Intramedullary interlocking fixation devices for the distal radius

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 8092453
  • Patent Number
    8,092,453
  • Date Filed
    Tuesday, May 2, 2006
    18 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, January 10, 2012
    12 years ago
Abstract
Medical kits for treating fractures in or adjacent the wrist and distal forearm employ an intramedullary interlocking fixation rod (i.e, it interlocks the distal and proximal fracture fragments together) to stabilize the skeletal structure in a manner which can inhibit the amount of collapse or loss in skeletal length exhibited by a patient with a distal radius fracture.
Description
FIELD OF THE INVENTION

This invention relates to devices and methods for treating distal radius fractures.


BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

Distal radius fractures are among the most common type of bone fracture of the upper extremities. The distal radius fracture is often called a “Colles” fracture (named after a 19th Century British surgeon who described the fracture). The Colles fracture is associated with a fracture of a distal tip or distal end portion of the radius.


Distal radius fractures are, unfortunately, most common in the elderly segment of the population. This is because the elderly tend to exhibit some degree of bone density loss or osteoporotic condition making their bones more susceptible to injury. Indeed, just as osteoporosis is known to affect women more often and more severely than men, distal radius fractures are much more common in females than males, typically on the order of about 20:1. Distal radius fractures generally occur as a result of a fall, because the patient tends to brace for the fall by outstretching the hand which then fractures upon impact, at the distal radius at or adjacent the wrist.


As shown in FIGS. 1 and 2, the distal radius fracture is such that the major fracture line 15 associated with this type of injury generally occurs just above or proximal to the articular joint surface 11 of the distal radius at the wrist about the metaphysis 12. As shown in FIGS. 1 and 2, one common distal radius fracture type separates the shaft 13 of the radius 10 from the distal end portion of the bone. That is, the fracture line 15 defines a first major bone fragment 18 which is located above the fracture line 15 (the distal side) proximate the articular joint surface 11 and extends substantially medially (laterally) across the radius 10 in the metaphysis region. Although not shown, the fracture may also produce smaller bone fragments or splinters along the fracture line. Further, the distal end portion of the radius may be present as multiple (vertically and/or horizontally oriented) fragments disrupting the articular joint surface itself. This latter type of Colles fracture is known as a comminuted intraarticular fracture (not shown).



FIG. 1 illustrates the fracture line 15 in the radius 10 as a substantially horizontal line which produces an upper or distal fracture fragment 18 as a substantially unitary fragment. Similarly, FIG. 2 illustrates a fracture line 15 in the radius 10 which is offset from a horizontal axis.


Distal radius fractures can be difficult to treat, particularly in the older osteoporotic patient. Conventionally, this type of fracture has been treated by a closed (non-surgical) reduction and application of a splint (such as a plaster compression dressing) or a cast (typically circular plaster or fiberglass). Unfortunately, primarily because of the patient's osteoporosis, during the healing process, and despite the splint/cast immobilization, the fracture fragments can settle, potentially causing a collapse at the fracture line in the distal radius. FIG. 2 illustrates a loss of radial inclination (in degrees) and a shortened length in the skeletal length line (shown with respect to a neutral length line “L”) which can occur after a fracture in the distal radius. That is, even healed, these types of fractures may cause shortening or collapse of the bone structure relative to the original skeletal length line. This, in turn, can result in deformity and pain.


Treatment options for a collapsed distal radius fracture are relatively limited. The primary conventional treatments include the use of devices which can be characterized as either external fixation devices or internal fixation devices. External fixation devices are those that stabilize a fracture through the use of percutaneous pins which typically affix one or more bone portions to an external (anchoring or stabilizing) device. Internal fixation devices are those devices which are configured to reside entirely within the subject (internal to the body). Percutaneous pins can be used alone, without anchoring devices, for fixation of Colles type fractures. The use of external devices has conventionally been thought to be particularly indicated in cases of bone toss to preserve skeletal length as noted, for example, in U.S. Pat. No. 5,571,103 to Bailey at col. 1, lines 35-43. However, such devices can be bulky, cumbersome, and or invasive to the user or patient. Further the external fixation devices may not be suitable for use in soft osteoporotic bone.


In view of the foregoing, there remains a need for improved distal radius fracture treatment devices and techniques.


SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

In a preferred embodiment the present invention provides methods and devices for treating fractures in or adjacent the wrist and distal forearm. The present invention is particularly useful for stabilizing and treating distal radius fractures of a patient. The devices and methods of the present invention employs an intramedullary interlocking fixation rod (i.e, it interlocks the distal and proximal fracture fragments together) to stabilize the skeletal structure in a manner which can inhibit the amount of collapse or loss in skeletal length exhibited by a patient with a distal radius fracture. The devices and methods of the present invention may be especially useful for treating distal radius fractures in subjects with osteoporosis.


One aspect of the invention is a method for treating a distal radius fracture of a patient comprising the use of an internal fixation rod. As noted above, the radius anatomically has an articular joint surfaces a metaphysis region, a shaft portion and a medullary canal associated therewith. The distal radius fracture has a fracture line which divides the radius into a distal fracture fragment portion and a proximal fracture fragment portion. The distal fragment portion includes the distal end of the radius proximate the articular joint surface, and the distal portion of the fracture has a width thereacross. The method comprises the steps of: (a) installing an elongated rod having opposing proximal and distal portions into the medullary canal of the patient such that the proximal portion of the rod resides above the fracture line (closer to the elbow) and the distal portion of the rod resides below the fracture line (closer to the hand); (b) securing a distal fixation member to the elongated rod and into the distal end portion of the radius at a location which is below the fracture line such that the distal fixation member extends internal of the patient substantially laterally across a portion of the width of the distal fracture fragment; and (c) anchoring the elongated rod inside the medullary canal of the radius at a location which is above (distal to) the fracture line.


Another aspect of the present invention is an internal fixation device for eating or repairing distal radius fractures having a fracture line forming distal and proximal fracture fragments. The radius is anatomically configured with a distal articular joint surface, a metaphysis region, a shaft, and a medullary canal. The anatomic position of the hand is palm forward or front such that the medial orientation is next to the body (fifth finger or ulna side of hand) and the lateral orientation is away from the body (thumb or radial side). Generally stated, the distal portion of the radius has a width which extends across (a major portion of) the arm from the medial side to the lateral side. The device includes an elongated fixation rod having opposing proximal and distal portions. The distal portion includes a head with a laterally extending distal aperture formed therein, and the proximal portion comprises at least one proximal aperture formed therein. The elongated fixation rod proximal portion is sized and configured such that, in position, it resides in the shaft inside a portion of the medullary canal of the radius of a patient. The device also includes a distal fixation member configured to enter the distal aperture and attach to the rod and the distal fracture fragment to hold the distal portion of the rod to the distal fracture fragment. The device further includes at least one proximal fixation member, a respective one for each of the at least one proximal apertures. The proximal fixation member is configured to secure the lower portion of the fixation rod to the radius at a position which is distal to the fracture line. In position, the elongated fixation rod is configured to reside within the radius, and the distal fixation member and the at least one proximal fixation member are configured to reside internal of the body of the patient.


In a preferred embodiment, the elongated fixation rod has a curvilinear profile. The curvilinear profile includes a distal curve portion at the distal portion of the device. The distal curve portion is adapted to accommodate the radial styloid region of the radius proximate the articular joint surface. The rod can also be provided as a plurality of segments matable or attachable. In one embodiment an intermediate segment can be provided in different lengths to allow for the adjustment of length according to a patient's anatomical considerations. Of course, the rod can be a unitary body provided in a number of standard sizes preferably statistically representative of the treatment population.


The foregoing and other objects and aspects of the present invention are explained in detail in the specification set forth below.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS


FIG. 1 is an anterior-posterior view of a distal radius fracture illustrating a fracture line proximate the articular joint surface.



FIG. 2 is an anterior-posterior view of a distal radius fracture similar to that shown in FIG. 1. This figure illustrates an alternatively configured fracture line proximate the articular joint surface.



FIG. 3A is an anterior-posterior view of an intramedullary fixation rod attached to the radius for treating a distal radius fracture according to an embodiment of the present invention.



FIG. 3B is an exploded view of the distal fixation attachment member shown inserted into the fixation rod in FIG. 3A according to one embodiment of the present invention.



FIG. 4 is a front schematic view of the distal fixation rod of FIG. 3A in position as an internal fixation device held within the body of the patient according to one embodiment of the present invention.



FIG. 5A is a lateral view of an intramedullary rod configured to interlock or affix the bone fragments of a distal radius fracture according to one embodiment of the present invention.



FIG. 5B is a cross-sectional view of the rod shown in FIG. 5A taken along line 5B-5B.



FIG. 6 is a perspective view of an intramedullary fixation device according to one embodiment of the present invention.



FIG. 7 is a side view (shown oriented anterior to posterior) of an alternate embodiment of an intramedullary system according to the present invention.



FIG. 8 is a side view (shown oriented anterior to posterior) off another embodiment of an intramedullary system according to the present invention.



FIG. 9A is a front anterior-posterior view of an alternate embodiment of a distal fixation rod according to the present invention.



FIG. 9B is an exploded view of the biked or multi-segment according to FIG. 9A.



FIG. 9C is a front view of a set of intermediate rod segments according to an embodiment of the present invention.



FIG. 10 is a schematic side view of an intramedullary system with an external detachable positioning guide according to an embodiment of the present invention.



FIG. 11 is a block diagram of the steps of treating a distal radius fracture according to one embodiment of the present invention.



FIG. 12 is perspective view of the arm of a patient illustrating a sigmoid or longitudinal incision over the radial styloid area.



FIG. 13 is an enlarged schematic view of the incision site in the patient shown in FIG. 12 to illustrate preparation of the site for positioning intramedullary fixation rods for distal radius fractures according to an embodiment of the present invention.



FIG. 14 is an enlarged schematic view of the incision site shown in FIG. 13 illustrating that a small bone window may be made or formed into the radius such that it extends across the fracture site according to the present invention.



FIG. 15A is an anterior-posterior view of the bone window shown in FIG. 14.



FIG. 15B is a schematic view of the prepared bone site shown in FIG. 15A illustrating the use of a sound or broach instrument which is sized and configured to be inserted into the intramedullary canal of the radius to determine size and/or open or prepare the canal to receive a fixation rod according to an embodiment of the present invention.



FIG. 16 is a top anterior-posterior view of an intramedullary fixation rod assembled to a rod driver and screw attachment guide according to one embodiment of the present invention.



FIG. 17 is a side (lateral) view of the device shown in FIG. 16.



FIG. 18 is a side of the device shown in FIGS. 16 and 17 showing the device in position in the patient.



FIG. 19 is a top anterior-posterior view of the device shown in position in FIG. 18.



FIG. 20 is a schematic view of the fixation rod in position in the subject according to an embodiment of the present invention.





DESCRIPTION OF PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS

The present invention will now be described more fully hereinafter with reference to the accompanying figures, in which preferred embodiments of the invention are shown. This invention may, however, be embodied in many different forms and should not be construed as limited to the embodiments set forth herein. Like numbers refer to like elements throughout. In the figures, certain layers, regions, or components may be exaggerated for clarity.


As shown in FIG. 3A, in a preferred embodiment, the intramedullary fixation device 25 includes an elongated axially extending rod 26 with a distal portion 27 and a proximal portion 28. The device 25 also includes a distal fixation member 30 and at least one proximal fixation member 35 (shown as two proximal fixation members 35a, 35b). The rod 26 includes a head 26h at the distal end portion 27 of the rod 26. A distal aperture 30a is formed into the head 26h of the distal portion such that it extends across the width of the rod 26.


As shown, the distal fixation member 30 is configured to enter and extend through and beyond the distal aperture 30a to engage with the distal fracture fragment 18 and secure the rod 26 and the distal fracture fragment 18 theretogether. Preferably, the distal fixation member 30 is sized to extend across a major portion of the width of the distal fracture fragment 18. More preferably, the distal fixation member 30 is sized with a length which is sufficient to extend across substantially all of the fracture fragment 18 so as to provide support for the radial, center, and ulna aspects of the distal fracture fragment 18 (the ulna aspect being the part of the fracture fragment adjacent or proximate the ulna 14 while the radial aspect being the portion of the fracture fragment on the opposing side of the view shown in FIG. 3A and the center aspect being the portion in between).



FIG. 3B illustrates the distal fixation member 30 apart from the rod 26. The distal fixation member 30 can be configured as any suitable attachment means to secure the distal fracture fragment 18 to the rod 26, while also providing lateral structural reinforcement. For example, but not limited to, the attachment means can be one or more of a pin, nail, threaded or partially threaded member such as a screw, or a combination of the above. FIG. 3B illustrates the distal fixation member 30 as having, in serial order, from one end to the other, a head portion 30h, a threaded portion 30th, and a pin portion 30p.


In one embodiment, as shown in FIG. 3A, the head of the distal fixation member 30h extends beyond the edge of the body of the rod 26. However, as schematically shown in FIG. 7, the aperture 25a can be configured (such as with a countersunk or recessed portion configured with a depth sufficient to receive the head 30h therein) such that upon assembly, the distal fixation member head 30h is substantially flush or recessed with the outer contour or profile of the rod 26. FIG. 3A also illustrates that, in position in the patient, the distal fixation member 30 is preferably configured to directly abut the outer surface of the rod 26. FIG. 6 is a perspective view of one embodiment of the intramedullary fixation device 25. This embodiment shows that the rod 26 is configured as a unitary body with a recess to receive the head 30h of the distal fixation member 30.


In a preferred embodiment, the rod 26 is configured with a profile 26p which is curvilinear when viewed from the anterior-posterior view, as shown, for example, in FIGS. 3A and 4. As shown, the proximal portion of the rod 28 is substantially linear and is configured to anally extend within the medullary canal of the patient in the radial shaft. As the rod 26 approaches the metaphysis region (12, FIG. 1) it gradually curves from the substantially linear axial extending portion so as to position the distal end 27e of the rod 26 proximate the radial styloid region of the distal radius. Preferably, the rod 26 is configured to follow the contour line of the radius as it transitions from the proximal portion 28 having a substantially linear contour in the shaft region to the distal portion 27 which has a curvilinear or slight arcuately contoured shape proximate the metaphysis region.



FIGS. 3A and 4 also illustrate that the head 26h of the rod 26 is preferably configured with a body which has an increased perimeter or area size with respect to the proximal 28 portion of the rod 26. It is also preferred that the distal end of the head 26h be beveled or inclined 27i. As shown, the tip or end of the head 26b lopes downwardly from the side surface adjacent the radial portion toward the ulna aspect of the fracture fragment 18.


It is additionally referred that the distal aperture 30a be formed in the rod 26 such that it allows the distal fixation member 30 to extend therethrough and reside at a position which is angularly offset tore the axial is. As show in FIG. 3A, the axial axis is coincident with the centerline of the proximal portion of the rod (indicated by the letter “a” in FIG. 3A). Preferably, the distal fixation member 30 extends at a position which is less than about ninety degrees, and preferably between about 10 degrees to less than about 90 degrees, away from the axial axis, such that it is approximately in-line with the articular surface.


In this embodiment, the head 26h of the rod 26 can buttress the distal radius region and increase the structural effectiveness of the rod. Thus, together with the proper positioning of the distal portion 27 of the rod 26 in the distal radius and/or the medial extension of the distal fixation member 30, the head 26h, can reinforce or positively affect the structural integrity of the device to help support the radial styloid region of the distal fracture fragment.


Referring again to FIG. 3A and FIG. 4, at least one, and preferably two or more, proximal fixation members 35 are used to secure the rod 26 to the shaft region 13 of the radius 10 at the lower or proximal portion of the rod 26. FIG. 3A illustrates the use of two similarly sized proximal fixation members 35a, 35b, respectively, while FIG. 4 illustrates the use of one 35. Preferably, as shown in FIG. 5A, the proximal fixation members 35a, 35b are respective self-tapping screws positioned on the rod 26 such that they are proximate to each other. However, pins, nails, or other attachment means (as well as numbers and positioning of same) can also be used as will be appreciated by one of skill in the art. It will be appreciated, by those of skill in the art, that the proximal fixation members 35 and corresponding apertures 25a are primarily used to inhibit shortening of the skeletal structure. As shown in FIG. 5A, the proximal fixation member 35 transversely extends in serial order, through a portion of the radius shaft, through a corresponding proximal receiving aperture 25a formed in the rod 26, and then into an opposing portion of the radius shaft to thereby secure or locate and hold the proximal portion of the rod 25 relative to the radius, the proximal fixation member having a length and opposing ends sized and configured accordingly 36, 38.



FIG. 4 schematically illustrates the preferred post-operative position of the intramedullary fixation device 25 in the patient. That is, post-operatively in position in the patient, the rod 26 and distal and proximal fixation members 30, 35 are held within the body of the subject such that the device 25 is an internal fixation device and is devoid of externally located coupling or fixation members.


As shown in FIG. 4, the rod 26 is installed into the medullary canal of the patient such that the distal portion 27 of the rod 26 resides distal to the fracture line 15 (but substantially within the distal radius, preferably so as to reside proximal to the articular joint surface 11) and the bottom or proximal portion 28 of the rod 26 extends through and resides proximal to the fracture line 15. The distal fixation member 30 is secured to the rod 26 and to the distal end portion of the radius at a location which is distal to the fracture line 15 in the metaphysis region of the distal radius. As is also shown, the distal fixation member 30 extends (to reside internal of the body of the patient) substantially transversely across a portion of the width of the distal fracture fragment 18. The device 25 may not be preferred for use with commuted distal radius fractures.


In position, the rod 26 is configured such that it also extends through a portion of the medullary canal to terminate therein in the shaft region 13 of the radius 10 (FIG. 1) (at a location which is proximally spaced away from the fracture line 15). The proximal portion 28 of the rod 26 is anchored to the radius so as to reside inside the medullary canal of the radius. The proximal portion 28 of the rod 26 is fixed in position relative to the shaft of the radius by the use of at least one pin, screw, or the like, as discussed above. As is also noted above, it is more preferred that two (and potentially three or more) to provide increased structural stability so as to inhibit the propensity of the rod 26 to toggle or move distally with the distal fragment.



FIG. 4 also illustrates that the proximal end of the rod 28e may be configured with a reduced cross-sectional size or tapered perimeter relative to the portion of the rod 26 thereabove to allow for ease of insertion into the patient. Preferably, as shown, the proximal end of the device 28e is substantially pointed.



FIG. 5A illustrates the rod 26 with a length “L”, a width “W” and a thickness “T”. It is envisioned that the rod 26 be provided or be made available for use in a plurality of lengths and widths so that the clinician can select the appropriate dimensions according to the particular anatomical needs of the patient. Preferably, for the distal radius fracture, the length of the rod 26 is between about 2-5 inches long, and more preferably between about 2.5 inches-4.0 inches long. It is also preferred that the width of the rod 26 be provided in an arrangement of incremental sizes. It is thought that suitable widths may be between about 2-8 mm in width and more preferably between about (2.5-4 mm) in width.


As shown in FIG. 5B, the rod 26 is held in the medullary canal of the radius of the patient. The lower or proximal portion 28 of the rod 26 is preferably held substantially centrally in the shaft portion 13 of the radius 10. In one embodiment, the cross sectional shape of the rod 26 is rectangular. The rod 26 can be configured with other cross-sectional shapes, such as, but not limited to, circular, oval, square, triangular, and hexagon. It is also preferred that in designs with sharp edges, that the edges be radiused (“break edges”) to reduce the likelihood of stress fractures in the rod 26 (or in the bone adjacent the rod). Further, the distal portion 27 of the rod 26 may have a different cross-sectional shape and configuration from the proximal portion 28 of the rod 26. For example, the proximal portion 28 of the rod 26 may have a circular shape with the addition of a ribbed portion on one side to inhibit rotation once in the intramedullary canal in the radius of the patient, while the distal portion 27 of the rod 26 can have an oval or rectangular shape (not shown).



FIG. 7 illustrates another embodiment of an intramedullary fixation device 25′ according to the present invention. In this embodiment, the rod 26 is configured as first and second attachable segments or links 127, 128. As shown, the distal segment 127 of the rod 26 is configured with the head of the rod 26h while the proximal portion 128 is again configured to reside in the medullary canal of the radius shaft. The two segments 127, 128 are configured to align ad mate together to define the rod 26. As shown in FIG. 7, a linking screw 120 is inserted into a threaded aperture 120a that it spans the first and second segments 127, 128 when aligned. Of course, other attachment means or segment link configurations can also be used, such as, but not limited to, bayonet type fittings, friction fit or threaded matable female/male components, and the like.



FIG. 8 illustrates another embodiment of an intramedullary fixation device 25″ for the radius according to the present invention. In this embodiment the rod 26 includes a proximal extension 28ext. As shown, the proximal extension 28ext is tapered adjacent the proximal end portion 28 of the rod 26. The extension 28ext is configured to reside in a more proximal portion of the radius shaft (away from the hand and closer to the elbow). This embodiment may also be used in the absence of a distal radius fracture to treat proximal radius fractures. FIG. 8 also illustrates that the distal fixation member 30 is oriented at about 45 degrees with respect to the axial axis. In any event, this configuration can allow for additional support in the shaft region of the radius (i.e., more proximal “purchase”).



FIG. 9A illustrates a rod 26 having a body with multiple segments or links 127′, 129, 128′. As shown, in this embodiment, the rod 26 is defined by three segments, the distal segment 127′, an intermediate segment 129, and a proximal segment 128′. FIG. 9B illustrates that, in this embodiment, the distal segment 127′ includes a protrusion 127p′ while the upper portion of the intermediate segment 129 includes a recess 129r configured and sized to matably and/or securely receive the protrusion 127p′ therein. Similarly, the proximal segment 128′ includes a recess 128r′ formed therein configured to receive the intermediate segment protrusion 129p therein. Preferably, the segments 127′, 129, 128′ are sized and configured to be held together by a frictional fit of the interlocking or mating components, however, a biocompatible adhesive can also be used, as desired. Other attaching means can also be used to secure the segments together as will be appreciated by those of skill in the art. For example, the protrusion 127p′ can be threaded and configured to threadably engage with a threaded recess 129r formed in the upper portion of the intermediate segment 129. Similarly, the proximal recess 128r′ can be threaded and configured to threadably engage with the intermediate segment 129p protrusion (which can be configured as a correspondingly configured male threaded component).


As shown in FIG. 9C, the intermediate segment 129 can be provided in an assortment of lengths to allow the rod 26 to be adjusted to a desired length according to the anatomical considerations of the patient. Alternatively, the intermediate segment 129 can be a plurality of similarly sized or different, incrementally sized segments. In this way, the distal and proximal segments 127′, 128′ can be provided as standardized-length components with the intermediate segment 129 providing an adjustable length. Thus, the clinician can custom fit the rod 26 at the use site. That is, the clinician can assess the patient and then determine the appropriate number or size of intermediate segments 129 to be used dependant on the length desired. This custom fit does not require the use of a preformed rod or a special order rod. Rather, the fit can be carried out at the clinic, use, or instillation site (proximate in time or contemporaneous with the treatment) to fit the number and size components together according to the needs of the patient. Alternatively, the distal and/or proximal segments 127′, 128′ can also (or alternatively) be configured as or provided in different lengths.



FIG. 10 illustrates the use of an insertion or positioning guide 150 affixed to the distal end portion 27 of the rod 26 to allow for ease of insertion and placement into the patient. As shown, the guide 150 includes an axially (or longitudinally) extending arm 151 which is configured to reside external of the body of the patient when the rod 26 is inserted into the intramedullary canal. As is also shown, the guide arm 151 includes a visual locating, means or visual indicia 153, 155 which correspond to the proximal fixation apertures 25a1, 25a2 to mark or identify the location of the internal apertures when the rod 26 is in a desired position in the patient. This allows the physician to be able to insert the proximal fixation members 35a, 35b in the proper location, aligned with the proximal apertures on the rod 26 held inside the patient.


As shown, the visual indicia 153, 155 is preferably provided as laterally extending drill guides 153, 155 which act to support a drill as it enters the patient and allows the drill to be inserted therein and guided to the desired location to provide bores into the bone on opposing sides of the rod 26 that are aligned with the rod proximal fixation apertures 25a1, 25a2.


Referring to FIG. 12, generally described, to position the intramedullary fixation rod 26 into the patient, an incision is made, such as a sigmoid or longitudinal incision over the radial styloid region of the patient's arm (adjacent to the base of the thumb). As shown in FIG. 13, dissection is carried down to the interval between the first and second dorsal compartments. Care should be taken so as not to injure the branches of the dorsal radial nerve. A small area of exposed bone is present between the first and second compartments (typically covered only by periosteum). As shown in FIGS. 14 and 15A, a small bone window 16 is preferably formed or made into the radius in his area. It may be appropriate to elevate the sheaths of the first and second dorsal compartments to facilitate adequate exposure for the bone window 16. Although shown as a substantially rectangular bone window, other shapes may also be used to provide access to the fracture region.


As shown in FIG. 15w, a finder, sound, or broach-like device 175 can be used prior to inserting the fixation rod 26 into the patient. The device 175 is preferably semi-flexible to follow the contour of the canal in the radius. The device 175 can be inserted through the bone window 16 and about the fracture region and used to determine the size and length of the intramedullary canal and/or to open the canal to a size suitable for receiving the fixation rod 26. The sounds are available in length- and width calibrated sizes to help determine a size and length suitable for the fixation rod 26 according to the particular patient's intramedullary canal structure. As such, the device 175 can bore out or ream and/or define a desired entry and insertion passageway for the device 25, 25′, 25″ in advance of an actual installation into the patient. A fluoroscopic evaluation technique can be used to visualize the insertion of the device 175 and can help determine if the canal needs to be enlarged with a reamer or if a insertion path needs to be formed or shaped.


After the appropriate size and length fixation rod 26 is selected, the rod can be attached to an insertion guide device 150, 150′. FIG. 10 illustrates one embodiment of a guide 150. As shown, an applicator/handle or driver 150 is attached to the rod 26 into the distal aperture 30a). The handle or driver 150 then allows the physician to insert and guide the rod 26 into the desired location in the medullary canal in the radius. Once the head 26h of the rod 26 is positioned below the articular joint surface, in its desired location in the distal radius, the proximal fixation members 35 (35a, 35b) are ready for insertion. Preferably, a small incision (or two) is made at the proximal site of the radius. A drill or driver is inserted into the locator or drill guide holder 152 to align the entry of the proximal fixation member about the proximal aperture 25 and then force the threaded proximal fixation member(s) 35 (35a, 35b) through the bone on the first (dorsal) side of the shaft of the radius, through the rod aperture 25a1, (25a2) and into the bone on the opposing (volar) side of the radial shaft. Preferably, the proximal fixation member 35 (35a, 35b) extends through both sides of the bone. Next, the guide 150 shown in FIG. 10 is removed and the distal fixation member 30 is then inserted into the rod 26 through the distal aperture 30a and attached to the distal radius (FIG. 4). Preferably, the distal fixation member 30 is inserted into the radius at the fracture site or at an exposed site (created by removing a portion of the bone) to allow the head 30h (FIG. 3A) of the distal fixation member 30 to be inserted into the rod 26 such that it rests directly against the body of the rod 26 (either protruding, flush recessed therewith) and extends into the distal fracture fragment 18.



FIGS. 16 and 17 illustrate an additional embodiment of an insertion guide 150′. In this embodiment, the device 150′ includes a rod driver 250 and an interlocking screw attachment guide 151′. Once the proper rod size is identified, the rod 26 is attached to the rod driver 250. The rod driver 250 is attached to the fixation rod 26 via the distal aperture in the head of the rod 26 and an associated attachment member (shown as a screw 30a) and the interlocking screw attachment guide 151′ is attached to the rod driver 250. As for the other guide embodiment described above, the interlocking screw attachment guide 151′ provides a screw guide alignment means such as screw or pin portals 153, 155 to facilitate proper orientation and location of the proximal screws or pins into the patient and into the shaft 25 of the fixation rod 26. Thus, in this embodiment, the span of the screw attachment guide 151′ is configured to provide the proper alignment position relative to the rod driver 250.


As shown in FIGS. 18 and 19, the rod driver 250 of the insertion guide 150′ is used to direct the rod 26 into the intramedullary canal of the patient. The rod driver 250 allows a physician to direct the fixation rod 26 into the radius through the bone window 16. The position of the rod and the reduction of the fracture can be verified by a fluoroscopy unit. Once the rod 26 is in position, a small incision can be made so that the proximal attachment guides 153, 155 can be inserted therein. Traction may be appropriate to reduce the fracture at this time. The proximal attachment members 35a, 35b can then be inserted into the radius after the region has been drilled and/or tapped. Again, the proper positioning of the proximal attachment members 35a, 35b, can be verified by the fluoroscopy unit. The interlocking screw attachment guide 151′ an then be removed from the patient and the rod driver 250. The rod driver 250 can be detached from the fixation rod 26 and the distal fixation member 30 can be inserted into the distal fragment and the fixation rod 26 as shown in FIG. 20.


Routine closure is performed on the incision sites and then, preferably, a long arm cast is applied to the patient. The typical healing process is about six weeks, during which time it is preferred that the treatment area be protected from undue stress and activity.


A rod according to the present invention can be formed from a number of suitable biocompatible materials including titanium, stainless steel, and cobalt chrome. Because the radius is not a weight bearing extremity strength is not as important in this type of fixation rod as it might be in other fixation rod applications.


Surface coatings may also be used as appropriate. For example, as the device 25, 25′, 25″ chronically resides in the body, surface or other treatments may also be applied to, or integrated into, the rod 26 and/or the fixation members 30, 35 to achieve one or more of increased lubricity, low coefficient of friction (each for easier insertion) as well as increased tissue biocompatibility such as resistance to microbial growth and/or configured to reduce the incidence of inflammation or infection during healing. In one embodiment, the rod 26 comprises a material, at least on its exposed surfaces, which can inhibit the growth of undesirable microbial organisms. Preferably, the rod is coated with a biocompatible antimicrobial solution or coating which can inhibit the growth of bacteria, yeast, mold, and fungus. One suitable material may be the antimicrobial silver zeolite based product available from HealthShield Technologies LLC of Wakefield, Mass. Another alternative is a Photolink® Infection Resistance antimicrobial coating or a hemocompatible coating from SurModics, Inc. of Eden Prairie, Minn. The coating may also include other bioactive ingredients (with or without the antimicrobial coating), such as antibiotics, and the like. One product is identified as LubiLAST™ lubricious coatings from AST of Billerica, Mass.


In addition to, or alternatively, a rod according to the present invention can be configured with a biocompatible lubricant or low-friction material to help reduce any discomfort associated with the insertion of the device into the body. Coatings which may be appropriate include coatings which promote lubricity, and wettability. For example, a hydrophilic coating which is applied as a thin (on the order of about 0.5-50 microns thick) layer which is chemically bonded with UV light over the external surface of the rod 26. One such product is a hydrophilic polymer identified as Hydrolene® available from SurModics, Inc., of Eden Prairie, Minn. Other similar products are also available from the same source. Still further, the rod 26 can be configured not only to provide the lubricious coating but to also included bioactive ingredients configured to provide sustained release of antibiotics, anti microbial, and anti-restenosis agents, identified as LubrilLast™ from AST as noted above.



FIG. 11 illustrates the steps of a method for treating a fracture in the radius of a patient according to one embodiment of the present invention. An elongated axially extending rod is inserted into the intramedullary canal of the patient (Block, 210). Proximal fixation members are then secured to the rod to hold the rod in the intramedullary canal attached to the proximately located bone in the radius shaft (Block 220). A distal fixation member is inserted into a distal portion of the rod such that it extends substantially medially or transversely across a distal portion of the radius (Block 230). A bone window may be formed into the radius to define an entry point for the rod (typically the window is formed into a small area of exposed bone which is present between the first and second compartments and covered only by periosteum) in the styloid region adjacent the two bone fragments.


The internal intramedullary radius fixation devices and associated treatment methods of the instant invention can provide improved or alternative treatment options over those conventionally available. The devices and methods of the instant invention may inhibit the collapse in the skeletal structure along the fracture fragment region and may be useful for the osteoporotic patient. The devices of the instant invention can also provide increased structural integrity and/or strength when in position in the distal radius fracture fragment.


The foregoing is illustrative of the present invention and is not to be construed as limiting thereof. Although a few exemplary embodiments of this invention have been described, those skilled in the art will readily appreciate that many modifications are possible in the exemplary embodiments without materially departing from the novel teachings and advantages of this invention. Accordingly, all such modifications are intended to be included within the scope of this invention as defined in the claims. In the claims, means-plus-function clauses, if used, are intended to cover the structures described herein as performing the recited function and not only structural equivalents but also equivalent structures. Therefore, it is to be understood that the foregoing is illustrative of the present invention and is not to be construed as limited to the specific embodiments disclosed, and that modifications to the disclosed embodiments, as well as other embodiments, are intended to be included within the scope of the appended claims. The invention is defined by the following claims, with equivalents of the claims to be included therein.

Claims
  • 1. An intramedullary rod in combination with a cooperating insertion guide for fixation of a distal radius fracture of a patient, comprising: a distal radius intramedullary rod having opposing distal and proximal ends and a curvilinear shape that is substantially similar to a curvature of an intramedullary canal of a human distal radius, wherein the distal end of the rod has a head with at least one laterally extending distal aperture, wherein the head, in an implanted position, is sized and configured to reside entirely within a radial styloid region of the distal radius proximate an articulating surface of the distal radius to affix distal radius fragments associated with the distal radius fracture, and wherein, in the implanted position, the rod is configured and sized to reside entirely within the radius and support and buttress the articular surface of the distal radius and allow wrist mobility while stabilizing the distal radius fracture; andan insertion guide with a curved rod driver releasably attachable to the head of the intramedullary rod, the insertion guide sized and configured to guide the rod into position in a medullary canal, and wherein the insertion guide is sized and configured to enter a lateral entry bone window in at least one distal fracture fragment.
  • 2. The combination of claim 1, further comprising external drill guides extending longitudinally above the insertion guide to reside outside the patient's body when the rod is disposed therein and still attached to the insertion guide, wherein the external drill guides provide visual indicia of alignment corresponding to the location of proximal fixation member apertures in the intramedullary rod in the radius.
  • 3. The combination of claim 1, further comprising a broach-like device with a leading reaming portion configured to enter the lateral entry bone window and extend in a longitudinal direction to follow a contour of the medullary canal to determine a size and length suitable for the rod and bore or ream an insertion passageway for insertion of the rod prior to insertion of the rod.
  • 4. The combination of claim 1, further comprising a distal fixation member that is sized and configured to extend through the laterally extending aperture in the head of the rod and across substantially an entire width of a distal fracture fragment from radial to ulnar regions to provide support to central and ulnar aspects of the distal radius fragment.
  • 5. The combination of claim 4, further comprising at least one proximal member that, in position, laterally extends through an aperture in a proximal portion of the rod in a first transverse direction, and wherein the distal fixation member extends through said laterally extending aperture in a second transverse direction that is offset from the first transverse direction.
  • 6. The combination of claim 4, wherein the distal fixation member includes first and second opposing end portions, the first end portion having a head, wherein the rod has a recess that receives the head so that, in position, the head is substantially flush with an outer surface of the rod.
  • 7. An intramedullary rod in combination with a cooperating insertion guide for fixation of a distal radius fracture of a patient, comprising: a distal radius intramedullary rod having opposing distal and proximal ends and a curvilinear shape that is substantially similar to a curvature of an intramedullary canal of a human distal radius, wherein the distal end of the rod has a head with at least one laterally extending distal aperture, wherein the rod, in an implanted position, is sized and configured to reside entirely in the radius with the head totally within a radial styloid region proximate an articulating surface of the distal radius to affix distal radius fragments associated with the distal radius fracture and is configured and sized to support and buttress the articular surface of the distal radius and allow wrist mobility while stabilizing the distal radius fracture;an insertion guide with a curved rod driver releasably attachable to the head of the intramedullary rod, the insertion guide sized and configured to guide the rod into position in a medullary canal, and wherein the insertion guide is sized and configured to enter a lateral entry bone window in at least one distal fracture fragment, wherein the insertion guide is attached to the rod via an attachment member inserted into the laterally extending distal aperture; andan implantable distal fixation member that engages the distal aperture of the head after the insertion guide is released from the rod.
  • 8. The combination of claim 7, wherein the attachment member is threaded, and wherein the insertion guide comprises an aperture that aligns with the distal aperture of the rod with the attachment member that is threaded extending through both the rod and guide apertures.
  • 9. The combination of claim 7, wherein the laterally extending rod distal aperture angles down in a direction away from the bone window.
  • 10. The combination of claim 7, wherein, in the implanted position, the distal fixation member extends through the laterally extending distal aperture of the head and beyond the perimeter of the rod to reside across at least a major portion of the radius in a metaphyseal region so that and the distal fixation member is configured and sized to reside within the radius of the patient, and wherein the rod and the distal fixation member are configured to hold the fracture fragments together while buttressing the distal radius articular region without an external fixation member.
  • 11. The combination of claim 7, wherein the insertion guide has opposing proximal and distal end portions, with a handle extending from the distal end portion and an alignment member that longitudinally extends in direction away from the handle above the guide outside the patient's body to reside above the proximal end portion of the rod, and wherein the alignment member is substantially rigid with proximal apertures configured to define the location of proximal apertures extending through the rod inside the patient's body.
  • 12. An intramedullary rod in combination with a cooperating insertion guide for fixation of a distal radius fracture of a patient, comprising: a distal radius intramedullary rod having opposing distal and proximal ends and a curvilinear shape that is substantially similar to a curvature of an intramedullary canal of a human distal radius, wherein the distal end of the rod has a head with at least one laterally extending distal aperture, wherein an implanted position, is sized and configured to reside in a distal radius fracture fragment within a radial styloid region of the distal radius proximate an articulating surface of the distal radius to affix distal radius fragments associated with the distal radius fracture, and wherein, in the implanted position, the rod is configured and sized to support and buttress the articular surface of the distal radius and allow wrist mobility while stabilizing the distal radius fracture; andan insertion guide with a curved rod driver releasably attachable to the head of the intramedullary rod, the insertion guide sized and configured to guide the rod into position in a medullary canal, and wherein the insertion guide is sized and configured to enter a lateral entry bone window in at least one distal fracture fragment,wherein the rod has a plurality of proximal apertures that extend through the rod in a transverse direction, the transverse direction of each proximal aperture being offset from a transverse direction of the distal aperture.
  • 13. The combination of claim 12, further comprising: a distal fixation member configured to extend through the distal laterally extending aperture of the rod; anda plurality of proximal fixation members, respective ones of which extend through a respective proximal aperture in the rod, whereby the rod and the at least one distal fixation member are is configured and sized to stabilize the distal radius fracture and allow wrist mobility.
  • 14. The combination of claim 13, wherein, in position, the rod head and the distal fixation member are configured and sized to reside entirely within the radius of the patient and wherein the combination is devoid of an external fixation member.
  • 15. The combination of claim 14, wherein the rod has a distal end that is tapered across a width thereof, and wherein the distal fixation member has a head that is recessed into the rod and has a length that is sized and configured to extend through the laterally extending distal aperture of the rod and over at least a major portion of the radius in a metaphyeal region.
  • 16. The combination of claim 14, wherein the entire distal radius rod and the distal fixation member are sized and configured to repair the distal radius fracture without an external fixation member, and wherein the curvature of the device is substantially concave in a direction corresponding to a radial aspect of the distal radius.
  • 17. An intramedullary rod for fixation of a distal radius fracture of a patient in combination with an insertion guide, the combination comprising: a distal radius intramedullary rod having an elongate curvilinear shape with opposing distal and proximal ends, wherein, in an implanted position, the rod resides entirely within the radius with the distal end sized and configured to reside totally inside a radial styloid region of the distal radius proximate an articulating surface of the distal radius, wherein the rod distal end has a head that includes a laterally extending aperture, wherein, in the implanted position, the rod is configured and sized to support and buttress the articular surface of the distal radius and allow wrist mobility while stabilizing the distal radius fracture; andan insertion guide releasably attachable to the intramedullary rod laterally extending aperture in the head, the insertion guide sized and configured to guide the rod into position in a medullary canal, and wherein the insertion guide is sized and configured to enter a lateral entry bone window in the distal radius.
  • 18. The combination of claim 17, wherein the rod curvilinear shape is substantially similar to a curvature of an intramedullary canal of a human distal radius with the distal end tapering laterally downward toward an ulna aspect in a direction away from the radial styloid region.
  • 19. The combination of claim 17, further comprising: a distal fixation member that, when in an implanted position, extends through the laterally extending distal aperture of the head and beyond a perimeter of the rod to reside across a major portion of the radius in a metaphyseal region so that the distal fixation member is configured and sized to reside within the radius of the patient, and wherein the rod and the distal fixation member are configured to hold distal radius fracture fragments together while buttressing the distal radius articular region without an external fixation member; andat least one proximal member that, in position, laterally extends through an aperture in a proximal portion of the rod in a first transverse direction, and wherein the at least one distal fixation member extends through the laterally extending distal aperture in a second transverse direction that is offset from the first transverse direction.
  • 20. The combination of claim 19, wherein the distal fixation member includes first and second opposing end portions, the first end portion having a head, wherein the rod has a recess that receives the head so that, in position, the head is substantially flush with an outer surface of the rod.
  • 21. The combination of claim 17, wherein a distal end of the rod is sized and configured to affix distal radius fragments associated with the distal radius fracture.
RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/377,255, filed Feb. 28, 2003 now U.S. Pat. No. 7,160,302, which is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 09/668,941 now U.S. Pat. No. 6,527,775, filed Sep. 22, 2000, the contents of which are hereby incorporated by reference as recited in full herein.

US Referenced Citations (238)
Number Name Date Kind
2500370 McKibbin Mar 1950 A
2682265 Collision Jun 1954 A
3334624 Schneider et al. Aug 1967 A
3433220 Zickel Mar 1969 A
3709218 Halloran Jan 1973 A
3741205 Markolf et al. Jun 1973 A
3760802 Fischer et al. Sep 1973 A
3781917 Mathys Jan 1974 A
3939498 Lee et al. Feb 1976 A
3973278 Shersher Aug 1976 A
3977398 Burstein Aug 1976 A
4011863 Zickel et al. Mar 1977 A
4055172 Ender et al. Oct 1977 A
4091806 Aginsky May 1978 A
4101985 Baumann et al. Jul 1978 A
4103683 Neufeld Aug 1978 A
4135507 Harris et al. Jan 1979 A
4169470 Ender et al. Oct 1979 A
4227518 Aginsky Oct 1980 A
4237875 Termanini Dec 1980 A
4338926 Kummer Jul 1982 A
4393868 Teague Jul 1983 A
4423721 Otte et al. Jan 1984 A
4446857 Otte et al. May 1984 A
4453539 Raftopoulos et al. Jun 1984 A
4467793 Ender Aug 1984 A
4473069 Kolmert Sep 1984 A
4475545 Ender Oct 1984 A
4483335 Tornier Nov 1984 A
4493317 Klaue Jan 1985 A
4503847 Mouradian Mar 1985 A
4513744 Klaue Apr 1985 A
4522202 Otte et al. Jun 1985 A
4541424 Grosse et al. Sep 1985 A
4590930 Kurth et al. May 1986 A
4622959 Marcus et al. Nov 1986 A
4630601 Harder et al. Dec 1986 A
4667663 Miyata May 1987 A
4697585 Williams Oct 1987 A
4705027 Klaue Nov 1987 A
4712541 Harder et al. Dec 1987 A
4733654 Marino Mar 1988 A
4775381 Tari et al. Oct 1988 A
4776330 Chapman et al. Oct 1988 A
4781181 Tanguy Nov 1988 A
4794919 Nilsson Jan 1989 A
4805607 Engelhardt et al. Feb 1989 A
4846162 Moehring Jul 1989 A
4854312 Raftopouls et al. Aug 1989 A
4858602 Seidel et al. Aug 1989 A
4875474 Border Oct 1989 A
4875475 Comte et al. Oct 1989 A
4877019 Vives Oct 1989 A
4881535 Sohngen Nov 1989 A
4911153 Border Mar 1990 A
4943291 Tanguy Jul 1990 A
4944764 Stossel Jul 1990 A
4946459 Bradshaw et al. Aug 1990 A
4976258 Richter et al. Dec 1990 A
4976714 Aghion Dec 1990 A
4998912 Scarbrough et al. Mar 1991 A
5013314 Firica et al. May 1991 A
5035697 Frigg Jul 1991 A
5041115 Frigg et al. Aug 1991 A
5057103 Davis Oct 1991 A
5057110 Kranz et al. Oct 1991 A
5066296 Chapman et al. Nov 1991 A
5084053 Ender Jan 1992 A
5100404 Hayes Mar 1992 A
5122141 Simpson et al. Jun 1992 A
5122146 Chapman et al. Jun 1992 A
5135527 Ender Aug 1992 A
5167666 Mattheck et al. Dec 1992 A
5190543 Schlapfer Mar 1993 A
5197966 Sommerkamp Mar 1993 A
5201735 Chapman et al. Apr 1993 A
5211645 Baumgart et al. May 1993 A
5239569 Saleh et al. Aug 1993 A
5248313 Greene et al. Sep 1993 A
5263955 Baumgart et al. Nov 1993 A
5268000 Ottieri et al. Dec 1993 A
5281224 Faccioli et al. Jan 1994 A
5295991 Frigg Mar 1994 A
5300074 Frigg Apr 1994 A
5334192 Behrens Aug 1994 A
5352228 Kummer et al. Oct 1994 A
5356410 Pennig Oct 1994 A
5364399 Lowery et al. Nov 1994 A
5375956 Pennig Dec 1994 A
5397328 Behrens et al. Mar 1995 A
5411503 Hollstien et al. May 1995 A
5415660 Campbell et al. May 1995 A
5429638 Muschler et al. Jul 1995 A
5433718 Brinker Jul 1995 A
5441500 Seidel et al. Aug 1995 A
5443466 Shah Aug 1995 A
5458654 Tepic Oct 1995 A
5472444 Huebner et al. Dec 1995 A
5484438 Pennig Jan 1996 A
5499986 Dimarco Mar 1996 A
5536269 Spievack Jul 1996 A
5549610 Russell et al. Aug 1996 A
5569262 Carney Oct 1996 A
5571103 Bailey Nov 1996 A
5573536 Grosse et al. Nov 1996 A
5578035 Lin Nov 1996 A
5586985 Putnam et al. Dec 1996 A
5618286 Brinker Apr 1997 A
5620445 Brosnahan et al. Apr 1997 A
5620449 Faccioli et al. Apr 1997 A
5626579 Muschler et al. May 1997 A
5643258 Robioneck et al. Jul 1997 A
5645545 Bryant Jul 1997 A
5653709 Frigg Aug 1997 A
5658283 Huebner Aug 1997 A
5658287 Hofmann et al. Aug 1997 A
5665086 Itoman et al. Sep 1997 A
5681318 Pennig et al. Oct 1997 A
5690634 Muller et al. Nov 1997 A
5697930 Itoman et al. Dec 1997 A
5697934 Huebner Dec 1997 A
5713901 Tock Feb 1998 A
5713902 Friedl Feb 1998 A
5718704 Medoff Feb 1998 A
5766174 Perry Jun 1998 A
5766179 Faccioli et al. Jun 1998 A
5766180 Winquist Jun 1998 A
5776194 Mikol et al. Jul 1998 A
5779705 Matthews Jul 1998 A
5800437 Gustilo et al. Sep 1998 A
5853413 Carter et al. Dec 1998 A
5928235 Friedl Jul 1999 A
5941878 Medoff Aug 1999 A
5954722 Bono Sep 1999 A
5961553 Coty et al. Oct 1999 A
5976134 Huebner Nov 1999 A
5997490 McLeod et al. Dec 1999 A
6001101 Augagneur et al. Dec 1999 A
6010505 Asche et al. Jan 2000 A
6010506 Gosney et al. Jan 2000 A
6019761 Gustilo Feb 2000 A
6022349 McLeod et al. Feb 2000 A
6027506 Faccioli et al. Feb 2000 A
6033407 Behrens Mar 2000 A
6056755 Horas et al. May 2000 A
6074392 Durham Jun 2000 A
6077264 Chemello Jun 2000 A
6080159 Vichard Jun 2000 A
6093192 Abel Jul 2000 A
6096040 Esser Aug 2000 A
6120504 Brumback et al. Sep 2000 A
6123708 Kilpela et al. Sep 2000 A
6123709 Jones Sep 2000 A
6126661 Faccioli et al. Oct 2000 A
6146384 Lee et al. Nov 2000 A
6200321 Orbay et al. Mar 2001 B1
6206880 Karladani Mar 2001 B1
6221073 Weiss et al. Apr 2001 B1
6221074 Cole et al. Apr 2001 B1
6224601 Friedl May 2001 B1
6228086 Wahl et al. May 2001 B1
6231576 Frigg et al. May 2001 B1
6245075 Betz et al. Jun 2001 B1
6248109 Stoffella Jun 2001 B1
6261289 Levy Jul 2001 B1
6270499 Leu et al. Aug 2001 B1
6273892 Orbay et al. Aug 2001 B1
6283969 Grusin et al. Sep 2001 B1
6296645 Hover et al. Oct 2001 B1
6319253 Ackeret et al. Nov 2001 B1
6355069 DeCarlo et al. Mar 2002 B1
6358250 Orbay Mar 2002 B1
6364882 Orbay Apr 2002 B1
6379359 Dahners Apr 2002 B1
6379360 Ackeret et al. Apr 2002 B1
6383185 Baumgart May 2002 B1
6387098 Cole et al. May 2002 B1
6395033 Pepper May 2002 B1
6402753 Cole et al. Jun 2002 B1
6409768 Tepic et al. Jun 2002 B1
6416516 Stauch et al. Jul 2002 B1
6423066 Harder et al. Jul 2002 B1
6440135 Orbay et al. Aug 2002 B2
6443954 Bramlet et al. Sep 2002 B1
6461360 Adam Oct 2002 B1
6488684 Bramlet et al. Dec 2002 B2
6508819 Orbay Jan 2003 B1
6508820 Bales Jan 2003 B2
6514253 Yao Feb 2003 B1
6524313 Fassir et al. Feb 2003 B1
6524314 Dean et al. Feb 2003 B1
6527775 Warburton Mar 2003 B1
6533788 Orbay Mar 2003 B1
6547791 Buhren et al. Apr 2003 B1
6554833 Levy et al. Apr 2003 B2
6572620 Schon et al. Jun 2003 B1
6579294 Robioneck Jun 2003 B2
6607531 Frigg Aug 2003 B2
6629976 Gnos et al. Oct 2003 B1
6648889 Bramlet et al. Nov 2003 B2
6652529 Swanson Nov 2003 B2
6658189 Ajima et al. Dec 2003 B2
6660009 Azar Dec 2003 B1
6702823 Iaia Mar 2004 B2
6706046 Orbay et al. Mar 2004 B2
6709436 Hover et al. Mar 2004 B1
6730087 Butsch May 2004 B1
6730090 Orbay et al. May 2004 B2
6736818 Perren et al. May 2004 B2
6755862 Keynan Jun 2004 B2
6767351 Orbay et al. Jul 2004 B2
6786908 Hover et al. Sep 2004 B2
6793659 Putnam Sep 2004 B2
6796984 Soubeiran Sep 2004 B2
6808527 Lower et al. Oct 2004 B2
6866665 Orbay Mar 2005 B2
6893444 Orbay May 2005 B2
6926720 Castaneda Aug 2005 B2
7008425 Philips Mar 2006 B2
7018380 Cole Mar 2006 B2
7033365 Powell et al. Apr 2006 B2
7041104 Cole et al. May 2006 B1
7066943 Zirkle, Jr. Jun 2006 B2
7247156 Ekholm et al. Jul 2007 B2
20010011172 Orbay et al. Aug 2001 A1
20020032446 Orbay Mar 2002 A1
20020143337 Orbay et al. Oct 2002 A1
20020143338 Orbay et al. Oct 2002 A1
20020156474 Wack et al. Oct 2002 A1
20020183753 Manderson Dec 2002 A1
20030055428 Swanson Mar 2003 A1
20030069581 Stinson et al. Apr 2003 A1
20030073999 Putnam Apr 2003 A1
20030083660 Orbay May 2003 A1
20030083661 Orbay et al. May 2003 A1
20030105461 Putnam Jun 2003 A1
20060015101 Warburton et al. Jan 2006 A1
20060015123 Fencl et al. Jan 2006 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (16)
Number Date Country
7115713 Jun 1975 DE
0091499 Oct 1983 EP
0118778 Mar 1987 EP
0491138 Oct 1991 EP
0 649 289 May 1992 EP
0547380 Jun 1993 EP
1 095 626 May 2001 EP
1330988 Jul 2003 EP
2586554 Aug 1985 FR
2668360 Oct 1990 FR
1428653 Mar 1976 GB
WO 9818397 May 1998 WO
WO 0156452 Jan 2001 WO
WO 0156452 Aug 2001 WO
WO 03037160 Oct 2002 WO
WO 03037160 May 2003 WO
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20060200143 A1 Sep 2006 US
Continuations (2)
Number Date Country
Parent 10377255 Feb 2003 US
Child 11381227 US
Parent 09668941 Sep 2000 US
Child 10377255 US