attachment. Although the intracardiac cage 300 has been primarily described with respect to implantation within the left atrium 104, it should be understood by those of skill in the art that the same or equivalent structures can be used within the right atrium of the heart to provide a barrier 500 against the septum secundum 946 and/or the ostium of the right atrial appendage 116. In addition, the same or similar structures may be used to provide a barrier 500 against any septal defect, whether in the interatrial septum or the interventricular septum. For example, the present invention may be used to provide a barrier to seal off, block, or filter an atrial septal defect (ASD), a ventricular septal defect (VSD), a patent foramen ovale (PFO), or a patent ductus arteriosis (PDA).
Although throughout this application the term cage has been used, those of skill in the art should understand that the terms implant and occlusion device may be used as well to describe identical or equivalent structures. One of ordinary skill in the art will appreciate that all of the disclosures herein are applicable to a wide variety of structures that include both cages and implants that may or may not also be occlusion devices. Routine experimentation will demonstrate those limited circumstances under which certain disclosures and combinations thereof are not beneficial.
This application is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 14/846,127, filed Sep. 4, 2015, which is a continuation U.S. application Ser. No. 13/116,798, filed May 26, 2011, now abandoned, which is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 11/229,313, filed Sep. 16, 2005, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,972,359.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
178283 | French | Jun 1876 | A |
1967318 | Monahan | Jul 1934 | A |
3402710 | Paleschuck | Sep 1968 | A |
3540431 | Mobin-Uddin | Nov 1970 | A |
3557794 | Van Patten | Jan 1971 | A |
3638652 | Kelley | Feb 1972 | A |
3811449 | Gravlee et al. | May 1974 | A |
3844302 | Klein | Oct 1974 | A |
3874388 | King et al. | Apr 1975 | A |
4007743 | Blake | Feb 1977 | A |
4175545 | Termanini | Nov 1979 | A |
4309776 | Berguer | Jan 1982 | A |
4341218 | Ü | Jul 1982 | A |
4585000 | Hershenson | Apr 1986 | A |
4603693 | Conta et al. | Aug 1986 | A |
4611594 | Grayhack et al. | Sep 1986 | A |
4619246 | Molgaard-Nielsen et al. | Oct 1986 | A |
4638803 | Rand | Jan 1987 | A |
4665906 | Jervis | May 1987 | A |
4681588 | Ketharanathan | Jul 1987 | A |
4710192 | Liotta et al. | Dec 1987 | A |
4718417 | Kittrell et al. | Jan 1988 | A |
4759348 | Cawood | Jul 1988 | A |
4793348 | Palmaz | Dec 1988 | A |
4827907 | Tashiro | May 1989 | A |
4832055 | Palestrant | May 1989 | A |
4917089 | Sideris | Apr 1990 | A |
4921484 | Hillstead | May 1990 | A |
4960412 | Fink | Oct 1990 | A |
4998972 | Chin et al. | Mar 1991 | A |
5037810 | Saliba, Jr. | Aug 1991 | A |
5041090 | Scheglov et al. | Aug 1991 | A |
5041093 | Chu | Aug 1991 | A |
5042707 | Taheri | Aug 1991 | A |
5053009 | Herzberg | Oct 1991 | A |
5064435 | Porter | Nov 1991 | A |
5071407 | Termin et al. | Dec 1991 | A |
5078736 | Behl | Jan 1992 | A |
5098440 | Hillstead | Mar 1992 | A |
5108418 | Lefebvre | Apr 1992 | A |
5108420 | Marks | Apr 1992 | A |
5108474 | Riedy et al. | Apr 1992 | A |
5116360 | Pinchuk et al. | May 1992 | A |
5122136 | Guglielmi et al. | Jun 1992 | A |
5171259 | Inoue | Dec 1992 | A |
5176692 | Wilk et al. | Jan 1993 | A |
5192301 | Kamiya et al. | Mar 1993 | A |
5211658 | Clouse | May 1993 | A |
5234458 | Metais | Aug 1993 | A |
5256146 | Ensminger et al. | Oct 1993 | A |
5258000 | Gianturco | Nov 1993 | A |
5258042 | Mehta | Nov 1993 | A |
5284488 | Sideris | Feb 1994 | A |
5304184 | Hathaway et al. | Apr 1994 | A |
5306234 | Johnson | Apr 1994 | A |
5312341 | Turi | May 1994 | A |
5334217 | Das | Aug 1994 | A |
5344439 | Otten | Sep 1994 | A |
5350398 | Pavcnik et al. | Sep 1994 | A |
5350399 | Erlebacher et al. | Sep 1994 | A |
5353784 | Nady-Mohamed | Oct 1994 | A |
5366460 | Eberbach | Nov 1994 | A |
5375612 | Cottenceau et al. | Dec 1994 | A |
5397355 | Marin et al. | Mar 1995 | A |
5417699 | Klein et al. | May 1995 | A |
5421832 | Lefebvre | Jun 1995 | A |
5425744 | Fagan et al. | Jun 1995 | A |
5427119 | Swartz et al. | Jun 1995 | A |
5433727 | Sideris | Jul 1995 | A |
5443454 | Tanabe et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
5443478 | Purdy | Aug 1995 | A |
5451235 | Lock et al. | Sep 1995 | A |
5454365 | Bonutti | Oct 1995 | A |
5464408 | Duc | Nov 1995 | A |
5469867 | Schmitt | Nov 1995 | A |
5490856 | Person et al. | Feb 1996 | A |
5497774 | Swartz et al. | Mar 1996 | A |
5499975 | Cope et al. | Mar 1996 | A |
5522790 | Moll et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
5522822 | Phelps et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
5522836 | Palermo | Jun 1996 | A |
5527322 | Klein et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
5527338 | Purdy et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
5558093 | Pomeranz | Sep 1996 | A |
5558652 | Henke | Sep 1996 | A |
5569204 | Cramer | Oct 1996 | A |
5591196 | Mann et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
5614204 | Cochrum | Mar 1997 | A |
5634936 | Linden et al. | Jun 1997 | A |
5634942 | Chevillon et al. | Jun 1997 | A |
5637097 | Yoon | Jun 1997 | A |
5643282 | Kieturakis | Jul 1997 | A |
5643292 | Hart | Jul 1997 | A |
5649953 | Lefebvre | Jul 1997 | A |
5662671 | Barbut et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5669933 | Simon et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5693067 | Purdy | Dec 1997 | A |
5695525 | Mulhauser et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5700285 | Myers et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5702421 | Schneidt | Dec 1997 | A |
5704910 | Humes | Jan 1998 | A |
5709224 | Behl et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
5709704 | Nott et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
5709707 | Lock et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
5722400 | Ockuly et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5724975 | Negus et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5725512 | Swartz et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5725552 | Kotula et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5725568 | Hastings | Mar 1998 | A |
5733294 | Forber et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5733302 | Myler et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5735290 | Sterman et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5749880 | Banas et al. | May 1998 | A |
5749883 | Halpern | May 1998 | A |
5749894 | Engelson | May 1998 | A |
5766219 | Horton | Jun 1998 | A |
5769816 | Barbut et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5776097 | Massoud | Jul 1998 | A |
5782860 | Epstein et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5785679 | Abolfathi et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5800454 | Jacobsen et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5800457 | Gelbfish | Sep 1998 | A |
5800512 | Lentz et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5807261 | Benaron et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5810874 | Lefebvre | Sep 1998 | A |
5814028 | Swartz et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5814029 | Hassett | Sep 1998 | A |
5820591 | Thompson et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5823198 | Jones et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5830228 | Knapp et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5833673 | Ockuly et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5836913 | Orth et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5836968 | Simon et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5840027 | Swartz et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5843118 | Sepetka et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5846260 | Maahs | Dec 1998 | A |
5846261 | Kotula et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5848969 | Panescu et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5849005 | Garrison et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5851232 | Lois | Dec 1998 | A |
5853422 | Huebsch et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5855597 | Jayaraman | Jan 1999 | A |
5865791 | Whayne et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5865802 | Yoon et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5868708 | Hart et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5876367 | Kaganov et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5879296 | Ockuly et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5879366 | Shaw et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5882340 | Yoon | Mar 1999 | A |
5885258 | Sachdeva et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5891558 | Bell et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
5895399 | Barbut et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
5904680 | Kordis et al. | May 1999 | A |
5904703 | Gilson | May 1999 | A |
5906207 | Shen | May 1999 | A |
5910154 | Tsugita et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5911734 | Tsugita et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5916236 | Muijs Van de Moer et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5925074 | Gingras et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5925075 | Myers et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5928192 | Maahs | Jul 1999 | A |
5928260 | Chin et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5935145 | Villar et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5935147 | Kensey et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5935148 | Villar et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5941249 | Maynard | Aug 1999 | A |
5941896 | Kerr | Aug 1999 | A |
5947997 | Pavcnik et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5951589 | Epstein et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5951599 | McCrory | Sep 1999 | A |
5954694 | Sunseri | Sep 1999 | A |
5957940 | Tanner et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5961545 | Lentz et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5976174 | Ruiz | Nov 1999 | A |
5980555 | Barbut et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5989281 | Barbut et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5993469 | McKenzie et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5993483 | Gianotti | Nov 1999 | A |
5997557 | Barbut et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6004280 | Buck et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6004348 | Banas et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6007523 | Mangosong | Dec 1999 | A |
6007557 | Ambrisco et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6010517 | Baccaro | Jan 2000 | A |
6010522 | Barbut et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6013093 | Nott et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6024754 | Engelson | Feb 2000 | A |
6024755 | Addis | Feb 2000 | A |
6024756 | Huebsch et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6027520 | Tsugita et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6033420 | Hahnen | Mar 2000 | A |
6036720 | Abrams et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6042598 | Tsugita et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6048331 | Tsugita et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6051014 | Jang | Apr 2000 | A |
6051015 | Maahs | Apr 2000 | A |
6056720 | Morse | May 2000 | A |
6063070 | Eder | May 2000 | A |
6066126 | Li et al. | May 2000 | A |
6068621 | Balceta et al. | May 2000 | A |
6074357 | Kaganov et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6076012 | Swanson et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6079414 | Roth | Jun 2000 | A |
6080182 | Shaw et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6080183 | Tsugita et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6083239 | Addis | Jul 2000 | A |
6090084 | Hassett et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6096053 | Bates | Aug 2000 | A |
6110243 | Wnenchak et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6124523 | Banas et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6132438 | Fleischman et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6135991 | Muni et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6136016 | Barbut et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6139527 | Laufer et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6139573 | Sogard et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6152144 | Lesh et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6156055 | Ravenscroft | Dec 2000 | A |
6161543 | Cox et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6171329 | Shaw et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6179859 | Bates et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6203531 | Ockuly et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6214029 | Thill et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6231561 | Frazier et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6231589 | Wessman et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6245012 | Kleshinski | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6251122 | Tsukernik | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6258115 | Dubrul | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6270530 | Eldridge et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6270902 | Tedeschi et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6277138 | Levinson et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6285898 | Ben-Haim | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6290674 | Roue et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6290708 | Kugel et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6312407 | Zadno-Azizi et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6328727 | Frazier et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6342062 | Suon et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6346116 | Brooks et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6361545 | Macoviak et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6364895 | Greenhalgh | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6368338 | Kónya et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6371971 | Tsugita et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6375670 | Greenhalgh | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6391044 | Yadav et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6398803 | Layne et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6402746 | Whayne et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6402779 | Colone et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6419669 | Frazier et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6440152 | Gainor et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6443972 | Bosma et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6447530 | Ostrovsky et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6468291 | Bates et al. | Oct 2002 | B2 |
6468301 | Amplatz et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6488689 | Kaplan et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6511496 | Huter et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6514280 | Gilson | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6517573 | Pollock et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6551303 | Van Tassel et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6551344 | Thill | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6558401 | Azizi | May 2003 | B1 |
6558405 | McInnes | May 2003 | B1 |
6562058 | Seguin et al. | May 2003 | B2 |
6589251 | Yee et al. | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6599308 | Amplatz | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6638294 | Palmer | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6652555 | Van Tassel et al. | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6652556 | Van Tassel et al. | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6666861 | Grabek | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6689150 | Van Tassel et al. | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6702825 | Frazier et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6702834 | Boylan et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6730108 | Van Tassel et al. | May 2004 | B2 |
6837901 | Rabkin et al. | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6855153 | Saadat | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6949113 | Van Tassel et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6994092 | van der Burg et al. | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7011671 | Welch | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7044134 | Khairkhahan et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7128073 | van der Berg et al. | Oct 2006 | B1 |
7169164 | Borillo et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7175656 | Khairkhahan | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7918882 | Pavcnik et al. | Apr 2011 | B2 |
8097015 | Devellian | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8192479 | Paul, Jr. | Jun 2012 | B2 |
8257428 | Khairkhahan et al. | Sep 2012 | B2 |
8663217 | Kassab | Mar 2014 | B2 |
8672827 | Nikolic et al. | Mar 2014 | B2 |
20010020181 | Layne | Sep 2001 | A1 |
20010034537 | Shaw et al. | Oct 2001 | A1 |
20010037141 | Yee et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20020022860 | Borillo et al. | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020035374 | Borillo et al. | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020045931 | Sogard et al. | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020062133 | Gilson et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20020082675 | Myers | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020099439 | Schwartz et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020138094 | Borillo et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020138097 | Ostrovsky et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020169475 | Gainor et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020177855 | Greene, Jr. et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020178570 | Sogard et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030017775 | Sowinski et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030023266 | Borillo et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030057156 | Peterson et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030060871 | Hill et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030130680 | Russell | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030181942 | Sutton et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030191526 | Van Tassel et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030195555 | Khairkhahan et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030199923 | Khairkhahan et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030204203 | Khairkhahan et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030212432 | Khairkhahan et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20030220667 | van der Burg et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20040034366 | van der Burg et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040044361 | Frazier et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040049210 | Vam Tassel et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040098031 | van der Burg et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040122467 | Van Tassel et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040220610 | Kreidler et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040230222 | van der Burg et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20050004652 | van der Burg et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050113861 | Corcoran et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050203568 | van der Burg et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20060199995 | Vijay | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060253148 | Leone et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060293739 | Vijay | Dec 2006 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
9313712 | Jul 1993 | WO |
9504132 | Feb 1995 | WO |
9522359 | Aug 1995 | WO |
9601591 | Jan 1996 | WO |
9640356 | Dec 1996 | WO |
9728749 | Aug 1997 | WO |
9735522 | Oct 1997 | WO |
9802100 | Jan 1998 | WO |
9817187 | Apr 1998 | WO |
9823322 | Jun 1998 | WO |
9827868 | Jul 1998 | WO |
9905977 | Feb 1999 | WO |
9907289 | Feb 1999 | WO |
9908607 | Feb 1999 | WO |
9923976 | May 1999 | WO |
9925252 | May 1999 | WO |
9930640 | Jun 1999 | WO |
9944510 | Sep 1999 | WO |
0016705 | Mar 2000 | WO |
0027292 | May 2000 | WO |
0067669 | Nov 2000 | WO |
0108743 | Feb 2001 | WO |
0115629 | Mar 2001 | WO |
0130266 | May 2001 | WO |
0130267 | May 2001 | WO |
0130268 | May 2001 | WO |
0215793 | Feb 2002 | WO |
0217809 | Mar 2002 | WO |
0224106 | Mar 2002 | WO |
02071977 | Sep 2002 | WO |
03007825 | Jan 2003 | WO |
03008030 | Jan 2003 | WO |
03032818 | Apr 2003 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20160374657 A1 | Dec 2016 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 14846127 | Sep 2015 | US |
Child | 15261311 | US | |
Parent | 13116798 | May 2011 | US |
Child | 14846127 | US | |
Parent | 11229313 | Sep 2005 | US |
Child | 13116798 | US |