This invention relates to devices and methods for treating distal radius fractures.
Distal radius fractures are among the most common type of bone fracture of the upper extremities. The distal radius fracture is often called a “Colles” fracture (named after a 19th Century British surgeon who described the fracture). The Colles fracture is associated with a fracture of a distal tip or distal end portion of the radius.
Distal radius fractures are, unfortunately, most common in the elderly segment of the population. This is because the elderly tend to exhibit some degree of bone density loss or osteoporotic condition making their bones more susceptible to injury. Indeed, just as osteoporosis is known to affect women more often and more severely than men, distal radius fractures are much more common in females than males, typically on the order of about 20:1. Distal radius fractures generally occur as a result of a fall, because the patient tends to brace for the fall by outstretching the hand which then fractures upon impact, at the distal radius at or adjacent the wrist.
As shown in
Distal radius fractures can be difficult to treat, particularly in the older osteoporotic patient. Conventionally, this type of fracture has been treated by a closed (non-surgical) reduction and application of a splint (such as a plaster compression dressing) or a cast (typically circular plaster or fiberglass). Unfortunately, primarily because of the patient's osteoporosis, during the healing process, and despite the splint/cast immobilization, the fracture fragments can settle, potentially causing a collapse at the fracture line in the distal radius.
Treatment options for a collapsed distal radius fracture are relatively limited. The primary conventional treatments include the use of devices which can be characterized as either external fixation devices or internal fixation devices. External fixation devices are those that stabilize a fracture through the use of percutaneous pins which typically affix one or more bone portions to an external (anchoring or stabilizing) device. Internal fixation devices are those devices which are configured to reside entirely within the subject (internal to the body). Percutaneous pins can be used alone, without anchoring devices, for fixation of Colles type fractures. The use of external devices has conventionally been thought to be particularly indicated in cases of bone toss to preserve skeletal length as noted, for example, in U.S. Pat. No. 5,571,103 to Bailey at col. 1, lines 35-43. However, such devices can be bulky, cumbersome, and or invasive to the user or patient. Further the external fixation devices may not be suitable for use in soft osteoporotic bone.
In view of the foregoing, there remains a need for improved distal radius fracture treatment devices and techniques.
In a preferred embodiment the present invention provides methods and devices for treating fractures in or adjacent the wrist and distal forearm. The present invention is particularly useful for stabilizing and treating distal radius fractures of a patient. The devices and methods of the present invention employs an intramedullary interlocking fixation rod (i.e, it interlocks the distal and proximal fracture fragments together) to stabilize the skeletal structure in a manner which can inhibit the amount of collapse or loss in skeletal length exhibited by a patient with a distal radius fracture. The devices and methods of the present invention may be especially useful for treating distal radius fractures in subjects with osteoporosis.
One aspect of the invention is a method for treating a distal radius fracture of a patient comprising the use of an internal fixation rod. As noted above, the radius anatomically has an articular joint surfaces a metaphysis region, a shaft portion and a medullary canal associated therewith. The distal radius fracture has a fracture line which divides the radius into a distal fracture fragment portion and a proximal fracture fragment portion. The distal fragment portion includes the distal end of the radius proximate the articular joint surface, and the distal portion of the fracture has a width thereacross. The method comprises the steps of: (a) installing an elongated rod having opposing proximal and distal portions into the medullary canal of the patient such that the proximal portion of the rod resides above the fracture line (closer to the elbow) and the distal portion of the rod resides below the fracture line (closer to the hand); (b) securing a distal fixation member to the elongated rod and into the distal end portion of the radius at a location which is below the fracture line such that the distal fixation member extends internal of the patient substantially laterally across a portion of the width of the distal fracture fragment; and (c) anchoring the elongated rod inside the medullary canal of the radius at a location which is above (distal to) the fracture line.
Another aspect of the present invention is an internal fixation device for eating or repairing distal radius fractures having a fracture line forming distal and proximal fracture fragments. The radius is anatomically configured with a distal articular joint surface, a metaphysis region, a shaft, and a medullary canal. The anatomic position of the hand is palm forward or front such that the medial orientation is next to the body (fifth finger or ulna side of hand) and the lateral orientation is away from the body (thumb or radial side). Generally stated, the distal portion of the radius has a width which extends across (a major portion of) the arm from the medial side to the lateral side. The device includes an elongated fixation rod having opposing proximal and distal portions. The distal portion includes a head with a laterally extending distal aperture formed therein, and the proximal portion comprises at least one proximal aperture formed therein. The elongated fixation rod proximal portion is sized and configured such that, in position, it resides in the shaft inside a portion of the medullary canal of the radius of a patient. The device also includes a distal fixation member configured to enter the distal aperture and attach to the rod and the distal fracture fragment to hold the distal portion of the rod to the distal fracture fragment. The device further includes at least one proximal fixation member, a respective one for each of the at least one proximal apertures. The proximal fixation member is configured to secure the lower portion of the fixation rod to the radius at a position which is distal to the fracture line. In position, the elongated fixation rod is configured to reside within the radius, and the distal fixation member and the at least one proximal fixation member are configured to reside internal of the body of the patient.
In a preferred embodiment, the elongated fixation rod has a curvilinear profile. The curvilinear profile includes a distal curve portion at the distal portion of the device. The distal curve portion is adapted to accommodate the radial styloid region of the radius proximate the articular joint surface. The rod can also be provided as a plurality of segments matable or attachable. In one embodiment an intermediate segment can be provided in different lengths to allow for the adjustment of length according to a patient's anatomical considerations. Of course, the rod can be a unitary body provided in a number of standard sizes preferably statistically representative of the treatment population.
The foregoing and other objects and aspects of the present invention are explained in detail in the specification set forth below.
The present invention will now be described more fully hereinafter with reference to the accompanying figures, in which preferred embodiments of the invention are shown. This invention may, however, be embodied in many different forms and should not be construed as limited to the embodiments set forth herein. Like numbers refer to like elements throughout. In the figures, certain layers, regions, or components may be exaggerated for clarity.
As shown in
As shown, the distal fixation member 30 is configured to enter and extend through and beyond the distal aperture 30a to engage with the distal fracture fragment 18 and secure the rod 26 and the distal fracture fragment 18 theretogether. Preferably, the distal fixation member 30 is sized to extend across a major portion of the width of the distal fracture fragment 18. More preferably, the distal fixation member 30 is sized with a length which is sufficient to extend across substantially all of the fracture fragment 18 so as to provide support for the radial, center, and ulna aspects of the distal fracture fragment 18 (the ulna aspect being the part of the fracture fragment adjacent or proximate the ulna 14 while the radial aspect being the portion of the fracture fragment on the opposing side of the view shown in
In one embodiment, as shown in
In a preferred embodiment, the rod 26 is configured with a profile 26p which is curvilinear when viewed from the anterior-posterior view, as shown, for example, in
It is additionally referred that the distal aperture 30a be formed in the rod 26 such that it allows the distal fixation member 30 to extend therethrough and reside at a position which is angularly offset tore the axial is. As show in
In this embodiment, the head 26h of the rod 26 can buttress the distal radius region and increase the structural effectiveness of the rod. Thus, together with the proper positioning of the distal portion 27 of the rod 26 in the distal radius and/or the medial extension of the distal fixation member 30, the head 26h, can reinforce or positively affect the structural integrity of the device to help support the radial styloid region of the distal fracture fragment.
Referring again to
As shown in
In position, the rod 26 is configured such that it also extends through a portion of the medullary canal to terminate therein in the shaft region 13 of the radius 10 (
As shown in
As shown in
As shown, the visual indicia 153, 155 is preferably provided as laterally extending drill guides 153, 155 which act to support a drill as it enters the patient and allows the drill to be inserted therein and guided to the desired location to provide bores into the bone on opposing sides of the rod 26 that are aligned with the rod proximal fixation apertures 25a1, 25a2.
Referring to
As shown in
After the appropriate size and length fixation rod 26 is selected, the rod can be attached to an insertion guide device 150, 150′.
As shown in
Routine closure is performed on the incision sites and then, preferably, a long arm cast is applied to the patient. The typical healing process is about six weeks, during which time it is preferred that the treatment area be protected from undue stress and activity.
A rod according to the present invention can be formed from a number of suitable biocompatible materials including titanium, stainless steel, and cobalt chrome. Because the radius is not a weight bearing extremity strength is not as important in this type of fixation rod as it might be in other fixation rod applications.
Surface coatings may also be used as appropriate. For example, as the device 25, 25′, 25″ chronically resides in the body, surface or other treatments may also be applied to, or integrated into, the rod 26 and/or the fixation members 30, 35 to achieve one or more of increased lubricity, low coefficient of friction (each for easier insertion) as well as increased tissue biocompatibility such as resistance to microbial growth and/or configured to reduce the incidence of inflammation or infection during healing. In one embodiment, the rod 26 comprises a material, at least on its exposed surfaces, which can inhibit the growth of undesirable microbial organisms. Preferably, the rod is coated with a biocompatible antimicrobial solution or coating which can inhibit the growth of bacteria, yeast, mold, and fungus. One suitable material may be the antimicrobial silver zeolite based product available from HealthShield Technologies LLC of Wakefield, Mass. Another alternative is a Photolink® Infection Resistance antimicrobial coating or a hemocompatible coating from SurModics, Inc. of Eden Prairie, Minn. The coating may also include other bioactive ingredients (with or without the antimicrobial coating), such as antibiotics, and the like. One product is identified as LubiLAST™ lubricious coatings from AST of Billerica, Mass.
In addition to, or alternatively, a rod according to the present invention can be configured with a biocompatible lubricant or low-friction material to help reduce any discomfort associated with the insertion of the device into the body. Coatings which may be appropriate include coatings which promote lubricity, and wettability. For example, a hydrophilic coating which is applied as a thin (on the order of about 0.5-50 microns thick) layer which is chemically bonded with UV light over the external surface of the rod 26. One such product is a hydrophilic polymer identified as Hydrolene® available from SurModics, Inc., of Eden Prairie, Minn. Other similar products are also available from the same source. Still further, the rod 26 can be configured not only to provide the lubricious coating but to also included bioactive ingredients configured to provide sustained release of antibiotics, anti microbial, and anti-restenosis agents, identified as LubrilLast™ from AST as noted above.
The internal intramedullary radius fixation devices and associated treatment methods of the instant invention can provide improved or alternative treatment options over those conventionally available. The devices and methods of the instant invention may inhibit the collapse in the skeletal structure along the fracture fragment region and may be useful for the osteoporotic patient. The devices of the instant invention can also provide increased structural integrity and/or strength when in position in the distal radius fracture fragment.
The foregoing is illustrative of the present invention and is not to be construed as limiting thereof. Although a few exemplary embodiments of this invention have been described, those skilled in the art will readily appreciate that many modifications are possible in the exemplary embodiments without materially departing from the novel teachings and advantages of this invention. Accordingly, all such modifications are intended to be included within the scope of this invention as defined in the claims. In the claims, means-plus-function clauses, if used, are intended to cover the structures described herein as performing the recited function and not only structural equivalents but also equivalent structures. Therefore, it is to be understood that the foregoing is illustrative of the present invention and is not to be construed as limited to the specific embodiments disclosed, and that modifications to the disclosed embodiments, as well as other embodiments, are intended to be included within the scope of the appended claims. The invention is defined by the following claims, with equivalents of the claims to be included therein.
This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/377,255, filed Feb. 28, 2003 now U.S. Pat. No. 7,160,302, which is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 09/668,941 now U.S. Pat. No. 6,527,775, filed Sep. 22, 2000, the contents of which are hereby incorporated by reference as recited in full herein.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2500370 | McKibbin | Mar 1950 | A |
2682265 | Collision | Jun 1954 | A |
3334624 | Schneider et al. | Aug 1967 | A |
3433220 | Zickel | Mar 1969 | A |
3709218 | Halloran | Jan 1973 | A |
3741205 | Markolf et al. | Jun 1973 | A |
3760802 | Fischer et al. | Sep 1973 | A |
3781917 | Mathys | Jan 1974 | A |
3939498 | Lee et al. | Feb 1976 | A |
3973278 | Shersher | Aug 1976 | A |
3977398 | Burstein | Aug 1976 | A |
4011863 | Zickel et al. | Mar 1977 | A |
4055172 | Ender et al. | Oct 1977 | A |
4091806 | Aginsky | May 1978 | A |
4101985 | Baumann et al. | Jul 1978 | A |
4103683 | Neufeld | Aug 1978 | A |
4135507 | Harris et al. | Jan 1979 | A |
4169470 | Ender et al. | Oct 1979 | A |
4227518 | Aginsky | Oct 1980 | A |
4237875 | Termanini | Dec 1980 | A |
4338926 | Kummer | Jul 1982 | A |
4393868 | Teague | Jul 1983 | A |
4423721 | Otte et al. | Jan 1984 | A |
4446857 | Otte et al. | May 1984 | A |
4453539 | Raftopoulos et al. | Jun 1984 | A |
4467793 | Ender | Aug 1984 | A |
4473069 | Kolmert | Sep 1984 | A |
4475545 | Ender | Oct 1984 | A |
4483335 | Tornier | Nov 1984 | A |
4493317 | Klaue | Jan 1985 | A |
4503847 | Mouradian | Mar 1985 | A |
4513744 | Klaue | Apr 1985 | A |
4522202 | Otte et al. | Jun 1985 | A |
4541424 | Grosse et al. | Sep 1985 | A |
4590930 | Kurth et al. | May 1986 | A |
4622959 | Marcus et al. | Nov 1986 | A |
4630601 | Harder et al. | Dec 1986 | A |
4667663 | Miyata | May 1987 | A |
4697585 | Williams | Oct 1987 | A |
4705027 | Klaue | Nov 1987 | A |
4712541 | Harder et al. | Dec 1987 | A |
4733654 | Marino | Mar 1988 | A |
4775381 | Tari et al. | Oct 1988 | A |
4776330 | Chapman et al. | Oct 1988 | A |
4781181 | Tanguy | Nov 1988 | A |
4794919 | Nilsson | Jan 1989 | A |
4805607 | Engelhardt et al. | Feb 1989 | A |
4846162 | Moehring | Jul 1989 | A |
4854312 | Raftopouls et al. | Aug 1989 | A |
4858602 | Seidel et al. | Aug 1989 | A |
4875474 | Border | Oct 1989 | A |
4875475 | Comte et al. | Oct 1989 | A |
4877019 | Vives | Oct 1989 | A |
4881535 | Sohngen | Nov 1989 | A |
4911153 | Border | Mar 1990 | A |
4943291 | Tanguy | Jul 1990 | A |
4944764 | Stossel | Jul 1990 | A |
4946459 | Bradshaw et al. | Aug 1990 | A |
4976258 | Richter et al. | Dec 1990 | A |
4976714 | Aghion | Dec 1990 | A |
4998912 | Scarbrough et al. | Mar 1991 | A |
5013314 | Firica et al. | May 1991 | A |
5035697 | Frigg | Jul 1991 | A |
5041115 | Frigg et al. | Aug 1991 | A |
5057103 | Davis | Oct 1991 | A |
5057110 | Kranz et al. | Oct 1991 | A |
5066296 | Chapman et al. | Nov 1991 | A |
5084053 | Ender | Jan 1992 | A |
5100404 | Hayes | Mar 1992 | A |
5122141 | Simpson et al. | Jun 1992 | A |
5122146 | Chapman et al. | Jun 1992 | A |
5135527 | Ender | Aug 1992 | A |
5167666 | Mattheck et al. | Dec 1992 | A |
5190543 | Schlapfer | Mar 1993 | A |
5197966 | Sommerkamp | Mar 1993 | A |
5201735 | Chapman et al. | Apr 1993 | A |
5211645 | Baumgart et al. | May 1993 | A |
5239569 | Saleh et al. | Aug 1993 | A |
5248313 | Greene et al. | Sep 1993 | A |
5263955 | Baumgart et al. | Nov 1993 | A |
5268000 | Ottieri et al. | Dec 1993 | A |
5281224 | Faccioli et al. | Jan 1994 | A |
5295991 | Frigg | Mar 1994 | A |
5300074 | Frigg | Apr 1994 | A |
5334192 | Behrens | Aug 1994 | A |
5352228 | Kummer et al. | Oct 1994 | A |
5356410 | Pennig | Oct 1994 | A |
5364399 | Lowery et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
5375956 | Pennig | Dec 1994 | A |
5397328 | Behrens et al. | Mar 1995 | A |
5411503 | Hollstien et al. | May 1995 | A |
5415660 | Campbell et al. | May 1995 | A |
5429638 | Muschler et al. | Jul 1995 | A |
5433718 | Brinker | Jul 1995 | A |
5441500 | Seidel et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
5443466 | Shah | Aug 1995 | A |
5458654 | Tepic | Oct 1995 | A |
5472444 | Huebner et al. | Dec 1995 | A |
5484438 | Pennig | Jan 1996 | A |
5499986 | Dimarco | Mar 1996 | A |
5536269 | Spievack | Jul 1996 | A |
5549610 | Russell et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5569262 | Carney | Oct 1996 | A |
5571103 | Bailey | Nov 1996 | A |
5573536 | Grosse et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
5578035 | Lin | Nov 1996 | A |
5586985 | Putnam et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5618286 | Brinker | Apr 1997 | A |
5620445 | Brosnahan et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5620449 | Faccioli et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5626579 | Muschler et al. | May 1997 | A |
5643258 | Robioneck et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5645545 | Bryant | Jul 1997 | A |
5653709 | Frigg | Aug 1997 | A |
5658283 | Huebner | Aug 1997 | A |
5658287 | Hofmann et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
5665086 | Itoman et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5681318 | Pennig et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
5690634 | Muller et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
5697930 | Itoman et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5697934 | Huebner | Dec 1997 | A |
5713901 | Tock | Feb 1998 | A |
5713902 | Friedl | Feb 1998 | A |
5718704 | Medoff | Feb 1998 | A |
5766174 | Perry | Jun 1998 | A |
5766179 | Faccioli et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5766180 | Winquist | Jun 1998 | A |
5776194 | Mikol et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5779705 | Matthews | Jul 1998 | A |
5800437 | Gustilo et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5853413 | Carter et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5928235 | Friedl | Jul 1999 | A |
5941878 | Medoff | Aug 1999 | A |
5954722 | Bono | Sep 1999 | A |
5961553 | Coty et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5976134 | Huebner | Nov 1999 | A |
5997490 | McLeod et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6001101 | Augagneur et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6010505 | Asche et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6010506 | Gosney et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6019761 | Gustilo | Feb 2000 | A |
6022349 | McLeod et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6027506 | Faccioli et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6033407 | Behrens | Mar 2000 | A |
6056755 | Horas et al. | May 2000 | A |
6074392 | Durham | Jun 2000 | A |
6077264 | Chemello | Jun 2000 | A |
6080159 | Vichard | Jun 2000 | A |
6093192 | Abel | Jul 2000 | A |
6096040 | Esser | Aug 2000 | A |
6120504 | Brumback et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6123708 | Kilpela et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6123709 | Jones | Sep 2000 | A |
6126661 | Faccioli et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6146384 | Lee et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6200321 | Orbay et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6206880 | Karladani | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6221073 | Weiss et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6221074 | Cole et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6224601 | Friedl | May 2001 | B1 |
6228086 | Wahl et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6231576 | Frigg et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6245075 | Betz et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6248109 | Stoffella | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6261289 | Levy | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6270499 | Leu et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6273892 | Orbay et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6283969 | Grusin et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6296645 | Hover et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6319253 | Ackeret et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6355069 | DeCarlo et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6358250 | Orbay | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6364882 | Orbay | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6379359 | Dahners | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6379360 | Ackeret et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6383185 | Baumgart | May 2002 | B1 |
6387098 | Cole et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6395033 | Pepper | May 2002 | B1 |
6402753 | Cole et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6409768 | Tepic et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6416516 | Stauch et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6423066 | Harder et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6440135 | Orbay et al. | Aug 2002 | B2 |
6443954 | Bramlet et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6461360 | Adam | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6488684 | Bramlet et al. | Dec 2002 | B2 |
6508819 | Orbay | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6508820 | Bales | Jan 2003 | B2 |
6514253 | Yao | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6524313 | Fassir et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6524314 | Dean et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6527775 | Warburton | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6533788 | Orbay | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6547791 | Buhren et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6554833 | Levy et al. | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6572620 | Schon et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6579294 | Robioneck | Jun 2003 | B2 |
6607531 | Frigg | Aug 2003 | B2 |
6629976 | Gnos et al. | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6648889 | Bramlet et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6652529 | Swanson | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6658189 | Ajima et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6660009 | Azar | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6702823 | Iaia | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6706046 | Orbay et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6709436 | Hover et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6730087 | Butsch | May 2004 | B1 |
6730090 | Orbay et al. | May 2004 | B2 |
6736818 | Perren et al. | May 2004 | B2 |
6755862 | Keynan | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6767351 | Orbay et al. | Jul 2004 | B2 |
6786908 | Hover et al. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6793659 | Putnam | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6796984 | Soubeiran | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6808527 | Lower et al. | Oct 2004 | B2 |
6866665 | Orbay | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6893444 | Orbay | May 2005 | B2 |
6926720 | Castaneda | Aug 2005 | B2 |
7008425 | Philips | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7018380 | Cole | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7033365 | Powell et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7041104 | Cole et al. | May 2006 | B1 |
7066943 | Zirkle, Jr. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7247156 | Ekholm et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
20010011172 | Orbay et al. | Aug 2001 | A1 |
20020032446 | Orbay | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020143337 | Orbay et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020143338 | Orbay et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020156474 | Wack et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020183753 | Manderson | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030055428 | Swanson | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030069581 | Stinson et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030073999 | Putnam | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030083660 | Orbay | May 2003 | A1 |
20030083661 | Orbay et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030105461 | Putnam | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20060015101 | Warburton et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060015123 | Fencl et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
7115713 | Jun 1975 | DE |
0091499 | Oct 1983 | EP |
0118778 | Mar 1987 | EP |
0491138 | Oct 1991 | EP |
0 649 289 | May 1992 | EP |
0547380 | Jun 1993 | EP |
1 095 626 | May 2001 | EP |
1330988 | Jul 2003 | EP |
2586554 | Aug 1985 | FR |
2668360 | Oct 1990 | FR |
1428653 | Mar 1976 | GB |
WO 9818397 | May 1998 | WO |
WO 0156452 | Jan 2001 | WO |
WO 0156452 | Aug 2001 | WO |
WO 03037160 | Oct 2002 | WO |
WO 03037160 | May 2003 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20060200143 A1 | Sep 2006 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 10377255 | Feb 2003 | US |
Child | 11381227 | US | |
Parent | 09668941 | Sep 2000 | US |
Child | 10377255 | US |