This application is the U.S. National Stage application of International Application No. PCT/CH2004/000379, filed Jun. 22, 2004.
The invention concerns an intramedullary nail for use in repairing bone fractures and, more particularly, an intramedullary nail for use in repairing fractures of the distal tibia.
An intramedullary nail of this kind is known from European patent publication EP 1 024 762 to LEU. This known intramedullary nail comprises several transversal distal holes, whose borehole axes all cross the intramedullary nail's central line. The disadvantage of this transversal hole setup is that the introduction of the force for the forces to be transmitted through the intramedullary nail occurs in a bone volume whose dimensions transversal to the central axis are limited to the diameter of the locking screws and are therefore stressing the same bone fibres in a longitudinal direction.
The invention intends to provide a remedy for this situation. The task of the invention is to create an intramedullary nail which allows a high degree of locking stability and introduction of force, for the forces to be transmitted across the intramedullary nail that is optimally distributed over the cross section of the bone.
The invention solves the proposed task by an intramedullary nail comprising a longitudinal nail body having a total length, a distal stem portion and a proximal portion the distal stem portion having an outer diameter D and configured and dimensioned for insertion into a medullary canal of a bone. The longitudinal nail body defines a central longitudinal axis coaxial with a line connecting a first center of gravity of a first transverse cross-section taken through the nail body orthogonal to the central longitudinal axis with a second center of gravity of a second transverse cross-section taken through the nail body orthogonal to the central longitudinal axis. At least a first through-hole and a second through-hole are formed in the distal stem portion transverse to the central longitudinal axis, the first through-hole having a radius R1 and defining a first central hole axis transverse to the central longitudinal axis and the second through-hole having a radius R2 and defining a second central hole axis transverse to the central longitudinal axis. At least one of the first and second central holes axes is offset a distance d1>0 from the central longitudinal axis of the nail body, and (d1+R1)<(D/2), such that the mantle surfaces of each of the two through-holes are wholly inside the intramedullary nail body.
The advantages attained by the invention are essentially to be seen in the fact that thanks to the intramedullary nail according to the invention:
In a special form of embodiment the borehole axes of at least two cross holes exhibit distances d1>0 and d2>0 with respect to the central line.
In another form of embodiment, the borehole axes of the at least two cross holes run past the central line on opposite sides. The advantage of this embodiment is based on the fact that the bone screws capable of being introduced in both cross holes are not stressing the same bone fibre of the tubular bone.
In a further form of embodiment the borehole axis of the at least one cross hole is set in a plane orthogonal to the central line at a distance d1.
In an additional form of embodiment, the distances d1 and d2 are, with respect to the diameter D, in a range of 0.0001 D<d<0.6000 D, and preferably in a range of 0.2 D<d<0.5 D, respectively.
In another form of embodiment the intramedullary nail includes a channel coaxial to the central line.
The orthogonal cross-sectional surfaces of the intramedullary nail can preferably be conformed in a circular or circle-shaped form.
In a special form of embodiment the at least two cross holes are placed in the distal half of the intramedullary nail.
The distance d is advantageously larger than 0.5 mm and preferably larger than 1.0 mm. However, the distance d1 is properly smaller than 0.5 mm and preferably smaller than 3.5 mm. The distance d1 depends up to a certain point on the diameter of the intramedullary nail. The D/d1 ratio between the diameter D of the intramedullary nail and the distance d1 should therefore properly be larger than 5, preferably larger than 8. On the other hand, the D/d1 ratio between the diameter D of the intramedullary nail and the distance d1 should properly be smaller than 25, preferably smaller than 21.
In another form of embodiment, the mantle surfaces of the at least two cross holes are fully embedded inside the intramedullary nail, meaning that the cross holes open only when entering and leaving the intramedullary nail, and are for the rest wholly extended inside the intramedullary nail.
The invention and developments of the invention will be clarified in further detail below, by using schematic representations of several examples of preferred embodiments.
The figures show:
The form of embodiment of an intramedullary nail shown in
In the example shown, the cylinder axes 9 of the two virtual borehole cylinder 10 cross each other under an angle β of 60°. In the example shown, the diameter Db of the virtual borehole cylinder 10 in the example is equal to 0.3 times D.
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/CH2004/000379 | 6/22/2004 | WO | 00 | 7/20/2007 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2005/122931 | 12/29/2005 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2834342 | Yost | May 1958 | A |
3255747 | Cochran et al. | Jun 1966 | A |
3433220 | Zickel | Mar 1969 | A |
4095591 | Graham, Jr. et al. | Jun 1978 | A |
4103683 | Neufeld | Aug 1978 | A |
4172452 | Forte et al. | Oct 1979 | A |
4274163 | Malcom et al. | Jun 1981 | A |
4438762 | Kyle | Mar 1984 | A |
4494535 | Haig | Jan 1985 | A |
4612920 | Lower | Sep 1986 | A |
4621628 | Brudermann | Nov 1986 | A |
4622959 | Marcus | Nov 1986 | A |
4657001 | Fixel | Apr 1987 | A |
4697585 | Williams | Oct 1987 | A |
4705027 | Klaue | Nov 1987 | A |
4754749 | Tsou | Jul 1988 | A |
4776330 | Chapman et al. | Oct 1988 | A |
4791918 | Von Hasselbach | Dec 1988 | A |
4805607 | Engelhardt et al. | Feb 1989 | A |
4817591 | Klaue | Apr 1989 | A |
4858602 | Seidel et al. | Aug 1989 | A |
4875474 | Border | Oct 1989 | A |
4973332 | Kummer | Nov 1990 | A |
5032125 | Durham et al. | Jul 1991 | A |
5041114 | Chapman et al. | Aug 1991 | A |
5041115 | Frigg et al. | Aug 1991 | A |
5120171 | Lasner | Jun 1992 | A |
5167663 | Brumfield | Dec 1992 | A |
5176681 | Lawes et al. | Jan 1993 | A |
5300074 | Frigg | Apr 1994 | A |
5312406 | Brumfield | May 1994 | A |
5364398 | Chapman et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
5374235 | Ahrens | Dec 1994 | A |
5454813 | Lawes | Oct 1995 | A |
5472444 | Huebner et al. | Dec 1995 | A |
5484439 | Olson et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
5549610 | Russell et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5573536 | Grosse et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
5578035 | Lin | Nov 1996 | A |
5591168 | Judet et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
5658287 | Hofmann et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
5658339 | Tronzo et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
5713901 | Tock | Feb 1998 | A |
5713902 | Friedl | Feb 1998 | A |
5728099 | Tellman et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5741256 | Bresina | Apr 1998 | A |
5772662 | Chapman et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5908422 | Bresina | Jun 1999 | A |
5928235 | Friedl | Jul 1999 | A |
5935127 | Border | Aug 1999 | A |
5976139 | Bramlet | Nov 1999 | A |
6010506 | Gosney et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6059785 | Schavan et al. | May 2000 | A |
6123708 | Kilpela et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6126661 | Faccioli et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6187007 | Frigg et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6197065 | Martin et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6200685 | Davidson | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6261290 | Friedl | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6296645 | Hover et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6454810 | Lob | Sep 2002 | B1 |
7182765 | Roth et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
20020103488 | Lower et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020151898 | Sohngen et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020173792 | Severns et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20030069581 | Stinson et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030114855 | Wahl et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20060064095 | Senn et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060111716 | Schlienger et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060149248 | Schlienger et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060161155 | Schlienger et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060189988 | Schlienger et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060235395 | Frigg et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060241605 | Schlienger et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
668 173 | Dec 1988 | CH |
674 613 | Jun 1990 | CH |
196 29 011 | Jan 1998 | DE |
199 45 611 | Sep 2001 | DE |
0 251 583 | Jan 1988 | EP |
0 321 170 | Jun 1989 | EP |
0 381 462 | Aug 1990 | EP |
0 411 273 | Feb 1991 | EP |
0 471 418 | Feb 1992 | EP |
0 838 199 | Apr 1998 | EP |
0 845 245 | Jun 1998 | EP |
0 853 923 | Jul 1998 | EP |
0 882 431 | Dec 1998 | EP |
0 919 200 | Jun 1999 | EP |
0 968 685 | Jun 1999 | EP |
1 024 762 | Aug 2000 | EP |
1 053 718 | Nov 2000 | EP |
1 214 914 | Jun 2002 | EP |
1 260 188 | Nov 2002 | EP |
2 784 283 | Apr 2000 | FR |
2209947 | Jun 1989 | GB |
09-066059 | Mar 1997 | JP |
09-066060 | Mar 1997 | JP |
09-066061 | Mar 1997 | JP |
11-137566 | May 1999 | JP |
2000-051224 | Feb 2000 | JP |
2000-051225 | Feb 2000 | JP |
2000-342596 | Dec 2000 | JP |
WO 9315679 | Aug 1993 | WO |
WO 9615737 | May 1996 | WO |
WO 9737606 | Oct 1997 | WO |
WO 9805263 | Feb 1998 | WO |
WO 9830164 | Jul 1998 | WO |
WO 9841161 | Sep 1998 | WO |
WO 9846169 | Oct 1998 | WO |
WO 9920195 | Apr 1999 | WO |
WO 9920195 | Apr 1999 | WO |
WO 0044946 | Aug 2000 | WO |
WO 0067653 | Nov 2000 | WO |
WO 02060331 | Aug 2002 | WO |
WO 03015649 | Feb 2003 | WO |
WO 03101320 | Dec 2003 | WO |
WO 03101320 | Dec 2003 | WO |
WO 2004082494 | Sep 2004 | WO |
WO 2004082494 | Sep 2004 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20070288019 A1 | Dec 2007 | US |